8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
1/19
1
A N I M A L L A W
L E C T U R E S E R I E S
K E Y N O T E A D D R E S S
BRUCE WAGMAN
SCHIFF HARDIN
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND (US )
I really cant thank you all enough for coming, and thank Voiceless enough for
having me here. Its really my honour and privilege to be here in this room, in thiswonderful room filled with so many people. The fact that you are here proves the
legitimacy, not only of the movement but of what Justice Kirby said in his opinion
and other judges have said in America in their opinions - animal law is a matter of
public concern. Its a matter thats on peoples minds. Whether you are somebody
who is ready to go and ready to fight for the animals or just interested, merely the fact
that youre here demonstrates that this is something that our society is interested in
and needs to address. This morning we had a QC, an MP, a judge. This evening we
have Justice Kirby and others. It is quite impressive. It is rare, even in America, that
we get these many esteemed people showing up.
What I have been asked to do is tell you a little bit about my history, how I got to
the point where I am today with respect to my practice as an animal lawyer, and then
to discuss some particular cases. I am going to lead you through a bunch of cases as
we go through.
First, were going to look at this nice picture. Two dogs and a woman on a beach.
And Im going to tell you that I
brought this picture out last night,and Professor Sankoff brought out
almost an identical picture. My
picture is from Stinson Beach,
California; his picture was from
some beach in New Zealand. We
debated about who had a better
beach, but the point is we both had
that picture, and I suspect many of
you have some similar picture or a
picture of an animal. The point is that the things Ill be talking about today are world
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
2/19
2
wide. Theyre global. Im going to talk about American law, but its not just
happening in America; its not just happening in Australia. Its happening
everywhere, and I mean both the concern for animals, and the abuse and torture and
suffering of animals.
I first came to animal law almost by mistake. There was a busy job, one I wanted
a break from. There was an American Bar Association conference, it said something
about animals. I had dogs and cats, I thought Id go. I walked in, I found out about
the way animals were treated in America, and I walked out with a revelation, the only
one Ive ever had in my life, and I said I cant participate in this suffering any more,
and Im going to do what I can to change. Over the last 17 years, my practice has
gone from one pro bono case here and there with respect to animal law to what I
describe as a seven day a week, 150 per cent time animal law practice. For the last
five years, thats basically all Ive done. So now, were going to run through a bunch
of cases and clients, if you will, that Ive had over the years.
That was my first client.
Hes a Tuli elk. He lives in the
Point Reyes National Seashore
in California, and he and about
300 of his family were put on
this land to get away from a
disease called brucellosis (that
was not named after me). Overtime, they did very well. They
got over the disease and they
spread, and on that land as well
were a bunch of ranchers, who
had been given 99 year leases for $1 to continue their use and exploitation of animals
in farming situations. So the first case was to try to get them off the land. The first
case was a good example of how to be an animal lawyer and how not to be an animal
lawyer. Dont take a case that requires Federal statutes, tries to get people who have
been on the land for 500 years off it when youve been out of school for three weeks.
It doesnt work. So we lost, and thats another point. PETA has said it, Justice Kirby
has referred to it. We are trying to change the world here. Were going to lose. Every
social justice reform movement, every civil rights movement, has a lot of losing cases
before the success finally comes. What we have thats not going to stop is the passion
and the heart to continue.
When I lost a case pretty badly early on, but it was a total situation of a judge just
not acknowledging the interests of animals, I called up Joyce Tischler, the head of the
Animal Defense Fund in tears, and she said Bruce, the bad news for them is youre
not going away, and thats where we are at today.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
3/19
3
Heres a list of many American animal protection organizations, some of which
may be familiar to you, some of which arent, but you can sort of tell what they all do
and they have all been clients at
one time or another.
I like sometimes - because Im
an animal lover - to list my
clients by species, so Ive had
chimpanzees, gibbons, gorillas,
lions, dogs, cats, elephants, seals,
dolphins and millions and
millions of animals involved in
factory farming.
Dolphins we learn a lot as animal
lawyers. Thats one of the exciting
things about it.
Its an intellectually challenging
field, because we are trying to take the
square peg of animals and put it in the
round hole of the law some place its
never been before, and try to convince
judges to understand that they can do
that as well. But we also learn the facts of things that may look okay to us on their
face, like a swim with the dolphins program. I thought a swim with the dolphins
program Id never been involved in one, but it sounded pretty cool. You get in a
pool with a dolphin and they pull you around boy, its every kids dream. It turns
out those dolphins are seriously drugged. They are on constant drugs for their
digestive system because they have ulcers and they are on antidepressants all the time
because they are locked in a situation they can never get out of. We are not supposed
to be with dolphins. So my next case was to try to stop a swim with the dolphins
program in Reno, Nevada. I know youre from Australia, you may not realize youmay have heard of Las Vegas. Its a really horrible place that were usually
embarrassed about if were from America. Well, Reno is like the slums of Las Vegas.
I hope theres nobody from Reno here. My point really is its not a place for dolphins.
They dont belong there and thats what we fought.
We talk about companionship a lot. Many of you may have companion animals.
Thats what brings many people to animal law, their dogs or their cats. How much
would you pay for your dog or your cat? Many people would say Not a million
dollars would I give him or her up for, so many of the cases in animal law these daysin America are law suits over injuries or deaths of animals. What would you do if
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
4/19
4
somebody came in and killed one of those animals, who happened to be mine? How
do you value them is the question. How do judges take this piece of property and
decide what the real value is? We have talked about property, but appreciate this: my
dogs and my cats arent worth as
much as this bottle of water. I gotthem from the pound, they were
about to kill them. They were
worthless in the eyes of the law,
and the market the day I got them.
They have devalued in price.
From a strictly market perspective
I should pay somebody who kills
them, but thats obviously not the
way we value animals. So we try
to value what that companionship is; what price do you put on a piece of property
whose only value is the benefit that he or she brings you, whether medical, therapeutic
or companionship? There has to be a way to value that, and more and more judges
are appreciating that, but the law still says property, but there are ways to change it,
and thats a whole other lecture.
Custody cases are very big.
This case is the plaintiff, the dog,
versus the cat saying who gets the
bed.
But seriously, custody cases
are big in America these days, and
while theyre sometimes just
between two couples who are
bickering and using the dog as the
pawn, just like people use children,
we do take on cases in which we
are trying to decide the animals best interest. If the animals best interest is at issue
that changes everything, because in general again theyre property. You get the
Cadillac, she gets the dog, but if we can get a judge to say Wait, Im going to
consider where the dog goes based on who treats the dog better, that actually is from
the perspective of the dog and that is so important. So that increases the value of
animals because it takes that piece of property and turns them into something
different. I like to call it quasi-property. Theyre not people were never going to
say theyre people but theyre not property. Theyre not this bottle. Another
custody case.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
5/19
5
Heres where it gets ugly,
and by ugly I dont mean really
ugly like the dogs arent ugly,
but this world is ugly. This is a
horrible place for manyanimals. Many of you have
animals who are probably
asleep on the pillow right now
whether you know it or not, but
these animals never left that
cage. I do a lot of work on cases that are known as hoarding cases, or collector cases.
In the past four years I have had four cases, and those four cases alone involved 1100
animals kept by four people in situations like this.
They never leave the cages; the cages are never cleaned; they live and breathe in
their urine and faeces for months and months and months. Many of them are
breeders. Theyre breeders and theyre hoarders. The animals suffer badly. Theyre
stacked constantly. If youre at the bottom of the stack of four crates, you know what
comes down all the time. These people dont change that and the animals suffer very
very badly. Number one we have what most of you can appreciate, whether you have
companion animals or not confinement; the confinement that were going to talk
about even more with pigs and cows. These dogs never get out to do anything. They
never get any interaction. We have trained domestic animals to be with us. These
animals get no human interaction, get no human connection, nor do they even get time
to do anything with themselves.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
6/19
6
But even worse than that,
if it could be worse, is the
physical disease.
Heres one of the dogs
from the 550 dogs and 21
birds we took from a couple
in Sanford, North Carolina.
The couple are both 68 going
on about 85 and what they did is not take care of 550 dogs. Every once in a while
they walked around and threw some food in, but the problems we see in these cases
are exhibited by this female Pomeranian here.
Almost no teeth, and blind. Eye problems and
teeth problems are rampant in hoarding cases.Why is that? Because the nutrition, and the lack
of sanitation, is so bad that their teeth literally fall
out of their mouths. Their jaws literally rot out.
Lets stop a moment here and stop getting
clinical and get real about what were talking
about. Were talking about mammals. They feel
just the same way as we do. The empirical
research referred to earlier that weve done is that
a dog feels tooth pain just like you or I. These
dogs had their teeth rot out of their mouths. You
know how quickly you go to the dentist when
youve got a little toothache and you cant even
see it. Theyve been suffering for six months, nine months, years, and never gotten
any treatment. The 550 dogs at this facility had never seen a veterinarian. So again,
its really important to bring home to all of us, and especially to the outside world, to
judges, that mammals as well as birds feel the same way we do. They may speak a
different language about that feeling but its there, and the science is there. We use
veterinarians on a regular basis in cases to demonstrate to judges this is not somecrazy animal loving, anthropocentric human saying Dusty just doesnt feel good.
This is a veterinarian who can say This pain is exactly the same and its worse for
animals. We understand if were in pain we may get out of it. Many of you may
appreciate that your dog thinks now is forever - like when you go away for 12 hours,
you come home and he goes crazy; you go away for two minutes, you come home and
he goes crazy.
They live in this kind of filthy environment, absolutely deprived of everything.
Almost all the hoarding situations are the same. Some of them are much worse, withcannibalism and dead animals around, and I should say I apologise for the graphic
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
7/19
7
nature but I dont really apologise because I want you to see the reality. But what I
should tell you is, Im not showing you the bad pictures, believe it or not.
This is really the most graphic picture
Ive got to show you about hoarding. In
that 550 dog facility, there were ten
boxes like this. In each box, there were
somewhere between four and eight dogs.
This is not a trick. The other two sides of
this box are the same as what youre
looking at. The tops were in some cases
nailed shut. Occasionally every two
weeks they threw some food in. That
was it. Life in a dark box for these
animals. Thats the kind of situations we see on a regular basis. Hoarding is not an
erratic situation, it is epidemic in America and, I think, around the world. Its
definitely the number one threat to companion animals in America. We have a
reported 700 cases a year. Thats just whats reported. Thats like saying how many
reports have there been of marijuana smoking this year, and you multiply by how
many are not seen.
So it is a major problem. Its not limited to companion animals. We had a 700 to
800 exotic animal hoarding situation which included chimpanzees, monkeys, all sorts
of cats. Not to mention again the sanitation, they estimated that there were over200,000 rats in this particular facility, and they werent being kept at the hoarding
facility.
Mountain lions an American
icon. So when they discovered there
were 125 mountain lions somewhere in
the Black Hills of South Dakota, they
decided Hey, lets kill them. Lets
have a hunt. Well be real careful, and
well make sure we dont kill them all,and well also make sure that theres
plenty of restraints on whats
happening, and besides you really
never see a mountain lion. So we
sued the State of South Dakota and tried to stop the hunt.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
8/19
8
Again, we lost, despite the fact that the
testimony from the other side was that
the hunting would probably and could
likely cause the extinction of the
mountain lions despite that, the judgesaid that the hunt could go on, and one
of the big defences was Well never
see a mountain lion, youll never kill
them. This is 24 hours after we lost.
This mountain lion had a cub near her,
who was then picked up and taken to a
research facility.
Experimentation on animals is constant, and we all know
that, and we all hate to look at these pictures and again
I apologise, but this is a big issue in animal law. The
Animal Welfare Act in America does very little to protectthese animals, other than very minimum restraints on
exactly how theyre housed. I have been involved in
several cases which do our best to provide for these
animals when theyre not in research. Whatever you
think about research and I understand the controversy,
and I understand the desire to cure diseases is this
okay?
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
9/19
9
Another big issue in every population isdomestic animals, and too many of them. InAmerica we euthanize four to five milliondomestic animals every single year. This is adog being lowered into a cage, which will then
be pushed into the gas chamber, where they willbe euthanized. Now, dont gasp right awaybecause gassing is legal in 43 states in America,and is an approved method of euthanasia inmany areas. If done correctly and properly, its
almost as good as euthanasia by injection. But it just so happened the State ofGeorgia decided they didnt approve of it, because they felt it was too bad. Despitethat - and this reflects not so much just in the State of Georgia, but in the state ofhumanitys feelings about animals - the State of Georgia Department of Agriculture,the commissioner, one of the top officials in the state, had gone around to shelters,and said despite the law that said no gas chambers, You guys should buy a gas
chamber.We had documents. They werent even hiding it. It wasnt even really hard,
except suing the State of Georgia is not easy, by anybody especially a California
lawyer. Despite that, we got the right judge, and that judge ruled that the Department
of Agriculture had to stop their practices and so overnight we shut down the illegal
gas chambers in Georgia. This is the kind of success that really just makes your day,
makes your life. Overnight we stopped the suffering of some 10,000 animals in
Georgia - year by year by year, going forward forever, and the evidence was
unfortunately that in Georgia gas chamber euthanasia was not done correctly, and
animals were suffering in horrible ways.
Heres another one of those bubbles that gets
burst. Theres a cute little chimpanzee you see on TV
or in the movies, right? Well, he is cute, but to get
him to put those clothes on hes been beaten with bats
and sticks and chains, and kicked and abused in ways
that you cant even imagine. Every single
chimpanzee that shows up in a movie or television has
had that done to him. This is not the animal rights
activist talking, this is testimony from Jane Goodall,
who many of you have probably heard of; testimony
from Roger Fouts, probably the worlds leader in
captive chimpanzee training and maybe even more
important than the experts we know so well, its
testimony from inside the industry. Thats how we get exotic animals to perform for
us. Its not funny; its not cute. But we dont see that, and as Justice Kirby mentioned
and as Professor Sankoff mentioned, its what we dont know that we need to know
that I think will change us.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
10/19
10
You folks came here tonight to learn
about something, as brutal as it may be to
learn, and to walk out with that
knowledge, but that knowledge will
empower us to change. And as strangeas it may be, in the very small niche of
animal law that Ive developed this sub-
niche of chimpanzee law partly
because of this knowledge, but also
chimpanzees have been sort of separated out for us as humans, because as many of
you may know they are so close to us. They share 98.7 per cent of our DNA. I never
quite understand why were above them in the evolutionary scale, because they seem
to have it a lot better down, but
nevertheless there they are.
But theres that chimp, and heres Taya
who we rescued who had her head split
open by a lock, like a combination lock, by
her trainer and ended up in surgery.
So we do our best, and Ive done two
or three cases trying to get animals out of
entertainment. There are amazing exemptions for the use of animals in entertainment
in America, because theyre coupled with the exemptions for the use of animals inresearch, and chimpanzees were considered at one point in time as the primary
research specimen for AIDS research.
But setting aside the research issue, would any of you say I would like to see that
chimpanzee on TV, and its okay with me if he got beaten with a chain for me to see
that. I bet theres nobody wholl come forward and say yes.
Also because chimpanzees are so close to us, we have tried to establish some
personhood status, and I dont mean just the same as us. Were not advocating that
they can vote, or buy cars, or drive cars but something more than property, becausethere is such a connection. They understand us. They are so curious because they are
so intelligent.
They also apparently like tattoos, see the tattoos? But the point
is they have an intelligence that we
understand and that we can
recognize, because they look so
similar to us, and so we have
worked to their increased rights
the notion being not for me that
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
11/19
11
chimpanzees are any more deserving of rights than chickens, or pigs, or cows, but just
that they can be if you will a keystone species. If we can get people to start
thinking that somebody other than us deserves some protection, then hopefully it will
be a slippery slope, and well be down the bottom of that slope with chickens in
enough time.
We are also their guardians. We have put them in entertainment; we have put
them in research; and now we have to take care of them. They cant go back to the
wild, if you didnt know that. They have to stay in cages for the rest of their lives, but
we can take on the task of taking care of them. And so we have entered several cases
and argued that we should be guardians - guardian ad litem for you lawyers - in a
particular case where we can represent the chimpanzee separate and apart from the
plaintiff and defendant, and in America thats actually been extended now to dogs in
certain cases. Im not sure if the Michael Vick case is as popular here as it was over
there, but Mr Vick was a football player who was involved in dog fighting, and as far
as I am concerned did more for us than most animal lawyers have done, because he
exposed that practice and in that case for the first time ever a Federal Court judge
appointed a guardian for the 40 dogs that were saved from his facility, in his
compound. And in the great State of Tennessee, a judge also in another case, in a
custody case, between the parents and the partner of a deceased man who were
arguing over a dog, granted guardianship to the dog.
So those are all things I do, and theyre all reasons why I go to work every day.
But what happened to me in 1992 when I had thatrevelation was about this. This picture just demonstrates
what Katrina was talking about before. Everybody else is
that little dot; everything weve talked about until now, and
the large percentage of animals in terms of numbers are
farmed animals. Not only that, they undoubtedly suffer the
worst cruelty. They suffer cruelty for the most part from the day theyre born to the
day they die, and whatever method that death is and however long or short that death
may be. Thats the state of the world. Its the state of the world here in Australia, and
in America. Animals are commodities; theyre pieces of meat; theyre products were
going to use and we dont consider them to be sentient beings but they are. So we
go down on the farm and we try to change whats going on there. But were not
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
12/19
12
talking about this farm. Were not talking about what everybody either thinks is
happening or wants to think is happening. Were talking about the reality, but this is
reality if they were treated they way they should be. Its why we fight, if you will.
They have sentiency; they have intelligence;
they understand what theyre doing. They
appreciate the good things in life, like a good bath.
They like to go swimming. They know when
things smell good. They like the soft feel of hay,
like we like the soft feel of a bed.
Every one of these animals that were talking
about, every one of these animals that you eat, or whose products you eat, have family
lives if we let them have them. Their young stay with them; their young care about
them. When young calves are taken away from their mothers, so that we can drinktheir mothers milk, the mothers scream and cry for up
to seven days. Thats not anecdotal; thats scientific.
Thats reported. Theyre
socially cooperative, like
we are. They may not all
sit in a room like this, but
theyll all walk around on
the farm together. They wont bother each other. They
certainly wont kill each other. But thats not whats happening. Yes, there may befarms here in Australia and there are certainly farms in California that look like this,
but 99 per cent of the meat, milk and dairy that you get comes from places with a
stark contrast.
Im not sure how bad this looks to
you, but these animals never leave these
pens. They stay here until the day that
they are pork, or bacon, or ham. They
have not one shred of their natural lives
led. Industry says occasionally indefence, when theyre bold enough to say,
Well, they can still live and breathe and
excrete. Thats not enough as far as Im
concerned, and so we try to change that.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
13/19
13
We talked just a little bit, so Ill tell you a
little bit more about sows in production;
mothers in production. Again remember these
are mothers, just like any of you who have
been a mother, or any of you who have had amother so I think that covers everybody.
The sows are mothers for their entire lives,
much shorter than their lives would be, but
they start out as sows in gestation, gestation
crates, gestation meaning pregnancy.
As Justice Kirby described, those crates
are what youre looking at. Its shorter
and narrower than the pig herself, so for
her entire life she is pressed against
metal steel bars. Again, remember its
just like if you were pressed against
metal steel bars for your entire life and
could never move, and all you could do
was just stand up and lay down. Thats
the life for sows who raise the pigs who
become ham and pork.
In general, as I understand it, the pork industry then discards the sows. They dont
even use them for anything. Theyre just trash. Animals are not trash, but to the porkindustry they are, so once they become spent another industry term meaning they
can no longer produce the number of young in a pregnancy thats desired theyre
thrown out with the trash. Their young go on to come on our tables. Theres another
shot. Thats how they are. They cant move. Imagine living like that.
One other factor about the pigs. In addition to this confinement, which I submit
would be enough for anybody to say I dont want to be involved in this, there are
extremely cruel practices which are committed on them on a regular basis. Just some
examples, none of them with anesthesia, so just again the pain as it is. They are
castrated, their teeth are clipped, their tails are docked. Just imagine going up to your
dog with big shears and cutting off his tail. Think about how you think he might feel.
Youre right thats how he would feel. Or,
gentlemen, think about someone coming up
and castrating you without anesthesia. Thats
how the pigs feel.
When they are meat pigs, they are kept in
these facilities where they are constantly
pushed against each other, so youve all got
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
14/19
14
your nice little chairs there. Think about if there were not chairs and I made you sit in
this little spot down here. Thats the way the pigs live, and not just for the 45 minutes
you have to listen to me but for their entire lives.
It doesnt get any better for chickens. Some argue it gets worse. As Justice Kirby
said, an A4 piece of paper. We call them 8 by 11 in America, but Im very familiar
with them too. Thats where they are their entire lives. They can never do any of the
natural behaviours that chickens are involved in. Thats where your eggs come from.
Tens of thousands of them are loaded onto trucks, tens of thousands on a regular basis
to be carted across America, and in the facilities there
they are. Dark houses where the light is controlled to
control the production. And of course you can only get
eggs from a female chicken, so if youre a male chick
I dont know, maybe its better, but thats where you go
the day youre born, into the trash. Sometimes youre
sent through a woodchipper; sometimes youre just put
in a dumpster to die with the rest of your brothers.
Veal calves. Youve probably heard of that because in the
80s that became a big cause celebre, and even in America we
stopped eating so much veal. Veal calves do not get out of
their crates. They are stuck in their crates, or theyre stuck in
stanchions, for their entire lives, thousands of them. So how
do we change it? We look to the
law, were lawyers. Thats what
we do. So how about federal
law? There should be some good
protection in America regarding
animal protection. There is not
one federal anti-cruelty law. People find that
shocking. I imagine youd find that shocking that
thats the case in Australia as well, because we think
somebody must be watching out. Most people say
to me, I know theres anti-cruelty laws, doesnt thattake care of it? No, it doesnt. Something I
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
15/19
15
mentioned earlier called the Animal Welfare Act in America doesnt cover farmed
animals - sorry guys, youre out of luck - but people think the opposite. There are
actually two Federal laws in America that cover farmed animals. The first one is the
28 hour law. So imagine being in a truck like that, or like that, for 27 hours and 50
minutes without food, without stopping, without water. Thats what anybody can dolegally to an animal in America. After 28 hours they have to give them five hours of
rest. They are trucked across America.
But remember its been mentioned before in addition to all those farmed
animals in that circle, we can separate it out again. 90 per cent of the animals
9 billion every year in America, I guess 450,000,000 in Australia are chickens. In
America, the United States Department of Agriculture has declared that chickens
dont apply, or dont fit, within the 28 hour law. So theyre not protected at all, and it
took until 2006 for the USDA to say Well, trucks apply even though trucks are the
way these animals are trucked across they said only trains apply because the law
was written 100 years ago. Tens of thousands on a truck.
The other law in America that supposedly protects animals protects them at the
very, very end of their life, and I submit that is really a joke. I dont say that lightly,
but its the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. How do you humanely kill an animal?
Well, before you kill him it seems that you should render him unconscious, and that is
indeed the first requirement in this law. S1901A says animals can be shocked and
hung upside down. Thats the safe way to do it to make sure that we dont get any
diseases, if theyre unconscious. But then, because kosher slaughter and other ritualforms of slaughter require a conscious animal, they said the other way to do it is,
Well, dont render them unconscious. How can they both be humane? That was
challenged, and the courts said Congress decided that both ways were humane. So I
guess both ways were humane.
Additionally, since kosher slaughter was the issue, and thats a religious practice,
the challenge was under the United States First Amendment and you have similar
laws here that says you cant mix religion and law. But the court said no, because it
has a secular purpose, this humane purpose. Lo and behold last year, with an appeal
pending probably coming up this year, the USDA stood by its position that chickensdont have any coverage under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act. So again,
remember how many? 90 per cent of the animals that are slaughtered in America are
covered by no laws, just about. So that line is live chickens about to be placed in
boiling water. Thats how they get to die. So we give up with the Feds, we go to the
state laws. What can we do there? As a matter of fact, weve got some pretty good
cruelty laws in America. Look at all those words, those are words from most of the
cruelty statutes in America. It looks like they apply to what Im talking about. Right?
Theyre certainly overloaded, theyre overdriven, its unjustifiable, the pain, theyre
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
16/19
16
cruelly treated. Theres situations of neglect and omission I wont go through every
word but it all fits.
Right? Wrong. S35 states say Cruelty law is the law of the state but it doesnt
apply to either any farmed animal or standard farmed animal practices. All the
practices I have described to you, both the confinement and the unanaesthetised
castration et cetera, are standard practices and therefore they are exempt from the
cruelty laws.
So weve had to get creative, and weve done that. Weve challenged horse
slaughter, based on laws that say you cant slaughter a horse for human consumption
based on the cruelty behind that, and have had that upheld. We are currently in
litigation against the meat industry, which wants to take animals that are down and
this is what downed animals look like. They cant get up because they are too sick or
injured in the slaughterhouse yard to get up. This cow has had her neck broken afterher calf was taken away from her, and we have litigated that particular case both
because of the cruelty and because these are some of the diseases just a sample on
these two slides that you can get from animals who have been in big production or
even from eating the animals, and dont let anybody walk away saying I said you can
get swine flu from eating pork. But intensive confinement has caused the problems
that we are seeing today. That case is currently in litigation.
Youve got rights here in Australia like we do in America as taxpayers, as
citizens, so weve used whats called the taxpayer claim to challenge the
governments involvement with these practices, which we contend are cruel and
illegal. This practice in particular in 2008 we challenged what is called calf
ranching. Its just like veal calves, only calves who are dairy calves are taken from
their mothers from day one, sent to another place and kept in these stanchions for six
months, for a variety of reasons that are good business but certainly cruelty. And the
state subsidises this by giving breaks to those who are involved in this practice. So
we sued on that basis and, as often happens, we lost. But let me stress that a loss is
not a loss like it is in business, where you have to pay somebody, because the public
found out about this. People were alarmed and upset. Recently in California we
passed a law that will bar this kind of practice, and I have to believe its part andparcel because of that case.
Consumer protection you have here too, cases that say Youre lying to me about
the product Im getting. Either you say its humanely treated, or its cage free, or its
just that when I walk into the supermarket I expect that the animals Im eating were
not treated in violation of the law.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
17/19
17
This is the labeling case. This is
the PETA case also known as the
unhappy cows case. In that case the
California Milk Advisory Board, an
arm of the government entitled toadvertise to get people to buy
California dairy products, had the ads
which you see on top, which say
Great cheese comes from happy
cows, and happy cows come from
California. The idea being that, as a
consumer, you want to buy products
from happy cows, cows who are
treated humanely. Below is the way
the cows in California are really treated. 95 per cent of the cows in California never
see a blade of grass. They live in lots that are either mud in the winter or hard dirt in
the summer, and they have horrible diseases that are described in these exhibits from
our complaint. You can see the size of those udders.
So we sued, claiming that there was a misrepresentation which was admitted by
the California Milk Advisory Board, and as often happens in our cases we lost simply
on a procedural issue, which said that the California Milk Advisory Board was not a
person under the statute, not an appropriate organisation, because it was a government
subsidised organisation admittedly lying to the people as it advertised milk.
Heres the other
pig case. Consumer
protection cases
brought by
consumers or
animal protection
groups. So in this
particular case, we
have the Animal Legal Defense Fund
and three purchasers of pork suing over
this particular practice, the practice being
keeping the pigs confined that I have
described based on the fact that this
practice is illegal under the California law
I just mentioned, which says they need
adequate exercise, any animal that is
confined. According to industry, thats
adequate exercise in California. That
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
18/19
18
case was settled, because the industry called up and said Okay, were going to pull
all the cows out of California and they did. Thats what we call a win.
There is also a connection between
Americans and Australians. Do you know where
we get our Adidas? Right there. Adidas are
made from kangaroo
skin. In California we
decided that we didnt
like the methods that
were used to kill
kangaroos, especially the joeys who were bashed and
decapitated, but in general it just didnt seem like a nice way of killing animals not
that we have any way to govern what
happens in Australia, but Californians
decided that was no good. So in order to
protect what for us are just some of the most
amazing animals in the world, from one of
the most amazing countries in the world, we
had this statute that said no kangaroos can be
brought in no kangaroo skins, no kangaroo
leather therefore Adidas would be out of
business in California. We won that case in the
California Supreme Courtand heres anotherone of the ways in which we lose, because this
is a movement of Davids - and the Davids are
Prof Sankoff and the people who work in the
field and Goliaths and the Goliaths are big
industries and big companies that often put
profit ahead of the interests of animals. So as I
said, we won at the California Supreme Court, but then Adidas went to the California
lawmakers and convinced them to repeal the law barring the import of kangaroo
skins, and so they were able to continue their business with no interruption at all. Sowe lost that battle, but we will continue to fight against cruelty.
We need people who know how to litigate to come to our assistance and in my
practice I have probably at any time 30 pro bono lawyers working for me of various
levels, who do this work because they are learning about the problems with animals.
But you also need some key players on your team, and dont get me wrong you
cant do anything without them.
8/3/2019 Bruce Wagman 5thMay09 Keynote Transcript (With Pictures) Updated 060709 FINAL
19/19
You have to have somebody watching the media at all
times. Somebody who can really look for those animal
related issues. Youve also got to get somebody who can
read the briefs and appreciate the points you are putting
forward, otherwise you may never be able to sell it to acourt, so youve got to find one of those experts too.
Most important, the factory farms are closed to us. They are especially closed to
people like me and Prof Sankoff, and Katrina and Brian. They dont let us in any
more, but youve got to figure out a way to get somebody in there, get the information
so you can file the law suits, so you need a private investigator, somebody they wont
know about. She is available; she flies only first class on Qantas; but any time you
want her, shes there.
There is a future for animal law, and there is a future for animals. In the 30 yearsor so that animal law has been going on in America, and in the short time in Australia,
the animal law movement has made incredible strides. Voiceless has done some
amazing things. I have never been in a room, in all of America, with this many
people in one place. I have to attribute that both to the heart of Australians and the
power of what Voiceless has done here. Thank you all.
--o0o--