BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 0 Top-Off Safety Yongjun Li ASAC Meeting October 22, 2009.

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES1

Top-Off Safety

Yongjun LiASAC Meeting

October 22, 2009

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES2

Top-off Safety Study Group

• Yongjun Li (Accelerator Physicist--Tracking Analysis)• Samuel Krinsky (Accelerator Physics Group Leader)• Brett Parker (Accelerator Physicist)• Richard Heese (Injection Systems Design)• Robert Casey (ES&H)• P.K. Job (Radiation Physicist)• Sushil Sharma (Mech. Engineering Group Leader)• Dick Hseuh (Vacuum Group Leader)• Plan to add an electrical engineer for interlocks

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES3

Outline

• Methodology for top-off safety simulation

• NSLS-II beamlines, and their physical apertures

• Machine fault scenarios

• Magnet field profiles and parameters scan

• Interlock system requirement for top-off safety

• Conclusions

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES4

Methodology of Top-Off Safety Simulation

• Top-off safety simulation is used to prove that implementation of fixed apertures and hardware interlocks is sufficient to prevent injected beam from escaping through the open beamline safety shutters, despite possible machine equipment faults.

• We have decided to use forward tracking as developed by A. Terribilo (SLAC), because it allows us tospecify collimators to stop errant electron beam close to the ringpredict the source points of scattering shower produced by

errant electron beam

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES5

NSLS-II Beamlines

• NSLS-II beamlines can be catalogued into classes according to their source point locations:• Source points in IDs at long straight sections• Source points in IDs at short straight sections• Source points in Three Pole Wigglers (TPWs)• Source points from Bending Magnets.• Infrared beamlines

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES6

An Example: NSLS-II Damping Wiggler Beamline

Fixed Mask Safety Shutter

mid point oflong straight

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

37mm

38mm

stick absorber38mm23mm75mm

112mm

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

crotch absorber

Photon stopper

Multipole Chamber Dipole Chamber

bellow

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES7

An Example of Forward Tracking

blue dash line: stored beam orbit

red solid line: photon beamline centre

blue solid lines: collimators and vacuum chamber

0 5 10 15 20 25-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

s (m)

x (m

)

NSLS-II Long Straight Section IDs Top-off Safety simulation

stick absorber

stick absorber

bellow

crotch absorber

fixed mask

photon shutter

stick absorber

vacuum cham

ber

Sextupole SH1 partially shorted; +5% energy deviation; scan over allowed initial phase space

Damping Wiggler

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES8

Machine Fault ScenariosWe are working to identify and classify all possible fault scenarios.Our fault classification is based on that developed at ALS Low probability events:

Dipoles fault:– Field error limited to <5% by interlock on coil current, voltage and existence of stored beam current

Quadrupoles and sextupole fault (no interlock):– Power supply mis-setting– Whole magnet is completely or partially shorted. – Only one pole is completely or partially shorted.

High probability events: Dipoles variation:

– Trim coils +/- 3% Quadrupoles and sextupole variation:

– Vertical offset of beam trajectories, adjustment of K values and power supply ripples Correctors:

– variation from -100% to 100%. Energy deviation: +/- 5.0% Aperture misalignment: +/-2mm

Tracking scan considers the combination of magnet fault scenarios: one low probability event + all high probability events

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES9

Examples of Magnets Field Profiles

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

y=0y=4.95mm

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

y=0y=4.95mm

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

y=0y=4.95mm

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

y=0y=4.95mm

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

Normal quadrupole Quadrupole with one pole shorted

Normal sextupole Sextupole with one pole shorted

B. Parker1D transverse field profiles

2D dipole field profiles

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES10

Interlock Requirements (Preliminary)

Only applied when injecting with safety shutters open

• Beam current• Stored beam current > 25 mA• Loss rate of stored beam current is not >> than normal

• Energy match• Injected beam has < 5% energy deviation from stored beam

(interlock of dipoles at BTR + energy slits)

• Lattice match• Storage ring dipole can’t be below 95% of design field• Based on present analysis, no quadrupoles and sextupoles need

to be interlocked

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES11

Parameters Scan Results

• We have scanned 3 typical beamlines:• Long straight line DW beamline• Short straight line ID beamline• Three Pole Wiggler beamline

• Thus far our forward tracking analysis shows that with specified apertures and interlocks, these beamlines are safe for top-off injection.

• In order to facilitate large scans, we are working to modify the code to enable parallel computation

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES12

Conclusions

• Forward tracking method is being applied to the analysis of NSLS-II top-off safety

• Possible machine fault scenarios are being determined, and included in parameter scan

• Preliminary specification for interlocks has been proposed and is being tested by tracking analysis

• Some typical beamlines have been scanned. With the specified interlocks, preliminary analysis indicates they are safe in top-off operation

• We will complete baseline tracking analysis in FY10 and safety analysis report for review in FY11. Hardware implementation will be ready for commissioning