Top Banner
Fostering worldwide interoperability Geneva, 13-16 July 2009 Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety Homare Murakami, Masayuki Oodo, Hiroshi Harada NICT / ARIB Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14 DOCUMENT #: GSC14-PLEN-071 FOR: Presentation SOURCE: ARIB AGENDA ITEM: 6.2 CONTACT(S): [email protected]
6

Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

wyome

Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14. Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety. Homare Murakami, Masayuki Oodo, Hiroshi Harada NICT / ARIB. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, 13-16 July 2009

Broadband Wireless Communication Systemfor Public Safety

Homare Murakami, Masayuki Oodo, Hiroshi HaradaNICT / ARIB

Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14

DOCUMENT #: GSC14-PLEN-071

FOR: Presentation

SOURCE: ARIB

AGENDA ITEM: 6.2

CONTACT(S): [email protected]

Page 2: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperability 2Geneva, 13-16 July 2009

Background – frequency band–

In Japan, digitalization of terrestrial TV broadcasting service to be completedin July, 2011 == > reduce the total bandwidth for terrestrial TV broadcasting

current

after July, 2011

current analog TV broadcasting (total: 370 MHz)

90 108 170 205 222 470 710 720 730 770[MHz]

3.ITS 4.cellular system

terrestrial digital TV broadcasting (240 MHz)

==> 130 MHz newly available2. Broadband mobile communications for public safety

90 108 170 222 470 770 [MHz]

1.mobile multimediabroadcasting

Page 3: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperability 3Geneva, 13-16 July 2009

Strategic Direction– current and expected systems for public safety–

broadbandshared by multiple public organizations

narrow band

fire department

local government(prefectural/city/municipal)

police agencies

narrow band

difficulty in interoperability

current system-- narrow band voice low data rate transmission-- difficulty in interoperability

-- shared by multiple public organizations-- broadband access service (several Mbps) for mobile users (main application: moving pictures transmission)-- highly-efficient spectrum use => OFDM-based system

expected system

Page 4: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperability 4Geneva, 13-16 July 2009

Challenges for reliability(1/2) – Radio Propagation Field Tests –

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

time [usec]

rela

tive

am

pli

tud

e [d

B]

@P4d=1.6km

peak time+10sec

peak time+20sec

0

-10

-20

-30

-40

-500 10 20 30

time [sec]

rela

tive

pow

er [d

B]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

time [usec]

rela

tive

am

pli

tud

e [d

B]

@P4d=1.6km

peak time+10sec

peak time+20sec

0

-10

-20

-30

-40

-500 10 20 30

time [sec]

rela

tive

pow

er [d

B]

delay spread: => ~ 10usec

@P4

frequency [MHz]

rela

tive

po

we

r [d

B]

5

0

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60-5 0

time[msec]

0

200

100

fading performance:=> slow temporal variation

RSSI measurement=> coverage ~ 5 km

P4

Page 5: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperability 5Geneva, 13-16 July 2009

Challenges for reliability (2/2) – Transmission Experiments –

In order to investigate adequate OFDM parameters, following combinations were tested.

CNR vs BER(profileA,CTC r=1/ 2,QPSK)

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

1E-2

1E-1

1E+0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40CNR[dB]

BE

R

mode2

mode3

mode4

CNR [dB]

BE

R

5 10 15 20 25 30

伝搬路モデル:802.22 Profile A

Mode1Mode2Mode3

0

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

CNR vs BER(profileA,CTC r=1/ 2,QPSK)

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

1E-2

1E-1

1E+0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40CNR[dB]

BE

R

mode2

mode3

mode4

CNR [dB]

BE

R

5 10 15 20 25 30

Mode1Mode2Mode3

Mode1Mode2Mode3

0

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

CNR vs BER(typicalUrban,CTC,QPSK)

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

1E-2

1E-1

1E+0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40CNR[dB]

BER

mode2

mode3

mode4

BE

R

伝搬路モデル:Typical Urban

CNR [dB]5 10 15 20 25 30

0

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Mode1Mode2Mode3

CNR vs BER(typicalUrban,CTC,QPSK)

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

1E-2

1E-1

1E+0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40CNR[dB]

BER

mode2

mode3

mode4

BE

RCNR [dB]

5 10 15 20 25 30

0

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Mode1Mode2Mode3

Mode1Mode2Mode3

Mode # Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3Channel bandwidth 5 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz

FFT Size 512 1024 1024Guard Interval ~10 μsec ~20 μsec ~20 μsec

Pilot symbol occupancy ~30% ~30% ~17%

GSM Typical UrbanIEEE 802.22 Profile A

For long-delayed (~ 20μsec) channel environment,Mode2 (narrower subcarrier interval, resulted in good transmission performance.

For short-delayed (~ 5μsec) channel environment, no large differences among all modes were seen.

Page 6: Broadband Wireless Communication System for Public Safety

Fostering worldwide interoperability 6Geneva, 13-16 July 2009

Toward the realization of broadband wireless communication system for public safety using the VHF bands (a portion of vacant lots after retirement of analog TV broadcasting service),

R & D of the system have been progressed.Indoor and Field experiments have been conducted

to decide the system parameters (service coverage, PHY parameters etc.).

Next Steps/Actions