Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report for … Study and Action Plan... · CONNECT NW PA Broadband Supplemental Report - Preliminary Draft Table of Contents ... CorDECT
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Broadband Study and Action Plan for CONNECT NW PA
Supplemental Report
Creating Optimum Networks n Expanding Connectivity to Northwest PA
A Broadband Project of the Northwest Pennsylvania Regional
Planning & Development Commission
Submitted December 23, 2003
Spotts, Stevens and McCoy, Inc. 1047 North Park Road
Reading, PA 19610-0307 Tel: 610.621.2000 Fax: 610.621.2001
www.ssmgroup.com
Icon Broadband Technologies 6745 Bells Ferry Road Woodstock GA 30189
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Supplemental Report - Preliminary Draft
Table of Contents Main Report-Overview for All Eight (8) Counties………………………………......Sections 1-8 Supplemental Report-Additional Case Studies and Data by County………............Sections 9-10
Section 9: Additional Case Studies.....................................................................................114
Case Studies Utilizing Various Types of Business Models............................................................. 114
Section 10: Additional Exhibits ............................................................................................126 Demographics Data for Pennsylvania and by County .................................................................... 126
Pennsylvania Data.............................................................................................................................................................126 County Data .......................................................................................................................................................................140 Clarion County ..................................................................................................................................................................142 Crawford County...............................................................................................................................................................150 Erie County ........................................................................................................................................................................158 Forest County.....................................................................................................................................................................166 Lawrence County..............................................................................................................................................................174 Mercer County...................................................................................................................................................................182 Venango County................................................................................................................................................................190 Warren County ..................................................................................................................................................................198
Economic Development Initiatives Data by County ...................................................................... 206 Clarion County ..................................................................................................................................................................206
Table 10-A: Clarion County Development Initiatives...............................................................................................207 Crawford County...............................................................................................................................................................208
Table 10-B: Crawford County Development Initiatives ...........................................................................................210 Erie County ........................................................................................................................................................................212
Table 10-C: Erie County Development Initiatives....................................................................................................215 Figure 10-A: Erie County 2030 Transportation Plan-Highway Network...................................................................217 Figure 10-B: Erie County 2030 Transportation Plan-Erie Urban Area ......................................................................218 Figure 10-C: Erie County-Keystone Zones ................................................................................................................219 Figure 10-D: Erie County-Wide Enterprise Zone Program ........................................................................................220 Figure 10-E: Erie County Plans for Land Use & Community Facilities ....................................................................221 Figure 10-F: Erie County Composite Local Zoning Districts....................................................................................222
Forest County.....................................................................................................................................................................223 Table 10-D: Forest County Development Initiatives.................................................................................................226
Lawrence County..............................................................................................................................................................227 Table 10-E: Lawrence County Development Initiatives...........................................................................................228
Mercer County...................................................................................................................................................................230 Table 10-F: Mercer County Development Initiatives ...............................................................................................235 Figure 10-G: Mercer County Future Land UseVenango County................................................................................237
Venango County.............................................................................................................................................................. 238 Table 10-G: Venango County Development Initiatives ............................................................................................239
Warren County ..................................................................................................................................................................240 Table 10-H: Warren County Development Initiatives...............................................................................................242
End-User Survey Response Data ................................................................................................. 243 Table 10-I: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – All Entities..............................................................................243 Table 10-J: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – Residential Entities .................................................................249 Table 10-K: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – Business Entities.....................................................................255 Table 10-L: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties School (K-12) Entities ...............................................................261 Table 10-N: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties Nonprofit Agency Entities.........................................................273 Table 10-O: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – Government Entities...............................................................279 Table 10-P: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – Health Care Facility Entities...................................................285 Table 10-Q: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – Other Entities.........................................................................291
Service Provider Survey Response Data....................................................................................... 297 Table 10-R: Service Provider Survey By: All 19 Survey Respondents ...................................................................297
USGS Maps ............................................................................................................................... 307 Figures 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, and 2-H (Located at end of Supplemental Report)......................................................................307
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 114
Section 9: Additional Case Studies
Case Studies Utilizing Various Types of Business Models
Big Sandy Telecommunications Center
Project Location: Pikeville, Kentucky Grant Recipient: Big Sandy Telecommuting Services, Inc./Pikeville College Total ARC Funding: $553,530 Total Matching Funds: $1,105,106
Prior to the ARC grant, very few businesses or residents in the Pikeville region had Internet access. In fact, there was no Internet service provider (ISP) in the region at the time the grant recipient applied for ARC funds. In addition to the lack of an ISP, most businesses and residents in Pikesville lacked access to training in the latest computer software programs. Given its isolated setting, there was also a desire to use the Internet and other forms of telecommunications technology, such as videoconferencing, to link schools, businesses, and community leaders with other communities in eastern Kentucky.
This project was primarily designed to provide a range of services to the businesses and residents of the five counties in the Big Sandy region of Kentucky. These included serving as an ISP, providing training and technical support in the use of the Internet and software, and building a telecommunications access site equipped with computers and videoconferencing equipment. Although the original ARC grant was designed to support a wide range of activities, much of the effort focused on establishing and maintaining the community's only ISP.
In serving as the region's first ISP, the project connected over 750 customers to the Internet. In addition, through the project’s training and telecommunications acquisitions, community businesses, educational institutions, and residents were exposed to new and emerging technologies. While this might have occurred without the ARC project, many felt that the ARC project accelerated this process. There are now 4-6 ISPs in the region, which are staffed or managed by people who received training or were exposed to the Internet through the project. In addition, the entire Big Sandy area was recently upgraded with a fiber optic backbone, which would not have been possible if not for the ARC grant and the resulting use of the Internet throughout the region.
Over the life of the ARC grant, over 700 people participated in classes on computer skills and applications. Because of the project, these professionals were able to take advantage of continuing education opportunities without leaving the community. People who attended BSTSI training are now employed in numerous businesses and educational institutions practicing the skills learned at BSTSI. Finally, the region has experienced increases in business productivity and job security, and several businesses had located in the region in part because they were able to find employees who had computer skills obtained through BSTSI.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 115
Medical and Government Internet Coalition Network (MAGICNET)
Project Location: Athens, Ohio Grant Recipient: Ohio University Total ARC Funding: $77,167 Total Matching Funds: $149,168
The primary goal of the Medical and Government Internet Coalition Network (MAGICnet) was to provide rural physicians and government officials access to "local services, state resources, and global connectivity" through the Internet. Toward this end, Ohio University’s College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) and Institute for Local Government Administration and Rural Development (ILGARD) provided project participants with hardware, software, training, implementation assistance, and one year's worth of Internet access. COM and ILGARD also assisted local Internet service providers (ISPs) in expanding their service to underserved areas of southeast Ohio.
Project participants have taken advantage of the capacity-building opportunities made possible through the MAGICnet project. Sites have been able to institute computerized billing systems, saving time and money. Internet access has provided sites with access to a wealth of information, such as inter- library loan services for physicians and federal and state grant opportunities for government sites. Members of the community have received better service as a result. Physicians can access patient education materials online and print and disseminate them to their patients. Government officials can provide services in a timelier manner and can use technology to gain information, which makes their grant applications more competitive. The ISP situation has changed dramatically as well, with more competing ISPs and choices for service.
Recognizing the impact of technology, many sites have taken the initiative to upgrade their equipment and expand their vision of how they can use technology. As an example, some local governments have expressed an interest in learning Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which can be used for resource management and community planning and development.
N-Logue’s Rural Connectivity Model
Although among the top 10 largest networks in the world and the third largest among developing countries, India currently has only a teledensity of 2.5 per 100 persons (1). With development resources directed primarily towards the urban areas, rural populations conceal a strong latent demand for connectivity and communication access. Yet rough terrain, absent or decaying infrastructure, dispersed populations, and low per-capita incomes continue to ward off both public and private sector investment.
Business Model - Where others see obstacles, Indian start-up n-Logue Communications sees opportunity. N-Logue has created a for-profit business model to tap into this latent rural demand for connectivity. N-Logue was incubated by the Telecommunications and Computer Network (TeNet) Group of the Indian Institute of Technology in Madras as part of the institute's strategy for developing and disseminating innovative, affordable communication technologies to the rural
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 116
poor of developing countries. N-Logue has fashioned a franchise-based business model that consists of three levels of interdependent networks. At the foundation- level, n-Logue forges and facilitates relationships among a wide-range of organizations—hardware and equipment providers, non-governmental organizations, content providers, and government—that enable and support the businesses of franchise owners. At the next level, n-Logue maintains a regional network of franchised Local Service Partners (LSP). The LSP works in tandem with n-Logue to set up an Access Center or node to which individual kiosk operators will be connected. At the highest level of the business model, local entrepreneurs are recruited by the LSP to establish village-level kiosk franchises that provide Internet and telephone access to the local population. Through the LSP, n-Logue offers low-priced "kiosk packages" consisting of a subscriber wall set (that connects the kiosk to the Access Center), a computer, printer and backup battery. The kiosks essentially function as combination rural Internet cafes and pay phone booths. While n-Logue provides kiosk owners with training, support, and technical assistance, local franchise owners themselves are responsible for developing additional product and service offerings (e.g., computer courses) and marketing strategies.
Infrastructure - N-Logue employs a unique, TeNet-designed Wireless Local Loop technology as the basis for its village- level communications package. This CorDECT technology consists of a fixed wireless local loop (WLL). CorDECT operates on the same principles as regular wireless technology with voice and data communication moving through radio frequency rather than wires. With WLL a fixed unit emits the originating signal. The CorDECT system provides voice, voice band FAX/DATA transfer and Internet connectivity at 35-70 Kbps to 1 Gbps when digitized. The subscriber wall set (WS-IP) can transmit both voice and data signals simultaneously to an access center, which must be located within a 25km line of sight distance. CorDECT technology effectively and inexpensively addresses the problems of distance and lack of infrastructure in rural areas. Installing a fixed wireless local loop does not require expensive digging, and the system consists of only 4 major components. Because the central base station/ direct interface unit (CBS/DIU) handles traffic from 200-1000 subscribers, it works ideally in small, dispersed markets and does not require the large subscriber base that traditional landline or cellular systems require for profitability. This low infrastructure investment, combined with low usage costs, makes the proposition affordable both for suppliers and customers in capital-constrained economies. Human Capacity - N-Logue offers training and business advisory services to its franchisees at the kiosk and LSP level. To find qualified kiosk operators, it has drawn from the large pool of graduates from India's many technical/computer institutes. It has been less successful in recruiting entrepreneurs at the LSP level, but recently has restructured and accelerated that process. N-Logue's own management consists of mature executives with extensive experience in the telecommunications sector and in sales, marketing, and business development for multinationals and blue chip Indian companies.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 117
Enterprise - The following factors enhance the sustainability of n-Logue's business model: « income generation at the local level « cost effective technology « decentralized organizational structure « local adaptability « local accountability
To implement its model, n-Logue has forged partnerships with an impressive network of organizations and entrepreneurs. To gain access to the long-haul telephone network and Internet backbone, n-Logue has negotiated relationships with BSNL, the former Department of Transportation monopoly, and Satyam Infoway, India's primary bandwidth provider. To facilitate entrepreneurs' access to capital, it has partnered with financial institutions such as the National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) and Indian Bank. It has overcome the barrier of expensive hardware through its relationships with IIT incubated R&D and manufacturing companies and by obtaining volume discounts with suppliers. N-Logue's partnerships with entrepreneurs form the crux of its business. Local service providers (LSPs), who are usually established businesspeople or district governments, maintain access centers and recruit kiosk operators. LSPs provide training, business advisory services, and collect the revenues from the kiosk operators, which are then passed on to n-Logue. Kiosk operators develop and market their own business offerings. To date, most kiosk operators have generated the largest portions of their revenue from net-based services, computer education and job work.
Key Lessons - N-Logue's success in its pilot phase and the headway it has made towards resolving national and regional licensing and regulatory issues can be attributed to the strong relationships it established with influence makers, governments, other businesses and entrepreneurs. It has leveraged these relationships to overcome a host of obstacles ranging from capital constraints to expensive hardware to lack of relevant content. The company will need strong infusions of cash to meet its growth projections. Fortunately it has many of the other necessary inputs for growth in place. The enthusiastic response to the business opportunity of kiosk ownership and the innovation kiosk operators have demonstrated in developing their businesses have exceeded the most optimistic expectations of n-Logue managers. By developing a business that is locally adaptable and locally accountable, n-Logue has positioned itself to successfully tap into an enormous latent demand for connectivity in rural India.
Buffalo, Minnesota
Buffalo, Minnesota, a growing town of 12,000, decided to install a control and data acquisition system for its electric utility, so adding a few more strands of fiber for data transmission seemed an easy option for broadband connectivity for the community. However, demand suddenly
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 118
increased from both residential and business users in the area. Since 90 percent of those in demand were not on the planned fiber route, and extending fiber to them was far too costly for the town to absorb, Buffalo decided to find another way to reach those demanding service.
Buffalo partnered with wireless equipment provider WaveRider Communications, Inc. and decided to become its own Internet Service Provider (ISP). The town is currently installing a non- line-of-sight (NLOS) broadband fixed wireless system that it hopes will reach about 1,700 homes and business, or about 60 percent of the available market.
Buffalo plans a two-phase rollout. The first phase is now complete and cost $180,000. This included the construction of three wireless towers. Residential users within one kilometer (five-eighths of a mile) of each tower pay $29.99 a month for 128 kilobits/ second for access. Business users can purchase speeds up to 256 kilobits/sec at a higher price. The second phase will require the construction of five more towers and will cost about $300,000. The town anticipates a four-year return on the total $480,000 investment.
Residential service started in late 2001. Over 125 customers had signed up by mid-January 2001, and two to three new subscribers sign up each day. According to Merton Auger, the city administrator, people looking to buy homes or set up businesses in Buffalo, just 26 miles from Minneapolis/St. Paul, are already asking if properties are located inside the high-speed Internet areas.
Grant County, Washington
The Grant County Public Utility District (GCPUD), a municipally owned public electric utility, has deployed a Fiber to the Home (FTTH) network in the city of Ephrata in Central Washington. The project, called ZIPP, includes a municipal fiber network and an all- fiber local access network. The utility deploys and operates the ZIPP fiber network, while independent service providers contract with the GCPUD to offer Internet access, voice, and video over the network.
In 1998, the utility began deploying a fiber network connecting the electric generating plants, power substations, and office buildings together for monitoring purposes. Once the utility points were connected, GCPUD decided to extend the network into a fiber ring and offer excess capacity to other businesses and organizations, including individual homes. The fiber ring was completed in 2000. The utility uses the network to offer advanced services such as automated metering and monitoring, and then leases the excess capacity to telecommunications service providers. In August of 2000, the utility started operating the network on a trial basis, serving 100 homes and 30 businesses. The FTTH network connects to the ZIPP municipal fiber ring and then connects through the Northwest Open Access Network (NoaNET) to a major Internet Point of Presence (PoP) located in the Westin building in Seattle.
The utility began deploying the network only to homes that had ordered the services. However, they decided to gradually deploy the network to all of the homes for a given stage of deployment since the fiber splicing and resealing process was so expensive. As of June 2000, network cabling was placed near 3,700 homes and businesses. The plan was to deploy the network to
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 119
8,000 homes and businesses by the end of 2001 and complete coverage to all sites (approximately 40,000) in the next three to five years.
The project is financed by the utility’s capital budget. The first stage of the project has cost around $12 million and the total cost is estimated to be $130 million over the next three to five years. The utility estimates that it will pay $35 to 40 million of the total cost and that revenues will cover the rest of the costs. Equipment installed on a customer’s premises costs approximately $1,000 per subscriber, but consumers only pay the utility a one-time connection fee of $300 and an ongoing monthly fee of $40 to use the network. Subscribers choose their own service provider from four Internet Service Providers in the community. They provide symmetric broadband Internet access at 100 Mbps, with monthly fees ranging from $9 to $25 a month. A digital TV service with 120 channels and video-on-demand began on a trial basis in the summer of 2001.
Jacksonville, Florida
Jacksonville, Florida is a thriving community that boasts state-of-the-art fiber-optic connections in many of its downtown businesses, but the city wanted to find a way to get affordable broadband access to community centers in poor neighborhoods and economic development zones outside the downtown area. The city plans to conduct a pilot project over the next year that would create wireless zones across the region based on the 802.11b wireless local area network standard. Anyone within a defined Wireless Internet Zone (WIZ) created using 802.11b connections can access the Internet at speeds of up to 11 megabits/sec.
The city's first WIZ began operating in late 2001 as a technology proof-of-concept at Jacksonville Landing, a retail, restaurant and amusement center located on Jacksonville's downtown riverfront. Anyone with an appropriately equipped laptop or handheld computer can access the Internet within that zone, free of charge. As WIZ expands, the city may charge a small fee for access. WIZ will reach about 80 percent of the people in areas that want broadband services but cannot otherwise afford them. A WIZ can be installed for about an eighth of the price for a comparable wired solution.
Pocahontas, Iowa
Adopting the most appropriate (and sometimes innovative) technology can overcome many cost or deployment hurdles for rural areas. The most appropriate technology also takes into account demand factors, leading to higher take rates by consumers.
Pocahontas, Iowa, a community of approximately 2000 people, turned to a wireless system provider after being told that Qwest was not interested in providing broadband service. Rather than spending $4 million upgrading the town’s cable system for broadband, Pocahontas chose a multipoint microwave distribution system (MMDS) for an initial investment of only $32,000. The system is based on recently developed non- line-of-sight technology, which provides greater flexibility and quicker installation, but less bandwidth, than older line-of-sight systems. The
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 120
system from Evertek Inc. provides MMDS technology in the 2.1 to 2.7 Ghz frequency range, allowing a single radio tower to cover a 35-mile radius.86 The city splits the monthly customer revenue with Evertek and expects to recoup their initial investment within three years.
Pocahontas is able to supply 512 Kbps downloads to customers for a $29.95 monthly fee. This is a broadband value proposition that seems to be hitting home with area residents. Around 20% of the town’s 900 households have signed up for the service, which has only been available since December of 2001. City Administrator Greg Fritz notes that the relatively low cost is the key to the system’s success. The lowest cost using a line-of-sight option would have been $45 per month for 128 Kbps service and $99 per month for businesses to receive 256 Kbps. Pocahontas charges the same price for business and residential and has 20% of the area businesses signed up as well. The 20% take rates for both residential and business customers are nearly double the national rate, which seems to confirm the importance of a broadband price point of approximately $30.
Stockholm, Sweden
The City of Stockholm believed broadband capacity would create an educated workforce, a prosperous economy, and an attractive lifestyle for its residents. In 1994, the city chartered a company called Stokab to build and manage a publicly owned, open-access fiber-optic network in the city that would provide dark fiber to telecommunications operators and other users at cost. Stockholm did not want multiple providers repetitively digging up its streets, so the city granted access to its ducts and tunnels. Stokab hung fiber-optic cable in the subways, and pulled it alongside steam and water pipes, electric cables, and sewer lines.
The City of Stockholm also realized it was cheaper and more practical for providers to lease Stokab fiber, than build their own networks. Stokab supplies dark fiber to carriers and resellers, who terminate and light their own fiber and supply all services above the fiber layer. Stokab is not involved in customer premises wiring. Any provider can use the network to deliver their services, allowing providers to customize their services for a specific customer. Customers of the Stokab network include telecom operators, Internet Service Providers, cable television networks, mobile telephone operators, municipalities, county councils, major banks, insurance companies, and the new media companies.
Under Swedish law, municipality-owned companies are operated to benefit the citizens and not to make a profit, so Stokab does not compete with the private sector. This increases competition among operators and thereby benefits business enterprise in the region. The users pay an access fee to use the network.
The Stokab fiber optic network began in the commercial districts of central Stockholm and the large industrial areas around Stockholm. In 1999, the network covered most of the central city and included public schools, libraries, district administrations, and industrial, office, and business centers in Stockholm. Based on the Stokab model, the Swedish Government is considering funding programs to assist municipalities in deploying open-access fiber infrastructure to every home, school, library, and business in the country. Sweden, working with the regional
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 121
municipalities, has accepted responsibility for planning and coordination of a nationwide fiber optic network.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 122
Troy, New Hampshire The Troy Industrial Development Authority, seeking an innovative way to level the playing field, is creating a cooperative entity to provide broadband services. Subscribers would pay a town broadband entity, which would in turn pay a service provider. Since most providers don’t handle small business or residential users and Troy has a number of people who’d like higher bandwidth at more affordable prices, Troy officials are seeking to join Monadnock Connect as a town aggregate, not as an individual business. This project was in progress as of December 1, 2001, and attempts to serve all in the community. Digital Rivers
The Digital Rivers project in the Pittsburgh region is a comprehensive example of what can be done to gain an understanding of the market for broadband services.87 It focuses on the urban Pittsburgh area, but the demand analysis expands into surrounding rural counties. This project covers all the essentials for aligning broadband supply and demand factors. Broadband projects of this scope would serve greatly to enhance the broadband environment for any city. But short of replicating such a project, much can be applied to other areas from the Digital Rivers experience.
The major aspects of the project include the following:
« Status of local infrastructure « Area demographics « Cost analysis of various technologies and deployment « Survey of early adopters and unmet demand (county by county) « Analysis of current telecommunications environment, including the best practices of
others « Impediments to deployment « Implementation strategies « Pilot project
3 Rivers Connect (3rc) played a large role in the Digital Rivers project as well as the follow-up efforts based on the results of the project. 3rc, a non-profit organization, describes itself as a “project-oriented group (aiming) to provide broad, visionary leadership in the development of Western Pennsylvania’s information infrastructure.” One broadband deployment effort in Pittsburgh was implemented by 3rc, along with technology partner, Proxicast, LLC. Four different community improvement associations’ buildings were the first to be interconnected using Nokia Rooftop Wireless technology. Rooftop Wireless is a fixed wireless, mesh networking solution, which, in this case, delivers service speeds of 512 Kbps. The cost is approximately one-third of an equivalent speed DSL connection. The Digital River report points out that the Rooftop Wireless system is a competitive broadband technology for urban or suburban settings but is not suitable for areas where the number of houses per square mile is less than about 175. The ideal setting would be approximately 40 subscribers in a 1.5-mile radius. The Rooftop Wireless technology is one of several technological deployments considered by 3rc as they examine the various cost/performance tradeoffs for each community.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 123
The Digital Rivers project was a joint effort including state and local government, university and private resources. Carnegie Mellon University provided a great deal of expertise in cooperation with the Alleghany County Department of Economic Development, the Pennsylvania Technology Investment Authority and the Howard Heinz Endowment. An advisory group also included input from the Army National Guard, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center and Redleaf Inc. Finally, there was a large group of stakeholders with direct interest in the region’s broadband capabilities. This included local and national companies, the City of Pittsburgh, and other interest groups. It takes an alignment of goals from all these groups in order to meet the broadband needs of communities.
Wireless Internet Zone
The Wireless Internet Zone in Jacksonville, Florida is one example of a project, which incorporates broadband access, computers, where needed, and training to maximize use of the technology. City officials and community activists are bringing wireless Internet connectivity to two low income neighborhoods. The recent emergence of low cost Wi-Fi wireless technology is making such broadband Internet deployments more feasible. The Internet zones cover two different community areas with wireless access. However, because Internet access cannot be accomplished without computers, they have also been made available to residents who need them through a combination of the Urban League, Humana and Florida’s Agency for Workforce Innovation. Awareness and education is also key; organizers stress the importance of getting the message out to local residents about what is now available. The larger goals for the project are to enhance literacy, workforce development, minority business development and voter education. The project is a joint effort by the City of Jacksonville, the Chamber of Commerce, the Urban League, BellSouth, and consulting firms, the Boardwalk Group, Connexsys, and the inc.well consulting group.
Thomasville, Georgia
Local efforts to aggregate organize and direct local demand can also accelerate the migration towards broadband adoption. Broadband efforts of regional municipalities can be combined in order to increase the scale of the operation. This provides more leverage in obtaining access to Internet backbone capacity and allows costs to be allocated more broadly. One example of this is occurring in rural Thomas County with a population of 43,000 in southern Georgia. Thomasville, the county seat, serves as the local cable head end and provides a broadband link to Camilla, Moultrie, and Cairo, Georgia. This broadband rollout was initiated through the Thomasville City Utility when the city could not talk anyone else into providing the service. Now that they are up and running, new competitors are starting to take the market more seriously, with the other local cable provider now upgrading its systems for broadband and a DSL competitor on the way.
Meanwhile, 50% to 60% of Thomasville’s residents have signed up for the new cable TV system and 47% of these customers have taken the cable modem service, called Rose.net. This works
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 124
out to an overall broadband penetration for the city of almost 25%. The secrets of success in this case are likely to be found in price and customer service. Rose.net service for cable TV customers begins at $28.95 per month for 256 Kbps and climbs to $53.95 for 1 Mbps. Customers who subscribe to the cable modem service alone pay $43.95 for the 256 Kbps offering.
Dedicated customer service seems to be another factor for the higher take rate. Taking into account that most customers likely have limited technical expertise as well as patience, cable modems are installed by support staff for every customer, the technical support number is a local call and the wait is negligible. Moreover, the charges are incorporated on monthly utility bills in a precise, understandable manner.
“Hometown Utilicom”-Kutztown, Pennsylvania
The Borough of Kutztown with a population of over 5,000 is located approximately 50 miles northwest of Philadelphia between the cities of Reading and Allentown and adjacent to Kutztown University with an enrollment of over 8,000 students. In 2002, Kutztown completed construction of a broadband telecommunications infrastructure and facilities with fiber-optic cabling to the home/business (FTTH) capable of providing numerous voice, video, and data services. The borough was successful in building public-private service partnerships for the provisioning of services across the system. Just some of the services include traditional voice services, 10-100 Mbps Internet connectivity, security services, community intranet services and television programming from the municipal-owned headend. Some future anticipated services include state-of-the-art video and music offerings including both video and music-on-demand and interactive television and virtual private networking. These new voice, video and data services join the already existing borough electric energy supply and management services, water supply and treatment services, wastewater collection and treatment services and resource management (solid waste and recycling) services to provide one stop shopping, diverse billing and payment options and a value added services approach to the customer. This type of system was very complimentary to the municipal-owned electric system due to utility pole ownership, right-of-way assignments, bucket truck and other needed equipment being available, and technically competent staff for construction, service and maintenance, as well as marketing and billing services. Kutztown is also implementing an Automated Meter Reading (AMR) system for utilities. These new services will join the Borough’s existing Geographic Information System (GIS) and Supervisory Controlled and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems in enhancing the development of Information Technologies (IT) of the Borough to better serve the propertie s and residents.
These services are marketed and billed under the registered service mark of “Hometown Utilicom”. Revenues stay within the community. Property owners and residents are not required to purchase any of the new services being offered, and the borough realizes that it must prove services are a benefit and competitive in cost to not only compete, but to justify municipal ownership of the system.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 125
A step-down star configuration passive optical network architecture was constructed to deliver converged voice, video and data services from the network operating center (NOC) or service control Point-of-Presence (POP) located in the municipal building to the customers’ premise. A fiber optics communication system was previously chosen for the utility’s SCADA system. The borough wanted to utilize future-proof technology to meet the high speed Internet and bandwidth demands and optical network solutions needed for additional services that will become available.
The borough has already discussed incorporating the Hometown Utilicom service industry with the Kutztown Main Street program, a downtown revitalization/reinvestment proposal. In addition, the borough is currently working on an economic development incentive initiative to attract commercial and industrial development along the Route 222 corridor to not only provide a basis for additional utility revenue, but to help relieve the growing school district tax burden on the constituents. The previously purchased Kutztown-Topton railroad spur by the borough may play a significant role in expanding services outside the Borough.
The borough felt that as a university host community, Kutztown’s needs to provide present and future adaptable technology to handle the needs of the information age is essential to remain attractive and viable to the students, as well as other residents who call Kutztown home.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 126
Section 10: Additional Exhibits
Demographics Data for Pennsylvania and by County
Pennsylvania Data
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Quick Tables Load Query | Save Query
DP-1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf1u.htm.
Subject Number Percent
Total population 12,281,054 100.0
SEX AND AGE Male 5,929,663 48.3 Female 6,351,391 51.7
Under 5 years 727,804 5.9 5 to 9 years 827,945 6.7 10 to 14 years 863,849 7.0 15 to 19 years 850,986 6.9 20 to 24 years 746,086 6.1 25 to 34 years 1,560,486 12.7 35 to 44 years 1,948,076 15.9 45 to 54 years 1,705,032 13.9 55 to 59 years 619,969 5.0 60 to 64 years 511,656 4.2 65 to 74 years 969,272 7.9 75 to 84 years 712,326 5.8 85 years and over 237,567 1.9
Median age (years) 38.0 (X)
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 127
Subject Number Percent
18 years and over 9,358,833 76.2
Male 4,430,102 36.1 Female 4,928,731 40.1
21 years and over 8,842,276 72.0 62 years and over 2,219,927 18.1 65 years and over 1,919,165 15.6
Male 767,547 6.2 Female 1,151,618 9.4
RACE One race 12,138,830 98.8
White 10,484,203 85.4 Black or African American 1,224,612 10.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 18,348 0.1 Asian 219,813 1.8
Asian Indian 57,241 0.5 Chinese 50,650 0.4 Filipino 14,506 0.1 Japanese 6,984 0.1 Korean 31,612 0.3 Vietnamese 30,037 0.2 Other Asian 1 28,783 0.2
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 3,417 0.0 Native Hawaiian 897 0.0 Guamanian or Chamorro 646 0.0 Samoan 734 0.0 Other Pacific Islander 2 1,140 0.0
Some other race 188,437 1.5 Two or more races 142,224 1.2
Race alone or in combination with one or more other races 3 White 10,596,409 86.3 Black or African American 1,289,123 10.5 American Indian and Alaska Native 52,650 0.4 Asian 248,601 2.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 8,790 0.1 Some other race 238,700 1.9
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
Total population 12,281,054 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 394,088 3.2
Mexican 55,178 0.4 Puerto Rican 228,557 1.9 Cuban 10,363 0.1 Other Hispanic or Latino 99,990 0.8
Not Hispanic or Latino 11,886,966 96.8 White alone 10,322,455 84.1
RELATIONSHIP
Total population 12,281,054 100.0 In households 11,847,753 96.5
Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0 Owner-occupied housing units 3,406,337 71.3 Renter-occupied housing units 1,370,666 28.7
Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.62 (X) Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.12 (X)
Subject Number Percent (X) Not applicable 1 Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. 2 Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices P1, P3, P4, P8, P9, P12, P13, P,17, P18, P19, P20, P23, P27, P28, P33, PCT5, PCT8, PCT11, PCT15, H1, H3, H4, H5, H11, and H12.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 129
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Quick Tables Load Query | Save Query
DP-2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania NOTE: Data based on a sample except in P3, P4, H3, and H4. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf3.htm.
Subject Number Percent
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
Population 3 years and over enrolled in school 3,135,934 100.0 Nursery school, preschool 203,934 6.5 Kindergarten 159,146 5.1 Elementary school (grades 1-8) 1,379,671 44.0 High school (grades 9-12) 690,020 22.0 College or graduate school 703,163 22.4
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over 8,266,284 100.0 Less than 9th grade 452,069 5.5 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,044,036 12.6 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 3,150,013 38.1 Some college, no degree 1,284,731 15.5 Associate degree 487,804 5.9 Bachelor's degree 1,153,383 14.0 Graduate or professional degree 694,248 8.4
Percent high school graduate or higher 81.9 (X) Percent bachelor's degree or higher 22.4 (X)
MARITAL STATUS
Population 15 years and over 9,861,713 100.0 Never married 2,685,328 27.2 Now married, except separated 5,352,297 54.3 Separated 215,846 2.2 Widowed 808,903 8.2
Female 656,381 6.7
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 130
Divorced 799,339 8.1
Female 456,801 4.6
GRANDPARENTS AS CAREGIVERS Grandparent living in household with one or more own grandchildren under 18 years 204,909 100.0
Grandparent responsible for grandchildren 80,423 39.2
VETERAN STATUS Civilian population 18 years and over 9,354,471 100.0
Civilian veterans 1,280,788 13.7
DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION Population 5 to 20 years 2,689,895 100.0
With a disability 202,259 7.5
Population 21 to 64 years 6,837,268 100.0 With a disability 1,196,717 17.5
Percent employed 54.8 (X) No disability 5,640,551 82.5
Percent employed 78.3 (X)
Population 65 years and over 1,809,320 100.0 With a disability 712,795 39.4
RESIDENCE IN 1995
Population 5 years and over 11,555,538 100.0 Same house in 1995 7,333,591 63.5 Different house in the U.S. in 1995 4,056,716 35.1
Same county 2,513,167 21.7 Different county 1,543,549 13.4
Same state 874,796 7.6 Different state 668,753 5.8
Elsewhere in 1995 165,231 1.4
NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH Total population 12,281,054 100.0
Native 11,772,763 95.9 Born in United States 11,620,495 94.6
State of residence 9,544,251 77.7 Different state 2,076,244 16.9
Born outside United States 152,268 1.2 Foreign born 508,291 4.1
Entered 1990 to March 2000 209,123 1.7 Naturalized citizen 257,339 2.1 Not a citizen 250,952 2.0
REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN
Total (excluding born at sea) 508,282 100.0 Europe 182,667 35.9 Asia 182,967 36.0 Africa 25,413 5.0 Oceania 2,178 0.4 Latin America 99,514 19.6 Northern America 15,543 3.1
LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Population 5 years and over 11,555,538 100.0 English only 10,583,054 91.6 Language other than English 972,484 8.4
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 131
Speak English less than "very well" 368,257 3.2 Spanish 356,754 3.1
Speak English less than "very well" 140,502 1.2 Other Indo-European languages 428,122 3.7
Speak English less than "very well" 138,542 1.2 Asian and Pacific Island languages 143,955 1.2
Speak English less than "very well" 76,183 0.7
ANCESTRY (single or multiple) Total population 12,281,054 100.0 Total ancestries reported 13,575,589 110.5
Arab 49,413 0.4 Czech1 70,704 0.6 Danish 16,762 0.1 Dutch 255,373 2.1 English 966,253 7.9 French (except Basque)1 211,264 1.7 French Canadian1 31,769 0.3 German 3,115,560 25.4 Greek 56,911 0.5 Hungarian 132,184 1.1 Irish1 1,983,262 16.1 Italian 1,418,465 11.6 Lithuanian 78,330 0.6 Norwegian 38,869 0.3 Polish 824,146 6.7 Portuguese 13,566 0.1 Russian 178,855 1.5 Scotch-Irish 218,173 1.8 Scottish 185,163 1.5 Slovak 243,009 2.0 Subsaharan African 58,807 0.5 Swedish 105,525 0.9 Swiss 60,107 0.5 Ukrainian 122,291 1.0 United States or American 633,236 5.2 Welsh 182,289 1.5 West Indian (excluding Hispanic groups) 36,396 0.3 Other ancestries 2,288,907 18.6
Subject Number Percent (X) Not applicable. 1 The data represent a combination of two ancestries shown separately in Summary File 3. Czech includes Czechoslovakian. French includes Alsatian. French Canadian includes Acadian/Cajun. Irish includes Celtic. Ancestry Code List (PDF 35KB) Place of Birth Code List (PDF 74KB) Language Code List (PDF 17KB) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 3, Matrices P18, P19, P21, P22, P24, P36, P37, P39, P42, PCT8, PCT16, PCT17, and PCT19
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 132
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Quick Tables Load Query | Save Query
DP-3. Profile of Selected Economic Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania NOTE: Data based on a sample except in P3, P4, H3, and H4. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf3.htm.
Subject Number Percent
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Population 16 years and over 9,693,040 100.0 In labor force 6,000,512 61.9
Percent of civilian labor force 5.7 (X) Armed Forces 7,626 0.1
Not in labor force 3,692,528 38.1
Females 16 years and over 5,094,133 100.0 In labor force 2,818,832 55.3
Civilian labor force 2,817,741 55.3 Employed 2,660,720 52.2
Own children under 6 years 845,915 100.0
All parents in family in labor force 508,870 60.2
COMMUTING TO WORK Workers 16 years and over 5,556,311 100.0
Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 4,247,836 76.5 Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 577,364 10.4 Public transportation (including taxicab) 289,699 5.2 Walked 229,725 4.1 Other means 47,041 0.8 Worked at home 164,646 3.0 Mean travel time to work (minutes) 25.2 (X)
Employed civilian population 16 years and over 5,653,500 100.0
OCCUPATION
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 133
Subject Number Percent Management, professional, and related occupations 1,841,175 32.6 Service occupations 838,137 14.8 Sales and office occupations 1,525,131 27.0 Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations 26,722 0.5 Construction, extraction, and maintenance occupations 500,898 8.9 Production, transportation, and material moving occupations 921,437 16.3
INDUSTRY Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 73,459 1.3 Construction 339,363 6.0 Manufacturing 906,398 16.0 Wholesale trade 201,084 3.6 Retail trade 684,179 12.1 Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 304,335 5.4 Information 148,841 2.6 Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental and leasing 372,148 6.6 Professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management services 478,937 8.5 Educational, health and social services 1,237,090 21.9 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food services 397,871 7.0 Other services (except public administration) 274,028 4.8 Public administration 235,767 4.2
CLASS OF WORKER Private wage and salary workers 4,657,372 82.4 Government workers 639,088 11.3 Self-employed workers in own not incorporated business 339,631 6.0 Unpaid family workers 17,409 0.3
INCOME IN 1999
Households 4,779,186 100.0 Less than $10,000 465,860 9.7 $10,000 to $14,999 333,381 7.0 $15,000 to $24,999 657,266 13.8 $25,000 to $34,999 633,953 13.3 $35,000 to $49,999 809,165 16.9 $50,000 to $74,999 929,863 19.5 $75,000 to $99,999 457,480 9.6 $100,000 to $149,999 317,171 6.6 $150,000 to $199,999 84,173 1.8 $200,000 or more 90,874 1.9 Median household income (dollars) 40,106 (X)
With earnings 3,667,238 76.7
Mean earnings (dollars) 54,209 (X) With Social Security income 1,451,386 30.4
Mean Social Security income (dollars) 11,717 (X) With Supplemental Security Income 203,851 4.3
Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars) 6,523 (X) With public assistance income 149,203 3.1
Mean public assistance income (dollars) 2,848 (X) With retirement income 940,184 19.7
Mean retirement income (dollars) 14,663 (X)
Families 3,225,707 100.0 Less than $10,000 167,090 5.2 $10,000 to $14,999 124,473 3.9 $15,000 to $24,999 352,867 10.9 $25,000 to $34,999 410,489 12.7
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 134
Subject Number Percent $35,000 to $49,999 586,011 18.2 $50,000 to $74,999 756,698 23.5 $75,000 to $99,999 396,388 12.3 $100,000 to $149,999 278,306 8.6 $150,000 to $199,999 74,520 2.3 $200,000 or more 78,865 2.4 Median family income (dollars) 49,184 (X)
Per capita income (dollars) 20,880 (X) Median earnings (dollars): Male full-time, year-round workers 37,051 (X) Female full-time, year-round workers 26,687 (X)
18 years and over 882,372 (X) Percent below poverty level (X) 9.8
65 years and over 164,095 (X) Percent below poverty level (X) 9.1
Related children under 18 years 408,079 (X) Percent below poverty level (X) 14.3
Related children 5 to 17 years 291,913 (X) Percent below poverty level (X) 13.6
Unrelated individuals 15 years and over 473,182 (X) Percent below poverty level (X) 22.8
Subject Number Percent (X) Not applicable. Detailed Occupation Code List (PDF 42KB) Detailed Industry Code List (PDF 44KB) User note on employment status data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 3, Matrices P30, P32, P33, P43, P46, P49, P50, P51, P52, P53, P58, P62, P63, P64, P65, P67, P71, P72, P73, P74, P76, P77, P82, P87, P90, PCT47, PCT52, and PCT53
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 135
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Quick Tables
Load Query | Save Query
DP-4. Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3) - Sample Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania NOTE: Data based on a sample except in P3, P4, H3, and H4. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf3.htm.
Subject Number Percent
Total housing units 5,249,750 100.0
UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1-unit, detached 2,935,248 55.9 1-unit, attached 940,396 17.9 2 units 273,798 5.2 3 or 4 units 241,745 4.6 5 to 9 units 179,909 3.4 10 to 19 units 131,691 2.5 20 or more units 283,714 5.4 Mobile home 258,551 4.9 Boat, RV, van, etc. 4,698 0.1
YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT 1999 to March 2000 66,916 1.3 1995 to 1998 212,916 4.1 1990 to 1994 266,445 5.1 1980 to 1989 531,986 10.1 1970 to 1979 709,768 13.5 1960 to 1969 595,897 11.4 1940 to 1959 1,275,149 24.3 1939 or earlier 1,590,673 30.3
ROOMS 1 room 62,654 1.2
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT 1999 to March 2000 696,279 14.6 1995 to 1998 1,139,483 23.9 1990 to 1994 734,248 15.4 1980 to 1989 821,152 17.2 1970 to 1979 575,344 12.0 1969 or earlier 810,497 17.0
VEHICLES AVAILABLE None 613,249 12.8 1 1,667,535 34.9 2 1,791,526 37.5 3 or more 704,693 14.8
HOUSE HEATING FUEL Utility gas 2,452,941 51.3 Bottled, tank, or LP gas 145,254 3.0 Electricity 786,648 16.5 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 1,217,155 25.5 Coal or coke 67,986 1.4 Wood 76,060 1.6 Solar energy 663 0.0 Other fuel 20,500 0.4 No fuel used 9,796 0.2
SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Lacking complete plumbing facilities 24,450 0.5 Lacking complete kitchen facilities 25,831 0.5 No telephone service 65,680 1.4
OCCUPANTS PER ROOM
Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0 1.00 or less 4,685,858 98.1 1.01 to 1.50 60,627 1.3 1.51 or more 30,518 0.6
Specified owner-occupied units 2,889,484 100.0
VALUE Less than $50,000 435,193 15.1 $50,000 to $99,999 1,079,698 37.4 $100,000 to $149,999 703,093 24.3 $150,000 to $199,999 344,172 11.9 $200,000 to $299,999 214,812 7.4 $300,000 to $499,999 84,425 2.9 $500,000 to $999,999 23,654 0.8 $1,000,000 or more 4,437 0.2 Median (dollars) 97,000 (X)
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 137
MORTGAGE STATUS AND SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS With a mortgage 1,798,402 62.2
Less than $300 9,157 0.3 $300 to $499 108,720 3.8 $500 to $699 270,083 9.3 $700 to $999 498,003 17.2 $1,000 to $1,499 546,365 18.9 $1,500 to $1,999 220,493 7.6 $2,000 or more 145,581 5.0 Median (dollars) 1,010 (X)
Not mortgaged 1,091,082 37.8 Median (dollars) 318 (X)
SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999
Less than 15 percent 1,091,368 37.8 15 to 19 percent 509,245 17.6 20 to 24 percent 399,694 13.8 25 to 29 percent 264,015 9.1 30 to 34 percent 164,558 5.7 35 percent or more 436,159 15.1 Not computed 24,445 0.8
Specified renter-occupied units 1,348,824 100.0
GROSS RENT Less than $200 85,346 6.3 $200 to $299 89,493 6.6 $300 to $499 389,144 28.9 $500 to $749 454,749 33.7 $750 to $999 167,064 12.4 $1,000 to $1,499 65,230 4.8 $1,500 or more 19,811 1.5 No cash rent 77,987 5.8 Median (dollars) 531 (X)
GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 Less than 15 percent 259,386 19.2 15 to 19 percent 193,612 14.4 20 to 24 percent 165,624 12.3 25 to 29 percent 139,877 10.4 30 to 34 percent 93,260 6.9 35 percent or more 386,384 28.6 Not computed 110,681 8.2
Subject Number Percent (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 3, Matrices H1, H7, H20, H23, H24, H30, H34, H38, H40, H43, H44, H48, H51, H62, H63, H69, H74, H76, H90, H91, and H94
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 138
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Quick Tables Load Query | Save Query
QT-H1. General Housing Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf1u.htm.
Subject
Number
Percent
OCCUPANCY STATUS
Total housing units 5,249,750 100.0 Occupied housing units 4,777,003 91.0 Vacant housing units 472,747 9.0
TENURE
Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0 Owner-occupied housing units 3,406,337 71.3 Renter-occupied housing units 1,370,666 28.7
VACANCY STATUS
Vacant housing units 472,747 100.0 For rent 105,585 22.3 For sale only 55,891 11.8 Rented or sold, not occupied 37,494 7.9 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 148,230 31.4 For migratory workers 386 0.1 Other vacant 125,161 26.5
RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER
Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0 One race 4,739,424 99.2
White 4,177,452 87.4 Black or African American 435,073 9.1 American Indian and Alaska Native 6,580 0.1 Asian 67,792 1.4 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 873 0.0 Some other race 51,654 1.1
Two or more races 37,579 0.8
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 139
Subject
Number
Percent
HISPANIC OR LATINO HOUSEHOLDER AND RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 108,653 2.3 Not Hispanic or Latino 4,668,350 97.7
White alone 4,131,414 86.5
AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER Occupied housing units 4,777,003 100.0
15 to 24 years 193,732 4.1 25 to 34 years 718,454 15.0 35 to 44 years 1,026,107 21.5 45 to 54 years 960,175 20.1 55 to 64 years 664,011 13.9 65 years and over 1,214,524 25.4
65 to 74 years 609,711 12.8 75 to 84 years 473,841 9.9 85 years and over 130,972 2.7
Subject
Number
Percent
(X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, and H16.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 140
County Data
Main | Search | Feedback | FAQs | Glossary
Geographic Comparison Table Load Query | Save Query
GCT-PH1. Population, Housing Units, Area, and Density: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data Geographic Area: Pennsylvania – County NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf1u.htm.
Area in square miles
Density per square mile of land area
Geographic area
Population
Housing
units
Total area
Water
area
Land area
Population
Housing
units Pennsylvania 12,281,054 5,249,750 46,055.24 1,238.63 44,816.61 274.0 117.1
COUNTY Adams County 91,292 35,831 521.52 1.51 520.01 175.6 68.9 Allegheny County 1,281,666 583,646 744.71 14.54 730.17 1,755.3 799.3 Armstrong County 72,392 32,387 664.44 10.51 653.93 110.7 49.5 Beaver County 181,412 77,765 443.90 9.69 434.21 417.8 179.1 Bedford County 49,984 23,529 1,017.40 2.89 1,014.51 49.3 23.2 Berks County 373,638 150,222 865.67 6.79 858.88 435.0 174.9 Blair County 129,144 55,061 527.11 1.31 525.80 245.6 104.7 Bradford County 62,761 28,664 1,161.03 10.37 1,150.67 54.5 24.9 Bucks County 597,635 225,498 622.11 14.74 607.38 984.0 371.3 Butler County 174,083 69,868 794.79 6.26 788.53 220.8 88.6 Cambria County 152,598 65,796 693.43 5.41 688.02 221.8 95.6 Cameron County 5,974 4,592 398.60 1.44 397.16 15.0 11.6 Carbon County 58,802 30,492 387.23 6.20 381.04 154.3 80.0 Centre County 135,758 53,161 1,111.85 4.32 1,107.53 122.6 48.0 Chester County 433,501 163,773 759.81 3.84 755.97 573.4 216.6 Clarion County 41,765 19,426 608.95 6.51 602.44 69.3 32.2 Clearfield County 83,382 37,855 1,153.80 6.49 1,147.32 72.7 33.0 Clinton County 37,914 18,166 898.09 7.23 890.87 42.6 20.4 Columbia County 64,151 27,733 489.79 4.24 485.55 132.1 57.1 Crawford County 90,366 42,416 1,037.74 25.01 1,012.72 89.2 41.9 Cumberland County 213,674 86,951 551.14 0.98 550.17 388.4 158.0 Dauphin County 251,798 111,133 557.53 32.24 525.29 479.4 211.6 Delaware County 550,864 216,978 190.74 6.53 184.21 2,990.4 1,177.9
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 141
Area in square miles
Density per square mile of land area
Geographic area
Population
Housing
units
Total area
Water
area
Land area
Population
Housing
units Elk County 35,112 18,115 832.23 3.58 828.65 42.4 21.9 Erie County 280,843 114,322 1,558.40 756.46 801.95 350.2 142.6 Fayette County 148,644 66,490 798.00 7.86 790.14 188.1 84.1 Forest County 4,946 8,701 431.40 3.28 428.12 11.6 20.3 Franklin County 129,313 53,803 772.63 0.71 771.92 167.5 69.7 Fulton County 14,261 6,790 438.03 0.46 437.57 32.6 15.5 Greene County 40,672 16,678 577.95 2.09 575.86 70.6 29.0 Huntingdon County 45,586 21,058 889.03 14.98 874.05 52.2 24.1 Indiana County 89,605 37,250 834.29 5.02 829.27 108.1 44.9 Jefferson County 45,932 22,104 656.87 1.39 655.48 70.1 33.7 Juniata County 22,821 10,031 393.57 1.98 391.59 58.3 25.6 Lackawanna County 213,295 95,362 464.51 5.88 458.63 465.1 207.9 Lancaster County 470,658 179,990 983.81 34.75 949.06 495.9 189.7 Lawrence County 94,643 39,635 362.76 2.30 360.46 262.6 110.0 Lebanon County 120,327 49,320 362.60 0.74 361.86 332.5 136.3 Lehigh County 312,090 128,910 348.34 1.68 346.66 900.3 371.9 Luzerne County 319,250 144,686 907.13 16.32 890.81 358.4 162.4 Lycoming County 120,044 52,464 1,243.77 8.91 1,234.85 97.2 42.5 McKean County 45,936 21,644 984.17 2.60 981.57 46.8 22.1 Mercer County 120,293 49,859 682.57 10.76 671.82 179.1 74.2 Mifflin County 46,486 20,745 414.60 2.75 411.86 112.9 50.4 Monroe County 138,687 67,581 617.42 8.92 608.50 227.9 111.1 Montgomery County 750,097 297,434 487.45 4.33 483.12 1,552.6 615.7 Montour County 18,236 7,627 132.30 1.55 130.75 139.5 58.3 Northampton County 267,066 106,710 377.36 3.56 373.80 714.5 285.5 Northumberland County 94,556 43,164 477.38 17.47 459.91 205.6 93.9 Perry County 43,602 18,941 555.77 2.25 553.52 78.8 34.2 Philadelphia County 1,517,550 661,958 142.64 7.55 135.09 11,233.6 4,900.1 Pike County 46,302 34,681 566.64 19.83 546.81 84.7 63.4 Potter County 18,080 12,159 1,081.42 0.25 1,081.17 16.7 11.2 Schuylkill County 150,336 67,806 782.61 4.25 778.36 193.1 87.1 Snyder County 37,546 14,890 332.16 0.95 331.20 113.4 45.0 Somerset County 80,023 37,163 1,081.17 6.51 1,074.66 74.5 34.6 Sullivan County 6,556 6,017 452.35 2.41 449.94 14.6 13.4 Susquehanna County 42,238 21,829 832.40 9.54 822.86 51.3 26.5 Tioga County 41,373 19,893 1,137.30 3.58 1,133.73 36.5 17.5 Union County 41,624 14,684 317.12 0.39 316.73 131.4 46.4 Venango County 57,565 26,904 683.02 7.98 675.04 85.3 39.9 Warren County 43,863 23,058 897.81 14.36 883.45 49.6 26.1 Washington County 202,897 87,267 860.95 3.86 857.09 236.7 101.8 Wayne County 47,722 30,593 750.54 21.32 729.22 65.4 42.0 Westmoreland County 369,993 161,058 1,036.34 10.86 1,025.48 360.8 157.1 Wyoming County 28,080 12,713 404.79 7.59 397.20 70.7 32.0 York County 381,751 156,720 910.25 5.80 904.45 422.1 173.3
Area in square miles
Density per square mile of land area
Geographic area Population
Housing
units
Total area
Water
area
Land area Population
Housing
units (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 206
Economic Development Initiatives Data by County
Clarion County
Clarion County Economic Development Corporation is planning development of Beaver Township Industrial Park, a 77-acre KOZ. Construction of the roads and utilities is expected to commence in Spring, 2002. Another 43-acre KOZ is being privately developed by Clarion Trinity Development Corporation as part of a 155-acre development, known as “Trinity Point”, in Monroe Township at I-80 Exit 62.
Clarion County will need some additional KOZ land.
Industrial land development in Clarion County is somewhat unique compared to many adjacent jurisdictions…Clarion County is attracting new large users, primarily in the manufactured home building industry.
These data shows that almost all of the new industrial land development in Clarion County is the result of new companies moving to the County from outside of the region, and thus representing new growth of the region.39
39 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 207
Table 10-A: Clarion County Development Initiatives
County Name of Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Clarion Clarion County Commerce Center
CL-1 Industrial Park (Planned for 2004)
I-80 Exit 53 St. Rt. 338 N. 2 miles
77 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
W,S,G 2004 KOZ; Access road available;
Clarion Near Castle Housing Industrial Park
CL-2 Industrial Park (Existing)
I-80 Exit 53 St. Rt. 338 N 4 miles
50 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
W, S
Only 4.5 acres available Castle Housing anchor tenant; Access road
CL-5 Health Facility (Existing 2003 and Planned 2nd phase)
I-80 Exit 62 St. Rt. 68
Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Existing 2 story cancer center; Second phase of 10,000 sf. On 3 rd level to expand clinical services
Clarion Clarion University Science Center & Dorm Village
CL-6 Instit utional (Planned)
I-80 Exit 62 St. Rt. 68N
DSL Capability New science center bldg. and dormitory village
Clarion Identified Industrial Growth Area
CL-7 Industrial (Planned)
I-80 Exit 64 St. Rt. 66S
No DSL or Cable Modem
Identified industrial growth area
Clarion Rt. 66 Growth Corridor
CL-
COR-8
Rt. 66 South-
bound to I-80
towards New
Bethlehem
No DSL or Cable Modem
Growth corridor
Clarion Rt. 28 Growth Corridor
CL-
COR-9
Rt. 28 from New Bethlehem to Hawthorn
Within Cable Modem and Partial DSL Capability
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 208
Crawford County
Crawford County has industrial parks with the KOZ designation and ready-to-build lots. Crawford County has several former manufacturing plants converted to multi-tenant facilities with KOZ designations, including the Talon Plant 7 in Meadville and Titusville Opportunity Park in Titusville.
Crawford County has five KOZ sites, including the largest KOZ in the region. Two KOZ sites are the reuse of manufacturing plants, while the others are industrial parks. All the sites are active.
Crawford County is in excellent position to generate increased industrial land development with 1,300 well-located acres of KOZ land. This total is high compared with the past trends and may suggest that Crawford will be a much more competitive location within the region and may attract some development that previously may have been attracted to Erie or Mercer County.
All the County’s industrial properties are in or near Meadville or at Titusville.
Within Crawford County (and other adjacent Counties) most industrial expansion is not new development on vacant land.41
Some of these characteristics may be seen as opportunities. The fact that the County is a net exporter of workers to Warren and Mercer Counties in Pennsylvania, and Trumbull and Ashtabula Counties in Ohio, suggests that the potential labor force for jobs in the County is fairly high. Furthermore, prevailing wages are quite low and the County is in a good competitive position to lure industries seeking an abundant pool of inexpensive labor. Conversely, the estimates for the 1990s are very encouraging, suggesting that the County is rebounding.42
Some needed transportation system improvements in Crawford County include enhancing access to various industrial sites, reducing congestion on Meadville’s North Street, better coordinating social service transportation, upgrading roads and access areas for wide-body trucks (102 inches), and diverting through truck traffic out of Meadville. As with many areas throughout Pennsylvania and the country, improved truck routes in Crawford County are needed to attract new industry, specifically east-west corridor travel routes between Meadville and Titusville. Based on business information from the Meadville-Titusville East-West Corridor Study and the 1973 Comprehensive Plan, road improvements to State Routes 27, 77, and 408 are desirable. Additionally, improvements to State Route 198 and the roads to the industrial zones west of Meadville are needed. Beyond enhancing the County’s transportation
41 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
42 Comprehensive Plan Phase II: Plan Elements for Crawford County, Pennsylvania, 1997-2000; Prepared by the: Crawford County Planning Commission and Richard C. Sutter & Associates, Inc., Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania and of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 209
network, such road improvements would increase the number of workers within a 30-minute commute of both Meadville and Titusville. This would be a significant business attraction.43
As the population has increased, residential development has spread out from the boroughs along existing roadways; primarily in the form of low-density, scattered single-family housing. Large development has occurred in the forms of intense commercial development along major transportation corridors, highway related commercial development, and tourist related commercial and seasonal housing. The redistribution of population over recent years indicates an increasing preference for a suburban or rural location as compared with housing within the boroughs. For financial reasons; - lower taxes and cheaper land - as well as some social reasons, families tend to move outward to newer areas, which are perceived by many to be more desirable. A large portion of the County’s land remains vacant or wooded; however, much of this land in the southern portion of the County is too steep for economical construction or any high-intensity use. At the present and for the next several decades, most of this wooded land is best reserved for watersheds and conservation purposes or for passive recreation areas. There remains potentially developable land immediately surrounding the already developed areas of the boroughs; however, the ever-increasing needs and demands upon the land, which will only be compounded in the future, make it imperative that growth throughout the County be properly guided.44
43 Comprehensive Plan Phase II: Plan Elements for Crawford County, Pennsylvania, 1997-2000; Prepared by the: Crawford County Planning Commission and Richard C. Sutter & Associates, Inc., Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania and of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
44 Comprehensive Plan Phase II: Plan Elements for Crawford County, Pennsylvania, 1997-2000; Prepared by the: Crawford County Planning Commission and Richard C. Sutter & Associates, Inc., Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania and of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 210
Table 10-B: Crawford County Development Initiatives
County Name of Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Crawford Crawford County Industrial Park (CCIP) (brownfield)
CR-1 Redevelopment light manufacturing warehousing office space, education/ training facility
French Creek Valley Enterprise Zone in Vernon Twp.
300 (35 acres under roof)
Comprehensive, OC 48, T-1, T-3, Frame relay, Ethernet, AGIS & UUNET (D53-45 Mbps); Greater Meadville Area Local Access Network (GREMLAN) Internet Hub Rm. At CCIP; Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
E,G,W,S existing
Regional Conference & Meeting Center (RCTC)-Globally interactive facilities; computer lab., conferencing & meeting rms., presentation center; Service providers-AllTel Tele., AT&T, Sprint, MCI, Armstrong Cable; Owned by CCDC Group; Approx. 800,000 sf of bldg. space redeveloped; 22 tenants employing 870 people
Crawford Crawford County Industrial Park West
CR-2 French Creek Valley Enterprise Zone
25 acres total, with 20 acres remaining for devel-opment
AllTEL Comm. & Armstrong Cable serving property; No broadband extended to site; Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Utility connections installed to properties fronting Mosiertown Rd.; Needed infrastructure for further dev.
All but 2 acres in KOEZ; Owned by CCDC Group; 22,000 sf bldg. w/offices and production areas ready for lease or sale (Bldg. not in KOEZ)
Crawford West Mead Industrial Park
CR-3 Heavy Industrial Park
West Mead Twp.
190 acres
Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
G,W,S,E existing; Entrance road, RR , storm water facilities
Five businesses at park; CCDC sold all but about 25 acres & owns 20,500 sf of a 200,000 sf facility
Crawford Terrence St. Property
CR-4 City of Meadville, French Creek Valley Enterprise Zone
27 Within DSL and Cable Modem Capability
Utilities at edge of property
Extensive site work needed; Land available for development
County Name of Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 211
Crawford Former Talon
Plant #7 CR-5 City of
Meadville, South Main St., French Creek Valley Enterprise Zone
7+ Within DSL and Cable Modem Capability
W,S,E,G existing
KOZ; 1,2,and 3 story metal fabrication industrial complex (60,000+sf); 1 st floor warehousing tenants only
Crawford Keystone Regional Industrial Park
CR-6 Southern tip of Crawford Co.; I-79 passes just 3,000 ft. to the east of the industrial park; 33 miles N of I-90 and 22 miles S to I-80
1,300 No DSL, but Cable Modem Capability
W,S,G,E on-site
Clear land road and RR on site; Park tenants include PPG (float glass manufacturing) and JM Manufacturing (PVC pipe manufacturing)
Crawford Cambridge Business Center
CR-7 Light industrial, Hi-tech operations, service & distribution centers
State Rt. 86, Cambridge Twp.
10 lots ranging from 5-7 acres
Cable TV/fiber optic, telephone/fiber optic, No DSL or Cable Modem
W,S,E,G existing
Service roads existing
Crawford Iroquois Commerce Park
CR-8 Light industrial park
Conneaut Lake (4-lane US Rt. 322)
44 acres broken into 14 lots from 1.38 to 8.23 acres
Fiber optics, phone lines, TV cable on-site, Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
G,W,S,E available
Architectural controls; Privately developed and owned by Associated Contractors
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 212
Erie County
Erie City, at 103,717, remains the County’s and the region’s largest municipality in 2000.
Millcreek Township (52,129) saw the greatest growth between 1990 and 2000, +5309. Harborcreek (16,267) had the second highest growth, +1159.
For the smaller urban areas, Edinboro Borough experienced the largest drop in population (-786) while Girard Borough (+285) and Lake City borough (+292) experienced the highest growth.
In the non-urban townships, Conneaut grew the most (+1,970) between 1990 and 2000; however, 1,885 of the change were due to the development of SCI-Albion. In terms of true residential growth, Girard (+411), Washington (+424) and Waterford Townships (+476) experienced the greatest increases. Greene Township (-191) saw the largest rural population loss.
One of the reasons that Erie County has kept its demographic vitality while neighboring counties are experiencing difficulties is its concentration of colleges and universities. These institutions represent a mini-community within the greater area.45
New housing developments favor communities along Erie’s Lake shore or the I-79 corridor. …Fairview is where most of the upscale units are built, followed by Millcreek. However, McKean and Washington Townships are also seeing increased development.46
Future changes in land use that will have a significant impact on traffic will generally proceed along existing development patterns, with residential development continuing in the municipalities surrounding the City of Erie. Some limited industrial redevelopment and new industrial development will occur in the City of Erie along the Bayfront and in the enterprise zone, in Millcreek Township, Harborcreek Township, Summit Township and the City of Corry. Commercial development is also planned along the Bayfront in the City of Erie and at selected locations throughout the City. In addition, commercial development is expected in Millcreek, Summit, Harborcreek and Fairview Townships.47
These data show a significant number of KOZ sites in Erie County, most located either in the City of Erie or in Corry, which is in the southeast corner of the county. Corry has had an active industrial development market in recent years. Many of the KOZ sites in the City of Erie have some environmental issues, but some of these are already being addressed. Erie County’s Albion site is in private ownership and currently inactive.
Erie County has industrial parks with the KOZ designation and ready-to-build lots. Erie County has several former manufacturing plants converted to multi-tenant facilities with KOZ designations, including the Erie Plastics facility in Corry.
45Erie County Demographic Study, January, 2003; Prepared by Graney, Grossman, Colosimo and Associates, Inc., Grove City, Pennsylvania, With the Assistance of the Erie county Department of Planning
46 Erie County Housing Plan, February 20, 2001; Prepared for the County of Erie, Assisted by Graney, Grossman, Ray and Associates, Harrisville, Pennsylvania
47 Erie County Long Range Transportation Plan, 1998 Update; Prepared by: The Erie County Department of Planning in cooperation with: The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, The Erie Area Transportation Study Technical and Coordinating Committees, The Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority, The Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port Authority, Erie Municipal Airport Authority, Local Municipal Officials
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 213
Some industrial parks have KOZ designation while other KOZ sites are raw land proposed for future development.
Erie County has considerable KOZ land but much of that land is in private ownership and not readily available. Much is also available in the Corry area. All of the KOZ land in the City of Erie (329 + acres) consists of brownfield sites, with 30 acres possibly available for development within 12 months (of March 2002). The major issue is funding for infrastructure which is being addressed. The 40 acres in Fairview Business Park, near the City of Erie, is available immediately. The data suggest that Erie County’s readily available KOZ property is insufficient for potential long-range demand based on past trends.48
The remaining narrative information (not maps and tabular information) is from the City of Erie Telecommunications Planning: Phase 1: Executive Report (See credits in footnote at end of section)
Recomme ndations
Perform more detailed business planning to determine the optimal partnering strategies for a community branded offering and determine the optimum route for the 6-mile fiber optic cable. This route should pass the largest number of potential businesses and multifamily residential units and still connect the necessary City facilities as originally intended.
The City should appropriate the necessary funds and construct the network.
Follow parallel paths of negotiating with current and potential services providers and forming the Not-For-Profit entity as the first step of creating a Public/Private partnership. Maintaining this flexibility will ensure the City has both maximum negotiating leverage with providers and can secure a business arrangement that can provide the greatest financial benefits to the community.
4. Pursue potential State of Pennsylvania grants currently available to fund technology infrastructure improvements that could benefit low-income housing residents and others within the community.
Next Steps (assuming the City affirms the above recommendations)
1. Prepare Detailed business plan
2. Initiate discussions with the 13 potential providers
3. Conduct an engineering study to determine both the optimum technology to deploy and costs for such.
4. File the necessary applications with the State of Pennsylvania Economic Development Department to obtain available technology grants for technology infrastructure construction.
48 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 214
5. Approach surrounding townships and boroughs to get their participation and financia l support if necessary.49
49 City of Erie Telecommunications Planning: Phase 1: Executive Report, April 3, 2002; ION Consulting, Chicago, Illinois
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 215
Table 10-C: Erie County Development Initiatives
County Name of
Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Erie Cohen Site-Various
E-1 Industrial Park East of Downing, N of E 18 th St.
20 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie CSX (Conrail) E-2 Near Ash St., N of 18th St.
60 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie Liberty Iron & Metal
E-3 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
6 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie Redevelopment Auth.
E-4 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
4 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie Steve McGarvey
E-5 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
1 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie Randy Rydzewski
E-6 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
2 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie City of Erie E-7 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
4 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ
Erie Norfolk & Others
E-8 Property is on or near Parade Street from 14 th-20th St.
Erie Sixteenth & Pittsburg LLC (DiCarlo, Griffith ET Ux)
E-10 W 16 th & Pittsburgh Avenue
17 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ; Available
Erie International Paper
E-11 E 12 th at Downing
22.8 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; Available
Erie Empire Auto E-12 E 12 th at Downing
2.4 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; Available
Erie Kaiser Aluminum
E-13 E 12 th Near Pennsylvania Avenue
28.4 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; Available
Erie Koehler Brewery Square, LLC
E-14 W 22nd & State St.
1.6 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; In process of development
Erie Schvaro Reality E-15 E 33 rd & 15 Within DSL & KOEZ;
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 216
McCain Cable Modem Capability
New owner; Available
Erie Fry (Mayer Bros)
E-16 E 33 rd & McCain
15 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; New owner; Available
Erie Various Owners
E-17 E 16 th-E18th Franklin McClelland
Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; Available
Erie Hadspar (Herb Sweny)
E-18 W 13 th & Cranberry
4.5 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOEZ; Available
Erie Gunite/EMI E-19 S side W 12 th St. @ Cherry St.
12 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available; City assisting reuse
Erie GE Refrigeration
E-20 SW Corner E 12th @ Franklin Ave.
11.2 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available
Erie Skinner Engine Co.
E-21 S Side W 12th Near Myrt le St.
3.05 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available
Erie Schnell Property (Lake Erie Bumper)
E-22 N Side W 12th St. @ Cascade St.
1.49 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available;
Erie International Paper
E-23 S Side E Lake Road, W of Downing Ave.
55.73 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available; City assisting reuse
Erie GEIDC Property
E-24 NE Corner E 34th @ Page St.
4.4 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available
Erie GEIDC Property (Adj. for wetlands)
E-25 S Side E 26th St. Near McCain
10 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
KOZ/KOEZ; Available
Erie International Paper
E-26 W Lake Rd @ Hammerville Dr.
115 KOIZ; Available; City assisting in reuse
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 217
Figure 10-A: Erie County 2030 Transportation Plan Highway Network
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 218
Figure 10-B: Erie County 2030 Transportation Plan Erie Urban Area
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 219
Figure 10-C: Erie County-Keystone Zones
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 220
Figure 10-D: Erie County-Wide Enterprise Zone Program
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 221
Figure 10-E: Erie County Plans for Land Use & Community Facilities
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 222
Figure 10-F: Erie County Composite Local Zoning Districts
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 223
Forest County
Forest County had a 200-acre KOZ site in Jenks Township north of Marienville, but that land has been taken off the market because it is currently being developed with a new Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution. Forest County is the only county in the Northwest region that is currently not actively developing and marketing one or more KOZ property.
Forest County has no KOZ land; however, it also had no demand.
Forest County also has the privately-owned Marienville Industrial Park, which is the reuse of the former Anchor Hocking Glass Plant in Marienville as a multi-tenant facility. Approximately 40,000 square feet of space is immediately available. A new electro-coating business and painting business represent recent industrial activity in the complex.50
The remaining narrative information (not tabular) for Forest County is from The Forest County Comprehensive Plan, 1998 (See footnote at end of section)
Growth Priority Areas
A local consensus is in near agreement that the Route 66 corridor, north and particularly south of Marienville and, the Route 36 corridor, south of Tionesta, represents the most suitable parcels for future growth. Fortunately, detailed land use infrastructure, environmental limitations, and even preliminary site planning information are available for these corridors (see the 1987 Forest County Tornado Disaster Economic Recovery Plan and the 1988 Marienville Corridor Economic Recovery Plan). With much of the detailed planning complete, what is now needed is a means of implementation.
What has kept these areas from developing in a manner desired by the community? There seems to be three factors. First, the lack of public water and sewer. Second, the lack of concerted marketing efforts by communities or property owners. Finally, based upon studies of similar situations throughout western and central Pennsylvania, is a lack of development incentives.
Economic Development Plan
Though it may be said that Forrest county got little lasting benefit from the Industrial Revolution, there is hope that the community can come out a winner in the new information-age economy.
The new information-age or post-industrial economy has certain characteristics which would make Forrest County an appropriate home for such economic activities. Locational emphasis in information–age economics is almost wholly based upon quality of life. Since information is a commodity, and it can be transferred inexpensively worldwide, proximity to labor pools and resources is unimportant. In spite of its problems, Forrest County has small pleasant towns, scenic vistas unmatched in the eastern United States, and a way of life which much of the nation envies.
50 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 224
The second notable factor of an information-age economy is its decentralization. Most of the new information-age businesses are relatively small and work in coalition with other businesses.
One final trend also lends itself to hope for Forest County’s economy. That trend is toward community-based economic development. Communities from Nova Scotia to the American Midwest are choosing, in part, to opt out of the global economy, and rebuild the economic infrastructure which will make them viable for the foreseeable future. The survival of the community depends, in large part, on whether we will be able to revitalize and resurrect our community-based economies.
Each of these sectors has various opportunities which can help close gaps and complete the web. They can be summarized in three general areas:
« Agro-Forestry and the Processing of Forest Products
« Tourism and Residential Development: Seeing Quality of Life as a Marketable Commodity
« Retail and the New Service Businesses
New Service Activities :
Many analysts extol the information-age economy, which is essentially service-based. For Forest County to participate in this economy will require attention to proper business infrastructure. This includes high-speed modem lines, fiber optics, and access to various Internet and computer-related services. It is recommended that the County work to aggressively pursue the development of such infrastructure. An excellent resource already exists in the IDC facility.
Correctional facility/Major Facility Impact: Overall, this new facility will be the most significant impact on Jenks Township and Forest County since the oil boom. (i.e. wages, jobs, population increases, increased housing, import of goods and supplies, construction, gasoline and food sales, etc.)
The actual economic impact of the project would probably be spread through large parts of Forest, Venango, Clarion, Warren, and Elk Counties. Though the prison would probably not adversely effect local quality of life, without preparation now, it will not create benefits.
Conclusion
There is a strong interest in economic development to create job opportunities and prevent the out migration of the young.
There is a strong preference for locally based development in the form of “cottage industries,” small business wood products and business opportunities based upon quality of local life. This desire can be tied to previous points as the local desire for a complete, fully functioning local economy and community.51
Tionesta Wireless Project
51 Forest County Comprehensive Plan, 1998; Prepared by the Forest County Conservation District and Planning Commission, Assisted by Graney, Grossman, Ray and Associates, New Wilmington, Pennsylvania, Franklin, Pennsylvania
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 225
In cooperation with the Forest County Commissioners and the Forest County Industrial Development Corporation, the Northwest Commission was able to secure a $44,000 grant from the Appalachian Regional Commission to implement a public-private partnership offering broadband wireless Internet into Tionesta Borough and surrounding municipalities. Until October 2003, an affordable broadband solution was not available in the tiny, rural community. Recently, the telephone company began offering DSL in order to stay competitive with the wireless project. A bid process will take place in November to select a wireless provider who will implement the service and will complete the partnership. Implementation is set to be complete by January 2004.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 226
Table 10-D: Forest County Development Initiatives
County Name of Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Forest Hunter Station F-1 Along Rt. 62 S of Tionesta Station
No DSL or Cable Modem
Forest H&M Mus. Industrial Park
F-2 Along Rt. 62 near Tionesta
No DSL or Cable Modem
Forest SCI Forest F-3 SE of Rt. 66 between Marienville & Pigeon
No DSL or Cable Modem
Forest Res./Comm. Corridor
F-4 Marienville No DSL or Cable Modem
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 227
Lawrence County
Lawrence County has industrial parks with the KOZ designation and ready-to-build lots.
Lawrence County has six KOZ sites.
Lawrence County appears to be in balance in terms of supply and demand, especially with the addition of a new industrial park that has ready-to-build lots and another proposed industrial park.
Lawrence County has eight industrial parks, but only one is new and highly competitive. None of the existing industrial parks are located near I-79. Several are brownfield developments and one is a relatively unusual sub-surface property. 52
52 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 228
Table 10-E: Lawrence County Development Initiatives
County Name of
Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Lawrence Shenango Commerce Park
L-1 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Shenango Twp.
202 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Millenium Park L-2 High Tech manufacturing, R&D flex space
Neshannock Twp.
1,200 No DSL, but Cable Modem Capability
Proposed; Available
Lawrence Bruce Industrial Park
L-3 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
City of New Castle
30 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Gateway Commerce Center
L-4 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Wampum Borough
60 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Eastgate Commerce Center
L-5 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Shenango Twp.
26 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Linton Industrial Center
L-6 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Wilmington Twp.
12 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence New Castle Commerce Center
L-7 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
City of New Castle
19 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence New Castle Development Company
L-8 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
North Beaver Twp.
500 No DSL, but Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Northgate Industrial Park
L-9 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Neshannock Twp.
26 No DSL, but Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Phil Art Industrial Park
L-10 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Neshannock Twp.
42 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence RIDC Neshannock
L-11 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Neshannock Twp.
72 No DSL, but Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Riverview Commerce Park
L-12 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
City of New Castle
75 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 229
Lawrence Robert P, Casey
Industrial Park L-13 Industrial, light
industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
Ellwood City Borough
50+ Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Filled
Lawrence Three Rivers Industrial Park
L-14 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
City of New Castle
67 Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Available
Lawrence Wampum Industrial Park
L-15 Industrial, light industrial manufacturing, business warehousing
New Beaver Borough
40+ Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Filled
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 230
Mercer County
Mercer County has multiple KOZ sites in the Shenango Valley industrial corridor on the west side of the County, as well as an industrial park in Greenville. Some of the KOZ sites in this area have environmental issues and may not be developed in the near term.
The Shenango Valley area includes the cities of Hermitage, Farrell, and Sharon. The Shenango Valley KOZ sites are typically brownfield sites that were part of closed steel mills, but there is also a Greenfield site and a residential site in that area.
Mercer County appears to be in balance in terms of land supply and demand. This is because 500 acres of brownfield KOZ property is unlikely to be developed for years, if ever. Mercer County has competed for large users recently and the KOZ property in the County does not provide adequate sites for this type of development with the exception of Greenville -Reynolds East.
Mercer County has numerous advantages for industrial development. There are two interstate highways (I-79 & I-80) that transverse the County, one in an east-west and one in a north-south direction. The County is in the path of the New York to Indiana market. The County has considerable heavy industrial land that is in great demand for a wide range of manufacturing companies, particularly steel manufacturing and processing companies. The area has an excellent labor force and is a pro-active political community, with highly trained economic development professionals throughout the County. Thus, in terms of demand, there is no reason that the potential demand for new industrial land over the 2000 to 2009 decade should not equal or exceed 400 acres, assuming that the national economy continues to be strong and continue to create the market for manufacturing products.
If that is the case, then the County is in a negative supply-demand condition in terms of available industrial land.53
The remaining narrative information (and map, but not tabular information) for Mercer County is from Mercer County-Future “Planning for Livable Communities” Land Use Plan and Trends & Data (See credits in footnote at end of section)
2. People and development have simply chosen to relocate themselves, typically from the older, urban areas to the newer suburban and rural areas.
3. Commercial - The growth in commercial land use is more due to movement of business from urban centers to new outlying commercial areas.
Whereas there was a past 20-year growth of 500 acres (250 acres each 10 years) under a scenario of sprawl development, it is projected that 250 acres will be needed for new commercial growth under a scenario of non-sprawl development.
53 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 231
4. Industrial
Given the desire to improve economic development and job creation results, it is estimated that more than double the recent land absorption will be needed to meet desired goals. Higher projections are proposed in consultation with Penn-Northwest Development Corporation for two reasons: 1) new industries in the I-80/I-79 corridors are likely to be warehouse and distribution which has greater land needs per employee, and 2) the interstate corridor locations will draw from a labor market involving several counties beyond Mercer County.
It is projected that 1,000 acres will be needed for new industrial growth in the next ten years.
5. Revitalization target areas
Southwest Region
The old business and industry heart of the Shenango Valley, also now the major part of the Shenango Valley Enterprise Zone – Larger economic development opportunities include reuse of idle portions of Caparo Steel in Farrell (in planning stages with Shenango Valley Industrial Development Corporation), reuse of the vacant Westinghouse plant in Sharon (pending Superfund environmental clean-up) and continued revitalization of downtown Sharon.
Urban residential neighborhoods adjacent to the business and industrial center – These neighborhoods include older, more dense housing and are characterized by low incomes, high minority population and high percentages of non-owner occupants.
Older business and residential areas at and around downtown West Middlesex.
Northwest Region
Older, urban centers in Greenville and Jamestown – The downtowns and older adjacent neighborhoods should be targets for revitalization efforts. Downtown Greenville should continue to be a focal point for regional attention. Downtown Jamestown, on the gateway to the popular Pymatuning recreation area, could be an interesting target for creative tourism and travel business opportunities.
Northeast Region
Town centers – The older town centers of Stoneboro, Sandy Lake, New Lebanon and Sheakleyville, both business and residential areas, should receive continued attention for revitalization and reinvestment.
Southeast Region
Downtown Grove City – The downtown area should be a regional priority for revitalization efforts to ensure its long-term viability.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 232
Central Region
Downtown Mercer – The downtown area should be a regional priority for revitalization efforts to ensure its long-term viability.
Town centers – The older town centers of Fredonia and Jackson Center, both business and residential areas, should receive continued attention for revitalization and reinvestment.
6. Growth target areas
Southwest Region
PA 18 from Morefield Road area to Lamor Road area in Hermitage – This corridor is favored for business growth and has substantial vacant parcels for development opportunities.
Broadway Road corridor and nearby areas in Hermitage and Wheatland – This area is currently targeted for industrial development and has some remaining parcels for further development.
East suburbs (Hermitage) and north suburbs (Hermitage & South Pymatuning) – These areas are within service reach of existing sanitary sewers and are logical growth choices for residential development.
West Middlesex outgrowth in Shenango Township – This area has sanitary sewer service which area proponents believe is under-exploited due to lack of development. It is a good opportunity for residential extension of the West Middlesex community. The PA 18 corridor should receive more attention for business/industrial development opportunities.
An area south of PA 318 between PA 60 and I-80 extending to Mitchell/Fennell/ Minner Roads presents an opportunity for economic development. It should be carefully planned to minimize impacts on existing residential development and sprawl into nearby rural areas. Completion of the half-diamond interchange at PA 60/ PA 318 is important for access.
Shenango Lake growth area – Recreation/tourism growth should be pursued here. Both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Shenango Reservoir) and Shenango Valley Chamber of Commerce have discussed development opportunities despite the restrictions of federal ownership of the lake and surrounding lands.
Northwest Region
Extended communities around Greenville and Jamestown – These areas are good choices for extended residential growth and carefully planned business growth, coordinated so it does not adversely affect downtown revitalization efforts.
Reynolds industrial park growth areas – Two growth areas are being developed by Greenville -Reynolds Industrial Development
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 233
Corporation. Reynolds East on the Kidd’s Mill Road has the most long-term industrial growth possibilities in the region.
Northeast Region
Extended communities around Stoneboro and Sandy Lake – These areas are good choices for extended residential growth and carefully planned business growth, coordinated so it does not adversely affect downtown revitalization efforts.
I-79/PA 358 interchange – This area is targeted for business and industrial development (a small amount exists already). It is more of a long-term consideration, however, because of the lack of public sewer and water service and the large cost of extending such service from the Sandy Lake/Stoneboro area or building new facilities at the interchange.
Southeast Region
Extended community around Grove City – This area is a good choice for extended residential growth and carefully planned business growth, coordinated so it does not adversely affect downtown revitalization efforts.
I-79/PA 208 interchange – This area underwent dramatic change beginning two years ago with development of a major retail outlet center and coattail businesses. Public sewer and water now serves much of the interchange and more growth is likely.
The area is a good target for further business and industrial growth, but growth should be contained within a limited, controlled area. There is potential here for unplanned growth to burst and sprawl along the PA 208 corridor creating a snarl of traffic signals, entering/exiting automobiles, and acres of pavement and agglomerations of signs which do not match the vision of an otherwise rural community. Initially, the development area should extend no further than from PA 258 on the east to the vicinity of Grove City Airport on the west.
Leesburg village – It is ideal for additional development of village uses already here (homes, shops, historic sites, etc.) and enhancement of the rural, small-town pathway of tourism developed at a scale similar and sensitive to the existing village (human-scale buildings, short road setback, reuse of homes, school). It is not ideal for sprawling suburban commercial development set back behind expansive parking lots underneath bright all-night lighting.
Central Region
Extended community around Mercer and Fredonia – These areas are good choices for extended residential growth and carefully planned business growth, coordinated so it does not adversely affect downtown revitalization efforts.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 234
I-79/US 62 interchange plus Jackson Center and Lake Latonka – This area attracted much interest at the regional meetings. There was even talk of a new, greater community by the linking of three areas:
Jackson Center has room to extend its existing community with more residential development.
Lake Latonka has room for significantly more infill residential development although the current lack of public sanitary sewer service is a serious constraint which must be overcome.
The I-79/US 62 interchange has land and potential for both industrial and business development oriented to serve a growing regional community. An industrial development project, Jackson Commerce Park being developed by Lakeview Industrial Development Corporation, is already underway on 100 acres in the SE interchange quadrant. Business development on available road frontage, carefully planned and contained without sprawl, would be an ideal complement to the region.
I-80/US 19 interchange – This interchange would be a very marketable location for economic development if public sewer and water service were provided. It should include primarily industrial development and effort should be made to secure as large as possible tracts of land for larger-scale development opportunities. Commercial development should be secondary and minimal so as not to sprawl the impact of development along US 19.
Charleston village – This village was suggested for extended residential growth with village-scale business possibilities.54
54 Mercer County-Future Land Use “Planning for Livable Communities” Land Use Plan-Trends & Data; Assisted by Graney, Grossman, Ray and Associates, New Wilmington, Pennsylvania, Franklin, Pennsylvania
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
Sharon Hermitage Farrell Sharpsville Wheatland W. Middlesex
Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Potential new development at far reaches of W,S
Socio-economic center; KOZ site S of Farrell-new city neighborhood, 145 housing units; 50,000+ persons; Greatest development potential at SE & NE hermitage (PA 18 Corridor)
Mercer Grove City (southeast)
M-2 Residential, industrial (Existing)
Grove City Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Potential new development at far reaches of W,S
Socio-economic center; 17,000+ persons; Potential at S Grove City (Pine Twp. Into Liberty Twp.) Prime outlets at I-79/PA 208; 60 acres commercial
Mercer Greenville (northwest)
M-3 Residential, industrial (Existing)
Greenville Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Potential new development at far reaches of W,S
Socio-economic center; 15,000+ persons; Potential at E of Greenville (Hempfield Twp.)
Mercer Mercer (central)
M-4 Residential, industrial (Existing)
Mercer Borough
Within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Socio-economic center; 8,000+ persons
Mercer Lakeview (northeast)
M-5 Residential, industrial (Existing)
Stoneboro Sandy Lake
Stoneboro & 1/3 of Sandy Lake within DSL & Cable Modem Capability
Socio-economic center; 5,000+ persons
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 236
Mercer Old Sharon
steel Site
M-6 Industrial (Existing and revitalized)
Farrell and Sharon south
100 acres being used (hot/ cold mills) 35 acres being re-devel-oped; Legacy Com-mons 150-200 acres unused w/ poten-tial rede-velop-ment
W,S available
Most area KOZ
Mercer Westinghouse Site
M-7 Industrial (Existing and revitalized)
Sharon north flats
32 W,S available
Most area KOZ; Sharon Tube and Sawmill (pipe/tube manufacturers)
Mercer Wheatland Industrial Development
M-8 Industrial (Existing and revitalized)
W,S available
Most area KOZ; Legacy Commons redevelopment anchored by Sharon Tube (cold mill)
Mercer Hermitage Industrial Development
M-9 Industrial (Existing and revitalized)
Hermitage Several 25-40 acres available for devel-opment
W,S available
KOZ pending for two 25 acres pieces; Several manufacturing and trucking companies
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 237
Figure 10-G: Mercer County Future Land Use
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 238
Venango County Venango County has industrial parks with the KOZ designation and ready-to-build lots.
Venango County has two attractive KOZ sites.
Venango County is in a similar position as Crawford with the very attractive Barkeyville KOZ site.
The County’s existing industrial parks are relatively small, ranging from 28 to 54 acres in size. These are located in the traditional development sectors of the County, in and near Franklin, and in and near Oil City.
While Venango County attracted 16 new companies that moved into the County during the 1990’s, all of the industrial land sales/development were the result of expansion of local companies. New companies primarily moved into existing industrial space rather than developed new plants.16
16 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 239
Table 10-G: Venango County Development Initiatives
Majority of population lives & works within this area
Venango Northern growth area
V-2 (Center in City of Titusville in Crawford County), but has two radii into Venango Co.- Rt. 8 from Crosscreek resort into Titusville and Rt. 27 from Pleasantville into Titusville
No Cable Modem, DSL capable only around the center of Oil City & Franklin
Venango Polk Boro and Polk Center
V-3 Polk Boro No DSL or Cable Modem
Future growth and development
Venango Routes 8 and 38 V-4 Intersection of Rts. 8 and 38
No DSL or Cable Modem
Potential growth and development area
Venango Scrubgrass Power Plant
V-5 No DSL or Cable Modem
KOZ; Potential development area
Venango Barkeyville Industrial Park
V-6 Barkeyville Borough Exit 29 of I-80
120+ No DSL or Cable Modem
KOZ; Shovel Ready
Venango Routes 308 and I-80
V-7 Intersection of Rts. 308 and I-80 Exit 35
No DSL or Cable Modem
Potential growth area
Venango Emlenton KOZ V-8 Exit 42 of I-80 at Emlenton (Includes parts of Venango & Butler Co.)
No DSL or Cable Modem
KOZ
Venango Exit 45 of I-80 V-9 Exit 45 of I-80 No DSL or Cable Modem
Potential for future growth and development
Venango Rt. 8 and 227 Corridor
V- COR-10
No DSL or Cable Modem
Venango I-80 Corridor V- COR-11
No DSL or Cable Modem
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 240
Warren County
Warren County has five KOZ properties.
Warren County has an excess supply of KOZ land based on past demand trends, although much of it is undeveloped. It is well-positioned to compete for a large land user due to the size of its sites.
At present, Warren county has one small publicly-owned industrial park, a large privately owned park and privately funded redevelopment of a vacated industrial property, a sizable incubator building, and five KOZ properties.
While the magnitude of industrial development activity in Warren County is small compared with most other counties Northwest Pennsylvania, current County activity represents sound progress for providing a more diverse industrial market, as “greenfield” land is being made available, in addition to the availability of land and buildings at redeveloped brownfield properties. Also, unlike most counties in Northwest Pennsylvania, where numerous submarkets exist, much of Warren County’s industrial development is located in one area/ i.e., within the vicinity of the City of Warren.56
The remaining narrative information (not tabular) is from the Warren County Comprehensive Plan, Draft Partial, April 2003 (See credits in footnote at end of section)
There was a consensus (from Citizen Visioning Meetings) that good industrial sites were needed with formal industrial parks and perhaps multi-tenant buildings.
Better access to I-86 (the Southern Tier Expressway), the construction of additional four-lane roads in the County, and improved access to major destinations (Erie, I-80, and I-79) were some specific concerns which did surface (during Citizen Visioning Meetings).
Industrial Focus Group
Transportation is OK – could improve access to Interstates, especially I-86.
Rail important, but used primarily for bulk freight-not time -sensitive.
Trained and motivated labor force is a big need.
Retention of professional staff a problem (hospital) – housing an issue
Out-of-County environmentalists hurting wood industry-competition from Mexico/South America woods and plastics is increasing
Job training/technical training a continuing need.
Need for immediate access to vacant industrial land and buildings. Tom Ehrensberger of the Governor’s Action Team stated that most companies scouting for space are interested in immediate access. “Spec” buildings, multi-tenant structures, and incubators are typical facilities.
56 Industrial Land Absorption Study Keystone Opportunity Zones Northwest Pennsylvania, March 2002; Prepared For: Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission by S. Patz and Associates, Inc. Herndon, Virginia
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 241
Wood Products Focus Group
They recommended that a “niche” wood products industrial park be considered
Statement of Objectives
Overall Plan Priorities: Warren County’s most important asset is its youth – The children of today are the community builders of tomorrow. Over the past two decades, more and more of these young people have been leaving Warren County to seek work, education, and start families elsewhere. The primary purpose of this plan is to create economic opportunities in Warren County to keep our future leaders here, and attract new residents while maintaining a superior quality of life.
The Economy:
Industrial -Manufacturing-“High-Tech” Initiatives. Based upon State and County data, jobs in these sectors still, on average, pay better than any other economic sector. As a consequence, programs, policies, and initiatives to create jobs in these sectors will receive top priority. Generally, activities will focus in the following areas:
« Physical Assets – Create the needed physical resources, i.e. industrial land, the reuse of brownfield sites, and new structures to accommodate the expansion of existing businesses and attract new businesses to the County.
« Education – Support and create the infrastructure needed to both create and maintain a world-class workforce.
« Incentives
« Wise use of natural resources
« Improve retail options
« Promote tourist activities
Transportation
« Continue improvements to the condition and capacity of route 6.
« Create better access to I-86, the Southern Tier Expressway.
« Re-examine the County airport policy.
Community Facilities and Utilities
« Provide for cutting-edge technical training on a secondary and post-secondary basis.57
57 Warren County Comprehensive Plan, (Partial Draft Copy), April 2003; Prepared by Graney, Grossman, Colosimo, and Associates, the Warren County
Planning Commission and the Warren Intergovernmental Cooperative.
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 242
Table 10-H: Warren County Development Initiatives
County Name of Development or Assigned Name
Dev. Proj. ID
Type Development
General Location
Acres Status of Communication Infrastructure
Status of Other Utility Infrastructure:
Special Designation or Comments
Warren Near Warren Mall & Fram Colony Industrial Park
W-1 Industrial and commercial growth (Existing and Planned)
Intersection Rt. 62 & 69 (Jackson Run Rd.) north to Russell Village
100+ State surplus in process of acquiring
Cable Modem Capability
W,S available
KOZ
Warren Starbrick W-2 Mostly industrial, some commercial (Existing)
West end of Warren westerly to Scott Run Rd.
Cable Modem and part DSL Capability
W,S,R existing
Three Proposed KOZs, Former Deluxe (Spedd prop.), Southwell prop., Warren Railcar; Existing electric generating plant & several commercial properties
Warren National Forge Industrial Park
W-3 Industrial (Planned)
Along Old Rt. 6, adjacent to Ellwood City
60 Cable Modem Capability
S,R available, W very near future
Proposed KOZ; Large manufacturing firm; Chamber negotiating to purchase
Warren Brokenstraw Rt. 6 Corridor
W-4 Industrial and commercial (Existing)
Western edge of Youngsville to intersection of Rt. 6 and 27
Cable Modem Capability
S,E available
Designated Industrial/Commercial Growth area; Several existing industrial & commercial properties
Warren Mead Twp. Rt. 6 Corridor
W-5 Primarily commercial, some industrial (Existing)
Along Rt. 6 between Warren & Clarendon
Cable Modem Capability
S available, Limited R & W
Warren Columbus Twp. Rt. 6 Corridor
W-6 S of Rt. 6 Industrial; N of Rt. 6 Commercial (Existing)
Along Rt. 6 in Columbus Twp. From Columbus Village west
300+ acres of KOZ
DSL Capability centered in Corry City
R along S side of Rt. 6; W,S available part of NW-Rt. 6
KOZ
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning & Development Commission CONNECT NW PA Broadband Study and Action Plan Supplemental Report
December 23, 2003 Page 243
End-User Survey Response Data
Table 10-I: End-User Survey By: All 8 Counties – All Entities
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission “CONNECT NW PA”- Broadband Study
End-User Survey Results By: All 8 Counties-All Entities
Q#4: If you provide Internet Service and/or bandwidth, will you provide existing facility, infrastructure data & maps, as well as rate schedule data & service area maps to the Commission for use in the study?
Yes 6 33.3%No 1 5.6%Will provide some requested data 11 61.1%
18 100.0%
Not Answered 1
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 300
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#5: If you provide Internet Service and/or bandwidth, will you provide future facility, infrastructure data & maps, as well as rate schedule data & service area maps to the Commission for use in the study?
Yes 5 27.8%No 1 5.6%Will provide some data 12 66.7%
18 100.0%
Not Answered 1
Q#6: Please indicate in which counties your firm has a Point of Presence (POP) or Network Operating Center (NOC)?
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 302
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#8: What is the monthly cost of basic Internet service for a residential user? (If other than dial-up service, please identify)
Less than $15 5 27.8%$16-$25 5 27.8% (1@ FWA, 1@Cable Modem
up to 3 Mbps, 1@$34.95 DSL)$26-$45 7 38.9%$45+/Other 1 5.6% Wireless 256K-900K
18 100.0%
Not Answered 4
Note:(One company provided 4 answers)
Q#9: What is the monthly average cost of a T1 Line for a commercial user? (use average transport cost for businesses using a T1 Line in the areas you serve in the 8 county region)
Less than $500 3 21.4%$501-$900 5 35.7%$901-$1,300 6 42.9%$1,300 +/Other 0 0.0%
14 100.0%
Not Answered 5
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 303
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#10: Are there multiple Internet/bandwidth providers also serving in your service area for customers to choose from?
Yes 16 94.1%No 1 5.9%Uncertain 0 0.0%
17 100.0%
Not Answered 2
Q#11: What percent of your service area do you currently offer 2 Mbps or more in at least one direction?
Less than 34% 4 22.2%34-66% 3 16.7%67-100% 6 33.3%Do not offer 2 Mbps or more 5 27.8%
18 100.0%
Not Answered 1Q#12: To what degree are features of your connectivity service (access time, transfer speed, etc.) affected by the number of users connected?
None or Little Affect 13 72.2%Moderate Affect 4 22.2%Large Affect 1 5.6%Other 0 0.0%
18 100.0%
Not Answered 1
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 304
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#13: What maximum bandwidth availability does your firm currently offer ?
Q#14: What speed does your firm use to describe "broadband" in at least one direction?
Less than 200 Kbps 1 5.9%200 Kbps 0 0.0%200K+ to 500 Kbps 7 41.2%500+K to 1.544 Mbps 3 17.6%1.544 Mbps 3 17.6%1.544 M+ to 2 Mbps 1 5.9%More than 2 Mbps 2 11.8%Other 0 0.0%
17 100.0%
Not Answered 2
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 305
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#15: What is the highest priority to your business customers?
Security 1 4.3%Bandwidth Scalability 2 8.7%Availability of Service 5 21.7%Cost 4 17.4%Bundled Service 0 0.0%Quality of Service /Customer Support 9 39.1%Provider Reputation 1 4.3%Other 1 4.3%
23 100.0%
Not Answered 1
Note: (One company provided 6 answeres)
Q#16: Does your firm plan on providing Internet and/or bandwidth services in the future ?
Yes 14 93.3%No 0 0.0%Uncertain 1 6.7%
15 100.0%
Not Answered 4
CONNECT NW PA BROADBAND STUDY REPORT Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
December 23, 2003 Page 306
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission
“CONNECT NW PA” – Broadband Study Service Provider Survey Responses By: All Responding Providers
Q#17: Would your firm be interested in exploring public-private partnerships for service area expansion planning with the Northwest Commission ?
Yes 15 93.8%No 1 6.3%
16 100.0%
Not Answered 3
Q#18: Should local government or cooperatives be part of providing services where private companies are not serving?
Yes 5 27.8%No 9 50.0%Local Gov't Only 0 0.0%Co-ops Only 4 22.2%