Top Banner

of 11

Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

Apr 08, 2018

Download

Documents

rajkumarbaimad
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    1/11

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    2/11

    2

    IntheTimeunitanddisplayformatforthetimevariable sectionselecttheformatofthedata,whichinourcasewouldbeYearly.ThenclickeitherSubmitorOKbuttontocompletethecommand.

    Thiswholeprocesscanalsobeperformedusingthecommandinterface.Writetssetyear,yearlyinthe

    commandwindowforthepresentcase.Ifforexample,indatathetimevariableisdefinedastimeand

    the format is monthly, then all one need to write in the command window is tsset time, monthly

    Similarlyhaditbeaquarterlydatarequiredtowritetssettime,quarterly.Thefollowingoutputwillbe

    displayed:

    .tssetyear,yearly

    timevariable:year,1981to2004

    delta:1year

    Timeseriesplotofvariables

    Thefirstthingoneshoulddointimeseriesanalysisisgetaviewofthetimeseriesplotofallthevariables

    intheanalysis.ToseeaplotofavariablegotoGraphics>>Time-seriesgraphs>>Lineplots.Forthetime

    beingconcentrateonlyonthePlotstabonthepopped-upcommandwindow.ClickontheCreatebutton

    toseeanotherpopped-upcommandwindow.IntheMaintabselecttheTime-seriesplotintheChoosea

    plotcategoryandtypesectionandintheSelecttypedrop-downmenuselectLine.IntheYvariabledrop-

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    3/11

    3

    downmenuselectthevariabletoplotagainsttime.Forexampleselecttheconvariableinourdata

    andthenselectthe Submitbutton.Itmaytakefewsecondstoviewtheplotofthevariable.Theplotof

    theconvariableinourcaselookslikethefollowing:

    Figure:Lineplot

    Thisgraph can alsobegenerated usingthe command interface bywriting twoway(tsline con)inthe

    command window. One can either select Scatter in the Select type drop-down menu or use the

    command interface and write twoway (tsline con, recast(scatter)). The command for line connected

    scatterplotistwoway(tslinecon,recast(connected)).

    Figure:Scatterplot Figure:Lineconnectedscatterplot

    Similargraphsofothervariablescanalsobegeneratedusingthesamecommand.Forexample,forthe

    variablergdppcusethecommandof twoway(tsline rgdppc)forlineplotor twoway(tsline rgdppc,

    recast(connected))forlineconnectedscatterplot.SavethegraphsusingtheSavegraphbuttononthegraphwindowinthedesiredfolder.

    Unit-roottestingforsinglevariable

    Mostofthetimeseriesvariablesarenon-stationary.Tocheckfortheunit-rootinthevariablesthereare

    manyalternatives.However,themostrecommendedmethodsaretheAugmentedDickey-Fuller(ADF

    testandthePhillips-Perron(P-P)test.ToperformtheADFtestgotoStatistics>>Timeseries>>Tests>>

    AugmentedDickey-Fullerunit-roottest.IntheMaintabofthepopped-upwindowselectthevariableto

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    4/11

    4

    testfromthedrop-downmenuof Variable.InthesectionofOptionscheckthedesiredboxestohavein

    the test.For example, ina single variableunit-root testing the box ofSuppress constant term in the

    regressionshouldnotbechecked.Ontheotherhand,theinclusionoftrendand/ordriftterminthe

    regressiondependsonthenatureoftheplotofthevariable.Selectthenumberoflagstoincludethe

    testfromtheLaggeddifferencestab.Therearenocertainrulestoselectthenumberoflags.OnecanuseAkaike'sinformationcriterion(AIC)orSchwarzBayesianinformationcriteriontodeterminethenumber

    oflags.ThereisaruleofthumbthatmanyEconometriciansuseindetermininglags,whichstatesthatif

    thedataisyearlythenuseonlyonelag;ifthedataisquarterly,thenuseatleast4lags,andsimilarlyi

    thedataismonthly,useupto12lags.Inthisguidetestforunit-rootinthevariableofcon,onelaghas

    beenused.Theoutputintheresultwindowlookslikethefollowing:

    Wecanaccomplishthesametaskusingthecommandwindow byusing the commandofdfuller con

    regresslags(1),whichismucheasiertouse.

    TodothePhillips-Perron(P-P)testgotoStatistics>>Timeseries>>Tests>>Phillips-Perronunitroots

    test.IntheMaintabselectconintheVariable:drop-downmenuandselectthe defaultlagsoption

    andthenpressthesubmitbutton.Insteadofthisusethecommandofpperroncontodothesamething

    Theresultwouldlooklikethefollowing:

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    5/11

    5

    Usingthestepsdescribedonecandotheunit-roottestforallthevariablesinthemodelofanalysis.One

    pointshouldbenotedisthattheplotofavariablegivesacluewhethertoincludeatrendintotheunit-

    roottest.Forexample,theplotofrealGDPpercapitaisgivenbelow.

    Theplotclearlyshowsthatthevariablehasabuilt-intrend.So,oneshouldincludethetrendintothe

    test.Inourdataforthevariablergdppc,theoptimaltestresultcomesupwithatrendandwith4lags

    intotheADFtest.Thecommandforthetestisdfullerrgdppc,trendregresslags(4).FortheP-Ptestthe

    commandispperronrgdppc,trend.

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    6/11

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    7/11

    7

    TheresultsshowthatthefirstdifferenceofconisstationaryastheADFteststatistic(-3.093)isgreate

    thanthe5%criticalvalue(-3.000)inabsolutetermsand/ortheMackinnonp-valueoftheP-Pstatisticis

    approximatelyzero.Similarly,usethesamemethodtoshowthatalltheothervariablesarestationaryin

    thefirstdifferencedform.So,thevariablesareintegratedoforderone {I(1)}.Remembertoincludea

    trendtermintotheunit-roottestofthedrgdppcvariable.

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    8/11

    8

    Testingforcointegrationin{I(1)}variables:ErrorCorrectionModel(ECM)

    Using the data one can estimate a linear demand function of cigarettes. In estimating the demand

    functionwithtimeseriesdata,theestimationmethodologyisverycrucial(seeforinstanceHarris,1995)

    Themajorconcernwiththetimeseriesisthatifnon-stationarityofdataseriespersiststhenitmayleadtospuriousrelationship.Toavoidthisproblem,itisnecessarytousethecointegrationmethodology.The

    regressionequationcanbeestimatedfortheperiodof1981to2004usingtheEngel-Granger(E-G)two-

    step procedure (Engel and Granger, 1987). The first step is to estimate a long-run equation using

    ordinaryleastsquares(OLS)withvariables,whichareintegratedoforderone, I(1),intheirlevels.In

    ordertoavoidspuriousregression,residualbasedcointegrationtestcanbeused,wherethestationarity

    oftheresidualimpliesaconintegratingrelationshipamongthevariablesinthelongrunequation.The

    secondstepoftheE-Gprocedureistoestimatethecorrespondingerror-correctionmodel(ECM),based

    onthelongruncointegratingrelationshiptoobservetheshortrundynamics(EngelandGranger,1987).

    OnecanestimateanECMusingtheresidualfromthelong-runequation.TheECMisbasedonstationary

    data(asalltheI(1)regressorsareinfirstdifferenceform)andincludesthelaggedresidualsofthelongrunequation,whichisalsoI(0)whenthevariableshavecointegratingrelationship.Onethingyoushould

    know is that the dummy variables are not continuous. As a result, you need not worry about the

    stationarityofthedummyvariables.Thetwodummyvariablesfortheyearof1993and1995arehereto

    controlfortheunusualtroughandspikesrespectivelyintheconsumptiondata.

    ThefirststepoftheE-GistorunanOLSregressiononthevariablesintheirlevels.Thecommandforthe

    regressionisregconrelprcrgdppcdum93dum95.

    Togettheresidualfromthisregressionwecanusethecommandof predictresid,r,whereresidisthe

    variablenameofthepredictedresidual.Theunit-rootoftheresidualcanbetestedbyADFand/orP-P

    test.However,onemustrememberthatinthiscaseyouhavetocheckforthenoconstantterminthe

    regressionoptionandthecriticalvaluesshouldbecalculatedusingtheMacKinnonsresponsesurface

    analysistable(Mackinnon,1991).ThecommandfortheADFtestforresidualis dfullerresid,noconstant

    regresslags(3)andfortheP-Ptestispperronresid,noconstantregress.

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    9/11

    9

    The MacKinnon critical values for the cointegrating equation of 3 variables without trend using 24

    observations at1%,5%and 10% levelofsignificance are -4.954, -4.114, and -3.717 respectively. The

    Dickey-Fuller critical values for this regression at 1%, 5%, and 10% level are -2.66, -1.95, and -1.60

    respectively.So,onecanclearlyseethattheMacKinnoncriticalvaluesaremuchhigherthantheDickey-

    Fullercriticalvalues.AsaresultusingtheD-Fcriticalvaluescanleadtoerrorinstatisticalanalysis.

    OnecanseethattheADFteststatistic(-2.947)islowerthantheMacKinnoncriticalvalueevenat10%level.So,usingADFtestonecannotsaythattheresidualfromtheregressionisstationary.However,the

    P-Pteststatistic(-4.406)ishigherthantheMacKinnoncriticalvalueat5%level.So,itshowsthatthe

    residual is stationary.Considering the fact that asDittmann(2002) argued,Phillips-Perrontest when

    appliedtoresidualbasedconintegrationdeterminationaremorepowerfulthantheADFtest,onecan

    arguethatthereexistsacointegratingrelationshipinthelong-rundemandequationofcigarettes.

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    10/11

    10

    Onecanrunashortrunerrorcorrectionmodel(ECM).IntheECM,theoneperiodlaggedresidualfor

    annualdataactsastheerrorcorrectionterm.Toget theoneperiod lagged residualonecanuse the

    commandasgenlagresid=resid[_n-1].

    ThecommandfortheECMinthiscaseisregdcondrelprcdrgdppcddum93ddum95lagresid.

  • 8/7/2019 Brief Introduction to Stata 10 Time Analysis

    11/11

    11

    References:

    IngolfDittmann(2002):Residual-BasedTestsforFractionalCointegration:AMonteCarloStudy,Journal

    ofTimeSeriesAnalysis,Volume21Issue6,Pages615647.

    JamesMacKinnon(1991):CriticalValuesforCointegrstionTests,inR.EngelandC.Granger,Long-run

    EconomicRelationships,OxfordUniversityPress.Richard I. D. Harris (1995): Using Cointegration analysis in Econometric Modelling, FT Prentice Hal

    Publication.

    RobertAngelandCliveGranger(1987):Cointegrationanderrorcorrection:Representation,estimatio

    andtesting,Econometrica,55:251-276.

    Appendix:Thedatasetusedforthistutorial:

    year con relprc rgdppc dum93 dum95 trend

    1981 754.15 12.54 10273.60 0 0 1

    1982 788.90 13.59 10322.57 0 0 2

    1983 701.55 13.24 10518.93 0 0 3

    1984 735.55 14.83 10832.18 0 0 4

    1985 719.65 15.30 10951.98 0 0 5

    1986 718.25 15.91 11199.04 0 0 6

    1987 738.10 16.47 11376.67 0 0 7

    1988 701.55 17.27 11408.75 0 0 8

    1989 704.40 16.20 11473.76 0 0 9

    1990 614.45 19.83 11797.61 0 0 10

    1991 680.20 17.89 11938.95 0 0 11

    1992 625.80 16.76 12286.00 0 0 12

    1993 575.80 17.34 12724.48 1 0 13

    1994 632.75 17.20 12994.34 0 0 14

    1995 868.95 16.10 13381.83 0 1 15

    1996 811.10 15.36 13768.54 0 0 16

    1997 930.05 14.69 14297.28 0 0 17

    1998 994.45 15.49 14815.08 0 0 18

    1999 977.90 16.66 15315.05 0 0 19

    2000 986.60 15.74 15997.47 0 0 20

    2001 1006.00 15.59 16607.80 0 0 21

    2002 1019.20 15.08 17117.09 0 0 22

    2003 1124.95 14.70 17773.69 0 0 23

    2004 1151.25 14.06 18504.51 0 0 24

    Note:

    Thetheoreticalpremiseandmethodologyusedinthistutorialisforillustrativepurposesonly.

    AdditionalResources

    QuestionspertainingtoStata-10forTimeSeriesAnalysiscanbesubmittedtoNYUsDataServiceStudio

    [email protected].