BRIDGES - Publishable summary The Security dimension of Copernicus encompasses three main areas: Border Surveillance, Maritime Surveillance and Support to EU External Action (SEA). The Copernicus Security services are envisaged to be deployed in 2015; therefore their governance structures and the operational services need to be in place. The overall objective of the BRIDGES project, coordinated by the EU Satellite Centre (EU SatCen), was the development of several potential models of governance for future Copernicus Security services in particular in support to EU External Action. In order to support the EC in the smooth implementation of the service while ensuring the continuity and scaling-up of service provision, the BRIDGES consortium has studied the legal and political framework, evaluated different governance options and defined a roadmap for the future development of the services beyond the BRIDGES project. During the project lifetime, particular attention was given to follow the political framework evolution in accordance with the progressive adoption of the Copernicus Regulation. The involvement of the stakeholders during the entire project duration was also of strategic importance and has been very successful since the beginning of the project. Many stakeholders, such as European External Action Service (EEAS) including Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD), MD Crisis Response and Operational Coordination (MD CROC) and EU Intelligence Analysis Centre (INTCEN); European Commission (including DG ENTR, DG ECHO, Joint Research Centre, etc.), ESA, EDA and Member States, participated actively in the project. One of the main concerns expressed during the BRIDGES stakeholder consultation was the issue of the protection of the Security interests of the Union and its Member States. SEA services address sensitive topics usually related to the foreign policies of Member States. Governance options studied within the project were put in practice in the framework of the G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT FP7 projects, the two projects implementing the pre- operational services for Support to EU External Action. These projects clearly indicate that the users require a fully operational service accompanied by appropriate governance as soon as possible, as the current pre-operational services do not have the capacity to fully meet their needs. The main conclusion and policy recommendation is that the most promising and cost- effective governance model is based on a decentralized approach in which the SatCen has the role of operator of Copernicus services in support to EU External Action.
9
Embed
BRIDGES - Publishable summary - CORDIS · 2015. 11. 13. · BRIDGES - Publishable summary The Security dimension of Copernicus encompasses three main areas: Border Surveillance, Maritime
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
BRIDGES - Publishable summary
The Security dimension of Copernicus encompasses three main areas: Border Surveillance,
Maritime Surveillance and Support to EU External Action (SEA). The Copernicus Security
services are envisaged to be deployed in 2015; therefore their governance structures and
the operational services need to be in place.
The overall objective of the BRIDGES project, coordinated by the EU Satellite Centre (EU
SatCen), was the development of several potential models of governance for future
Copernicus Security services in particular in support to EU External Action.
In order to support the EC in the smooth implementation of the service while ensuring the
continuity and scaling-up of service provision, the BRIDGES consortium has studied the
legal and political framework, evaluated different governance options and defined a
roadmap for the future development of the services beyond the BRIDGES project.
During the project lifetime, particular attention was given to follow the political framework
evolution in accordance with the progressive adoption of the Copernicus Regulation.
The involvement of the stakeholders during the entire project duration was also of strategic
importance and has been very successful since the beginning of the project. Many
stakeholders, such as European External Action Service (EEAS) including Crisis
Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD), MD Crisis Response and Operational
Coordination (MD CROC) and EU Intelligence Analysis Centre (INTCEN); European
Commission (including DG ENTR, DG ECHO, Joint Research Centre, etc.), ESA, EDA
and Member States, participated actively in the project.
One of the main concerns expressed during the BRIDGES stakeholder consultation was the
issue of the protection of the Security interests of the Union and its Member States. SEA
services address sensitive topics usually related to the foreign policies of Member States.
Governance options studied within the project were put in practice in the framework of the
G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT FP7 projects, the two projects implementing the pre-
operational services for Support to EU External Action.
These projects clearly indicate that the users require a fully operational service
accompanied by appropriate governance as soon as possible, as the current pre-operational
services do not have the capacity to fully meet their needs.
The main conclusion and policy recommendation is that the most promising and cost-
effective governance model is based on a decentralized approach in which the SatCen has
the role of operator of Copernicus services in support to EU External Action.
Summary description of project context and objectives
In the context of the GMES/Copernicus programme (Global Monitoring for Environment and
Security), BRIDGES was aimed at developing scenarios and implementation options for the
future governance of the security dimension of GMES/COPERNICUS. Taking into account
the current institutional framework, the project has also considered the potential role of the
European Union Satellite Centre (EUSC), the only operational EU Agency supporting EU
Missions and Operations as well as decision-making by delivering geospatial information.
GMES/COPERNICUS services for Security applications are approaching operational
maturity. Pre-operational services in the fields of border control, maritime surveillance and
support to external action are benefitting from development and user engagement through a
number of FP projects.
BRIDGES has therefore examined, by means of a structured stakeholder dialogue, the
technical, financial and legal implications of several governance scenarios in the context of
future operational deployment of GMES/COPERNICUS services in the field of Security.
BRIDGES was aimed at supporting the definition of the future governance of operational
GMES/COPERNICUS services for Security applications including a possible role of the
European Union Satellite Centre, through a structured dialogue among stakeholders.
The EUSC could serve as the natural interface between GMES/COPERNICUS services and
Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)/CSDP users. In addition, it is ideally situated
to support the identification of options for a coordinated approach to Space data access in the
Security field.
Governance relates to consistent management, cohesive policies, guidance, processes and
decision-rights for a given area of responsibility.
A fair governance implies that mechanisms function in a way that allows the executives (the
"agents") to respect the rights and interests of the stakeholders (the "principals").
Main S & T results The Copernicus Services in Support to EU External Action entered their pre-operational
phase in the framework of the G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT FP7 projects.
A service portfolio has been issued within the SEA Working Group under the leadership of
DG ENTR following an extensive and detailed consultation with the user community,
building on the considerable user engagement work performed by precursor projects (e.g. G-
MOSAIC). The experience acquired through the G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT projects clearly
indicates that the users require a fully operational service as soon as possible, as the current
pre-operational services do not have the capacity to fully meet their needs. State of play of