Breast Cancer in Eastern Europe and Central Asia Julie R. Gralow, M.D. Professor and Director, Breast Medical Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Dec 22, 2015
Breast Cancer in Eastern Europe and
Central Asia
Julie R. Gralow, M.D.Professor and Director, Breast Medical Oncology
University of Washington School of MedicineFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Top 10 Cancers in Women: Central/Eastern Europe vs USA
Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide
Globocan 2008 data
Incidence Mortality
Factors Associated with Global Differences in Breast Cancer Survival
• Low awareness and education of the public as well as health care providers
• Limited screening• Reduced health care access• Later stage at diagnosis• Limited treatments available• Cultural barriers to care
Many of these factors are addressable without major monetary investments
The Development of the Eastern Europe/Central Asia Breast Cancer Advocacy ProjectEngaging Patient Advocates in Cancer Education, Outreach and Policy-making
Ukraine Breast Cancer Assistance Project
1997-2000
• Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH)
• Ukrainian Ministry of Health
• US Agency for International Development (USAID)
• University of Washington
Why Was the US Government Interested in Funding a Ukraine Breast
Cancer Project?
Chernobyl MuseumKiev, Ukraine
Cancer Risk and Ionizing Radiation
Exposure
Most strongly linked to thyroid cancer,
leukemia and breast cancer
Contaminated Areas Following 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power
Plant Accident• Country Size of contaminated area (km2)
37–185 kBq/m2 >185 kBq/m2 • Russia 49,800 8,100 • Belarus 29,900 16,600 • Ukraine 37,200 5,700 • Sweden 12,000 • Finland 11,500 • Austria 8,600 • Norway 5,200 • Bulgaria 4,800
Hatch M et al, Epidem Reviews 2005
What Has Happened with Breast Cancer Risk Post-Chernobyl?
• Increase in premenopausal breast cancer in women from contaminated areas of Ukraine close to Chernobyl compared with Ukraine female population rates– Standardized incidence ratio = 1.50, 95 percent
confidence interval: 1.27, 1.73
Prysyazhnyuk AY et al. Cancer incidence in Ukraine after the Chernobyl accident. In: Chernobyl: message for the 21st century. Proceedings of the
Sixth Chernobyl Sasakawa Medical Cooperation Symposium 2002.
Ukraine Breast Cancer Assistance Project Goals
• Primary aim: to strengthen breast cancer early detection, diagnosis, treatment in 3 cities in Ukraine
• Additional key objective: to improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients
Assessment of Treatment Practice in Ukraine
Kiev City Oncology Hospital
Fighting the Crab – Kiev, Ukraine
Assessment of Treatment Practice in Ukraine
• Limited discussion of disease + treatment – “Don’t say the Word”
• Treatment decisions based on drug cost/availability, not science
• Number of cases treated and exact regimens difficult to determine
• Very low doses of chemotherapy used – “Ukrainian women cannot tolerate Western doses”
Ukraine Breast Cancer Assistance Project: Odessa Chemotherapy Trial
• “Western” doses of chemotherapy safe and effective
• Education + experience with clinical trials
• Presentation of results by Ukrainians at national + international conferences
• Consent process created dialogue between physician and patient
Chernihiv Pilot Breast Cancer Screening Program
PATH Psychosocial Support Project for Breast Cancer
Survivors
Breast Cancer in Ukraine: PATH Psychosocial Support Project
• Limited discussion of disease and treatment – “Don’t say the word”
• Interventions: Improving patient understanding, public awareness– Development of educational
materials for patients, families, public
– Development of a survivor support and outreach network through training
– Exchange visits– Psychosocial support by health
care providers and survivors
Lives Renewed: The Emergence of a Breast Cancer Survivor Movement in Ukraine
Bishop A, et al. Reprod Health Matters 9:126-134, 2001
• In 1997:– No breast support groups (or even the concept of
patient support systems or services) existed in Ukraine• 1997-2000:
– PATH project educated breast cancer patients, encouraged establishment of patient survivor groups
• By 2001: – Advocates from 15 Ukrainian cities had begun
providing mutual support in an organized way– Annual breast cancer walk (“March for Life and Hope”)
organized by breast cancer advocates in Kiev
From “Don’t Say the Word” in 1997 to the 1st “March for Life and Hope” in 2001
Kiev, Ukraine
Contiuation of the Ukraine Breast Cancer
Survivorship Movement• 1999: no breast cancer survivor groups• 2001: survivor groups in 15 cities, 12 oblasts • Early 2005: national association of survivor groups
formed• 2011: breast cancer survivor groups in 22 cities,
representing nearly all of the country’s 25 oblasts• Breast cancer support groups throughout Ukraine
now provide regular opportunities for women to receive the emotional support that contributes to their healing
Successor to PATH Project Eastern European/Central Asia Breast Cancer
Advocacy Forums
Vilnius, Lithuania 2003Kiev, Ukraine 2005
Minsk, Belarus 2007Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 2009
Vilnius, Lithuania 2011?Tbilisi, Georgia 2013
Breast cancer patients, advocates, health care professionals, policy makers, pharmaceutical representatives
Goals of Eastern Europe/Central Asia Breast Cancer Advocacy Conferences
• To combat breast cancer by building advocacy groups with skills to address inadequacy in information, inequity in treatment and care, and injustice in breast cancer early detection, screening, and prevention
Goals of Eastern Europe/Central Asia Breast Cancer Advocacy Conferences
• Raise awareness of the impact of breast cancer on society• Provide information on critical breast cancer issues to
promote community activism• Establish health care standards for women with breast
cancer• Understand what women with breast cancer want and need,
and how to address those needs• Bring together doctors, patients and activists as equals
around a common cause• Connect isolated women to international communities for
collaboration• Establish patient-doctor dialog and focus health care to the
patient
1st Eastern European Breast Cancer Advocacy ConferenceVilnius, Lithuania 2003
2nd Eastern European Breast Cancer Advocacy Conference
Kiev, Ukraine 2005
3rd Eastern European Breast Cancer Advocacy Conference
Minsk, Belarus 2007
Democracy Building through Breast Cancer Advocacy
Fulfullment Report of In Rays of Hope (Belarus NGO) to US Embassy
• Throughout US history, great social advancements such as abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, and civil rights evolved not from government initiative, but from voluntary grassroots movements. Each began with a group of passionate people coming together around a common cause.
• The Breast Cancer Advocacy Conference in Minsk was a momentous occasion in grassroots activism. By coming together with a passion to combat the impact of breast cancer in Belarus, conference participants set a course to change how the issue will be recognized at all levels.
Democracy Building through Breast Cancer Advocacy
Fulfillment Report of In Rays of Hope (Belarus NGO) to US Embassy
• As a result, breast cancer early detection, screening and prevention will become a national priority in Belarus.
• By inviting international participants, the conference planted seeds for similar grassroots mobilization efforts throughout the former Soviet Union.
4th Eastern European Breast Cancer Advocacy Conference
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 2009
Eastern Europe/Central Asia Breast Cancer Advocacy Conferences
Communicating, Sharing Ideas, Collaborating
Vilnius, Lithuania 2003 Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 2009(Kazakhstan van!)
Kyrgyzstan Conference 2009
5th Eastern European Breast Cancer Advocacy ConferenceVilnius, Lithuania 2011
2007 Institute of Medicine Report on Cancer Control Opportunities in Low-
and Middle-Income Countries Sloan FA, et al, National Academies Press, 2007
• Advocacy has a key role to play in bringing the public’s concerns about cancer to decision makers
• Summary recommendations: Advocacy– Active support and assistance of cancer advocacy in
low- and middle-resource countries– Suggested activities:
» Set up advocacy networks within countries, regions, and internationally
» Identify successful approaches to cancer advocacy and replicate/adapt for use in other settings
» Provide hands-on training and technical assistance
A global call to action for cancer in low-and middle-income countries is
beginning to emerge….
New Initiatives
Evidence for the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Cancer Care and Control
in Countries of Low or Middle Income
• Much can be done without the latest and most expensive technologies
• Task and infrastructure shifting could benefit the health systems of even wealthy countries
• Expansion of treatments for MDR-TB and AIDS in poor countries shows that new initiatives for care of complex diseases can be effective and strengthen health systems
• Coordinated financing and procurement can secure reduced prices and increased access to interventions
• Demonstration programs show that effective cancer diagnosis and treatment can be introduced even in rural areas of low-income countries in which specialized services are absent
Farmer P, et al. Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: a call to action. Lancet 376, 2010
Closing the Cancer Divide:A Blueprint To Expand
Access In Low And Middle Income Countries
A Report Of The Global Task Force On Expanded AccessTo Cancer Care And Control
Released October 28, 2011
http://ghsm.hms.harvard.edu/uploads/pdf/ccd_report_111027.pdf
New InitiativesUN High-level Meeting on the Prevention
and Control of Non-communicable Diseases
September 19-20, 2011
New InitiativesPink Ribbon Red Ribbon Campaign
Launched September 13, 2011• Partnership to leverage public and private investments
in global health to combat cervical and breast cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, particularly in HIV+ women– George W. Bush Institute– U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
(PEPFAR)– Susan G. Komen for the Cure– Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
• initial commitments of $75 million over five years
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2011/09/172244.htm
Breast Cancer Advocacy: What Next?Collaboration between Fred Hutchinson
Cancer Research Center and Uganda Cancer Institute
• Medical Oncology fellowship training agreement since 2004
• Seattle and Ugandan researchers collaborate to study and treat infection-related cancers
• FHCRC-Uganda joint Cancer Center under construction in Kampala (groundbreaking October 4, 2011)