1 BRAHMS BRAHMS Spin and p+p Spin and p+p results results J.H. Lee (BNL) for BRAHMS Collaboration • Short Introduction • Preliminary Results on ,K,p Single Spin Asymmetries and Spectra from Run5 at high-x F /rapidities • Summary/Prospects June 8 th 2006 RHIC Users’ Meeting
BRAHMS Spin and p+p results. Short Introduction Preliminary Results on p ,K,p Single Spin Asymmetries and Spectra from Run5 at high-x F /rapidities Summary/Prospects. J.H. Lee (BNL) for BRAHMS Collaboration. June 8 th 2006 RHIC Users’ Meeting. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
BRAHMSBRAHMS Spin and p+p Spin and p+p resultsresults
J.H. Lee (BNL)for BRAHMS Collaboration
• Short Introduction• Preliminary Results on ,K,p Single Spin
Asymmetries and Spectra from Run5 at high-xF/rapidities• Summary/Prospects
• Large SSAs have been observed at forward rapidities in hadronic reactions: E704/FNAL and STAR/RHIC
• SSA is suppressed in naïve parton models (~smq/Q )
• Non-zero SSA at partonic level requires- Spin Flip Amplitude, and - Relative phase
• SSA: Unravelling the spin-orbital motion of partons?
3
Beyond Naïve Parton Models to accommodate large Beyond Naïve Parton Models to accommodate large SSASSA
• Spin and Transverse-Momentum-Dependent parton distributions
-”Final state” in Fragmentation (Collins effect), -”Initial state” in PDF (Sivers effect) • Twist-3 matrix effects -Hadron spin-flip through gluons and hence the quark mass is
replaced by ΛQCD
-Efremov,Teryaev (final state) -Qiu,Sterman (initial state) • Or combination of above -Ji, Qiu, Vogelsang, Yuan…
Challenge to have a consistent partonic description: -Energy dependent SSA vs xF,pT, -Flavor dependent SSA -Cross-section
4
Determination of Single Spin Asymmetry: ADetermination of Single Spin Asymmetry: ANN
• Asymmetries are defined as AN = /P • For non-uniform bunch intensities
and the yield of in a given kinematic bin with the beam spin direction is N+ (up) and N- (down).• The polarization P of the beam was ~50% in the RHIC Run-5 (Blue beam)• Beam polarization P from on-line measurements:(systematic uncertainty ~15%)
5
SSA measurements in BRAHMSSSA measurements in BRAHMS
BRAHMS measures identified hadrons (,K,p,pbar) in kinematic ranges of 0<Y<3.5 and 0.2 <pT<4 • pT dependent SSA in 0 < x < 0.35 (and -0.35 < x < 0) utilizing blue (and yellow) beam (xF, pT, flavor-dependent AN)• Cross-section of hadron production (Theoretical consistency)Data: • Run-4: First SSA measurements in BRAHMS• Run-5: pp at √s = 200 GeV 2.5 pb-1 recorded (this Talk)• Run-6: pp at √s = 62 GeV planned (Energy dependence)This talk will focus on AN(±,K±,p,pbar) in 0.1 < x < 0.35 from Run5
6
• Covers ~70% of pp inelastic cross-section (41mb)• 3.25 < ||< 5.25 range• Vertex resolution (z)~ 1.6cm• Main relative luminosity monitor for SSA analysis • ±80cm in z used in the analysis
• AN(K): positive ~ AN(K): positive ≠ 0 for 0.2 <xF <0.3• AN for lower and higher xF require including extended PID and lower
field setting data: Work in progress but statistically challenging • Consistent with un-scaled BKK FF: in disagreement with naïve
expectations
K+
K-
14
Forward proton and pbar production in pp at √s=200 Forward proton and pbar production in pp at √s=200 GeVGeV
• proton and pbar production at high-y, pT
:Very different production mechanism (fragmentation vs. baryon transport)
• p/+ >> pbar/- (~x10)
BRAHMS
Preliminary
15
AANN of proton and pbar of proton and pbar
• AN(pbar) ≠ 0 and positive • AN(p) ~ 0: At this kinematic region, protons are mostly from
polarized beam proton, but only ones showing AN ~0 • Need theoretical inputs
p
pbar
16
Charged Hadron production at Forward vs NLO pQCD Charged Hadron production at Forward vs NLO pQCD
• NLO pQCD describes data at forward rapidity at 200 GeV• - ,K+ are described best by mKKP (Kniehl-Kramer-Potter) than Kretzer
FF• pbar is described best by AKK (Albino-Kniehl-Kramer) FF (light flavor
separated) (NLO pQCD Calculations done by W. Vogelsang. mKKP: “modified” KKP for charge separations for and K)
BRAHMS
Preliminary
17
SummarySummary
BRAHMS has obtained particle spectra and single transverse spin asymmetries for ±,K±, p, and pbar in √s =200 GeV pp
collisionsat RHIC in the xF range of 0.1 to 0.35• Cross-section described by NLO pQCD (with updated/modified
FFs)• Proton production requires extra production mechanism in
addition to fragmentation even at high-pT • AN(): positive ~(<) AN(): negative: 5-10% in 0.1 < xF < 0.3 increasing with xF and decreasing with pT
AN() in agreement with Twist-3 calculations • First SSA Results on K, p in 0.1 < xF < 0.3 - AN(K) ~ AN(K): positive - AN(p) ~0, AN(pbar): positive AN(K) in disagreement with naïve expectation of small sea quark polarization. Lack of understanding of p, pbar
polarization: Need more theoretical inputs.
18
BRAHMS SSA Measurements at 62 GeVBRAHMS SSA Measurements at 62 GeV
• BRAHMS will measure SSA at 62 GeV in RHIC/Run6
• Acceptance will reach kinematic limit, but SSA measurement up to xF~ 0.6 with statistical significance
• Measurements at 62 GeV offers an opportunity to address an intermediate energy (RHIC-FNAL) to clarify to what degree the SSA are describable by pQCD, or is a ‘soft’ physics effect.
19
Theoretical ChallengesTheoretical Challenges
• BRAHMS xF, pT, flavor, and energy-dependent SSA and cross-section measurements:
ingredient for consistent (partonic) description at RHIC energy regime: Exciting theoretical challenges • We will work on our part: -Expect to have interesting results from 62 GeV Run6 -Minimizing experimental systematic uncertainties -Extending kinematic coverage
20
I.Arsene7, I.G. Bearden6, D. Beavis1, S. Bekele6 , C. Besliu9, B. Budick5, H. Bøggild6 , C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen6, P. Christiansen6, R. Clarke9,
R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje6, K. Hagel7, H. Ito10, A. Jipa9, J. I. Jordre9, F. Jundt2, E.B.
Johnson10, C.E.Jørgensen6, R. Karabowicz3, E. J. Kim4, T.M.Larsen11, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.
Lee4, S.Lindal11, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, M. Murray10, J. Natowitz7, B.S.Nielsen6,
D. Ouerdane6, R.Planeta3, F. Rami2, C. Ristea6, O. Ristea9, D. Röhrich8, B. H. Samset11, D. Sandberg6, S. J. Sanders10, R.A.Sheetz1, P. Staszel3, T.S. Tveter11, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada7, H. Yang6, Z. Yin8, and I. S. Zgura9
1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA, 2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France3Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland,
4Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, 5New York University, USA6Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
7Texas A&M University, College Station. USA, 8University of Bergen, Norway 9University of Bucharest, Romania, 10University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA
11 University of Oslo Norway
The BRAHMS CollaborationThe BRAHMS Collaboration
21
Back-Up SlidesBack-Up Slides
22
Braod RAnge Hadron Magnetic Spectrometers• Designed to study nuclear reactions in broad kinematic range (y-pT)• 2 movable spectrometers with small solid angle measuring charged identified
hardrons precisely• Min-Bias Trigger Detector for pp (run05): ”CC” counter• Local polarimeter, SMD in Run-5 pp (analysis in progress)• 53 people from 12 institutions from 5 countries
23
Kinematic Variables and AcceptancesKinematic Variables and Acceptances
• The kinematic variables used for SSA: Feynman-x (xF) and pT
• Shown is the BRAHMS acceptance for the data taken at = 2.3° and the maximum field setting (7.2 Tm).
• Strong xF-pT correlation due to limited spectrometer solid
angle acceptance• The momentum resolution is
p/p~1% at 22 GeV/c
24
Relative luminosity Relative luminosity L = L+ /L- determinationdetermination
• Using CC in spin scaler ±80cm• Consistent with CC recorded in data stream• Relative luminosity calculated by Beam-Beam Counter and CC: < 0.3%• Systematic effect on bunch number dependent beam width: negligible
25
Anti-particle/Particle ratios at y~3 and NLO comparisons Anti-particle/Particle ratios at y~3 and NLO comparisons