Top Banner
General Principles of Law 1 Part 1 : Contract law Br. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws Centre for Foundation Studies International Islamic University Malaysia Br. Mahyuddin Daud 1
39

Br. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws Centre for Foundation Studies International Islamic University Malaysia Br. Mahyuddin Daud1.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Maud Townsend
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Slide 1
  • Br. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws Centre for Foundation Studies International Islamic University Malaysia Br. Mahyuddin Daud1
  • Slide 2
  • Why do we need contract law? 1. Ensure the parties to a contract / agreement keep to their promises 2. The keeping of promises reinforces the social bonds of mutual confidence and security amongst the parties 3. Moral obligation to keep promises 4. It forms part of the principle of fairness as enshrined in the theory of law Br. Mahyuddin Daud2
  • Slide 3
  • FORMATION OF CONTRACT Br. Mahyuddin Daud3
  • Slide 4
  • What is a Contract? An agreement Between 2 or more parties Intention to be bound by such agreement Consideration is provided Br. Mahyuddin Daud4
  • Slide 5
  • Other definitions John Salmond A contract is an agreement creating and defining the obligations between 2 or more parties Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2003. pp. 523. Economics: Principles in action A contract is an agreement between 2 or more parties, that if it contains the elements of a valid legal agreement, is enforceable by law Br. Mahyuddin Daud5
  • Slide 6
  • Differences between Unilateral & Bilateral Contracts Unilateral Only 1 party assumes obligation, the other does not promise anything in return Bilateral Both parties assume obligation & exchange promises Br. Mahyuddin Daud6
  • Slide 7
  • Unilateral contract Ahmad promised to pay Murad RM 1,000 if Murad found Ahmads lost kitten: Ahmad assumes the obligation to pay if Murad found his lost kitten Murad does not promise anything in return This is a unilateral contract! E.g. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. where the Court upheld that the company made a valid unilateral offer to the whole world at large Br. Mahyuddin Daud7
  • Slide 8
  • Bilateral contract Ahmad promises to pay Murad RM 1,000 and Murad promises to find Ahmads lost kitten. Both parties promised to do something / assume obligation This is a bilateral contract! Br. Mahyuddin Daud8
  • Slide 9
  • Elements of a valid contract Contract OfferAcceptanceIntentionConsideration Capacity to contract Br. Mahyuddin Daud9
  • Slide 10
  • OFFER Br. Mahyuddin Daud10
  • Slide 11
  • 1.Offer What does an offer means? An expression of willingness by the offeror to enter into an agreement with the offeree. Prof. Treitel: Offer is an expression of willingness to contract, on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed, the offeree. Br. Mahyuddin Daud11
  • Slide 12
  • OFFEROR OFFEREE OFFER Br. Mahyuddin Daud12
  • Slide 13
  • Termination of an offer Offer can be terminated by several ways: 1. When the terms of the offer allows it to be open for certain time, and upon expiry of that time, the offer will lapse 2. Offer will lapse after a reasonable length of time has passed Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v. Montefiore -A 5 months of time gap lapses the offer to buy shares because the price of shares could fluctuate quickly Br. Mahyuddin Daud13
  • Slide 14
  • Cont 3. If the offeror, makes an offer, with certain preconditions to be fulfilled, by the offeror before acceptance, upon failure to fulfill such preconditions, shall make the offer lapses Financings Ltd v. Stimson 4. An offer will lapse upon its rejection Br. Mahyuddin Daud14
  • Slide 15
  • Cont 5. An offer will lapse once it is being countered (counter-offer) 6. Death of the offeror & offeree 7. Withdrawal of an offer Once an offeror withdraws an offer, the offer will be terminated However, withdrawal of an offer will take effect upon its communication to the offeree Ex: Byrne & Co v. Leon Van Tienhoven Withdrawal must be communicated to the offeree Br. Mahyuddin Daud15
  • Slide 16
  • Cont Withdrawal of an offer (unilateral contracts) The legal principle: Once the offeree has started to perform (Dahlia Ltds case) or had partially performed (Errington v. Errington) on a unilateral contract, offeror cannot revoke his offer. But, there is an exception to this principle, i.e. unilateral offer entered into between an estate agent & landowner. Landowner can revoke his offer at any time before the sale is completed although the agent had made extensive efforts to find a buyer. (Luxors case) Br. Mahyuddin Daud16
  • Slide 17
  • Ignorance of an offer Principle: If the offeree knows about the offer, then he is entitled for the reward Williams v. Carwardine : D offered $20 to anyone who provided D with information that lead to the discovery of a murderer. P provided such information not with the intention to get the reward, but to help. The court held that she was entitled to the reward since she was aware about the offer Exception: If the offeree knows about the offer, but forgets, he is deemed to have ignored the offer, and he is not entitled for the reward R v. Clarke Br. Mahyuddin Daud17
  • Slide 18
  • INVITATION TO TREAT Br. Mahyuddin Daud18
  • Slide 19
  • Invitation to Treat Definition: It is an indication of a persons willingness to negotiate a contract It is a contractual process which does not bring any legal implication, unlike offer. Once an offer is made, it is subject to acceptance by the other party. ITT means that the party shows his willingness to negotiate a contract But, offer shows willingness of an offeror to enter into contract ITTOffer Acceptanc e Contract Br. Mahyuddin Daud19
  • Slide 20
  • What would be considered as ITT? Invitatio n to Treat Advertise ments Others Display of Goods Br. Mahyuddin Daud20
  • Slide 21
  • Display of Goods Legal principle: Goods which are displayed on shelves or in the windows of shops are generally regarded as invitation to treat. Ex: 1. Fisher v. Bell : display of flick knives only amount to ITT, therefore, no offer was made. 2. Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots Cash Chemist : display of medicine on shelves only amounted to ITT. Br. Mahyuddin Daud21
  • Slide 22
  • Advertisements 1. Unilateral contracts : advertisements will be treated as an offer due to minimum possibility of negotiation to happen (ex: Carlills case) 2.Bilateral contracts : advertisements will be treated as ITT due to higher possibility of negotiation to happen Br. Mahyuddin Daud22
  • Slide 23
  • Others Gibson v. Manchester City Council the letter informing of the price was only one step in the negotiations, therefore it was not an offer, but only an ITT Harvey v. Facey The Privy Council held that indication of lowest acceptable price does not constitute an offer to sell. Rather, it is considered an invitation to treat (i.e., to enter into negotiations). Br. Mahyuddin Daud23
  • Slide 24
  • Cont Auction the advertisement of an auction is a mere declaration of intention and not offer The auctioneers request for bids is an ITT, and each bid is an offer Tender - request for tenders is regarded as ITT Br. Mahyuddin Daud24
  • Slide 25
  • ACCEPTANCE Br. Mahyuddin Daud25
  • Slide 26
  • Definitions Acceptance is an unconditional agreement to all the terms of that offer. It also signifies a final and unqualified expression of assent to the terms of an offer Br. Mahyuddin Daud26
  • Slide 27
  • Methods of Acceptance 1. Verbal / Express Acceptance 2. Conduct / Implied Acceptance 3. Silence Br. Mahyuddin Daud27
  • Slide 28
  • 1.Verbal / Express acceptance The most common method of acceptance It is where the offeree accepts the offer straightforwardly / directly. The offeree may use any technology to communicate his acceptance, i.e. telephone, fax, letters, e-mail as long as the acceptance is in a direct form. Br. Mahyuddin Daud28
  • Slide 29
  • 2. Acceptance by conduct The offeree signifies his acceptance by doing something that conform to the offerors offer Ex: Brogden v Metropolitan Rail Co where the act of Brogden supplying the new order of coal amounted to acceptance of the railway companys offer by conduct Br. Mahyuddin Daud29
  • Slide 30
  • 3. Acceptance by silence General rule: Silence does not amount to acceptance unless it is otherwise agreed by both parties. Felthouse v. Bindley : (the sale of horse) the act of nephew not responding to the uncles offer letter was an act of silence. The court was uncertain whether he was accepting the uncles offer or not. Br. Mahyuddin Daud30
  • Slide 31
  • Communication Acceptance will only take effect upon its communicated to the offeror. If acceptance is not communicated, then there will be no contract Br. Mahyuddin Daud31
  • Slide 32
  • Exceptions to the communication rule In these situations, acceptance need not to be communicated: 1. When the terms of the offer states that acceptance need not to be communicated to the offeror Ex: Carlill v. Carbolic where the advertisement (offer) stated that the offeree only need to perform the required act (consumption of the medicine). Br. Mahyuddin Daud32
  • Slide 33
  • Cont 2. Offeror fails to take notify of the acceptance by offeree i.e. (conduct of the offeror) 3. Postal rule (Ordinary post) Principle: If acceptance is made by post, acceptance will take effect as soon as the letter is posted, not when it is communicated. (automatic acceptance) This rule was laid down in the case of Adams v. Lindsell (sale of sheep fleeces) Br. Mahyuddin Daud33
  • Slide 34
  • Exceptions to the postal rule The postal rule (automatic acceptance) will not apply in these circumstances: 1. The terms of an offer requires acceptance to be communicated 2. Instantaneous communication Communication will take effect immediately See Entoress case Br. Mahyuddin Daud34
  • Slide 35
  • Entores v. Miles Far East Corp Facts: P = London co. D = US (based in Amsterdam). They contracted through telex. Later, P alleged that D breached their contract. The procedural rule was that if they wanted to brought the matter in English court, the contract must be made in England Issue: Whether the court had the jurisdiction to hear the matter? Held: In order to answer this issue, the court need to decide where was the contract concluded, whether at London or Amsterdam? Br. Mahyuddin Daud35
  • Slide 36
  • Cont Offeree AcceptanceOfferor Offer Br. Mahyuddin Daud36 Amsterdam London
  • Slide 37
  • Cont Since instantaneous rule applied, the contract was concluded at London. Therefore, the court has the jurisdiction to hear the case. Br. Mahyuddin Daud37
  • Slide 38
  • METHODS TO APPROACH PROBLEMATIC QUESTIONS Br. Mahyuddin Daud38
  • Slide 39
  • Br. Mahyuddin Daud39