SUBMITTAL REVIEW Submittal: No. 008 Spec Section: 14 2010 – Passenger Elevators Reviewed By: Tripp Lewton, Comma-Q Architecture Date: May 17, 2012 Project: BPS – Belgrade Elementary School Location: Belgrade, MT Job Number: 11-03 Copy to: File, Owner This review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Corrections or comments made on the submittals during this review do not relieve the CONTRACTOR from compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. An opinion of equivalence of a specific item shall not be interpreted as an opinion of equivalence of an assembly of which the item is a component. Submittal review comments have been made within this format and not on the submittal sheets according to the following: NEN No Exceptions Noted GCAN Generally Conforms as Noted RAN Rejected for Reason as Noted IAS Incomplete as Submitted 1. 14 2010 1.05 B Passenger Elevators Shop Drawings GCAN Notes: 1. See Architect’s comments. 2. Per review comments by Scott Elders (Associated Construction Engineering): The electrical voltage on the shop drawings needs to CHANGE: FROM: 208V, 3 Phase TO: 480V, 3 Phase END OF REVIEW
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
This review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Corrections or comments made on the submittals during this review do not relieve the CONTRACTOR from compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. An opinion of equivalence of a specific item shall not be interpreted as an opinion of equivalence of an assembly of which the item is a component. Submittal review comments have been made within this format and not on the submittal sheets according to the following:
NEN No Exceptions Noted GCAN Generally Conforms as Noted RAN Rejected for Reason as Noted IAS Incomplete as Submitted
1. 14 2010 1.05 B Passenger Elevators Shop Drawings GCAN
Notes: 1. See Architect’s comments. 2. Per review comments by Scott Elders (Associated Construction Engineering): The electrical voltage on
the shop drawings needs to CHANGE: FROM: 208V, 3 Phase TO: 480V, 3 Phase
Project: BPS – Belgrade Elementary School Location: Bozeman, MT Job Number: 11-03 Copy to: File
we are sending you :Attached
Under separate cover the following:
Shop drawings: Copy of letter: Specification: Prints: Samples: Drawings: Other:
these are transmitted as checked below: Approved: Approved as corrected: Revise and resubmit: Rejected: For your signature: For return : For review & comment:
Matt, please review the attached submittal, please return an electronic version to our office with your comments.
Thanks
TRANSMITTAL
May 14, 2012 To: Associated Construction Engineering Attention: Scott Elders; Andy Hansen From: Tripp Lewton Project: BPS – Belgrade Elementary School Location: Belgrade, MT Job Number: 11-03
Copy to: File
we are sending you : Attached
Under separate cover
the following: Shop drawings: Copy of letter: Specification: Prints: Samples: Drawings: Other:
these are transmitted as checked below: Approved: Approved as corrected: Revise and resubmit: Rejected: For your signature: For return : For review & comment:
Scott, Please review the attached submittal for electrical considerations. Andy, Please review the attached for heat load considerations. Return an electronic version to our office with your comments. If no comments are necessary, please send an email
indicating drawings are approved without exception. Thanks
MARTEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL1203 South Church AvenueBozeman, MT 59715-5801Telephone: (406) 586-8585 Facsimile: (406) 586-8646 DATE 05/14/12 JOB NO. 12-001
CQ: RESILIENT FLOORINGSEE SECTION 14 2010 2.02 A. 2. b. 5.
NO EXCEPTS NOTEDFabrication / installation may be undertaken. Approval does not authorize changes in the Contract Sum or Contract Time unless stated by Change Order of Con-struction Change Directive.
GENERALLY CONFORMSAS NOTED
REVISE AND RESUBMIT
REJECTED FOR REASON AS NOTED
Fabrication / installation MAY NOT. In resubmitting limit cor-rections to the items marked.
Review and approval are only for conformance with the information given and the design concept of the Project as expressed in the Contract Documents. Review and approval of the submittals are not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other details such as dimensions and quantities or for substantiating instructions for the installation or performace of equipment or systems all of whitch remain the responsibility of the Contractor as required by the Contract Documents. The Architect’s review and approval of the Contractor’s sub-mittal shall not relieve the contractor from any obligation containted in the Contract Documents. The architect’s review and approval shall not constitute approval of any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or any safety precau-������������� ������������������������������������������������������������approval of an assembly of which the item is a component.
By Date
approval of an
x
Tripp Lewton 5/17/12
Arch verify with ownerthat a new dedicatedPhone line will be set upfor the elevator phone