Top Banner
Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”
13

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Lacey Odgers
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

First Impressions

Janelle Heineke

“Anyone? Anyone?”

Page 2: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

Three studies.

How Much Do First Impressions Matter?

Page 3: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

Expressiveness/Warmth• The facial expressions demonstrated by the instructor were

appropriate (neither blank nor exaggerated).• The instructor used a lot of gestures to emphasize what was

being said.• The instructor smiled frequently.• The instructor's facial expression was generally pleasant

(rather than neutral or unpleasant).• The instructor's voice was warm and friendly.

Laura K. Guerrero & Tammy A. Miller, “Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses ,” Communication Education, 18 May 2009.

1. Nonverbal Behavior

e

Page 4: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

Composure/Fluency• The speaking rate the instructor used was appropriate (neither

too fast nor too slow). • The instructor's speaking style was fluent and smooth (s/he

avoided pauses, silences, uhs, etc).• The instructor demonstrated vocal confidence (s/he was neither

tense nor nervous sounding.• The instructor spoke without shaking or demonstrating nervous

twitches.• The instructor's movements seemed purposeful (s/he did not

fidget or appear nervous).

Laura K. Guerrero & Tammy A. Miller, “Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses ,” Communication Education, 18 May 2009.

1. Nonverbal Behavior

Page 5: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

Study of nonverbal behavior and initial impressions of instructor competence

•Four 10-minute segments of intro lectures from videotaped distance education courses were shown to 8 undergraduate classes in speech communication.

•Two classes viewed each videotape.

•180 students rated instructors on expressiveness/warmth, composure/fluency, articulation/clarity and eye contact.

•Instructors who were viewed as expressive, warm, and involved were most likely to be judged as highly competent and their course content is likely to be judged favorably, especially if they are not overly composed and fluent.

1. Nonverbal Behavior: Findings

Page 6: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• Students in 19 Psychology courses completed course evaluation surveys either before meeting the instructor or two weeks into the semester.

• Both groups then completed the course evaluation again at the end of the semester.

• Unlike evaluations completed prior to meeting the professor, students’ ratings two weeks into the semester did not differ from end-of-semester evaluations.

• Students considered first impressions more important than professor reputation.

Stephanie Buchert, Eric L. Laws, Jennifer M. Apperson, Norman J. Bregman, «First impressions and professor reputation: influence on student evaluations of instruction,” Soc Psychol Educ (2008) 11:397–408.

2. Effects of Professor Reputation versus First Impressions

Page 7: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• Female undergrads paid to rate the 39 clips of the teachers individually.

• 15 dimensions on a scale running from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very); no other training.

• Three 10-second segments (from first 10, middle ten, and last ten minutes of class).

• Each 10 second segment was played once with the audio turned down completely.

Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal, “Half a Minute: Predicting Teacher Evaluations From Thin Slices of Nonverbal Behavior and Physical Attractiveness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, Vol. 64, No. 3, 431-441.

3. Thirty Second Impressions (no sound!)

Page 8: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

3. Thirty Second Impressions (no sound!)

Correlations of Nonverbal Behaviors with College Student Ratings

Variable rOptimistic .84***Confident .82***Dominant .79**Active .77**Enthusiastic .76**Likable .73**Warm .67*Competent .56*Supportive .55*Professional 0.53Accepting 0.5Attentive 0.48Empathic 0.45Honest 0.32(Not) anxious 0.26* p<.05, **p<.01. ***p< .001.

Page 9: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

The correlation between ratings of teachers' physical attractiveness and the criterion variable was .32, suggesting that students' ratings of teachers were somewhat influenced

by the physical appearance of the teachers.

Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal, “Half a Minute: Predicting Teacher Evaluations From Thin Slices of Nonverbal Behavior and Physical Attractiveness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, Vol. 64, No. 3, 431-441.

3. Thirty-Second Impressions (no sound!)

Page 10: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• Subtle influences affect perceptions.

• These influences might be identifiable from thin slices of behavior.

• Teachers with higher ratings were judged more positively on affective dimensions of their personality from their nonverbal behavior:

• Confirming the importance of teacher affect (Abrami, Leventhal, & Perry, 1982; Babad, Bernieri, & Rosenthal, 1989; Harris & Rosenthal, 1985; Woolfolk & Woolfolk, 1977)

• Suggesting that better teachers might be higher in nonverbal sending accuracy, that is, in their ability to spontaneously communicate nonverbal information (Buck, 1979).

3. Implications

Page 11: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• The agreement between ratings of students who had known the teacher for a whole semester or the ratings of a supervisor who had probably known the teacher for even longer and the ratings based on thin slices suggests that some stable quality of the teacher was being communicated.

• Teachers should be made aware of the possible impact of their nonverbal behavior and perhaps trained in nonverbal skills (Smith, 1979; Wolfgang, 1979; Woolfolk & Brooks, 1983).

3. Implications

Page 12: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• Be on time.• Be organized.• Be yourself, be at ease.• Present yourself appropriately

(dress, grooming).• Smile!• Be open and confident.• Be positive.• Be courteous and attentive.• Eliminate distractions (cell phones …).

So … what?

Page 13: Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching First Impressions Janelle Heineke “Anyone? Anyone?”

Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching

• Be yourself.• Arrive early.• Introduce yourself effectively.

• Keep on topic.• Know what not to say.

• Explain the course organization, requirements, major assignments, and policies.

• Build a sense of community.• Plan to use at least one of the teaching methods you will

use during the course.• Provide an opportunity for students to ask questions.• Establish a culture of feedback. • Whet students’ appetites for course content.

So … what?