Boston Beer Company By: Vinh-Khoi Le, Tim Peterson, Daniel Tonkovich, and Amanda Yam
Jun 20, 2015
Boston Beer Company By: Vinh-Khoi Le, Tim Peterson, Daniel Tonkovich, and Amanda Yam
Inputs: Cash needed to acquire the raw materials The raw materials
Malt Hops Yeast Water Spices
The labor hours required in production
Inputs and Outputs
Inputs and Outputs (Cont.)
The equipment used in production Gristmill Mash Vessel Lauter Turn Whirlpool Vessel Fermentation Vessel “Bright Beer” Tank Bottling Machine
Output: Samuel Adams Boston Lager
Transmission of Information
Information regarding the characteristics of the beer are obtained via direct sampling throughout the brewing process and recorded in a database.
The Process
The process of making Samuel Adams Boston Lager is considered a batch
Malt Gristmill – Creates mixture of crushed malt
Mash Vessel
Water
The Process (Cont.)
Lauter Tun – vessel that will filter the liquid malt into a
substance called wort
Whirlpool Vessel – to remove protein from hops
and malt
Hops
The Process (Cont.)
Fermentation Vessel
Yeast
“Bright Beer” Tank
Hops to soak
Spices
Bottling
Supply Chain
The supply chain is efficient because it is aimed at managing the delivery and usage of the raw materials used in Boston Lager.
External Members of Supply Chain: Malts - purchased from one supplier Hops - purchased through four dealers Water - received via the tap from the city of Boston Packaging - multiple outside sources Glass bottle and labels - only one outside vendor
Supply Chain (Cont.)
Internal Customers The quality control department The bottling department
The Final link in the supply chain is the delivery of the finished Boston Lager to distributors and customers
Corporate Social Responsibility
Samuel Adams “Brewing the American Dream” Launched in 2008 Help low income, small business owners through loans
and mentoring programs
Sustainability Initiatives Increased usage of recycled materials in their packaging Encouraging consumers to recycle their bottles in
advertising campaigns
Operations Strategy
Second largest US beer maker Approximately 1% of the domestic market by sales
volume
“Better Beer” Craft brewers, specialty beers and most imports Higher price, quality, image and taste
Operations Strategy
Increased attention to the brewing process and the selection of raw material inputs Higher production costs
Hand-selected hops In-house brewing Tasting and Quality Control
Strong reputation with the craft beer industry Premium to be charged for its products.
Freshest Beer Program
Freshness Tag Buy back expired code Reduced time and temperature the Company’s beers
experience at wholesaler warehouses
Forecasting, production planning and cooperation with the wholesalers
Demand Forecasting
Demand has increased 5% to 7%
Freshest Beer Program Managing relations with
400 independent beer distributors
Seasonal beers Twelve year-round
varieties Four seasonal beers Accommodate
fluctuations with seasonal demand and taste
Capacity Management
Effective capacity: 5,720 kegs per day
Utilization rate: 44%
Process about 7,200 gallons at one time
Agreements with Third Parties if Demand Increases
Expand Pennsylvania and Ohio Facilities
Raw Material Inventory
External: Two-Row Malted Barley Reservoir Tap Water
Internal: Bavarian Hops Bottom-Feeding Yeast
Safety Stock? Sharing program w/
local breweries Some in handy
Work-In-Process Inventory
Unfinished “Juice”: Brewing Fermentation Lagering Finishing
Packaging materials
Distribute finished inventory to partners
Quality
User-Based & Process-Based Reliable Brand Consistent Tastes & Textures
Testing & sampling of material (raw & WIP) before and during main stages of process.
Inspection: Buyback Program Out-of-code Bacterial infection
TQM??
Assessing Process Performance
Internal Measurements Flow Time = 7.5 weeks or 52.5 days Flow Rate = 960 gallons per week or 137.1 gallons per
day About $26 million of Inventory On-site Control Labs and 14 Brewmasters
Assessing Process Performance (Cont.)
Customer-Focused Measurements Freshest Beer Program Only .5% of the Beer
Bought Back
Financial Measurements Net Income Increased
$19 million No Inventories and
Provisions for Excess or Expired Inventories
Recommendations
Successful in Quality, but not at Full Capacity
Continue to Reduce Buy-Back Quantity Reduce Amount of Excess Inventory to Distributors to
Increase Freshness
Improve Inspection Efficiency
Questions?