Bostenaru Sibiu 2014

HISTORY IN POETRY – THE 19TH CENTURY.MULTILINGUAL CORPUS AND CONNECTION OF ARCHIVE MATERIAL

Maria BOSTENARU DAN

Overview

Family context of the manuscript in history

The manuscript Digital work Discussion and conclusions

Family context of the manuscript in history

Family context

József Varga (1813-1894) – including 1848

Research by János Fekete Redemptus

Maria Theresia 1743 – Kiskunfélegyháza 1526 Turks

Ferenczszállás /Petofiszállás Dóczy commerciants

Dóczy Pál – Ödön Lechner Town hall 100 years

Danube Swabians

The manuscript

The manuscript (1)

Literary work of poetry (inst. of poetry) Autobiography Popular songs – incl. Kossuth nóták (inst. of

music) Location of Petöfi Verses of autobiography longer Parts end with drawings (costumes,

agriculture)

The manuscript (2)

History work 1848 Cholera epidemic Division of Ferenczszállás (agrar orientation:

cereals > wine) Arrival of commerciants and end of feudal

order redemption

Kiskún Museum 1870-1930 images

Textual and visual material lecture

Parts

1. Childhood, 2. Poor youth, 3. Life at the National Guard, 4. Sheppard life, 5. Life around 50 working the field, 6. Widowship, 7. Senile life

1848

Digital work

Digital work (1, 2)

Scanning the manuscript Transcription in MS word Transcription in today‘s language –

corpus (regionalism) Creation of speech (youtube) Translation – corpus Printed book and e-book

Digital work (3)

Connection to historical ressources Kiskunfélegyháza manual (archives

concerning the city – hardcopy) Reference to historic events or figures

the battle of Világos, the history of Ferenczszállás and (Külsö)

Galambos, the figures of Görgei and Laszlo Teleki

Linking as alternative to footnotes

Digital work (4)

Immaterial heritage for corpus Popular songs Drawings of costumes Agricultural habits Concepts

Dedication to achieve a national state Belief in God

Digital work (5)

Historical network connections Family tree Relationship to people and places in a

graph Ödön Lechner Fights in 1848

Discussion and conclusions

Discussion

Duty to publish – own affirmation (guest book)

Copy of the manuscript – different paper Different dates of the manscript (age of

50 and continued . 9th part)

Statement of age

Conclusion

Not architecture, but cultural heritage (cultural landscape – immaterial heritage)

Manuscript as such – material and subject of conservation studies/analysis

Digital publication – immaterial part 2014 ICOMOS year of Commemoration

Memory of the 19th century

The grave / cemeteries as landscape and as commemoration

NeDiMAH

Thank you!