Boss2 ppt ch12

SCIENCE

The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify and evaluate scientific methods and assumptions.

What is this scientist thinking as she evaluates the glass flask?

2

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

What is science?

Science rests upon reasoning that moves from observable, measurable facts, usually called data, to testable explanations for these facts. Scientists discover, observe, and collect facts in a systematic manner to explain data relationships. They then link these relationships through explanatory devices such as hypotheses. Modern science has a profound impact on our lives, and because it is so pervasive, we tend to perceive it as the natural method for obtaining knowledge about the world. However, we must recognize and evaluate the assumptions underlying science to ensure what we are learning is accurate and credible.

3

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Copernicus observed that the Earth revolves around the sun, and not vice versa.

4

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Assumptions underlying science

Science is the primary way Western culture perceives and interprets reality. However, it is important to keep in mind that science is a system created by humans and, as such, is based on a particular set of assumptions. These assumptions include empiricism, objectivity, materialism, predictability, and unity.

5

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Empiricism, objectivity, materialism, predictability, and unity

Empiricism—Sense experience is the source of truth. Objectivity—We can study the physical world without

bias. Materialism—Everything in the universe is made up of

physical matter. Predictability—The universe is composed of

interconnected causal relationships. Unity—The universe has an underlying, unified dynamic

structure.

6

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hot or Not?

Is science the best tool for learning about the world?

7

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Limitations of science

Despite its obvious strengths, scientific reasoning has some limitations. Empiricism and the use of sense experience limits science to observable, shared phenomena. Additionally, the basis of science, the existence of the physical world, cannot be empirically proven. Furthermore, quantum physics challenges the idea that reality is ultimately predictable and material, and that objective observation is even possible.

As critical thinkers, it is important to keep both the strengths and limitations of scientific reasoning in mind.

8

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Our brain’s tendency to impose order on random data contributed to the belief that there were canals on Mars.

9

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The religious belief that humans are a special creation is one of the underlying assumptions of modern science.

10

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The scientific method

The scientific method is the basis for generating scientific knowledge. It involves a series of steps.

Identify the problem. Develop an initial hypothesis. Gather additional information and refine the

hypothesis. Test the hypothesis. Evaluate the hypothesis based on the results of

testing or experimentation.

11

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Differences among Galapagos Island finch beaks, as illustrated by Darwin

12

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Margaret Mead’s attachment to her hypothesis and reliance on anecdotal evidence biased the way she gathered her information.

13

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Twin studies

14

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluating a scientific hypothesis

When evaluating a scientific hypothesis, the following criteria are appropriate:

Is it relevant to the problem under investigation? Is it consistent with well-established theories? Is it the simplest explanation for the problem? Does it provide a testable and falsifiable explanation

of the problem? Can it be used to predict the outcome of similar

events?

15

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Marie Curie

16

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Albert Einstein

17

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The hypothesis “all swans are white” was falsifiable.

18

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Distinguishing between science and pseudoscience

Pseudoscience is a body of explanations or hypotheses that, in an attempt to gain legitimacy, masquerades as science. Unlike science, which uses systematic observation, reasoning, and testing, pseudoscience is based on emotional appeals, superstition, and rhetoric. Astrology is an example of pseudoscience. Pseudoscience takes advantage of cognitive errors in our thinking, and is often used to persuade people, particularly the young, as a means to gain money or political support.

19

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Nostradamus’s prophecies tended to be so vague that they could only be “proven” after they had happened.

20

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Research methodology

Research methodology is a systematic approach to gathering and analyzing information based on established scientific procedures and techniques. One of these methodologies is experimentation. Three common types of experimentation are field experiments, controlled experiments, and single group (pretest-posttest) experiments. These experiments include elements such as independent variables, dependent variables, and confounding variables, and all use experimental material, the group or class of objects or subjects under study.

21

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hot or Not?

Are field experiments real scientific experiments?

22

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Jane Goodall used observation as a research method.

23

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Mice or other lab animals are often used as experimental subjects.

24

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluating experimental designs

Regardless of which type of experiment design is used, common evaluation criteria can be applied to test the validity of the experiment and its results. Well-designed experiments use the following criteria: Unbiased—The experiment has checks or controls to eliminate both

subject and experimenter bias. Measurement—The measurements used are appropriate and

reliable as well as accurate and precise. Replicable—The experiment can be reproduced by other scientists. Generality—The experimental results can be generalized to the

population under study.

25

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Ethical concerns in science

Although scientific experiments may be well designed and produce significant results, they may be inappropriate due to their violation of moral and ethical principles and guidelines. Ethical considerations of informed consent, rights, and nonmaleficence (no harm) are particularly important when dealing with human subjects. During World War II, Nazi doctors performed unethical experiments on Jews, prisoners of war, and other prisoners. These activities have also occurred in the United States, such as in the Tuskegee study.

26

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hot or Not?

Should pregnant women, or women who might become pregnant, be allowed to participate in drug tests?

27

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hot or Not?

Is it desirable, or even possible, for science to become value-neutral?

28

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Thomas Kuhn and scientific paradigms

In his work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), American physicist and science historian Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) challenged the idea that science is progressive and objective. Instead he argued that science, like other human enterprises, is a social construct—a product of its society. As such, it is biased by social expectations and professional norms that determine what is acceptable in terms of hypotheses and experimentation.

29

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Scientific revolutions and paradigm shifts

Kuhn argued in favor of three key concepts: normal science, paradigms, and scientific revolutions. Normal science refers to “research based upon one or more past achievements,” while paradigms, building on normal science, provide an accepted view of the world. A scientific revolution, or paradigm shift, occurs when a new scientific theory is developed to replace a problematic paradigm. Einstein’s theory of relativity is an example of a paradigm shift.

30

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

It took many years for continental-drift theory to be accepted by most people in the field.

31

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Conclusions

Science and scientific thinking has generated enormous benefit to humanity. However, as critical thinkers we must be aware of its limitations, the temptations of pseudoscience, and the possibilities of other explanations for phenomena. We must use evaluative criteria when considering scientific reasoning, and recognize that new ideas may hold answers to questions that existing paradigms cannot resolve.

32

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Evolution versus intelligent design

33

© 2012, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.