Top Banner
Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization
44

Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Mar 21, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Bonding in Methane andOrbital Hybridization

Page 2: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

tetrahedralbond angles = 109.5°bond distances = 110 pmbut structure seems inconsistent withelectron configuration of carbon

Structure of Methane

Page 3: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Electron configuration of carbon

2s

2p only two unpaired electrons

should form σbonds to only two hydrogen atoms

bonds should be at right angles to one another

Page 4: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p

Promote an electron from the 2s to the 2p orbital

sp3 Orbital Hybridization

Page 5: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p 2p

2s

sp3 Orbital Hybridization

Page 6: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp3 Orbital Hybridization

Mix together (hybridize) the 2s orbital and the three 2p orbitals

Page 7: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp3 Orbital Hybridization

2 sp3

4 equivalent half-filled orbitals are consistent with four bonds and tetrahedral geometry

Page 8: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Shapes of orbitals

s

p

Page 9: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Nodal properties of orbitals

s

p + –

+

Page 10: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Shape of sp3 hybrid orbitals

s

p + –

+

take the s orbital and place it on top of the p orbital

Page 11: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Shape of sp3 hybrid orbitals

s + p + –+

reinforcement of electron wave in regions where sign is the same destructive interference in regions of opposite sign

Page 12: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Shape of sp3 hybrid orbitals

sp hybrid

orbital shown is sp hybridanalogous procedure using three s orbitals and one p orbital gives sp3 hybridshape of sp3 hybrid is similar

+ –

Page 13: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Shape of sp3 hybrid orbitals

sp hybrid

hybrid orbital is not symmetricalhigher probability of finding an electron on one side of the nucleus than the otherleads to stronger bonds

+ –

Page 14: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

+ –

The C—H σ Bond in Methane

sp3s CH

H—C σ CH

gives a σ bond.

In-phase overlap of a half-filled 1s orbital of hydrogen with a half-filled sp3 hybrid orbital of carbon:

+

+

Page 15: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Justification for Orbital Hybridization

consistent with structure of methane

allows for formation of 4 bonds rather than 2

bonds involving sp3 hybrid orbitals are stronger than those involving s-s overlap or p-p overlap

Page 16: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp3 Hybridization and Bonding in Ethane

Page 17: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Structure of Ethane

CH3CH3

C2H6

tetrahedral geometry at each carbonC—H bond distance = 110 pmC—C bond distance = 153 pm

Page 18: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

In-phase overlap of half-filled sp3 hybridorbital of one carbon with half-filled sp3

hybrid orbital of another.Overlap is along internuclear axis to give a σbond.

The C—C σ Bond in Ethane

Page 19: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

The C—C σ Bond in Ethane

In-phase overlap of half-filled sp3 hybridorbital of one carbon with half-filled sp3

hybrid orbital of another.Overlap is along internuclear axis to give a σbond.

Page 20: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp2 Hybridization and Bonding in Ethylene

Page 21: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

C2H4

H2C=CH2

planarbond angles: close to 120°bond distances: C—H = 110 pm

C=C = 134 pm

Structure of Ethylene

Page 22: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p

Promote an electron from the 2s to the 2p orbital

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

Page 23: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p 2p

2s

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

Page 24: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

Mix together (hybridize) the 2s orbital and two of the three 2porbitals

Page 25: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

2 sp2

3 equivalent half-filled sp2 hybrid orbitals plus 1 p orbital left unhybridized

Page 26: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

2 sp2

2 of the 3 sp2 orbitalsare involved in σ bondsto hydrogens; the otheris involved in a σ bondto carbon

p

Page 27: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp2 Orbital Hybridization

2 sp2

p

σ

σσ

σσ

Page 28: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Ethylene

2 sp2

the unhybridized p orbital of carbon is involved in π bondingto the other carbon

p

Page 29: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Ethyleneππ Bonding in Ethylene Bonding in Ethylene

2 2 spsp22

pp

each carbon has an unhybridized 2each carbon has an unhybridized 2pp orbital orbital axis of orbital is perpendicular to the plane of the axis of orbital is perpendicular to the plane of the σσ bonds bonds

Page 30: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Ethyleneππ Bonding in Ethylene Bonding in Ethylene

2 2 spsp22

pp

side-by-side overlap of half-filledside-by-side overlap of half-filledpp orbitals gives a orbitals gives a π π bondbonddouble bond in ethylene has a double bond in ethylene has a σσ component and a component and a ππ component component

Page 31: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

1.18sp Hybridization

and Bonding in Acetylene

Page 32: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

C2H2

linearbond angles: 180°bond distances: C—H = 106 pm

CC = 120 pm

Structure of Acetylene

HC CH

Page 33: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p

Promote an electron from the 2s to the 2p orbital

sp Orbital Hybridization

Page 34: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2s

2p 2p

2s

sp Orbital Hybridization

Page 35: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp Orbital Hybridization

Mix together (hybridize) the 2s orbital and one of the three 2porbitals

Page 36: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

2p

2s

sp Orbital Hybridization

2 sp

2 equivalent half-filled sp hybrid orbitals plus 2 p orbitals left unhybridized

2 p

Page 37: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp Orbital Hybridization

1 of the 2 sp orbitalsis involved in a σ bondto hydrogen; the otheris involved in a σ bondto carbon

2 sp

2 p

Page 38: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

sp Orbital Hybridization

σ

σ

σ

2 sp

2 p

Page 39: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Acetylene

the unhybridized p orbitals of carbon are involved in separateπ bonds to the other carbon

2 sp

2 p

Page 40: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Acetyleneππ Bonding in Acetylene Bonding in Acetylene

one one ππ bond involves one of the p orbitals on each carbon bond involves one of the p orbitals on each carbonthere is a second there is a second ππ bond perpendicular to this one bond perpendicular to this one

2 2 spsp

2 2 pp

Page 41: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Acetyleneππ Bonding in Acetylene Bonding in Acetylene

2 2 spsp

2 2 pp

Page 42: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

π Bonding in Acetyleneππ Bonding in Acetylene Bonding in Acetylene

2 2 spsp

2 2 pp

Page 43: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Which Theory ofChemical Bonding is Best?

Page 44: Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization · Bonding in Methane and Orbital Hybridization. tetrahedral bond angles = 109.5° bond distances = 110 pm but structure seems inconsistent

Three Models

Lewismost familiar—easiest to apply

Valence-Bond (Orbital Hybridization)provides more insight than Lewis modelability to connect structure and reactivity to hybridization develops with practice

Molecular Orbitalpotentially the most powerful methodbut is the most abstractrequires the most experience to use effectively