Top Banner
Family Friendly Controversy Family Friendly Controversy Children’s Affective Reactions to BODY WORLDS Kimberly M. Burtnyk
19
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Family Friendly ControversyFamily Friendly Controversy Children’s Affective Reactions to

BODY WORLDS

Kimberly M. Burtnyk

Page 2: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

OutlineOutline

What is BODY WORLDS?

The Research Questions

The Research Design

The Research ResultsFocus on one question

Page 3: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

What is BODY WORLDS?What is BODY WORLDS?

BODY WORLDS • 200+ real human specimens• Specimens are Plastinated

Tissues replaced by polymer plastic through a vacuum process

Page 4: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Gunter von Hagens, 1995

Juan Valverde de Amusco, 1559

A Brief History of BODY WORLDS

Page 5: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

What is BODY WORLDS?What is BODY WORLDS?

ControversialControversial

Cultural/moral/ethical objections

Is it art or science, or both?

Risk of alienating our family visitors?

Page 6: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Were fears of Body Worlds’ inappropriateness for young children real or unfounded?

1. How well did adults predict the affective impact of Body Worlds on children?

– How accurately did children predict their own affective responses to Body Worlds?

– Overall, who was better at predicting child affective responses, adults or children?

The Research QuestionsThe Research Questions

Page 7: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

The Research DesignThe Research Design

Standard Pre/Post Design

172 families interviewed prior to entering

Adults and kids interviewed separately

150 families interviewed post-visit

Affective and cognitive questions (paired pre/post)

Page 8: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

6) How do you think you will react to seeing the exhibits? Not at all Extremely

Will you be curious? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be fascinated? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be uncomfortable?1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be interested? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be sad/upset? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you think a lot? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be confused? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be grossed out? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will you be bored? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Will it be creepy? 1 2 3 4 5 6

Measuring AffectMeasuring Affect

Page 9: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Analyzing Affect: Profile AnalysisAnalyzing Affect: Profile Analysis

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascinated

Uncomfortable

Interes

ted

Sad/Emotional

Confuse

d

Gross

ed out

Bored

Creep

y

Adult Self expectations

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascinated

Uncomfortable

Interes

ted

Sad/Emotional

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed o

ut Bored

Creepy

Adult Self expectations Adult expectations of Child

Step 1: Plot response means in a line graph

Step 2: Plot multiple groups to compare

Step 3: Analyzed differences for statistical significance.

Sign test (binomial) and/or t-test

Page 10: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Research Profile AnalysesResearch Profile Analyses

Comparisons made for the research:

1) Adult Expectations of Child vs. Child Expectations

2) Adult Expectations of Child vs. Child Outcomes

3) Child Expectations vs. Child Outcomes

Page 11: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

1: Adult Expectations of Child1: Adult Expectations of Child

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Adult expectations of Child

Page 12: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

1: Adult Expectations of Child vs. 1: Adult Expectations of Child vs. Child Self ExpectationsChild Self Expectations

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Adult expectations of Child Child Self expectations

Page 13: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

2: Adult Expectations of Child2: Adult Expectations of Child

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Adult expectations of Child

Page 14: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

2: Adult Expectations of Child vs. 2: Adult Expectations of Child vs. Child OutcomesChild Outcomes

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Adult expectations of Child Child Self outcomes

Page 15: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

3: Child Expectations3: Child Expectations

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Child Self expectations

Page 16: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

3: Child Expectations vs. 3: Child Expectations vs. Child OutcomesChild Outcomes

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Curious

Fascin

ated

Uncomfo

rtable

Inte

reste

d

Sad/E

motio

nal

Thou

ghtful

Confuse

d

Gro

ssed

out

Bore

d

Creep

y

Child Self expectations Child Self outcomes

Page 17: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

• While children were more bored than they expected to be, they were significantly less uncomfortable and emotional, and less confused, grossed out and afraid than adults anticipated.

• Children more reliably predicted how they would react to the exhibit than did adults.

• Overall, children were positive about the experience.

SummarySummary

Page 18: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

• Adult fears of the inappropriateness of BODY WORLDS for young children were unfounded.

ConclusionsConclusions

Page 19: Body Worlds presentation to JPL

Thank you!