Top Banner
1 Board of Regents, State of Iowa Executive Summary of Investment Performance Quarter Ending September 30, 2006
34

Board of Regents, State of Iowa

Jan 26, 2016

Download

Documents

Board of Regents, State of Iowa. Executive Summary of Investment Performance Quarter Ending September 30, 2006. Market Review. Market Observations. US Stock Market. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

1

Board of Regents, State of IowaExecutive Summary of Investment Performance

Quarter Ending September 30, 2006

Page 2: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

2

Market Observations US Stock Market

Market Review

After 17 consecutive ¼ point rate hikes, the Federal Reserve paused during the third quarter, leaving rates unchanged at 5.25%. During the second quarter, GDP growth slowed to 2.6% compared with growth of 5.6% in the first quarter. This rapid deceleration prompted concerns by some of a looming U.S. recession and contributed to the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady. Oil prices remained volatile during the quarter, reaching an all-time high near $78 per barrel in early August before selling off sharply to half-year lows near $60 as the quarter ended.

Inflation data was mixed during the quarter. Signs of slowing productivity in the second quarter coupled with rising labor costs created inflationary pressures. The annual change in Core CPI rose to 2.8% in August, up from 2.4% in May. Conversely, Core PPI painted a more benign inflationary picture with an annual change of 0.9%, down from 1.9% in June. The bond market’s long-term breakeven inflation forecast mirrored this sentiment. The spread between the 10-year TIPS and the 10-year nominal bond narrowed 27 basis points from 2.70% on August 8th, the day of the Fed’s first rate pause, to 2.43% at quarter’s end.

Job growth remained moderate with a monthly average of 128,000 jobs created from June through August. The unemployment rate stood at 4.7% in August. Finally, the housing market showed more signs of a significant slowdown, with housing starts off 6% in August, the 5th decline in 6 months.

After a nearly 2% sell-off in the second quarter, the U.S. equity market rebounded strongly during the 3rd quarter (DJW 5000 4.47%). Despite geopolitical uncertainty, some signs of rising core inflation, and a rapidly slowing housing market, equities rallied on the Fed’s decision to halt its 2-year rate tightening campaign. The previously mentioned pullback in oil prices also helped lift stock prices. As would be expected, interest sensitive stocks benefited from the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady, with the DJW REIT index up 9.1%, while lower oil prices triggered investors to take profits in energy stocks, bringing the Oil & Gas industry group down -2.8% in the quarter.

Large capitalization stocks outpaced smaller stocks during the quarter with the DJW Large Cap index up 5.26% versus sell-offs of -0.16% and -1.67% for the DJW Small and Micro Cap indexes, respectively. The relative strength of large caps drove their returns for the year above those of small caps (8.11% vs. 7.64%). Value stocks dominated growth stocks across the capitalization spectrum. The DJW Large Value index was up 7.19% compared to a 3.18% advance for the Large Growth index, while the Small Value index increased by 1.17% versus a decline of -1.59% for the DJW Small Growth index.

Telecom, Health Care, and Information Technology were the best performing sectors during the 3rd quarter. Materials, Industrials, and Energy were the only sectors to post negative returns; down -1.0%, -1.5%, and -3.6% respectively.

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Page 3: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

3

T-BILLCitigroup Non-US

Govt

Lehman Aggregate MSCI EAFE Index MSCI EMF Index

S&P 500

Wil. Real Estate Sec.

0

5

10

15

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Risk

Tot

al R

etur

n

Major Asset Class Returns (%)

Risk versus Return (9/30/96 - 9/30/06) Risk versus Return (9/30/86 – 9/30/96)

Capital Markets Review

QTR YTD 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 10yrEquity Dow Jones - Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 8.6 Standard and Poor's 500 5.7 8.5 10.8 12.3 7.0 8.6 International Stock (MSCI EAFE)(USD) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.8 Emerging Markets (MSCI EMF)(USD) 5.0 12.7 20.8 31.0 28.9 7.6 Dow Jones - Wilshire Real Estate Securities 9.1 24.6 28.3 27.8 23.2 16.0

Fixed Income Lehman Aggregate Bond 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 6.4 First Boston High Yield 3.5 7.2 7.8 9.1 11.3 7.1 International Bonds (Citigroup Non-US) 0.9 4.8 2.0 4.4 8.2 4.7 Treasury Bills (91 Day) 1.3 3.5 4.5 2.7 2.3 3.8

Consumer Price Index 0.0 3.1 2.1 3.1 2.6 2.5

MSCI EAFE Index

T-BILL

Citigroup Non-US Govt

Lehman Aggregate

S&P 500

Wil. Real Estate Sec.

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20

Risk

Tot

al R

etur

n

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Page 4: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

4

-45.0

-25.0

-5.0

15.0

35.0

55.0

12/96 6/97 12/97 6/98 12/98 6/99 12/99 6/00 12/00 6/01 12/01 6/02 12/02 6/03 12/03 6/04 12/04 6/05 12/05 6/06

10.2

8.0

7.1

7.1

5.7

5.6

-1.5

-3.6

-1.0

4.3

TelecommunicationServices

Health Care

InformationTechnology

Finance

Consumer Staples

Utilities

ConsumerDiscretionary

Materials

Industrials

Energy

QTR YTD 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 10yr

DJ Wilshire 4500 0.2 5.7 8.6 16.0 14.2 9.1DJ Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 8.6DJ Wilshire Real Est. Secs 9.1 24.6 28.3 27.8 23.2 16.0DJ Wilshire Large Cap 5.3 8.1 10.6 12.9 7.7 8.6DJ Wilshire Mid Cap 0.1 4.6 7.1 16.1 13.6 10.8DJ Wilshire Small Cap -0.2 7.6 9.4 16.6 15.6 10.3DJ Wilshire Micro Cap -1.7 4.8 5.5 13.2 21.1 13.3

DJ Wilshire Large Growth 3.2 2.8 6.0 9.9 5.5 6.3DJ Wilshire Large Value 7.2 13.2 15.0 15.7 10.0 10.5DJ Wilshire Mid Growth -0.9 2.7 6.9 17.0 14.0 7.1DJ Wilshire Mid Value 1.3 6.7 7.7 15.1 13.0 13.0DJ Wilshire Small Growth -1.6 4.8 7.4 15.6 14.1 6.4DJ Wilshire Small Value 1.2 10.4 11.3 17.5 16.9 13.4 -40.0

-20.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

12/96 6/97 12/97 6/98 12/98 6/99 12/99 6/00 12/00 6/01 12/01 6/02 12/02 6/03 12/03 6/04 12/04 6/05 12/05 6/06

US Equity Returns (%) Large Cap Vs. Small Cap

DJ Wilshire 5000 Sector Returns (%)Growth Stocks Vs. Value Stocks

Domestic Equity Markets

Growth Stocks

Value Stocks

Large Cap

Small Cap

Represents DJ Wilshire 5000 Quarterly Return(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Page 5: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

5

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0 10 20 30

Maturity (Years)

Yie

ld to

Mat

urit

y

CurrentLast Quarter1 Year Ago

US Fixed Income Returns (%) Treasury Yield Curve

Historical Yield Spread Comparison to Treasuries

Domestic Fixed Income Markets

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

12/96 12/99 12/02 12/05

Leh Mortgage Leh Long Agencies Leh AAA Long

Leh BAA Long FB High Y ield

Following the Fed decision to pause its Federal Funds rate tightening cycle during the 3rd quarter, trading on the 10-year Note has surprised many investors as its yield decreased by 52 basis points from 5.14% to 4.62%. Over the same time period the yield curve’s inversion has become more pronounced as the spread between the 10-year Note and the 91-day T-Bill closed the quarter at -0.12%. There is some debate about whether the Fed will be successful in managing a “soft landing” for the U.S. economy, as there is historical precedence for sustained periods of yield inversion leading to recession.

QTR YTD 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 10yr

Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 6.4

Lehman ABS 2.9 3.6 4.2 3.0 4.2 6.1

Lehman Credit 4.5 2.9 3.4 3.5 5.8 6.8

Lehman Gov't 3.5 2.6 3.3 2.8 4.3 6.2

Lehman Gov / Credit 3.9 2.7 3.3 3.1 5.0 6.5

Lehman Long Treasury 6.4 1.4 2.4 4.7 6.4 8.1

Lehman Mortgage 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.9 4.5 6.3

Lehman Agency 3.2 3.2 3.8 2.9 4.4 6.3

First Boston High Yield 3.5 7.2 7.8 9.1 11.3 7.1

Salomon Bros World Gov't Bond 1.4 4.2 2.2 4.1 7.3 5.3

Salomon Bros Non-US Bond 0.9 4.8 2.0 4.4 8.2 4.7Lehman US TIPS 3.6 1.8 1.9 4.9 7.3

Market Commentary

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Page 6: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

6

3.4

11.3

8.7

1.2

4.9

5.1

8.7

4.5

10.8

-6.2

7.2

12.2

6.9

7.4

4.2

5.6

2.6

6.3

-0.7

8.3

6.9

0.4

4.8

Austria

Belgium

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Ireland

Italy

Netherlands

Norway

Portugal

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

UK

Total Europe

Australia

Hong Kong

Japan

New Zealand

Singapore

Total Pacific

International Index Returns (%)

Market Commentary

MSCI EAFE IndexQuarterly Returns in USD

International Equity Markets

Equity (in U.S. $) QTR YTD 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 10yr

Non U.S. (ACWI X U.S) 4.0 14.3 19.4 23.9 16.4 7.6

Developed (EAFE) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.8

Emerging (EMF) 5.0 12.7 20.8 31.0 28.9 7.6

Europe 5.6 20.0 22.3 24.1 14.6 10.3

Pacific 0.4 4.0 12.9 18.5 13.6 1.7

France 4.9 21.7 22.5 24.7 14.3 11.2

Germany 4.8 18.9 24.2 25.9 14.2 8.0

Japan -0.7 1.2 13.2 16.8 11.0 0.4

United Kingdom 4.2 18.4 18.7 21.6 12.7 9.2

Currencies (% change)

Euro vs Dollar -0.9 7.4 5.1 2.8 6.8 --

Yen vs Dollar -3.2 0.0 -4.0 -1.8 0.2 -0.6

Pound vs Dollar 1.0 8.8 5.6 4.0 4.9 1.8

Country Weight

Austria 0.6

Belgium 1.2

Denmark 0.8

Finland 1.4

France 10.0

Germany 7.1

Greece 0.6

Ireland 0.8

Italy 3.9

Netherlands 3.5

Norway 0.8

Portugal 0.3

Spain 4.0

Sweden 2.4

Switzerland 7.1

UK 23.9

Total Europe 68.4

Australia 5.2

Hong Kong 1.7

Japan 23.6

New Zealand 0.2

Singapore 0.8

Total Pacific 31.6

Other Countries 0.0

The U.S. equity market was not alone during its summer rally as most of the non-U.S. equity market also charged ahead. Non-U.S. equities were led by Europe and the emerging markets which posted third quarter gains of 5.63% and 5.01%, respectively, in USD. The strengthening U.S. dollar had a hampering effect on the markets, particularly on Japanese equities where 3.18% was lost due to currency movement. Two main events slightly rattled some parts of the emerging markets: the military coup d’etat that took place in Thailand and the continued protests in Hungary which called for the resignation of Prime Minister Gyurcsany. The Thai baht declined by more than 1.3% against the dollar the day news broke of the coup while its local equity markets sustained a minor sell-off. But after the events settled, local markets gained some traction and the slippage in equity prices and the local currency were minimal.

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Page 7: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

7

247,099

231,767

9,389

5,943

Beginning Value

Cash Flow

Gains/Losses

Ending Value

Total Fund Results University of Iowa

3.97.3 9.0 10.8 7.7 9.97.4 9.4 11.1

8.0 10.24.1

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

1 Quarter YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Inception3/31/89

Ret

urn

(%)

Endow ment Policy Index

28.6

15.1

5.10.0

30.0

15.0

50

51.150.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

U.S. Equity Fixed Income Intl Equity Real Estate Cash

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Actual Policy

$'000s Actual P olicy

U.S. Equity 126,364 123,549

Fixed Income 70,765 74,130

Intl Equity 37,274 37,065

Real Estate 12,696 12,355

Cash 0 0

Total 247,099 247,099

Asset Allocation vs. Policy

Investment Performance

Quarter Results

($’000)

• The University of Iowa Endowment assets totaled $247.1 million at the close of the third quarter

• During the quarter, investment gains totaled $9.4 million

• Contributions totaled $6.4 million

• Distributions and fees totaled $0.4 million.

• The Endowment fund returned 3.85% for the third quarter, underperforming the benchmark by 0.29%.

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Page 8: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

8

-928

6,008

159,512

164,592

Beginning Value

Cash Flow

Gains/Losses

Ending Value

Total Fund Results Iowa State University

3.67.2 8.9 11.1 8.3 10.17.4 9.4 11.1 8.1 10.2

4.1

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

1 Quarter YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Inception3/31/89

Ret

urn

(%)

Total Fund Composite Policy Index

29.7

15.3

5.4

0.0

30.0

15.0

5.00

49.6 50.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

U.S. Equity Fixed Income Intl Equity Real Estate Cash

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Actual Policy

$'000s Actual P olicy

U.S. Equity 81,696 82,295

Fixed Income 48,922 49,378

Intl Equity 25,142 24,689

Real Estate 8,832 8,230

Cash 0 0

Total 164,592 164,592

Asset Allocation vs. Policy

Investment Performance

Quarter Results

($’000)

• The Iowa State Endowment assets totaled $164.6 million at the close of the third quarter

• During the quarter, investment gains totaled $6.0 million

• Total contributions were $0.3 million

• Total fees and distributions were $1.25 million

• The Endowment fund returned 3.64% for the third quarter, underperforming the benchmark by 0.50%

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Page 9: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

9

Total Fund Results

$'000 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception% % % % % %

Domestic Equity Composite (3/31/89) 126,364 4.0 7.1 9.0 12.5 6.8 11.4 Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 11.3

Fixed Income Composite (3/31/89) 70,765 3.5 3.4 3.9 3.5 4.5 7.5 Custom Policy* 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 7.6

Int'l Equity Composite (9/30/94) 37,274 4.4 14.9 20.4 23.1 17.5 8.0 MSCI EAFE (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.9

Real Estate Composite (12/31/05) 12,696 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7 NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Total Endowment (3/31/89) 247,099 3.9 7.3 9.0 10.8 7.7 9.9 Policy Index** 4.1 7.4 9.4 11.1 8.0 10.2

Iowa State

University of Iowa

** 6/89 -- 6/99 60% S&P 500 30% Lehman Govt / Credit 10% MSCI EAFE (n)9/99 -- 6/01 63% S&P 500 30% Lehman Govt / Credit 7% MSCI EAFE (n)9/01 -- 3/02 63% S&P 500 30% Lehman Aggregate 7% MSCI EAFE (n)3/02 -- 3/06 63% Wilshire 5000 30% Lehman Aggregate 7% MSCI EAFE (n)6/06 -- Present 50% Wilshire 5000 30% Lehman Aggregate 15% MSCI EAFE (n) 5% NCREIF Property Index

* 9/98 -- 6/01 100% Lehman Govt / Credit

9/01 -- Present 100% Lehman Aggregate

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

$'000 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception% % % % % %

Domestic Equity Composite (3/31/89) 81,696 3.6 6.6 8.4 12.5 6.7 11.2 Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 11.3

Fixed Composite (3/31/89) 48,922 3.5 3.5 3.9 3.6 4.5 6.9 Custom Policy* 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 7.6

Int'l Equity Composite (9/30/94) 25,142 4.4 14.9 20.4 22.7 16.8 7.7 MSCI EAFE (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.9

Real Estate Composite (12/31/05) 8,832 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7 NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Total Endowment (3/31/89) 164,592 3.6 7.2 8.9 11.1 8.3 10.1 Policy Index** 4.1 7.4 9.4 11.1 8.1 10.2

Page 10: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

10

2,788

3,359

92,982

86,835Beginning Value

Cash Flow

Gains/Losses

Ending Value

**Quasi Composite vs .Custom Policy

3.3 3.8 3.5 4.5 5.23.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 5.7

3.6 3.8

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

1 Quarter YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years Inception6/30/98

Ret

urn

(%)

Quasi Composite Custom Policy

Total Fund Results University of Iowa Quasi

100.0

0

100.0

00.0 0.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

U.S. Equity Fixed Income Cash

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Actual Policy

$'000s Actual P olicy

U.S. Equity 0 0

Fixed Income 92,982 92,982

Cash 0 0

Total 92,982 92,982

• The Quasi Endowment portfolio returned 3.62% during the third quarter, underperforming the benchmark by 0.19%

• The Quasi total fund has total assets of $93.0 million

• Total contributions totaled $4.0 million

• Total distributions and fees totaled $1.2 million

• The Quasi fund had investment gain of $3.4 million

Asset Allocation vs. Policy

Investment Performance

Quarter Results

($’000)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Page 11: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

11

Quasi Endowment Review

** 9/98 -- 6/01 100% Lehman Govt / Credit

9/01 -- Present 100% Lehman Aggregate

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

$'000 Investment Comp Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs InceptionFee $'000 % % % % % % %

Dodge & Cox (3/31/04) 48,712 55 52.4%Gross of Fee Return 3.5 3.8 4.4 -- -- 3.3Net of Fee Return 3.4 3.4 4.0 -- -- 2.9 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 -- -- 2.9

Reams Asset Management Quasi (9/30/01) 44,270 27 47.6%Gross of Fee Return 3.9 3.4 3.8 4.0 4.6 4.6Net of Fee Return 3.8 3.2 3.5 3.7 4.4 4.4 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 4.8

Quasi Composite (6/30/98) 92,982 82 100% 3.6 3.3 3.8 3.5 4.5 5.2 Custom Policy** 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 5.7

Page 12: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

12

Domestic Equity Composite Review

University of Iowa $'000 Investment Comp Qtr YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years InceptionFee $'000 % % % % % % %

Goldman Sachs Large Cap (3/31/05) 51,805 0 41.0%Gross of Fee Return 5.8 9.6 13.0 -- -- 13.4Net of Fee Return 5.8 9.3 12.6 -- -- 13.0 S&P 500 5.7 8.5 10.8 -- -- 10.6

Lotsoff Large Cap Equity (3/31/05) 50,953 41 40.3%Gross of Fee Return 4.7 7.0 9.0 -- -- 11.3Net of Fee Return 4.6 6.7 8.6 -- -- 10.9 S&P 500 5.7 8.5 10.8 -- -- 10.6

LSV Asset Mgm't (6/30/02) 11,993 21 9.5%Gross of Fee Return -0.5 5.4 5.0 16.5 -- 12.0Net of Fee Return -0.7 4.8 4.3 15.7 -- 11.4 Russell 2500 Value 2.3 10.1 11.1 18.9 -- 14.8

Artisan Small Cap Growth (3/31/05) 11,613 33 9.2%Gross of Fee Return -1.1 1.9 2.0 -- -- 9.9Net of Fee Return -1.4 1.0 0.9 -- -- 8.8 Russell 2000 Growth -1.8 4.2 5.9 -- -- 10.7

Domestic Equity Composite (3/31/89) 126,364 95 100.0% 4.0 7.1 9.0 12.5 6.8 11.4 Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 11.3

Manager Returns – Iowa State University

Manager Returns – University of Iowa

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Iowa State University $'000 Investment Comp Qtr YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years InceptionFee $'000 % % % % % % %

Goldman Sachs Large Cap (3/31/05) 32,377 34 39.6%Gross of Fee Return 5.4 8.6 11.9 -- -- 12.9Net of Fee Return 5.3 8.3 11.5 -- -- 12.4 S&P 500 5.7 8.5 10.8 -- -- 10.6

Lotsoff Large Cap Equity (3/31/05) 31,865 28 39.0%Gross of Fee Return 4.6 7.0 9.0 -- -- 11.3Net of Fee Return 4.5 6.7 8.6 -- -- 10.9 S&P 500 5.7 8.5 10.8 -- -- 10.6

LSV Asset Mgm't (6/30/02) 8,583 15 10.5%Gross of Fee Return -0.7 5.9 5.0 17.1 -- 12.5Net of Fee Return -0.9 5.4 4.2 16.3 -- 11.8 Russell 2500 Value 2.3 10.1 11.1 18.9 -- 14.8

Artisan Small Cap Growth (3/31/05) 8,871 25 11%Gross of Fee Return -1.1 1.9 2.0 -- -- 9.7Net of Fee Return -1.4 1.1 0.9 -- -- 8.7 Russell 2000 Growth -1.8 4.2 5.9 -- -- 10.7

Domestic Equity Composite (3/31/89) 81,696 102 100.0% 3.6 6.6 8.4 12.5 6.7 11.2 Wilshire 5000 4.5 8.0 10.4 13.3 8.6 11.3

Page 13: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

13

Domestic Equity Composite Review

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

-170

-145

-120

-95

-70

-45

-20

5

30

55

80

105

130

155

-150 -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150

Value/Growth

Siz

e

Domestic Equity Comp

Goldman

Lotsoff

LSV

S&P 500

Russell 2000 Growth

Russell 2500 Value

Wilshire 5000

Artisan

Page 14: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

14

Domestic Equity Review – Goldman Sachs

10.812.6

5.8

13.0

9.3

5.7

10.6

8.5

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Goldman Sachs S&P 500

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. S&P 500)

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. S&P 500)

Attribution

• Stock selection within the Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Industrial sectors added value to the portfolio during the third quarter

• Stock selection within the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors detracted from the value of the portfolio

• The disparity between the two portfolio’s returns can be attributed to the timing of the University of Iowa’s cash flow into its Goldman Sach’s portfolio

Manager Overview

• Style: Large Capitalization Core Equity

• Construction Process: Optimization

• Investment Philosophy: Enhanced Index

• Selection Method: Quantitative valuation

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

10.8

8.3

12.4

5.3

11.5

8.5

10.6

5.7

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Goldman Sachs S&P 500

Page 15: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

15

Domestic Equity Review – Lotsoff

10.8

6.7

10.9

4.6

8.68.5

10.6

5.7

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Lotsoff S&P 500

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. S&P 500)

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. S&P 500)

Attribution

• Stock selection within the Information Technology and Consumer discretionary added value to the portfolio

• Poor stock selection within the Energy and Industrials sectors was a primary source of underperformance for the third quarter

• An underweight to the Telecom Services sector detracted from performance for the quarter

Manager Overview

• Style: Large Capitalization Core Equity

• Construction Process: Optimization

• Investment Philosophy: Active Bottom Up

• Selection Method: Quantitative valuation

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

10.8

6.7

10.9

4.5

8.68.5

10.6

5.7

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Lotsoff S&P 500

Page 16: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

16

Domestic Equity Review – LSV Asset Mgmt.

11.14.8

15.7

0.7-

11.35

4.310.1

18.9

2.3

14.8

-25.0

-15.0

-5.0

5.0

15.0

25.0

35.0

45.0

55.0

65.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years Inception 6/30/02

Per

cen

tage

LSV Russell 2500 Value

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. Russell 2500 Value)

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. Russell 2500 Value)

Attribution

• Stock selection was the primary driver of LSV’s underperformance this quarter

• Stock selection within the Information Technology, Industrials, and Financial sectors were main contributors to LSV’s underperformance for the quarter

• Stock selection within the Consumer Discretionary sector added value to the portfolio

Manager Overview

• Style: Mid Capitalization Value Equity

• Construction Process: Optimization

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Quantitative valuation

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

11.15.4

16.3

0.9-

11.84.2

10.1

18.9

2.3

14.8

-25.0

-15.0

-5.0

5.0

15.0

25.0

35.0

45.0

55.0

65.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years Inception 6/30/02

Per

cen

tage

LSV Russell 2500 Value

Page 17: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

17

Domestic Equity Review – Artisan

5.9

1.0

8.8

1.4-

0.94.2

10.7

1.8-

-35.0

-25.0

-15.0

-5.0

5.0

15.0

25.0

35.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Artisan Russell 2000 Growth

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. Russell 2000 Growth)

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. Russell 2000 Growth)

Attribution

• Stock selection within the Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials sectors were the main contributors to Artisan’s out performance for the quarter

• Stock selection within the Energy sector had a negative impact on performance

Manager Overview

• Style: Small Capitalization Growth Equity

• Construction Process: Optimization

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Fundamental valuation

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

5.9

1.1

8.7

1.4-

0.94.2

10.7

1.8-

-35.0

-25.0

-15.0

-5.0

5.0

15.0

25.0

35.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cent

age

Artisan Russell 2000 Growth

Page 18: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

18

International Equity Composite Review

University of Iowa $'000 Investment Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception

Fee $'000 % % % % % %

Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo Foreign Fund (3/31/04) 37,274 76Gross of Fee Return 4.7 15.6 21.4 -- -- 19.0Net of Fee Return 4.4 14.9 20.4 -- -- 18.2 MSCI EAFE Index (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 -- -- 17.5

Int'l Equity Composite (9/30/94) 37,274 76 4.4 14.9 20.4 23.1 17.5 8.0 MSCI EAFE Index (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.9

Iowa State University $'000 Investment Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception

Fee $'000 % % % % % %

Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo Foreign Fund (3/31/04) 25,142 52Gross of Fee Return 4.7 15.6 21.4 -- -- 19.0Net of Fee Return 4.4 14.9 20.4 -- -- 18.2 MSCI EAFE Index (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 -- -- 17.5

Int'l Equity Composite (9/30/94) 25,142 52 4.4 14.9 20.4 22.7 16.8 7.7 MSCI EAFE Index (N) 3.9 14.5 19.2 22.3 14.3 6.9

19.220.417.5

8.04.4

23.1

14.9 14.3

6.93.9

22.3

14.5

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years Five Years Inception 9/30/94

Per

cent

age

Int'l Equity Comp MSCI EAFE (N)

University of Iowa -- Manager Returns Iowa State University -- Manager Returns

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. MSCI EAFE (N))

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. MSCI EAFE (N))

19.214.9

22.7

4.47.7

16.820.4

14.5

22.3

3.96.9

14.3

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years Five Years Inception 9/30/94

Per

cent

age

Int'l Equity Comp MSCI EAFE (N)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Page 19: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

19

International Equity Review – Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo

19.214.9

18.2

4.4

20.4

14.517.5

3.9

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Inception

Per

cen

tage

GMO MSCI EAFE (N)

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

Attribution

• GMO outperformed the benchmark by 0.51% in the third quarter

• Sector weighting and stock selection within the United Kingdom was a primary driver of out performance for the quarter

• An overweighting to the Swiss markets detracted from overall performance

Manager Overview

• Style: International Value Equity

• Construction Process: Valuation measures

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Fundamental Earnings Forecast

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

19.214.9

18.2

4.4

20.4

14.517.5

3.9

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Last Quarter Year to Date One Year Inception

Per

cen

tage

GMO MSCI EAFE (N)

Page 20: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

20

Fixed Income Composite Review

Iowa State University $'000 Investment Comp Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs InceptionFee $'000 % % % % % % %

Dodge & Cox Income Fund (3/31/04) 20,514 22 41.9%Gross of Fee Return 3.5 3.7 4.4 -- -- 3.3Net of Fee Return 3.4 3.4 4.0 -- -- 2.9 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 -- -- 2.9

Reams Asset Mgm't (6/30/02) 19,854 15 40.6%Gross of Fee Return 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.1 -- 4.4Net of Fee Return 3.8 3.4 3.6 3.8 -- 4.0 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 -- 3.9

Post Advisory (3/31/06) 8,554 0 17.5%Gross of Fee Return 2.8 -- -- -- -- 3.3Net of Fee Return 2.8 -- -- -- -- 3.2 Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II 4.0 -- -- -- -- 4.2

Fixed Income Composite (3/31/89) 48,922 37 100% 3.5 3.5 3.9 3.6 4.5 6.9 Custom Policy** 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 7.6

** 6/94 -- 6/01 100% Lehman Govt / Credit 9/01 -- Present 100% Lehman Aggregate

** 6/94 -- 6/01 100% Lehman Govt / Credit 9/01 -- Present 100% Lehman Aggregate

University of Iowa $'000 Investment Comp Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception

Fee $'000 % % % % % % %

Dodge & Cox Income Fund (3/31/04) 28,736 32 40.6%Gross of Fee Return 3.6 3.7 4.4 -- -- 3.3Net of Fee Return 3.4 3.4 4.0 -- -- 2.9 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 -- -- 2.9

Reams Asset Mgm't (6/30/02) 29,077 18 41.1%Gross of Fee Return 3.9 3.4 3.8 4.0 -- 4.2Net of Fee Return 3.8 3.2 3.5 3.7 -- 4.0 Lehman Aggregate 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 -- 3.9

Post Advisory (3/31/06) 12,952 0 18.3%Gross of Fee Return 2.8 -- -- -- -- 3.3

Net of Fee Return 2.8 -- -- -- -- 3.3 Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II 4.0 -- -- -- -- 4.2

Fixed Income Composite (3/31/89) 70,765 50 100% 3.5 3.4 3.9 3.5 4.5 7.5 Custom Policy** 3.8 3.1 3.7 3.4 4.8 7.6

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, slight adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

Page 21: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

21

Fixed Income Review – Dodge and Cox

3.73.4

2.9

3.4

4.0

3.1 2.9

3.8

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Last Quarter Year to Date One Year Inception 3/31/04

Per

cen

tage

Dodge & Cox Lehman Aggregate

Attribution

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. Lehman Aggregate)

• Dodge & Cox underperformed the benchmark by 0.38% in the third quarter

• The quality of bonds within the portfolio is AA, matching the Lehman Aggregate’s average quality

• The portfolio has a duration of 3.8 years, versus the Lehman Aggregate’s duration of 4.6 years

• Style: Market Core

• Construction Process: Build Portfolios with Higher Yield than Market Portfolio

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Quantitative and Qualitative valuation

Manager Overview

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. Lehman Aggregate)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

3.74.0

3.42.9

3.43.8

2.93.1

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Last Quarter Year to Date One Year Inception 3/31/04

Per

cen

tage

Dodge & Cox Lehman Aggregate

Page 22: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

22

Fixed Income Review - Reams

3.73.53.8 4.0

3.2

3.8 3.9

3.1

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years

Per

cent

age

Reams Lehman Aggregate

Attribution

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. Lehman Aggregate)

• Reams’ return was slightly lower than the benchmark by 0.01% in the third quarter.

• The average quality of bonds within the portfolio is AA, compared to Lehman Aggregate’s AA rating

• The portfolio has a duration of 4.8 years, versus the Lehman Aggregate’s duration of 4.6 years.

• Style: Market Core

• Construction Process: Optimization

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Quantitative and Qualitative valuation

Manager Overview

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. Lehman Aggregate)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

3.73.63.8 4.0

3.43.8 3.9

3.1

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Last Quarter YTD One Year Three Years

Per

cent

age

Reams Lehman Aggregate

Page 23: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

23

Fixed Income Review – Post Advisory

2.8

4.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Last Q uarter

Per

cent

age

Post High Yield ML High Yield Master II

Attribution

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. ML High Yield Master II)

• Post Advisory underperformed its benchmark by 1.21% in the third quarter

• The average quality of bonds within the portfolio is B, a slightly lower rating than the Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II’s rating of BB

• The portfolio has a duration of 3.79 years, versus the benchmark duration of 4.66 years.

• Style: High Yield

• Construction Process: Subjective

• Investment Philosophy: Active - Bottom up

• Selection Method: Scoring model based on quantitative and quantitative inputs

Manager Overview

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. ML High Yield Master II)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

2.8

4.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Last Q uarter

Per

cent

age

Post High Yield ML High Yield Master II

Page 24: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

24

Real Estate Composite Review

Iowa State University $'000 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception

% % % % % %

Prinicipal Global Investors Enhanced Property Fund (12/31/05) 8,832 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Real Estate Composite (12/31/05) 8,832 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Note: At the direction of the Board of Regents, adjustments have been made to composite market values to account for rounding

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

University of Iowa $'000 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Inception

% % % % % %

Prinicipal Global Investors Enhanced Property Fund (12/31/05) 12,696 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Real Estate Composite (12/31/05) 12,696 3.1 15.7 -- -- -- 15.7NCREIF Property Index 3.5 11.6 -- -- -- 11.6

Page 25: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

25

Real Estate Review – Principal Global Investors

11.6

15.7

3.1

15.7

11.6

3.5

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Last Quarter YTD Inception 12/31/05

Per

cen

tage

Prinicpal NCREIF

Commentary

University of Iowa -- Value Added (Vs. NCREIF Property Index)

• Style: U.S. Domestic Real Estate

• Investment Philosophy: Active – Top Down

• Selection Method: Tactical - Opportunistic

Manager Overview

Iowa State University -- Value Added (Vs. NCREIF Property Index)

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

11.6

15.7

3.1

15.7

11.6

3.5

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Last Quarter YTD Inception 12/31/05

Per

cen

tage

Prinicpal NCREIF

• Operating income during the third quarter was below Principal’s business plan due to less than anticipated office and retail demand

• Overall occupancy remains consistent and high at 93%

• Underperformance can be partially attributed to an overweight of development properties relative to the NCREIF Property Index

Page 26: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

Appendix

Page 27: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

27

Domestic Equity Manager Detail – Goldman Sachs

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

-5

0

5

10

15

Quarter Year-to-date One Year

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

1.08

2.70

4.06

5.28

6.38

-0.03

2.72

5.32

8.28

10.28

3.60

6.22

8.45

10.68

12.95

Universe: Wilshire Large CorePercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year Goldman Sachs - Iowa 5.29 (25) 8.30 (24) 11.48 (19)Goldman Sachs - Univ 5.76 (17) 9.29 (13) 12.55 (13)S&P500 Official 5.67 (19) 8.53 (21) 10.79 (23)# of Products 249 249 249

Page 28: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

28

Domestic Equity Manager Detail – Lotsoff

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

-5

0

5

10

15

Quarter Year-to-date One Year

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

1.08

2.70

4.06

5.28

6.38

-0.03

2.72

5.32

8.28

10.28

3.60

6.22

8.45

10.68

12.95

Universe: Wilshire Large CorePercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year Lotsoff Capital - Io 4.51 (42) 6.74 (37) 8.63 (46)Lotsoff Capital - Un 4.59 (41) 6.70 (37) 8.60 (47)S&P500 Official 5.67 (19) 8.53 (21) 10.79 (23)# of Products 249 249 249

Page 29: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

29

Domestic Equity Manager Detail – LSV

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Quarter Year-to-date One Year Three Years 06/2002-09/2006

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

0.81

1.72

3.46

4.70

5.825.86

6.73

8.36

10.95

12.30

6.99

7.47

9.13

12.36

14.33

11.90

15.00

17.20

20.76

25.48

9.84

12.14

14.69

16.88

18.74

Universe: Wilshire Mid ValuePercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year Three Years 06/02-09/06 Lsv Asset Management -0.86 (99) 5.36 (92) 4.24(100) 16.29 (65) 11.82 (76)Lsv Asset Management -0.72 (98) 4.84 (93) 4.28 (99) 15.65 (68) 11.35 (79)Russell 2500 Val 2.27 (60) 10.12 (36) 11.14 (32) 18.86 (41) 14.81 (49)# of Products 22 22 22 22 21

Page 30: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

30

Domestic Equity Manager Detail – Artisan

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Quarter Year-to-date One Year

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

-4.53

-3.34

-1.63

0.42

1.47

-0.64

1.52

3.08

6.24

9.30

1.00

3.36

5.73

9.05

11.72

Universe: Wilshire Small Grow thPercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year Artisan Partners - I -1.41 (49) 1.05 (78) 0.86 (90)Artisan Partners - U -1.41 (49) 1.03 (79) 0.94 (90)Russell 2000 Gro -1.75 (54) 4.22 (37) 5.89 (48)# of Products 112 112 112

Page 31: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

31

International Equity Manager Detail – Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

13.00

14.00

15.00

16.00

17.00

18.00

19.00

20.00

21.00

22.00

23.00

24.00

25.00

26.00

27.00

28.00

29.00

Quarter Year-to-date One Year 03/2004-09/2006

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

1.45

2.54

3.69

4.68

5.85

9.06

12.12

14.60

16.54

18.89

14.60

17.41

19.69

22.05

24.52

15.22

16.70

18.89

21.53

24.71

Universe: Wilshire EAFEPercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year 03/04-09/06 Gmo - Iowa State 4.44 (31) 14.92 (44) 20.39 (41) 18.16 (58)Gmo - University Of 4.44 (31) 14.92 (44) 20.41 (41) 18.17 (58)Msci Eafe $n 3.93 (45) 14.48 (51) 19.16 (58) 17.54 (66)# of Products 279 279 279 272

Page 32: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

32

Fixed Income Manager Detail – Dodge & Cox

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

2.00

2.10

2.20

2.30

2.40

2.50

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

4.10

4.20

4.30

4.40

4.50

4.60

4.70

4.80

4.90

5.00

5.10

5.20

5.30

5.40

5.50

Quarter Year-to-date One Year 03/2004-09/2006

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

3.22

3.51

3.78

3.92

4.05

2.82

3.05

3.25

3.48

3.85

3.51

3.69

3.91

4.16

4.57

2.48

2.83

3.14

3.46

3.84

Universe: Wilshire Market CorePercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year 03/04-09/06 Dodge And Cox - Iowa 3.43 (79) 3.41 (31) 3.98 (43) 2.93 (68)Dodge And Cox - Univ 3.43 (79) 3.38 (33) 3.96 (44) 2.90 (70)Lb Aggregate 3.81 (47) 3.06 (74) 3.67 (77) 2.86 (73)# of Products 362 362 362 359

Page 33: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

33

Fixed Income Manager Detail – Reams

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

2.00

2.20

2.40

2.60

2.80

3.00

3.20

3.40

3.60

3.80

4.00

4.20

4.40

4.60

4.80

5.00

5.20

5.40

5.60

5.80

6.00

6.20

6.40

6.60

6.80

Quarter Year-to-date One Year 09/2002-09/2006

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriods as of September 30, 2006Periods as of September 30, 2006

3.22

3.51

3.78

3.92

4.05

2.82

3.05

3.25

3.48

3.85

3.51

3.69

3.91

4.16

4.57

3.50

3.89

4.34

5.11

5.99

Universe: Wilshire Market CorePercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter YTD One Year 09/02-09/06 Reams Asset Manageme 3.80 (48) 3.37 (33) 3.57 (85) 4.04 (64)Reams Asset Mgmt - U 3.82 (46) 3.16 (63) 3.52 (90) 3.96 (71)Lb Aggregate 3.81 (47) 3.06 (74) 3.67 (77) 3.88 (76)# of Products 362 362 362 349

Page 34: Board of Regents, State of Iowa

34

Fixed Income Manager Detail – Post Advisory

(Periods Ending September 30, 2006)

2.00

2.10

2.20

2.30

2.40

2.50

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

4.10

4.20

4.30

4.40

4.50

4.60

4.70

4.80

4.90

5.00

Quarter

An

nu

aliz

ed T

ota

l R

etu

rn (

Qu

arte

rly

Ret

urn

s)

Universe AnalysisUniverse AnalysisPeriod as of September 30, 2006Period as of September 30, 2006

2.64

3.17

3.58

3.83

4.12

Universe: Wilshire High YieldPercentiles: 10, 25, 50, 75, 90

Quarter Post High Yield - Is 2.82 (86)Post High Yield - U 2.82 (86)Ml Hy Master Ii 4.03 (12)# of Products 98