Top Banner
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Frances Perkins, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Isador Lubin, Commissioner (on leave) A. F. Hinrichs, Acting Commissioner in cooperation with WORK PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION + Building Permit Survey 1939 VOLUME V South Atlantic Cities + Prepared by the DIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT HERMAN B, BYER, Chief Bulletin T^o. 689 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - Price 15 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
85
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABORFrances Perkins, Secretary

B U R E A U OF L ABO R STATISTICSIsador Lubin, Commissioner (on leave)A . F. Hinrichs, Acting Commissioner

in cooperation w ithW O R K PROJECTS A D M IN IST R A T IO N

+

Building Permit Survey 1939

VOLUME V South Atlantic Cities

+

Prepared by theDIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION AND

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT H E R M A N B, BYER, Chief

B ulletin T^o. 689

UN ITED STATES

G O V E R N M E N T PRINTING OFFICE

W ASH IN G TO N : 1942

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D . C. - Price 15 cents

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 2: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

U NITED STATES D E PARTM EN T OF LABORF rances Perk in s , Secretary

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Isador Ltjbin, Com m issioner (on leave)

A. F. Hinrichs, Acting Com m issioner

+

Donald Davenport, Chief, Employ­ment and Occupational Outlook Branch

Henry J. Fitzgerald, Chief, Business Management Branch

Ary ness Joy, Chief, Prices and Cost of Living Branch

N. Arnold Tolies, Chief, Working Conditions and Industrial Relations Branch

Hugh S. Hanna, Chief, Editorial and Sidney W. Wilcox, Chief Statistician Research

CH IEFS OF D IV ISIO N

Herman B. Byer, Construction and Public Employment

J. M. Cutts, Wholesale Prices W. Duane Evans, Productivity and

Technological Developments Swen Kjaer, Industrial Accidents John J. Mahaney, Machine Tabulation Robert J. Myers, Wage and Hour

StatisticsFlorence Peterson, Industrial Relations

Charles F. Sharkey, Labor Law Infor­mation

Boris Stern, Labor Information ServiceStella Stewart, Retail PricesLewis E. Talbert, Employment Sta­

tisticsEmmett H. Welch, Occupational Out­

look

Faith M. Williams, Cost of Living

+

ii

BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY

Abbee W. Talamo, Director

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 3: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

CONTENTS

PageS u m m a r y ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1R e s id e n t ia l c o n s t r u c t io n :

U nits added, converted , an d dem olish ed______________________________________ 3P rivately financed residential construction :

T y p e of stru ctu re_____________________________________________________________ 6E xterior construction m ateria l____________________________________________ 8P erm it v a lu a tio n s_____________________________________________________________ 11R oom s per dw elling u n it____________________________________________________ 17D em o litio n s____________________________________________________________________ 22

H ou sin g projects financed from Federal fu n d s______________________________ 23N onh ousekeepin g residential construction :

T y p e of stru ctu re an d perm it v a lu ation s_______________________________ 25D em o litio n s____________________________________________________________________ 31

N o n r e s id e n t ia l c o n s t r u c t io n :T y p e of structure an d perm it va lu ation s_____________________________________ 32D em o litio n s__________________________________________________________________________ 40

A p p e n d i x :T a b l e A .— -N u m ber and perm it va lu ation of nonhousekeeping resi­

dential and nonresidential structures for w hich building perm its w ere issued in Sou th A tla n tic cities, b y typ e of structure an d specified m aterials, 1 9 3 9 ____________________ 43

TablesT a b l e 1.— N u m b er of new fam ily -d w ellin g units p rovided , units added

and elim inated b y additions and alterations, and units de­m olished, in Sou th A tla n tic cities, 1939 and 1 9 3 8 ________________ 4

2 . — N u m b er of fam ily -d w ellin g units in p rivate ly financed struc­tures for w hich building perm its were issued in Sou th A tla n tic cities, b y ty p e of structure, 1 9 3 9 _____________________________________ 7

3 . — N u m b er of fam ily -d w ellin g units in p rivate ly financed struc­tures for w hich building perm its w ere issued in Sou th A tla n tic cities, b y ty p e of structure and specified m aterials, 1 9 3 9 _____ 9

4 . — N u m b er of fam ily -d w ellin g units in p rivate ly financed struc­tures for w hich building perm its were issued in 41 South A tla n tic cities, b y perm it va lu ation per unit and typ e of structrue, 1 9 3 9 ___________________________________________________________ 13

5 . — N u m b er of p rivate ly financed 1 -fam ily dw ellings w ith ou t com ­m ercial space for w hich building perm its were issued in Sou th A tla n tic cities, b y perm it va lu ation , 1 9 3 9 _______________ 15

6 . — N u m b e r of room s per fa m ily -d w ellin g unit in p rivate ly financedstructures for w hich building perm its were issued in 34 South A tla n tic cities, b y ty p e of structure, 1 9 3 9 ________________________ 18

in

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 4: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

IV CONTENTS

T a b l e 7 .— Number of rooms contained in priv&tely financed 1-family dwellings without commercial space for which building per­mits were issued in 34 South Atlantic cities, 1939____ ________ 20

8. — Number of family-dwelling units in structures for which demo­lition permits were issued in 29 South Atlantic cities, by type of structure, 1939____________________________________________ 22

9. — United States Housing Authority projects in 20 South Atlanticcities, 1939___________________________________________________ 26

10. —-Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residentialstructures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure, 1939 and 1938_________ 28

11. —Number of nonhousekeeping residential structures for whichdemolition permits were issued in 9 South Atlantic cities,1939__________________________________________________________ 31

12. — Number and permit valuation of nonresidential structures forwhich building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure, 1939 and 1938_________________________ 34

13. — Number of nonresidential structures for which demolitionpermits were issued in 30 South Atlantic cities, 1939__________ 41

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 5: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Letter o f Transmittal

U nited States D epartment of L abor ,B ureau of L abor Statistics,

Washington, D. C., June 20, 1941.The Secretary of L abor :

I have the honor to transmit herewith the fifth of a series of nine reports on residential and nonresidential construction and dem­olition. This report covers 41 cities in the South Atlantic States. An explanation of the purposes of the survey was given in the preface to the first report, which covered the New England cities.

A. F. H inrichs,Acting Commissioner.

Hon. F rances Per k in s ,Secretary oj Labor.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 6: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 7: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

B ulletin !No. 689 (Voi. V) o f the U nited States Bureau o f Labor Statistics

Building Permit Survey, 1939

Residential and Nonresidential Construction and Demolition, South Atlantic Cities, 1939 1 2

SummaryThe Bureau of Labor Statistics has secured summary figures on

building construction in the principal cities of the country annually since 1921 and monthly since September 1929. These figures are pub­lished in the monthly report Building Construction and in annual summaries. In response to the demand for more detailed information on building construction than that available from the monthly sum­mary figures, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with the Work Projects Administration, made an intensive survey of building- permit data for the period since 1929 in cities with a population of10,000 and over. This bulletin, covering South Atlantic cities for the year 1939, is the fifth of a series for each of the 9 geographic divisions of the United States. The years 1929 to 1935 and 1936 to 1938 are covered in earlier bulletins.

Building permits were issued in 41 South Atlantic cities 3 with a population of 25,000 and over for new privately financed residential structures containing 21,923 family-dwelling units in 1939. In addition, housing facilities were provided for 12,000 families in United States Housing Authority projects in 20 of the cities, making a total of 33,923 new units. Furthermore, a large volume of construc­tion was authorized in 1939 for nonhousekeeping residential and nonresidential construction. Valuations for nonhousekeeping resi­dential building amounted to $3,269,000 and for nonresidential

1 A n a l y s i s a n d p r e s e n t a t io n b y L y n n K . F i n n e g a n . P l a n n in g o f t h e t a b le s b y H e n r y F . H a a s e , A s s i s t a n t

D i r e c t o r o f t h e S u r v e y ; t a b u l a t i o n o f t h e d a t a u n d e r t h e s u p e r v i s i o n o f J o s e p h H . F e in g o ld , R e g io n a l

S u p e r v i s o r , R e g io n I .

2 S u c h d is c r e p a n c ie s a s a p p e a r b e t w e e n t h e f ig u r e s i n t h i s b u l l e t i n a n d t h o s e p r e s e n t e d i n m o n t h ly r e p o r t s

p r e v io u s l y r e le a s e d b y t h e B u r e a u o f L a b o r S t a t i s t i c s a r i s e f r o m v a r y i n g c a u s e s . I n s o m e c a s e s e a r l y

r e c o r d s w e r e in c o m p le t e a t t h e t im e t h e p r e s e n t s u r v e y w a s m a d e . I n o t h e r c a s e s d i f f e r e n c e s r e s u l t f r o m t h e

f a c t t h a t m o r e a c c u r a t e i n t e r p r e t a t io n w a s p o s s ib le o n t h e b a s is o f t h e d e t a i le d in f o r m a t io n c o l le c t e d b y

t h e a g e n ts o f t h e B u i l d i n g P e r m i t S u r v e y . I n s o m e in s t a n c e s b u i ld in g s a re n o t e re c te d o r d e m o l is h e d

a f t e r t h e p e r m i t i s i s s u e d . T h e B u r e a u m a k e s n o a t t e m p t to c o l le c t s u c h i n f o r m a t io n i n o r d e r to a d ju s t

t h e f ig u r e s .

3 T h e U . S . C e n s u s o f P o p u la t i o n fo r 1930 w a s u s e d to d e t e r m in e t h e s iz e o f t h e c i t i e s . I n 193 0 , t h e S o u t h

A t l a n t i c D i v i s i o n h a d 41 c i t i e s w i t h a p o p u la t io n o f 2 5 ,0 0 0 o r m o r e .

1

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 8: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

2 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

construction to $76,064,000. Half of this latter total was reported in Washington, D. C;

The South Atlantic States constitute a rapidly growing region with an increasing demand for housing and nonresidential facilities. The increase in population during the 1930-40 decade was exceeded only by that in the Pacific region. Among cities in the United States with populations of 100,000 and over, Miami, Fla., was first and Washing­ton, D. C., was third, with respect to population gains during the 10 years. The growth in Washington was largely accelerated by in­creased employment in the Federal Government. Jacksonville, Or­lando, St. Petersburg, and West Palm Beach, Fla.; Columbus, Ga.; and Raleigh, N. C.; all showed substantial gains, and Charlotte, N. C., increased from 82,675 in 1930 to 100,899 in 1940. The migration of the textile industry to the South and the expansion of other activities, such as the tobacco industry, were among factors contributing to the growing population.

For privately financed residential building in the 41 cities during 1939, the single-family house was the favored type of structure except in Wilmington, Del., where units in apartment buildings predomi­nated, and Washington, D. C., where units in 1-family houses and in 5- or-more-family structures were about equal in number. A large pro­portion of the single-family houses were detached structures but row houses were important in a few cities, notably Washington and Baltimore. Frame and brick were the exterior construction materials which were used most extensively. Three-fifths of the new units had valuations ranging from $2,000 to $4,500 per unit. More than three-fifths of the family-dwelling units for which data were available had 5 or 6 rooms.

The single-family attached house predominated in Federally financed construction. Brick was the most important type of exterior construction material although concrete was specified for a number of the projects, especially those in the Florida cities. Forty five percent of the units in the housing developments had five rooms.

On the basis of dollar volume, dormitories were the most important type of nonhousekeeping residential structure. Public buildings, in­stitutions, schools, and stores and other mercantile buildings, made up the bulk of nonresidential construction.

In addition to permits issued for private construction, the tables include the value of contracts awarded for Federal, State, and munici­pal buildings in the cities covered by this report. The data concerning Federal and State buildings are collected by the Bureau from the various Federal and State agencies which have the power to award contracts for building construction.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 9: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Residential ConstructionUnits Added, Converted, and Demolished

Building permits issued in the 41 South Atlantic cities indicate that more new family-dwelling units were provided in new buildings in 1939 than in 1938. Permits were issued for 21,923 new units in privately financed residential buildings in 1939 as compared with 18,128 in1938—an increase of about one-fifth.

Approximately one-half of the 21,923 new accommodations reported in 1939 were concentrated in 3 cities: Washington, D. C., with 6,178, the greatest number of new privately financed units; Miami, Fla., with 2,639; and Baltimore, Md., with 2,284.

In addition to the privately financed residential facilities, 12,000 units were authorized in projects of the United States Housing- Authority, while only 251 accommodations in Federal housing develop­ments were reported in 1938. These projects were planned to pro­vide healthful, sanitary homes for low-income families and in many cases were to take the place of slum dwellings.

It is impossible to ascertain the net increase in housing in the 41 cities as data concerning additions and alterations to existing struc­tures and private wrecking operations are not available in several of the cities. Available information indicates, however, that additions and alterations resulted in 1,409 family-dwelling units in 39 cities; such data were not available in Pensacola, Fla., and Spartanburg, S. C. Permits for demolitions were not required in 9 of the 41 cities, and such information was not available in Orlando, Fla., and Lynchburg, Va.; in Columbus, Ga., and Norfolk, Va., demolition data were not com­plete.

In table 1, the number of family dwellings provided in new build­ings, units resulting from additions and alterations to existing struc­tures, and units demolished in the South Atlantic cities in 1939 is compared with similar data for 1938.

3

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 10: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 1.— N um ber o f new fam ily-dw elling units provided, units added and eliminated by additions and alterations, and units demolished inSouth Atlantic cities, 1989 and 1988

S t a t e a n d c i t y

T o t a l ___________________________

D e l a w a r e : W i lm in g t o n

F a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s

N e w d w e l l in g s A d d i t i o n s a n d a l t e r a t io n s Demolitions

P o p u la t i o n , U n i t e d S t a t e s c e n s u s

P r i v a t e

21, 923

179

1938

18,128

129

F e d e r a l I n c r e a s e

12,000 251 (2)

1938

(2)

D e c r e a s e P r i v a t e

(2)

1938 1939

(2) (2) (2)

F e d e r a l i

1939

1930

1938

161 3 ,826 ,115

106, 597

P e r c e n t -

c h a n g e1930-40

+ 1 5 .4

+ 5 .5

D i s t r i c t o f C o lu m b ia : W a s h in g t o n . 6,178 4,302 326 18 21 43 318 3 157 25 486,869 + 3 6 .2

F l o r i d a ____________________. .

J a c k s o n v i l l e _________M i a m i __________________O r l a n d o _______________P e n s a c o la _____________S t . P e t e r s b u r g _____T a m p a _________________W e s t P a l m B e a c h .

5,964

1,270 2, 639

506 201 854 188 306

4, 339

914 2,116

270 139 563 105 232

2, 511

1,075174240242534246

230

230

(2)623944

(*)117

51

(2)

(4)

(2)

(4)

(2)

(4)

(2)

(4)

377

2401923

38

7014

507 __

62 * 105

35 305

467, 291 + 3 3 .2

129, 549 110, 637

27, 330 31, 579 40, 425

101,161 26,610

+ 3 3 .6+ 5 5 .6+ 3 4 .4+ 1 8 .6+ 5 0 .4

+ 7 .1+ 2 6 .6

G e o r g i a __________

A t l a n t a ____A u g u s t a _ _ C o lu m b u sM a c o n ______S a v a n n a h .

1,607

815148230

90324

1,155

64092

13950

234

4,649 3

2,400 3335 _______752 _______506 _______656 _______

114

8442

1014

(2)101

41

(4)33

2 (2)

2(4)

118 216 2,256 512, 692 +12.24 30

23 7 8 23 34

9956

51640

956 65

8 451 188 656

270, 366 60, 342 43,131 53, 829 85, 024

+11.8 + 9 .2

+ 23. 5 + 7 .5

+ 1 2 .9

M a r y l a n d __________

B a l t im o r e ____C u m b e r l a n d .H a g e r s t o w n .

2,441 2,375 998 409 281

2, 284 87 70

2, 242 72 61

360 2007 5

42 76

12 4 365 370 344 873,482 +6.612 4 339 362 344

26 8

804, 874 37, 747 30, 861

+ 6 .7+ 4 .6+ 5 .3

N o r t h C a r o l i n a .

A s h e v i l l e - . . C h a r l o t t e - . .D u r h a m _____G r e e n s b o r o . H ig h P o i n t .

2, 325

52675359399130

2,662

54507425328215

1, 632

708

97

6122

3614

11247

1039

1(2)(9)

118(9) 2(9)

(9)(9)(9)

220

36

420,142 + 1 1 .9

50,193 82, 67552, 03753, 569 36, 745

+2.2+22.0+ 1 5 .7+ 1 0 .7

+ 4 .8

BU

ILDIN

G

PE

RM

IT SU

RV

EY,

193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 11: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

R a le i g h ____________W i l m i n g t o n . . .W in s t o n - S a le m

g o u t h C a r o l i n a ______

C h a r l e s t o n ______C o lu m b ia ________G r e e n v i l l e _______S p a r t a n b u r g . . .

V i r g i n i a __________________

L y n c h b u r g ______N e w p o r t N e w s .N o r f o l k ____________P e t e r s b u r g ______P o r t s m o u t h _____R i c h m o n d _______R o a n o k e __________

W e s t V i r g i n i a _________

C h a r l e s t o n ______C l a r k s b u r g ______H u n t i n g t o n ______P a r k e r s b u r g _____W h e e l i n g _________

22447

439

748

2563288678

1, 435

18641

54425

136348155

1, 046

41599

28216090

42240

671

574

122255132

65

1 ,5 6 8

22543

5582872

54498

1 ,0 2 4

53672

223108

85

462462

910

430480

974

474

500

87

12161323

(2)17

412

(2)

(4) (4)

577

42

239

33

1576

231829

90

5875

182

227

74

913

277124

1006311

72

17

(2) (2)

(4) (4) ____ 1

1

1

1

(9)(9)

46

(2)

(9)(9)

71

(2)

(9)(9) '(2)

61(9)( 9) '

446

(4)10 n 141

328

16047

(2)

15212

558

11739

(2)125

1(9)(9)

5

113

(9)(9)

55129

457 136

io 287 170

136

205

154

"~51

37 , 379 32 , 270 7 5, 274

+ 2 5 .5+ 3 . 5+6.0

171, 723 + 1 6 .8

62 , 265 51, 581 2 9 ,1 5 4 28 , 723

+ 1 4 .5 +21. 0 + 1 9 .1 + 1 2 .3

5 3 1 ,1 9 1 + 7 . 2

4 0 , 661 34 , 417

129, 710 28 , 564 45 , 704

1 8 2 ,9 2 9 6 9 , 206

+ 9 . 5+ 7 . 7

+ 1 1 .3+ 7 . 2

+11.0+ 5 . 5+.1

2 5 6 ,1 2 8 + 4 . 8

60 , 4 08 28, 866 75, 572 29 , 623 6 1 ,6 5 9

+ 1 2 .4+ 5 . 9+ 4 . 3+1.6

- . 9

1 P e r m i t s w e r e n o t is s u e d fo r d e m o l i t io n s i n c o n n e c t io n w i t h F e d e r a l h o u s in g p r o je c t s w i t h t h e e x c e p t io n o f 83 o f t h e 344 u n i t s d e m o l is h e d i n 1939 a t th e s i te o f E d g a r A l l e n P o e H o m e s a t B a l t im o r e , M d . , a n d 89 o f t h e 136 u n i t s d e m o l is h e d i n 1938 a t t h e s i t e o f R o b e r t M i l l s M a n o r i n C h a r le s t o n , S . C . T h e s i te s o f F o r t D u p o n t D w e l l i n g s a t W a s h in g t o n , D . C . ; t h e 3 p r o je c t s a t M i a m i , F l a . ; D u n b a r V i l l a g e a t W e s t P a l m B e a c h , F l a . ; O lm s t e d H o m e s a t A u g u s t a , G a . ; A r m is t e a d G a r d e n s a t B a l t im o r e , M d . ; L i t t l e - p a g e T e r r a c e a t C h a r le s t o n , W . V a . ; a n d M a r c u m T e r r a c e a t H u n t in g t o n , W . V a . , w e r e v a c a n t l a n d , a n d t h e r e fo r e n o d e m o l i t io n s w e r e n e c e s s a r y .

2 I n f o r m a t io n n o t c o m p le t e .3 D o e s n o t i n c l u d e f a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s i n a g ro u p o f s in g le - f a m i ly a t t a c h e d h o u s e s to

b e d e m o l is h e d f o r w h i c h t h e n u m b e r o f u n i t s w a s n o t r e p o r t e d .i D a t a n o t a v a i l a b l e .

5 I n c lu d e s 86 u n i t s f o r w h i c h d e m o l i t io n c o n t r a c t s w e r e a w a r d e d i n 1940 a t t h e s i t e o f A r a g o n C o u r t h o u s in g p r o je c t .

6 T h e s e 5 u n i t s w e r e d e m o l is h e d i n 1940 b y W . P . A . l a b o r a t t h e s i t e o f S u n s e t H o m e s .7 D o e s n o t in c lu d e f a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s c o n t a in e d i n 7 b u i ld in g s to b e d e m o l is h e d fo r

w h i c h t h e n u m b e r o f u n i t s w a s n o t r e p o r t e d .s I n c lu d e s 248 u n i t s fo r w h i c h d e m o l i t io n c o n t r a c t s w e r e a w a r d e d i n 1940 a t t h e s i t e o f

G e o rg e F . P e a b o d y A p a r t m e n t s .9 D e m o l i t io n p e r m i t s n o t r e q u i r e d .10 I n c lu d e s 139 u n i t s fo r w h i c h d e m o l i t io n c o n t r a c t s w e r e a w a r d e d i n 1940 a t t h e s i t e

o f W r a g g B o r o u g h H o m e s .11 D o e s n o t in c lu d e f a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s i n 2 b u i ld in g s to b e d e m o l is h e d f o r w h i c h t h e

n u m b e r o f u n i t s w a s n o t r e p o r t e d .

Oi

RE

SIDE

NT

IAL

C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 12: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

6 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 193 9

Privately Financed Residential ConstructionType of Structure

Information collected concerning the type of structure in privately financed residential construction showed an increase of single-family dwellings in 1939 over 1938 and a corresponding decrease in units in structures housing 3 or more families. Seventy-five percent of the new units for which permits were issued in 1939 were single-family houses and 21 percent were in 3-or-more family structures. In 1938, 69 percent of the units were 1-family dwellings and 27 percent were in multifamily buildings. In 1939 a large number (76 percent) of the 16,350 single-family residences were detached, 16 percent were at­tached, and 8 percent were semidetached. Table 2 shows the distri­bution, by city, of units in the various types of structures for which permits were issued in 1939.

All of the new units in Tampa, Fla.; Petersburg, Va.; and Wheeling, W. Va.; and at least 95 percent of those in Pensacola, Tampa, and West Palm Beach, Fla.; Atlanta, Augusta, and Columbus, Ga.; Durham and High Point, N. C.; were single-family houses. At the other extreme, only 43 percent of the units in Washington, D. C., and 39 percent in Wilmington, Del., were one-family houses. Fifty- four percent of the new accommodations in Wilmington and 43 per­cent in Washington were in apartment buildings housing five or more families.

In Baltimore, Md., and Washington, D. C., the one-family row house was of considerable importance, accounting for 57 percent and 19 percent, respectively, of the total.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 13: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 7T a b l e 2 .— N um ber o f fam ily-dw elling units in privately financed structures for

which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure, 1989 1

T y p e o f s t r u c t u r e

S t a t e a n d C i t y T o t a l

1 - fa m ily -

| 2

-fa

mil

y,

2-d

eck

er

[ 1-

an

d 2

- fa

mil

y a

nd

co

mm

er­

cia

l u

nit

3- f

am

ily

, 3

-de

cke

r 1

4-f

am

ily

j 3-

an

d 4

- fa

mil

y a

nd

co

mm

er­

cia

l u

nit

5 -o r-m o re - f a m i l y ,

w i t h o u t c o m m e r ­c ia l u n i t

5 -or-m o r e -f a m i l y

a n dc o m ­

m e r c ia lu n i t

73©Sio03©Q

73©SiOc3

<

73©■3c3©73

1DO

Si)c

2'3pq

VI‘3fc>

bfl.3BBpq

CO

s

T o t a l _____________ ______________________ 2 1 ,9 2 3 1 2 ,3 8 2 2 , 588 1 ,3 8 0 866 93 57 1 ,0 9 6 23 190 3 , 373 7 65

D e la w a r e : W i l m i n g t o n . . _____ 179 13 24 32 14 4 96D i s t r i c t o f C o lu m b ia : W a s h -

in g t o n _____ 1_____________________________ 6 ,1 7 8 1 ,2 3 1 1 ,2 0 3 232 324 11 15 524 9 127 2, 589 3 40

F l o r i d a . . _________________________ 5 ,9 6 4 5 ,1 8 4 3 256 82 22 6 192 7 18 206 1 6

J a c k s o n v i l l e ................................. 1 ,2 7 0 1 ,1 1 0 2 26 2 6 24 12 100M i a m i ____________________________ 2 , 639 2, 307 3 108 42 14 132 "~7~ 3 20 1 6O r la n d o __________________ 506 380 48 6 8 1 64P e n s a c o la . _______________ 201 191 8 2S t . P e t e r s b u r g _____ _________ ___ 854 706 88 8 2 28 2 22T a m p a . 188 188W e s t P a l m B e a c h ____________ 306 302 2 2

G e o r g ia . _____________________ 1, 607 1 ,4 3 4 106 8 14 3 36 1 6

A t l a n t a . ____________________ 815 707 88 2 4 8 1 6A u g u s t a _____________________ 1 . 148 141 2 2 3C o lu m b u s __________________ 230 217 10 3M a c o n . _ ____ _ _ 90 76 2 12S a v a n n a h _______________ 324 293 6 2 7 16

M a r y l a n d . ________ ___________ 2 ,4 4 1 600 1 ,3 1 1 262 84 10 16 18 158

B a l t im o r e . _ _________________ 2 , 284 469 1 ,3 1 1 260 74 4 8 18 158C u m b e r l a n d - ___________________ 87 77 2 4 4H a g e r s t o w n _______________ 70 54 io 2 4

N o r t h C a r o l i n a ________________________ 2 , 325 1 ,4 4 7 40 374 124 6 6 172 7 6 149

A s h e v i l l e ____________________________ 52 49 3C h a r l o t t e __________________________ 675 395 40 24 108 48 1 60D u r h a m ______________ _________ 359 172 180 3 4G r e e n s b o r o ________ ________ 399 276 78 4 1 24 2 16H ig h P o i n t . __________ . . . 130 122 6 2R a le i g h . _______ ___________ 224 131 2 12 4 7 2 68W i lm in g t o n ____________ 47 36 4 3 4W i n s t o n - S a l e m _____ 439 266 80 88 1 5

S o u t h C a r o l i n a . __ _________________ 748 526 84 32 7 6 48 _____ 3 32 2 13

C h a r l e s t o n ____ ______________ ___ 256 182 6 30 6 32C o l u m b ia _________ ________________ 328 236 46 1 3 16 2 20 1 6G r e e n v i l l e __________ ________________ 86 42 32 ~2~ 3 1 7S p a r t a n b u r g . . _______ ________ 78 66 1 12

V i r g i n i a . . __________________________ 1 ,4 3 5 1 ,0 9 9 7 22 128 2 12 52 9 113

L y n c h b u r g _________________________ 186 173 6 1 7N e w p o r t N e w s _______________ 41 36 1 5N o r f o l k . _________________________ 544 358 14 36 2 9 32 6 93P e t e r s b u r g ________________________ 25 22 3P o r t s m o u t h ........................ .................. 136 118 2 16R i c h m o n d _____________ . . . 348 264 4 6 74R o a n o k e . . . .............................. 155 128 2 10 3 4 1 8

W e s t V i r g i n i a .............. ..................................... 1 ,0 4 6 848 12 70 21 9 56 _____ 4 24 1 6

C h a r l e s t o n ______________________ _ 415 301 2 40 15 32 3 19 1 6C l a r k s b u r g ____________________ __ 99 76 4 4 3 12H u n t i n g t o n ............... .................. ............ 2 82 252 2 2 r 3 4P a r k e r s b u r g _______________________ 160 133 2 4 5 3 8 1 5W h e e l i n g _____________________ _ . 90 86 4

1 D a t a fo r f a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s w i t h p e r m i t v a lu a t io n s le s s t h a n $500 a r e n o t i n c lu d e d i n t h e S u r v e y .

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 14: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

8 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

Exterior Construction Material

Information on exterior construction material which was collected for 21,827 of the 21,923 new privately financed accommodations in the South Atlantic cities indicated that brick and frame were the favored types of surface material. Thirty-seven percent of the new units for which data were available were in brick buildings and 33 percent, in frame structures. Units in structures of brick veneer and stucco were about equally divided and each accounted for 11 percent of the total. As shown by table 3 frame was used more often than any other material for single-family structures, while brick was specified extensively for 2-family and multifamily buildings.

The high percentage of units in brick buildings was caused in a large part by the extensive use of that material in residential con­struction in Washington, D. C., and Baltimore, Md. In Washington 5,349 units (87 percent of the city’s total) and in Baltimore 1,597 units (70 percent of the total) were specified in brick buildings. Brick was favored also in Wilmington, Del., where 97 percent of the units were in buildings of this material.

The use of stucco was confined largely to construction in Miami, Fla. In this city 2,192, or 83 percent, of the new accommodations were specified in stucco buildings.

Brick veneer predominated in Macon, Ga.; Charlotte, N. C.; Columbia, S. C.; and Roanoke, Va.; and was utilized about as often as frame in Jacksonville, Fla.; Columbus, Ga.; and Lynchburg, Va. Frame was favored in all the remaining cities. At least nine-tenths of the units in West Palm Beach, Fla., and Newport News and Portsmouth, Va., were in frame buildings.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 15: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 3 .— N um ber of fam ily-dw elling units in privately financed structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities,by type of structure and specified materials, 1939

T y p e o f s t r u c t u r e a n d m a t e r ia l

S t a t e a n d c i t y1 - fa m ily 2 - f a m i ly * M u l t i f a m i l y 2

F r a m e

T o t a l ,

D e la w a r e : W i lm in g t o n ______________D i s t r i c t o f C o lu m b ia : W a s h in g ­

t o n ____________________________________________

F l o r i d a ,

J a c k s o n v i l l e ___________M i a m i ___________________O r la n d o _________________P e n s a c o la ______________S t . P e t e r s b u r g _______T a m p a ___________________W e s t P a lm B e a c h ,

G e o r g ia ,

A t l a n t a _____A u g u s t a ____C o l u m b u s , .M a c o n _______S a v a n n a h , ,

M a r y l a n d ,

B a l t im o r e _____C u m b e r l a n d , H a g e r s t o w n , ,

6, 859

164

2, 626

545404347169725159277

1 ,0 4 7

58793

11131

225

239

1714325

See footnotes at end of table.

B r i c k

4 ,3 3 7

64

2, 364

55

3 5 54

221 ,4 3 6

1,4012114

B r i c kv e n e e r

2 ,0 4 2

24

535

516

20135

1073945

7

S tu c -

12 ,0 4 6

1 ,9 7 6

O th e rm a t e ­r ia l s

968

4

213

162

4631310

N o t r e ­p o r te d

19

F r a m e

273

26

B r i c k

14

311

1

B r i c kv e n e e r

18

18

S t u c -O t h e rm a t e ­r i a l s

N o t r e ­p o r te d F r a m e

155

30

B r i c k

3, 364

96

2, 674

100100

154

4

B r i c kv e n e e r

27

S t u c ­co

214

165

24

O t h e rm a t e ­r i a l s

503

68

N o t r e ­p o r te d

CO

RE

SIDE

NT

IAL

C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 16: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 3 .— N um ber o f fam ily-dw elling units in privately financed structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities,by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

T y p e o f s t r u c t u r e a n d m a t e r ia l

S t a t e a n d c i t y1 - fa m ily 2 - f a m i ly i M u l t i f a m i l y 2

F r a m e B r i c kB r i c k

v e n e e rS t u c ­

co

O t h e rm a t e ­r i a l s

N o t r e ­p o r te d F r a m e B r i c k

B r i c kv e n e e r

S t u c ­co

O t h e rm a t e ­r i a l s

N o t r e ­p o r t e d F r a m e B r i c k

B r i c kv e n e e r

S t u c ­co

O t h e rm a t e ­

r i a l s

N o t r e ­p o r te d

N o r t h C a r o l i n a _ __________ ______ 1 ,1 9 9 75 551 18 18 65 6 51 8 31 187 112 4

A s h e v i l l e _ _ _ _____________ 39 3 6 1 3C h a r lo t t e _ _____ ___________________ 134 57 249 1 18 56 44 8 16 60 28 4D u r h a m . . ___________________ ____ 278 74 7G r e e n s b o r o __________________ . . 231 2 114 7 3 2 12 28H ig h P o in t 96 30 2 2R a le i g h . ___________________________ 94 5 30 4 4 4 4 4 75W i lm in g t o n _ _ _ _ 36 4 2 1 4W in s t o n - S a le m 291 g 44 3 4 37 52

S o u t h C a r o l i n a ________ 345 14 242 4 5 32 5 2 22 13 32 16 12 4

C h a r l e s t o n __________________ _________ 173 6 1 3 5 32 2 2 12 16 4C o lu m b ia ________________ _____ 64 3 215 1 7 6 20 12G r e e n v i l l e . . _ ________ ______________ 49 4 20 1 2 3 7S p a r t a n b u r g ........... ................................. ... 59 1 6 12

V i r g i n i a y 756 134 204 1 24 9 79 31 18 2 43 84 50

L y n c h b u r g _ _ _ 89 3 79 1 1 6 7N e w p o r t N e w s . _ . 32 3 1 5N o r f o lk _ _ _ _ _ 328 6 31 1 6 31 1 6 26 73 35P e t e r s b u r g .................................................. 19 2 4P o r t s m o u t h __ . . . . 111 6 1 2 12 4R i c h m o n d _______ ____________ 152 106 15 1 46 26 2R o a n o k e ................. ................................. 25 14 84 6 1 4 6 4 11

W e s t V i r g i n i a ___________________ ___________ 582 156 52 15 44 11 33 37 4 4 9 4 11 52 4 9 19

C h a r le s t o n _______ 204 51 24 14 10 26 16 2 4 7 32 9 16C la r k s b u r g . __________ 49 12 7 9 3 2 2 3 8 4H u n t in g t o n _ . __________ ___ 149 78 3 20 2 2 19 2 4 3P a r k e r s b u r g _____________________ _ 106 14 8 3 4 5 2 2 8 8W h e e l in g __________________ _ _ 74 1 10 I 2 2

i I n c lu d e s 1- a n d 2 - f a m i ly d w e l l in g s w i t h s t o r e s . 2 I n c lu d e s m u l t i f a m i l y d w e l l in g s w i t h s t o r e s .

BUILD

ING

PER

MIT

SUR

VEY, 193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 17: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 11

Permit Valuations

Approximately three-fifths of all the new privately financed units authorized during 1939 in the 41 South Atlantic cities had valuations ranging from $2,000 to $4,500 per unit. Eighteen percent of the accommodations were in the $500 to $2,000 cost group, while, at the other extreme, only 2 percent were to cost $10,000 and over. The accompanying chart indicates, however, some distinct variations in valuations between cities with a population of 100,000 and over, and those with populations in the 25,000-100,000 group. For ex­ample, the valuation stated most frequently on permits issued in the smaller cities was between $500 and $1,000, while in the larger cities the most commonly reported valuation was between $2,000 and $2,500. A greater number of units in the $4,500-and-over cost group was reported for the larger cities (24 percent) than for those in the smaller population group (19 percent). Moreover, only 11 percent of the units in the larger cities were to cost less than $2,000, while 30 percent of those in the smaller communities were to cost from $500 to $2,000. From approximately one-half to nearly two-thirds of the units in Pensacola, Fla.; Durham, Greensboro, High Point, Wilmington, and Winston-Salem, N. C.; Greenville, S. C.; and Petersburg, Va.; were included within the latter limits.

The great number of units in the larger cities to cost from $2,000 to $2,500 was due partially to a concentration in this cost group of units in apartment houses in Washington, D. C.

The permit valuations are estimates of construction costs made by prospective builders and do not include land and other costs.

Table 4 shows the distribution of the new family-dwelling units by permit valuation per unit and type of structure for cities of 100,000 population and over and for cities in the 25,000 to 100,000 population group.

2 7 1 7 1 1 °— 42------ 2

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 18: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

fcO

PERCENT OF UNITS

PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF NEW PRIVATELY FINANCED FAMILY-DWELLING UNITS IN SOUTH ATLANTIC CITIES

BY COST GROUP AND SIZE OF CITY, 1939 PERCENT OF UNITS

BUILD

ING

PERM

IT SU

RVEY,

193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 19: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 13T a b l e 4 .— N um ber o f fam ily-dw ellin g units in privately financed structures fo r

which building perm its were issued in 41 South Atlantic cities, by perm it valuation per unit and typ e o f structure, 193 9 1

9 C I T I E S O F 1 00 ,0 00 A N D O V E R

P e r m i t v a lu a t io n p e r f a m i l y ­d w e l l in g u n i t

T o t a l __________________

$ 2 5 ,0 0 0 a n d o v e r .$ 2 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 4 ,9 9 9 ____$ 2 0 ,0 0 0 -$ 2 2 ,4 9 9 ____$ 1 7 ,5 0 0 -$ 1 9 ,9 9 9 ____$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 7 ,4 9 9 _ _ _

$ 1 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 1 4 ,9 9 9 ____$ 1 0 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 2 ,4 9 9 ____$ 9 ,5 0 0 -$ 9 ,9 9 9 _______$ 9 ,0 0 0 -$ 9 ,4 9 9 _______$ 8 ,5 0 0 -$ 8 ,9 9 9 _______

$ 8 ,0 0 0 -$ 8 ,4 9 9 _______$ 7 ,5 0 0 -$ 7 ,9 9 9 _______$ 7 ,0 0 0 -$ 7 ,4 9 9 _______$ 6 ,5 0 0 -$ 6 ,9 9 9 _______$ 6 ,0 0 0 -$ 6 ,4 9 9 _______

$ 5 ,5 0 0 -$ 5 ,9 9 9 _______$ 5 ,0 0 0 -$ 5 ,4 9 9 _______$ 4 ,5 0 0 -$ 4 ,9 9 9 _______$ 4 ,0 0 0 -$ 4 ,4 9 9 _______$ 3 ,5 0 0 -$ 3 ,9 9 9 _______

$ 3 ,0 0 0 -$ 3 ,4 9 9 _______$ 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 ,9 9 9 _______$ 2 ,0 0 0 -$ 2 ,4 9 9 _______$ 1 ,5 0 0 - $ l ,9 9 9 _______$ 1 ,0 0 0 -1 1 ,4 9 9 _______$ 5 0 0 -$ 9 9 9 ____________

32 C I T I E S

T o t a l - . _____________________________________ 7 , 478 5, 735

$ 2 5 ,0 0 0 a n d o v e r __________________ __ 6 6$ 2 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 4 ,9 9 9 __________________________ 3 3$ 2 0 ,0 0 0 -$ 2 2 ,4 9 9 __________________________ 3 3$ 1 7 ,5 0 0 -$ 1 9 ,9 9 9 __________________________ 5 5$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 7 ,4 9 9 __________________________ 19 18

$ 1 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 1 4 ,9 9 9 __________________________ 21 21$ 1 0 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 2 ,4 9 9 __________________________ 71 71$ 9 ,5 0 0 -$ 9 ,9 9 9 _____________________________ 18 17$ 9 ,0 0 0 -$ 9 ,4 9 9 ______________________________ 44 28$ 8 ,5 0 0 -$ 8 ,9 9 9 _____________________________ 16 16

$ 8 ,0 0 0 -$ 8 ,4 9 9 _____________________________ 47 47$ 7 ,5 0 0 -$ 7 ,9 9 9 _____________________________ 47 45$ 7 ,0 0 0 -$ 7 ,4 9 9 _____________________________ 91 89$ 6 ,5 0 0 -$ 6 ,9 9 9 _____________________________ 55 49$ 6 ,0 0 0 -$ 6 ,4 9 9 _____________________________ 180 167

[ A

ll t

yp

es

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

---

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

--

T y p e o f s t r u c t u r e

1 - f a m i ly

j 2-f

am

ily

, 2

-de

cke

r

1-

an

d

2-f

am

ily

, a

nd

co

mm

er-

1

cia

l u

nit

3-f

am

ily

, 3

-de

cke

r

1

728

lH

1

3-

an

d

4-f

am

ily

a

nd

co

mm

er-

1

05

1 c

ial

un

it

5 -o r-m o re - f a m i l y ,

w i t h o u t c o m m e r ­c ia l u n i t

5-or-m o re -

f a m i l y ,a n d

c o m m e r ­c ia l u n i t

De

tac

he

d

Att

ac

he

d

j

Se

mid

eta

ch

ed

Bu

ild

ing

s

'3

3 ,0 6 2

OTbn.32*3

4

CO

*3

4614, 445 6 . 647 2, 545 742 592 37 30 171

5 5

_ _ _

2 211 8 3

9 933 31 2

51 48 2 1156 155 1

20 2090 88 281 77 4

192 162 25 2 3147 120 16 2 1 9215 162 46 4 3176 157 12 4 3303 256 24 20 3

259 211 35 12 1968 665 150 81 14 2 4 5 52710 548 38 39 4 2 12 3 7 64

1, 633 806 510 236 12 6 4 2 41 1 181 ,5 0 4 831 179 88 18 3 12 27 373

2 ,1 4 6 898 632 48 82 1 3 24 3 21 436 2 191 ,8 3 2 594 562 52 124 3 64 4 35 4292 , 265 354 272 20 164 " 3 " 9 328 3 36 1 ,1 0 3 1 9

920 185 40 36 140 208 22 311455 126 40 16 4 9 64 10 196262 129 68 6 3 8 5 48

43 638 274 56 27 368 7 19 311 3 19

1

116

22

1 62 4 1 7

S e e fo o tn o te a t e n d o f t a b le .

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 20: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

1 4 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e 4 .— N um ber o f fa m ily-d w ellin g units in privately financed structures for which building perm its were issued in 41 South Atlantic cities, by perm it valuation per unit and typ e o f structure, 198 9 1— Continued

32 C I T I E S O F 2 5 ,0 0 0 T O 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 — C o n t in u e d

i W h e n t h e s t r u c t u r e p r o v id e d fo r a b u i l t - i n o r a t t a c h e d g a ra g e o r a c o m m e r c ia l u n i t , t h e c o s t o f s u c h u n i t i s i n c lu d e d . D a t a fo r f a m i l y - d w e l l i n g u n i t s w i t h p e r m i t v a lu a t io n s le s s t h a n $500 a r e n o t i n c lu d e d .

Table 5 shows the permit valuations reported in 1939 in the South Atlantic cities for privately financed single-family dwellings. Fifty- seven percent of the 16,350 single-family dwellings were to cost from $2,000 to $4,500 per unit. Eighty-five percent of the single-family dwellings within Baltimore, Md., were included within these limits. Likewise, approximately three-fourths of the accommodations in Jack­sonville, Fla.; Charlotte, N. C.; Charleston, S. C.; and Newport News and Portsmouth, Va.; had valuations ranging from $2,000 to $4,500. Higher priced houses, however, were reported in a number of cities, and the majority of single-family dwellings had valuations of $4,500 and over in the following cities: Wilmington, Del. (74 percent), Roanoke, Va. (56 percent), Washington, D. C. (55 percent), and Charleston, W. Va. (52 percent).

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 21: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 15T a b l e 5 .— Number of privately financed 1-family dwellings without commercial

space for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by permit valuation, 1989 1 2

Permit valuation per family-dwelling unit

Tota

l

Wilm

ingt

on, D

el.

Was

hing

ton,

D. O

.

Florida

Jack

sonv

ille

IM

iam

i

Orla

ndo

Pens

acol

a

St. P

eter

sbur

g

Tam

pa

Wes

t Pal

m B

each

Total....... ........... .............. ................. 16, 350 69 2,666 1,112 2,418 428 199 794 188 304$25,000 and over___________________ 11 5 3$22,500-$24,999____________ J_______ 5 1$20,000-$22,499____________________ 11 5 1 2$17,500-$19,999____________________ 14 7 2 1$15,000-$17,499- ____________ _____ 49 1 25 1 2 1 5 3$12,500-$! 4,999____________________ 71 38 4 3 2 6 1$10,000-$12,499_________ _____ _____ 226 3 109 12 13 7 1 11 1 5$9,500-$9,999 . _______________ 37 14 1 3 2 1 2$9,000-$9,499______________________ 116 2 62 4 2 5 1 6

-_I_$8,500-$8,999 _ _______________ 97 65 1 6 1 1 1

$8,000-$8,499 ___________ 236 129 6 14 5 1 7 2 1$7,500-$7,999 ____ 183 91 8 29 4 1 3 1$7,000-$7,499 . __________________ 301 143 12 28 12 15 2$6,500-$6,999______________________ 222 I 108 14 35 3 3 2 1 2$6,000-$6,499______________________ 467 8 148 14 59 15 4 13 7 8$5,500-$5,999______________________ 334 14 91 37 65 6 1 5 1 6$5,000-$5,499______________________ 1, 254 18 322 63 281 35 5 14 9 5$4,500-$4,999______________________ 965 4 112 91 294 13 8 34 2 14$4,000-$4,499______________________ 2,162 14 636 115 403 80 15 54 7 18$3,500-$3,999______________ ____ 1,627 3 178 176 381 40 10 67 24 35$3,000-$3,499 .......... 2,484 309 226 329 65 22 108 34 117$2,500-12,999 _______________ 1,805 44 173 187 16 15 132 15 18$2,000-$2,499______________________ 1,232 1 11 63 106 25 17 83 17 12$1,500-$1,999 ....... . 731 4 36 72 15 24 50 17 29$1,000-$1,499 __________ 619 4 26 54 19 27 85 22 22$500-$999____________________ ____ 1,091 6 28 47 57 44 88 26 4

Permit valuation per family-dwelling unit

Georgia Maryland

Atla

nta

Augu

sta

Colu

mbu

s

Mac

on

j Sav

anna

h

Balti

mor

e

Cum

berla

nd!

Hag

erst

own

Total____ _ ___________________ 795 143 227 76 299 2, 040 79 54$15,000-$17,499____________________ 1 1$12,500-$14,999 _ ______ _____ ■_ 1 3$10,000-$12,499____________________ 4 2 1 13$9,500-$9,999________ _____________ 1$9,000-$9,499 _ . _ i 12 1$8,500-$8,999_ ___________________ 3$8,000-$8,499______________________ 10 1 19 1$7,500-$7,999______________________ 1 6 1$7,000-$7,499 _ _ _ ______ 4 1 1 8 2 1$6,500-$6,999______________________ 1 1 1 5 2$6,000-$6,499______________________ 12 1 1 2 1 22 2 7$5,500-$5,999 ............... . 11 1 4 5 1 1$5,000-$5,499_____________ ____ ____ 37 7 6 5 4 111 3 5$4,500-$4,999______________________ 14 6 10 6 13 62 5 3$4,000-$4,499______________________ 73 6 38 10 16 218 8 4$3,500-$3,999______________________ 86 14 18 6 29 173 7 8$3,000-$3,499______ ________ _______ 146 23 31 9 33 450 13 7$2,500-$2,999______________________ 100 20 20 12 35 613 11 2$2,000-$2,499______________________ 103 11 10 4 43 277 8 3$1,500-$1,999______________________ 62 5 13 3 36 38 3 5$1,000-$1,499 46 9 13 5 29 9 2$500-$999_________________________ 89 37 66 7 53 5 2

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 22: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

1 6 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 193 9

T a b l e 5 .— Number of privately financed 1-family dwellings without commercial space for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by permit valuation, 1989 12— C on tin u e d

North Carolina South Carolina

Permit valuation per family-dwelling unit

Ashe

ville

| Ch

arlo

tte1

Dur

ham

Gree

nsbo

ro

Hig

h Po

int

| Ra

leig

h

Wilm

ingt

on

Win

ston

-Sal

em

1Ch

arle

ston

1 !

Colu

mbi

a

Gree

nvill

e

Spar

tanb

urg

Total___________________ 49 459 352 354 128 133 40 346 188 282 74 661 1

$22,500-$24,999 1$20,000-$22,499 ____$17 500-$19,999 1 1$15,000-$17,499 1 1

$12,500-$14,999 1 1 1 1 1 3$10,000-$12,499 . ______ 3 1 7 1 1 1 3 2$9,500- $9,999 1 1 3 1 1 1$9,000-$9,499 ____ 1 1 2 1 1$8,500-$8,999 1 1 1 1 1$8,000-$8,499 . _______ 1 3 2 4 3 2 1 2$7,500-$7 999 3 4 1 3 1 2 1 4$7,000-$7,499 _____ 5 5 5 5 2 1 1 2$6,500-$6,999 __ _______ 3 5 3 1 1 2 2$6'000-$6',499____________ 1 18 3 5 2 12 1 2 4 1 1$5,500-$5,999 _ ______ 1 4 3 5 2 4 3 1 2$5,000-$5,499____________ 1 25 2 19 3 24 2 6 9 15 5 -$4,500-$4,999__ _______ 6 29 20 20 12 7 1 10 2 8 3$4,000-$4,499____________ 2 49 16 46 6 14 1 17 22 19 3 2$3,500-$3,999____________ 1 48 24 19 6 4 1 10 27 30 3 3$3,000-$3,499___________ 5 148 12 10 5 8 2 33 28 71 4 11$2,500-$2,999_____ ____ 3 36 10 15 14 18 4 41 34 29 7 8$2,000-$2,499_____ _____ 57 51 31 12 6 3 33 25 31 7$1,500-$1,999___________ 7 3 54 20 4 6 6 55 10 23 6 5$1,000-$1,499____________ 3 6 36 36 16 5 7 28 8 11 14 4$500-$999 _____________ 11 15 96 109 42 9 12 101 16 27 21 10

Virginia West Virginia

Permit valuation per family-dwelling unit

Lync

hbur

g

New

port

New

s

Nor

folk

1Pe

ters

burg

1Po

rtsm

outh

Rich

mon

d

Roan

oke

Char

lest

on

1Cl

arks

burg

Hun

tingt

on

Pa

rker

sbur

g

Whe

elin

g

Total ____________ 173 36 372 25 118 274 130 303 80 252 135 90$25,000 and over 1$22,500-$24,999 _____ ___ 1 2$20,000-$22,499______ ___ 3$17,500-$19,999 . 1 1$15,000-$17,499 1 3 3$12,500-$14,999__________ 1 2 1 1$10,000-$12,499_______ 2 3 1 1 7 2 3 3 3$9,500-$9,999_ _ _____ 1 1 1 2$9,000-$9,499 2 3 1 3 1 1 2$8,500-$8,999_ ________ 1 3 3 5 1 1$8,000-$8,499 ....... ............. 2 5 4 4 4 3$7,500-$7,999_. 4 3 1 1 2 7 1$7,000-$7,499____________ 2 2 13 3 11 11 2 2$6,500-$6,999____________ 3 4 4 6 5 2 2$6.000-$6.499____________ 6 14 16 6 23 9 12 2 5

See footnote at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 23: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 17T a b l e 5 .— Number of 'privately financed 1-family dwellings without commercial

space for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by permit valuation, 1989 1 2— C o n tin u e d

Permit valuation per family-dwelling unit

Virginia West Virginia

Lync

hbur

g

New

port

New

s

Nor

folk

Pete

rsbu

rg

Port

smou

th

Rich

mon

d

M

io

Char

lest

on

Clar

ksbu

rg

Hun

tingt

on

Park

ersb

urg

Whe

elin

g

$5,500-$5,999____________ 4 2 13 9 12 8 3 8 1$5,000-$5,499____________ 11 1 36 19 18 61 5 36 13 13$4,500-$4,999____________ 18 23 1 23 25 18 3 18 12 8$4,000-$4,499_ _ _ __ 12 61 2 4 25 15 61 11 16 27 16$3,500-$3,999_____ _____ 31 1 44 8 33 13 8 9 24 14 11$3,000-$3,499____________ 18 5 45 3 31 39 10 24 4 13 22 11$2,500-$2,999____________ 7 12 36 3 17 40 5 14 9 13 13 4$2,000-$2,499____________ 12 9 48 1 32 20 5 15 8 18 13 1$1,500-$1,999____________ 19 6 14 5 18 18 3 12 5 17 3$1,000-$1,499____________ 16 14 1 6 4 6 3 16 3 4$500-$999_______________ 5 1 8 2 21 4 8 30 1 2

1 Data for family-dwelling units with permit valuations less than $500 are not included.2 Includes units in 1-family detached, attached, and semidetached structures.

Rooms per Dwelling Unit

Information concerning the number of rooms per dwelling unit was available for only 14,910 of the 18,205 accommodations in 34 of the cities covered by this report as shown in table 6. Of these 14,910 units, 32 percent contained 6 rooms, and 30 percent had 5 rooms. Units in 4- and 3-room structures were about equal in number, accounting for 14 percent and 13 percent, respectively, of the total. The 5-room size was favored for single-family detached houses, but 6 rooms were most prominent in 1-family attached dwellings, and 3 rooms in the semidetached houses. Units of 3 rooms were most common also in 2-family, 2-decker buildings, and 3-, 4-, and 5-or- more-family structures without commercial space.

There was some variation between the larger and smaller cities in regard to the size of the dwelling units. In the cities with a popula­tion of 100,000 and over the 6-room unit predominated, accounting for nearly two-fifths of the total as compared with one-fifth in the smaller cities. Conversely, the proportion of 5-room units was higher in the cities in the 25,000-100,000 population group (more than one-third) than in the larger municipalities (approximately one- fourth) .

Thirty-eight percent of the 12,140 single-family houses for which room data were collected in the South Atlantic cities contained 6 rooms and nearly as many, 34 percent, had 5 rooms. Baltimore, Md., and Washington, D. C., where the 6-room unit accounted for 74 percent and 53 percent, respectively, of the single-family dwellings, contributed to the large proportion of houses of this size. In a large number of the other cities, however, the 5-room unit predominated as shown by table 7.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 24: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 6.— Number of rooms per family-dwelling unit in privately financed structures for which building permits were issued in 34 South Atlantic Jrj*cities, by type of structure, 1939 1

34 SOUTH ATLANTIC CITIES

Type of structure Total 2

Rooms per family-dwelling unit

Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

All types___________________________ 18, 205 14,910 98 214 1,914 2,018 4,447 4,741 958 321 95 57 16 13 4 6 5 31-family, detached___________________ 9,099 8,430 1 65 259 854 3, 543 2, 532 689 291 94 57 16 13 4 4 5 31-family, attached________ ________ .. 2, 585 2, 532 3 100 430 1,834 151 13 11-family, semidetached____________ 1,254 1,178 42 460 118 137 296 110 152-family, 2-decker __________ ____ 794 774 2 299 214 192 60 5 21- and 2-family, and commercial unit 65 62 1 3 14 23 12 4 3 23-family, 3-decker - __ ____ __ 57 45 1 30 9 3 24-family _ _ __ 928 816 65 395 307 44 53- and 4- family, and commercial unit__ 16 13 5 85 -or-more-family, without commercial

unit ___ - _ __ 3,348 1,048 96 36 443 379 86 85- or-more-family, and commercial unit-- 59 12 6 6

7 SOUTH ATLANTIC CITIES OF 100,000 OR MORE POPULATION

All types___________________________ 11,618 9,210 81 110 1,000 1,014 2,433 3, 633 638 191 51 35 10 4 4 2 2 21-family, detached___________________ 4,152 4,087 1 24 45 214 1,689 1,468 375 162 50 35 10 4 4 2 2 21-family, attached __ _________ 2, 542 2, 529 100 430 1,834 151 13 11-family, semidetached - - _____ 634 602 2 54 38 99 285 110 142-family, 2-decker - ________ 550 540 2 242 147 107 40 21- and 2-family, and commercial unit__ 23 23 6 10 4 1 1 23-family, 3-decker 30 24 16 5 34-family „ 596 520 53 214 232 20 13- and 4-family, and commercial unit__ 9 6 3 35-or-more-family, without commercial

unit 3,042 879 80 29 420 265 81 45- or-more-family, and commercial unit. 40

BU

ILD

ING

P

ER

MIT

SU

RV

EY

, 1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 25: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

27 SOUTH ATLANTIC CITIES OF 25,000 TO 100,000 POPULATION

All types __________________ 6, 587 5, 700 17 104 914 1,004 2,014 1,108 320 130 44 22 6 9 4 3 11-family, detached - _________ 4,947

434, 343

341 214 640 1,854 1, 064 314 129 44 22 6 9 2 3 1

l-famdy, attached 31-family, semidetached 620 576 40 406 80 38 11 19,-familv, 2-deeker 244 234 57 67 85 20 51- and 2-family, and commercial unit -- 3-familv, 3-decker

42 39 1 3 8 13 8 3 1 227 21 1 14 4 2

4-family 332 296 12 181 75 24 43- and 4-family, and commercial unit _ _ 5- or-more-family, without commercial

unit

7 7 2 5306 169 16 7 23 114 5 4

5- or-more-family, and commercial unit. 19 12 6 6

1 Room data not available for Miami, Pensacola, Tampa, and West Palm Beach, Fla.; Cumberland, Md.; Charleston, S. C.; and Newport News, Va.2 Includes units for which number of rooms was not reported.

CO

RESID

ENTIAL

CON

STRU

CTION

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 26: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 7 .— N um ber of rooms contained in privately financed 1-fam ily dwellings without commercial space for which building perm its were issuedin 84 South Atlantic cities, 1989 1

toO

Rooms per family-dwelling unitState and city Totals

Total 12

Total__________________________Delaware: Wilmington__________District of Columbia: WashingtonFlorida________________________

Jacksonville________________Orlando____________________St. Petersburg______________

Georgia________________________Atlanta__ ____ _____________Augusta_______ ____ ________Columbus__________________Macon_____________________Savannah__________________

Maryland______________________Baltimore________ _______Hagerstown__________ _____ _

North Carolina_________________Asheville___________________Charlotte___________________Durham_____________ _____ _Greensboro_______ _________High Point_________________Raleigh________________ ____Wilmington________ ____ ___Winston-Salem______________

South Carolina_________________Columbia___________________Greenville__________________Spartanburg________________

12,938

2,6662, 3341,112

428 794

1,54079514322776

2992,0942,040

541,861

4945935235412813340

346

2827466

12,14058

2,640 2,3321,110

428 794

1,000733113

36784

2,0852,040

451, 779

3539135235412813340

3463842764266

722 1,072 4,110 4,662

6203

4132282

1664

1,052

471,412

549

12813

224

1963

1217775

130551139362537

3808782

40292036

13178

17

425511

27

199

133252

2322

1,516

302

294

151

39 12190

9664

1,50313

294

28212

372

56

111

195

1415477

23581

12235681798

117

793305423236

58118

22811198

101

1749

34 6

117

1447

4225

BUILD

ING

PER

MIT

SUR

VEY, 193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 27: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Virginia-----------Lynchburg..Norfolk____Petersburg __ Portsmouth. Richmond... Roanoke___

West Virginia.Charleston. _ Clarksburg.. Huntington. Parkersburg. Wheeling__

1,09217337225

11827413086030380

25213590

1,07117336519

11227213079130363

2508986

1 151 2

7 3 2 1

5 261 3

33 181 2

11727174

10 545

741817235

11

58174

2623

8212535

29511719944124

225 80 3441 15 761 11 37 1

15 351 23 1450 28 9

296 56 20127 20 919 1 379 24 634 4 137 7 1

1141

351T21

4 312

111

1

11 35 2

1222

1 Room data were not available for Miami, Pensacola, Tampa, and West Palm Beach, Fla.; Cumberland, Md.; Charleston, S. C.; and Newport News, Va.2 Includes units for which number of rooms was not reported.

to

RE

SIDE

NT

IAL

C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 28: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

22 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1 9 3 9

Demolitions

Permits were issued for the demolition of residential structures in 29 of the South Atlantic cities including the site of 1 of the 43 housing projects. Such data, however, were not complete in Colum-

T a b l e 8 .— Number of family-dwelling units in structures for which demolition permits were issued in 29 South Atlantic cities, by type of structure, 1939 1

1-family

y an

d in

it

U y an

d in

it

5-or-more-family

State and cityAl

l typ

es *81Q At

tach

ed

Sem

idet

ache

d

2-fa

mily

, 2-d

eck<

1 1

and

2-fa

mil;

co

mm

ercia

l i

3-fa

mily

, 3-d

eck(

4-fa

mily

3- an

d 4-

fam

il;

! co

mm

ercia

l i

With

out

com

­m

ercia

l uni

t 1 1

And

com

mer

­cia

l uni

t

Delaware: Wilmington _ __ _ 52 7 42 1 2District of Columbia: Wash­

ington _ ________ _____ 318 56 209 12 8 13 4 9 7Florida:

Jacksonville 83 66 4 12 1Miami. ____________ _ .. 16 16Pensacola _ ______ 39 39St. Petersburg. . . . 32 32Tampa 3 3West Palm Beach ___ _ 6 6

Georgia:Atlanta ______ _______ 30 24 6Augusta.. __ _______ _ 23 14 2 3 4Columbus 2 8 8Macon _ . . . . 23 22 1Savannah _______ ___ 34 15 11 2 2 4

Maryland:Baltimore _______ _ _. 422 17 394 2 9

Private wrecking opera­tions 339 17 311 2 9

Edgar Allen Poe Homes (U. S. H. A.) . 83 83

Hagerstown. ____ _____ 26 1016

North Carolina:Charlotte __ ________ 3118 118Greensboro ._ 2 2Winston-Salem____ __ __ 46 42 4

South Carolina:Charleston__ _ _ _____ 16 14 2Greenville________________ 2 2

Virginia:Newport News___ ______ 10 10Norfolk__________________ 4141 68 6 34 8 10 3 12Petersburg _______________ 3 1 2Portsmouth _ __________ 28 19 2 4 3Richmond __ ____________ 160 114 6 36 4Roanoke.________________ 47 42 5

West Virginia: Charleston 125 11 2 7 3 13 89Clarksburg__ ______ _. 1 1W heeling._______________ 5 5

1 Demolition permits were not required in Asheville, Durham, High Point, Raleigh, and Wilmington, N. C.; Columbia and Spartanburg, S. C.; and Huntington and Parkersburg, W. Va.; and such data were not available in Orlando, Fla., and Lynchburg, Va. No residential demolition permits were issued in 1939 in Cumberland, Md., although permits are required for demolitions in this city.

2 Does not include family-dwelling units contained in 7 buildings to be demolished for which the number of units was not reported.

3117 of these units were substandard dwellings eliminated throughout the city in accordance with the United States Housing Act of 1937.

4 Does not include family-dwelling units contained in 2 buildings to be demolished for which the number of units was not reported.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 29: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 23

bus, Ga., and Norfolk, Va. Demolition permits were not required in 9 of the cities covered by this report and data were not available in Orlando, Fla., and Lynchburg, Va. No permits were issued for the razing of residential structures during 1939 in Cumberland, Md., even though permits are required. Table 8 shows the number of units demolished, by city and type of structure. This table, however, includes only units for which demolition permits are issued. In many instances buildings are demolished without permits such as at the sites of State or Federal projects. For example, although 344 units were demolished at the site of Edgar Allen Poe Homes project at Baltimore, Md., only 83 of these were covered by permits. The units demolished in connection with the housing projects are shown in table 8.

In cities where complete demolition data were available, approxi­mately 1 dwelling unit was razed by private wrecking operation, for every 12 new units provided by private construction. The largest numbers of privately financed demolitions were 339 in Baltimore, Md., and 318 in Washington, D. C.

Although demolitions occurred throughout all types of residential structures, a large proportion of the razed units were single-family houses.

Housing Projects Financed From Federal Funds

In addition to the privately financed residential facilities provided in 1939 in the South Atlantic cities, 12,000 units in 9,800 buildings were authorized by the United States Housing Authority as shown in table 9. These 12,000 Federal financed units were provided in 43 proj­ects in 20 of the South Atlantic cities and varied in size from Armistead Gardens with 700 units, in Baltimore, Md., to Washington Square with 80 units, in Huntington, W. Va. One-fifth of all the low-rent accom­modations were authorized in housing developments at Atlanta, Ga. These 1,200 units together with 2 projects already completed and 2 more to be constructed constitute the most extensive public housing program of any city of its size in the country, and are the result of a widely recognized need for slum clearance and homes for low-income families. According to the 1939 report of the local housing authority, more than one-half of Atlanta’s dwellings are substandard.4

Housing projects were also authorized in the other Georgia cities covered by this report, bringing the total for the State to 4,649 family­dwelling units. Fellwood Homes in Savannah was planned to help relieve housing congestion in Yamacraw, a slum section of the city, and Yamacraw Village was built within the slum itself.5 One slum

4 Public Housing, Aug. 6, 1940.5 Public Housing, July 30,1940.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 30: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T able 9.— United States Housing Authority projects in 30 South Atlantic cities, 1939 t o

State, city, and name of project

Total___________________________________District of Columbia: Washington—Fort Du­

pont Dwellings________________________Florida__________________________________

Miami:Edison Courts____________________Liberty Square addition___________Liberty Square, second addition____

Orlando—Griffin Park________________Pensacola:

Aragon Court____________ _____Attucks Court____________________

St. Petersburg: Jordan Park___________Tampa:

North Boulevard Homes, I________North Boulevard Homes, II_______

West Palm Beach: Dunbar Village_____Georgia__________________________________

Atlanta:Clark Howell Homes______________John Hope Homes, pt. 1___________John Hope Homes, pt. 2___________John J. Eagan Homes_____________State Capitol Homes______________

Residential

New construction

Number of—

9,800

129 2,379

335346294174120120242350152246

429198308438552

£Q

12,000

326 2,511

345352378174120120242350184246

630248358548616

Units by type of structure

8,393

1142,294

330340252174120120242350120246

362148258328488

2, 304

64

1,232

100100220128

303

15126

280

12

so 3

gjo £j +5 a>o £ S

Number of family-dwelling units with—

1,312

58385

3528

15418

496

3,181

52726

156176

405024

1063270

1,074

21610010010838

5,396

159,009

12412414056624581

17691

1102,141

228109168320369

2, 061

57391

1343940 64

119

© 0 © 5 m P.

0)

507

621 86

19 35

2,256

451505(2)(2)

Nonresidential

25

46

BU

ILD

ING

P

ER

MIT

SU

RV

EY

, 1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 31: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Augusta:Olmsted Homes___________________Sunset Homes_____________________

Columbus:Booker T. Washington Apartments. Booker T. Washington Apartments,

addition_________________________George F. Peabody Apartments_____

Macon:Oglethorpe Homes_________________Tindall Heights___________________

Savannah:Fellwood Homes__________________Yamacraw Village__________ _______

Maryland________________ _______________ _Baltimore:

Armistead Gardens________________Edgar Allen Poe Homes____________

North Carolina___________________________Charlotte:

Fair view Homes__________________Piedmont Courts__________________

Raleigh:Chavis Heights____________________Halifax Court_____________________

Wilmington:Charles T. Nesbitt Courts__________New Brooklyn Homes_____________

South Carolina___________________________Charleston:

Anson Borough Homes____________Robert Mills Manor_______________Wragg Borough Homes____________

Columbia:Allen Benedict Court_______ ____Gonzales Gardens__________________

West Virginia_____________________________Charleston:

Littlepage Terrace__________ _______Washington Manor_______ _________

Huntington:Marcum Terrace___________________Northcott Court___________________Washington Square________________

167 167 167 58 72 37 1168 168 168 44 77 47 3 5 1232 288 176 112 56 56 104 72 156 182 104 60 44 22 22 38 22 47

316 360 272 88 44 201 115 1 248 1146 188 104 84 42 42 75 29 66 1242 318 166 152 76 76 122 44 122 1

176 176 176 68 84 24 176 1378 480 276 204 204 174 102 480 1 1746 998 618 168 12 200 444 392 162 344 1 1

658 700 616 84 280 284 136 188 298 2 84 12 200 164 108 26 344 1

1,434 1,682 1,236 396 179 283 875 295 220 3 3 1

406 452 360 92 46 46 268 92 3 1200 256 144 112 88 117 51 33 1 1

231 231 231 45 141 45 } 55 f 1231 231 231 45 139 47 1

172 216 128 88 88 96 32 26 1194 246 142 104 104 114 28 103 1

810 910 710 200 106 266 374 164 593 4 1 1

162 162 162 76 48 38 148 1128 140 116 24 24 96 20 4 136 1 1128 128 128 60 50 18 i 139 1

204 244 164 80 58 58 88 40 101 1188 236 140 96 48 48 92 48 69 1

470 974 272 232 150 320 88 336 446 104 205 1 2 1

36 170 4 48 118 76 76 18 150 304 102 202 88 28 174 14 154

224 284 164 120 120 116 48 1 1100 136 64 72 72 50 14 760 80 40 40 40 30 10 44 1

1 Demolition contracts awarded in 1940.2 No units demolished in 1939; all contracts were awarded after 1939.

3 Demolished in 1940 by W. P. A. labor.4 Demolition permits issued and contracts awarded in 1938. to

RE

SIDE

NTIA

L C

ON

STRU

CTIO

N

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 32: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

26 B U IL D IN G P E R M IT S U R V E Y , 1 9 3 9

dwelling was demolished on the site of both of these projects for each new unit provided.

During 1939, 2,511 units were authorized in low-rent projects in 6 Florida cities— 1,075 in Miami alone. Two additions, with a com­bined total of 730 accommodations, to the original Liberty Square project previously constructed, form a part of the largest Negro housing development in the South. The entire Liberty Square, when completely filled, will house approximately 10 percent of Miami’s Negro population 6 with lower rents than for substandard housing. All of the projects in Miami were built on vacant land.

North Boulevard Homes, consisting of 2 sections with a total of 534 units for Negro tenants, occupies a former slum district of Tampa. Three hundred and five units were demolished at the site. The need for housing is acute in Tampa as in oth'er cities covered by this report. Tampa developed in 60 years from a village of 720 persons to an industrial city of well over 100,000 population with very little time for city planning. There are large slum areas, and between 1930 and 1938 more dwellings were demolished than were built.7

Likewise in Charlotte, N. C., residential construction has not kept pace with the growing population. To help fill this need 2 housing projects were authorized, housing a total of 708 families. Because of the acute shortage of housing in the city the 2 developments were built on virtually vacant land. Only 33 substandard units were demolished on the site of Piedmont Courts and 3 units on the site of Fairview Homes.

Other projects in the North Carolina cities consisted of 2 develop­ments housing 461 families in Raleigh, and 2 projects with 462 units in Wilmington. Residential construction in Wilmington has been con­fined largely to families in the middle and upper-income brackets and has provided very few homes for low-income families.8 Most of the new homes have been built in the suburbs; only 47 new dwelling units were provided by private construction in the city in 1939 and 40 in 1938.

In Baltimore, Md., in addition to Armistead Gardens, housing 700 families, 298 units were provided in Edgar Allen Poe Homes. The latter was a slum-clearance project with 344 units demolished at the site while Armistead Gardens was built on vacant land.

Nine hundred and ten units were provided in 5 projects in 2 South Carolina cities, Charleston and Columbia, and 974 accommodations in Charleston and Huntington, W. Va.

6 Public Housing, Sept. 10, 1940.7 Public Housing, Mar. 26, 1940.8 Public Housing, Aug. 20, 1940.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 33: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 27

Fort Dupont Dwellings, built on vacant land, in Washington, D. C., was planned to house 326 families. The District of Columbia also has a housing problem due to the great increase in population in recent years and the prospect of rapid increases of Government personnel.

A large proportion (70 percent) of the 12,000 new accommodations were single-family attached houses, and 19 percent were in 2-family dwellings. The 5-room dwelling unit predominated, accounting for 45 percent of the accommodations, and the 4-room unit was next with 27 percent.

Brick or concrete was used almost exclusively as exterior construc­tion material for the housing projects. Concrete was utilized for all of the developments in the Florida cities with the exception of the 2 projects, of tile construction, located in Pensacola. The John Hope Homes and the John J. Eagan Homes in Atlanta were also of concrete construction, as well as the two Savannah, Ga., projects and Armi- stead Gardens in Baltimore, Md. Brick was specified for the re­mainder of the developments.

Nonresidential construction in connection with most of the projects consisted of an administration or community building.

Nonhousekeeping Residential Construction Type of Structure and Permit Valuations

Nonhousekeeping residential construction in 1939 in 16 of the South Atlantic cities amounted to $3,269,000 for 94 buildings. As indicated by table 10 this type of construction was considerably greater than in 1938, when permits were issued for 38 buildings with a total valuation of $2,089,000.

In 1939 dormitories accounted for 44 percent of the total valuation and hotels, for 22 percent. These types of structures also had the highest valuations reported in 1938.

Columbia, S. C., stood first among the municipalities in 1939 in respect to dollar volume with $1,006,000 reported for nonhousekeeping residential construction. A hotel valued at $500,000, and two dormi­tories with a combined total of $506,000 were authorized in this city. In the other cities covered by this report valuations ranged from $550,000 in Washington, D. C., to $7,000 in Greenville, S. C.

271711°—42----- 3

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 34: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 10.— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential structures for which building permits werecities, by type of structure, 19S9 and 1938 1

in South Atlantic L3 00

State and city YearTotal Association

buildingsBachelor

apartments Convents Dormitories Homes for the aged Hotels

Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation

Total . . ___________________ 1939 94 $3, 268,638 2 $313,000 1 $18,000 10 $1, 441, 227 1 $300,000 6 $724, 5001938 38 2, 089', 450 1 $2,650 1 23, 750 15 1, 671, 394 6 182,000

Delaware: Wilmington _____________ 1939 2 401, 500 1 296,000District of Columbia: Washington______ 1939 2 550,000 1 250,000 1 300,000

1938 4 90i; 820 4 901, 820Florida_______ _________ _____________ 1939 48 338, 300 1 18,000 4 207,000

1938 18 215, 556 1 2,650 1 23, 750 5 154, 000Jacksonville . _ ___________________ 1939 6 21,800

1938 1 2,650 1 2,650Miami............ ......... ................. . .... 1939 4 103,000 1 18,000 2 84,000

1938 4 51, 656 2 39, 000Orlando.................... ............................. 1938 2 48, 750 1 23,750 1 25, 000St. Petersburg .......................... __ __ 1939 35 178,500 2 123, 000

1938 11 112, 500 2 90,000West Palm Beach.......... .............. ........ 1939 3 35,000

Georgia_______________________________ 1939 29 314, 720 1 17,000 3 217, 570Atlanta_______________ ____________ 1939 4 201,070 1 17,000 2 182, 570Columbus___________________ ______ 1939 2 66,380Macon_______________ ____________ 1939 1 35,000 1 35,000Savannah__________________________ 1939 22 12, 270

Maryland: Baltimore._______ _________ 1938 2 119,000North Carolina..... ................................ ...... 1939 8 616, 259 4 467, 638 1 17, 500

1938 10 501, 774 9 473, 774 — 1 28, 000Charlotte_____________ ____________ 1939 2 90,100 1 90,000Durham. .. ___________ ____ ____ 1938 5 9,500 5 9, 500Greensboro......................................... 1939 2 304, 637 2 304, 637Raleigh........... ....................................... 1939 4 221, 522 1 73, 001 1 17, 500

1938 5 492, 274 4 464. 274 1 28,000

BU

ILDIN

G

PE

RM

IT SU

RV

EY,

193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 35: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

South Carolina_______ ________________ 1939 4 1.013. 019 2 506,019 295, 800

1 500, 0001938 3 350', 800 21938 1 294,400

1,006,019 7,000

55,000 1,400

34,840 500

1 294, 400 506,019Columbia .......... .... 1939 3 2 1 500, 000

Greenville ____ _____ 1939 11938 1

Spartanburg _______ 1938 1 1 1, 400Virginia: Lynchburg _ _ _ 1939 1West Virginia: Charleston . . . 1938 1

State and cityLodging houses Monasteries Nurseries Nurses’ homes Orphanages Servants’

quartersSummer camps

and cottages

Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation

Total _ _ ____ 1939 3 $22, 500 32,656

1 $7,000 5 $337,591 145,000

3 $35.000 4 $9,500 58 $60, 320 3,0001938 4 1 $29,000 2 8

Delaware: Wilmington _ _ _ . _ . . __ 1939 1 105, 500District of Columbia: Washington_______ 1939

1938Florida ______ _ __________________ 1939 3 22, 500 3 35,000 2 2,800 35 53,000

2,50019384 32,656 7Jacksonville___ ______________ _____ 1939 1 1,800 5 20,000

1938Miami. .......... .................................. . 1939 1 1,000

1938 2 12, 656Orlando . _________ _____ 1938St. Petersburg ___ . _ 1939 3 22, 500

20,00030 33, 000

2,5001938 2 7W est Palm Beaeh 1939 3 35,000

Georgia _ _ _ _ 1939 1 66,230 2 6,700 22 7,220Atlanta _ 1939 1 1,500Columbus____ _____________________ 1939 1 66, 230 1 150Macon _ __ ____ ____ 1939Savannah____ _ _ _________ ________ 1939 1 5,200 21 7, 070

Maryland: Baltimore_____________________ 1938 1 29,000 1 90, 000See footnote at end of table.

fcOCO

RESID

ENTIAL

CON

STRU

CTION

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 36: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 10.— N um ber and permit valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic ^cities, by type of structure, 1989 and 193 8— Continued ^

State and city Year. Lodging houses Monasteries Nurseries Nurses’ homes Orphanages Servants’

quartersSummer camps

and cottages

Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation

North Carolina _ _ _ _ _ _ 19391938193919381939 193919381939 193819381939 1939 193819381939 1938

2 $131,021 1 $100

Charlotte.... ......... _ ___________ _____— —

1 100Durham _____ _ _ _________ ______Greensboro_ __ __ ______________ ____Raleigh. . . . _________________________ 2 131,021

South Carolina _ _ __ 1 $7,000

Charleston._______________________ _1 55,000

Columbia____ ____________ ________G reenville_ ............ ...................... __ 1 7,000Spartanburg _ _ __

1 55,000

Virginia: Lynchburg ___ 1 34, 840West Virginia: Charleston __ _____________ 1 500

1 Includes only cities where permits were issued in 1939 or 1938.

BUILD

ING

PER

MIT

SUR

VEY, 1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 37: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 31D e m o lit io n s

Demolition of nonhousekeeping residential structures occurred in only 9 of the cities in which demolition permits are required as shown in table 11. Of the 12 structures to be demolished, 5 were lodging houses.

T a b l e 11.— N um ber o f nonhousekeeping residential structures fo r which dem olition perm its were issued in 9 South Atlantic cities, 193 9 1

State and city Alltypes Hotels

Lodg­ing

housesNurses’homes

Oldsoldiers’

andsailors’homes

Serv­ants’quar­ters

Surpmercampsand

cottages

Delaware: Wilmington__ ______ 2 1 1District of Columbia: Washington 1 1Florida:

Jacksonville.____ _______ _______ 1 1St. Petersburg .. _ _ __ 1 1

Georgia:Macon . _ __ ______ __ 1 1Savannah. _ ____ ______ ________ 2 1 1

North Carolina:Winston-Salem__ ______ ______ 1 1

Virginia: Newport News. . . . 1 1West Virginia: Charleston . . . 2 2

i Includes only cities where permits were issued for the demolition of nonhousekeeping residential struc­tures in 1939.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 38: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Nonresidential ConstructionType of Structure and Permit Valuations

The total dollar volume of $76,064,000 reported in 1939 for non­residential construction in the 41 cities was nearly one-fourth higher than the $61,703,000 reported in 1938. Increases over 1938 were noted in many of the types of structures— especially public buildings, where valuations rose from $12,160,000 in 1938 to $28,307,000 in 1939, due mainly to such construction in Washington, D. C. Institutions, office buildings, and buildings under the category “ factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other workshops,” all showed substantial gains over 1938. Conversely, the dollar volume reported for several types of structure, such as public works and utilities, and schools, decreased. Table 12 shows the comparison of totals by city and type of structure for nonresidential construction for the 2 years 1938 and 1939.

Nonresidential construction in the District of Columbia accounted for one-half of the total dollar volume of $76,064,000 reported in the 41 South Atlantic cities in 1939. Valuations in Washington amounted to $38,089,000 for 926 buildings in the later year as compared with $27,873,000 for 1,072 structures in 1938. Public buildings valued at $24,935,000 accounted for nearly two-thirds of the valuation in 1939. Included in this classification was a $11,980,000 building planned for the Social Security and Railroad Retirement agencies but used by the War Department; the $2,709,000 General Office Building; and the $2,584,000 Jefferson Memorial; also, the District Municipal Center valued at $4,674,000, and the $997,000 addition to the District Jail. Office buildings, including a privately financed structure with a permit valuation of $3,560,000 but erected for a governmental agency, accounted for 10 percent of the total. Institutions, among them a $609,000 addition at St. Elizabeths Hospital, constituted 9 percent. Federal construction amounted to $19,523,000, or slightly over one- half of the total valuation for the District of Columbia. Virtually no industrial expansion was indicated in the city.

Richmond, the capital of Virginia, ranked second among the 41 cities with valuations amounting to $5,172,000. Institutions and schools made up the bulk of nonresidential construction for the city. Valuations amounted to more than $3,500,000 in Atlanta, Ga., and

32

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 39: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 33

Baltimore, Md., and to $2,376,000 in Wilmington, Del. A dollar volume of more than one million dollars was reported in each of the following cities: Jacksonville and Miami, Fla.; Charlotte, Durham, Raleigh, and Winston-Salem, N. C.; Columbia, S. C .; and Charleston, W. Va.

The most important types of structure in 1939, on the basis of permit valuations in the South Atlantic cities, were public buildings (37 percent of the total value of nonresidential construction), institu­tions (12 percent), schools and stores and other mercantile buildings (11 percent each), public works and utilities (7 per'cent), and buildings in the category “ factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other workshops” (6 percent). Although the high dollar volume for public buildings ($28,307,000) was largely the result of such construction in Washington, D. C., this type of construction was the most important in several other cities. Five buildings (Federal construction) with a total valuation of $870,000 at the Portsmouth Navy Yard, accounted for 94 percent of the total for the city. In Columbia, S. C., a State building to cost $807,000 represented 44 percent of the total. Nearly three-fourths of the value of nonresidential construction in Hagers­town, Md., was accounted for by a city hall.

Authorization was granted in 1939 for 36 institutions to cost $9,124,000. Again more than one-third of this value was reported in Washington. Institutions were valued at $1,889,000 in Richmond, Va., $1,250,000 in Wilmington, Del., and $1,117,000 in Charlotte, N. C., accounting for 37 percent, 53 percent, and 69 percent, respec­tively, of the total for these cities.

Schools were the most important type of nonresidential con­struction in St. Petersburg, Fla.; Cumberland, M d .; Greensboro, N. C .; Charleston, S. C.; and Charleston, W. Va.

In the Florida cities, stores and other mercantile buildings were of first importance and accounted for 37 percent of the total for seven cities.

Considerable industrial expansion was indicated in the Georgia municipalities during 1939, partially the result of the migration of industry to the South. Permits were issued for the construction of factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other workshops with a volume of $2,163,000 accounting for 42 percent of the total for the Georgia cities. More than one-half ($1,874,000) of the reported valuation in Atlanta was for structures of this type.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 40: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 12.— N um ber and perm it valuation of nonrevidential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type ofstructure, 1939 and 1938

00

[For more detailed analysis of data, see appendix table A]

State and city YearTotal

Amusement and recreation

placesChurches

Factories, bakeries, ice

plants, laundries, and other workshops

Garages, publicGarages, private, when separate from dwelling 1

Gasoline and service stations Institutions

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Total__________________ 1939 10,318 $76, 063, 542 91 $2,616, 272 99 $1,379,006 145 $4,391,853 92 $748, 592 6,671 $1,361,304 316 $1, 233, 453 36 $9,123, 5311938 8,382 61, 703, 284 92 2,835,611 71 1,043, 460 130 3, 454,039 59 416,893 5,310 1, 542, 645 278 1,089,926 24 2, 351, 924

Delaware: Wilmington__ 1939 175 2, 375, 621 1 44,000 5 71,980 9 35,125 129 36, 398 10 46,600 1 1, 250, 0001938 110 807, 879 2 201,000 1 12,450 2 27,500 3 14, 500 69 23, 449 13 49,900

District of Columbia:Washington________ __ 1939 926 38, 088,941 7 639, 500 4 113, 000 5 126, 500 15 262, 500 640 167, 561 20 136, 300 7 3, 302, 259

1938 1,072 27,873, 277 6 453, 200 7 426,000 9 159,989 4 110,000 642 498,445 19 106,880 3 428,850Florida________ *______ 1939 3,297 4, 585,974 23 94,363 28 355, 564 18 117,980 17 68,950 2, 086 405,417 56 232,055 5 41, 500

1938 2,612 6,133,817 26 332, 263 17 200,820 33 845,867 15 95,093 1,738 365, 076 57 206, 598 5 146, 460Jacksonville_________ 1939 1, 283 1, 203, 774 5 12,000 ' 11 142,450 8 57,000 6 13,100 1,038 177, 025 19 82, 500 1 5,000

1938 963 1,897, 877 7 140,493 7 62, 400 16 766, 977 5 24, 732 771 134, 610 10 31,800Miami.. _ _______ 1939 827 1, 925, Oil 8 47,950 9 107, 414 1 8, 480 4 25,150 243 77, 582 9 52, 505 3 30, 500

1938 577 1, 851, 888 11 73,900 3 22, 670 8 23,890 6 45, 761 243 78, 881 19 78,117 4 55, 500Orlando____________ 1939 151 203, 495 3 10, 613 2 7, 000 100 31,151 3 12, 500 1 6,000

1938 203 355, 750 2 88,000 3 28, 000 158 42, 604 6 20, 500Pensacola_________ _ 1939 87 100, 296 4 30, 000 42 4,811 4 21, 900

1938 80 810, 583 1 1, 250 1 3,000 35 3, 010 5 17,900St. Petersburg_____ _ 1939 592 503, 690 5 22,300 3 74, 500 1 1, 500 3 16, 200 494 82, 795 4 15, 500

1938 448 661, 087 4 25,870 5 112, 500 1 5, 000 1 1,000 375 76, 794 3 9, 600Tampa_____________ 1939 235 249, 267 1 500 2 14,000 2 14, 000 4 14, 500 98 14, 662 12 28, 350

1938 197 367, 065 4 19, 000 1 20, 000 74 • 9,915 12 37, 581West Palm Beach___ 1939 122 400, 441 1 1,000 3 17, 200 71 17, 391 5 18, 800

1938 144 189, 567 2 4,000 1 2,000 2 3, 600 82 19, 262 2 11,100 1 90,960Georgia________________ 1939 927 5, 211, 678 13 495, 259 22 305, 712 27 2,163, 285 8 124,950 418 57, 370 56 190, 725 5 251, 718

1938 579 1, 662, 305 14 153,153 8 39, 990 11 70, 316 4 20, 900 224 30, 686 30 124,891 1 79, 318Atlanta_____________ 1939 427 3, 679, 754 6 201, 708 12 219,147 18 1. 873, 585 7 109, 950 150 16, 954 41 144, 775 3 131, 718

1938 334 824,112 9 119, 653 5 30, 490 4 35, 616 2 12,000 119 14, 551 21 93,174 1 79, 318Augusta.. _________ 1939 84 464, 974 2 157, 200 1 46,000 31 5, 693 2 2, 850

1938 36 538, 415 1 500 I id, ooo 1 7,800 14 4,285

BUILD

ING

PER

MIT

SUR

VEY, 193 9

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 41: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

Columbus........ ..... 1939 105 602.805 1 118, 251 4 16,100 3 245,000 39 2,918 3 20,800 1 30,0001938 96 136,491 2 30,000 2 6, 500 2 17,000 47 5,392 2 3,500

Macon ....................... 1939 41 91, 559 2 4,000 3 28, 500 11 3, 735 4 12,6001938 46 87,875 2 3,000 1 1,000 15 1, 743 3 9, 500

Savannah................. . 1939 270 372,586 4 18,100 3 20, 465 3 16, 200 1 15,000 187 28, 070 6 9,700 1 90,0001938 67 75,412 1 3,000 3 6, 700 1 1,100 29 4, 715 4 18, 717

Maryland_____ _______ 1939 2,347 4. 485,791 8 117,000 1 7,000 30 618,853 10 58, 310 2,068 449,691 32 137,800 3 250,0001938 1,606 5, 850,391 10 196, 300 4 54, 000 17 548, 525 11 43, 600 1,361 360, 633 32 158,600 5 545,000

Baltimore__________ 1939 2,187 3, 583,742 8 117,000 1 7, 000 29 617,853 9 55,910 1,960 427, 066 26 116, 500 3 250,0001938 1, 427 5,711,172 1C 196, 300 a 51,000 15 523,025 10 41,800 1, 238 335,144 25 136,800 5 545,000

Cumberland..___ . 1939 70 474,015 1 1,000 1 2,400 47 9,100 3 9, 5001938 61 31,813 1 1,000 49 9,418 5 19,000

Hagerstown____ ____ 1939 90 428,034 61 13,525 3 11,8001938 118 107' 406 l 3,000 1 24,500 1 1,800 74 16,071 2 2,800

North Carolina......... ...... 1939 716 7,371, 694 19 829,950 23 337, 930 23 808,654 10 95, 200 317 40,911 45 131,900 10 1,935, 5581938 715 6,465, 962 12 390, 276 12 81,000 26 792,432 9 74,400 323 52, 651 37 153,900 6 364, 587

Asheville................. . 1939 55 504, 799 1 240,000 1 6, 500 1 100,000 2 5, 000 33 3,3741938 77 341,675 4 46, 500 2 16’ 800 3 24,000 26 8,385 8 28, 500

Charlotte................... 1939 92 1,612, 757 1 22,000 3 71, 500 10 130, 500 2 4,000 13 1,390 14 49,900 3 1,116, 6421938 73 653, 228 1 98,000 3 61,000 2 17,000 20 4,900 7 29, 550 2 104,160

Durham___________ 1939 49 1,468, 937 3 434, 500 4 59,160 3 51,454 3 25, 700 5 925 5 15, 450 1 400,0001938 45 1,908, 726 4 147,900 2 10, 200 5 563,337 4 1,510 3 9, 500

Greensboro_________ 1939 67 338, 405 1 5, 700 1 32,000 3 9,500 19 1,965 6 17,0001938 67 770, 712 1 3,000 3 35,000 2 27,500 1 3,000 19 2, 760 3 10,000 I 15,000

High Point_________ 1939 127 122, 641 1 12, 750 6 46,370 1 1,200 84 12,303 2 5,5001938 137 332,568 2 94,876 2 5,500 9 28,825 76 11, 702 1 900

Raleigh__________ _ 1939 73 1,927, 208 1 40,000 4 93, 600 1 1,000 1 1,000 16 2,715 2 4,000 6 418,9161938 88 1,644, 591 1 6, 500 3 30, 500 26 3,668

5405 25,500 2 185,427

Wilmington________ 1939 42 379, 343 2 9,000 2 25,000 1 56,000 8 6 20, 5001938 35 242,000 1 1,000 2 5l’ 000 1 12,000 8 1,380 2 20,000 I 60,000

W inston- Salem....... .. 1939 211 1,017, 604 11 75,000 2 19,800 2 490,000 1 3, 500 139 17,699 10 19, 5501938 193 572,462 1 6,000 2 30’ 270 2 18,400 144 18,346 8 29,950

South Carolina____ _____ 1939 273 3,446,217 2 23,600 8 87,000 4 35,701 3 11,000 91 18 637 21 71,9001938 239 2,371, 534 5 * 446, 290 9 105, 200 6 36’ 890 2 10,000 80 18 350 24 86,350 i 115,000

Charleston__________ 1939 66 750, 580 1 600 5 78,000 20 7,639 5 18,0001938 45 1,066, 244 2 316,000 2 3,000 12 1,305 4 7,575

Columbia___________ 1939 84 1,822,155 1 23,000 2 13,200 2 9,000 24 3, 728 8 24,0001938 67 559, 288 1 108, 790 5 70, 200 5 27’ 390 2 1 0 ’ 0 0 0 12 l’, 758 6 25,200

Greenville__________ 1939 54 338,081 2 22, 501 9 1,405 6 23,9001938 i 69 398, 660 1 15,000 1 9,500 30 11,980 7 26,175 i 115,666

Spartanburg________ | 1939 1 69 535, 401 3 9,000 1 2,000 38 5 865 2 6,0001938 1 58 347,3421 1 6,500 2 32,0001 26 3,307 7 27,400

See footnote at end of table.00Oi

NO

NR

ESIDEN

TIAL CO

NSTR

UCTIO

N

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 42: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 12.— N u m b e r an d p erm it va lu ation o f n o n r evidential structures f o r w hich b u ild in g p erm its w ere issu e d in S o u th A tla n tic c itie s , b y typ e o fstructure, 1 9 8 9 and 1 9 3 8 — Continued

[For more detailed analysis of data, see appendix table A]

CO05

State and city YearTotal

Amusement and recreation

placesChurches

Factories, bakeries, ice

plants, laundries, and other workshops

Garages, publicGarages, private,

when separate from dwelling 1

Gasoline and service stations Institutions

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

•Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Num­ber

Valua­tion

Virginia................... ...... - 1939 1,107 $7,684,615 13 $278,650 10 $166,300 25 $357,800 13 $71, 257 545 $91,865 58 $219,973 4 $1,998, 0681938 976 9,027,928 13 314,129 7 85,500 13 771,420 8 35,400 592 108, 904 33 100,157 2 502, 733

Lynchburg ________ 1939 68 282, 224 2 169,000 1 2,000 30 5, 005 2 10, 250 1 19, 5041938 61 33,886 1 1, 500 34 3, 981 2 9, 720

Newport News______ 1939 59 112, 263 1 45,000 1 15,600 3 8, 700 14 1, 734 5 15,8001938 109 73,119 46 7, 690 2 7, 500

Norfolk _______ 1939 324 731,430 2 44,950 4 111, 200 6 157, 500 215 35,954 16 44, 548 2 89,0751938 328 4, 253, 264 2 105,831 1 3,500 4 342, 450 221 47, 799 19 47, 384

Petersburg ............. 1939 35 187,825 1 1,500 3 16,100 16 2,140 5 23,8001938 21 329, 403 3 88, 520 1 2,000 7 1, 265 1 1,200

Portsmouth ............. 1939 48 925,986 2 24,000 1 1, 500 27 3, 415 3 17,8501938 44 2,196, 366 2 118,494 1 23,000 1 286, 700 26 1, 750

Richmond__________ 1939 391 5,172,035 5 5,700 8 133, 750 7 22,850 122 23, 620 22 83,850 1 1,889, 4891938 252 1,365,572 9 89,804 3 45,000 3 33, 500 4 13, 600 137 27,673 7 24,678 1 8,000

Roanoke _________ - 1939 182 272,852 3 14,000 1 12,000 4 40, 250 6 48, 407 121 19,997 5 23,8751938 161 776,318 2 14,000 1 18, 750 3 19,800 121 18, 746 2 9, 675 1 494, 733

West Virginia................... 1939 550 2,813, Oil 5 93,950 3 6,500 8 91,100 7 21, 300 377 93, 454 18 66, 200 1 94,4281938 473 1, 510,191 4 349,000 6 38, 500 13 201,100 3 13,000 281 84, 451 33 102, 650 1 169,976

Charleston _______ 1939 215 1, 251, 099 1 35,000 2 3, 500 5 49,100 3 12, 200 161 39,975 3 13,5001938 174 602, 240 2 299,000 2 23,000 5 137, 500 1 2,000 98 32, 490 15 54, 300

Clarksburg_________ 1939 47 253,928 1 2, 500 29 7,488 3 3, 7001938 60 43, 703 1 10,000 2 13, 600 32 6, 500 3 6, 000

Huntington................ 1939 190 774, 254 1 2,000 1 3,000 1 17, 000 129 21, 441 8 29,0001938 151 621,553 1 15,000 1 3,500 4 24,000 100 27,466 5 9,500 1 169,976

Parkersburg________ 1939 54 376,290 2 30,950 2 4,000 31 11,145 1 12, 000 1 94,4281938 49 130, 550 1 35,000 2 2,000 1 25,000 1 3,000 26 6,175 6 22, 500

Wheeling___________ 1939 44 157, 440 1 26,000 2 25,000 1 2, 600 27 13,405 3 8,0001938 39 112,145 1 1,000 1 8,000 25 11,820 4 10, 350

1 Permits issued for dwelling units in many instances included the cost of detached garages. In order to show separate data for dwelling units and such garages, these com­posite figures were broken down by applying the ratios derived from permits giving separate valuations for dwelling units and detached garages.

BUILD

ING

PER

MIT

SUR

VEY, 1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 43: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 12.— N um ber and permit valuation of nonresidential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type ofstructure, 1939 and 1938— Continued

[For more detailed analysis of data, see appendix table A]

State and city Year

Office buildings, including banks

Public buildings, city, county,

State, and Federal

Public works and utilities Schools Sheds, poultry

houses, etc.Stables and

barnsStores and other

mercantile buildings

All other non­residential structures

Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation

Total.-.________________ 1939 27 $5,046,095 47 $28,307,156 95 $5, 298,001 52 $8,107, 599 1,430 $356, 579 20 $8, 766 862 $8,004,183 335 $81,1521938 27 2,031,109 33 12,160,266 69 6,036, 980 62 19, 979,668 1,368 362, 991 20 18,200 825 8,321, 642 14 57, 930

Delaware: Wilmington__ 1939 2 467,000 1 23, 748 1 27,910 1 500 15 372,3601938 1 15, 000 2 169, 355 5 3,150 12 291,575

District of Columbia:Washington 1939 3 3, 625,000 15 24, 934, 686 10 1, 730, 507 10 2, 008,992 121 36, 776 64 1,002, 500 5 2,860

1938 5 352, 500 2 6, 061, 563 12 2, 515, 778 8 14,642,820 247 26, 740 107 2,081,742 1 8, 770

Florida..... ......... .......... . 1939 4 345, 200 4 147.858 21 497, 976 4 338,000 469 149,012 2 700 258 1, 718,957 302 72, 4421938 2 112, 000 9 1,121.682 8 271,159 7 470,075 466 153,105 3 1,095 222 1,791,924 4 20,600

Jacksonville............ 1939 1 7, 500 1 40, 361 12 386, 830 1 15,000 95 39, 776 1 100 40 219,750 44 5,3821938 4 237. 481 93 22, 654 2 1,020 47 474,910 1 800

Miami __ 1939 1 325, 000 2 52,119 4 98, 346 2 123,000 180 62,621 115 849,384 246 64, 9601938 2 112,000 2 204,269 3 23,121 1 45,000 168 79,751 104 989, 228 3 19,800

Orlando _______ 1939 1 5,700 15 10, 746 26 119, 7851938 1 80,000 18 5,360 15 91,286

Pensacola .. .......... . 1939 1 7,000 25 2,735 11 33. 8501938 1 342, 273 6 425,075 28 7,275 3 10.800

St. Petersburg_____ 1939 4 11, 500 1 200, 000 53 10,145 1 600 23 68, 6501938 3 363,288 44 14,600 1 75 11 52, 360

Tampa____________ 1939 1 1,300 79 13, 270 26 147,935 10 7501938 2 131,852 1 10, 557 79 12,120 24 126,040

West Palm Beach___ 1939 1 55,378 22 9, 719 17 279,603 2 1,3501938 36 11,345 18 47,300

00-^1

NO

NR

ESID

EN

TIAL

CON

STRU

CTION

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 44: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 1 2 .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonresidential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o fstructure, 1989 and 1988— Continued

[For more detailed anlaysis of data, see appendix table A]

0000

State and city Year

Office buildings, including banks

Public buildings, city, county,

State, and Federal

Public works and utilities Schools Sheds, poultry

houses, etc.Stables and

barnsStores and other

mercantile buildings

All other non­residential structures

Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation Num­ber Valuation Num­

ber Valuation

Georgia______ ____ - ........ 1939 1 $11,750 4 $134,474 7 $304,199 2 $78,345 245 $47,484 4 $2,205 104 $1,042,017 11 $2,1851938 4 490,800 4 40,022 4 119,890 165 38, 314 3 270 106 450, 755 1 3,000

Atlanta_____________ 1939 1 11,750 3 52,000 2 78, 345 116 24,377 2 125 65 814, 920 1 4001938 2 117,000 2 19,022 105 22. 693 2 120 62 280,475

Augusta _ _ _ 1939 2 229,825 29 4,391 1 1,980 9 16, 200 7 8351938 2 373,800 1 20,000 1 68,000 8 1,830 7 52,200

Columbus.......... .... 1939 1 86,885 42 7,051 10 75, 750 1 501938 2 24, 500 25 4,049 1 150 12 42,400 1 3,000

Macon_____ _____ _ 1939 1 21,374 15 4,850 5 16,5001938 1 1,000 1 27,390 10 4,172 13 40,070

Savannah___ ____ _ 1939 3 47, 589 1 1,000 43 6,815 1 100 15 118, 647 2 9001938 17 5, 570 12 35,610

Maryland___________ 1939 6 77,500 3 723, 539 14 380, 700 5 708, 525 69 19, 786 2 1,575 96 935, 5121938 6 529,609 4 992,406 9 398, 746 3 667,052 63 27, 710 4 15,000 74 1,288, 825 3 24,385

Baltimore_________ 1939 6 77, 500 2 404,800 12 367, 700 2 409, 900 42 12,226 2 1, 575 85 718, 7121938 6 529,609 4 992,406 9 398,746 2 632,052 30 20,930 3 14,900 64 1,269,075 3 24,385

Cumberland_______ 1939 3 298,625 10 3.890 5 149, 5001938 4 895 2 1,500

Hagerstown_______ 1939 1 318,739 2 13,000 17 3, 670 6 67, 3001938 1 35,000 29 5,885 1 100 8 18,250

North Carolina_________ 1939 3 228, 245 5 315, 546 10 523,391 13 1,050,142 130 29,844 4 185 102 1,043,338 2 9001938 5 248, 500 3 560,355 9 558, 421 15 2,010,477 131 35, 707 5 85 122 1,143,171

Asheville___________ 1939 10 1,025 7 148,9001938 1 150,000 21 5,180 1 10 11 62,300

Charlotte____ ______ 1939 1 5,245 1 4,800 30 8, 380 14 198,4001938 1 6,000 16 6,632 21 325,986

Durham.................. . 1939 1 56,000 6 349,878 8 3,370 10 72,5001938 1 124,079 4 898,000 1 2,000 21 152,200

Greensboro_________ 1939 1 18,000 1 38,000 1 5,000 2 156,627 15 3,113 1 100 15 51,200 1 200! 1938 5 441,419 18 3, 433 14 229,600

BU

ILDIN

G

PE

RM

IT SU

RV

EY,

1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 45: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

1939 19 1,483 2 35 1 1 42,300 1 7001938 1 47,600 30 4,265 3 50 13 138,8501939 1 205,000 1 202,048 4 295, 591 1 325,000 14 7, 250 2 1 331,0881938 3 92; 500 2 535 355 2 254 200 2 409, 514 24 8,442 18 92,9851939 1 4 ’ 500 2 143’ 000 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 1,603 8 51,2001938 1 25 000 1 21,600 1 1 1,920 7 48,1001939 1 14,998 2 75,000 2 150, 637 24 3,620 1 50 16 147, 7501938 5 132,542 3 239, 944 1 0 3,835 1 25 17 93,150

1939 1 6 , 0 0 0 2 807 262 9 288 262 1 2 1 , 550,338 52 17,620 2 150 6 6 528,7471938 3 71,500 2 87,885 6 302,954 1 0 845,433 45 10,147 46 235, 535

Charleston _____ 1939 1 5,000 5 588, 986 18 4, 505 1 1 47,8501938 3 234,000 4 489,652 14 2, 712 4 1 2 , 0 0 0

Columbia -- -- 1939 1 6 , 0 0 0 2 807,262 2 702,000 2 2 6,765 2 0 227,2001938 3 7l'500 1 60,000 1 30,000 1 2 2, 250 19 152,2001939 4 55,822 1 37,000 1 0 5, 550 1 50 2 1 191,8531938 2 87,885 2 80,275 13 4,045 1 2 48,8001939 4 227, 440 4 222,352 2 800 1 100 14 61,8441938 2 8,954 3 245, 506 6 1,140 11 22, 535

Virginia....... ........... ......... 1939 4 59,400 6 892,686 12 887,852 3 1,662,357 281 33,419 4 3,651 116 958, 627 13 2,7101938 4 681,000 8 2,830, 575 19 1, 780, 545 7 915, 710 173 49,405 3 1,050 94 851,400

Lynchburg_______ 1939 1 5,000 20 4,140 3 3,525 8 63,8001938 1 7,000 1 1,300 17 1,635 2 550 3 8,200

Newport News____ 1939 1 22,400 33 1,029 1 2,0001938 1 15,000 2 10,000 52 9,629 6 23,300

Norfolk..... ................ 1939 1 8,000 32 4,740 1 126 32 232,627 13 2,7l61938 3 2,456, 540 2 135,100 3 693, 730 50 17,355 1 500 22 403,075

Petersburg 1939 1 20,000 1 22,615 1 6,095 4 3, 575 3 92,0001938 2 89,785 2 136,008 3 325 2 10,300

Portsmouth______ 1939 5 870,071 6 1,050 4 8,1001938 1 262,250 2 1,452,000 1 23,797 7 3,875 3 24,500

Richmond_______ 1939 11 881, 757 2 1,657,357 159 14,613 54 459,0491938 4 681,000 11 89,734 1 62,175 26 12, 825 46 277, 583

Roanoke______ ___ 1939 1 9,000 27 4,272 14 101,0511938 1 92,411 18 3,761 12 104,442

West Virginia___________ 1939 3 226,000 7 327, 357 11 657,204 3 710.900 62 22,138 2 300 41 402,125 2 551938 2 36,000 8 308,211 73 18, 713 2 700 42 186, 715 5 1,175

Charleston ________ 1939 4 112,000 2 204,624 3 710,900 24 10, 550 7 59,7501938 1 11,000 29 6,085 16 35.690 5 1,175

Clarksburg_______ . 1939 1 200,000 5 435 6 39, 750 2 551938 18 1,103 4 6,500

Huntington .. _ _ 1939 1 180, 722 7 418, 700 26 9,091 1 50 15 93,2501938 1 25,000 8 308,211 19 9,700 2 700 9 28, 500

Parkersburg _____ 1939 1 16,000 2 33,880 7 2,062 1 250 6 171, 5751938 6 1,375 6 35,500

Wheeling________ _ 1939 1 10,000 2 34,635 7 37,8001938 1 450 7 80,525

00CO

NO

NR

ESID

EN

TIAL

CO

NSTR

UC

TION

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 46: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

40 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

D e m o lit io n s

Baltimore, Md., and Washington, D. C., reported the largest number of demolitions of nonresidential structures, as well as of family-dwelling units. One hundred and twenty-one structures were razed by private wrecking operations in Baltimore and 104 in Washington. In addi­tion, permits were issued for the demolition of 3 nonresidential struc­tures at the site of Edgar Allen Poe Homes housing project at Baltimore.

Stores and other mercantile buildings and private detached garages were the types of structures most frequently demolished as indicated by permits issued in the 30 cities where demolition data are available.

In table 13 detailed information is presented concerning the number of nonresidential structures, by type of structure and city, for which demolition permits were issued in 1939.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 47: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 13.— N um ber of nonrevidential structures for which demolition permits were issued in 30 South Atlantic cities, 1939 1

State and city Alltypes

Amuse­mentand

recrea­tion

places

Churches

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other

work­shops

Ga­rages,public

Garages,private,when

separatefrom

dwelling

Gaso­lineandserv­icesta­tions

Insti­tutions

Officebuild­ings,

includ­ing

banks

Publicbuild­ings—city,

county,State,and

Federal

Publicworksandutil­ities

SchoolsSheds,poul­try

houses,etc.

Stablesand

barns

Storesand

othermer­

cantilebuild­ings

Othernonresi-dentialstruc­tures

Typeof

struc­turenotre­

ported

Delaware: Wilmington. . 72 7 5 18 1 2 1 6 1 31District of Columbia:

Washington___. . . . . 104 3 1 1 41 3 4 3 8 1 26 2 4

Florida:Jacksonville_________ 93 1 2 43 1 1 1 1 0 3 7 24Miami. . __________ 27 1 1 3 6 1 0 6Pensacola___________ 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 9St. Petersburg_______ 1 1 2 1 4 4Tampa_____________ 7 1 3 3West Palm Beach____ 3 1 2

Georgia:Atlanta_____________ 30 1 1 28Augusta____________ 32 I 2 2 1 1 3 1 24Columbus_________ _ 17 2 1 2 6 6Macon______________ 2 1 1Savannah................. 17 1 3 2 1 2 8

Maryland:Baltimore................ 124 1 4 1 0 5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 13 48 5

Private wrecking operations____ 1 2 1 1 3 9 5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 13 47 5

Edgar Allen Poe Homes (U. S. H. A .)____________ 3 1 1 1

Cumberland.... ......... 7 1 3 3Hagerstown_________ 3 I 1 1

North Carolina:Charlotte___ ________ 2 1 1Greensboro_______ 1 1Winston-Salem______ 33 5 8 1 1 6 1 1 1

South Carolina:Charleston_____ .. 2 0 1 2 4 1 0 3Greenville_____ _ _. 3 I 1 1

See footnotes at end of table. I—1

NO

NR

ESID

EN

TIAL

CON

STRU

CTION

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 48: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

T a b l e 13.— N um ber o f nonresidential structures for which demolition perm its were issued in SO South Atlantic cities, 198 9 1— Continued

State and city Alltypes

Amuse­mentand

recrea­tion

places

Churches

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other

work­shops

Ga­rages,public

Garages,private,when

separatefrom

dwelling

Gaso­lineandserv­icesta­tions

Insti­tutions

Officebuild­

ings,includ­

ingbanks

Publicbuild­ings—city,

county,State,and

Federal

Publicworksandutil­ities

SchoolsSheds,poul-

h tr yhouses,etc.

Stablesand

barns

Storesand

othermer­

cantilebuild­ings

Othernonresi­dentialstruc­tures

Typeof

struc­turenotre­

ported

Virginia:Newport News______ 49 17 1 29 2Norfolk... . _______ 67 1 3 4 2 19 4 1 1 1 1 3 27Petersburg ._ ______ 11 3 8Portsmouth. . . . 31 1 2 4 1 5 18Richmond__________ 90 1 5 2 59 1 1 7 3 11Roanoke ___. . . . . . 10 2 2 1 2 3

West Virginia:Charleston. ____ . . . 59 1 1 6 7 5 38Clarksburg__ _____ 2 2Wheeling________. . . 6 1 1 1 1 2

1 Demolition permits were not required in Asheville, Durham, High Point, Raleigh, 2 3 retaining walls and 1 smokestack,and Wilmington, N. C.; Columbia and Spartanburg, S. C.; and Huntington and Parkers- 3 Fence,burg, W. Va.; and such data were not available in Orlando, Fla. ,and Lynchburg, Va.

BU

ILDIN

G

PE

RM

IT SU

RV

EY,

1939

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 49: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

A ppendixTable A shows detailed information for nonhousekeeping residential

and nonresidential construction in South Atlantic cities. This table indicates the type of material and permit valuation for individual structures in each of the 41 cities.T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non­

residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified m aterials, 1939

DELAW AREWILMINGTON

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping residen-tial structures- ______ ____ 2 $401, 500

Association buildings: Struc-tural steel: Concrete facing... 1 296,000

Nurses’ homes: Stone__ _ ._ 1 105, 500Total nonresidential structures- 175 2, 375, 621Amusement and recreation

places: Structural steel: Con­crete facing________________ 1 44,000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops.. _ . _ _ _ _ 5 71,980

Frame_____ _______ 1 3, 400Brick_____________ _____ 2 59, 900

1 55, 0001 4,900

Stone____ _______ . 1 6,180Metal____ _____ _ _____ 1 2,500

Garages, public______ ____ . . . 9 35,125Brick____________________ 3 18, 000

1 7,5001 6,0001 4, 500

Concrete___ _ _________ 5 12, 2501 6,0001 2, 2501 1,5001 1,5001 1,000

Structural steel: Concrete facing__________________ 1 4,875

Garages, private, when sepa­36, 398rate from dwelling L. . _ 129

Brick____________________ 86 22, 593Stucco________________ - 2 480Brick and stone__________ 1 1,500Concrete_______________ 37 11, 375Tile_____________________ 3 450

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service stations:Concrete_____ __________ 10 $46,600

1 7,5001 6, 8001 6,0001 5,5001 4,8001 4,5001 4,0001 4,0001 2,000

Institutions: Reinforced con­ 1 1, 500crete: Brick facing_______ __ 1 1, 250, 000

Office buildings, includingbanks_____________ ______ 2 467,000

Brick... _____ . ______ 1 17,000Structural steel: Brick fac­

ing— 1 450,000Public buildings, city, county,

State and Federal: Brick 1 23, 748Public works and utilities: Con­

crete__ _ . . . . . . . . . . . 1 27, 910Sheds, poultry houses, etc.:

Brick.. _ . . . . . . . ._ _ 1 500Stores and other mercantile

buildings_____________ _ . . . 15 372,360Brick_______ _____ _______ 4 269, 500

1 150,0001 90, 0001 20,0001 9,500

Stucco___________________ 1 2, 000Concrete_____ _______ 4 20, 360

1 11,0001 4,8001 3, 4001 1,160

Metal----- --------------------- 3 46,0001 36,0001 9,0001 1.000

Structural steel: Brick fac­ing— 1 25,000

Glass_______________ ____ 1 3,000Not reported____________ 1 6, 500

See footnotes at end of table. 271711°—42-----4 43

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 50: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

44 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 193 9

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and n on - residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified m aterials, 1 93 9—'Continued

DISTRICT OF COLUM BIA

WASHINGTON

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping resi-dential structures,-. - _ _ 2 $550,000

Dormitories: Reinforced con-crete: Brick facing ____ 1 250,000

Homes for the aged: Reinforcedconcrete: Brick f a c i n g _ _ 1 300,000

Total nonresidential structures 926 38,088,941Amusement and recreation

places- __________ ______ 7 639,500Brick________ ___________ 4 154,500

1 100,0001 30,0001 17,0001 7,500

Brick and stone__________ 1 75,000Reinforced concrete:

Brick facing ________ 1 60,000Brick and stone facing __ 1 350,000

Churches___________________ 4 113,000Frame.......... ........................ 2 8,000

1 4,0001 4,000

Brick.................................... 2 105,0001 95,0001 10,000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops _ _______ . ______ 5 126,500

Brick____________________ 4 125,0001 85,0001 30,0001 5,0001 5,000

Concrete______________ _ _ 1 1,500Garages, public________ _____ 15 262, 500

Brick .................... ............... 14 258, 5001 100,0001 38,0001 24,0001 20,0001 20,0001 10,0001 10,0001 10,0001 8,0001 8,0001 4,0001 2,5001 2,0001 2,000

Stone__________ _____ _ _ 1 4,000Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling 1________ 640 167, 561Frame. _ _ __ ________ 157 32, 360Brick_______________ 308 102,028Stucco,_ 4 925Frame and stucco . _ 5 •1, 725

See footnotes at end of table.

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Garages, private, etc.—Con.Brick and frame_____ _ __ 2 $700Stone and frame______ 1 600Concrete_________________ 23 7,730Metal____ _________ _ 130 18,508Tile_____________________ 2 600Not reported-------------------- 8 2,385

Gasoline and service stations__ 20 136,300Brick____________________ 15 107,800

1 25,0001 10,0001 10,0001 7,5001 7,5001 7,0001 6,4001 6,0001 5,4001 5,0001 5,0001 4,0001 3,5001 3,5001 2,000

Brick and stucco_________ 1 6,500Concrete....... .............. ........ 3 15,000

1 7,0001 5,0001 3,000

Tile_____________________ 1 7,000Institutions____________ ____ 7 3,302, 259

Reinforced concrete: Brickfacing-------------- ------------ 3 1, 596, 450

1 800,0002 1 609,000

1 187,450Structural steel:

Brick facing_____ ___ 1 87,066Brick and stone facing __ 3 1,618,743

1 821,1611 447, 5821 350, 000

Office buildings, includingbanks __ ___'___ ______ 3 3,625, 000

Brick____________________ 1 15,000Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing_________________ 1 50, 000Structural steel: Brick and

stone facing_______ _ _ 1 3, 560,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal_____ ___ 15 24,934,686Brick....... ......................... 6 226,682

2 1 120,8922 1 34,9852 1 25, 000

1 21,4831 14,833

*1 9,489

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 51: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 45T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 939— Continued

DISTRICT OF COLUM BIA— Continued

WASHINGTON— Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public buildings, etc.—Con. Reinforced concrete:

Brick facing_________ 1 $996, 928Cement facing________ a 1 16,434Stone facing--------------- 1 482, 713

Structural steel:Brick facing. ------------- *1 1,070, 521Stone facing------ --------- 3 7,452,823

1 4,674, 3022 1 2, 584,2002 1 194,321

Brick and stone facing.. 2 14,688,5852 1 11,980,0852 1 2, 708, 500

Public works and utilities_____ 10 1, 730,507Brick....................... ............. 6 236, 274

1 183,9941 34,0001 7, 7801 3, 5001 3,5001 3, 500

Concrete........................... 1 350,000Reinforced concrete:

Stone facing__________ 1 275,000Brick and stone facing. _ 1 700, 000

Structural steel___ ______ a 1 169. 233Schools______ . _______ . . . 10 2,008, 992

Brick.................................... 7 994, 8921 250,0001 207,0001 176, 9771 159, 7861 159,1291 33, 0001 9,000

Reinforced concrete:Brick facing............... 1 111,200Brick and stone facing.. 2 902, 900

1 769, 9001 133,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1— 121 36, 776Frame.. . . . _______ . _ 29 7,380

12,575Brick____________ _______ 16Concrete_____________ _ 6 11,900Metal_____ ______. . . . 63 4,261Not reported_____________ 1 7 660

See footnotes at end of table.

?ype of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Itores and other mercantile buildings_________ ______ 64 $1,002,500

Frame.......... ........................ 1 850Brick.................................... 56 626,900

1 100,0001 90,0001 35,0001 27,0001 25,0001 25,0001 17,0001 15,0001 15,0001 15,0001 15,0001 14, 0001 12,0001 12,0001 12,0001 10,0001 10,0001 10,0001 9,0001 8,0001 8,0001 8, 0001 8,000

32 15,0001 6,0001 6,0001 5,0001 5,0001 5,0001 5,0003 4 18, 000

3 2 8,0001 4,0001 4,0001 4,0001 4,0001 4, 0001 3,6001 3, 5001 3, 5001 3, 0001 3,0001 2, 8001 2,7001 2, 5001 2, 0001 2, 0001 1,5001 1,5001 1, 3001 1,000

Stone_____ . . . __________ 1 14,000Brick and stone__________ 1 31, 750Concrete...... ........................ 1 4,000

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 52: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

46 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1 9 39

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non - residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

DISTRICT OF COLUM BIA— Continued

WASHINGTON—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores, etc.—Continued All other, etc.—ContinuedReinforced concrete: Brick Retaining walls- . - _____ 4 $1,860

facing ________________ 4 $325,000— Brick__________ __ ___ 2 1,560

1 150, 0001 65, 000 1 1, 3801 60,000 1 1801 50, 000

Stone__ . . ______ __ 1 75All other nonresidential struc­ Concrete____ ____ ____ 1 225

tures______ ______ ________ 5 2,860Smokestacks: Brick ___ 1 1,000

FLORIDA

JACKSONVILLE

Total nonhousekeeping residen-tial structures___ _ __ _ 6 $21,800

Servants’ quarters: Brick ve-neer._ - ____ . . . 1 1,800

Summer camps and cottages__ 5 20,000Brick veneer _____ ______ 3 4 18,000Concrete___ _ ____ 1 2,000

Total nonresidential structures.. 1,283 1, 203, 774Am usem ent and recreation

places... _________________ 5 12,000Frame________ ________ 2 7,000

1 5,0001 2,000

Concrete___ _________ 3 2 3,000Not reported..__________ 1 2,000

Churehes___ . . . . __ ._ ._ 11 142,450Frame_______________ 6 33, 500

1 22,0001 4,0001 2,5001 2,5001 1,5001 1,000

Brick_______________ ____ 1 67,500Stone___ ______________ 2 14,000

1 10,0001 4,000

Brick and stone_________ . 1 25,000Not reported_______ _____

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­

1 2,450

shops___ . _____ 8 57,000Brick____ ______________ 2 10,000

1 7,0001 3,000

Concrete.._ ___________See footnotes at end of table.

1 2,000

Factories, bakeries, etc.—Con.Metal.. _________ _______ 5 $45,000

1 25,0001 8,0001 5,0001 4,0001 3,000

Garages, public______________ 6 13,100Frame. _ . . . . . . . . ____ 1 2,000Brick__________ _ ___ 3 8,100

1 4,1001 2,0001 2,000

Concrete__________ _____ 1 1,500Metal___________________ 1 1,500

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling1 _ ___ 1,038 177,025

Frame . . . ______ . ._ 505 67, 363Brick... ______________ .. 438 88,119Stone . . . . __________ . 1 200Stucco. . . _ _ ________ 5 1,062Brick and frame__________ 2 525Brick and stucco______ .. 3 652Concrete.. . ________ 13 6,233Metal________ ________ . 27 5,310Not reported_____________ 44 7, 561

Gasoline and service stations__ 19 82,500Brick_____ ______________ 5 33,800

1 14,0001 6,0001 5,000

4,80011 4,000

Stone................................. . 3 10, 2501 5,0001 4, 5001 750

Stucco..................... ............. 1 7,500

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 53: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 4 7

T a b l e A . — N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 9 3 9■—Continued

FLORIDA— Continued

JACKSONVILLE—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service, etc.— Continued

Concrete______________ . . 9 $29,4501 10,0001 4,8001 4,5001 2, 5001 2,2001 2,0001 1,5001 1,200

7501Metal__ _ __________ 1 1,500

Institutions: Concrete........... - 1 5,000Office buildings, including

banks: Concrete____________ 1 7,500Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Brick___ 1 40,361Public works and utilities_____ 12 386,830

Frame...............................- 1 3,100Brick___ _______________ 4 39,200

1 28,8001 4,8001 3,6001 2,000

Concrete. ______________ 2 71, 3601 51,3601 20,000

Metal___________________ 5 273,1701 93, 500

3 2 133, 0701 45, 5001 1,100

Schools: Brick.. __ ______ . . . 1 15,000Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1 _. . 95 39, 776

Frame._ _ . . . . . . . . . 45 10,960Brick____________________ 6 2, 705Concrete______ __________ 5 9, 350Metal___________________ 15 13,765Not reported________ 24 2,996

Stables and barns: Frame. . . 1 100Stores and other mercantile build­

ings— 40 219,750Frame___________________ 12 23,800

1 5,0001 5,0001 3,5001 2,0001 1,7001 1,5001 1,2501 1,2001 1,0001 6501 5001 500

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other, etc.—Con.Brick____________________ 8 $77,900

1 27,5001 18,0001 10,2001 10,0001 4,2001 4,0001 2,0001 2,000

Stone.................................... 2 9,8001 5,0001 4,800

Concrete........................... 7 23,7001 9,0001 7,5001 2,2001 2,0001 2,0001 5001 500

Metal................................ 8 22,3001 6,0001 5,0001 4,0001 3,5001 2,00Q1 8001 5001 500

Structural steel: Facing notreported___________ 1 32,000

Not reported__________ 2 30, 2501 29,6501 600

All other nonresidential struc­tures_____________ ____ 44 5,382

Fences *__________ _______ 39 2,162Frame___ __________ 11 720Metal________________ 13 707Not reported_________ 15 735

Retaining walls__ ________ 5 3, 220

Brick_______ _______ 2 220

1 2001 20

Concrete......... ........... . 3 3,000

1 1,8001 9001 300

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 54: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

48 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1 9 39

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified m aterials, 198 9— Continued

FLORIDA— Continued

MIAMI

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping residen­tial structures___________ 4 $103,000

Convents: Stucco___________ 1 18,000Hotels: Stucco. ...................... 2 84,000

1 55,0001 29,000

Servants’ quarters: Stucco_____ 1 1,000Total nonresidential structures. 827 1,925,011Amusement and recreation

places--------- ----------------------- 8 47,950Frame................................... 3 17,800

1 10,0001 4,8001 3,000

Stucco ................................. 2 17,0001 16,0001 1,000

Concrete............................. . 2 9,1501 8,2001 950

Not reported....... ................ 1 4,000Churches _ _______________ _ 9 107,414

Frame__________ ______ 2 5,1401 3,2401 1,900

Brick.................................... 1 40,000Stucco________________ 4 36, 674

1 20, 727 9,2001

1 4,1271 2,620

Frame and stucco .............. 1 3,000Concrete____ ____ 1 22,600

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: Stucco _ __________ 1 8,480

Garages, public: Stucco ............ 4 25,1501 11,9001 9,2501 2,0001 2,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Garages, private, when separate from dwelling i_____________ 243 $77, 582

Frame ____ _ _______ 92 22,010Stucco___ . . . ___ 147 54,648Not reported__________ 4 924

Gasoline and service stations:Stucco_____________________ 9 52, 505

1 14,0001 7,5001 7,5001 6,5001 5, 7901 4,0001 3,5001 3,000

7151Institutions: Stucco................... 3 30,500

1 15,0001 10,0001 5,500

Office buildings, including banks: Structural steel: Fac­ing not reported_______ ___

Public buildings—city, county, State and Federal: Rein­forced concrete: Cement fac­ing. ____ __________ _ _

1 325,000

*2 52,119Public works and utilities.. . . . 4 98,346

Frame ______ ______ 1 3,500Stucco . . . ____________ 1 29,000Metal. __ .............. . _ 1 5,000Not reported ................... 1 60,846

Schools: Stucco...................... 2 123,0001 67,0001 56,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 180 62, 621Frame________ __________ 96 29,117Brick_______ __________ 2 220Stucco . . . _______________ 49 27,242Frame and stucco.............. 2 850Concrete _. ______________ 2 1,090Metal_______ __________ 7 2,175Not reported_____________ 22 1,927

Stores and other mercantilebuildings__________ 115 849,384

Frame.................................. 6 6,0701 1,7201 1, 250

1,00011 9001 7001 500

Brick..................................... 1 23,000See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 55: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 49T a b l e A.— N u m ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified m aterials, 1989 '—Continued

F L O R ID A — C ontin ued

MI A MI—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvalution

Stores and other, etc.—Con. Stores and other, etc.—Con.Stucco— ______ ________ 104 $787,314 Stucco—Continued.

1 $2,7001 75,000 1 2,6001 65,000 1 2, 5001 45,000 1 2, 5001 45,000 1 2, 5001 36, 000 1 2, 2501 29,000 1 2, 0001 25, 000 1 2, 0001 23, 700 1 2, 0001 20, 000 1 2,0001 20,000 1 2, 0001 20,000 1 2,0001 16.200 1 2, 0001 16, 000 1 2,0001 15, 000 1 2, 0001 14,000 1 2, 0001 13, 500 1 1,8001 13, 250 1 1, 8001 13,000 1 1,8001 12, 000 1 1, 5601 11, 200 1 1, 5001 10,000 1 1,5001 10, 000 1 1, 4001 10, 000 1 1,3501 9,500 1 1,2001 9,000 1 1,2001 8,000 1 1,1801 6,500 1 1,1651 6,000 1 1,0001 6,000 1 1,0001 5,900 1 9681 5,600 1 9601 5, 500 1 8001 5, 500 1 8001 5, 000 1 8001 4, 600 1 7671 4,200 1 7501 4,000 1 6121 3, 900 1 5621 3, 500 1 5001 3, 5001 3, 500 Concrete_____ ___________ 1 4,0001 3,0001 3,000 Not reported..................... 3 29,0001 3,000 —1 3,000 1 22, 0001 3,000 1 4,0001 3, 000 1 3,0001 3,000 All other nonresidential struc­1 3,000 tures__________ ___________ 246 64,9601 3,0001 3,000 Fences 1 _ _ _____________ 170 21, 7121 3,0001 3, 000 Frame_______________ 18 1,1601 3,000 Stone... _________ 3 1651 3,000 Stucco_______________ 2 8851 3, 000 Metal____. . . ________ 131 16,8471 3, 000 Not reported.............. 16 2, 6551 3,0001 2, 940 Retaining walls 1_________ 76 43, 2481 2, 8001 2,800 Stone _____ . . . ____ 13 9,4681 2,800 Stucco ______ . . . . . . 40 17,4851 2, 700 Concrete___________ 20 16, 0451 2,700 Not reported______ 3 250

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 56: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

50 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1 9 39

T a b l e A.— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified m aterials, 1 939—Continued

F L O R ID A — Continued

ORLANDO

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

T otal nonresidential structures. 151 $203, 495 Sheds poultry houses,etc—Con.CnTifirftt.fi 2 $3,996

Amusement and recreationplaces_________________ . . . 3 10,613 1 3, 500

1 496Frame................................. . 2 6, 613 7 1,600

1 5,8631 750 1 700

1 300Brick........ ......... .................. 1 4,000 1 150

1 150Factories, bakeries, ice plants, 1 100

laundries, and other work­ 1 100shops: Concrete...................... 2 7,000 1 100

1 4,000 Stores and other mercantile1 3,000 buildings__________________ 26 119, 785

Garages, private, when separate Framp c/\nfrom dwelling i_____________ 100 31,151 Brick........ ........................ .11

ouu6,800

Frame..-....... ......................Stucco _ ______________

781

22, 586 300 Concrete............................... 23 111, 785

Concrete_________________ 14 6,280 1 34,000Metal___________________ 7 1,985 1 8,000

1 7,000Gasoline and service stations: 1 5,500

Concrete................................. 3 12,500 1 5,0001 5,000

1 6,500 1 5,0001 3,000 1 4,5001 3,000 1 3,800

1 3, 500Institutions: Concrete________ 1 6,000 1 3,000

1 3,000Office buildings, including 1 3,000

banks: Concrete — __________ 1 5, 700 1 3,0001 2,500

Sheds, poultry houses, etc_____ 15 10, 746 1 2, 5001 2,500

Frame................................... 6 5,150 1 2,5001 2,000

1 4,000 1 1,8001 400 1 1,7851 300 1 1,6001 225 1 1,3001 1251 100 Metal................................ . 1 700

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 57: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 51T a b l e A. — N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 98 9—Continued

F L O R ID A — Continued

PENSACOLA

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures.. 87 $100,296Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops_____ ______ . . . 4 30,000

Brick____ _ ______ ___ 1 5,000Metal___________________ 33 25,000

Garages, private, when sepa­rate from dwelling 1_________ 42 4,811

Frame___________________ 37 2, 256Brick____________________ 2 2, 500Metal___________________ 1 40Not reported_____________ 2 15

Gasoline and service stations:Brick___.. _______________ 4 21, 900

1 5, 8001 5, 6001 5, 5001 5,000

Office buildings, includingbanks: Frame._____________ 1 7,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1.. .. 25 $2, 735Frame________ ____ _ . 23 2,185B rick___________________ 2 550

Stores and other mercantilebuildings___________ _______ 11 33,850

Frame_______ ___________ 6 16, 05032 12, 400

1 1,9001 7501 5001 500

Brick____________________ 4 14, 8001 10, 0001 3,0001 1,0001 800

Metal____________________ 1 3,000

ST. PETERSBURG

Total nonhousekeeping residen­$178, 500tial structures.. . . . . -------- 35

Hotels: Stucco-------- -------------- 2 123,0001 68,0001 55,000

Lodging houses..... ..............- 3 22, 500Frame. . . . ___________ 1 9,500Stucco ----------- ---------- -- 1 5,000Concrete___________ _____ 1 8,000

Summer camps and cottages:Frame.. . . . ______ 3 30 33,000

Total nonresidential structures.. 592 503,690Amusement and recreation

places--- ------------------------ 5 22,300Frame_____ _________ 2 7,000

1 6,5001 500

Concrete________ ____ ___ 1 1, 500Structural steel: Facing not

reported_______________ 2 13,8001 13,0001 800

Churches___________________ 3 74,500Stucco.......—............... ........ 1 70,000Concrete________________ 2 4,500

1 2,5001 2,000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: Frame __________________ 1 $1,500

Garages, public______________ 3 16,200Concrete....................... .......... 2 15, 200

1 12,0001 3,200

Metal___________________ 1 1,000Garages, private, when separ­

ate from dwelling 1_________ 494 82, 795Frame____ . . __________ 469 73,480Brick . . . _____ . . . ______ 1 800Stucco_____ ___________ . 4 1,080Concrete_______________ . . . 17 7, 225Metal_____________________________ 3 210

Gasoline and service stations___ 4 15, 500Stucco___________________ 2 9, 500

1 6,0001 3,500

Concrete_____________ 2 6,0001 4,0001 2,000

Public works and utilties________ 4 11,500Frame......................................................... 3 5,000

1 2,5001 1, 5001 1, 0 0 0

Concrete.......................................1

6,500See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 58: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

52 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 193 9

T a b l e A.— N u m ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1939—Continued

F L O R ID A — C ontinued

ST. PETERSBURG—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Schools: Stucco________ _____ 1 $200,000 Stores and other, etc.—Con.Stucco-------------------------- 3 $19,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1___ 53 10,145 1 8,0001 7,000Frame________________ __ 34 6, 750 1 4, 000Stucco. _ _ _______ __ 1 400

Concrete __ 7 1,430 Concrete............................. 13 30, 750Metal.. _ _________ _ _ 11 1, 565 1 4, 800

Stables and barns: Concrete___ 1 600 11

4, 000 4, 00C

Stores and other mercantile 11

3, 500 2, 500buildings. __ ______ _ . 23 68, 650 1 2, 500

1 2, 500Frame________________ __ 3 3,900 1 2, 000

1 1,2001 2, 800 1 1,2001 600 1 1,1001 500 1 750

1 700Brick.................................... 2 10, 000 Metal................... ...... ......... 2 5, 000

1 7, 000 1 3, 0001 3, 000 1 2,000

TAMPA

Total nonresidential structures.. 235 $249, 267Amusement and recreation

places5. _______ __________ 1 500Churches. _ _ __ ___________ 2 14,000

Brick and stone _ ___ 1 2, 000Concrete. _ _ __ _ __ 1 12, 000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops___ _ __ _________ 2 14,000

Frame ____ ___ _____ 1 10, 000Metal _ _____________ _ 1 4, 000

Garages, public. ____________ 4 14, 500Frame. _ _ ___ _______ _ 1 2, 500Concrete____ ___________ 3 12, 000

32 9,0001 3,000

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling1___ ______ 98 $14, 662

Frame. ____________ _ 78 10,815Brick____ __________ ___ 1 300Frame and stucco_______ 1 900Concrete . . _ ___ 5 1,120Metal. ___ _ . . ___ 13 1, 527

Gasoline and service stations__ 12 28, 350

Concrete_________ 11 23, 3501 4, 3001 4, 3001 4, 3001 3, 0001 2, 6001 1, 5001 9501 7001 7001 5001 500

Metal___________ ___ 1 5, 000See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 59: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 53T a b l e A.— N um ber and perm it valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 939—Continued

F L O R ID A — C ontinuedTAMPA—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public works and utilities:Frame _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ 1 $1,300

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 79 13, 270Frame _ ____________ ___ 51 7,915Concrete_______ _______ 4 970Metal _ ___ ____ 23 4, 260Not reported.._ _ _____... 1 125

Stores and other mercantilebuildings- ___________ ____ 26 147, 935

Frame........................... ...... 6 5,6351 1, 5001 1,0001 1,0001 7501 7351 650

Brick-................................... 2 7, 5001 4, 0001 3,500

Brick and frame.— _ __ _ _ 1 2, 500Concrete. __ ___________ 9 64,600

1 25, 0001 15,0001 14, 8001 6,2001 9001 8001 7001 7001 500

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other, etc.—Con.M etal... _______________ 8 $67, 700

1 20, 0003 5 45, 000

1 2,0001 700

All other nonresidential struc­tures- ________ ____ 10 750

Fences __ ___ _______ _ - 7 550Frame_______________ 2 300

1 2501 50

Metal________________ 1 25Not reported_________ 4 225

1 1501 251 251 25

Retaining walls: Concrete.. 3 2001 1001 751 25

WEST PALM BEACH

Total nonhousekeeping resi­dential structures, _ __ ______ 3 $35, 000

Orphanages: Concrete.- __ _ _ 3 3 35, 000Total nonresidential struc­

tures. _ _. _ _ __ ___ 122 400, 441Amusement and recreation

places: Frame- _ __ _____ 1 1, 000Churches: Brick ____ . . . __ 3 17, 200

1 10, 0001 5,0001 2,200

Garages, private, when sep­arate from dwelling 1 ______ 71 17, 391

Frame _____ ________ 60 11, 781Brick___ _ __ . __ _. 7 3, 820Stucco __. ._ ___ _ _ ___ 2 290Concrete.__ __ ______ _ 2 1,500

Gasoline and service stations__ 5 18,800Brick...__________ _______ 4 16, 800

1 10, 0001 3, 6001 2,0001 1,200

Frame and stucco________ 1 2,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Brick___ 1 55, 378

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1. . . _ 22 $9, 719Frame _ _ __ _______ 16 5, 629Brick. __ ______ ___ 3 580Concrete __ _ ________ 2 450Not reported.. _ _ . 1 3,110

Stores and other mercantilebuildings- ___ __ __ _ 17 279, 603

Frame________________ _ 4 14, 3401 10, 5001 1, 4401 1, 2001 1, 200

Brick.................................... 12 264, 4381 193,1901 29, 0001 10, 0001 8, 5001 8, 4001 4,0001 3,9081 2, 3401 1,8001 1, 3001 1, 0001 1, 000

Concrete___________ _____ 1 825All other nonresidential struc­

tures: Retaining walls_____ 2 1,350Brick____ _______ -_- 1 1,200Concrete______ _ __ 1 150

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 60: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

54 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— 'N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified m aterials, 193 9— Continued

GEORGIA

ATLANTA

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping resi-dential structures____ _______ 4 $201,070

Association buildings: Brickveneer. ____________ ___ 1 17,000

Dormitories: Brick....... ............. 2 182,5701 91, 2851 91,285

Servants' quarters: Concrete.. . 1 1, 500Total nonresidential structures.. 427 3,679, 754Amusement and recreation

places _____ _________ _ _. 6 201, 708Frame.._____ _____ _______ 1 500Brick.. _________________ 4 166, 208

1 100, 0001 38, 5291 20,0001 7, 679

Concrete........................... 1 35,000Churches _______________ __ 12 219,147

Frame_________________ _ 5 8, 2501 2, 0001 2,0001 2,0001 1, 2501 1,000

Brick________ _________ 3 30, 2501 25, 0001 4, 2501 1,000

Brick veneer_____________ 3 31, 2001 20,0001 8, 0001 3, 200

Structural steel: Brick fac­ing— 1 149,447

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops____________ ____ 18 1,873, 585

Frame._____________ 1 1,500Brick____________________ 5 347, 625

L 250, 0001 33,0001 30,0001 30,0001 4,625

Concrete_______ _________ 1 5,000See footnotes at end of table.

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Factories, bakeries, etc.—Con.Metal__________ _____ _ 8 $34,460

1 6,96033 20,000

1 3,0001 2, 5001 1,0001 1,000

Structural steel: Brick fac­ing____________________ 2 1,460, 000

1 1,400,0001 60, 000

Structural steel: Facing notreported. _____________ 1 25,000

Garages, public________ ______ 7 109,950Brick_______ ____ _______ 5 104,350

1 75,0001 15,8501 5, 5001 5, 0001 3,000

Concrete________ ______ 1 4,000Metal. _____ ________ 1 1,600Garages, private, when separate

from dwelling i_____________ 150 16, 954Frame_________________ _ 141 14,089Brick___ _ __________ 2 725Brick and frame________ _ 1 200Stone and frame__________ 1 125Metal___________________ 5 1,815

Gasoline and service stations___ 41 144, 775Frame___________________ 3 2,800

1 1, 8001 5001 500

Brick_________ 17 68, 5251 12,7001 7, 2001 7,0001 6,2251 5, 0001 4,8001 4, 7501 4,0001 4,0001 3,0001 2,6001 2,0001 1,8001 1,1501 1, 0001 8001 500

Brick veneer...................... 1 500

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 61: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 55T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

GEORGIA— Continued

ATLANTA—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline, etc.—Continued.Brick and stucco_________, 4 $8, 250

1 3,0001 2, 5001 1, 5501 1,200

Concrete__________ ______ 11 34,7501 6, 0001 5,1001 4, 7501 4,7001 3,2001 3,0001 3,0001 2,0001 1,2001 1,0001 800

Metal___________________ 2 6,8001 5,0001 1,800

Structural steel: Brick fac­ing____________________ 1 16, 500

Tile_____________________ 2 6,6501 6,0001 650

Institutions _____________ _ 3 131, 718Brick.. . . . __________ _ 21 121, 918Brick veneer _________ . 2 9, 800

1 7,8001 2,000

Office buildings, includingbanks: Brick veneer__ _ __ _ 1 11, 750

Public works and utilities_____ 3 52, 000Frame___________________ 1 2,000Brick__ . . . _____ _ . _ _ 1 25,000Structural steel: Brick fac­

ing— 1 25,000Schools: Brick_______________ 2 78, 345

1 70, 3501 7, 995

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 116 24, 377Frame________________ _ 74 12, 575Brick____________________ 9 2, 945Stucco_________ ________ 1 400Concrete_____ _ 2 1, 750Metal____________________ 28 5, 707Glass. _______ ___ _____ 1 300Tile_____________________ 1 700

Stables and barns: Frame _ . . . 2 1251 1001 25

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other mercantile buildings. ______ . ______ 65 $814,920

Frame___________________ 13 58, 6501 16, 0001 15, 0001 6,4001 5, 2001 4,2001 3,0001 2, 5001 1,7001 1,4001 1,0001 1, 0001 7501 500

Brick___________ _______ 32 308, 7701 72, 0001 29, 0001 27, 0001 20,0001 16, 5001 12, 5001 12, 0001 12, 0001 11,0001 8,0001 8, 000

8, 00011 8, 0001 5, 9001 5, 0001 5, 0001 5, 0001 5, 0001 4, 7201 4, 5001 4, 3001 4, 0001 4, 0001 2,8001 2, 8001 2, 8001 2, 7501 2, 0001 1,8001 1,0001 8001 600

Brick veneer .................... 2 4, 3501 2,2501 2,100

Frame and stucco_________ 2 2,1001 1,2001 900

Brick and frame_________ 1 21,000

Concrete_________________ 3 16, 6001 14, 0001 1,600

I 1 1,000See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 62: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

56 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 193 9—Continued

GEORGIA— Continued

ATLANTA—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores andbther, etc.—Con. Stores and other, etc.—Con.Metal__ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 $47,150 Glass _ _ _ 1 $1, 200

1 41,750 Tile_________ _____ ______ 3 3,9501 2,9001 1,500 1 1,5001 1,000 1 1,250

1 1,200Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing _ ___ 2 320,400 Not reported 1 750All other nonresidential struc­

1 300,000 tures: Retaining walls, stone. 1 4001 20,400

Structural steel: Brick fac­ing-------------------------- __ 1 30,000

AUGUSTA

Total nonresidential struc­tures______ _._ ______ _ 84 $464,974

Amusement and recreationplaces._ ____„__________ _ 2 157,200

Brick_______ _______ 1 149,800Not reported___________ _ 1 7,400

Churches: Brick ______ 1 46,000Garages, private, when separate

from dwelling i ___ _____ 31 5,693Frame. _____________ _ 18 1,888Brick___ _ __ _______ __ 3 1,800Stucco. __ . ________ 1 100Not reported _ _ _ 9 1, 905

Gasoline and service stations__ 2 2, 850Brick______________ ___ __ 1 2,200Not reported____ _____ 1 650

Public works and utilities. _ __ 2 229,825Brick___________________ 1 181,825Not reported. _ _______ _ 1 48,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 29 4,391Frame. _ _____________ 14 1,661Brick____ ______________ 6 2,145Metal.. _. ______ ___ 3 215Not reported_________ ___ 6 370

Stables and barns: Frame. . .. 1 $1,980Stores and other mercantile

buildings_________________ 9 16, 200Frame____ ____________ 1 1, 500Brick............................ ...... 8 14, 700

1 7,0001 1,8001 1,5001 1,4001 1,0001 8001 7001 500

All other nonresidential struc­tures . . . ___ . . .. 7 835

Fences _________________ 6 635Frame.......................... 2 440

1 4001 40

Not reported......... ........ 4 1951 851 751 251 10

Retaining walls: Brick........ 1 200

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 63: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 57T a b l e A ,— Number and 'permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

GEORGIA— Continued

COLUM BUS

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping resi-dential structures__________ 2 $66, 380

Nurses’ homes: Brick_____ ___ 1 66,230Summer camps and cottages:

Frame________ _____ ______ 1 150Total nonresidential struc-

tures____ _ _ __________ 105 602,805Amusement and recreation

places: Brick___ __ ___ _ 1 118,251Churches_________ ______ _ 4 16,100

Frame__________________ 1 1,000Brick___ ______ __________ 2 12, 500

1 7, 5001 5,000

Brick veneer _________ 1 2,600Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops: B rick____________ _• 3 245, 000

1 145, 0001 60, 0001 40, 000

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling L ____________ 39 2,918

Frame_________ _____ ____ 32 2,188Brick______ ___________ 1 150Metal_________ __________ 6 580

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service stations:Brick______ ______________ 3 $20, 800

1 8, 3001 7,5001 5, 000

Institutions: Brick__________Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Structural

1 30,000

steel, brick fa cine_____ 1 86,885Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1__ 42 7, 051

Frame ___ 31 4, 991B rick ,.._______ . . . ____ 2 415MetaL _ _______ 8 1. 610Tile_ ___________________ 1 35

Stores and other mercantilebuildings,_______ ________ 10 75,750

Frame.......... ........................ 2 1,5001 1,0001 500

Brick..... ..................... ...... ... 8 74, 2501 35, 0001 25, 4001 4,0001 3, 4501 2,0001 2,0001 1,500

All other nonresidential struc­1 900

tures: Fences, frame________ 1 50

MACON

Total nonhousekeeping resi­ Garages, private, etc.—Con.dential structures___ _____ 1 $35,000 Brick_________________ __ 4 $2,285

Dormitories: Brick ___________ 1 35,000 1 1,1001 1,000

Total nonresidential struc­ 1 110tures. _ __ ___ _______ 41 91,559 1 75

Churches: Frame____________ 2 4,000 Metal 5 1, 3001 2,000 1 5001 2,000 1 500

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, 1 150laundries, and other work­ 1 100shops: Brick ___________ 3 28,500 ’ 1 50

1 20,000 Gasoline and service stations:1 5,000 Brick______________________ 4 12, 6001 3,500

1 7, 300Garages, private, when separate 1 3, 500

from dwelling ____ _ 11 3, 735 1 1,0001 800

Frame _ . ___ ________ 2 1501 1001 50

See footn otes at end o f table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 64: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

58 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

GEOR GIA— Continued.

M A C O N— C ontinued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public works and utilities: Metal_____________________ 1 $21,374

Sheds, poultry houses, etc______ 15 4,850Frame__________________ 8 1,600

1 5001 3001 2751 2001 1251 1001 501 50

Brick------------------------------ 3 2,5501 1,5001 8001 250

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.—Con.Metal________ _________ 4 $700

1 2501 2001 2001 50

Stores and other mercantilebuildings_________________ 5 16,500

Frame ________________ 1 5,000Brick____________________ 4 11,500

1111

7,8001,5001,2001,000

SAVANNAH

Total nonhousekeeping residen­tial structures______________

Servants’ quarters: Brickveneer_____________________

Summer camps and cottages: Frame____________________

Total nonresidential structures.Amusement and recreation

places______________________Frame________ ____ ______

Brick...Churches______

Frame_____Brick______Brick veneer

22 $12,270

1 5,200

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops____________1_________ 3 $16,200

Frame. 2 6,200

211111111111

* 2111111111

7,0701,200

9755005004504504004003503005002001501501501001001005045

Brick veneer..........Garages, public: Brick.

1 5,0001 1,2001 10,0001 15,000

Garages, private, when separate from dwelling 1_____________

Frame___________________Brick____________________Stucco___________________Concrete_________________Metal__________________Tile_____________________

187 28,070130 15,20045 11,2252 2505 8503 2952 250

Gasoline and service stations__Frame___________________Brick___________________

6 9,7001 1.5001 2,000

270 372,586Concrete. 4 6,200

4 18.1003 7,3001 3, 5001 3,0001 8001 10,8003 20,4651 1,5001 3,9651 15,000

1 2,5001 2,2001 1,0001 500

Institutions: Concrete. 1 90,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Brick___

Public works and utilities: Metal_____________________

3 47,5891 19,000

31 16, 5891 12,0001 1,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 65: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 59T a b l A .— Number and 'permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1989— Continued

GEORGIA—-Continued

S A V ANN AH—Continued

Num-Type of structure and material ber of

struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1. 43 $6,815 Stores and other, etc—Con. Brick__________________ 6 $46,547

Frame— _____________ 40 6,425Concrete.-- __ ________ 1 150Metal___________________ 2 240

Stables and barns: Frame_____ 1 100Stores and other mercantile

buildings - _____________ _ 15 118, 647Frame_____________ _____ 6 56,700

Brick and stucco.Concrete_______Metal_________

1 30,0001 5,0001 4,9471 3,0001 2,4001 1,2001 4,5001 10,0001 900

111111

50,0001,8001.5001.5001,000

900

All other nonresidential struc­tures: Fences______________

Frame___________________Brick____________________

2 9001 4001 500

M A R Y L A N D

BALTIMORE

Total nonresidential structures. 2,187 $3,583,742Amusement and recreation

places. _ _ ______ __ ___ 8 117,000Frame___ __________ _ 1 700Brick________________ ___ 5 46,300

1 20,0001 9,0001 8,5001 6,0001 2,800

Brick and stone- _______ 1 20,000Structural steel: Brick facing 1 50,000

Churches: Brick _ _ _ ______ 1 7,000Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops___ . ______ ____ _ 29 617,853

Frame__ __ ___________ 1 52,450Brick— _________ ______ 14 132, 350

1 25,0001 20,0001 17, 2001 15,0001 10,0001 9,0001 7,0001 6,0001 5,0001 5,0001 4, 5001 3, 650

3 2 5,000

Factories, bakeries, etc.—Con.Concrete- ______________ 1 $2,000Metal___________ ______ 7 30,928

1 10,0001 5,0001 4,8001 4,0001 3, 3281 2,0001 1,800

Reinforced concrete: Brickfacing. _ __ __________ 4 210,125

32 109,12532 101,000

Structural steel: Facing notreported - _ __ ___ _ 1 175,000

Tile_____________________ 1 15,000Garages, public_______________ 9 55, 910

Brick__________________ 7 41,9001 15,0001 12,0001 5,0001 4,0001 3,0001 1,5001 1,400

Concrete. _______________ 1 7,500Metal______________ _____ 1 6,510

See footnotes at end of table.

2 7 1 7 1 1 °— 42— 5

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 66: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

60 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 193 9

T a b l e A .-— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

M A R Y L A N D — Continued

BALTIMORE—Continued

Num-Type of structure and material

Garages, private, when separate from dwelling 1_____________

Frame___________________Brick____________________Stone____________________Brick and frame__________Brick and stone__________Stone and frame__________Concrete________________Metal___________________

ber of Permit struc- valuation tures

1, 960 $427, 06687 21, 820

1,293 282, 77522 6, 4503 1,0008 1,8001 200

490 102, 50956 10, 512

Gasoline and service stations___Brick____________________

26 116, 50014 67, 0001 8,0001 6, 5001 6,0001 6,0001 5, 5001 5,0001 4, 5001 4,0001 4,0001 4,0001 4,0001 3, 5001 3,0001 3,000

Brick and stucco. 3 11,5001 6,0001 3,0001 2,500

Stucco.. _ Concrete.

Institutions: Brick.

1! 8

2,000 36,000

i 1 6, 000! 1 5, 000| 1 5, 0001 1 5, 000s 1 4, 500

1 4, 0001 3, 5001 3,000

3 3 250,000Office buildings,

banks_________including

6 77,5001 6,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Office buildings, etc.—Con.Brick____________________ 4 $53, 500

1 35,0001 8,0001 5, 5001 5,000

Brick and stone. __ _ ___ 1 18, 000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Brick.. __ 2 404, 80021 399, 800

1 5,000Public works and utilities__ 12 367, 700

Frame.. _ ____ 1 6,000

Brick____________________ 3 20, 2001 15,0001 2,7001 2, 500

Stone... _______________ 1 17,000Concrete . _______ ____ 3 2 2.500Metal.. . _____________ 2 26, 000

1 23, 0001 3, 000

Structural steel: Facing notreported _ _ _ ___ _ _ 3 296, 000

3 2 275, 0001 21, 000

Schools: Brick. ________ __ 2 409, 9001 402, 9001 7, 000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1. 42 12, 226Frame _. . . 16 3, 345Brick________________ ___ 10 3, 700Concrete____________ ____ 9 3, 016Metal___________________ 7 2,165

Stables and barns: Brick____ 2 1,5751 1, 3001 275Frame___________________

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 67: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 61

T a ble A .-— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 198 9— Continued

M A R Y L A N D —Continued

BALTIMORE—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other mercantile Stores and others, etc.—Con.buildings________ __________ 85 $718,712 Brick—Continued.

1 $1,000Frame _________ ______ 1 1,000 1 1,000

1 900B rick ...___________ ____ 51 387, 212 1 850

1 6001 60, 000 1 5101 30,000 1 5021 30,000 1 5001 25,0001 25,000 Stucco___________________ 1 5001 20,0001 15, 000 Concrete_______________ _ 2 4, 7001 13,0001 10, 000 1 3,4001 10, 000 1 1, 3001 9,5001 9,000 Metal___________________ 25 102,3001 9,0001 8,000 1 25, 0001 8,000 1 14, 0001 8,000 1 10, 0001 7, 500 1 10, 0001 7, 000 1 9,0001 6,000 1 5,0001 6,000 1 3, 0001 4, 250 1 2,5001 4,200 3 3 7, 0001 4,000 33 6, 0001 4,000 1 1,5001 3, 500 3 5 6, 0001 3,500 3 2 1, 4001 3, 500 1 7001 3,200 3 2 1,2001 3,200

35 15,000 Reinforced concrete: Brick1 3, 000 facing ____________ _ .. 3 125, 0001 2,5001 2,000 1 50,0001 2,000 1 45. 0001 2,000 1 30, 0001 1, 5001 1, 500 Structural steel:1 1,300 Brick facing.. . . . ____ 1 40,0001 1,200 Facing not reported___ 1 58,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 68: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

62 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1 9 3 9

T a b l A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— C o n tin u e d

M A R Y L A N D — Continued

CUMBERLAND

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures. _ 70 $474,015 Sheds, poultry houses, etc.. ._ 10 $3,890Factories, bakeries, ice plants, Frame.. _ . . . _________ 1 100

laundries, and other work- Brick______________ _____ 1 1,500shops: Concrete... . . _. . 1 1,000

Concrete___________ ____ 5 1,590Garages, public: Concrete_____ 1 2,400

1 490Garages, private, when separate 1 400

from dwelling i_. . . _ _. . . . 47 9,100 1 3501 300

Frame___ _____________ 12 1,890 1 50Brick____________________ 6 985 *Stone _ ________ 1 370 Metal____________________ 3 700nnriprfitft 14 3,935Metal. ._ . . . _______ 13 1,845 1 400Tile______ ___________ . 1 75 1 200

1 100Gasoline and service stations__ 3 9,500

Stores and other mercantileConcrete 2 3, 500 buildings_______ . . . 6 149, 500

1 3,000 Brick____________________ 2 140,0001 500

1 1 0 0 , 0 0 0

Metal............ ....................... 1 6 , 0 0 01 40,000

Concrete_________________ 2 7,000Pehnr»l«!• Prick 3 298,625

1 5,0001 158, 395 1 2 , 0 0 01 102, 2501 37, 980 Metal................................... 1 2,500

HAGERSTOWN

Total nonresidential structures.Garages, private, when separ­

ate from dwelling 1__________Frame___________________Brick____________________Concrete_________________

Gasoline and service stations. _.Stucco___________________Brick and stucco_________Concrete_________________

Public buildings—city, county, State, and Federal: Brick and stone______________________

Public works and utilities: Stone______________________

90 $428,034 Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1 ___ 17 $3, 670Frame.. _______ . . . . . . 13 1,845

61 13, 525 Brick_______________ ____ 2 1,700C!nn crctc. 2 12531 4, 4604 1,200 Stores and other mercantile

26 7, 865 buildings_________ _. _ . 6 67, 3003 11,800 Frame___ __ _________ . 1 5001 4,800 Concrete____ _____ _______ 4 6,8001 3,0001 4,000 1 3,200

1 2,0001 1,0001 600

1 318, 739Reinforced concrete: Fac­

3 2 13,000 ing not reported. ____ 1 60,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 69: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 63T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

N O R T H C A R O L IN A

ASHEVILLE

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures. 55 $504, 799Amusements and recreation

places: Brick___________ _ . 1 240,000

Churches: Frame ________ _ 1 6,500

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries and other work­shops: Brick 1 100,000

Garages, public: Brick......... . _ 2 5,0001 3,5001 1,500

Garages, private when sepa­rate from dwelling1 . ___ 33 3, 374

Frame___ _________ ____ 29 3, 039Concrete____________ _ _ 4 335

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc____ 10 $1, 025Frame_______________ __ 1 300

1 1501 1501 1001 1001 751 501 501 25

Stores and other mercantile1 25

buildings___________ __ _ 7 148, 900Frame__________ _____ 1 700Brick............. ................ ...... 3 132, 900

1 125,0001 4,9001 3, 000

Brick veneer__ __________ 1 5,000Concrete. _ __________ 1 4,800Metal___________________ 1 5,500

CHARLOTTE

Total nonhousekeeping resi­dential structures.. . . . . . . 2 $90,100

Dormitories: Stone.. _ _ _____ 1 90,000Summer camps and cottages:

Frame. _____ . . . _ . . . 1 100Total nonresidential structures. 92 1, 612, 757Amusement and recreation

places: Brick _ ___________ 1 22, 000Churches___. . . _____ ________ 3 71,500

Frame... _ ______________ 1 1,000Brick... __________ ___ 1 28, 500Structural steel: Brick fac­

ing— 1 42,000Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops _______________ .. . 10 130, 500

Frame . . . _______ _ . . . 1 1,200Brick____________________ 5 81, 500

1 40,0001 18,0001 10,0001 7,5001 6,000

Metal____ _____________ 1 2,000Structural steel: Brick fac­

ing— 2 42,3001 23,8001 18,500

Not reported_____________ 1 3,500See footnotes at end of table.

Garages, public: Brick________ 2 $4,0001 2, 0001 2,000

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling i _ ___________ 13 1,390

Frame___________________ 11 805Brick___________ _______ 1 185Metal.. . _ _______ 1 400

Gasoline and service stations___ 14 49, 900Frame___ ______________ 1 3,000Brick____________________ 12 42,400

1 6,0001 6, 0001 5,0001 5, 0001 3,5001 3, 0001 3,0001 3,0001 2, 8001 2, 5001 1, 6001 1,000

Brick and stucco_________ 1 4,500

Institutions: Brick______ ____ 3 1,116, 6423 2 747,039

1 369, 603Office buildings, including

banks: Brick_______________ 1 5,245Public works and utilities:

Brick_______________ ____ 1 4,800

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 70: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

64 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

N O R T H C A R O L IN A — Continued

CHARLOTTE—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1 _. 30 $8, 380Frame__ _________ ____ 22 5, 970Brick____________________ 4 1, 700Stone____ .. . . . ______ 1 60Metal___________________ 1 75Tile_____________________ 1 325Not reported____________ 1 250

Stores and other mercantilebuildings___ ____ ___ ___ 14 198,400

Frame__________ ______ 3 13,0001 6,0001 4,0001 3,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other, etc.—Con. Brick............. ..................... . 5 $131,700

1 108,0001 9.000

7.00011 4,5001 3,200

Metal................................... 2 3, 7001 3,000

700Structural steel: 1Brick facing__________ 1 9,500Facing not reported___ 3 40, 500

1 28,0001 9,0001 3, 500

DURHAM

Total nonresidential structures. 49 $1,468,937Amusement and recreation

places.._ _________ _____ 3 434, 500Frame____ ____________Stone_________ _____ .Concrete------ -------------------

Churches_____ ____________

1114

2, 500 375, 000 57,00059,160

Frame______________ . . . 2 3,160

Brick---------- ----------------Brick veneer_____ _ _ _ _

actories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops ___ . . . . . . . . . . . .

1111

3

1,6601,500

36.00020.000

51,454Brick____________________ 2 14,345

1 9,3951 4, 950

Brick veneer_____________ 1 37,109Garages, public---------------------- 3 25, 700

Brick______________ ____ _ 2 24,3001 20,0001 4,300

Stone. . . . . . . . . 1 1,400Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling: Frame___ 5 9251 2501 2001 175

32 300Gasoline and service stations. _. 5 15,450

Frame____________ ._ __ _ 2 4, 8501 3,9001 950

Gasoline, etc.—Continued.Stone 1 $1,500Frame and stucco. _ _ 1 4,300Metal___________________ 1 4, 800

Institutions: Stone. _ . . . 1 400,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Stone___ * 1 56,000Schools: Brick ______ . . 6 349, 878

1 107,6533 2 176,949

1 30,4941 19,1821 15, 600

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.:Frame . . . . . . . 8 3,370

1 7501 6001 4951 4751 3501 3001 2001 200

Stores and other mercantilebuildings. . . . . . . _ _ 10 72, 500

Frame____ _________ . . . 2 1,6001 1,0001 600

Brick____________________ 6 59, 0001 22, 0001 10,000

3 2 18,0001 4, 5001 4, 500

Not reported.. 2 11, 9001 9, 5001 2,400

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 71: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 65T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

N O R T H C A R O L IN A — Continued

GREENSBORO

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping residen-tial structures. . . . 2 $304, 637

Dormitories 6__ . . . 2 304, 637Total nonresidential structures. 67 338, 405Amusement and recreation

places: Concrete__ _ 1 5, 700Churches: Brick _ __ __ 1 32,000Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops: Brick ________ __ 3 9, 500

1 5,0001 2, 5001 2,000

Garages, private, when sep­arate from dwelling 1___ . . . 19 1,965

Frame. _ _ _ _ _______ 16 1, 515Brick... ______ _ . . . 1 200Stone. _ 1 200Tile_____________________ 1 50

Gasoline and service stations.._ 6 17,000Frame___________________ 1 1,000Brick ............... .................. 4 14,000

1 6, 0001 3,0001 3,0001 2,000

Concrete _ _________ __ 1 2,000Office buildings, including

banks: Brick. . . . _ _ 1 18,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal5. _ __ . _ 1 38,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public works and utilities:Brick______________________ 1 $5,000

Schools _. . . . . . . ______ 2 156,627Brick____________________ 1 60,000Not reported___________ 1 96, 627

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1___ 15 3,113Frame... . . . . 10 1,838Brick____________________ 3 825Concrete___ 2 450

Stables and barns: Frame____ 1 100Stores and other mercantile

buildings. .. . . . . . . _. 15 51,200Frame......................... ........ 5 12, 500

1 4,0001 3,0001 2,5001 2, 0001 1,000

Brick___ _______ _________ 2 20,1001 15, 5001 4, 600

Brick veneer_____ _____ 2 10, 0001 6,0001 4,000

Concrete__________ _ _ 1 900Metal_____________ _ _ 5 7.700

1 2,0001 1,8001 1,8001 1, 500

All other nonresidential struc­1 600

tures: Fences: Brick________ 1 200

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 72: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

66 BUILDING PERMIT SURVET, 1939

T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- mesidential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— Continued

N O R T H C A R O L IN A — Continued

HIGH POINT

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures 127 $122,641 Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1______ 19 $1,483Am usem ent and recreation Frame — ___________ 14 1,038

places: B rick__________ 1 12,750 Metal__________ _____ __13

15390

Churches--. __ ------------ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 46,370 Not reported_________ __ 1 40

Frame ______________ - 3 7,000 Stables and barns: Frame___- 2 351 25

1 2,500 1 1011 2, 500 o nnn Stores and other mercantile1 A, UUU buildings _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 11 42,300

Brick _ ________________ 1 15, 500 Frame__________ _ ______ 5 33,100Brick veneer _ ------------------------ 1 11,870 1 K AAAStucco___ - - - - - - - - - _ 1 12,000 1

110, UUU15,000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, 11 2,000600laundries, and other work­ 1

shops: Metal __ _ - ___ 1 1,200 1 500

Garages, private, when separate Concrete........................... .......... 1 1,200from dwelling 1_____ ______ 84 12,303 Metal....... ........................... 5 8,000

Frame _ __________ --- 74 8,373 1 2,000Brick----- ----------- ----------- 7 3, 050 1 2,000Metal_________ _____ _ - 3 880 1 1, 500

1 1,300Gasoline and service stations__ 2 5,500 1 1,200

All other nonresidential struc­Brick____________________ 1 1,500 tures: Retaining walls: Con­Brick and stucco ____ 1 4,000 crete___ - ___ ____ . 1 700

RALEIGH

Total nonhousekeeping residen­tial structures, ___________ 4 $221, 522

Dormitories: Brick- - ______ 1 73,001Hotels: Brick _____________ 1 17,500Nurses’ homes: Brick. _____ 2 131,021

1 97,0001 34,021

Total nonresidential structures _ 73 1,927, 208Amusement and recreation

places: Brick. _ __ ______ 1 40,000Churches_________ ________ 4 93,600

Frame___________________ 2 17,4001 16,0001 1,400

Brick________ ___________ 2 76,2001 75,0001 1,200

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: Brick _ _ . 1 $1,000

Garages, public: Frame______ 1 1,000Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling 1____ _ __ 16 2,715Frame________________ . 11 1, 990Brick________________ __ 3 500Concrete________________ 1 40Metal________________ 1 185

Gasoline and service stations:Brick______________________ 2 4,000

1 3, 5001 500

Institutions__________________ 6 418,916Brick____________________ 5 278, 916

1 112, 8891 56,1651 51, 7901 36, 5011 21, 571

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 73: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 67T a b l e A .'— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1989— C on tinu e d

N O R T H C A R O L IN A — Continued

RALEIGH—C ontinued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Institutions—ContinuedReinforced concrete: Brick

facing ------------------------ 1 $140,000Office buildings, including

banks: Brick and stone. . 1 205,000Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal5__ 1 202,048Public works and utilities_____ 4 295, 591

Brick__ _________________ 2 272, 2911 259,4361 12, 855

Concrete_________________ 1 1,300Metal___________________ 1 22,000

Schools: Brick____ _ 1 325,000Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1. 14 7, 250

Frame__________ ______ _ 11 6, 750Concrete___ - ____ _ 1 200Metal__________________ 2 300

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and other mercantile buildings.. . . . . _____ 21 $331,088

Frame______ ____ ____ . . . 9 12,1001 2, 5001 2,4001 2, 0001 1,5001 1,1001 8001 8001 5001 500

Brick___ ____ ___________ 8 296, 0001 250,0001 15,0001 9,0001 8,0001 7,0001 3,0001 2, 5001 1,500

Concrete_____________ . . . 1 5, 500Metal___________________ 3 17,488

1 12,4001 2, 5881 2, 500

WILMINGTON

Total nonresidential structures.. Churches: Frame____________

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: Brick_______________

Garages, public: Structural steel: Brick facing__________

Garages, private, when separate from dwelling: Metal_______

42 $379,343 Gasoline and service stations.__ 6 $20, 5002 9,000 Brick . . . ___ 4 16, 5001 7,0001 2,000 1 6, 000

1 5, 0001 3,000

2 25,000 1 2, 5001 15,000 Brick veneer . . ______ _ 1 2,5001 10, 000 Stucco. . . . . 1 1, 500

Public buildings—city, county,1 56,000 State, and Federal: Brick___ 1 4,500Q Public works and utilities:O 54U Structural steel, brick facing... 2 143,0001 1351 100 1 118,0001 75 1 25,0001 751 50 Schools: Brick_______________ 2 68, 0001 501 30 1 35,0001 25 1 33, 000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 74: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

68 B U IL D IN G P E R M IT S U R V E Y , 1 9 3 9

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified materials, 1939— C o n tin u ed

N O R T H C AR O LIN A— Continued W I L M I N G T O N — C o n t in u e d

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Sheds, poultry houses, etc_____ 10 $1,603 Stores and other mercantilebuildings _ _ _____ - 8 $51, 200

Frame-- ____- _ 4 128Pram a 1 1 200

11

6025 Brick----------- -------------- 2 19, 500

1 25 1 15, 0001 18 1 4, 500

Metal ____ 6 1,475 Metal___________________ 3 12,0001 6,000

1 400 1 5,0001 400 1 1,00011

300175 Structural steel: Brick facing - - _ 2 18, 500

1 150 1 12, 0001 50 1 6, 500

WINSTON-SALEM

Total nonresidential structures. 211 $1,017,604Amusement and recreation

places. _ _____________ 11 75,000Frame______ ______ ______ 9 25,056

1 8,4081 6,0001 5,000

36 5,648Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing ____________ _ 2 49,9441 28,8361 21,108

Churches: Brick.. ___________ 2 19.8001 15,0001 4,800

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: Brick _ _______ 2 490,000

1 300,0001 190,000

Garages, public: Concrete. _ _ 1 3,500Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling i_ ______ 139 17,699Frame__________ _______ 102 11,066Brick___ _ ______. . . _ 26 4,678Brick and frame_________ 2 300Concrete __ ______ _____ 2 240Metal___________ ______ 7 1,415

Gasoline and service stations... 10 19, 550Frame_____ ____ _______ 1 2,000Brick... ._ _____ _________ 7 14,550

1 3,4001 3,0001 2,4001 2,0001 1,7501 1,0001 1,000

Gasoline and service, etc.—Con.Concrete. ___________ . . . 2 $3,000

1 1,5001 1, 500

Public buildings—city, county,State, and Federal5__ . . . . 1 14, 998

Public works and utilities «___ 2 75,000Schools: B r ick .._____________ 2 150, 637

1 87,0311 63,606

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 24 3, 620Frame____ _. _______ _ 19 2, 420Brick __________ . . . ___ 2 350Stone_____ _________ . . . 1 100Concrete. . . . . . . ____ 1 400Metal___________ . . . . . . 1 350

Stables and barns: Frame 1 50Stores and other mercantile

buildings_____________ __ 16 147, 750Frame__________________ 3 1,500

1 5001 5001 500

Brick.................... .............. 9 118, 5001 35,0001 35,0001 25,0001 8,000*1 5,0001 4, 5001 2, 5001 2,0001 1, 500

Stucco__ __ . . . ___ __ 1 3,000Concrete. ______ _ . . . _ 1 750Metal_______ ______ 1 4,000Reinforced concrete: Facing

not reported. _________ 1 20,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 75: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 69T a b l e A . — Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which buildiug permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1939— C on tinu e d

SOUTH C AR O L IN A

C H A R L E S T O N

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures.. 66 $750, 580Amusement and recreation

places: Frame __ __ . . . . . . 1 600Churches. _ ______ __ 5 78, 000

Frame___ ____ _____ _____ 3 16,0001 7, 5001 5,0001 3, 500

Brick.................................... 2 62,0001 47,0001 15,000

Garages, private, when sep­arate from dwelling 1 20 7,639

Frame. ____________ . 9 2,120Brick____________________ 3 1,400Concrete___ . . . 1 1,000Metal___________________ 7 3,119

Gasoline and service stations. _. 5 18,000Frame________________ 1 5,000Brick____________________ 4 13,000

1 5,0001 5, 0001 2, 000

Public works and utilities:1 1,000

Frame____ _ _ ______ 1 5,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Schools._______ _______ _____ 5 $588, 986Frame__________________ 2 16, 998

1 11,9981 5,000

Brick.. ______ ________ 1 314, 217Stucco.. . . . ________ _ 1 26, 871Concrete and brick _ _ _ 1 230, 900

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 18 4, 505Frame___________________ 15 3, 605Brick__________ _______ 2 700Concrete_____________ _ _ 1 200

Stores and other mercantilebuildings . . . ________ _. 11 47, 850

Frame___________________ 2 1, 7501 1, 0001 750

Brick..... ..................... ...... ... 7 37,1001 9,0001 7, 5001 7, 2001 5, 0001 4,0001 2, 5001 1, 900

Metal....... .................._*____ 2 9,0001 5,0001 4,000

COLUMBIA

Total nonhousekeeping resi­ Garages, private, when separatedential structures._. _______ 3 $1,006,019 from dwelling 1 _ __ ________ 24 $3, 728

Dormitories: Reinforced con­ Frame______ . . . ___ . . . 8 1, 440crete: Brick facing_____ ____ 2 506,019 Brick. 1 600

Stone_____________ _ . . . 1 2001 254, 580 Stucco________ . . . __ __ 1 3001 251, 439 M etal... ._ . . . . . . _ . . . 13 1,188

Hotels: Reinforced concrete: Gasoline and service stations__ 8 24,000Brink faring 1 500,000

Frame___________________ 1 1,800Total nonresidential structures. 84 1,822,155

Rrinlr 4 13, 700Amusement and recreation

places: Brick______________ 1 23,000 1 7,1001 3,500Factories, bakeries, ice plants, 1 2,200

laundries, and other work­ 1 900shops: Brick. _____________ 2 13, 200

Brick and stucco................. 8, 5001 9,000 31 4,200 1 5,000

Garages, public_____ _____ ___ 2 9,000 11 3,000500

Brick__________ . . . ___ 1 8,000 Office buildings, i n c l u d i n gMetal____ _______ ___ 1 1.000 banks: Brick_____________ 1 6.000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 76: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

70 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— Number and permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building permits were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type of structure and specified materials, 1989— Continued

SO U TH C A R O L IN A — Continued

COLUMBIA—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public buildings—city, county, Stores and other, etc.—Con.State, and Federal __ __ __ 2 $807, 262 Brick... _ _ __________ 16 $220,900

Structural steel: Facing not 1 125,000reported______________ 1 800, 262 1 18, 500

Not reported. _ ________ 2 1 7,000 1 15,0001 10,000

Schools ________ ______ . . . 2 702,000 1 8, 5001 7,200

Reinforced concrete: Brick 1 5,500facing _____________ __ 1 44,000 1 5,000

Structural steel: Stone fac­ 1 5,000ing____________________ 1 658,000 1 5,000

1 4,000Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 22 6, 765 1 3,200

— 1 3,000Frame______ __________ 9 1,240 1 2,750Brick___ _ ___________ 1 1,200 1 2, 250Concrete_______________ 1 3,150 1 1,000Metal___ ____. . . _ 11 1,175 Brick veneer ___________ 1 900

Stores and other mercantile M etal... ................. .......... 2 3, 400hnildings 2 0 227,200

1 2,500Frame__ . . . ___________ 1 2 , 0 0 0 1 900

GREENVILLE

Total nonhousekeeping resi­dential structures 1 $7,000

Public works and utilities: Brick_____________ ________ 7 4 $55, 822

Monasteries: Brick . . . . . . 1 7,000 1 16, 822 13, 500 13, 500 1 2 , 0 0 0

37,000

Total nonresidential structures.. 54 338,081111

1Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops: Brick ___ _

Schools: Brick ____________2 22, 501

Sheds, poultry houses, etc. . . . 1 0 5, 550' 1

116, 501

6 , 0 0 0 Frame _____ _ ______ 7 5,200Garages, private, when separate

from dwelling. ______ _. 9 1,405 1 4,0003501

Frame 7 1,130 11

300250

1111

2502502 0 0150 Brick__________________

111

1

1501 0 050

1 0 01 1 0 01 90 Metal__________________ . 2 2501 90

Brick ________________ 1 150 1 2 0 0Metal ________________ 1 125 1 50

Gasoline and service stations___ 6 23,900 Stables and barns: Frame.. . . . 1 50Brick _ ____________ 4 18,900 Stores and other mercantile

1 6 , 0 0 0buildings ______________ . 2 1 191,853

1 6 , 0 0 0 Frame _ _____ ______ 3 7,3751 3, 900

Brick and stucco_____ . .Not reported. . . _ . . .

1

11

3.0003.0002 . 0 0 0

111

3,500 2 , 0 0 0 1,875

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 77: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 7 1

T a b l e A .— N um ber and 'permit valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified materials, 193 9— Continued

SO U TH C A R O L IN A — Continued

GREENVILLE—Continued

Num- Num­Type of structure and material ber of

struc­Permit

valuation Type of structure and material ber of struc­

Permitvaluation

tures tures

Stores and other, etc.—Con. Stores and other, etc.—Con.Brick ______________ _ 12 $168,578 Brick veneer __ 1 $1, 500

11

30.00025.000 Metal___________________ 3 13,000

1111

23, 328 18,000 17,000 16, 850

111

9,600 2,000 1,400

32 23,0001 5,000

4,900 3, 500

Not reported____________ 2 1,40011 1 8001 2,000 1 600

SPARTANBURG

Total nonresidential struc­tures. _ . _ .... _ _ 69 $535, 401

Churches _________ .... 3 9, 000Frame. . _ . _______ 1 2,000Stone. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 3, 000Stone veneer__ _ ______ 1 4, 000

Garages, public: Brick _ 1 2,000

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling 1_____ _ __ 38 5,865

Frame. _ _______ __ __ 36 4,745Brick____________________ 1 920Metal. ____ ________ 1 200

Gasoline and service stations__ 2 6,000Brick_______ ____ ____ . 1 3, 000Not reported . . . ______ 1 3,000

Public works and utilities_____ 4 227,440Frame _ _____________ 1 5, 500

Brick____ ___________ 2 40, 0001 20,0001 20,000

Brick and stone.. _ _______ 1 181,940

Schools: Brick______ ______ 4 $222,3521 123, 8851 49,4421 34, 6301 14, 395

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.:Frame _________ ______ 2 800

1 4001 400

Stables and barns: Frame. ___ 1 100Stores and other mercantile

buildings . . . __ ___________ 14 61,844F ram e..._______________ 2 3, 000

1 1,8001 1,200

Brick. ............................ ...... 11 53, 5441 17, 4001 8, 3441 8, 0001 4, 9001 4, 0001 2, 4001 2, 0001 2, 0001 2, 0001 2, 0001 500

Tile___________________ . 1 5, 300

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 78: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

72 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A.— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified materials, 198 9—Continued

V IR G IN IA

LYNCHBURG

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonhousekeeping resi-dential structures_____ _ 1 $34,840

Nurses’ homes: Brick veneer,__ 1 34, 840

Total nonresidentia l struc­tures. _ _________ _______ 68 282, 224

Amusement and recreationplaces *. _____________ 2 169, 000

1 150, 0001 19,000

Churches: Frame _______ 1 2,000

Garages, private, when sepa­rate from dwelling 1 _ 30 5,005

Frame___________________ 23 2,015Concrete.. . . . . . . 1 2, 500Metal.. . . . . __________ 4 365Not reported.. ___ 2 125

Gasoline and service stations:Concrete_____________ _____ 2 10,250

1 7, 2501 3,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Institutions: Brick. 1 $19, 504Schools: Frame... ._ . . . . 1 5.000Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1-- . _ 20 4,140

Frame... . . . __ ______ 14 1,475Concrete. . _____ ________ 1 400Metal______________ _____ 4 2, 215Not reported____________ 1 50

Stables and barns ______. . . 3 3, 525Frame___________________ 1 950Stone. ____________ _ __ 1 75Concrete____________ . . . 1 2,500

Stores and other mercantilebuildings. .. 8 63,800

Brick__________________ 1 18, 000Concrete_______________ 5 32,000

1 18, 0001 4, 0001 3, 8001 3, 5001 2,700

Metal....... ................... ........ 1 1, 800Not reported_____________ 1 12,000

NEWPORT NEWS

T ota l nonresidential struc­tures . . . . ___ 59 $112,263

Amusement and recreationplaces: Brick... . . ____ _ 1 45,000

Churches: Brick________ ___ 1 15, 600Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work-shops.. ____ _ ____. . . _. 3 8.700

Brick___________ ____ 1 1,500Concrete.. . . 1 5, 500M e ta l..____ __ . . . ___ 1 1, 700

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling 1 _ .. _ _. 14 1,734

Frame___ . . . _______ 8 603Brick________ _ . . ... 1 736Metal_________ _ ___ 5 395

Gasoline and service stations__ 5 $15,800Brick......................... .......... 4 10,800

1 5,0001 4, 7001 6001 500

Concrete_________________ 1 5,000Office buildings, including

banks: Brick 1 22, 400Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 33 1,029

Frame_________________ _ 29 903Brick_______________ 1 60Metal . . . . _________ . 3 66

Stores and other mercantilebuildings: Brick___________ 1 2,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 79: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 73T a b l e A ,— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified materials, 1 9 3 9— Continued

V IR G IN IA -—C ontinued

NORFOLK

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonres ident ia l struc-tures_ ____ ___ _ 324 $731,430

Amusement and recreationplaces: B rick______ ____ . 2 44, 950

1 30, 4001 14,550

Churches: Brick_____________ 4 111, 2001 52,0001 25, 0001 20, 000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work-

1 14, 200

shops__ _ _ _. 6 157, 500Brick____________________ 5 150, 000

1 65, 0001 50, 0001 25. 0001 6,0001 4,000

Metal_____________ .___ 1 7,500Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling 1____ 215 35,954Frame- _____ ____ _ 176 25,844Brick____________________ 8 5. 275Concrete _ 2 450Metal________________ 29 4,385

Gasoline and service stations__ 16 44,548Frame __ . 1 1,000Brick _ _ _ _ __ 11 35, 500

1 7,0001 6, 5001 4,5001 4,0001 3, 5001 3, 5001 2,0001 1,5001 1,0001 1,0001 1,000

Concrete______________ __ 4 8,0481 3,0001 1,9981 1, 8001 1,250

Institutions________________ 2 89,075Brick___ __ __ _____ . _ 1 75,275Brick and frame- . . . 1 13,800

Office buildings, includingbanks: Brick _ 1 8,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 32 4,740Frame,.- . . _ _________ 21 2,505Brick-.. _ ____ 1 300Concrete__ _ __________ 2 600Metal__________ ______ 7 1,035Glass. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ j 1 300

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stables and barns: Metal- ___ 1 $126Stores and other mercantile

buildings___________ _____ 32 232,627Frame_____ ___________ 6 29, 600

1 17, 5001 6,0001 2, 5001 2,0001 1,0001 600

Brick_____________ _______ 12 123, 9781 20, 0001 16,0001 15, 9001 13, 9001 13,0001 10, 0001 9, 9781 7, 7001 6, 0001 5,0001 3, 5001 3,000

Brick and frame........ ......... 1 1, 500Concrete __ _ __________ 8 62, 349

1 17, 6491 16,0001 10,0001 6, 0001 6,0001 3, 6001 2,4001 700

Metal__________________ 5 15, 2001 10,0001 2,0001 1, 5001 1,0001 700

All other nonresidential struc­tures: Fences,_ ___ _ _ __ 13 2, 710

Frame___________ _______ 4 5201 3001 2001 151 5

Brick....... ......................... 1 450M etal________ ____ 8 1,740

1 5001 4001 3251 225I 1501 751 501 15

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 80: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

74 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified materials, 1 9 8 9— Continued

VIR G IN IA— Continued

PETERSBURG

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures. 35 $187,825Churches: Frame____ _ _. - 1 1, 500Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops______________________ 3 16,100

Brick____ ___________ . . 2 6,1001 4, 5001 1,600

Concrete_________________ 1 10,000Garages, private, when sepa­

rate from dwelling *_________ 16 2,140Frame____ ____ . . . ----- 10 865Brick________ ___ 1 500M etal______ - __ 4 700Not reported---------------- _ 1 75

Gasoline and service stations__ 5 23,800Brick------------------- ------ 4 20,800

1 7,5001 6, 5001 6,0001 800

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service, etc.—Con.Brick and stucco___ _ _ _ 1 $3,000

Office buildings, includingbanks: Brick_____________ 1 20,000

Public buildings—city, county,State, and Federal: Brick___ 1 22,615

Public works and utilities5____ 1 6,095Sheds, poultry houses, etc_____ 4 3, 575

Frame___________________ 3 575i 2501 1751 150

B rick_____ ______ _______ 1 3,000Stores and other mercantile

buildings. ___ ___ 3 92,000Brick___ _ __ _ _______ 1 1, 500Metal____ _____ 1 90,000Glass___________________ 1 500

PORTSMOUTH

Total nonresidential structures. _ Churches__________________ _

48 $925,9862 24, 000

Brick___ _ ------- --------- 1 19, 000Brick veneer_____ _ ____ 1 5, 000

Factories, bakeries, ice plants,laundries, and other work­shops: Concrete. _ ------------- 1 1, 500

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling 1______ ___ 27 3,415

Frame _ _ ------- ------------ 11 1,000Brick_____ _______ 2 950Metal.. __ _____________ 14 1, 465

Gasoline and service stations---- 3 17,850Brick___ ___...................... 1 6,000

Public buiidings—Continued.Brick. _____ . ___ __ 2 1 $112, 280Metal. - - _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 1 165, 630Reinforced concrete: Ce­

ment facing__ _____ 2 1 337,167Sheds, poultry houses, etc. . . . 6 1,050

Frame___________________ 3 7001 3501 2501 100

Metal.................................... 3 3501 2001 1001 50

Concrete.... ........................ 2 11,8501 7, 350

Public buildings—city, county1 4, 500

State, and Federal--------------- 5 870,071Frame________________ _ 2 254, 994

2 1 147, 2242 1 107, 770

Stores and other mercantile buildings__________________

Frame___________________4 8,1001 850

Brick. 3 7,2501 5,000] 1,250J 1,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 81: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 75T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non -

residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified m aterials, 1 9 3 9 — Continued

V IR G IN IA — Continued

RICHMOND

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures. 391 $5,172,035Amusement and recreation

places______________ ______ 5 5,700Frame______ ________ 1 1,000Brick_______________ ____ 1 2,400Not reported_____________ 3 2,300

1 8003 2 1, 500

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work-shops___ _________ _ 8 133, 750

Brick_____ ____ __________ 4 63, 5001 40, 0001 17, 0001 4,0001 2, 500

Concrete_________________ 1 7, 750Metal __ _________ ___ 1 2, 500Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing ___ _ ___ __ 1 53,000Not reported_________ 1 7,000

Garages, public______________ 7 22,850Brick____________________ 5 17, 350

1 10, 2001 2,7501 2,0001 1,4001 1, 000

Concrete_________________ 2 5, 5001 3, 5001 2, 000

Garages, private, when separatefrom dwelling 1_______ __ 122 23, 620

Brick____________________ 16 5, 883Stone - _______ _____ 1 350Brick and stone__________ 1 300Concrete_______ _ . __ __ 6 1,445Metal____ _____________ 98 15, 542Not reported____ . . . _____ 1 100

Gasoline and service stations__ 22 83,850Brick____________________ 17 63, 350

1 9, 0001 7,0001 5, 5001 5,1001 4, 0001 4,0001 3, 7501 3, 5001 3, 5001 3, 4001 3,0001 3,0001 2,8001 2,0001 1,800

3 2 2,000

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service, etc.—Con.Concrete_________________ 5 $20, 500

1 6,0001 4,0001 4,0001 3, 5001 3,000

Institutions: Structural steel:stone facing_____ ___________ 1 1,889, 489

Public works and utilities____ 11 881, 757Brick............................... 3 9,000

1 6,0001 2,0001 1,000

Concrete............................. . 5 525, 75732 433, 900

1 67,9391 22, 9181 1,000

Metal_____________ _____ _ 1 7,000Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing_________________ 2 340,0001 190,0001 150,000

Schools______________________ 2 1, 657, 357Brick_______ ___________ 1 212, 699Reinforced concrete: Brick

facing __ __ _ __ 1 1, 444, 658Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 159 14, 613

Frame___________ _______ 26 873Brick_______ ______ __ _ 2 839Concrete__________ _____ 5 2,910Metal. _ _ _______________ 116 9,071Not reported__________ 10 920

Stores and other mercantilebuildings._ . . . _. ________ 54 459, 049

Frame.......................... ........ 8 107,6003 2 36,0003 2 31,6003 4 40, 000

Brick.. ____________ ______ 29 245,9541 24, 9001 18, 3761 18,0001 15, 5001 15, 2801 15, 250

See footnotes at end of table.

2 7 1 7 1 1 °— 42------- 6

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 82: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

76 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non- residential structures for which building perm its were iss ed in South Atlantic cities, by type o f structure and specified m aterials, 1939■— Continued

VIR G IN IA — Continued RICHM OND—Continued

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Stores and others, etc.—Con. Stores and others, etc.—Con..Brick—Continued. Brick and stone._________ 3 3 $5,000

1 $14,9001 13,0001 13,000 Concrete_________________ 3 4, 4001 11, 2751 8, 400 1 3,0001 8, 000 1 9001 8,000 1 5001 7,0001 6, 500 Metal................................... 10 93, 6951 6, 5001 6,000 1 20,0001 6,000 1 16, 0001 5, 500 1 12,0001 5,000 »2 20,0001 5, 000 1 8,0001 4,000 1 8,0001 3.000 1 7,0001 2. 000 1 2,0001 1. 500 1 6951 1, 473

32 2,000 Glass............ ........................ 1 2,4001 600

ROANOKE

Total nonresidential struc­tures______________________ 182 $272,852

Amusement and recreationplaces__ 3 14,000

Brick___ _ _ _ . _ 1 7,000Concrete__ . . . _ 1 1, 500Metal___________________ 1 5, 500

Churches: Brick ______ __ _ 1 12,000Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work­shops____ _____ _ _ 4 40, 250

B rick______ _ _ _ 1 35,000Concrete _ _ _______ 1 3,000Metal. __ _______________ 2 2,250

1 1, 2501 1,000

Garages, public----- --------- ------ 6 48, 407Brick_____ _____ ________ 4 41, 807

1 31, 2371 5, 0001 4, 5701 1,000

Concrete________________ 2 6,6001 4,8001 1,800

Garages, private, when sepa­rate from dwelling C ______ 121 19, 997

Frame___ _ _ _ ________ 39 3,462Brick_____ _ ______ __ 47 13, 210Stone., _________ ___ ___ 1 125Brick and stucco __ ______ 1 250Concrete ._ __ __ ___ ___ 24 2,180Not reported.______ _ _ _ 9 770

Gasoline and service stations__ 5 $23,875Brick.

Concrete_________________Office buildings, including

banks: Brick_______________Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1___

Frame___________________Brick and stucco_________Concrete________________Metal___________________Not reported_____________

Stores and other mercantile buildings__________________

Brick____________________

Metal

Not reported.

4 ____ 22,2251 6,5751 6,2501 5,4001 4,0001 1,650

1 9,00027 4,27211 1,2771 4002 5258 1,7855 285

14 101,0517 86,1751 35,0001 17,5001 15,0001 7,5001 6,1751 3,5001 1,5006 12,8761 4,8001 3,0001 2,8001 1,2001 5551 5211 2,000

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 83: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 7 7

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation of nonhousekeeping residential and non - residential structures for which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, b y typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 98 9— Continued

WEST VIR G IN IA

CHARLESTON

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Totai nonresidentiai structures.. _ 215 $1,251,099Amusement and recreation

places: Brick. _-------------------- 1 35,000Churches____ . . . . . . . _ ___ 2 3, 500

Frame ._ ______________ - 1 2,000Brick veneer ___________ 1 1,500

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, laundries, and other work­shops: B rick .._____ _. _ . . 5 49,100

1 15,8001 14,0001 12,0001 6,0001 1, 300

Garages, public_________ ____ 3 12, 200Brick______ _____ _______ 2 9,000

1 5.0004.0001

Concrete. . . . . . . _____ 1 3, 200Garages, private, when separate

from dwelling K ________ _ 161 39, 975Frame.._ _______________ 95 21,330Brick____________________ 11 3, 960Stone___ _ __________ 2 1,000Stucco... ___________. . . 3 1, 700Brick and frame______ _ 1 150Concrete. ____________ 38 10,465Metal__________ _______ 11 1, 380

Gasoline and service stations__ 3 13, 500Stucco--------------- ------ -- ... 2 7,000

1 3, 5001 3, 500

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Gasoline and service, etc.—Con.Concrete _______ . . . . 1 $6,500

Public buildings—city, county,State, and Federal: Brick___ 4 112,000

1 43,0001 23,0001 23, 0001 23,000

Public works and utilities......... 2 204, 624Stone__ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . 1 1,000Structural steel and con­

crete. ._ ____________ 1 203, 624Schools: Brick__ ____________ 3 710, 900

1 586, 5221 70,4391 53, 939

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 24 10, 550Frame.. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ 15 2, 675Brick_____ _ ___________ 1 500Concrete. . _____ _______ 5 2, 025Metal________ . . . ______ 2 5,150Glass ________________ 1 200

Stores and other mercantilebuildings.. . . . ______ _ _ 7 59, 750

Frame______ ____________ 2 1, 7501 1,0001 750

Brick___ ____ _____ ______ 2 53, 0001 50,0001 3,000

Brick veneer ___________ 1 1,000Concrete. ______________ 1 3,000Glass________ ____ _______ 1 1,000

CLARKSBURG

Total nonresidentiai structures. _ _ 47 $253, 928

Garages, public: Brick________ 1 2,500

Garages, private, when sepa­rate from dwelling 1_________ 29 7,488

Frame___ ____ __________ 18 4,063Brick_______ __________ 1 100Stone .. . _______________ 1 350Concrete_______________ 5 1, 325Tile.. . . ._ .......... _. . 2 550Not reported_____________ 2 1,100

Gasoline and service stations__ 3 3,700

Frame___ _______. . . . 1 2,000Concrete___ ___________ . 1 700Tile_____________________ 1 1,000

Office buildings, includingbanks: Brick and stone_____ 1 200,000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc_____ 5 $435Frame____ _____________ 4 395

1 2501 1001 251 20

Not reported________ _ __ 1 40Stores and other mercantile

buildings_________ ________ 6 39, 750Frame____ ____ _______ 1 750Brick. __________________ 1 24,000Concrete_____________ ___ 3 14,000

1 6,0001 5, 0001 3, 000

Metal____________________ 1 1,000All other nonresidentiai struc­

tures: Retaining walls.. _ . . 2 55Stone _____ . . . 1 30Concrete_________________ 1 25

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 84: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

78 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY, 1939

T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation o f nonhousekeeping residential and non - residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1989-—Continued.

WEST VIR G IN IA — Continued

HUNTINGTON

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures.. 190 $774, 254Amusement and recreation

places: Metal _____________ 1 2,000Churches: Brick veneer_______ 1 3,000Factories, bakeries, ice plants,

laundries, and other work-shops: Concrete . . ------------ 1 17,000

Garages, private, when sepa­rate from dwelling U _______ 129 21,441

Frame_____ ______ _______ 78 7,179Brick____________________ 28 8,970Brick and stone_____ . . . 2 480Concrete_________ _______ 17 4,037Metal.. _ ---------------------- 1 200Tile_______________ _____ - 1 400Not reported_____________ 2 175

Gasoline and service stations— 8 29,000Brick__________ _____ . . . 1 2,000

Stucco............................... . 2 10,0001 6,0001 4,000

Concrete_________________ 4 16, 5001 5, 5001 5,0001 5,0001 1,000

Not reported-------------------- 1 500Public buildings—city, county,

State, and Federal: Brick----- 1 180,722

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Public works and utilities: Con­crete ______________________ 7 $418,700

1 96, 7001 64, 500

58, 50011 55,0001 53,0001 46, 0001 45, 000

Sheds, poultry houses, etc.1____ 26 9,091Frame______ . . . . . . . 21 3,616Brick_______________ . . . 1 3,000Concrete . . . ________ 2 2, 330Metal___________________ 1 120Not reported.. . . . . . . _. 1 25

Stables and barns: Frame. 1 50Stores and other mercantile

buildings. . ._ ___. . . . 15 93, 250Frame___________________ 3 3,000

1 2,0001 5001 500

Brick___________________ 8 78, 7501 40, 0001 12,0001 7, 6001 7,0001 6,0001 4,1501 1,0001 1,000

Brick and frame__________ 1 6,500G lass.._________ ____ _ _ 1 1,000Title____________________ 1 3,000Not reported.. ._ ._ ___ 1 1,000

PARKERSBURG

Total nonresidential structures.. 54 $376,290Amusement and recreation

places: Brick....... ................... 2 30,9501 30,0001 950

Garages, public........................... 2 4,000Frame___ _ _ _ _______ 1 1,000Concrete__ . . . ___________ 1 3,000

Garages, private, when sep­arate from dwelling 1________ 31 11,145

Frame________ ____ ____ 17 ' 3,945Brick________ . . . ______ 1 1,500Concrete____ ________ 12 5,400Metal.. _________________ 1 300

Gasoline and service stations:Brick__________ ____ ____ _ 1 12,000

Institutions: Brick___________ 1 94, 428Office buildings, including

banks: Brick______________ 1 16,000Public works and utilities.. . . . 2 33,880

Brick____________________ 1 32, 300Concrete____ . . . 1 1, 580

Sheds, poultry houses, etc___ __ 7 $2,062Frame______ _______ 2 550

1 3001 250

Brick____________________ 1 500Concrete........................ ...... 2 512

1 3001 212

Not reported_____________ 2 5001 3001 200

Stables and barns: Frame... _. 1 250Stores and other mercantile

buildings______________ 6 171, 575Brick__________________ _ 4 168, 800

1 125,0001 35,0001 7, 5001 1, 300

Concrete...................... . . . 2 2, 7751 1,8751 900

See footnotes at end of table.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 85: bls_0689-v5_1942.pdf

APPENDIX 79T a b l e A .— N um ber and perm it valuation af nonhousekeeping residential and non-

residential structures fo r which building perm its were issued in South Atlantic cities, by typ e o f structure and specified materials, 1 93 9— Continued.

WEST VIR G IN IA — Continued

WHEELING

Type of structure and materialNum­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation Type of structure and material

Num­ber of struc­tures

Permitvaluation

Total nonresidential structures. 44 $157, 440 Office buildings, includingbanks: Brick and stone . _ 1 $10,000

Amusement and recreationplaces: B rick .____________ 1 26,000 Public buildings—city, county,

Factories, bakeries, ice plants, State, and Federal: Brick____ 2 34,635laundries, and other work­shops: Brick _____ _____ _ 2 25,000 1 17, 345

1 17, 2901 20,0001 5,000 Stores and other mercantile

Garages, public: T i le . . .______ 1 2,600 buildings_________ _______ 7 37, 800Garages, private, when separate -n, 1 d nonfrom dwelling 1 . . . . . . 27 13, 405 T i cil-QG____ ______ —______ __ 1 jij uuu

Frame _ _. ___________ 9 2, 725 Brick 4 27,000B rin k 2 1, 200Brick and stone__________ 1 5 500 1 18, 000Tile_____________________ 15 3,980 1 4,500

Gasoline and service stations__ 3 8,000 11

3,0001,500

Brick______ _ ________ 1 3, 000Concrete______ ______ 1 1, 000 Metal_________ __ 1 800Tile_____________________ 1 4,000 Tile_____________ 1 6,000

1 Due to the large number of structures of this type for which permits were issued, data are not shown for individual structures.

2 Federal construction.3 Individual valuations not available.4 Federal construction, individuaf valuations not available.5 Type of material not reported.6 Type of material and individual valuations not available.7 Waterworks and disposal plant buildings sponsored by the City of Greenville, N. C., located outside the

corporate limits of the city.

O

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis