Top Banner
BlowFish: Dynamic Storage-Performance Tradeoin Data Stores Anurag Khandelwal, Rachit Agarwal, Ion Stoica
110

BlowFish Dynamic Storage-Performance · BlowFish: Dynamic Storage-Performance Tradeoff in Data Stores Anurag Khandelwal, Rachit Agarwal, Ion Stoica

Oct 23, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • BlowFish: 
Dynamic Storage-Performance

    Tradeoff in Data Stores

    Anurag Khandelwal, Rachit Agarwal, Ion Stoica

  • High-Throughput Data Stores

  • High-Throughput Data Stores

    Key-Value 
Stores

    BigTable

  • High-Throughput Data Stores

    Key-Value 
Stores

    BigTable

    NoSQL 
Stores

  • High-Throughput Data Stores

    Key-Value 
Stores

    BigTable

    NoSQL 
Stores

    High Throughput: Queries/Second

  • Existing Data Stores

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressedmore cache

    High Throughput

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressed

    Compressed

    Low Throughput

    less cache

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressed

    Compressed

    10x

    10x

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressed

    Compressed

    Unachievable points

  • Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressed

    Compressed

    Unachievable points

    Switching between the two incurs high latency & CPU

    Compressio

    nDECompression

  • Leads to degraded performance when underlying workload or infrastructure changes

    Existing Data Stores

    Storage

    Throughput

    Uncompressed

    Compressed

    Unachievable points

    Switching between the two incurs high latency & CPU

    Compressio

    nDECompression

  • A Motivating Example

  • A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Ideal

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Ideal

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    IdealCompressed + Uncompressed

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    IdealCompressed + Uncompressed

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    IdealCompressed + Uncompressed

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Not Cached

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    IdealCompressed + Uncompressed

    Selective Replication: #Replicas α Load

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Not Cached

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    Ideal

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Compressed + Uncompressed

    Selective Replication: #Replicas α Load

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Not Cached

    Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    Ideal

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Wasted Cache!

    Compressed + Uncompressed

    Selective Replication: #Replicas α Load

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Not Cached

    Not Cached Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    Ideal

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Wasted Cache!

    Compressed + Uncompressed

    Selective Replication: #Replicas α Load

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Load changes over time

    Not Cached

    Not Cached Not Cached

  • 1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    A Motivating Example

    Object

    Load

    Load across items heavily skewed

    Wasted Cache!

    Ideal

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Wasted Cache!

    Compressed + Uncompressed

    Selective Replication: #Replicas α Load

    Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Load changes over time Degraded performance→

    Not Cached

    Not Cached Not Cached

  • BlowFish

    Storage

    Throughput

    Compressed

    Uncompressed

  • BlowFish

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

    Storage

    Throughput BlowFish

    Compressed

    Uncompressed

  • BlowFish

    Dynamic Navigation

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

    Storage

    Throughput BlowFish

    Compressed

    Uncompressed

  • BlowFish

    Dynamic Navigation

    Applications in Several Classical Systems Problems

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

    Storage

    Throughput BlowFish

    Compressed

    Uncompressed

  • Storage

    Throughput

  • Storage-Performance Tradeoff

    Storage

    Throughput

  • Background

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores: Sampled Values

    Sampled 
Array

    UNSampled Values

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

    Auxiliary 
Arrays

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

    Auxiliary 
Arrays

    ‣ Small

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

    Auxiliary 
Arrays

    ‣ Small‣ Compute unsampled

    values on the fly

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

    Auxiliary 
Arrays

    Sampling Rate (α)

    ‣ Small‣ Compute unsampled

    values on the fly

    Sampling Rate proxy for Storage & Performance

  • Background

    Builds on Succinct [NSDI’15]

    Succinct stores:

    Sampled 
Array

    Auxiliary 
Arrays

    Sampling Rate (α)

    ‣ Small‣ Compute unsampled

    values on the fly

    Storage ≈ OriginalSize/α

    Latency ≈ α

    Sampling Rate proxy for Storage & Performance

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    9 12RATE = 8

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    15 0 8 5RATE = 2

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    15 0 8 5RATE = 2

    Different combination of layers

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • OriginalSampled 
Array 9 15 3 0 12 8 14 5

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    15 0 8 5RATE = 2

    Different combination of layers Different points on tradeoff curve

    Inspired by multi-layered video encoding techniques

    Layered Sampled Array

    Rate = 2

  • Technical Details

  • Technical Details

  • Technical Details

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

    ‣ How should partitions share cache across servers?

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

    ‣ How should partitions share cache across servers?

    ‣ How should requests be scheduled across replicas?

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

    ‣ How should partitions share cache across servers?

    ‣ How should requests be scheduled across replicas?

    Unified Solution: Back-pressure style scheduling

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

    ‣ How should partitions share cache across servers?

    Cache proportional to load,

    ‣ How should requests be scheduled across replicas?

    Unified Solution: Back-pressure style scheduling

  • Technical Details

    ‣ How should partitions share cache on a server?

    ‣ How should partitions share cache across servers?

    Cache proportional to load,

    ‣ How should requests be scheduled across replicas?

    Unified Solution: Back-pressure style scheduling

    without explicit coordination

  • Storage

    Throughput

  • Dynamic Navigationof tradeoff curve

    Storage

    Throughput

  • Layer Additions & Deletions

  • 9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    15 0 8 5RATE = 2

    Layer Additions & Deletions

  • 9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    Layer Additions & Deletions

    Layer Deletions: simple

  • RATE = 2

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    Layer Additions & Deletions

    Layer Addition:

  • RATE = 2

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    Unsampled values already computed during query execution

    Layer Additions & Deletions

    Layer Addition:

  • RATE = 2

    9 12RATE = 83 14RATE = 4

    815

    Unsampled values already computed during query execution

    Layer Additions & Deletions

    Layer Addition:

    Layers in LSA populated opportunistically!!

  • Assumptions & Limitations

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

    get() search()put() delete() regex()

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

    get() search()put() delete()

    ‣ Queries do not touch all servers

    regex()

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

    get() search()put() delete()

    ‣ Queries do not touch all servers

    regex()

    Many systems employ sharding schemes to avoid touching all servers, e.g., [Schism, VLDB’10]

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

    get() search()put() delete()

    ‣ Queries do not touch all servers

    ‣ System is not network-bottlenecked

    regex()

    Many systems employ sharding schemes to avoid touching all servers, e.g., [Schism, VLDB’10]

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    ‣ Functionality close to state-of-the-art NoSQL stores

    get() search()put() delete()

    ‣ Queries do not touch all servers

    ‣ System is not network-bottlenecked

    regex()

    [MICA, NSDI’14] → True for most data stores today

    Many systems employ sharding schemes to avoid touching all servers, e.g., [Schism, VLDB’10]

  • Applications

  • ApplicationsLook at classical systems problems through a new “lens”

  • Spatial Skew

  • Spatial SkewLoad distribution across partitions is heavily skewed

  • Object

    Load

    1Compressed

    Wasted Cache!

    Spatial SkewLoad distribution across partitions is heavily skewed

    #Replicas α Load

    Selective Replication

  • Spatial SkewLoad distribution across partitions is heavily skewed

    #Replicas α Load

    Selective Replication

    BlowFish

    Fractionally change storage just enough to meet load

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Object

    Load

  • Spatial SkewLoad distribution across partitions is heavily skewed

    #Replicas α Load

    Selective Replication

    BlowFish

    Fractionally change storage just enough to meet load

    1.5x higher throughput than Selective Replication,

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Object

    Load

  • Spatial SkewLoad distribution across partitions is heavily skewed

    #Replicas α Load

    Selective Replication

    BlowFish

    Fractionally change storage just enough to meet load

    1.5x higher throughput than Selective Replication,

    within 10% of optimal

    1Compressed

    Uncompressed10

    Object

    Load

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failuresStudy on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failures

    Replica creation delayed by 15 mins

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failures

    Replica creation delayed by 15 mins

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

    Leads to variation in load over time

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failures

    Replica creation delayed by 15 mins

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

    Data Partitions Request Queues

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

    Leads to variation in load over time

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failures

    Replica creation delayed by 15 mins

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

    Data Partitions Request Queues

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

    Leads to variation in load over time

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Transient failures → 90% of failures

    Replica creation delayed by 15 mins

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

    Data Partitions Request Queues

    Study on Facebook Warehouse Cluster

    [HotStorage’13]

    Leads to variation in load over time

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Changes in Spatial Skew

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Changes in Spatial SkewOperation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Changes in Spatial Skew

    Load Throughput

    Operation

    s / second

    0

    600

    1200

    1800

    2400

    3000

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Request Queue Siz

    e0K

    10K

    20K

    30K

    40K

    50K

    Time (mins)

    0 30 60 90 120

    Adapts to 3x higher load in < 5 mins

    Replica#1

    Replica#2

    Replica#3

  • Summary

    Storage

    Throughput

  • Summary

    Storage

    Throughput

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

  • Summary

    Storage

    Throughput

    Dynamic Navigation

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

  • Summary

    Storage

    Throughput

    Dynamic Navigation

    Applications in Several Classical Systems Problems

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

  • Summary

    Thank You! Questions?

    Storage

    Throughput

    Dynamic Navigation

    Applications in Several Classical Systems Problems

    Smooth Tradeoff Curve

  • Backup Slides