January 30, 2008 BLOOMFIELD PARKING DECK STUDY
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
January 30, 2008
BLOOMFIELD PARKING DECK STUDY
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 2
Purpose of Study
• Determine the most appropriate sites for parking deck development in downtown Bloomfield
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 3
Purpose of Presentation
• Explain process and rationale used to develop the recommended parking deck sites
• Answer questions• Receive feedback
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 4
Work PlanInitial Screening of Sites
• Conduct an initial screening of potential parking deck sites
• 14 sites were selected• Based on size, location, proximity to
activity centers
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 5
Site Characteristics
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 6
Site Capacity / Obstacle Data
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 7
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 8
First Round Consensus
• Goal 1 – 14 to 6 • Strongest sites were located between
Bloomfield Avenue and the train station• Ability to support both the central business
district and the train station • Results of public outreach
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 9
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 10
Results of Public Outreach
• 72.4% of dots were placed between Bloomfield Avenue and the rail corridor
Of those 72.4%.........• 43.6% Lackawanna Lot• 25.4% Royal Theatre Lot• 25.4% Farrand Street Lot• 5.6% Conger Street Lot
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 11
Lackawanna & Royal /Farrand Lot SchemesOriginal “Block Outs”
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 12
Round 2 Sites
• Input BPA Board• Input from public meetings• Input from Newworks and VRG• 6 functional plans• 4 in the Royal Theatre Lot / Farrand area• 2 in the Lackawanna Lot area
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 13
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 14
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 15
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 16
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 17
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 18
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 19
Comparing the Sites – 10 Criteria
• Proximity to areas deficient in parking• Capacity potential• Efficiency of structure• Proximity to train station• Proximity to CBD / Shopping District• Ease of site assembly• Circulation, access, ingress / egress• Consistency with public outreach• Ability to integrate w/ Redevelopment / Create value• Parking and traffic impacts during construction
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 20
Goals Achievement Matrix
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 21
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 22
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 23
LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC 24
Related Documents
