GENETICS AND BEHAVIOUR
Apr 08, 2016
GENETICS AND
BEHAVIOUR
From Gene to Brain to Experience to Behavior
ENVIRONMENT
BEHAVIOURAL GENETICS – WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
Humans share 93% of their genes with the rhesus macaque monkey and about 99% with rats – but what about the rest?
GENETICS AND ENVIRONMENT
THE CHALLENGE IS TO …
Discuss the extent to which genetics influence behaviour. Try and work out how much of a certain behaviour is inherited and how much is environmental.
? ?
WHAT IS INHERITED?
• Intelligence• Depression• Risk-taking
behaviour• Homosexuality• Problem solving
skills• Agoraphobia
Which of the
following do you
think might
be inherited? Why?
HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS WITH GENETIC COMPONENTS Physical: height, mass, obesity, voice
tone, blood pressure, tooth decay, athletic ability, age of death
Intellectual: memory, age of language acquisition, reading difficulties
Emotional/disorders: shyness, extroversion, emotionality, neuroticism, schizophrenia, anxiety, alcoholism
INTERACTION BETWEEN INHERITANCE AND ENVIRONMENT
Genetics (inherited)
Environment (experienced)
Behaviour
Diathesis-stress m
odel
THE DIATHESIS-STRESS MODEL Is used to explain the origin of depression This model argues that depression may
be a result of the interaction of a “genetic vulnerability” and traumatic environmental stimuli in early childhood.
Not everyone who experiences a traumatic childhood or has someone in the family who becomes depressed, will be depressed, therefore there in no single cause-and-effect relationship between genes and behaviour
GENETIC RESEARCH
Are in large extent based on correlational studies – twin studies, family studies and adoption studies.
CORRELATION STUDIES – WHO DO RESEARCHERS STUDY?
Twin studies
• MZ twins• DZ twins
Family studies
• (Grand)parents
• Siblings
Adoption
studies
• Adopted family
• Biological family
TECHNIQUESComparing Monozygotic
twins (MZ) with Dyzygotic twins (DZ). Since MZ twins have identical DNA, there
should be a higher concordance rate .
Comparing MZ twins reared together vs. MZ twins reared
apart. Why might this be better than the first
technique?
Using correlational research to establish a genetic argument for the origin of human behaviour
Twin studie
s
• Monozygotic (identical)
• Dizygotic (fraternal)
• Concordant trait• Both members of
a twin pair share a trait
• Discordant trait• A twin pair does
not share a trait
GENETIC RESEARCH Is to a large extent based on
correlational studiesWhat is that?
CORRELATIONCorrelations show the relationship between two variables. There is no manipulation of an IV, so cause and
effect are not established.
A correlation of +1.0 means as x increases, y increases. -1.0 means
that x increases, y decreases.
In twin research, we expect to find a higher correlational than when comparing a child to someone
outside of the family.
STRENGTHS OF TWIN STUDIES
Twin studies have produced a great deal of data in support of biological roots of disorders; this has helped psychologists to stress prevention for those who are vulnerable to such disorders.
There is a high cross-cultural reliability of concordance levels.
LIMITATIONS OF TWIN STUDIES MZ twins are rarely separated at birth
and raised in a totally different environment, yet this is really necessary to substantiate claims. MZ twins reared together share many of the same experiences. DZ twins reared together may not share the same experiences due to levels of attractiveness or temperament.
ADOPTION STUDIES
Adoption studies tend to compare the adopted child with the biological mother and the adoptive mother to determine which has the higher concordance rate for a given behaviour.Why might adoption studies at times be preferrable to twin studies?
STRENGTHS OF ADOPTION STUDIES
Adoption studies allow researchers to isolate variables. If a biological mother has no contact since birth and still matches for a specific trait - for example, the adopted child’s IQ is better than the adoptive mother and in concordance with the birth mother - this is strong evidence that genes play a significant role in the development of this trait.
LIMITATIONS OF ADOPTION STUDIES Selective placement is a problem.
Babies tend to placed with families similar in background to the natural parents.
Adopted children – as well as twins - are not representative of all children.
The act of being given up for adoption may affect the child’s behaviour.
FAMILY STUDIES A more representative sample of the
general population. A child inherits half of its genes from the
father and half from the mother Sibling will share 50% with each other Grandparents will share 25% with their
grandparents First cousins will share 12,5% with each
other
FAMILY STUDIES These different degrees of genetic
relatedness are compared with behaviour.
For example: if one study intelligence and believe that IQ has a lot to do with the genes, there should be a strong correlation in IQ between children and their mother and fathers, but a weak
correlation in IQ with their second cousins and if any with strangers
WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE?
SO, what did you get on your SATs? Jane said she got a 2350…that means she’s
really smart, right?Does it?
Is it the ability to use reason and logic? Is it the ability to write and speak clearly? Is it limited to one’s performance in school? Is it behavior in social situations? How about knowing when you’re wrong?
Not that simple, right?
There are many psychological theories about intelligence
INTELLIGENT RESEARCH
• Beginning of 20th century – a great interest in the role of genetics and behaviour
• Alfred Binnet – developed first intelligence test in order to improve the French education system
• Is intelligence inherited or is it the result of environmental stimuli?
Central argument is that human intelligence is substantially Influenced by both inherited and environmental factors andis a better predictor of many Personal dynamics, including financial income, job performance, chance ofunwanted pregnancy, and involvement in crime than are an individual's parental socioeconomic status, or education level.
Give me a dozen healthy infants, and my own
specified world to bring them up in and I'll
guarantee to take any one at random and train him
to become any type of specialist I might select –
doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even
beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents,
penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race
of his ancestors.
John B. Watson
INTELLIGENCE – ONGOING DEBATE What is it? How can it be measured? Charles Spearman – theorized that there
is a general intelligence factor, which he called the “g” factor.
Modern intelligence testing attempts to assess this “g”
But the question is: where does “g” come from?
CHARLES SPEARMAN “G” FACTOR
Spearman defined ‘g’ as: “the innate ability to perceive relationships and educe co-relationships”
Don’t test facts and subject knowledge Test spatial ability, reasoning, divergent thinking, and verbal fluency
TEST BIAS?Tests do discriminate.
But some argue that there sole purpose is to discriminate.
We have to look at the type of discrimination.
GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON INTELLIGENCE
No other topic in psychology is so passionately followed as the one that asks
the question, “Is intelligence due to genetics or environment?”
RESEARCH ON INTELLIGENCE Bouchard and McGue (1981) reviewed
111 studies of IQ correlations between siblings
It was META-ANALYSIS (statistical synthesis of the data from a set of comparable studies)
Results: the closer the kinship, the higher the correlation for IQ
MINNESOTA TWIN STUDYBOUCHARD ET AL. 1990
• Aim of the study: researchers seek to identify the genetic and environmental influences on the development of psychological traits.
• Longitudinal study of 11-17 year-old twins, started in 1979. Involved a week-long of medical and psychological assessment of identical and fraternal twins separated in early life.
• This is the most cross-cultural stydy with participants from all over the world.
METHOD & COLLECTING DATA• Medical Assessment:
- Psychiatric interview- Medical life history- Standard blood test- Detailed dental & periodontal exams
• Psychological Assessment:-Academic ability-Personality & Interests-Family & Social relationships-Mental & Physical health-Psychological Measurements
50 hours of testing and
interviews
CONCORDANCE RATES OF INTELIGENCE
Same person tested twice 87%
Identical tins reared together 86%
Identical twins reared apart 76%Fraternal twins reared together 55%
Biological siblings reared together 47%
Researchers determined a heritability estimate of 70% - that is 70% intelligence can be attributed to genetic inheritance
FINDINGS (EXAMPLES)Separated as infants, twins Gerald (Jerry Levey) and Mark Newman grew up to share characteristics ranging from their firefighting avocation to taste in beer.• Neither of them knew of the others existence• When they first met, they saw their reflection in the other
person.• Grew same mustache, wore the same glasses.• Both worked in supermarkets for a while.• Both volunteer fire fighters.• Both men are bachelors and are attracted to the same kind of women.• Both brought up in the Jewish faith but neither is particularly religious.• Both men drink only Budweiser Beer. ( They even hold the can in the
same way• Quote - “we kept making the same remarks at the same time and
using the same gestures. It was spooky...He is he and I am I, and we are one.”
MINNESOTA TWIN STUDY (BOUCHARD ET AL. 1990)• Pros:– Mean age was 41 years old (most twin studies
are about adolescents)– Most cross-cultural study to date
• Cons:– Ethical concerns in reunited twins– Equal environment assumption (just because
twins lived together doesn’t mean they had the same experiences growing up)
– Used media coverage to recruit participants– Frequency of contact between twins prior to
study could not be controlled
THE BOUCHARD STUDY SUFFERS FROM THE EQUAL ENVIRONMENT FALLACY
The Bouchard study suffers from the equal environment fallacy –
a parent preferred one twin over the other,
they were in different classes in school, they have different peer groups based
on extracurricular interests.
BUT…..(AND THAT’S A BIG “BUT”)
“Twin research is flawed, provocative, and fascinating, and it topples some of our most cherished notions…such as our beliefs that parenting styles make an irrevocable difference, that we can mould our children, that we are free agents piecing together our destinies.”
From Roderick Angle’s “Nature’s Clone” in Psychology today, July 1, 1997
MINNESOTA TWIN STUDYAlthough the original longitudinal study is now finished, the Minnesota Center for Twin & Family Research is still conducting studies.See https://mctfr.psych.umn.edu/aboutus/index.html for updates.
ADOPTION STUDY Wahlstein (1997) – well- controlled adoption
studies in France He found that transfering an infant from a
family with low socio – economic status to a home where parents have a high socio – economic status improved childhood IQ
scores by 12-16 points
ADOPTION STUDIES• Scarr and Weinberg (1977) & Horn et al.
(1979)• Studied parents with both biological and
adopted children• So same environment – any differences should
be due to… what?
– Same upbringing and environment, but different biology
– Parents were white and middle class– Children were from lower-class with low-IQ biological
parents• No significant difference in IQ correlations
GENETIC INFLUENCESStudies of twins, family members, and
adopted children together support the idea that there is a significant genetic
contribution to intelligence.
HERITABILITY IN IQ LEVELS
Plomin and Petrill (1997) Correlations between parents and child IQs
change over time It is possible that our genetic disposition
pushes us towards environments that accentuate that disposition, thus leading to increased heritability throughout the lifespan
Socio-economic class is an important environmental factor (i.e. poverty)
HAINER ET AL. (1988)
PET Scan Individuals with high IQ had a lower
metabolic rate when solving a reasoning problem
No change in metabolic rate with a data recall problem
Higher IQs use less energy to think Called the less effort hypothesis
FLYNN EFFECTIn the past 60 years, intelligence scores have risen steadily by an average of 27
points. This phenomenon is known as the Flynn effect.
AVERAGE MEAN SCORES ON STANDARD IQ TESTS GO UP BY ABOUT 3 POINTS EVERY DECADE
Better at cracking the test? Real increase in intelligence? Better nutrition, schooling, childhoods,
technology?
PSYCHOLOGY Evolutionary explanation of
behaviour
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY Is determined on one idea that as genes
mutate, those that are advantageous are passed down through a process of natural selection.
Natural selection cannot select for a behaviour.-can only select mechanisms that produce behaviour
CHARLES DARWIN “FATHER OF THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY” Theory of natural
selection
Animals-evolution Primates- insight into
human behaviour
Mate selection Love of mother Self-preservation
PROFESSOR TETSURO MATSUZAWA 2007
Study challenges the belief of many people, including a number of scientists, that "humans are superior to chimpanzees in all cognitive functions," said researcher Tetsuro Matsuzawa of Kyoto University.Video: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071204-chimps-video-ap.html
One memory test included three five-year-old chimps who were taught the order of Arabic numerals 1 through 9, and a dozen human volunteers.
FESSLER (2006) / DISGUST Study of emotions Dan Fessler (USC) Disgust-enabled ancestors to survive long
enough to produce offspring, who in turn passed the same sensitivities to us.
Nausea experienced by pregnant women (1st trimester)4c xz
FESSLER CONT. Fessler hypothesized that the nausea
response helps to compensate for the suppressed immune system.
Fessler gathered 496 healthy pregnant women(ages 18-50) to rank how disgusting they found 32 disgusting scenarios
• Walking barefoot and stepping on earthworm
• Sticking fish hook through their finger • Maggots on a piece of meant in an
outdoor waste bin
BEFORE EXPERIMENT Fessler asked questions to help determine
whether they were experiencing morning sickness.
First trimester scored the highest
More effective when involving food Food-borne The sensitivity lowers the risk of disease
and infection decreases in consistent with the view of disgust as a form of protection against disease.
CURTIS ET AL. (2004) Patterns in disgust responses Online survey; 20 images Level of disgust? 7 pairs in which one was infectious or
potentially harmful to the immune system vs. non-infectuous
77,000 participants from 165 countries Findings affirmed that most disgusted when
could affect us Supports idea that disgust is a key to
successful reproduction
The original survey can be found at www.bbc.co.uk/sciencehurnanbody/mind/surveys/disgust
THINGS TO CONSIDER…
Difificult to test empirically some evolution-based therefore researchers may be forced to be bias when making affirmations.
Little is known about the behaviour of early Homo sapiens, so statements about humans “used to be” are hypothetical
Evolutionary arguments often underestimate the role of cultural influences in shaping behaviour
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS; GENETIC HERITAGE AND PEOPLE’S LIFE.
One may not like to share about their past
Affected to find out things they didn’t want to know about their ancestors
Confidentiality and privacy
SO GENES ARE THE CAUSE OF OUR BEAHVIOUR?
Not exactly!!
It allows us to trace back our actions and their motives.
Genes can take the blame ;)
CRITICAL THINKING ABOUT BEHAVIOURAL GENETICS Selective placement: adoption agencies try and place children
in families that are similar to their own. Therefore the environment for a twin raised in an adoptive family and a twin raised in the biological family may be very similar. This is the same with adopted children, when compared with their biological and adoptive parents – the environmental factor is difficult to determine. (See p 28-29 of the Psychology e-text)
Twin studies: even if raised apart, identical twins have common age, common sex, similar appearance, similar socioeconomic and cultural environment (usually, see above), and a common prenatal environment.
Increasing heritability: correlations between parent and child IQs change over time, becoming stronger as the child ages. (See Plomin and Petrill, 1997, p 56 in your Course Companion). What could this mean?
In the Course Companion it is stated that “poverty - not genetic inferiority – is key to understanding differences in intelligence” (p56). What could this mean?
WANT TO TEST YOUR OWN IQ? (AND DEVELOP YOUR CRITICAL THINKING).Here are 3 links to online IQ tests. Try and take all 3 tests in the same day. Ignore the results, except to compare them. If they are different, how do you explain this? Have you become more/less intelligent in just one day? If they are the same, is this sufficient to say that you have this “IQ”?http://www.free-iqtest.net/ www.learnmyself.com http://www.iqleague.com (Note that these are all free. The second asks for your email address, but you can make one up).