Jul 15, 2015
Cindy De Smet
• Researcher en lector @hogent
• PhD-student @ugent
• Website: drsmetty.be
• @drsmetty (Twitter)
• Ook op Slideshare, Academia.edu, Google
Scholar, ResearchGate, LinkedIn…
• Contact: [email protected]
3
Deze presentatie is gebaseerd op
mijn doctoraatsonderzoek:
De Smet, C. (2015).
Het gebruik van een learning management system
in het secundair onderwijs:
Ontwerp- en implementatiekenmerken van
leerpaden.
Activiteiten binnen de ELO %
Documenten op een ELO plaatsen 82%
Aankondigingen/berichten
plaatsen 75%
Oefeningen opladen/publiceren 51%
Studenten taken laten indienen 51%
Toetsenmodule (Curios, WinToets) 18%
Chat 9%
Leerpad 27%
Forum 27%
Wiki 25%
De Smet & Schellens (2009)
Teacher
Student
LMS
Learning paths
Subjective
Norm
Perceived
Ease of Use
Behavioral
Intention
Perceived
Usefulness
TAM
CTML
theory
Cognitive
load theory
Collaborative
learning
Use
LMS
acceptance
Design Implementation
E-capacity of
secondary schools
Eclectic theoretical base, as used in De Smet (2015)
11
Technology
acceptance of
LMS
----------------------
Communicational
and informational
use of LMS
Design and
implementation of
Learning Paths in
LMS
Learning Path based
vs conventional
instruction
ICT related
conditions at
the teacher
and school
level
----------------------
Teacher
perceptions.
Overview of the consecutive studies in De Smet (2015)
Perceived Ease of Use (gebruiksgemak)
Perceived Usefulness (bruikbaarheid)
Use
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
1) Beliefs 2) Self-reported use 3) Predicts 40% of a systems’ use
Personal
innovativeness
towards IT
Internal ICT
support
Experience
Perceived
ease of use
Perceived
usefulness
Subjective norm
Informational use
Communicational
use
0.09**
0.28***
0.11*
0.25***
0.31***
0.26***
0.11**
0.35***
0.06***
0.16***
0.39***
0.38*** 46
%
27%
De Smet, Bourgonjon, De Wever, Schellens & Valcke (2012)
Learning path design
• Two versions:
– V1: text, images, schemas, webbased
excercises.
– V2: idem, following Mayer’s Multimedia
guidelines (2003)
• Results: V2 leads to better learning
outcomes (expected)
18
Implementation of learning paths
• Two conditions:
– Students work on an individual base
– Students work collaboratively
• Results: working in an individual setting
leads to better learning outcomes (not
expected)
24-3-2015 De Smet, Schellen, De Wever, Brandt-Pomares & Valcke (2014)
Implementation of learning paths (2)
Removed due to copyright regulations.
Please contact me for an electronic
version of my dissertation.
De Smet, De Wever, Schellens & Valcke (2015)
Removed due to copyright regulations. Please contact me for an electronic version of my dissertation.
Removed due to copyright regulations.
Please contact me for an electronic
version of my dissertation.
24-3-2015 28 De Smet, Valcke, Schellens, De Wever & Vanderlinde (2015)
29 De Smet, Valcke, Schellens, De Wever & Vanderlinde (2015)
Removed due to copyright regulations. Please contact me for an electronic version of my dissertation.
Een wereld vol uitdagingen
• Aantal leerlingen per klas stijgt
• Diversiteit neemt toe
• Beperkt (1/6 lln) en verouderd ICT-park
(1/2 = + 4 jaar oud) - MICTIVO 2012
• Maar er zijn ook tabletscholen
• Verwachtingen vanuit de maatschappij
• …
31