Top Banner
BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.
11

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Jake McGregor
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional

tagging & marking plan

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 2: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Develop a PIT tagging plan, as an element of a more comprehensive regional tagging& marking plan for RME Ensure adequate estimates or indices are

being obtained. Improve efficiency by coordinating tagging

among user groups or H-categories.

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 3: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Mainstem/Hydro: Clarify Management Needs for

mainstem/hydro RME, which require PIT tag based data.

Specify required estimates and quantitative characteristics thereof, e.g. precision.

Assess Population Coverage. Integrate with other H’s PIT tagging needs

and effort.BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 4: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

1. Work through the Mainstem/Hydro Steps and record decisions.

• Inventory planned PIT tag effort for 2010+ • Align the effort with management needs. • Identify gaps

2. Discuss components and structure of a regional PIT tag plan.

3. Discuss who, how and when the plan will be produced (Multi-H effort).

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 5: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

1. RME Workgroups formed (H-specific)

2. Assessed BiOp coverage for RME activities.

3. Catalog projects that currently use PIT, or plan to in the near term

AFEP FWP BioAnalysts,

Inc.

Page 6: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Hydro – Monitor survival both Juvenile and Adults (BiOp) SMP monitoring (FWP) Action effectiveness/ Life history research studies.

Estuary RME Population – VSP

- Status and Trends Hatchery evaluations Habitat action evaluations Harvest impacts

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 7: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Hatchery and habitat projects release tagged lots from specific populations to evaluate actions.

Hydro survival monitoring uses those tagged fish from tribs. and hatcheries.

SMP monitoring also uses those tags. Population status and trend monitoring relies

on those tags as well. Hydro and estuary research projects use

additional tags, some of which can augment hydro performance standard monitoring.

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 8: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Does the AMIP alter Hydro RME needs or shift emphasis relative to tagging needs?

In the future, what populations should tagged, and in what numbers?

How can we efficiently coordinate and integrate tagging efforts among Hatchery Habitat and hydro studies?

BioAnalysts, Inc.

Page 9: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

BioAnalysts, Inc.

hat

hat css vsp

habcss

vsp

hab

Page 10: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

BioAnalysts, Inc.

McNLGR

AFEP Research

NOAA dam tagging

Snake

VSPHABHATCSS

UC &MC-VSP,HAB,HAT,CSS

BON

Page 11: BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

Questionnaire to NOAA, Corps and BPA.

Initial Responses Catalogued projects that will

rely on PIT tag information for AFEP, BiOp and FWP RME. BioAnalysts,

Inc.