BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER: SUPERCRITICAL WATER: EFFECT OF CATALYST EFFECT OF CATALYST Jale Yanik , S.Ebale*, A. Kruse*, M. Saglam, M. Yüksel Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Ege University, 35100 Izmir,Turkey Izmir,Turkey *Institue for Technical Chemistry *Institue for Technical Chemistry Division of Chemical Division of Chemical - - Physical Processing Physical Processing Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe,Germany Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe,Germany
43
Embed
Biomass gasification in supercritical water: II. Effect of catalyst
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN BIOMASS GASIFICATION IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER: SUPERCRITICAL WATER:
EFFECT OF CATALYSTEFFECT OF CATALYST
Jale Yanik, S.Ebale*, A. Kruse*, M. Saglam, M. Yüksel
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100Ege University, 35100
Izmir,TurkeyIzmir,Turkey
*Institue for Technical Chemistry*Institue for Technical ChemistryDivision of ChemicalDivision of Chemical--Physical ProcessingPhysical ProcessingForschungszentrum Karlsruhe,GermanyForschungszentrum Karlsruhe,Germany
Objective of the investigation;
Hydrogen production from biomass by supercritical water gasification
Evulation of experimental findings with respect to:
Product distribution from SCWG of agricultural wastes
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Some parts of aromatic compounds such as lignin or other unsaturated species, are eventually polymerized to tar and char materials.
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Although B6 and B4 have similar lignin content, the amount of coke obtained from B6 was five times more than that of from B4.Similarly, B3 gave two times more coke than that of from B4even their lignin contents were identical.
Coke formation in biomass gasification due to the lignin not only depends on the lignin amount and also strongly depends on the structure of lignin and interactions between other components in biomass.
Product distribution from SCWG of leather wastesThermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
B8 produced more amount of coke, because vegetable tannin agent consists of phenolic compounds.
4,65 4,12 4,13 3,65 2,094,09
1,444,05
02468
101214161820
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Yiel
d, m
ol g
as/k
g bi
omas
s CH4CO2H2
Gas yields from different biomass feedstocks.
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
water–gas shift reaction CO + H2O⇋ CO2 + H2
methanation reaction CO + 3H2⇋ CH4 + H2O
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Although B1 and B4 have similar potassium content as well as the cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin content, the yields and composition of gases obtained from B1 and B4 are significantly different from each other.
These findings indicate that organic materials other thancellulose, hemicellulose and lignin may have also effect theyield and composition of gas products
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Proteins
The degradation of organic acid produce mainly CO, CO2, H2 and H2O
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Amino acids
carbonic acids/amines
carboxylic acids/ammonia
cellulose
glucose/fructose
acids/aldehydes
gases
furfurals
phenols
higher molecular weight products
I II III
decomposition of cellulose in supercritical water
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
g liq
uid
prod
uct /
kg
biom
ass acetic acid
formic acidfurfuralsphenols
Yields of major products in aqueous phase from SCWGof different biomasses.
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
CONCLUSION
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
- The gasification of lignocellulosic and tannery wastesleads to formation of gases consisting of mainly H2,CO2 and CH4.
-The gas obtained from tobacco stalks contained the highest amount H2(39.47%), although it produced relatively lowgas yield.
-The lowest total gas yield was obtained from chromium tanned waste.
CONCLUSION
- tannery waste containing no chromium gave the similargas yields and composition with the lignocellulosic materials.
in the case of real biomass, the gasification reactions were more complex and the whole biomass contents are expected to effect on the results.
Product distribution from SCWG of corncobCatalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
catalysts led to an increase in gas yield where as no significant effect of catalyst on coke formation was observed.
0
5
10
15
20
25
none K2CO3 Trona Red mud Ra-Ni
yiel
ds, m
ol g
as /
kg b
iom
ass
CH4CO2H2
Gas yields from corncob
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Trona showed the highest activity in both
water-gas shift reaction and reforming of methane.
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
0
5
10
15
20
25
none K2CO3 Trona Red mud Ra-Ni
g liq
uid
prod
uct /
kg
biom
ass
acetic acidformic acidfurfuralsphenols
Yields of major products in aqueous phase from SCWGof corncob
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
The effect of catalyst on gasification varied according to the type of agricultural wastes. The differences is resulted from the composition of lignocellulosic materials.
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
-Sunflower stalk contained more amount of cellulose and much less amount of hemicellulose than corncob.
-Besides, the organic constituents other than cellulose and lignin might be different in each material.
CatalystCatalyst nonenone KK22COCO33 TronaTrona Red MudRed Mud
Raney-Ni has very high gasification affect in SCWG of proteins.
Only K2CO3 considerably affected the gas yield.
0
5
10
15
20
25
none K2CO3 Trona Red mud
yiel
ds, m
ol g
as /
kg b
iom
ass
CH4CO2H2
Gas yields from leather
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Proteins
The degradation of organic acid produce mainly CO, CO2, H2 and H2O
Thermal Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
Amino acids
carbonic acids/amines
carboxylic acids/ammonia
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
none K2CO3 Trona Red mud
g liq
uid
prod
uct /
kg
biom
ass
acetic acidformic acidfurfuralsphenols
Yields of major products in aqueous phase from SCWE of leather waste
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
• The amount of acetic acid decreased in presence of catalysts.
• Because the tanning agent in leather waste consists ofphenolic compounds, the phenols content in aqueous phase was increased by catalytic degradation of tanningagent.
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
In this study, the catalytic gasification of real biomasses (lignocellulosic and proteinous materials) in supercritical water was investigated.
Trona (a natural mineral) and red-mud (a by-product) were used as catalyst besides K2CO3 and Raney-Ni,
CONCLUSION
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
The effect of catalysts on gasification varied according to the type of biomass.
Catalysts have significantly increased the hydrogen yield. The all used catalysts enhanced the water-gas shift reaction and reforming of methane which due to the formation of H2 rather than methanation.
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
CONCLUSION
Trona showed similar gasification activity with K2CO3.
Although, the yield of hydrogen with red mud was lower than that with alkaline catalysts for all biomass tested, the present findings established that iron based catalysts show activity for the production of hydrogen from biomass.
Catalytic Gasification
Gasification of Biomass in SCW
CONCLUSION
As conclusion, SCWG of biomass in presence of red mud and trona is a promising method to produce H2 from biomass efficiently as well as gasification with commercial alkaline catalysts.