Biomass Dynamics of Biomass Dynamics of Amazonian Forest Amazonian Forest Fragments Fragments William F. Laurance William F. Laurance & Henrique Nascimento & Henrique Nascimento Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Manaus, Brazil Manaus, Brazil
19
Embed
Biomass Dynamics of Amazonian Forest Fragments William F. Laurance & Henrique Nascimento Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama Biological Dynamics.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Biomass Dynamics of Biomass Dynamics of Amazonian Forest Amazonian Forest
FragmentsFragments
William F. Laurance William F. Laurance
& Henrique Nascimento& Henrique Nascimento
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PanamaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Manaus, BrazilManaus, Brazil
Deforestation in Brazilian AmazoniaDeforestation in Brazilian Amazonia
Increased Increased significantly significantly during the last during the last decadedecade-1990-1994: 1.31 -1990-1994: 1.31 million ha/yearmillion ha/year
-1995-2002: 1.92 -1995-2002: 1.92 million ha/yearmillion ha/year
Rapid Forest FragmentationRapid Forest Fragmentation Every kmEvery km22 of of
each landscape each landscape has 1.3-1.8 km has 1.3-1.8 km of forest edgeof forest edge
Nearly 20,000 Nearly 20,000 km of new edge km of new edge created in created in Brazilian Brazilian Amazon Amazon annually*annually*
* W. Chomentowski, D. Skole, * W. Chomentowski, D. Skole, M. Cochrane, Michigan State M. Cochrane, Michigan State UniversityUniversity
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments ProjectProject
Study AreaStudy Area
Edge-related Changes in Edge-related Changes in Forest Dynamics, Structure, Forest Dynamics, Structure, and Compositionand Composition
Elevated Tree MortalityElevated Tree Mortality
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
100 1000
Y = 3.64 - 0.75 log XR=0.51, P=0.0002
Mor
talit
y (%
/yea
r)
Distance to edge (m)
Laurance et al. (1998) Ecology
Loss of Large-tree BiomassLoss of Large-tree Biomass
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
100 1000
Y = -52.9 + 18.8 log XR=0.44, P=0.001B
iom
ass
chan
ge (M
g/ha
)
Distance to edge (m)
Laurance et al. (1997) Science
Laurance et al. (2000) Nature
GoalsGoals• To assess impacts of fragmentation on To assess impacts of fragmentation on
all components of aboveground all components of aboveground biomassbiomass• Large (Large (>>10 cm dbh) trees10 cm dbh) trees• Understory biomass Understory biomass • NecromassNecromass
• To estimate effects on forest C storage To estimate effects on forest C storage and atmospheric emissionsand atmospheric emissions
Assume no changes in belowground biomassAssume no changes in belowground biomass Net biomass decline = biomass lost from large trees Net biomass decline = biomass lost from large trees
(22.7 Mg/ha) – increases in understory biomass (1.7 (22.7 Mg/ha) – increases in understory biomass (1.7 Mg/ha) and necromass (10.1 Mg/ha) = 10.9 Mg/haMg/ha) and necromass (10.1 Mg/ha) = 10.9 Mg/ha
Half of biomass is carbon, most is respired quicklyHalf of biomass is carbon, most is respired quickly Thus, committed emissions are 4-6 Mg/haThus, committed emissions are 4-6 Mg/ha Because tree mortality is elevated within 300 m of Because tree mortality is elevated within 300 m of
edges, we expect 12-18 Mg C for every 100 m of edges, we expect 12-18 Mg C for every 100 m of forest edge createdforest edge created
Based simply on current rate of edge creation, annual Based simply on current rate of edge creation, annual emissions would be 2.3-3.5 million Mg/yearemissions would be 2.3-3.5 million Mg/year
Fragmentation and FireFragmentation and Fire Increased wood debris & litterIncreased wood debris & litter Recurring canopy damageRecurring canopy damage Higher insolation, wind & Higher insolation, wind &
changes in the distribution of changes in the distribution of aboveground biomassaboveground biomass– Decline of large-tree biomassDecline of large-tree biomass– More wood debris, litter, small More wood debris, litter, small
treestrees
C cycling accelerates sharplyC cycling accelerates sharply Substantial C emissionsSubstantial C emissions Drastic increase in fire Drastic increase in fire