1/23/2013 1 Biomass Characterization and Gasification January 24, 2013 CHEN 4470: Process Design Practice Sushil Adhikari, Ph.D. Biosystems Engineering Department Biomass Properties • Physical Properties – Density, size, shape, area • Chemical Properties – Heating value, proximate analysis, ultimate analysis • Biomass Constituents – Hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin
23
Embed
Biomass Characterization and Gasificationwp.auburn.edu/eden/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/4470-Lecture-5-2013… · Biomass Characterization and Gasification January 24, ... gasifier.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1/23/2013
1
Biomass Characterization and Gasification
January 24, 2013
CHEN 4470: Process Design Practice
Sushil Adhikari, Ph.D.Biosystems Engineering Department
Biomass Properties
• Physical Properties – Density, size, shape, area
• Chemical Properties – Heating value, proximate analysis, ultimate
analysis
• Biomass Constituents – Hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin
• Carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen areconverted into carbon dioxide, water vapor,nitrogen, respectively for quantification.
• Usually, oxygen is calculated from thedifference (100-C-H-N).
Ultimate Analysis (contd.)
1/23/2013
3
Heating Value
• Heating value represents the heat releasedwhen the chemical compound isstoichiometrically combusted.
• Heating value is expressed in terms of higher(gross) heating value (HHV) or lower (net)heating value (LHV).
• While measuring HHV, the products ofcombustion are cooled to the initialtemperature of the compound. In LHV, thewater produced during combustion is notcondensed.
Table: Proximate, ultimate and heating value analyses (dry weight basis) of selected biomass feedstocks
Switchgrass Hybrid
poplar
Pine
woodchipsbSugar cane
bagasse
Wyoming Elkol
coal
Proximate Analysis
Fixed Carbon
Volatile Matter
Ash
14.34
76.69
8.97
12.49
84.81
2.70
18.01
81.71
0.28
11.95
85.61
2.44
51.4
44.4
4.2
Ultimate Analysis
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Oxygen‡
Sulfur
Chlorine
46.68
5.82
0.77
37.38
0.19
0.19
50.18
6.06
0.60
40.43
0.02
0.01
49.33
5.03
0.53
44.70
0.13
0.003
48.64
5.87
0.16
42.82
0.04
0.03
71.5
5.3
1.2
16.9
0.9
n/a
HHV, MJ/kg 18.06 19.02 19.40 18.99 29.50
‡calculated from difference. n/a= not available.
1/23/2013
4
Enthalpies of Formation
• Enthalpies of formation is quite useful forthermodynamic calculations such as Gibbsfree energy of minimization.
• The standard enthalpy of formation of aparticular biomass sample is equal to thesum of heats of formation of the products oncombustion minus the HHV. If you use the minus sign, then you
should use “-” for the HHV because of exothermicity. Otherwise, you can use “plus” sign withoutworrying any sign for the HHV.
• It is assumed that ash is inert.
• Standard enthalpies of formation at 298 K ofthe combustion products are as follows:
CO2 = -94.05; H2O =-68.37; NO2 =8.09; SO2
=70.95 in kcal/g-mol
Gasification:Biomass:
CH1.44O0.66
High Temperature(800-900oC)
Insufficient Oxidizing agent
(Air, O2, H2O and CO2)
Products:
H2
CO2
Syngas:
CO
CH4
Small solid or liquid fractions
Biomass Gasification
1/23/2013
5
Biomass Gasification
• Partial oxidation of biomass to produce a lowcalorific-value fuel called syngas or producer gas.
• Main components of the producer gas are CO, H2,CO2, CH4, N2, and H2O.
• Chemical transformation can take place in fixed,moving, or fluidized bed or entrained flow gasifiersat temperatures of 1400 to 1800°F with pressuresfrom 1 to 30 atmospheres.
Syngas Potential
Source: Jenny B. Tennant. NETL Overview of DOE’s Gasification Program
Biomax control system 64 control points (temps, pressures,
flows, motors, engine, generator, etc.) 30 auto alarms with text messaging or
email. Auto remote start up and shut down. Full data logging – downloadable. Remote trouble diagnosis / software
upgrades. Manual on-site push button start-stop.
Fluidization Regimes
Source: Introduction to Fluidization Technology by Dr. Karl V. Jacob and Dr. Ray Cocco on April 13, 2011 at ChemE on Demand
1/23/2013
14
Types of Gasifier (cont.)
Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier
Entrained Flow Gasifier
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
Fig. Auburn University’s bubbling fluidized bed gasifier and biomass feeder
Fig. Gas conditioning system
1/23/2013
15
Advantages/ Disadvantages
• Updraft Gasifier– Size, shape and moisture content of biomass
particles are less critical than with a downdraftgasifier.
– Design is simple and results in a fairly highheating value of the gas.
– The quality of the syngas is generally quite low.
– High temperature near the reactor grate cancause blocking due to ash fusion
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
• Downdraft Gasifier– Produced gas is generally of relatively good
quality and has low level of tars.
– Up to 99.9% of the formed tar is consumedminimizing tar cleanup.
– Syngas contains relatively high levels of CO2
since a large portion of the biomass isoxidised.
– Heating value is low.
– Size and shape and low moisture content ofbiomass particles must be controlled withinclose limits.
Advantages… (cont.)
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
1/23/2013
16
Advantages/ Disadvantages (cont.)
• Crossdraft Gasifier
– Design is simple.
– Quality of syngas is generally poor.
– Heating value of the syngas is low and the tarcontent is high.
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
Advantages/ Disadvantages (cont.)
• Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier– Reactor allows high rates of throughput, higher
than fixed beds.– Results in good mixing, optimized kinetics,
particle/gas contact and heat transfer as well aslong residence time.
– High carbon conversion rates and, consequently,high yields.
– Sand bed makes it possible to use in-bed catalyticprocessing.
– Syngas is rich in particulates
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
1/23/2013
17
Advantages/ Disadvantages (cont.)
• Entrained Flow Gasifier– Almost tar free syngas
– Leach-resistant molten slag
– A high percentage of energy is converted intosensible heat.
– Production of biomass powder is an extracost.
Source: Olofsson et al., 2005.
Composition of Gas Yield
• Fuel Composition
• Gasifying Medium
• Operating Pressure
• Temperature
• Moisture Content of the Fuel
• Mode of Bringing the Reactants into Contact
Source: Prabir Basu, 2006. Combustion and Gasification in Fluidized Beds
1/23/2013
18
Gas Composition (cont.)
Component Composition, %
Nitrogen 50-54
CO 17-22
CO2 9-15
H2 12-20
CH4 2-3
Heating Value, kJ/m3
5000-5900
Source: Wood gas as engine fuel. FAO 1986. pp.19
Gas composition presentedhere is from downdraftgasifier operated at 20% MC.
Effect of Operating Parameters
• Temperature
• Pressure
• Feed Characteristics– Fuel Reactivity
– Volatile Matters
– Ash
– Moisture Content
Source: Prabir Basu, 2006. Combustion and Gasification in Fluidized Beds
1/23/2013
19
Volatile Matter
• Fuels with high volatile matter content areeasier to gasify.
• Also, char produced from gasificationprocess is more porous and easier togasify.
• Biomass has high volatile matters andproduces high tar content.
• High tar content makes gas clean-upprocess difficult.
Source: Prabir Basu, 2006. Combustion and Gasification in Fluidized Beds
Ash Content• Ash content does not have direct influence on
the gas composition.
• However, it affects the practical operation ofgasifier.
• Ash can be removed either in solid or liquidform.
• In fixed and fluidizing beds, ash is removed insolid form.
• If the ash is removed in the solid form,feedstocks should have high ash-melting/softening temperatures and the gasifiershould be operated at well below meltingtemperature.
1/23/2013
20
Ash Content (cont.)
• The relationship between ash meltingtemperature and composition is a complicated.
• It mainly depends on SiO2-Al2O3-Cao-FeO.
• High in silica and alumina will result high inash-melting temperature. But, the ratio ofsilica/alumina is also equally important.
• It is reduced by the presence of CaO and FeO.
• Ash-melting temperature of coal is more than1200 oC but biomass can have significantly lowerthan 950 oC.
Ash Content (cont.)
1/23/2013
21
Constituents Fraction
(N2 balance) Higher Heating Value
Syngas Composition from Different Feedstocks
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
O2 CO CO2 CH4 H2
%v
ol.
Peanut hullsSaw dustPoultry LitterWood chips
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Peanuthulls
Saw dust PoultryLitter
Woodchips
MJ
/m3
Gautam et al. (2009), ASABE Annual International Meeting. June 21-June 24, 2009, Reno, NV
Gasification Processes and Methanol Production
Process Condition Gasifier Type
Circulating fluidized bed
Bubbling fluidized bed
Entrained
Feedstock (wood), t/d 1650 1650 1650
Steam, t/t dry feed 0.31 0.3 0.03
Oxygen, t/t dry feed 0 0.3 0.5
Air, t/t dry feed 1.46 0 0
Gas. Temp., oC 927 982 1045
Gas. Press., psi 14.8 507 357
Exit gas (dry)
H2 (vol.%) 21.1 30.7 33.9
CO (vol.%) 46.8 22.2 50.7
CH4 (vol.%) 14.9 12.0 0.2
CO2 (vol.%) 11.3 35.2 14.9
H2/CO 0.45 1.38 0.66
Source: Klass (1998).
1/23/2013
22
Design Consideration
• Gasifier Efficiency– Cold gas efficiency – Hot gas efficiency
• Carbon Conversion• Equivalence Ratio
Cold gas efficiency = (Heating value of productgas/Heating value of feedstocks)x100 %
It is important to specify whether the heating values are onhigher heating value or lower heating value basis.
Design Consideration (contd.)
The gas is not cooled before combustion and thesensible heat is also useful. Therefore, sometimes,hot gas efficiency is also used for such applications.
Hot gas efficiency = (Heating value ofproduct gas + Hsensible /Heating valueof feedstocks) x 100 %
1/23/2013
23
Design Consideration (contd.)
Carbon conversion = {1 –Carbon in gasificationresidue/Carbon in feedstocks} x 100 %
or{Carbon in gas composition/Carbon in
feedstocks} x 100 %
• Care is required to interpret the data. Highermethane concentration could result in highercold efficiency and good for powerapplication but it is not the optimum choicefor a synthesis gas applications to producefuels and chemicals.
Design Consideration (contd.)
• Equivalence Ratio (ER):
= (A/F)actual/(A/F)stoichiometric
• The quality of syngas depends upon the value ofER.
• A low value of ER (<0.2) results in severalproblems including excessive char formation.• A high value of ER (>0.4) results in excessiveformation of CO2 and H2O.• Typical range of ER is ~0.2 -0.4.