Top Banner
Biofidelity Analysis of WorldSID and ES-2re Biofidelity Analysis of WorldSID and ES-2re Hyundai Meeting February 9, 2009 Jim Stricklin Transportation Research Center Inc. Dan Rhule National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Research and Test Center
38

Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

Dec 03, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

Biofidelity Analysis ofWorldSID and ES-2reBiofidelity Analysis ofWorldSID and ES-2re

Hyundai MeetingFebruary 9, 2009

Jim StricklinTransportation Research Center Inc.

Dan RhuleNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Vehicle Research and Test Center

Page 2: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

2 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Background

Industry petitioned the Agency to include the WorldSID 50th in Part 572 and FMVSS 214

the ISO biofidelity ranking system (ISO 9790) indicates that the WorldSID biofidelity is superior to ES-2reglobal harmonization

Page 3: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

3 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Background (cont.)

A collaborative project evaluating an improved WorldSID has been completed

NHTSA worked closely with the WorldSID Task Group using 2 dummies provided by OSRPseveral improvements were made to the dummy during the evaluation

Page 4: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

4 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Objectives

Present the results of the WorldSID and ES-2re biofidelity rankings using an updated version of the NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System (H. Rhule, 2002 Stapp)

Share our observations relating to dummy design and performance

Page 5: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

5 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Preview

Review of Biofidelity Ranking System

Summary of results

Results of specific body regions

Conclusions

Page 6: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

6 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Biofidelity Ranking System

ExternalBiofidelity

InternalBiofidelity

Biofidelity Ranking System

Page 7: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

7 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

External Biofidelity (EB)Ability to replicate human loading of its environment in a crash

Measurements made externally to human and dummy

Vo

F(t)

F(t)

F(t)

Page 8: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

8 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Internal Biofidelity (IB)Ability to replicate human internal response in a crash

Internal measurements used for injury criteria

Voa(t)

a(t)x(t)

a(t)

Page 9: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

9 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Ranked Body RegionsRanked Body Regions

HEAD

NECK

SHOULDER

THORAX

ABDOMEN

PELVIS

ES-2re WorldSID

Page 10: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

10 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

DCV / CCV* (R)DCV / CCV* (R)Fo

rce,

Acc

eler

atio

n, o

r Def

lect

ion

Time

CadaverResponse

Corridor(± STDEV)

CadaverMean

ti

ΔCt

DummyResponse

ΔDt

DCV ∑=

n

t 0(ΔDt)2=

CCV (ΔCt)2∑=

n

t 0= RR==

* Morgan et al. 1986* Morgan et al. 1986

Page 11: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

11 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Bioranking (B) Calculation

Average results fromTest Conditions

1 to n= IBThorax

Test Condition 1Avg. √R for all internal

thorax responsemeasurements

IBHead

IBShoulder

IBThorax

IBAbdomen

IBPelvis

Test Condition 2Avg. √R for all internal

thorax responsemeasurements

...Test Condition n

Avg. √R for all internalthorax responsemeasurements

Avg. of = Internal Biofidelity

Thorax Internal Biofidelity

Page 12: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

12 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Bio Rank Test Matrix & References

ISO 9790 - Pelvis Test 2Pelvis Test 210 m/s Rigid Pendulum Pelvis ImpactISO 9790 - Pelvis Test 1Pelvis Test 16 m/s Rigid Pendulum Pelvis Impact

ISO 9790 - Abdomen Test 3 & Pelvis Test 10

Wayne State Sled Test6.8 m/s Rigid Wall Sled

ISO 9790 - Thorax Test 5 & Pelvis Test 7

Heidelberg Sled Test6.8 m/s Rigid Wall Sled

ISO 9790 - Thorax Test 1Thorax Test 14.3 m/s Rigid Pendulum Lateral Thorax Impact

ISO 9790 - Neck Test 3 & Shoulder Test 3Neck Test 312.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

ISO 9790 - Neck Test 1 & Shoulder Test 2Neck Test 17.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

ISO 9790 - Head Test 1Head Test 1200 mm Rigid Lateral Head DropReferenceTest NameTest Condition

Page 13: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

13 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Bio Rank Test Matrix & References (cont.)

Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA HS FP8.9 m/s Flat Padded Wall Sled

Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS RPO6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS RAO6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS FP6.7 m/s Flat Padded Wall SledMaltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS FR6.7 m/s Flat Rigid Wall Sled

Shaw et al. 2006NHTSA Thorax Test

2.5 m/s Rigid Pendulum Lateral and Oblique Thorax Impact

Bolte et al. 2003NHTSA Shoulder Test

4.4 m/s Padded Pendulum Lateral and Oblique Shoulder Impact

ReferenceTest NameTest Condition

≈ 90 Impactor Tests

≈ 40 Sled Tests w/ 2 occupant

sled buck

Page 14: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

14 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Neck Shoulder Thorax Abdomen Pelvis Overall

√R

WorldSIDES-2re

External Biofidelity

Better Biofidelity

Ext

erna

l Bio

rank

(EB

)

1.9

3.23.5

2.7

Page 15: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

15 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Head Should er Th orax Ab domen Pelvis * O verall

√R

W orld S IDES-2re

* W /O Abdom en

Internal Biofidelity

Better Biofidelity

* w/o Abdomen

Inte

rnal

Bio

rank

(IB)

1.6 1.7

Page 16: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

16 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Head

ES-2re WorldSID

Page 17: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

17 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Head Response Summary

1.020.33Peak ResultantHead Acceleration

ISO 9790 Head Test 1 - 200 mmRigid Lateral Head Drop

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Head Internal Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Head

W orldSIDES-2re

.3

1.0

Page 18: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

18 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Neck

ES-2re WorldSID

Page 19: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

19 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

*The data for this test is from Byrnes et al., 2002 Stapp Conference

Neck Response Summary

2.851.15Peak Flexion Angle (º)

1.590.25Peak Horizontal Displacementof Head cg Relative to Sled (mm)ISO 9790 Neck Test 3

12.2 g Sled Test

1.000.40Peak Flexion Angle (º)

2.49*1.22Peak Vertical Displacementof Head cg Relative to T1 (mm)

3.251.22Peak Horizontal Displacementof Head cg Relative to T1 (mm)

ISO 9790 Neck Test 17.2 g Sled Test

ES-2WorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Neck External Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Neck

W orldSIDES-2re

.8

2.5

Page 20: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

20 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Shoulder

ES-2re WorldSID

Page 21: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

21 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Shoulder

ES-2re

Page 22: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

22 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Shoulder

WorldSID

Page 23: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

23 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Shoulder Response Summary

1.831.59Pendulum X-axis Force (kN)

3.440.54Pendulum Y-axis Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s30º Pendulum Impact

1.960.84Pendulum X-axis Force (kN)

2.961.26Pendulum Y-axis Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s15º Pendulum Impact

1.100.87Pendulum Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/sLateral Pendulum Impact

1.470.24Peak Horizontal Displacementof T1 Relative to Sled (mm)

ISO 9790 Shoulder Test 27.2 g Sled Test

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Shoulder External Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Shou lder

W orldSIDES-2re

.8

1.9

Page 24: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

24 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Shoulder Response Summary

2.843.61Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)

NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s30º Pendulum Impact

1.721.70Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)

NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s15º Pendulum Impact

1.111.55Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)

NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/sLateral Pendulum Impact

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Shoulder Internal Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Shou lder

W orldSIDES-2re

2.3

1.9

Page 25: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

25 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

ThoraxES-2re WorldSID

Page 26: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

26 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

ThoraxES-2re Rib Module

back

front

Linear Guide

Page 27: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

27 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 20092.832.57Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

2.935.59Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

4.223.81Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

2.504.21Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

3.103.24Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

1.421.25Thorax Plate ForceISO 9790 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

4.923.39Pendulum ForceNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s 30º Pendulum Impact

1.701.97Pendulum ForceNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

2.291.27Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Thorax Test 1 4.3 m/s Pendulum Impact

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Thorax External Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Thorax

W orldSIDES-2re

3.02.9

Page 28: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

28 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Thorax Response Summary

2.950.70Peak lateral acceleration of the impacted rib

4.224.01Peak Lateral Acceleration of Lower Spine

6.866.03Peak Lateral Acceleration of Upper Spine

ISO 9790 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

2.952.80Thorax DisplacementNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s 30ºPendulum Impact

1.131.43Thorax DisplacementNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

2.641.66Upper Spine Lateral Acceleration

ISO 9790 Thorax Test 14.3 m/s Pendulum Impact

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Thorax Internal Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Thorax

W orldSIDES-2re

2.02.4

Page 29: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

29 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

AbdomenES-2re WorldSID

Page 30: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

30 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

AbdomenES-2re Rib Abdomen

Page 31: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

31 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Abdomen Response Summary

3.242.83Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

3.953.71Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

5.280.94Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

1.051.61Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

0.580.60Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

2.081.72Abdomen Plate ForceISO 9790 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Abdomen External Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Abdom en

W orldSIDES-2re

1.9

2.7

Page 32: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

32 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Abdomen Response Summary

NA2.89Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

NA2.79Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

NA1.78Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

NA1.64Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

NA2.75Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Abdomen Internal Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Abdom en

W orldSIDES-2re

2.4

Page 33: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

33 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

PelvisES-2re

WorldSID

Page 34: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

34 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Pelvis Response Summary

4.823.77Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

1.491.60Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

2.144.06Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

2.132.13Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

2.441.77Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

1.631.61Pelvis Plate ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 10 - 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

7.896.76Peak Pelvis Plate ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 7 - 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

15.293.50Peak Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 2 - 10 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

5.390.23Peak Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 1 - 6 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Pelvis External Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Pelvis

W orldSIDES-2re

2.8

4.8

Page 35: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

35 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Pelvis Response Summary

1.091.26Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

2.621.94Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

1.091.16Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

1.692.09Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

1.721.53Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

1.003.98Peak Pelvis Lateral AccelerationISO 9790 Pelvis Test 10 - 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

1.500.35Peak Pelvis Lateral AccelerationISO 9790 Pelvis Test 7 - 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

ES-2reWorldSID

Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

Pelvis Internal Response Summary

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Pelvis

W orldSIDES-2re

1.81.5

Page 36: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

36 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Conclusions

WSID overall internal and external biofidelityis better than ES-2re

WSID shoulder has improved ROM, measures displacement

WSID shoulder & thorax have more realistic motion and improved external oblique biofidelic response

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

O verall

W orldSIDES-2re

1.9

3.2

External Biofidelity

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

O verall

W orldSIDES-2re

1.6 1.7

Internal Biofidelity

Page 37: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

37 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Conclusions (cont.)

WSID Durability, R&R and Usability are acceptable

The WorldSID 50th male dummy is an improved side impact test dummy

WSID abdomen measures displacement

Page 38: Biofidelity WorldSID and ES-2re hyundai

38 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

Thank You