Top Banner
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems
61
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

BIOE 109Summer 2009

Lecture 10- part IMating systems

Page 2: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Types of Mating Systems

Mating Systems Mode Parental care

Monogamy One male and one female form bond

both

Polygyny Male mates with multiple females

female

Polyandry Female mates with multiple males

male

Promiscuity Both sexes mate with multiple partners

Both, either, or neither

Page 3: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Mating Systems In Nature

Page 4: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Polygyny Polygyny

MonogamyMonogamy

Polyandry

Monogamy

Mating Systems In Nature

Page 5: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

?

Mating Systems In Nature

Page 6: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Promiscuous

Mating Systems In Nature

Page 8: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Hypothesis for the evolution of mating systems

• Based on parental care and ecological constraints

Page 9: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Hypothesis for the evolution of mating systems

• Based on parental care and ecological constraints

Who can ditch first?

Page 10: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Hypothesis for the evolution of mating systems

• Based on parental care and ecological constraints

Who can ditch first?

Is ditching worth it?

Page 11: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex allocation

Page 12: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex allocation• the allocation of resources to male versus

female production in sexual species (Charnov 1982).

• Sex Ratio?

Page 13: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

What is sex ratio?  

• sex ratio is defined as the proportion of males to females. 

Page 14: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

What is sex ratio?  

• sex ratio is defined as the proportion of males to females. 

• two distinct sex ratios exist: 

Page 15: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

What is sex ratio?  

• sex ratio is defined as the proportion of males to females. 

• two distinct sex ratios exist: 

1. the population sex ratio

i.e., the proportion of males to females in the population

Page 16: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

What is sex ratio?  

• sex ratio is defined as the proportion of males to females. 

• two distinct sex ratios exist: 

1. the population sex ratio

i.e., the proportion of males to females in the population

2. the individual sex ratio

Page 17: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

What is sex ratio? 

 

• sex ratio is defined as the proportion of males to females. 

• two distinct sex ratios exist: 

1. the population sex ratio

i.e., the proportion of males to females in the population

2. the individual sex ratio

i.e., the sex ratio of progeny from a female 

Page 18: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

-In many species sex chromosomes cause 1:1 sex ratio

The evolution of sex ratio

Page 19: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Mammals: females are homogametic (XX)

males are heterogametic (XY)  Birds: males are homogametic (ZZ)

females are heterogametic (WZ) 

The evolution of sex ratio

Page 20: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Mammals: females are homogametic (XX)

males are heterogametic (XY)  Birds: males are homogametic (ZZ)

females are heterogametic (WZ)  Sex chromosomes do not guarantee a 1:1 sex ratio!

Page 21: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why equal numbers of males and females?

 

• R.A. Fisher (1930) provided a genetic explanation for the evolution of a stable sex ratio of 1:1. 

Page 22: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why equal numbers of males and females?

 

• R.A. Fisher (1930) provided a genetic explanation for the evolution of a stable sex ratio of 1:1. 

• since every individual has one mother and one father, each sex contributes equally, on average, to subsequent generations.

Page 23: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why equal numbers of males and females?

 

• R.A. Fisher (1930) provided a genetic explanation for the evolution of a stable sex ratio of 1:1. 

• since every individual has one mother and one father, each sex contributes equally, on average, to subsequent generations. 

• therefore, males and females must have the same average fitness.

Page 24: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Suppose:25% male males will have high fitness75% female because they mate with

multiple females

Suppose:

75% male females will have high fitness 25% female because they mate with multiple

males

• Members of the rarer sex will experience increased reproductive success relative to common sex

• frequency-dependent selection results in stable equilibrium sex ratio of 1:1.

 

Page 25: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

 

NOT ALWAYS 1:1

Page 26: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

1. Local mate competition (Hamilton 1967)

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973)

Page 27: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

1. Local mate competition (Hamilton 1967) 

• proposed to account for female-biased sex ratios (e.g., parasitoid wasps).

Page 28: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

1. Local mate competition (Hamilton 1967) 

• proposed to account for female-biased sex ratios (e.g. parasitoid wasps).

• here, a single foundress produces a small group of closely related individuals that mate among themselves. 

Page 29: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

1. Local mate competition (Hamilton 1967) 

• proposed to account for female-biased sex ratios (e.g. parasitoid wasps).

• here, a single foundress produces a small group of closely related individuals that mate among themselves.  

• females invest heavily in daughters and don’t “waste” effort in producing sons.

Page 30: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory 

1. Local mate competition (Hamilton 1967) 

Male

Females

Mother

Dust mites (Acarophenox)

1 son to 20 daughters

Page 31: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

Red deer, Cervus elaphus

Page 32: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

• occurs in polygynous species when females invest heavily in producing and caring for their young.

Page 33: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

• occurs in polygynous species when females invest heavily in producing and caring for their young.

 • a good mother can produce larger, or healthier, individuals when they mature.

Page 34: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

• occurs in polygynous species when females invest heavily in producing and caring for their young.

 • a good mother can produce larger, or healthier, individuals when they mature. 

• theory predicts that females in extremely good condition should produce males. 

Page 35: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

• occurs in polygynous species when females invest heavily in producing and caring for their young.

 • a good mother can produce larger, or healthier, individuals when they mature. 

• theory predicts that females in extremely good condition should produce males. 

• Why?

Page 36: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Exceptions to Fisher’s theory

2. Condition-dependent sex allocation (Trivers and Willard 1973) 

• occurs in polygynous species when females invest heavily in producing and caring for their young.

 • a good mother can produce larger, or healthier, individuals when they mature. 

• theory predicts that females in extremely good condition should produce males. 

• Why? Because sexual selection (usually) occurs more strongly in males and condition matters!

Page 37: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

How is sex ratio adjusted by mother?

• Not known

Page 38: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex Allocation Recap

• Sex ratio• Why we see an unbiased sex ratio

– Sex chromosomes– Frequency dependent selection

• Exceptions to sex ratio:– Local mate competition– Condition-dependent sex allocation

Page 39: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex in Plants 

 

Page 40: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex in Plants 

 

♂♀

Page 41: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Sex in Plants

• Why and how do they outbreed?

• Why do they inbreed?

Page 42: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

• many plant species have evolved traits to avoid inbreeding. 

Page 43: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

• many plant species have evolved traits to avoid inbreeding. 1. Asynchronous male and female functions

• pollen shed after or before plant’s stigmas are receptive. 

Page 44: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

• many plant species have evolved traits to avoid inbreeding. 1. Asynchronous male and female functions

• pollen shed after or before plant’s stigmas are receptive. 

Page 45: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

• many plant species have evolved traits to avoid inbreeding. 1. Asynchronous male and female functions

• pollen shed after or before plant’s stigmas are receptive. 2. Monoecy

• male and female flowers separated on same plant. 

Page 46: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

 2. Monoecy• male and female flowers separated on same plant. 

Page 47: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

• many plant species have evolved traits to avoid inbreeding. 1. Asynchronous male and female functions

• pollen shed after or before plant’s stigmas are receptive. 

2. Monoecious

• male and female flowers separated on same plant. 3. Dieocy

• sexes are separated in different individuals. 

Page 48: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

3. Dieocy

• sexes are separated in different individuals. 

Page 49: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

4. Self-incompatibility loci

• prevent selfing or breeding with close relatives. 

Page 50: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

4. Self-incompatibility loci

• prevent selfing or breeding with close relatives. 5. Heterostyly

• two (distyly) or three (tristyly) forms of flowers exist in a species (on different plants).

Page 51: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

4. Self-incompatibility loci

• prevent selfing or breeding with close relatives. 5. Heterostyly

• two (distyly) or three (tristyly) forms of flowers exist in a species (on different plants).

• pollen is more effectively transferred between, rather than within, morphs.

Page 52: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

The evolution of inbreeding and outbreeding

 

4. Self-incompatibility loci

• prevent selfing or breeding with close relatives. 5. Heterostyly

• two (distyly) or three (tristyly) forms of flowers exist in a species (on different plants).

• pollen is more effectively transferred between, rather than within, morphs.

• acts to maximize outcrossing.

Page 53: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Thrum flowered Primula polyneura Pin flowered Primula polyneura

Heterostyly in Primula polynera

Page 54: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

Page 55: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 

Page 56: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 1. through its ovules

Page 57: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 1. through its ovules2. through its pollen by selfing

Page 58: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 1. through its ovules2. through its pollen by selfing3. through its pollen by outcrossing. 

Page 59: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 1. through its ovules2. through its pollen by selfing3. through its pollen by outcrossing.  

• another advantage of selfing is reproductive assurance

Page 60: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

Why inbreed? 

• partial selfers have a fitness advantage over exclusive outcrossers because genes can be transmitted: 1. through its ovules2. through its pollen by selfing3. through its pollen by outcrossing.  

• another advantage of selfing is reproductive assurance

• if pollinators are scarce, then a plant can produce at least some seeds by selfing.

Page 61: BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 10- part I Mating systems.

OVERALL

• Mating Systems

• Sex allocation

• Sex ratios

• Exceptions to 1:1 sex ratio

• Mating in plants