Top Banner
Bioassay of Two Ponds Katie Kraska Stephen Hesterberg Matt Brown
12

Bioassay of Two Ponds

Jan 09, 2016

Download

Documents

Bioassay of Two Ponds. Katie Kraska Stephen Hesterberg  Matt Brown . Motivations for Research. Dramatic shifts in free nutrient levels  Eutrophication Effects specific to our area Research often done on the Quarry Pond. Goals and Hypotheses. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Bioassay of Two Ponds

Katie KraskaStephen Hesterberg 

Matt Brown 

Page 2: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Motivations for Research

• Dramatic shifts in free nutrient levels 

• Eutrophication

• Effects specific to our area

• Research often done on the Quarry Pond         

Page 3: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Goals and Hypotheses • Determine limiting nutrients in

two different systems • Environment • Landscape positioning• Different levels of human

disturbance

1. The Woodland Pond would be P limited, N limited, or both

2. The Golf Course Pond on would not be limited by either P or N because of artificially introduced chemicals and nutrients

Page 4: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Methods: Study Sites Woodland Pond

Pond at Old Hickory Golf Course  

Average depth: 2.1 m,  pH 7.5, N:P ratio 45:1 Leech et al. SRF Summer Research

Page 5: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Methods: Experimental Design 

• Filtered 500 mL through an 11-micron mesh 

• 3 replicates per treatment

• 500 µL of nutrients added

• 5 days

Page 6: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Methods Continued… • 50 mL sampled and filtered

• GF/F filters placed in 10 mL acetone for 12 hrs

• Fluorometer used to measure chlorophyll in ug/L

• Kruskal-Wallis

Page 7: Bioassay of Two Ponds

p = 0.08, no significance 

Page 8: Bioassay of Two Ponds

p = 0.10, no significance

Page 9: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Discussion

• Woodland Pond: – Variation? – Nitrogen– Zooplankton – Clumping of algae – Light

Page 10: Bioassay of Two Ponds

• Golf Course Pond: Decrease? – Protists– Zooplankton– Clumping of algae– Light– Too many nutrients?

Page 11: Bioassay of Two Ponds

Further Research

• Maximum production rate• Seasonal Variation • Controlled experimentation on mixotrophic

protists• Specific species present in each

Page 12: Bioassay of Two Ponds

References

• On the Strategy of "Eating Your Competitor": A Mathematical Analysis of Algal MixotrophyT. Frede Thingstad, Harry Havskum, Kristine Garde and Bo RiemannEcology , Vol. 77, No. 7 (Oct., 1996), pp. 2108-2118

• Rossignol, Karen L., Hans W. Paerl, John M. Fear, and Jeremy S. Braddy. "Nutrients in Precipitation and the Phytoplankton Responses to Enrichment in Surface Waters of the Albemarle Peninsula, NC, USA after the Establishment of a Large-scale Chicken Egg Farm." Hydrobiologia (2010): 181-91. Print.

• Hitchman, Richard B., and Harriet L. Jones. "The Role of Mixotrophic Protists in the Population Dynamics of the Microbial Food Web in a Small Artificial Pond." Freshwater Biology 43.2 (2000): 231-41. Print.

• Koh, Kyungjoon, Greg E. Bell, and Justin Moss. "Nutrient Runoff during Natural Rainfall Event from Golf Course Fairways." Horticulture and Landscape Architecture: Oklahoma State University (2007). Print.