Top Banner
BIM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE BIC2016 | LISBON, OCTOBER 13&14 BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3* Carmona, Covadonga; Carrato, Alfredo Madrid, Spain * Full article at https://www.academia.edu/29639430/BIM_Project_Execution_Plans_and_Open_BIM_via_IFC2x3
16

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

Feb 15, 2017

Download

Engineering

Alfredo Carrato
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEBIC2016 | LISBON, OCTOBER 13&14

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3*

Carmona, Covadonga; Carrato, AlfredoMadrid, Spain

* Full article at https://www.academia.edu/29639430/BIM_Project_Execution_Plans_and_Open_BIM_via_IFC2x3

Page 2: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM (Project) Execution Plan

BPEPs contain the following information:

• Project Information.• Responsible Parties.• Goals and BIM Uses.• Model/s Structure.• Collaboration Strategy.• Schedules & Deliverables.

2.1. Guides and Templates for the Creation of BIM Project Execution Plans

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 2BIC2016 | Lisbon

According to BSI PAS 1192-2:2013, “

1. Introduction

Page 3: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM (Project) Execution Plan

BPEPs contain the following information:

• Project Information.• Responsible Parties.• Goals and BIM Uses.• Model/s Structure.• Collaboration Strategy.• Schedules & Deliverables.• BIM Interoperability & Quality Control.

3.1. Open Standards for BIM

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 3BIC2016 | Lisbon

According to BSI PAS 1192-2:2013: “

Page 4: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 4BIC2016 | Lisbon

2. Materials and Method

4.1. buildingSMART CV2.0 certified software reports

IFC2x3

IFC2x3

Page 5: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 5BIC2016 | Lisbon

5.1. buildingSMART CV2.0 certified software reports

IFC2x3

IFC2x3

Page 6: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 6BIC2016 | Lisbon

6.1. buildingSMART CV2.0 certified software reports

IFC2x3

IFC2x3

Page 7: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 7BIC2016 | Lisbon

7.1. buildingSMART CV2.0 certified software reports

IFC2x3

IFC2x3

Page 8: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 8BIC2016 | Lisbon

Beam_01 / 2x3 10 concepts analyzedSlab 02A / 2x3 24 concepts analyzed

Window 01 / 2x3 22 concepts analyzed

56 concepts analyzedx 4 authoring tools

224 concepts analyzed

8.1. buildingSMART CV2.0 certified software reports

Page 9: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 9BIC2016 | Lisbon

3. Results and Discussion

Supported Restricted Not Supported

Beam_01 / 2x3

Bentley AECOsim 8 80,00% 0,00% 2 20,00%

Nemetschek Allplan 7 70,00% 3 30,00% 0,00%

Graphisoft ArchiCAD 8 80,00% 1 10,00% 1 10,00%

Autodesk Revit 6 60,00% 4 40,00% 0,00%

Slab 02A / 2x3

Bentley AECOsim 17 70,80% 0,00% 7 29,20%

Nemetschek Allplan 9 37,50% 3 12,50% 12 50,00%

Graphisoft ArchiCAD 14 58,30% 1 4,16% 9 37,54%

Autodesk Revit 9 37,50% 2 8,33% 13 54,17%

Window 01 / 2x3

Bentley AECOsim 19 86,36% 0,00% 3 13,64%

Nemetschek Allplan 16 72,73% 0,00% 6 27,27%

Graphisoft ArchiCAD 15 68,18% 1 4,55% 6 27,27%

Autodesk Revit 13 59,09% 4 18,18% 5 22,73%

24 100,00%

22 100,00%

Concepts analyzed

10 100,00%

9.1. Export of building elements to IFC2x3 by differentBIM authoring tools

Page 10: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

Supported Restricted Not Supported

Beam_01 / 2x3 6 60,00% 4 40,00% 0,00% 10 100,00%

Slab 02A / 2x3 9 37,50% 2 8,33% 13 54,17% 24 100,00%

Window 01 / 2x3 13 59,09% 4 18,18% 5 22,73% 22 100,00%

Concepts analyzed

Supported Restricted Not Supported

Beam_01 / 2x3 8 80,00% 0,00% 2 20,00% 10 100,00%

Slab 02A / 2x3 17 70,80% 0,00% 7 29,20% 24 100,00%

Window 01 / 2x3 19 86,36% 0,00% 3 13,64% 22 100,00%

Concepts analyzed

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 10BIC2016 | Lisbon

• Best average results – Bentley AECOsim

78.57% of supported concepts, best overall export in Window 01 / 2x3 (86.36% of accuracy).

• Worst average results – Autodesk Revit

50.00% of supported concepts, lowest global accuracy in Slab 02A / 2x3 (37.50%).

10.1. Export of building elements to IFC2x3by Bentley AECOsim

10.2. Export of building elements to IFC2x3by Autodesk Revit

Page 11: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 11BIC2016 | Lisbon

11.1. Combination analyses of exported building elements to IFC2x3

Page 12: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 12BIC2016 | Lisbon

4. Conclusions

12.1. Sample IFC2x3 models from different BIM authoring toolsCourtesy of AGi architects

Page 13: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 13BIC2016 | Lisbon

• As the number of building elements and/orthe number of BIM authoring tools rises,the number of unsupported IFC2x3 itemsincreases too.

• Unsupported items start rising linearly, butsoon experience an exponential growth.

• Therefore, interoperability issues should beaddressed thoroughly in BIM ExecutionPlans prior to any modeling, in order toanticipate and minimize – at a lower cost –potential problems that may arise.

• The ideal (utopian?) situation would reveala flat number of unsupported items –tending to zero – regardless the number ofbuilding elements and/or BIM authoringtools that are employed in the project.

Page 14: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 14BIC2016 | Lisbon

14.1 IFC – Levels of MaturityCredits: Keenliside, Liebich, Grobler (2012)

Page 15: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 15BIC2016 | Lisbon

5. References

• buildingSMART. CV 2.0 / Export - Bentley Systems, Incorporated AECOsim Building Designer. 18/12/2015. [Online] Available at http://87.106.145.222/ords/ifc/certification/getCertificationReport/481. 04/06/2016.

• buildingSMART. CV 2.0 / Export – NEMETSCHEK Allplan Allplan 2013. 03/05/2013.[Online] Available at http://87.106.145.222/ords/ifc/certification/getCertificationReport/102. 04/06/2016.

• buildingSMART. CV 2.0 / Export – GRAPHISOFT ArchiCAD. 25/09/2014.[Online] Available at http://87.106.145.222/ords/ifc/certification/getCertificationReport/101. 04/06/2016.

• buildingSMART. CV 2.0 / Export – Autodesk-R Autodesk Revit. 04/05/2013.[Online] Available at http://87.106.145.222/ords/ifc/certification/getCertificationReport/103. 04/06/2016.

• buildingSMART. Comparison RV & DTV. 10/07/2015. [Online] Available athttp://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/ifc-view-definition/ifc4-reference-view/comparison-rv-dtv#entity. 30/10/2016.

Page 16: BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3

BIM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEBIC2016 | LISBON, OCTOBER 13&14

BIM Project Execution Plans and Open BIM via IFC2x3 16BIC2016 | Lisbon

Thank you very much for your attention! Muito obrigado pela sua atenção!

Covadonga Carmona: [email protected]

Alfredo Carrato: [email protected]