KIT – Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Institute for Economics (ECON) www.kit.edu “Bid More, Pay Less” – Overbidding and the Bidder’s Curse in Teleshopping Auctions LH1: Auctions – Stony Brook Center for Game Theory, NY, July 17 th , 2017 Fabian Ocker E-Mail: [email protected]
12
Embed
“Bid More, Pay Less” –Overbidding and the Bidder’s Curse ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
KIT – Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Institute for Economics (ECON)
www.kit.edu
“Bid More, Pay Less” – Overbidding and the Bidder’s Curse in Teleshopping AuctionsLH1: Auctions – Stony Brook Center for Game Theory, NY, July 17th, 2017
Amyx and Luehlfing (2006) with a data set of 416 online auctions.
First evidence for overbidding when simultaneously a fixed price is available.
9% of overbidding, 14% mean percentage of overbidding.
Malmendier and Lee (2011) with two data sets of 2,200 online auctions.
Name the overbidding phenomenon as “Bidder’s Curse”.
42%/48% of Bidder’s Curse, 2%/10% mean percentage of overbidding.
Best explanation approach for Bidder’s Curse is limited attention.
Schneider (2016) with a data set of 552 online auctions.
Limited attention is a ”premature” explanation approach.
Search costs for price information need to be considered.
23% of Bidder’s Curse.
Freeman, Kimbrough and Reiss (2017) conduct a laboratory experiment.
Overbidding increases when search costs for price information are high.
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
8
Data Set
Auction outcomes from January 19th to March 23rd, 2016 (65 days).
Crawler (in C#) wrote data from www.1-2-3.tv in MS Excel.
Each submitted bid is reported (around 700,00 bids).
à Note: reported bid = sold good
Date, product, distribution channel, uniform price, online-shop price, etc.
Several contributions to existing literature:
Substantially greater data set.Systematic analysis across different product categories.
Extension of the analysis to multi-unit auctions.
Consideration of teleshopping auctions.
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
9
Theoretic Analysis
IPV-model of the 1-2-3.tv auction:
Valuation of bidder depends solely on own signal.
Individual signal is known by each bidder before the auction.
Valuations of other bidders are unknown (distribution common knowledge).
Assumption: No transaction costs.
Analysis of bidding strategy (following Malmendier and Lee, 2011):
Extension of the multi-unit Dutch auction to a two-stage game:
First stage: Multi-unit auction with uniform pricing (HRB/LAB).
Second stage: Purchase of goods for a fixed price.
Furthermore: Distinction of single-unit and multi-unit demand.
Main result: Rational bidders do not overbid the online shop fixed price.
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
11
Do bidders in the 1.2.3.tv auctions behave according to theory?
Hypothesis 1 (Overbidding in 1-2-3.tv auctions): Bidders do not submit bids higher than the simultaneously available online shop price for the same good.
Hypothesis 2 (Bidder’s Curse in 1-2-3.tv auctions): None of the final uniform auction prices exceed the simultaneously available online shop prices.
Hypotheses and Results (1/2)
Findings
Finding 1 (Overbidding in 1-2-3.tv auctions): In 25.55% of all auctions, bids are higher than the simultaneously available online shop price for the same good.
Finding 2 (Bidder’s Curse in 1-2-3.tv auctions): In 5.18% of all auctions, the final uniform auctions price is higher than the simultaneously available online shop price.
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
12
What are influencing factors for overbidding and the Bidder’s Curse?
Finding 3 (Search cost in 1-2-3.tv auctions - overbidding): Offline-bidders overbid greater and more often than online-bidders:
Relative frequency of overbidding of 26.77% (19.88%) for offline (online) bidders,
Average percentage of overbidding of 9.67% (8.98%) for offline (online) bidders.
Finding 4 (Search cost in 1-2-3.tv auctions – Bidder’s Curse): Offline-bidders do not experience the Bidder’s Curse more often than online-bidders:
Relative frequency of Bidder’s Curse of 5.31% (4.66%) for offline (online) bidders,
Average percentage of Bidder’s Curse of 5.84% (5.61%) for offline (online) bidders.
Finding 5 (Learning effect in 1-2-3.tv auctions): The Top 10 most frequent customers do not experience a learning effect,but overbid greater and more often than the average 1-2-3.tv customer.
The most frequent customer submitted 488 bids with total expenses of 37,625€.
Hypotheses and Results (2/2)
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
13
We find that overbidding and the Bidder’s Curse are also present in
multi-unit teleshopping auctions.
However, the frequency of the Bidder’s Curse is (far) lower than in
studies on single-unit auctions.
We argue that this is due to multi-unit auctions with uniform pricing.
Here, overbidding does not mandatorily result in the Bidder’s Curse.
In other words, overbidding is less risky.
We find that offline-bidders overbid greater and more often than online-bidders, and reason – in line with recent scientific work – that
this is linked to different search costs of these two types of bidders.
Further research could focus on …
… empirical investigation of other formats of teleshopping auctions.
… other shops that offer two sales channels.
Summary and Outlook
Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)
14
Thank you for your attention!
16.07.17
M.Sc. Fabian Ocker
Institute for Economics (ECON)Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT)