BIBLICAL GUIDANCE FOR EFFECTIVE PASTORAL LEADERSHIP LARRY V. BROWN (Partly Reflective) August 21, 2010 1
BIBLICAL GUIDANCE FOR EFFECTIVE PASTORAL LEADERSHIP
LARRY V. BROWN
(Partly Reflective)
August 21, 2010
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
PERSONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE 4
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF CHURCH GROWTH 7
DISCIPLESHIP AND EVANGELISM 9
THE HEALTHY CHURCH 10
“SPLASH” 15
CHURCH CONFLICT AND REVIVAL 16
CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES 18
ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF PRAYER 19
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 20
BIBLIOGRAPHY 23
2
INTRODUCTION
Pastoral leadership is integral to both the health and
growth of a church. Effective biblical leadership can move a
church into evangelistic growth and effective discipleship, while
weak or unfocused leadership can allow a church to tread water or
even flounder.
Although the course addresses many useful topics, a primary
lesson for me was in better understanding biblical leadership.
This paper discusses several areas where my personal leadership
style and methods have been challenged and strengthened. While
the course material is extensive, it demonstrates several common
themes: (1) the pastor sets the tone for evangelism throughout
the ministry, (2) the pastor’s personal prayer and devotional
life are integral to his and the ministry’s success, and (3)
contemporary pastors must face the realities of a postmodern
society to critically assess the ministry structure as a means to
evangelism.
The first two common themes are interrelated – the
leadership of the pastor sets the course for the entire ministry,
and the pastor must maintain a healthy Christian walk to
3
effectively lead a Christian ministry. Given the first point, a
pastor must strike a balance involving as many congregants as
possible in active ministry. If the pastor is too dominant a
personality, others may feel little need to get involved, as the
pastor “runs” everything regardless of others’ input. Conversely,
a too-passive pastor cannot effectively proclaim and steer the
mission of the church. In many ecclesiastical denominations,
pastors are assigned, rather than selected by the local church.
In more democratic denominations, and perhaps especially among
Southern Baptists, “the leadership role … is highly ambiguous”1
and is defined by the dynamics between the congregation,
deacons/elders, and the pastor. Given these challenges, and the
weightiness of his vocation, a pastor must vigilantly maintain a
personal ministry reliant on Scripture, prayer, and the Holy
Spirit, rather than self.
The third common thread may be the most significant new
aspect of the readings. As specified in the Great Commission, the
purpose of a Christian ministry is to evangelize and disciple -
1 Larry C. Ingram, "Leadership, Democracy, and Religion: Role Ambiguity Among Pastors in Southern Baptist Churches." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 20, no. 2 (1981): 122. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed August 11, 2010).
4
regardless of the place, the era, or the cultural climate. The
course readings and lectures consistently emphasize the need to
abandon “church as usual,” and to restructure the ministry to
holistically integrate all activities around the core mission of
discipleship/evangelization.
PERSONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE
While every minister possesses overlapping traits of
multiple leadership styles, my predominant style has been that of
a consensus-builder. However, as detailed in the discussion
below, this course has challenged me to be more assertive in
leadership, despite the fact that this seems contrary to my
nature. My pre-seminary training and experiences have been
primarily with other degreed professionals – in such a setting,
consensus-building was an effective leadership style. In
ministry, however, leadership – as all areas of our lives – is
subject to the guidelines and examples of Scripture.
As a former Naval officer, my leadership training was
heavily focused on task/mission completion. In this secular
setting, leadership is more short-term focused. Conversely,
pastoral leadership has short term focuses, but an emphasis on
5
long-term – even eternal – goals and objectives, such as
discipleship and evangelism. As a long-time student of secular
leadership methods, my reflexive tendency is to employ these
methods, but such secular methods can be very different from the
methods needed or appropriate in a ministerial setting.2
Following Jesus’ example, Christian leaders must learn and
practice the paradoxical concept of servant leadership. Biblical
servant leadership is serving “God through investing in others
who together accomplish a task for God’s glory."3 The most
important principle of servant-leadership is serving the
“servants of the Servant.”4 This reflects Jesus’ model – while he
had the position of full authority and power, he used that
position to serve others rather than himself. This is contrary to
the world’s concept and model of leadership – but if the humanist
world advances self through leadership, it is less surprising
that the follower of Christ advances others over self.
2 John MacArthur, Pastoral Ministry: How to Shepherd Biblically. (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2005), 233.
3 Trinity Western University. “Servant Leadership.” http://www.twu.ca/academics/graduate/leadership/servant-leadership/
4 Darrell Robinson, Total Church-Life: How to Be a First Century Church in a 21st Century World. (Nashville, TN: B&H Books, 1997), 59.
6
In my own ministry, I consider I have been more focused on
discipleship than evangelism. This discipleship has been both
beneficial for my students and edifying for me – but it has not
had enough evangelistic focus or fruit. I have previously felt
that my ministry was primarily to other believers, but that is an
incomplete and inadequate view of ministry. Further, my
discipling efforts have been incomplete, as they have focused on
a believer’s personal growth and refinement, but have not
stressed evangelism. MacArthur states “pastoral leadership is to
guard and shepherd the flock of God, which includes all that it
takes to bring the church to maturity.”5 To bring an individual
or a church to maturity, evangelism cannot be overlooked or dealt
with less than fully.
Biblical leadership must be rooted in the faith “that God is
at the very center of our world and work, our identity.”6 Keeping
our leadership centered on Christ and his Word, seeking the
guidance of the Holy Spirit, and bathing every day and every
decision in prayer will both yield more effective Kingdom results
5 MacArthur, 233.6 James P. Bartz. “Leadership From the Inside Out.” Anglican Theological
Review, 91 no 1 (2009): 91. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, (accessed August 11, 2010).
7
than we can accomplish in our own strength, and provide an
example for those we minister to or influence.
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF CHURCH GROWTH
This course, by name and nature, has focused on church
growth. Church growth, however, is neither a merely numerical
measurement, nor accomplished by a shift of believers from one
local church to another. Rather, church growth involves winning
souls to Christ through evangelistic outreach, and discipling
both new converts and long-time believers to growth in Christ.
Two fundamental discussions or concepts in the course have
been “plowing, planting, harvesting,”7 and “Back to Basics.”8 As
Falwell notes, if plowing (preparing with prayer) and planting
(sharing the Gospel message) are effectively practiced, the
harvest is a natural result. In 1 Cor 3:6, Paul demonstrates the
role of the Holy Spirit in salvation when he states how he and
Apollos had a role in verbalizing and reinforcing the Gospel
(plowing/sowing), but that it was God who actually worked in
people’s hearts (producing the harvest). Falwell further notes
7 Jonathan Falwell, Innovate Church. (Nashville, TN: B&H Books, 2008), 125-126, et al.
8 Ibid., 117-147.8
that it is unrealistic to expect a harvest without plowing and
planting – barring divine intervention, people are not going to
spontaneously come to faith and begin flooding our churches.9
As noted in course discussion boards, the Back to Basics
model seems to me much more effective at evangelism and church
growth than other programs/methods I’ve experienced. Most church
structure reflects well-meaning but disjointed activities. My
experience has been that in many churches fellowship is the key
emphasis – despite what published mission statements may say.
Fellowship is generally internally focused, and as a result
evangelism – by nature externally focused - suffers. The Back to
Basics model is true to its name in that it bases everything from
outreach to organization on New Testament example and
instruction.
Taken together, “plowing, planting, harvesting” and “Back to
Basics” make me feel more prepared for future ministries in that
they are (1) simpler and more direct than other methods, and (2)
strongly biblically based. This combination, with these
9 Ibid., 126.9
advantages, seem both adaptable to differing ministry situations
and more reliant on God’s methods than man’s experiences.
DISCIPLESHIP AND EVANGELISM
Even more than previous courses on discipleship and
evangelism, or perhaps building on previous courses, this course
has provided discipleship and evangelism concepts and methods
that seem for me more usable and personally comfortable. Perhaps
by divine design, the material provided in this course has
“meshed” with my recent Christian experiences. Prior to coming to
Lynchburg and beginning seminary, I attended an Athens, Georgia,
satellite of Andy Stanley’s church that (not surprisingly) used
the principles and methods outlined in 7 Practices of Effective Ministry.10
In Lynchburg, I attend Thomas Road Baptist Church, where Jonathan
Falwell pastors, and I have participated in Rod Dempsey’s
Community Group training prior to co-leading a Thomas Road
Community Group. All these factors have coalesced to make the
course material especially relevant for me, and having personally
10 Andy Stanley, et al., 7 Practices of Effective Ministry. Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah Books, 2004.
10
seen the results, more credible than unfamiliar (but perhaps
equally valid) programs/methods.
Despite my previous personal exposure to the course methods,
I had not recognized the underlying concepts prior to this
course. As noted earlier, my previous discipleship has not
stressed evangelism, but I can now better see the integral
interrelationship of evangelism and discipleship. The course
material has helped integrate the concepts of assimilation, as
well as multiplication and mentoring, as parts of a holistic and
interdependent discipleship/evangelization plan.
Given Robinson’s bell curve11 concept, the need for biblical
discipleship becomes even more imperative. In the course
materials, Dempsey stresses several aspects of biblical
discipleship.12 While each are important, the best personal
blending of these into a useful description of biblical self
discipleship is Seeking to increasingly live by Christ’s example and Word to serve
the Kingdom and others while remaining fully dependent on the Vine and the Holy
Spirit, denying self and worldly gain in favor of becoming more like Jesus. Employing
11 Robinson, 193.12 Rod Dempsey, “On Being a Disciple Based Upon Scripture.” Liberty
University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Five.11
these concepts for personal discipleship will better prepare me
to further disciple others, with an end goal of Biblical
multiplication. Such multiplication – reproducing Christ in
others – provides tangible evidence of effective discipleship.
THE HEALTHY CHURCH
A healthy church is one that engages in genuine worship, is
led by a competent devoted Christian minister, meaningfully
involves all the members, stresses discipleship, and serves the
community with outreach and evangelism. The best model for a
church of any era is the Early Church described in Acts 2-3.
Further, and consistent with the example of the Early Church, a
healthy church should actively seek to fulfill the Great
Commission. For me the Great Commission has become a personal
blending of two of Jesus' last recorded instructions:
“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations - witnessingin Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end ofthe earth - baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe allthat I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always,to the end of the age." Matthew 28:19-20; Acts 1:8 (ESV, adapted)
12
While recognizing it is highly irregular to blend/adapt verses,
let me stress that this is a personal blending, not for use in
teaching or instruction (in such a context, I would likely start
with Matthew 28, then note how "all nations" is amplified in Acts
1). However, I feel this blending is warranted in the context of
this discussion, and with the above explanations.
These passages are noteworthy because they detail Jesus'
parting instructions, his last reminders, to his disciples. Of
note, the first verb is "go," which demands much more than a
passive attitude toward evangelization. Other verbs are similarly
active and compelling: witness, baptize, teach - again stressing that
evangelism is not an armchair undertaking. If we take the order
of actions in the Great Commission, go, witness, and baptize all
come before teach; I consider the earlier actions lead up to
teaching/discipleship. The earlier steps are not necessarily
subordinate to teaching, but new Christians are less likely to be
effective in their witness or their personal walk without
discipleship: “the method in carrying out the Great Commission
involves preaching…and teaching the Word.”13
13 Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Second Edition. (Grand Rapids MI: Baker Academic, 2001), 524.
13
As Dr. Earley notes, a Great Commission Church is a healthy
church, and vice versa.14 A Great Commission Church is definitely
one involved in and focused on spiritual growth and evangelism.
However, while Dr. Earley maintains the youngest churches are the
healthiest,15 I do not agree that this is always the case. On a
recent Sunday I attended the Brooklyn Tabernacle, where genuine
worship, a lack of cultural barriers, and direct expository
preaching continue to result in positive impact for the Kingdom –
and exhibit great church health. Accordingly, I consider the most
effective strategies we have studied to be (1) making the Great
Commission the central theme of the church and its actions, (2)
using the church – individually and corporately, involving as
many members as possible – to meet others’ needs and demonstrate
Christ’s love, (3) a strong reliance on biblical teaching and
preaching throughout the ministry, and (4) constantly seeking
guidance from the Holy Spirit and God’s Word.
Dr. Earley quoted Dr. Falwell that it’s “easier to give
birth than to raise the dead.”16 In our strength, that is true,
14 Dave Earley, “The Healthy Church.” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Six.
15 Ibid.16 Ibid.
14
but in God’s strength, both birth and resurrection have definite
precedent. I do not disagree with Dr. Earley’s church-planting
strategies, but I also do not think we should be too quick to
abandon the existing churches needing revival. Every one of us
should seek the Lord’s guidance in what specific Kingdom role he
has for us – whether in missions, church planting, or serving to
revitalize existing churches.
Engaging laity is definitely a priority of the church. Most
churches today are not doing well in this regard – a phenomenon
not limited to Protestants: a recent Catholic article notes “with
the ecclesiastical hierarchy doing all the work, laypeople [can]
comfortably watch from the sidelines.”17 We are too often content
with increasing the Sunday morning attendance and allowing people
to quietly return to their lives without actively engaging them
or using their talents for the Kingdom. Robinson details five
factors for engaging the laity;18 the most effective means of
engaging laity seem to be inspiring enthusiasm toward a clearly
17 Diane Scharper, “Catholicism Takes Laity Off the Sidelines.” National Catholic Reporter, June 11, 2010, 6a. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, (accessed August 11, 2010).
18 Robinson, 96-106.15
defined goal, then harnessing that enthusiasm to engage members
in ministry, according to their gifts and talents.
Aside from the increased spiritual maturity and feeling of
ownership/responsibility the laity gains from being meaningfully
engaged, there are benefits for the minister as well. A
theological observer recently noted, “There are few vocations
which splinter a man like the pastoral ministry … in the midst of
[the details of running a church] the ministry can easily get
lost in the shuffle.”19 By delegating tasks to church members,
the minister frees time for the more important parts of his
vocation: spending time in personal spiritual growth and in
sermon preparation. I have certainly tended to participate in all
logistics, maintenance, and operations activities in previous
ministries – not to control, but to avoid the perception that I
considered myself above menial tasks. Validly, Criswell notes
that a minister’s busyness does not always equate to church
growth or effective Kingdom service. If the minister delegates
making copies of the bulletin or running errands to a church
19 A. Duane Litfin, "The Nature of the Pastoral Role: The Leader as Completer." Bibliotheca Sacra 139, no. 553 (1982): 57. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed August 11, 2010).
16
member, the minister frees that time for spiritual
development.”20
“SPLASH”
My strongest (or maybe most comfortable) ways to “Show
People Love and Share Him” are likely the first and last – ‘show’
and ‘Him.’ In his PowerPoint presentation, Hemphill used the
phrase “demonstrate before you articulate.”21 While that can be
taken to extremes to excuse evangelical silence in favor of
showing love, it is a logical, practical, and necessary first
step in establishing a rapport with others so that you can
effectively present personal testimony and share Jesus. As
Hemphill notes, effective sharing doesn’t have to involve a
canned or memorized presentation, which he considers may seem
artificial or impersonal.22 The other area in which I do best is
“Him,” knowing that the Gospel – and indeed all of life – is for
and about Jesus Christ. The area I could most improve is often
20 W.A. Criswell, Criswell’s Guidebook for Pastors. Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1980,63.
21 Ken Hemphill, “Introduction to SPLASH.” Liberty University Online, EVAN510 course materials, Week Six.
22 Ibid.17
the ‘share’ component – going from showing/demonstrating love to
verbalizing the Gospel message in a non-Christian or witnessing
setting.
I believe that “meeting people where they are” and praying
for the Holy Spirit to bring people where they need to be are
both valid biblical positions. Aside from the Zaccheus and Woman
at the Well examples of Jesus meeting people where they were, I
think the most relevant biblical example for us in a contemporary
context is Paul in Athens (Acts 17), where he tailored his Jewish
background to relate to the Greeks “where they were.”
CHURCH CONFLICT AND REVIVAL
The church is comprised of people. Despite Christian
redemption, human nature is still very much a factor in churches.
Consequently, conflicts occur and spiritual zeal may be crowded
out by daily routines or pressures. Given these realities, a
minister must be prepared to deal with conflict as well as
spiritual apathy or decline.
Regarding conflict, and as discussed in Matthew 5:9 and 1
Peter 4:8-9 (listed in Frizzell’s Appendix F),23 every minister 23 Gregory R. Frizzell, Releasing the Revival Flood. (Union City, TN: The Master
Design, 2005), 258-264.18
should actively seek to be a peacemaker – though peacemaking
often involves biblical confrontation to resolve conflict. For me
personally, I too often wait to address problems – this may
appear to maintain a superficial peace, but it is not healthy or
effective over time. 1 Peter 4 discusses love covering a
multitude of sins. As ministers, we are divinely called, but
hardly divine. We make mistakes, but a loving attitude towards
others, coupled with genuine compassion, helps us to react better
in trying situations, and fosters a spirit of forgiveness among
those to whom we minister. I need to recognize and address
conflict more boldly, and better minister daily from a basis of
love and concern.
Frizzell’s contention that we should focus on biblical
discipling rather than addressing/resolving specific problems or
patterns is preventive advice well taken.24 Similar to a
physician treating a disease, we may greatly harm the patient by
merely addressing symptoms and failing to recognize and address
the underlying malady causing the symptoms.
24 Frizzell, Gregory R. “An Overview of ‘Releasing the Revival Flood.’” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Seven.
19
In his audio presentation, Frizzell noted that spiritual
battles require spiritual weapons.25 The enemy of our souls is
also the enemy of our church. Active, effective discipling helps
members become prepared for spiritual attack with the full armor
of God. After exposure to the course materials, I consider a
focus on discipling has two benefits with regards to conflict:
(1) it lessens the likelihood of serious conflict by making
members Christ-minded and others-minded, and (2) it helps members
mature spiritually so that they can avoid reacting in fleshly
ways when conflicts do arise.
When such conflicts arise, forgiveness and reconciliation
are desired biblical outcomes; the minister can be instrumental
in effecting such resolution. Even some secular psychologists
have recognized the merit of forgiveness and reconciliation in
long-term conflict resolution, though Christian counselors are
still more likely than secular psychologists to seek/stress
reconciliation in addition to forgiveness as part of the
counseling/conflict resolution process.26 25 Ibid.26 Nathan R. Frise and Mark R. McMinn, “Forgiveness and Reconciliation:
The Differing Perspectives of Psychologists and Christian Theologians.” Journal ofPsychology and Theology 38 no 2 (2010): 87. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials,
20
Just as Satan causes strife and discord, he promotes apathy
and “busyness” among believers to distract them from spiritual
activity. Additionally, many believers have implicitly developed
the attitude that “church exists to meet my needs,”27 rather than
seeking to serve the Kingdom by serving others. Consequently,
church leaders must reinvigorate members through revival efforts.
Traditionally, churches hold special revival services, often with
visiting pastors or evangelists. While these revivals may
temporarily heighten spiritual fervor, most tend to have a short-
lived effect. Rather than (or perhaps in addition to) traditional
revival services, I consider ongoing discipleship and
meaningfully involved laity seem a better and more consistent
approach to combat spiritual apathy.
CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES
While ministers of every era have faced challenges,
contemporary ministers must face the reality of postmodern, post-
Christian society. Postmodern society has embraced relativism and
secular humanism, with a rejection of absolutes. Consequently, if
(accessed August 11, 2010).27 Matt Willmington, “Mythbusters: The Church Exists to Meet My Needs.”
(Sermon, Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, VA, June 13, 2010). 21
a non-believer considers wrongdoing a relative concept, it is
much more difficult to even convince him of the reality of sin,
much less his need for redemption from that sin. However,
regardless of our perception of contemporary society, we must
remember that we serve an omniscient, all-powerful God: we walk
by faith, not by sight (2 Cor 5:7). We can move confidently
forward by continuing to obey biblical instruction with full
faith in God and his ability to transform even the most
challenging evangelistic candidate.28
In our postmodern society, the first question for ministers
may not now be “’How do we grow our churches?,’ but rather ‘How
do we transform our community?’”29 If we as Christians biblically
and effectively serve and impact the community, church growth
will occur as a by-product – not as the primary focus of – our
leadership and efforts.30
ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF PRAYER
Failure to maintain personal spiritual intimacy is likely
the single most dangerous area for a minister – as men acting in
28 Bartz, 91.29 Ibid., 90.30 Ibid.
22
our own strength, failing to maintain personal spiritual intimacy
jeopardizes all other areas of responsibility and trust. The
primary means of maintaining spiritual intimacy is through
prayer, complemented by study of the Word. As ministers, we seek
to make both an immediate and an eternal impact on those to whom
we minister. Without prayer, we cannot impact others on a
sustained basis – as Dr. Falwell often said, “Nothing of eternal
importance is ever accomplished apart from prayer.”31
It seems a strange paradox that we in ministry would have to
struggle to maintain personal spiritual intimacy, but I see
myself as a prime example of spending so much time and busyness
helping others or overseeing activities that our own personal
devotional and prayer time becomes stale and unfruitful. While we
spend much time teaching or learning about God and the Bible, we
may not spend enough time with God and the Bible. The remedy is
in James 1:5, and more pointedly in John 15:4-6:
“Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit byitself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me
31 Christianity Today International, “Finding Their Own Voice” http://www.christianitytoday.com/le/preachingworship/preaching/findingyourownvoice.html?start=2
23
and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.” (ESV, emphasis added).
Abiding in Jesus – resting in, relying on, and trusting Jesus –
is the solution, despite our tiredness, our busyness, or our
distractions.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Neither ministry nor leadership is easily or quickly
learned; ministerial leadership is never fully mastered.
Regardless of our years of experience, to effectively lead God’s
people we must constantly and consciously cultivate our spiritual
intimacy and knowledge of the Word. This, coupled with the
leading of the Holy Spirit, will better enable us to serve as a
shepherd and servant leader to God’s people.
MacArthur notes “pastors cannot tread water”32 – if we do
not actively lead members forward in discipleship and evangelism,
we will lose ground. Adapting the adage “the good king is one
32 MacArthur, 242.24
whose subjects prosper,” one writer notes “the good pastor is the
one whose congregation prospers.”33
This course has challenged me most by refining my
understanding of biblical discipleship, and by forcing my
realization that shepherding/leading God’s people requires
constant communion with the Lord and his Word. Despite the
sophistication and technology of our times, we need to “take a
giant leap backward toward the process of leadership outlined in
the narrative of Scripture.”34 We cannot tackle postmodernity in
our own strength, but God can – to be a part of that, we must
learn, practice, and model God’s ways as outlined in Scripture.
I cannot summarize this paper or my learning from this
course better than a passage I found in MacArthur’s writings, a
passage that resonates with me on every reading:
“God has not called us to be professional clergymen; Hehas called us to be disciple-makers. Paul’s mandate in 2 Timothy 2:2 extends to every leader of the ekklesia of God: ‘The things which you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses, these entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also.’ This may be the best one-verse
33 Litfin, 64.34 Bartz, 89.
25
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bartz, James P. “Leadership From the Inside Out.” Anglican Theological Review, 91 no 1 (2009): 81-92. ATLA Religion Databasewith ATLASerials, (accessed August 11, 2010).
Criswell, W.A. Criswell’s Guidebook for Pastors. Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1980.
Dempsey, Rod. “On Being a Disciple Based Upon Scripture.” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Five.
Earley, Dave. “The Healthy Church.” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Six.
Elwell, Walter A. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Second Edition. Grand Rapids MI: Baker Academic, 2001.
Falwell, Jonathan. Innovate Church. Nashville, TN: B&H Books, 2008.
Frise, Nathan R. and McMinn, Mark R. “Forgiveness and Reconciliation: The Differing Perspectives of Psychologists and Christian Theologians.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 38 no 2 (2010): 83-90. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, (accessed August 11, 2010).
Frizzell, Gregory R. “An Overview of ‘Releasing the Revival Flood.’” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Seven.
_______. Releasing the Revival Flood. Union City, TN: The Master Design, 2005.
Hemphill, Ken. “Introduction to SPLASH.” Liberty University Online, EVAN 510 course materials, Week Six.
Ingram, Larry C. "Leadership, Democracy, and Religion: Role Ambiguity Among Pastors in Southern Baptist Churches." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 20, no. 2 (1981): 119-
27
129. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessedAugust 11, 2010).
Litfin, A. Duane. "The Nature of the Pastoral Role: The Leader as Completer." Bibliotheca Sacra 139, no. 553 (1982): 57-66. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost(accessed August 11, 2010).
MacArthur, John. Pastoral Ministry: How to Shepherd Biblically. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2005.
Robinson, Darrell. Total Church-Life: How to Be a First Century Church in a21st Century World. Nashville, TN: B&H Books, 1997.
Scharper, Diane. “Catholicism Takes Laity Off the Sidelines.”National Catholic Reporter, June 11, 2010. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, (accessed August 11, 2010).
Stanley, Andy, et al. 7 Practices of Effective Ministry. Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah Books, 2004.
Trinity Western University. “Servant Leadership.” http://www.twu.ca/academics/graduate/leadership/servant-
leadership/
Willmington, Matt. “Mythbusters: The Church Exists to Meet My Needs.” Sermon, Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, VA, June 13, 2010.
28