Page 1
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 1/34
Working Paper Series
Beyond Rigour and Relevance: ACritical Realist Approach toBusiness Education
Jawad SyedKent Business School
John MingersKent Business School
Peter MurrayUniversity of the Sunshine Coast
Working Paper No.191February 2009
ISSN 1748-7595 (Online)
Page 2
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 2/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 2
Beyond Rigour and Relevance: A Critical Realist Approach toBusiness Education
Dr. Jawad Syed and Professor John MingersKent Business School
University of KentCanterbury, Kent CT2 7PE, UK
Email: [email protected] : [email protected]
Associate Professor Peter A. MurrayFaculty of Business
University of the Sunshine CoastQueensland, Australia
Email: [email protected]
Page 3
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 3/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 3
Beyond Rigour and Relevance: A Critical Realist Approach to
Business Education
"Can you do addition?" the White Queen asked. "What's one and one and one and one and one and oneand one and one and one and one?" "I don't know," said Alice. "I lost count."
(Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass)
Abstract This paper takes a critical realist perspective to understand the research-practice
gap in the field of business and management. To investigate issues surrounding the rigour versus
relevance debate, we examine how the divergent perspectives of scholars and practitioners can
be bridged by a critical realist approach in relation to: (1) the research paradigm: instead of
confining their research within methodological purism, scholars may need to deploy any
research paradigm to investigate a phenomenon in its context, (2) context and causality: critical
realism provides an ontological grounding for interpretivist research reaffirming the importance
of a focus on context, meaning and interpretation as causal influences, (3) methodological
rigidity: multiple research methods will be more important when addressing research-practice
gaps since they are more receptive to interdisciplinary functions and contexts in time and space
than traditional methodologies, and (4) ethical aspects of business research highlighting the
need to engage with the knowledge agenda of not only the university but also society overall.
The critical nature of management studies we contend also helps to explain why at least certain
research-practice gaps can be treated as natural because of divergent preferences of scholars
and practitioners.
Key Words: critical management studies; critical realism; management education
Page 4
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 4/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 4
Introduction
In his recent piece in the Financial Times on the accessibility of business research, Michael
Skapinker (2008) argued that unlike their counterparts in law, medicine and engineering,
business school scholars predominantly focus on producing work that is too abstract, jargon-
filled, and theoretical to interest practitioners. Pointing towards the prevailing publish-or-perish
incentives at universities, 1 Skapinker alleges that business scholars “prefer to adorn their work
with scholarly tables, statistics and jargon because it makes them feel like real academics” (para.
12).
Although Skapinker might have overstated the close relationship between research and practice
in medicine and other professions 2, closing the research-practice gap in the field of business and
management is a challenge. Current research practices are equivocal for many scholars; see for
example Ghoshal's (2005) and Ghoshal and Moran's (1996) critique of bad management theories
and Transaction Cost Theory, and Gioia's (2002) critique of a narrow emphasis on shareholder
value. Scientific papers in organisational research contain far too much detail over the methods
and analytical procedures employed according to Gelade (2006). The practical, organisational
implications of research is a major issue for these scholars and business academics are not doing
a good job of educating managers.
1 Such as the need to publish in prestigious peer-reviewed journals to get tenure at a US university or to rank high inthe UK's Research Assessment Exercise (RAE).
2 For example, Klein (2008) suggests us to try asking a family physician about an article we recently read in arenowned medical journal.
Page 5
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 5/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 5
These issues have often been cast in terms of the rigour versus relevance debate (e.g., Bridgman,
2007; Pettigrew, 2001; Reed, 2000; Starkey and Madan, 2001), the presumption being that
management research may be sufficiently rigorous but lacking in relevance. The debate is
strongly related to the distinction between Mode 1 and Mode 2 research originating from the
hard sciences by Gibbons et al (1994). Mode 1 knowledge is the traditional, discipline-based
largely theoretical work aimed at understanding how the world works, while Mode 2 knowledge
is transdisciplinary and is concerned with getting things to work in practice.
To the extent that the research-practice gap has not been sufficiently explored, this paper
illustrates how a critical realist (CR) perspective can address many divergent research
approaches. It explores a CR approach in solving problems related to research design, causality
and context, and methodological rigidity. For research design, it is feasible that multiple research
approaches may work better, not just those located within traditional research paradigms.
Scholars accordingly may need to deploy any research approach as may be required to
investigate a phenomenon in its context. For causality, the need to reaffirm a focus on context,
meaning and interpretation is equally if not more important than one-dimensional studies of a
single phenomena. In relation to methodological rigidity, business problems are multi-
dimensional and cross-functional requiring greater breadth and depth in research. Accordingly,
although abstract, universalistic theories often hold sway, scholars may need to situate their
research within the realist context of time, space and culture.
With CR theory, this paper underscores the need to enhance the ontological component of
business research. Thus, the CR natural and social realism perspective as well as the concepts of
Page 6
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 6/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 6
structures and generative mechanisms (Dobson, 2002; Mingers, 2004a), come sharply into focus.
Critical realism allows for the resolution of research-practice inconsistencies through a
reinterpretation of the activity of research. It offers a notion of causality that is consistent with
the quest for answering the underlying ‘why’ questions posed in business research (Bhaskar,
1978; 1998). It also provides interpretivists with a richer ontology by accepting their
epistemological insights concerning the crucial role of meaning, interpretation, whilst
maintaining the existence of both social and material phenomena (Smith, 2006). We consider CR
as epistemological pluralist (Lipscomb, 2008), useful in recognising the existence of logical
connections between the ontological, epistemological, and methodological premises of research.
The paper is structured as follows. First, we offer an overview of CR (discussed next) and
discuss the importance of methodological plurality within a CR perspective of business research.
Second, we discuss the value of pursuing multiple research paradigms and CR research across
interdisciplinary functions. Third, we explore how CR is a useful approach for the study of a
phenomenon within its context since the focus of research is on interpreting different meanings
and their causal links. Fourth, while seeking to make a contribution to the research-practice gap,
the paper pays special attention to the ethical aspects of business research and how CR plays a
role. Therefore, while we highlight CR's potential to advance business theory and research, we
also argue for a stronger link between various stakeholder groups and a more systematic
approach to the use of cumulative empirical evidence. Overall, our contribution lies in how CR
can be applied to resolve research-practice inconsistencies by reinterpreting the activity of
research, by better connecting causal mechanisms to events in practice, and how the research-
practice gap can be closed.
Page 7
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 7/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 7
Critical Realism
Critical realism was developed primarily by Bhaskar (1978; 1979; 1993) as a way of overcoming
the limitations of existing philosophical paradigms, e.g., empiricism, interpretivism and
postmodernism (also see Adler, Forbes, and Willmott, 2007; Archer et al ., 1998). In recent years
it has generated much interest in a range of disciplines (Ackroyd and Fleetwood, 2000;
Danermark et al., 2002; Fleetwood, 1999; Learmonth, 2007; Mingers, 2009; Mingers, 2004a;
Pawson and Tilley, 1997; Reed, 2005; Sayer, 2000); it seems to offer a way out of the sterile
philosophical debates and into research practice that recognises and tries to address the
complexities of the real world. The primary characteristics of CR are:
• A commitment to a realist ontology, i.e., to the existence of causal mechanisms whose
interactions generate the events and occurrences of the world. These mechanisms may be
unobservable directly (e.g., social structures or ideas and categories) yet we can accept
their existence because of their causal efficacy. This undermines the empiricist illusion of
the primacy of empirical data (the actualist fallacy);
• An epistemology that accepts, with interpretivism, that our knowledge is always socially
and historically relative, but maintains a distinction between the transitive, subject-
dependent aspects of knowledge, and the intransitive domain of the objects of our
knowledge. This undermines the interpretivist and post-modern claims that being itself
must always be limited to human knowledge of that being (the epistemic fallacy) 3;
3 Bhaskar uses this term (epistemic fallacy) to refer to the notion that (the intransitive) reality is exhausted by our(transitive) knowledge of it. In the glossary to his book Plato etc., Bhaskar (1994: 253) defines it as ‘The analysis ordefinition of statements about being in terms of statements about our knowledge (of being)’.
Page 8
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 8/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 8
• A commitment to methodological pluralism based on its pluralist ontology. Since CR
accepts the existence of a variety of structures – material, social and conceptual – it also
accepts that we need a variety of research methods to access them;
• The claim that no social theory can be purely descriptive, it must always be to some
extent evaluative, and thus there can be no positivistic split between facts and values.
And, following from this, the view that social theory is inevitably transformative,
providing an explanatory critique that logically entails action (Mingers, 2009).
While space restricts here a comprehensive discussion of CR, we nonetheless explore CR
concepts which are fundamental to the purpose of this paper; in particular, its conception of
causality, its view of agency and structure; and its view of social science. First, CR draws a
distinction between the events that actually occur (or do not occur despite being expected) and
the underlying structures or mechanisms which generate or cause them. These ‘generative
mechanisms’ are relatively enduring and have causal properties or tendencies. They may be
observable or unobservable and it is their interactions that generate the actual events that occur
(or do not). Only a small subset of these events are observed and recorded empirically to become
relevant to scientific enquiry. The objective of science is then to take these empirical
observations and explain them in terms of underlying generative mechanisms and structures. Its
methodology is retroductive or abductive – it hypothesises mechanisms or structures that, if they
existed , would explain the observed results. In this, it goes beyond empiricism which reduces
science simply to the patterns of empirical events that actually occur (actualism); and beyond
interpretivism or constructivism which reduces the ontology of the world to our experiences of
that world. Moreover, CR maintains a stratified or hierarchical view of causality by observing
Page 9
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 9/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 9
and explaining events within a local context generating causal mechanisms at work. These could
be at a variety of exogenous levels – types of organisations, geographical regions, and cultures,
or endogenous levels: relationships between individuals, groups, and organisations.
Second, CR has a sophisticated view of the interaction between agency and structure. As
developed originally by Bhaskar (1979) it was known as the transformational model of social
action (TMSA) and bore many similarities to Giddens’ (1984) structuration theory. CR argues
that there is an inextricable bond between agency and structure – structure conditions action and
action reproduces or transforms structure - but the two are distinct and yet equally real in an
ontological sense. However, CR recognises that social structures are intrinsically different to
physical structures. In particular, social structure:
• Does not exist independently of social activity;
• Cannot be empirically identified except through such activities;
• Is not independent of actors’ conceptions of their activities;
• Is relative to particular times and cultures.
The concept of social structure was further developed by Archer (1995) to emphasise more
strongly the dualism of action and structure as two equally real, interacting systems (Mingers,
2004b). Agents are causal mechanisms in themselves who act on the basis of their reasons and
motives. However, activity is always conditioned or moulded by a pre-existing social structure of
roles and expectations. In its turn, activity transforms or reproduces the social structure. The
clear distinction between the two can be seen in Archer’s morphogenetic model: at time T1 the
Page 10
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 10/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 10
existing structure conditions actions that are about to take place; at time T2 activity occurs; then
at time T3, as a result of the activity, the social structure is either transformed or reproduced by
the activity.
The third aspect of CR to be considered, and partly why it is called ‘critical’ realism, is its view
that social science is inherently and unavoidably evaluative – value-full rather than value-free
(Bhaskar, 1993; Mingers, 2009). This is, of course, diametrically opposed to the Humean
opposition of facts and values. The first part of the argument is that the subject matter of social
science is itself always already expressed evaluatively and that social science should not try to
reduce or obscure this by redescribing the phenomena in neutral terms. For example, while a)
“John was murdered” and b) “John ceased breathing” may both be true descriptions of the same
event, ‘a’ is to be preferred because: i) it is more accurate and particular – ‘a’ implies ‘b’ but not
vice versa; ii) ‘b’ tends to carry the presumption that John died naturally, since that is more
common, when that is not in fact the case; and iii) ‘a’ maximises the explanatory power of the
theory required to explain it. In social science, ‘facts’ already come with ‘values’ attached. The
second part aims to show that social science is also committed to various kinds of societal
change – explanatory critique. Science seeks to discover the ‘truth’ about society and then to
disseminate that truth. Where it finds groups of people who hold clearly false beliefs about how
society works it must be committed to removing those false beliefs. Furthermore, if social
science identifies social structures or institutions that are maintaining the false beliefs then it is
equally committed to removing them too. If it is not, then it will be committing a ‘performative
contradiction’ that is espousing one view (truth) but acting differently.
Page 11
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 11/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 11
Research Paradigms, Interdisciplinarity and Multimethodology
Business and management schools are in general structured along fairly rigid disciplinary lines
(Knights and Willmott, 1997). In part, this reflects a desire to emulate traditional disciplines such
as sociology and economics, and in part it mirrors the functional organisation imperative often
called the 'silo mentality'. Disciplines such as management science, marketing, HRM, accounting
and strategy have developed their own theories, research paradigms and hierarchy of journals.
In the same way that the complexity of real-world problems requires a degree of
interdisciplinarity, research equally requires different research methods – mixed-method research
(Tashakkori and Teddlie, 2003) or multi-methodology (Mingers and Gill, 1997). While there is
growing acceptance of the value of multi-methodology (see for example a major business
research methods text such as Bryman and Bell (2003)), there is still a degree of resistance by
top journals (Mingers, 2003) and grant awarding bodies. This relates to the conservative and
disciplining nature of the disciplines and to the battles over paradigm incommensurability which
is still fought (Mingers, 2004c).
In his study of research methods in management accounting, Modell (2007) used CR to propose
a framework for validating mixed methods research. This approach is helpful in developing a
coherent philosophical foundation for producing knowledge. Modell notes that in contrast to
contemporary pragmatist thought, implicitly or explicitly guiding much mixed methods research,
CR provides a unified and consistent philosophical foundation for combining research methods
and theories. Similarly, Smith's (2006) study of the 'standard' accounts of research in information
sciences suggests that a predominant reliance on positivism or interpretivism may be a reason for
Page 12
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 12/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 12
persistent research-practice inconsistencies. These inconsistencies are located between
researchers’ stated or implicit ontological assumptions and actual practices and outcomes, calling
for a (re)consideration of the underlying ontological premise of research and practice.
There is also some evidence that CR ethnography can facilitate an expansion of epistemological
boundaries. In their study of research-practice gaps in the nursing profession, Porter and Ryan
(1996) suggest that it is possible for researchers to give due attention to social structures without
losing focus on individuals. They argue that CR ethnography works under the assumption that
the relationship between social structures and individual actors involves a bilateral process.
While the enabling and constraining structural conditions influence individual actions, those
actions in turn either maintain or transform social structures. Porter and Ryan conclude that the
theory-practice gap in nursing is neither the result of clinicians' ignorance of nor antipathy to
theory, but is largely generated by the lack of resources available to nurses, which in turn is a
reflection of the social structure of capitalism within which nurses operate. Similarly, in their
exploration of the notion of CR in the nursing profession, McEvoy and Richards (2003) argued
that CR provides a coherent framework for evaluation research that is based on the
understanding of causal mechanisms.
In his book on CR and education research, Scott (2000) offers a 'transcendental realist'
alternative to the false dichotomy of empiricism/hermeneutics and, by so doing argues in
'defence of educational research’ (p. 7). Transcendental realism has its roots in Kantian
philosophy implying that individuals have a perfect understanding of the limitations of their own
minds. Scott adopts this approach in two main stages. First he argues for a transcendental realist
Page 13
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 13/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 13
framework for analysing academic research. He then utilises this framework in engagements
with the areas of dispute, foci and approaches in research, before setting out the way forward.
Scott compares empiricism and radical relativism with transcendental realism. He addresses the
ontological question of how educational activities are structured and the methodological
consequences for researching these activities. Ontologically, Scott defines the object of study of
educational research as comprising the relationship between structure and agency;
epistemologically, he highlights the value-embeddedness of research practice; and
methodologically he suggests that social research must incorporate an ethnographic or qualitative
element.
Although the hermeneutic approach has arguably become dominant within large swathes of the
sociology of education, quantitative research remains the firm favourite of educational managers
seeking definite answers to practical problems and legitimation of their policy decisions (Maton,
2001). Scott (2000) confronts beliefs in this approach with four main problems: the ways in
which systematic unpredictability undermines predictive claims; its misunderstanding of the
nature of open and closed systems 4; its conflation of association with causation; and its
wholesale neglect of the intentionality of social life. He outlines various views of the relationship
between theory and practice, which either identify knowledge with theory or with practice, or
argues for their difference. Scott builds upon such realist ideas as the epistemic fallacy and
morphogenesis 5 to argue that one needs to analyse educational knowledge in terms of power
4 In closed systems, the external conditions of causal mechanism remain constant to allow them to operateconsistently. In open systems, an object has powers and capabilities that are causally efficacious (Archer, 1995;Bhaskar, 1993).
5 The literal meaning of morphogenesis is the physical process that gives rise to the shape of an organism. In CR, itis a conceptualisation of the dynamic nature of relations between structure and agency.
Page 14
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 14/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 14
relations, relational structures, differential allocation of resources, the operation of sanctions and
rewards, re-contextualisation, and many other factors. In sum, there is significant value in
researchers connecting the epistemological, methodological, and ontological nature of research
in practice.
Context and Causality
In resolving rigour versus relevance inconsistencies, CR can provide a different notion of
causality that allows for the capturing of the underlying ‘why’ questions posed in research.
Furthermore, it may give a solid ontological grounding for interpretivist research reaffirming the
importance for a focus on context, meanings, and interpretation as causal influences without
unnecessarily denying their existence (Smith, 2006).
Pettigrew (1997a) argues that “the challenges for management research are best captured in a
series of concurrent double hurdles which together raise a wide spectrum of cognitive, social and
political demands on our skills and knowledge as researchers” (p. 291). This argument is
consistent with Morgan's (1983) who refers to a narrower landscape of knowledge, highlighting
the need of 'conscious pluralism'. Pettigrew (1997b) suggests that it is important to elevate user
engagement and embeddedness to a principal of research method contextualising of knowledge
as a generic ambition of scientific endeavour (Nowotny et al., 2001). Indeed, variation in
organisational, institutional, and national context can shape patterns of managerial behaviour and
organisational outcomes (Pettigrew, 2001).
Page 15
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 15/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 15
Yet another contextual factor is the ethical considerations of institutions and individual
researchers (e.g., their commitment to issues related to diversity or social responsibility). There
is thus a multitude of factors, all of which may have divergent, possibly conflicting implications
for management education and research. In sum, we argue that the contextual nature of
management research and education and the causality of various structural forces must be taken
into account in understanding the critical nature of management scholarship. Thus, while it is
possible to find some common expectations from management scholars (e.g., in terms of the
quality of their teaching and research), in depth stratifications of such expectations (or
requirements) may generate different critical realities of management scholarship which remain
shaped by the forces of socio-political and economic context, culture, space and time. In other
words, any universalistic or simplistic approach to management learning and research may not be
a feasible option.
Methodological Rigidity: Rigour and Relevance
Along with the disciplinary boundaries that confine research practice, methodological rigidity
exists. Historically, management research was founded on a positivist or empiricist approach and
largely remained so until Burrell and Morgan’s (1979) enunciation of organisational paradigms.
Although this established the validity of alternative research methodologies, much business
academic research remains founded on issues of experimental design derived from the hard
sciences, which become the driving force in selecting research questions rather than the needs of
practitioners. It is hardly surprising then that academic research often does not address the
questions and problems that trouble practitioners.
Page 16
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 16/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 16
For an example of charges and explanations of methodological purism, refer to debates
surrounding a series of mainly qualitative studies of the education of ethnic minority children in
England, which reported teacher racism at both organisational and classroom levels (Foster,
1990; Gillborn and Gipps, 1996; Hammersley, 1993; Troyna, 1994). Another example is the
rejection of what is termed as the preoccupation of quantitative researchers with technique, and
specifically their dismissal of any research that does not match the rigorous standards of the
quantitative method. The complaints of Mills about the fetishism of method (Mills, 1959: 224),
for instance, may fall into this category (Hammersley, 2000). What is needed, instead, Troyna
(1994: 5) argues, is a perspective in which research is not construed as something pristine but as
something "carried out by flesh and blood figures who are engaged in real life activities".
Critical realism, in particular through its novel ontological position, has the potential to advance
business theory and research. The major benefits of CR flow from the reinterpretation of the
activity of science (Ron, 2002: 140) which can then better explain previous research (see Befani,
2005; Pratschke, 2003; Ron, 2002). Indeed, a reinterpretation of the current practice of business
research arguably may resolve some long-standing research-practice inconsistencies. Based on
CR insights, we contest the notion of contradiction - what we term false dichotomy - of rigour
versus relevance in the field of business education. The separation of rigour from relevance may
be tantamount to adopting the presumption that rigour in research lacks relevance to real-world
management practices. Indeed, we consider it natural to expect gaps between research and
practice in any complex, diversified and specialised field. For example, in the field of work
psychology, Anderson (2007) identifies six prominent but not mutually exclusive types of
research: pure, fundamental, applied, action research, consultancy generated research and critical
Page 17
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 17/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 17
theory. Anderson argues that the existence of research-practice gaps are not the problem, but
rather the lack of integrating processes, bridges for information exchange and policy formulation
in both research and practice (p. 176). In other words, it is not actually the width of the gap that
schools and policy makers should pay attention to, but rather, the lack of sufficient bridging
mechanisms to span research and practice (Anderson, 2005).
Several scholars have used CR to support interdisciplinary research. For example, Danermark
(2002) discusses the useful manner in which CR may lay the foundations for interdisciplinary
research. A similar approach was taken by Bhaskar and Danermark (2006) in their study of
interdisciplinarity and disability research.
In the field of business education, scholars have highlighted the need to reinvent business
schools “geared to developing skills in reflective, collaborative and analytical thinking as well as
action mindsets that enable managers to negotiate the complex tensions that exist between the
conceptual and the concrete” (Starkey et al ., 2004: 1523). Eldridge (1986) suggests the need for
sound empirically based social science that is also seen as relevant, but there is a sting in the tail:
“In so far as this kind of approach attempts to understand organisations in order that managers
may more effectively control uncertainty, it may be regarded as highly relevant to management.
Yet the analysis takes place on the assumptions that the existing distribution of power remains
unchanged.” (p. 174). Similarly, Weick argues that:
The much lamented ‘relevance gap’ is as much a product of practitioners wedded togurus and fads as it is of academics wedded to abstractions and fundamentals. The gap
persists because practitioners forget that ‘the’ real world is actually ‘a’ world that isidiosyncratic, egocentric and unique to each person…[and]… fads and egocentric
perception suggests the existence of more fundamental barriers to effectiveness, e.g.,
Page 18
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 18/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 18
ceilings on improvement, weak situations, ambiguous signals, non-obvious adaptiveforms and preoccupation with vision. Joint practitioner-academic effort devoted toquestions of how events come to be seen as ‘real’ could re-bridge a gap whose nature has
been misidentified (Weick, 2001: S71).
This view is consistent with Eldridge's (1986) who distinguished between what he calls convivial
and critical relevance when he reviewed the development of some significant contributions to
management research. While recognising the practical usefulness of the research (on the impact
of technology on organisations), Eldridge recognises the extent to which research failed to treat
various aspects of managerial control as problematic:
It is perhaps the questions that are not asked… [and]… if we neglect to ask what a particular form of technology is designed to do, in whose interests and with whatconsequences, it does save a good deal of unpleasantness. If we do not inquire into thestructure of domination within which typologies of technology and control systems areembedded, then the critical relevance of the theory is diminished (Eldridge, 1986: 175).
From this perspective, the notion of relevance in management research can be seen as flawed.
Borrowing Eldridge's terminology, it is used or defined solely in the sense of 'congenially'
relevant to a partial group, community or their representatives, rather than 'critically' relevant
(Wensley, 2007).
Ethical Aspects of Management Research
The prevailing view within business schools is the utilitarian one (such as the one highlighted by
Skapinker (2008) in his critique of business research) that business education should be primarily
concerned with enhancing business and managerial effectiveness. This can be seen in the debate
about Mode 1 and Mode 2 research which takes this viewpoint for granted. However, there are
alternatives which see a role for management studies as one which holds current management
Page 19
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 19/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 19
practices at arms length in order to be able to subject them to appropriate scrutiny from the wider
perspective of the common social good. Grey and French (1996) and Grey (2001) contrast the
managerialist view with a critical view that business education must be dissociated from
managerial activities so that the claims and practices of management can be called into question.
Huff and Huff, in a response to Starkey and Madan’s paper, have advocated Mode 3 research:
“The purpose of Mode 3 knowledge production, generally stated, is to assure survival and
promote the common good, at various levels of social aggregation” (Huff and Huff, 2001: s53).
This seems particularly necessary at this point in time when there are major concerns about the
behaviour of corporations and its effects on society and the environment (Mingers, 2009):
• There have been significant breaches of legitimacy and trust (e.g., Enron, WorldCom);
human rights violations; and collaboration with repressive regimes (Palazzo and Scherer,
2006; Sethi, 2002);
• Globalisation means that some corporations are both economically and indeed politically
more powerful than many nation states (Beck, 2000); and
• Finally, and perhaps most significantly, the rather reluctant acceptance of the reality and
consequences of global warming has led even hardened executives to accept that they are
part of a problem that goes beyond short term stock valuation or even long term
shareholder wealth.
In the preceding sections, we have argued that a CR perspective would enable a pluralistic and
contextualised scholarship. To do so, however, would warrant a qualitatively different research
Page 20
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 20/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 20
orientation and a different model of research evaluation than the one offered by the Research
Assessment Exercise or the new metrics-based Research Excellence Framework in the UK.
Previous research has highlighted the need to establish a more democratically accountable form
of management research that is evaluated by those whose lives and professions in organisations
are directly affected in so many ways by management education (Alvesson and Wilmott, 1996).
This would involve focussing attention on managing as an activity that we all do in our personal
and occupational lives and how the knowledge produced in business schools is consumed in the
world of work. From this perspective, business research could aim to synthesise the often
competing demands of pragmatics, ethics and morality (Habermas, 1992, 1993).
However, the notion of democratic accountability of business education and research to public
and organisational well-being is a role which remains largely marginalised in the prevailing
conceptions of an increasingly commercialised business school. The demonstration of
‘relevance’ does not mean the pursuit of a narrow commercialisation agenda where business
institutes promote a strictly managerialist view of the world (Bridgman, 2007: 425). Encouraging
critical reflection in business schools and among business academics, Ali (2005: iii) argues, is
not only a scholarly responsibility but also a moral imperative. For example, one must also take
into account the institutional and contextual pressures which may be influencing the direction
and the outcomes of academic research. Academic scholars' mission and the essence of their very
existence are not merely to validate existing models and to mould their ideas into sanctioned
frameworks. Rather, the essence of scholarship is to be creative, ethical, and critically contest
boundaries that put a ceiling on ideas and possibilities.
Page 21
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 21/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 21
Research in epistemology as well as philosophy of science has shown why the classical
distinction between observation and theory, and between fact and value, cannot be maintained –
expressed in the two doctrines of modern philosophy of science, the theory-dependence of
observation and the under-determination of data by evidence. The ontological orientation of
personal knowing, while realised and enacted within a community, was understood long ago by
Polanyi to have precedence over the community: “The discipline required to regulate the
activities of scientists cannot be maintained by mere conformity to the actual demands of
scientific opinion, but requires the support of moral conviction, stemming from devotion to
science and prepared to operate independently of scientific opinion” (Polanyi, 1946: 54). It is
however a fact that even in formulating the problem of the affect, scholars are likely to pre-judge
it through a set of socio-cultural assumptions that indiscriminately lumps together all value
categories. Lewin (1991) argues that the positivists made this prejudice a virtue by seeking the
complete separation between fact and value, and though this demarcation has proved to be
untenable, the denigration of value categories continues to haunt scientific research.
In other words, one major challenge facing CR scholars is the identification and elucidation of
ethical aspects of their research: What triggers their research and what inhibits it? What are
short-term and long-term implications for organisations as well as for overall society? Is their
research socially and ethically legitimate? Are its effects publicly known and have they been
debated at adequate forums? If not, how could this situation be reformed?
Wilson and Greenhill (2004) take a non-Habermasian critical realist approach to develop a
radical critical stance. Their approach entails a commitment to emancipation, a focus on issues of
Page 22
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 22/34
Page 23
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 23/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 23
Discussion and Conclusion
We have argued in this paper that with its simultaneous critical attention to scholars' and
practitioners' preferences and constraints, CR may contribute to an improved understanding of
tensions between research and practice, a four pronged bridge between rigour and relevance
(Figure 1). Also, by implementing this perspective, several research-practice inconsistencies can
be addressed. Among other things, they may be treated as natural, such as those arising from
varied ethical or economic preferences of scholars and practitioners (Bhaskar, 2002). Despite
various tensions pertaining to the rigour versus relevance debate, business research remains
generally focused on and also constrained by the reality that research is trying to explain. As
some scholars suggest, we are all realists (Bhaskar, 1978; Latour, 1999). What CR can offer is a
richer social ontology that also takes into account the material/objective dimension of social
reality and a different epistemology (an alternative perspective on the nature/purpose of social
science).
In the context of business education, Starkey and colleagues (2004) argue that while business
schools in their current form stand criticised in terms of their research and teaching, let alone
their ethical standards, there are ways in which such schools can be reconfigured. In particular
they espouse a growing and influential role in developing knowledge. Alongside this, Starkey
and colleagues see it as essential that the business schools recognise its complicity in the new
forms of practice that are seen to have dysfunctional consequences in the wider society. Wensley
suggests that complicity, rather than espousal, may well be a fair charge, and that Starkey and
colleagues' analysis suggests a different but important role for business schools to engage with
the knowledge agenda of not only the university but also society overall (Wensley, 2007: 12).
Page 24
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 24/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 24
Figure 1. A critical realist bridge between rigour and relevance
Critical Realist Pers ective
B u s i n e s s
E d u c a t i o n a n
d R e s e a r c
h
( R i g o u r )
B
u s i n e s s
P r a c t i c e
( R e
l e v a n c e
)
Interdisciplinarity and Multimethodology
Contextuality and Causality
Methodological Rigidity
Ethical Aspects of Management Research
Do businesses ignore business schools? The issue Skapinker (2008) raised seems to be a
persistent challenge within the field of business research and education. Those in business
academe who are concerned with work on esoteric micro-concerns which are largely inaccessible
to business managers may consider the fact that there is much that can be done academically to
develop the knowledge of practice rather than mere knowledge itself. Sartof (2008) suggests that
businesses merely ignore what does not appear useful to them in practice. The development of an
understanding of epistemic practice requires, however, such 'backward-looking' analysis as
Harvard’s case study method. The challenge is therefore not for academe to struggle to forecast
what innovators will do next, and neither should business require that of academe. The challenge
is, rather, for academe to also develop knowledge about how others can arrive at their own new
Page 25
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 25/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 25
knowledge through practice. Managers also need to proceed from a body of knowledge and to
learn to build on it.
Indeed, efficient research and teaching is recognised worldwide as an important means of
spreading new knowledge and improving public good. As the quality of that public good
develops managers are forced to invent organisational practices which are more efficient than the
public good. In that way, research and teaching has the same function as a knowledge market.
Organisations can survive if they are better than what is readily available on the market. At the
same time, it will be ill-advised for academics to be entirely comfortable with the status quo. In
their attempt to bridge the false dichotomy of rigour versus relevance, scholars may like to
ensure that their research features problems that are of interest to managers, and that their
research has an explicit dependent variable that matters to managers, and independent variables
that are managerially actionable. Scholarly journals may also consider expanding their editorial
board memberships to also include practicing managers. With a relatively small shift in
incentives (e.g., tracking impact, rewarding the development of practice-oriented tools and
resources), and including relevance in promotion decisions, business schools may be able to
bridge the much publicised rigour-relevance gap.
References
Ackroyd, S. and Fleetwood, S. (2000) Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations.
London: Routledge.
Adler, P., Forbes, L. and Willmott, H. (2007) 'Critical Management Studies', Academy of
Management Annals 1: 119-179.
Page 26
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 26/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 26
Ali, A. (2005) 'Bad Management Theories: Mistaken Conclusion', Advances in Competitive
Research 13(1): i-iii.
Alvesson, M., and Wilmott, H. (1996) Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction.
London: Sage.
Anderson, N. (2005) 'Relationships between Practice and Research in Personnel Selection: Does
the Left Hand Know What the Right is Doing?', in A. Evers, N. Anderson, and O.
Voskuijl (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection (pp. 1–24). Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing.
Anderson, N. (2007) 'Rejoinder: The Practitioner–Researcher Divide Revisited: Strategic-level
Bridges and the Roles of IWO Psychologists', Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology 80: 175–183.
Anderson, N., Herriot, P. and Hodgkinson, G. (2001) 'The Practitioner-Researcher Divide in
Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) Psychology: Where Are We Now, and Where
Do We Go from Here?', Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74:
391-411.
Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds) (1998) Critical Realism:
Essential Readings. London: Routledge.
Beck, U. (2000) What is Globalization ? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Befani, B. (2005) 'The Mechanisms of Suicide: A Realist Approach', International Review of
Sociology 15 (1): 51-75.
Bhaskar, R. (1978) A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
Page 27
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 27/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 27
Bhaskar, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism . Sussex: Harvester Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1993) Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom . London: Verso.
Bhaskar, R. (1994) Plato, etc: The Problems of Philosophy and Their Resolution . London:
Verso.
Bhaskar, R. (1998) 'Philosophy and Scientific Realism', in M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T.
Lawson and A. Norrie (eds), Critical Realism: Essential Readings (pp. 16-47). London:
Routledge.
Bhaskar, R. (2002) From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of
Enlightenment . Delhi: Sage.
Bhaskar, R. and Danermark, B. (2006) Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability research: A
Critical Realist Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(4): 287-297.
Bridgman, T. (2007) 'Reconstituting Relevance: Exploring Possibilities for Management
Educators’ Critical Engagement with the Public', Management Learning 38(4): 425–439.
Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2003) Business Research Methods. Oxford: OUP.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis .
London: Heinemann.
Danermark, B. (2002) 'Interdisciplinary Research and Critical Realism: The Example of
Disability Research', Journal of Critical Realism 5(1): 56-64.
Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L. and Karlsson, J. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical
Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
Dobson, P. J. (2002) 'Critical Realism and Information Systems Research: Why Bother with
Philosophy', Information Research 7 (2).
Page 28
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 28/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 28
Eldridge, J. (1986) 'Facets of ‘Relevance’ in Sociological Research', in F.A. Heller (ed.) The use
and Abuse of Social Science . London: Sage.
Fleetwood, S. (ed.) (1999) Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate . Routledge:
London.
Foster, P. (1990) Policy and Practice in Multicultural and Anti-racist Education . London:
Routledge
Gelade, G. A. (2006) 'But What Does It Mean in Practice? The Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology from a Practitioner Perspective', Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology 79: 153–160.
Ghoshal, S. (2005) 'Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices',
Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 75-91.
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. (1996) 'Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory',
Academy of Management Review 21(1): 13-47.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, L., Nowotny, H., Schwartman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The
New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary
Societies . London: Sage.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gillborn, D. and Gipps, C. (1996) Recent Research on the Achievements of Ethnic Minority
Pupils. London: HMSO.
Gioia, D. A. (2002) 'Business Education's Role in the Crisis of Confidence in Corporations',
Academy of Management Executive 16(3): 142-144.
Grey, C. (2001) 'Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan', British Journal of
Management 12: s27-s32.
Page 29
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 29/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 29
Grey, C. and French, R. (1996) 'Rethinking Management Education: An Introduction', in R.
French and C. Grey (eds) Rethinking Management Education . London: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1992) 'Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Programme of Philosophical Justification', in
J. Habermas (ed.) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , pp.43-115.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1993) 'On the Pragmatic, the Ethical, and the Moral Employments of Practical
Reason', in J. Habermas (ed.) Justification and Application , pp.1-17. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Hammersley, M. (1993) 'On Methodological Purism: A Response to Barry Troyna', British
Educational Research Journal 19 (4): 339-341.
Hammersley, M. (2000) 'Methodological Purism: Anatomy of a Critique', in Hammersley, M.
(ed.) Taking sides in social research: Essays on Partisanship and Bias , 124-150. New
York: Routledge.
Huff, A. S. and Huff, J. (2001) 'Re-focusing the Business School Agenda', British Journal of
Management 12: S49-S54.
Joseph, J. (2002) Hegemony: A Realist Analysis . New York: Routledge
Klein, P. (2008) 'Why Business Ignores the Business Schools', Organizations and Markets .
Available at: http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/01/10/why-business-ignores-the-
business-schools/, Accessed 25 February 2008.
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1997) 'The Hype and Hope of Interdisciplinary Management
Studies', British Journal of Management 8: 9-22 .
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora's Hope . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Page 30
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 30/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 30
Learmonth, M. (2007) 'Critical Management Education in Action: Personal Tales of
Management Unlearning', Academy of Management Learning and Education 6(1): 109-
113.
Lewin, P. (1991) 'The Problem of Objectivity in Post-critical Philosophy', Tradition and
Discovery 17(1): 18-26.
Lipscomb, M. (2008) 'Mixed Method Nursing Studies: A Critical Realist Critique', Nursing
Philosophy 9(1): 32-45.
Maton, K. (2001) 'The Real and Critical Need of Educational Research for Critical Realism', The
Journal of Critical Realism May: 56-59.
McEvoy, P. and Richards, D. (2003) 'Critical Realism: A Way Forward for Evaluation Research
in Nursing?', Journal of Advanced Nursing 43(4): 411-420.
Mills, C. W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination . New York: Oxford University Press.
Mingers, J. (2000) 'What is it to be Critical? Teaching a Critical Approach to Management
Undergraduates', Management Learning 31: 219-237.
Mingers, J. (2003) 'The Paucity of Multimethod Research: A Survey of the IS Literature',
Information Systems Journal 13: 233-249.
Mingers, J. (2004a) 'Re-establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems', in J.
Mingers and L. P. Willcocks (eds), Social Theory and Philosophy for Information
Systems (pp. 372-406). Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Mingers, J. (2004b) 'Can Social Systems be Autopoietic? Bhaskar's and Giddens' Social
Theories', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(4): 403-426.
Mingers, J. (2004c) 'Paradigm Wars: Ceasefire Announced, Who Will Set Up the New
Administration?', Journal of Information Technology 19: 165-171.
Page 31
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 31/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 31
Mingers, J. (2009) 'Discourse Ethics and Critical Realist Ethics: An Evaluation in the Context of
Business Ethics', Journal of Critical Realism, forthcoming.
Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (eds) (1997) Multimethodology: Theory and Practice of Combining
Management Science Methodologies . Wiley: Chichester.
Modell, S. (2007) 'Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Management
Accounting Research: A Critical Realist Approach', 29 June 2007. Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=997194, Accessed 2 March 2008.
Morgan, G. (ed.) (1983). Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research . Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public
in an Age of Uncertainty . Cambridge: Polity Press.
Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A. (2006) 'Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative
Framework', Journal of Business Ethics 66: 71-88.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation . London: Sage.
Pettigrew A. M. (1997a) 'The Double Hurdles for Management Research', in T. Clarke (ed.)
Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D. S. Pugh , pp.277-296.
London: Dartmouth Press.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997b) 'What is a Processual Analysis?', Scandinavian Journal of
Management 13(4): 337-348.
Pettigrew, A. (2001) 'The Double Hurdles for Management Research', in Clarke, T. (ed.)
Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D. S. Pugh . London:
Dartmouth Press, pp. 277-296.
Polanyi, M. (1946) Science, Faith and Society . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Page 32
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 32/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 32
Porter, S. and Ryan, S. (1996) 'Breaking the Boundaries between Nursing and Sociology: A
Critical Realist Ethnography of the Research-Practice Gap', Journal of Advanced Nursing
24(2): 413-420.
Pratschke, J. (2003) 'Realistic Models? Critical Realism and Statistical Models in the Social
Sciences', Philosophica 71: 13-38.
Reed, J. (2000) 'Citigroup's John Reed and Stanford's James March on Management Research
and Practice', Academy of Management Executive 14: 52-64.
Reed, M. (2005) 'Reflections on the "Realist Turn" in Organization and Management Studies',
Journal of Management Studies 42(8): 1621-1644.
Ron, A. (2002) 'Regression Analysis and the Philosophy of Social Science', Journal of Critical
Realism 1(1): 119-142.
Sartof, D. (2008) 'Does Business Ignore the Business Schools?', Available at:
http://davidsartof.blogspot.com/2008/01/does-business-ignore-business-schools.html,
Accessed 20 February 2008.
Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science . London: Sage.
Scott, D. (2000) Realism and Educational Research: New Perspectives and Possibilities .
London: Routledge.
Sethi, S. (2002) 'Standards for Corporate Conduct in the International Arena: Challenges and
Opportunities for Multinational Corporations', Business and Society Review 107(1): 20-
40 .
Skapinker, M. (2008) 'Why Business Ignores the Business Schools', Financial Times 8 January.
Smith, M. L. (2006) 'Overcoming Research-Practice Inconsistencies: Critical Realism and
Information Systems Research', Information and Organization 16(3): 191-211.
Page 33
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 33/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 33
Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001) 'Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the
Future of Management Research', British Journal of Management 12: S3-26.
Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A. and Tempest, S. (2004) 'Rethinking the Business School', Journal of
Management Studies 41(8): 1521-1531.
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in social and Behavioural
Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Troyna, B. (1994) 'Reforms, Research and Being Reflexive about Being Reflective', in D. Halpin
and B. Troyna (eds) Researching Education Policy: Ethical and Methodological Issues .
London: Falmer.
Weick, K. E. (2001) 'Gapping the Relevance Bridge: Fashions Meet Fundamentals in
Management Research', British Journal of Management 12: S71-S75.
Wensley, R. (2007) 'Beyond Rigour and Relevance: The Underlying Nature of Both Business
Schools and Management Research', AIM Research Working Paper Series : 051-January-
2007.
Wilson, M. and Greenhill, A. G. (2004) 'Theory and Action for Emancipation: Elements of a
Critical Realist Approach', in B. Kaplan, D. Truex, D. Wastell and T. Woodharper (eds),
Relevant Theory and Informed Practice , pp. 667-674. Boston: Kluwer.
Page 34
8/13/2019 Beyond Rigour n Relevance_a CR Approach to Biz Educatn_Mingers
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/beyond-rigour-n-relevancea-cr-approach-to-biz-educatnmingers 34/34
Beyond Rigour and Relevance 34