Top Banner

of 33

Best Management Practices for Pollen Substitute Application for Honey Bee Colonies

Nov 04, 2015

Download

Documents

Moryal

Study testing various pollen substitutes against one another in various Apis Meliffera colonies
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Best Management Practices for Pollen Substitute Application for

    Pollination Colonies

    Les Eccles

    OBA Tech-Transfer Program

  • Importance of Pollination to Ontario Beekeeping

    Pollination in Eastern Can 14700 Colonies in 2011

    17% increase from 2010

    26000 Colonies in 2012 77% increase from 2011

    24400 Colonies in 2013 New Brunswick

    12-13 million pounds $7.2-7.8 million

  • Added Opportunities = Added Challenge

    Nutrient Deficiencies

    Transportation

    Pest and Disease

    Population maintenance

    Overwintering

  • Causes of Protein Deficiency

    Low or poor quality pollen

    Increased activity over pollen requirements i.e. high nectar flow with poor pollen

    Pollen too far away

    Varroa effects protein storage Poor overwintering

  • Effects of Protein Deficiency

    Halt to brood rearing Consume eggs and larva Premature capping of pupa

    Increased risk of EFB Lower or poor quality supercedure Decreased foraging behaviour Poor overwintering

  • 2012 Nutritional Study

    Apply 3 quantities of pollen (Global Patties) 2 lbs. low 3 lbs. mid 5 lbs. high Study optimal amount

    Upon return from pollination Colony Strength (Bees and brood) Disease profile Food stores (honey and pollen)

    Cost Analysis

  • Effect of Feeding on Bee Population July 2012

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Cell M

    ean

    Nill Two Three FiveCell

  • Effect of feeding/Pollination on Varroa Infestation

    0

    .5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    Cell M

    ean

    Fed Not FedCell

    Interaction Bar Plot for % Varroa Su Effect: Fed Error Bars: 1 Standard Error(s)

  • Effect of Feeding/Pollination on Nosema

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    Cell M

    ean

    Fed Not FedCell

    8 cases were omitted due to missing values.

    Interaction Bar Plot for Spores/bee Su Effect: Fed Split By: NosemaD Cell: Positive Error Bars: 1 Standard Error(s)

  • Pollen Substitute Results

    No difference 2, 3 and 5 lbs Brood Frames of Bees Food Stores

    Colony Health Increase EFB Increase Nosema compared to non pollination Decreased Varroa compared to non pollination Missing eggs and larva

  • What is going on??

    Quantity of Pollen?

    Quality of Pollen?

    Disease build up in Comb?

    Management of EFB

    Recovery conditions before overwintering

  • 2013 Pollen Substitute Types

    Bee Pro 15% $1.20

    Global Patties 15% $1.20

  • Home Made Substitute

    Parts Quantity Ingredient Specs Price

    8 100 lbs. Granulated Sugar $38.00

    2 25 lbs. Brewers Yeast 48% protein $39.25

    1 12 lbs. Dried Whole Egg 47-48% protein $26.40

    5 litres Water

    3 cups Veg Oil $01.75

    3 cups Lemon Juice $01.25

    Total 150 lbs. 11.2% $106.65

  • 2013 Project Set up and Evaluation

    Application rate for each substitute type Control (no substitute) 3 lbs. 5 lbs.

    Assessment 180 colonies Frame by frame

    Honey, pollen, brood, bees Disease presence (chalkbrood, sacbrood etc)

    Weight (food stores Varroa, nosema and tracheal mites

  • 00.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    C HM BP GL

    Effect of substitute type on frames of bees after pollination

    b

    a

    b

    b

  • 00.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    HM BP GL

    3lbs

    5lbs

    Effect of substitute amountson frames of bees

    a

    bb

    b

    ba

  • 00.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    C HM BP GL

    Effect of substitute type on brood after pollination

    ab

    a

    bb

  • Effect of substitute application rate on stored Pollen

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    HM BP GL

    3 lbs

    5 lbs

    aa

    b

    a

    a

    a

  • 01

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    C HM BP GL

    Effect of Substitute type on Population Build up for Winter

    aab bc c

  • Home Made Substitute $0.71/lb

    Parts Quantity Ingredient Specs Price

    8 100 lbs. Granulated Sugar $38.00

    2 25 lbs. Brewers Yeast 48% protein $39.25

    1 12 lbs. Dried Whole Egg 47-48% protein $26.40

    5 litres Water

    3 cups Veg Oil $01.75

    3 cups Lemon Juice $01.25

    Total 150 lbs. 11.2% $106.65

  • Benefits of Home Made Substitute

    Higher immediate consumption

    Improved brood and bee populations after pollination

    Improved build up to winter time

    Cost approx. $2.10 per colony compare to approx. $3.60 per colony (BP and GL)

  • Pollination vs. Non-pollination

    -

    500,000

    1,000,000

    1,500,000

    2,000,000

    2,500,000

    3,000,000

    Spring Summer Fall

    Average Nosema spores per bee

    Pollination colonies

    Non-pollination colonies

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    18.00

    Spring Summer Fall

    Average Varroa per 100 Bees

    Nosema control may be an especially big concern for beekeepers who provide pollination services

  • 02

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    spring summer* fall*

    Var

    roa

    mit

    es/1

    00 b

    ees

    2012 Varroa levels for 2013 live vs. dead colonies

    live

    dead

    Virulence Winter mortality

    A much stronger relationship exists between Varroa levels and winter mortality

  • IPM for Pollination Service

    Varroa Decreased reproduction rates in pollination Resulting in decreased winter mortality

    Will this change if improved management increases brood production?

  • Percentage of bees positive for Nosema infection by season in 2012 and 2013 in Southern Ontario.

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Sp12 Su12 Fa12 Sp13

    Seasonality proportion of infected bees

  • Frames of Bees

    Frames of Brood

    Frames of Honey

    Low Nosema 10.11 4.38 7.84High Nosema 8.13 3.16 4.84Difference 1.98 1.22 3.00Value/frame $ 12.00 $ 18.00 $ 8.00 Lost value $ 23.72 $ 21.95 $ 23.97

    Total $ 69.65

    Virulence Economic cost

  • Current Control

    0

    500000

    1000000

    1500000

    2000000

    2500000

    spring* summer* fall

    Nos

    ema

    spor

    es/b

    ee

    Effect of spring Fumagillin treatment on Nosema levels in 2012

    pollination colonies

    not treated

    treated

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    1600000

    1800000

    spring* summer fall

    Nos

    ema

    spor

    es/b

    ee

    Effect of spring fumagillin treatment on Nosema levels in 2013 pollination

    colonies

    not treated

    treated

  • IPM for Pollination Service

    Nosema increased concern for pollination colonies

    Significant economic impact

    Treatments and application methods need to be improved

  • Best Management For Pollination

    Pollen substitutes should be tested in field just like pest control produces

    Other stresses could greatly improve colony conditions Transportation Management will in pollination

    Nosema requires improved management

  • Acknowledgements

    Dr Ernesto Guzmans lab:

    Dr. Guzman, Paul Kelly, Mollah Md. Hamiduzzaman, Hailey Ashbee, Berna Emsen, Jessica Gu, Dan Borges, Esther Uribe

    Tech Transfer Program:

    Les Eccles, Devan Rawn, Melanie Kempers, Raquel Mijares,

    Natalie Talbot, Sarah DAndrea, Kinnison Ma, Daniel Thurston

    2012 Nutritional StudyHome Made SubstituteSlide Number 142013 Project Set up and EvaluationSlide Number 19Slide Number 20Effect of substitute application rate on stored PollenSlide Number 22Home Made Substitute $0.71/lbPollination vs. Non-pollinationCurrent Control