LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 2015 DELIVERABLES AND BEYOND 12 February 2015 3:00pm – 4:00pm (CET)
LIVE WEBCAST UPDATE ON BEPS PROJECT 2015 DELIVERABLES AND BEYOND
12 February 2015 3:00pm – 4:00pm (CET)
INTRODUCTION
Pascal Saint-Amans Director, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration
Raffaele Russo Head, BEPS Project
Achim Pross Head, International Cooperation and Tax Administration
Marlies de Ruiter Head, Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions
Piet Battiau Head, Consumption Taxes Unit
Speakers
3
Ask questions and comment throughout the webcast
Join the discussion
Directly: Enter your question in the space provided Via email: [email protected] Via Twitter: Follow us on @OECDlive using #BEPS
4
PROGRESS REPORTED TO THE G20 FINANCE MINISTERS 9-10 FEBRUARY 2015
1. Implementation guidance for TP Documentation and CBC Reporting 2. Mandate of the development of Multilateral Instrument 3. Patent Boxes and Harmful Tax Practices
Agreement reported in 3 Key Areas of BEPS Project
Communiqué, G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors 11. We reiterate our full support to the G20/OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project, showing our resolve to tackle cross-border tax avoidance by modernizing international tax rules. We will finalize the deliverables under the BEPS Action Plan by year-end. We endorse the mandate to develop a multilateral instrument to streamline the implementation of the tax treaty-related BEPS measures. [...] We welcome the direct engagement of developing countries in the BEPS Project ensuring that their concerns are addressed and acknowledge that their timing of application may differ from other countries. We will closely monitor progress in preparation of toolkits to assist developing countries in implementing the BEPS actions. We will continue to support developing countries in strengthening their capacity. […] (Istanbul, 9-10 February)
6
CBC AND TP DOCUMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
Background
New transfer pricing documentation guidance was published in September 2014 and presented to the G20 Finance Ministers at their September 2014 meeting and to G20 Leaders at their November 2014 meeting. Includes three types of documents:
Master file containing standardised background information regarding the MNE group.
Local file analysing specific transfer pricing compliance for material transactions of the local taxpayer.
Country-by-Country (CbC) report containing specific information relating to the global allocation of the MNE’s income, taxes paid and certain indicators of the geographic location of economic activity within the MNE group. 8
Guidance on: • Timing of preparation and filing of CbC
report • Which MNEs are covered by CbC reporting • Conditions underpinning use of CbC reports
Implementation package to be developed by April 2015 for the
use of government-to government mechanisms for automatic
exchange of CbC reports
CbC and TP documentation implementation guidance
Master file and Local file will be filed locally >> countries agree on the need to take consistency and confidentiality into account when
developing local legislation
9
Automatic exchange by the jurisdiction where the ultimate parent company is resident
Competent authority agreement(s)
Use of existing legal instruments for EoI as a basis of the Competent authority agreement(s)
Secondary mechanisms recognised as legitimate only in a few cases
Monitoring. Outcomes monitoring taken into account in review in 2020
GtG mechanism for exchange of the CbC report
10
HARMFUL TAX PRACTICES
Overview
12
Sep. 2014 Sep. 2015 Dec. 2015
Revamp work of FHTP with a focus on:
• Requiring substantial activity for all preferential regimes
• Transparency and compulsory exchange of information on rulings on preferential regimes
• Review of member and associate regimes
Strategy to expand participation to non-members
Consider revision to existing criteria
12
Two main areas of focus: 1. Substantial activities 2. Transparency
Current work
13
HTP and patent boxes
• No consensus in the 2014 progress report but compromise proposal from Germany and the UK maintaining the principle of the nexus approach with some modifications
• Nexus approach now been agreed – agreement released on
6 February 2015
• Action 5 requires substantial activities in preferential regimes – initially focused on requiring substantial activities in IP regimes (patent boxes)
14
• Taxpayers receive benefits proportionate to the qualifying R&D expenditures that they themselves incurred
• Agreed approach increases qualifying expenditures by 30% in certain circumstances.
• It also sets dates for closure of existing regimes – 30 June 2016: existing IP regimes closed to new entrants – 30 June 2021: after this date taxpayers in existing regimes can
no longer qualify for benefits
Nexus approach • Requires a nexus between the qualifying expenditures incurred by
the taxpayer and the income receiving benefits
15
Next steps for substantial activities
Ongoing work on implementation of nexus approach and application to IP regimes: • Details of tracking and tracing of expenditure • Additional Safeguards re transitional provisions • Further guidance on definition of qualifying IP asset To be completed within next 6 months FHTP must also determine how to require substantial activities in preferential regimes that are not IP regimes
16
Transparency
Other priority in Action 5 is transparency • Framework on compulsory spontaneous
exchange of rulings on preferential regimes agreed
• Further work will consider: • The exact scope of exchange of rulings • Whether rulings regimes themselves are preferential • Guidance on best practice in respect of rulings
17
• Finalise review of regimes of OECD and G20 countries • Develop strategy for engaging with non G20/non-OECD
members • Consider revision of existing criteria for assessing
preferential regimes • To be included in the 2015 progress report
Other BEPS work on harmful tax practices
18
MANDATE FOR A MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT
• September 2014: Report concluded that a multilateral instrument is feasible and desirable.
• January 2015: CFA approved a draft mandate for the negotiation of a multilateral instrument.
Mandate for a multilateral instrument
20
• Scope: Limited to modifying existing DTT to implement treaty-related measures developed. Candidates: – provisions on hybrid entities (Action 2) – Provisions on treaty abuse (Action 6) – Artificial avoidance of the PE (Action 7) – Dispute resolution (Action 14) – Other possible changes (Actions 8-10, etc.)
Mandate for a multilateral instrument: What
21
• Body: Ad hoc non-permanent Group convened under the aegis of the OECD and the G20.
• Participation: Open to all interested States, who participate on an equal footing. Jurisdictions, regional and international organisations can join as Observers.
• Timeline: Finalise work and open instrument for signature by December 2016.
Mandate for a multilateral instrument: Who and When
22
INVOLVEMENT OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
New structured dialogue process launched in November 2014
1. Direct participation in the Committee on Fiscal Affairs
and its subsidiary
bodies
2. Regional Networks of
tax policy and administration
officials
3. Capacity building support
24
Upcoming Regional Network meetings
– Asia and Pacific Region: Seoul, 12 – 13 February 2015 – Latin America and the Caribbean: Lima, 26-27 February 2015, in
partnership with CIAT – French-speaking countries: Gabon, 27 February 2015, in partnership
with CREDAF – Eurasia: Ankara, 4 - 5 March 2015, in partnership with Turkey – Africa: Pretoria, 20 – 21 April 2015, in partnership with ATAF (African
Tax Administration Forum)
Also open to business and civil society for input
25
RECENT DISCUSSION DRAFTS
Overview Action Title Published Deadline
7 Prevent the artificial avoidance of PE Status 31 October 2014 9 January 2015
10 Transfer Pricing: Low value-adding services 3 November 2014 14 January 2015
6 Prevent treaty abuse (follow-up work) 21 November 2014 9 January 2015
10 Transfer Pricing: Profit splits 16 December 2014 6 February 2015
10 Transfer Pricing: Commodity transactions 16 December 2014 6 February 2015
4 Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments
18 December 2014 6 February 2015
14 Make Dispute Resolution mechanisms more effective
18 December 2014 16 January 2015
1 VAT B2C Guidelines 18 December 2014 20 February 2015
8-10 Transfer Pricing: Risk, recharacterisation 19 December 2014 6 February 2015
Complete details: www.oecd.org/tax/previous-requests-for-input.htm
DISCUSSION DRAFT ON REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES (INCLUDING RISK, RECHARACTERISATION, AND SPECIAL MEASURES)
Risks and capital
ensure that inappropriate returns will not accrue to an entity solely because it has contractually assumed
risks or has provided capital
clarify the circumstances in which transactions can be recharacterised
Actions 8, 9, 10: Assure that TP outcomes are in line with value creation
29
Part I Proposed revision to Section D of Chapter
I, including new wording on functional analysis, risks and non-recognition (new
terminology for re-characterisation)
Part II Options for some draft special measures
Revisions to Chapter I of the TP guidelines
30
What do the proposals achieve?
The potential for misalignment of profits and value creation may arise from misalignment of form and substance, and in particular exclusive reliance on mere contractual ownership, mere contractual assumption of risk and provision of capital.
31
Revisions to Chapter I set out an analytical framework for:
Key first step of any TP analysis : accurately delineating the actual
transaction
Second step of the TP analysis: pricing the accurately delineated
actual transaction by finding comparables and choosing a TP
method
How to determine the ‘real deal’?
32
Looking at the written contracts
Carefully assess the conduct of the parties in the context of their commercial and financial relations
If the conduct of the parties contradicts or supplements the written contracts: the conduct of the parties is used to supplement or replace
the written contractual arrangements when delineating the actual transaction undertaken
How is the actual transaction delineated?
33
Risks should be identified with specificity
The role of these risk in the specific business
environment involved needs to be assessed
It needs to be assured that valuable risk management
activities are rewarded appropriately and that a risk can only be allocated to a party that controls the risk
Additional guidance on risks
34
Business reality is priced, not paper reality
Flexing the muscles of the arm’s length principle, making it work harder
Agreement on the directions taken, resulting in more
alignment in the approaches of countries
Illustrates that TP is not an exact science and is heavily reliant on facts. As a result
there is a high risk of unilateral adjustments
leading to double taxation. Effective dispute resolution
mechanisms are key.
35
What does the new guidance achieve?
Capability to make decisions to take on the risk and
Capability to make decisions on whether and how to manage the risk
including the actual performance of the decision-making functions and the functions related to assessing, monitoring and directing the outsourced measures
Where a decision is made to outsource risk mitigation, control of the risk would require capability to assess, monitor and direct the outsourced measures that affect risk outcomes
What is control over risk?
36
Delineating the actual transaction is NOT
non –recognition or re-characterisation, but is aligning the form and the substance (factual
substance)
Non-recognition comes in when the
transaction has been accurately delineated,
but does not make commercial sense
because the transaction does not provide each of the parties involved with
the possibility to protect or enhance
their commercial and financial positions
(economic substance)
Non-recognition will only occur in (very)
exceptional circumstances
Non-recognition (previously re-characterisation)
37
New guidance makes the arm’s length principle work harder, but may not prevent all BEPS risks.
Remaining risks mainly relate to information asymmetries and the allocation of capital to lowly-taxed minimal functional entities.
Part II of the DD outlines some potential special measures that could be considered as a basis to address these concerns.
Close interaction with other actions, including Action 3 on CFC rules and Action 4 on Interest deductibility.
Do BEPS risks remain?
38
Finalisation Actions 8/9/10 in September 2015 and Action 4 in December 2015
Public consultation meeting early July 2015
Discussion draft on CCA’s, intangibles, profit splits and financial transactions to be released between April-June
Public consultation meeting 19/20 March 2015
Deadline for comments was February 6th. 862 pages of comments received
Follow up steps
39
Late Oct 2014
Dec 2014
Mar 2015
Early Apr 2015
Early Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Sep 2015
Low value-adding services DD PC RD Finalisation: changes to TPG Ch VII
Risk, recharacterisation DD PC RD Finalisation: changes to Ch I, IX
Commodity transactions DD
PC RD Finalisation: changes to Ch II
Profit splits DD PC RD PC Finalisation: changes to Ch II
Cost contribution arrangements (CCAs)
DD PC Finalisation: changes to Ch VIII
Intangibles: RD 2014 report plus DD hard to value intangibles
RD DD PC Finalisation: changes to Ch VI
Financial transactions DD PC (Finalisation: December 2015)
Planned timetable on TP Actions
DD = discussion draft RD = revised drafts PC = public consultation 40
INTERNATIONAL VAT/GST GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES ON PLACE OF TAXATION FOR BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER SUPPLIES OF SERVICES AND INTANGIBLES
International VAT/GST Guidelines B2C supplies of services and intangibles
Public consultation on 25 February 2015
• VAT payable in jurisdiction where customer has its usual residence
• Remote supplier to register and remit VAT in customer’s jurisdiction
• Simplified registration and compliance regime for remote suppliers – Obligations limited to what is required to collect/remit VAT
• International administrative cooperation in VAT to be strengthened, to support the effective collection of VAT from remote suppliers
Discussion draft released on 18 December 2014
42
MAKE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS MORE EFFECTIVE
Released on 18 December 2014
413 pages of public comments were received
Public consultation held on 23 January 2015
The discussion draft, comments received and webcast of the public consultation meeting are available on the OECD web site: ww.oecd.org/tax
Action 14 Discussion Draft
44
NEXT STEPS
• Action 11 (Late March 2015) • Action 12 (Late March 2015) • Action 3 (Early April 2015) • Actions 8-10 – Intangibles, Hard to Value
Intangibles, and Cost Contribution Arrangements (Early April 2015)
Upcoming Discussion Drafts
46
• Action 4 (17 February 2015) • VAT/GST Guidelines on B2C trade in services
and intangibles (25 February 2015) • Actions 8-10 (19-20 March 2015) • Action 11 (13 May 2015)
Upcoming Public Consultations
47
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Ask questions and comment
Join the discussion
Directly: Enter your question in the space provided Via email: [email protected] Via Twitter: Follow us via @OECDlive using #BEPS
49
Further Information
Website: www.oecd.org/tax/beps.htm Contact: [email protected] Tax email alerts: www.oecd.org/oecddirect