Page 1
1
BENUE STATE UNIVERSITY, MAKURDI
POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
DEPARTMENT OF MASS COMMUNICATION
COURSE TITLE: BROADCAST SEMINAR
COURSE CODE: COM 702
TOPIC:
Terrorism and The Mass Media in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic: Trends,
Challenges and the way forward
BY
IDYOROUGH, SOLATA MDEI----------BSU/MAC/M.SC/12/6437
COURSE LECTURER: KOMBOL, M. A. Ph.D.
FEBRUARY 2014
Page 2
2
ABSTRACT
This paper “Terrorism and the Mass Media in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic: Trends,
Challenges and the way forward” discusses how the media wants dramatic, shocking,
disconcerting news that keeps readers, listeners, and viewers captivated, that which
bolsters the circulation of the print press and the ratings of the electronic media.
Terrorists on the other hand need to spread their propaganda to further their
ultimate political objectives. With each having its objective, the news media and
terrorists now, are not involved in a love story; rather they are strange bedfellows in a
marriage of convenience. This work focuses on traditional media (radio, television and
newspapers) and has excluded the internet; the world wide system of interconnected
networks, using the telecommunications infrastructure, that now supports a large number
of types of computer based communication exchanges including consultation of data-
bases, websites and homepages, conversational interactions, e-mail e.t.c this is so
because the internet may seem to be taking over many functions of ‘traditional’ mass
media but access to the internet is still restricted by cost to the user, plus barriers of
language, culture and computer literacy. The paper recommends that to divest
terrorism of religious coloration is through well packaged information and
mass education especially through the media about the subject with particular
attention being focused on the fact that no known religion endorses
terrorism overtly or tacitly.
Key words: Terrorism, mass media, Nigeria’s Fourth Republic
Page 3
3
INTRODUCTION
The mass media has shriveled the distance in the world, turning it into a global village in the
sense that we easily have access to information of things happening around the globe just as such
events are occurring due to the functional role of the mass media in the provision of adequate
information about ongoing or current events in society as a way of serving the public need to
know. The news media, in particular, serve this basic human needs by providing information on
what, who, why and where of a particular event, which the media consider worthy of relaying to
the public. Indeed, it is possible to argue that there is no particular time the public is more in
need of information from the media than when the safety, or even the survival, of the public is
threatened. In the last decade we have been flooded with news from and about the
Global War on Terror. The attention of the world was drawn to Nigeria when a 23 year old
Nigerian Farouk Abdulmuttalab attempted to bomb an airline in the United States of America
December 2009. Nigeria was then looked upon as one of the “terrorist nations” by America and
some other nations. Though Nigeria’s name was later removed from the list of terrorist nations
after strong diplomatic meetings, the facts at our hands now with Boko Haram (Islamic religious
sect) series of bombings have put back Nigeria’s name of terrorist nations.
The emphasis generally has been on the perpetrators of acts of terrorism and the fight
against them. Terrorists have learned to
make good use of mass media; they use it for political manipulation. In recent years,
character of the news on the one hand a public good and on the other a commercial
commodity has shifted more and more towards the commodity side with the result that
we get more “info‐tainment” and “info-horror shows”.
Both grab the attention of the public and create greater audiences, offering more
opportunities for commercial advertisements to be sold to a news‐hungry public. Marshall
McLuhan, one of the most celebrated researchers on the social impact of the mass media, came
to the relatively precocious conclusion that “without Communication terrorism would not
exist.” Torres Soriano (2008) also agreed that this short sentence holds a truth that has remained
unchanged during the last decades. It is not uncommon to cite the relationship between the
diffusion of terrorist messages and the existence of modern mass media. Terrorism,
however, did widely exist before the mass media did.
Page 4
4
Keghku and Edema (2012) opined that Over the years, across the states of Nigeria, there had
been uproars, restiveness, clashes between communities, killings, abductions, bombing, among
too numerous sorts of societal assaults and criminal activities as they may be described by the
generality of the people in relation to what the laws of the land can accommodate. Whereas, to
the perpetrators, these are normal activities that can help in the pursuance and achievement of
some personal desirability and aggrandizements, and get repositioned in the society. This work
focuses on traditional media (radio, television and newspapers) and has excluded the internet; the
world wide system of interconnected networks, using the telecommunications infrastructure, that
now supports a large number of types of computer based communication exchanges including
consultation of data-bases, websites and homepages, conversational interactions, e-mail e.t.c this
is so because the internet may seem to be taking over many functions of ‘traditional’ mass media
but access to the internet is still restricted by cost to the user, plus barriers of language, culture
and computer literacy. We need to ask ourselves if there is a symbiotic relationship between
terrorism and the media. What kinds of relationships exist between terrorist groups and the
media? We shall also see how publicity benefits terrorists, and how the media benefits from the
acts of terrorists. The present paper will attempt to answer these questions.
CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION
TERRORISM
Terrorism is from the word 'terror' which conjures the image of fear and trepidation. It is
an act intended to instill fear and submission in the targeted victim(s). It is usually
unprovoked, random and unpredictable while its commonest form is bombing. It could
also take the form of hijacking of commercial aircraft, kidnapping, assassination, gun attack,
arson and frontal assaults on important state institutions. When does a certain act of violence
meet the definition of terrorism? To provide an answer to this question, we need to draw a clear
distinction between a “common” criminal and a terrorist (Nacos, 2002). The simplest way to
understand the difference is that common criminals do not engage in illegal activities in order to
make a political statement, while this is precisely what terrorists do. In order to assure that their
Page 5
5
intended “statement” reaches as wide an audience as possible, terrorists often use violence to
attract the attention of the media (Nacos, 2002).
According to the United Nations General Assembly:
“Terrorism can be seen as criminal acts intended or calculated to
provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons
or particular persons for political purposes whatever the
considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial,
ethnic, religious or other nature that may be invoked to justify
them” (as quoted by Koh 2002: 148).
Sambe (2014) defined terrorism as:
The use of violent action in order to achieve political aim or to
force the government to act. It is also all criminal acts directed
against a state and intended or calculated to create a state of fear
in the minds of particular persons or group of personal or the
general public.
This therefore means that the act of terrorism is often a calculated and planned
form of action in which the perpetrator has an intended message to pass to their
audience. It is not just the mere satisfaction of causing harm but the demand the
terrorist want met. Terrorism is more all-pervading as it could be employed
by virtually any aggrieved person or persons irrespective of ideological
persuasions to further a cause (just or unjust).
MASS MEDIA
The mass media are taken to encompass newspapers, radio, television, internet and
telephones but other important forms of communications include books, films,
music, theatre and the visual arts.
NIGERIA’S FOURTH REPUBLIC
Page 6
6
Nigeria’s fourth republic refers to the present democratic era starting from 1999 to
date without any military intrusion rule.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
1. To ascertain if any relationship exist between terrorist groups and the media
2. To what extent does publicity benefit terrorists, and how the media benefits from the acts
of terrorists?
3. To find out If there is a symbiotic relationship between terrorism and the media.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study seeks to answer the following posers:
1. What kinds of relationships exist between terrorist groups and the media?
2. How does publicity benefit terrorists, and how the media benefits from the acts of
terrorists viz a viz.
3. To find out If there is a symbiotic relationship between terrorism and the media.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Despite volumes of books, articles and studies of terrorism, there has been scant investment
made in developing a theory of terrorism. Instead, scholars and practitioners devote their efforts
to writing about the history of terrorism, examining a variety of terrorist movements, discussing
the influence of political ideologies and religious belief on terrorists’ motives, dissecting their
operational environments, or analyzing the psychological makeup of terrorists. This has resulted
in a broken looking glass approach to understanding terrorism whereby each fragment casts a
portion of the image but not a complete likeness. As Richard Schultz points out, there has been
intense study of terrorism, but the literature has been “primarily descriptive, prescriptive and
very emotive in form.” This is still the case three decades after Schultz made that assertion, and
such an approach continues to suggest why terrorism is often simply understood as a tactic.
Akinwalere (2013) opines that to fully understand the role of broadcasting in global terrorism
takes us back to media studies on media effect. Originally, the media were thought to be all
Page 7
7
powerful and omnipotent; and this form the basis of initial attempt to use the media to promote
development. Two of the most important media theories in the context of this paper are
agenda setting and framing.
Agenda Setting Theory
Agenda Setting Theory is credited to two researchers Donald Shaw and Maxwell McCombs in
the 1970s who studied people’s reactions to election campaigns through the media (1972, p.
176). Agenda setting is the theory that the more attention a media outlet pays to a certain
phenomenon, the more importance the public attributes to such an issue. (Terrorism & the
Media 2008) In news, an item occurs more than only bringing up certain topics. The way in
which the news is brought, the frame in which the news is presented, is also a choice made by
journalists. Hence, the agenda-setting function of the mass media implies a potentially massive
influence. The basic claim of agenda-setting theory is that people’s understanding of much of
social reality is copied from the media. The agenda-setting function of the media is regarded as
beneficial for the individual and for society. After all, it fulfills a need of the citizens to
orientate themselves properly toward their environment, an environment that is perceived by
them to be ever expanding. Asogwa et al (2012) posit that this theory is significant in analyzing
terrorism and the media because terrorists and international criminals know the power of the
mass media and therefore use them to their advantage by committing destructive activities or
crimes which the media have to report. In this respect the media need the terrorists and the
terrorists need the media to reach out to the public.
Public Right to Information Principle
The mass media are regarded as the “Fourth Estate of the Realm”. It goes to show the important
place the press or the mass media occupy in the world affairs. It is the basic duty of the media to
inform, educate and entertain the public. Under these basic functions media practitioners now
strongly believe that the people have the right to know what is happening around them. This
principle has opened the gates to all sorts of information distribution to the public not minding
their negative effects on the public.
Page 8
8
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
History of Terrorist Attacks in Nigeria’s Nascent Democracy
Copeland (2013) noted that Boko Haram emerged from the northern Nigeria state of Borno.
'Boko' is a Hausa word which means book (especially Western or foreign) while 'Haram' is
an Arabic word meaning 'forbidden', 'ungodly' or 'sinful'. If the words are pieced together,
'Boko Haram' literally means 'book is sinful' (Danjibo, 2009:7 and Adesoji, 2010:100).
But fundamentally the import is that Western education/civilization is sinful, sacrilegious or
ungodly and should be forbidden. Thus Boko Haram stands for outright rejection of
Western education, Western culture and modern science. Rather it advocates the propagation
of strict adherence to Islam in its purest form. Boko Haram represents the vision and mission
of a fundamentalist Islamic movement in Nigeria. The sect known as Jama'atu Ahlis
Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad (people committed to the propagation of the prophet's
teachings and Jihad) seeks to Islamize Nigeria by whatever means at its disposal and at
whatever human cost. This brings in the terrorism angle. So far the dastardly activities of this
sect have been confined to the Northern states and the Federal Capital Territory but there are
indications that the scope may widen with time and more logistic support. Some reports link the
insurgency with earlier iterations of Islamist groups that opposed the Nigerian state but lacked
the international notoriety of the current organization. These accounts associate Boko Haram
with small resistance groups composed of young men that began to congregate in the mid-
1990s, led initially by Abubakar Lawan and later by the pseudonymous Aminu Tashen
Ilimi (“new way of knowledge”). However, a coherent group identity cannot be established until
Mohammed Yusuf, a charismatic Nigerian cleric, gained prominence among local youth in
Maiduguri, Borno’s capital. As Forest (2012) notes, Boko Haram is largely a local phenomenon,
though one with strategic implications, and must be understood and addressed within its local
context and the long standing grievances that motivate terrorist activity. Forest (2012) deftly
explores Nigeria’s ethnic fissures and the role of unequal distribution of power in fueling
terrorism. Boko Haram has increasingly attacked Christian citizens rather than limiting their
offensives to government facilities and personnel. In particular, churches and schools have been
targeted, deepening sectarian tensions across the country.
Page 9
9
The Mass Media and Terrorism
Some terrorist groups engage in violence as a means of gaining popular support for their causes
or organizations. The media is drawn to cover terrorism because terrorism evokes important
news values. In doing so, media outlets may also provide terrorists with an outlet to air their
grievances to a larger audience (Hoffman, 2006). A terrorist organization may hope that attacks
will convince potential supporters or sympathizers that the organization is capable of inflicting
substantial harm or demonstrate that the organization is more effective than rival groups in
challenging the authorities (Chenoweth, 2010; Kydd & Walter, 2006). It is commonly claimed
that terrorists and the media both benefit from high levels of media attention to terrorism
(Hoffman, 2006). Terrorists gain from media attention that communicates their goals and
grievances to a wider audience. The media gain larger audiences because, as previously
discussed, terrorist attacks tap many of the characteristics that communication research identifies
as important for media attention.
Both national and international media are now making series of headlines on Boko Haram’s
terrorist activities (Ibrahim, 2011, pp.14-20).
REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES
Ross (2007) noted that the majority of scholarly research on the connection between terrorism
and the news media has appeared in the form of articles in peer-reviewed journals or chapters in
scholarly books. Less frequent are stand-alone monographs. There is a striking similarity among
these monographs; they cover many of the same topics and often reprint well-cited journal
articles, therefore adding little new information.
However, Ajayi Adegboyega (2012) in his review ‘Boko Haram’ and Terrorism in Nigeria:
Exploratory and Explanatory noted that terrorism exists in Nigeria unfortunately the greatest
causalities in this deadly war are the innocent impoverished masses that do not have the
wherewithal to secure themselves and their properties. This and the unprovoked attacks on
churches and Christians by the terrorists, ostensibly to actualize the complete islamisation
Page 10
10
of the North, makes Boko Haram’s terrorist activities unjustifiable and criminal given the
secular status of Nigeria. Poverty and vagrancy have no religions boundaries just as the
oppressors too cut across ethnic or religious divides. Ajayi concludes that the extent of chaos
and instability that would ensue if every religious persuasions decides to drive their
vision and mission through violence is better imagined. Therefore he recommends stripping
terrorism of religious coloration through well packaged information and mass education
especially through the media about the subject with particular attention being focused on the
fact that no known religion endorses terrorism overtly or tacitly. But also warns that for as
long as acts of terrorism are glorified by indiscreet mass media coverage it will be very
difficult to curtail them. It should be noted that capturing headlines gives psychological
boost to the perpetrators.
Weimann (1991) exposed subjects in an experimental study to varied media coverage of terrorist
actions. He found that levels of support for terrorism were generally quite low, but increased if
the press coverage presented the terrorist organization as “brave,” “just,” “good,” or “kind.” A
recent paper by Lemieux and Asal (2009) implemented a more sophisticated experimental
design. Subjects were exposed to vignettes of fictional personal experiences and asked if they
would respond by engaging in violence, by engaging in peaceful political activity, or by doing
nothing. These vignettes varied in the degree of risk from each action and in the type of
grievance the respondent held against the authorities. Controlling for other factors, the study
found that participants exposed to stronger grievances are more likely to engage in both violence
and peaceful protests and to believe that both of these actions were justified. Schmid (2012)
opined that
terrorists target civilians partly because they are easier targets than the security forces.
They also target them because sudden, unprovoked attacks on innocent
people peacefully leading their daily lives creates shock, terror and confusion but al
so anger far beyond the immediate victims. But this has run contrary to what is obtainable
in Nigeria as noted in the table below as compiled by Ajayi (2012):
Page 11
11
Table. Instances of Boko Haram Attacks: July 2009 to April 2012.
Serial
No
Date Incidents (Nature and Location) Casualty
Figures
1 July 26,
2009
Boko Haram (BH) launched attack on Police Station in
Bauchi triggering a five day uprising that spread to
Maiduguri
Not
Available
(NA)
2 September
7, 2010
BH attacked a prison in Bauchi and freed 700 inmates
former sect members inclusive
5 guards
killed
3 October
11, 2010
Bomb/Gun attack on a Police Station in Maiduguri by the
group
3 persons
injured
4 December
24, 2010
Bomb attack in Jos 8 people
killed
instantly
5 December
28, 2010
BH claims responsibility for the Christmas eve bombing in
Jos
38 people
died in all
6 December
31, 2010
Attack on Mammy market at Army Mogadishu Barracks,
Abuja
11 people
died
7 April 11,
2011
BH attacked Police Station in Bauchi N.A
8 April 9,
2011
BH bombed a Polling Centre in Maiduguri N.A
9 April 20,
2011
Bombing in Maiduguri 1 Policeman
killed
10 April 22,
2011
BH attacked a Prison in Yola and freed 14 prisoners N.A
11 April 24, Four bombs detonated in Maiduguri 3 people
Page 12
12
2011 killed
12 May 29,
2011
Bombing of Army Barracks in Bauchi and Maiduguri 15 people
killed
13 May 31,
2011
Assassination of Abba Anas Ibn Umar Garbai, brother of
the Shehu of Borno in Maiduguri
1 person
killed
14 June 1,
2011
Assassination of Abba El-Kanenu-Shehu of Borno’s
brother in
Maiduguri
1 person
killed
15 June 7,
2011
Parallel Gun and bomb attacks on a church and police
stations in Maiduguri
5 people
killed
16 June 16,
2011
BH bombed Police Headquarters in Abuja Casualty
reports vary
17 June 26,
2011
Bomb attack on a Bar in Maiduguri 25 people
killed
18 August 16,
2011
Bombing of United Nations Office Complex in Abuja Over 34
people killed
19 December
25, 2011
Bombing of St. Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla Over 46
people killed
20 January 6,
2012
BH attacked some Southerners in Mubi 13 people
killed
21 January 21,
2012
Multiple bomb blasts rocked Kano city Over 185
people killed
22 January 29,
2012
Bombing of a Police Station at Naibawa area of Yakatabo,
Kano State
N.A
23 February 8,
2012
Bomb blast rocked Army Headquarters in Kaduna N.A
24 February
15, 2012
Attack on Koton Karfe Prison, Kogi State in which 119
prisoners were freed
1 Warder
killed
Page 13
13
25 February
19, 2012
Bomb blast near Christ Embassy Church, in Suleija, Niger
State
5 people
injured
26 February
26, 2012
Bombing of Church of Christ in Nigeria, Jos 2 people
killed and 38
injured
27 March 8,
2012
An Italian – Franco Lamolinara; and a Briton Christopher
McManus expatriate staff of Stabilim Visioni Construction
Company abducted since mid-2011 were killed by a
splinter group of BH.
2 people
killed
28 March 11,
2012
Bombing of St. Finbarr’s Catholic Church Rayfield, Jos 11 people
killed and
many injured
29 April 26,
2012
Bombing of three media Houses:
(a) This Day, Abuja,
(b) This Day; The Sun and The Moments in Kaduna
Abuja.
5 people
killed and 13
injured
3 people
killed and
many injured
in
Kaduna.
30 April 29,
2012
Attack on Bayero University, Kano 16 people
killed and
many injured
31 April 30,
2012
Bomb explosion in Jalingo 11 people
killed and
several
others
Wounded
Page 14
14
Source: Collated from: Punch, 17, June 2011; Punch, 23 February, 2012; Punch, 27 February,
2012; Guardian, 20 February, 2012, Guardian, 12 March, 2012; Nigerian Tribune 30, January
2012; Punch, 27 April, 2012; Punch 30, April 2012; and, Guardian, 1st May, 2012.
The relationship between terrorism and the media
Bilgen (2012) observed that the reason why the media covers terrorism-related stories is because
terrorism is an attractive boon for media coverage as such coverage makes viewer ratings surge
and profits increase. This perspective holds that terrorists and media outlets have a symbiotic
relationship in which both can benefit from media attention to terrorism. Cohen-Almagor (2005)
stated that there is a delicate relationship between terrorists and the media. Free speech and free
media- the basic instruments of every democracy provide terrorists the publicity they need to
inform the public about their operations and goals. So often times the media has been accused of
being the terrorist’s best friend. Or seen like an ill-mannered enfant terrible, is the media’s
stepchild, a stepchild which the media, unfortunately, can neither completely ignore nor deny”
(Tuman, 2003:115). Thus Dowling (1986) goes far as arguing that terrorists owe their existence
to the media in liberal societies. Terrorists use their immediate victims and material targets for
semiotic and symbolic purposes (Lewis 2005). Most terrorists worldwide today value modern
media of communication very highly because through them their ideologies and the results of
their deadly attacks are communicated to the public locally and internationally. These makes the
terrorists popular and feared. And the media are happy to relay terrorists’ events to the public,
because they consider them newsworthy. BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, Press TV, NTAI, Channels and
many other media organizations (including print) on daily basis write and broadcast terrorists’
activities. Prime time and Front headlines are often devoted to crimes and terrorists events under
Agenda – Setting platform. The terrorist’s need for media publicity and media’s need for a
greater audience and profits form a symbiotic relationship between terrorism and the media.
The media has achieved the above mentioned insinuations by way of status conferral.
Dominick (1993:602) defines status conferral as a process by which media attention bestows a
degree of prominence on certain issues or individuals. Kombol (2012), Sambe (2013), Ishor
(2013) posits that the media confers prestige on members of the society by way of eulogizing,
promoting and encouraging such people. This is through constant featuring of the people in the
Page 15
15
media. This gives the people self-confidence and an air of importance in the same way; it can
sweep people and issues under carpet.
Most terrorists commit acts of violence to get access to the news system. The more atr
ocious their terrorist attack, the more publicity they tend to get from the media.
CONCLUSION
The media no doubt has to perform their surveillance duty by giving us information we need to
live, and warn us about dangers to our state of living. They (media) are supposed to be the
watch-dogs of the society (Hoffmann, 2006). However, the media’s dysfunction with regards to
crime and terrorism make people think that the world is unsafe to live in. This is because most
people believe that what the media present to them is absolute truth. The pictures about events in
the world presented by mass media are therefore seen as authentic.
Terrorists injure and kill in a demonstrative way to frighten the public. The
murders are mostly de-individualized: almost anybody could be a victim. The anonymity of
terrorist killings is an expression of their disrespect for human lives. Any nation with poor
national security would always be greeted with volumes of conflicts that would divert the
government’s attention from carrying out developmental policies and their execution. Many
countries today are faced with criminal and terrorists activities leading to heavy human casualties
and destruction of natural resources. Many people would not like to invest or do business with a
country noted for terrorists’ attacks or conflicts. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo also noted
this in his 18 page letter to President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan titled ‘Before it is too late’
stating that investors are already retreating from Nigeria, adopting “wait and see attitude” and
knowing what we are deficient of, it will take time to reverse the trend and we may miss some
golden opportunities. The governments in such places have no time to devote their energy for
constructive developments that would lift the living standard of the people. In Nigeria for
example, the Niger-Delta crisis seriously affected the economy of the nation. Most of the oil
wells or industries did not function as expected and as such Nigeria could not export enough
crude oil as expected. However, with the introduction of amnesty for the militant groups relative
peace has returned to the area, and export rate of the crude oil has improved. Similarly, the Boko
Page 16
16
Haram group, based in Borno State, is causing havoc almost on daily basis in the nation’s capital
Abuja and many parts of the States in the north (Ibrahim, 2011). Meaningful developments in
such areas are put on hold. Attention is now diverted to finding solutions to the Boko Haram
saga. The national security is really at stake with this terrorists group that hates western
education.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In his letter to President Goodluck Jonathan, former President Olusegun Obasanjo noted that one
single prescription cannot cure all these ailments that combine in Boko Haram. Therefore, the
following recommendations have been proffered:
1. One way of divesting terrorism of religious coloration is through well packaged
information and mass education especially through the media about the subject with
particular attention being focused on the fact that no known religion endorses
terrorism overtly or tacitly. But for as long as acts of terrorism are glorified by
indiscreet mass media coverage it will be very difficult to curtail them (Ajayi, 2012). It
should be noted that capturing headlines gives psychological boost to the
perpetrators for as Scarpetti and Andersen (1992) have rightly observed, acts of
terrorism usually includes the quest for publicity (Scarpetti and Anderson, 1992:96-
97). This is especially so in this new age when improved communication has
reduced the world into a global village. The mass media, therefore, have a
responsibility not to sensationalize acts of terrorism but to condemn them in unmistakable
terms.
2. Ajayi (2012) adds that Government must also give positive consideration to the
increasingly popular demand for a national conference as a credible platform for
ascertaining prevalent grievances of the diverse ethno-religious groups for possible
remediation. This is very important because even if Boko Haram threat is
obliterated somehow now, there are several other groups and peoples who are
bidding their time before venting their anger and frustration on the nation and other
hapless people.
Page 17
17
3. Fundamentally government must address the problems of mass unemployment, poverty
and illiteracy concretely in order to deplete the ranks of malcontents who constitute
a ready pool of foot soldiers for criminal activities.
4. The media are expected not simply to report whatever the terrorists are saying. It is the
media’s duty to exercise some judgment and scrutinize the terrorist’s messages. The
media need not play into the hands of terrorism, serving their interests and their political
agenda.
5. The media are advised not to take upon themselves to mediate between the terrorist and
the government. Special qualifications are required before one assumes such a
responsibility upon oneself. Journalists are there to cover the event, not to become part of
it.
6. For the Internet the situation is somewhat different. Self-regulation or education may
help for regular media, but not for reducing the number of terrorist Internet
pages. These are directly controlled either by terrorists themselves or by people or
organizations closely liaised to them. As such they are an actual weapon for terrorist
organizations, instead of – like regular media merely a medium for their messages. In
addition, the new media are thought to be more effective in achieving terrorist objectives
than the old media. Therefore, countering terrorist use of new, directly controlled media
is probably more likely to be accepted, and more likely to be successful in taking
away an actual recruiting mechanism of those organizations.
7. NBC Code 2002 Chapter 3.11.0 on “Violence, cruelty and Horror” should be adhered
to, in creating balance in reportage.
Page 18
18
REFERENCES
Adesoji, A. (2010) “The Boko Haram Uprising and Islamic Revivalism in Nigeria”, in Africa
Spectrum, 45(2): 95-108
Ajayi, A.I. (2012) ‘Boko Haram’ and Terrorism in Nigeria: Exploratory and Explanatory notes’.
Global Advanced Research Journal of History, Political Science and International
Relations Vol. 1(5) pp. 103-107, July, 2012
Akinwalere, I. (2013) Mass Media and Terrorism in Nigeria. http://newsnowmagazines.blog
Sunday, 24 March 2013.
Asogwa, C. E., Iyere J. I. & Attah C. O. (2012) The Mass Media Reportage of Crimes and
Terrorists Activities: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Asian Culture and History
Vol. 4, No. 2.
Baran, J. (2008) “Terrorism & the Mass Media after Al-Qaeda: A Change of Course?” The
Peace & Conflict Review 3.
http://www.review.upeace.org/index.cfm?opcion=o&ejemplar=7&entrada=63
Barnhurst, K. G. (1991). The Literature from Terrorism. In A.O. Alali & K.K. Eke, Media
coverage of Terrorism, Methods of Diffusion. London: Sage, (pp. 112-137)
Bilgen, A. (2012) Terrorism and the Media: A Dangerous Symbiosis. Washington: The George
Washington University.
Chenoweth, E. (2010). Democratic Competition and Terrorist Activity. Journal of Politics, 72,
16–30.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2005) Media Coverage of Acts of Terrorism: Troubling Episodes and
Suggested Guidelines. Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol 30. P.383-409
Copeland, F (2013) The Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria. Civil-Military Fusion Center.
www.cimicweb.org.
Page 19
19
Danjibo, N.D. (2009). ‘Islamic Fundamentalism and Sectarian Violence: The ‘Maitatsine’
and ‘Boko Haram’ Crises in Northern Nigeria.’ Peace and Conflict Studies Paper
Series, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan, pp. 1 – 21.
Dominick, J.R (1993) The Dynamics of Mass Communication 4th
Ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Dowling, R.E (1986) ‘Terrorism and the Media: A Rhetorical Genre’. Journal of Communication
Vol 36(1), P. 12-24
Forest, J.J.F (2012) Confronting the Terrorism of Boko Haram in Nigeria. Florida: The Joint
Special Operations University (JSOU) Press.
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ibrahim, I. (2011, August 1). The Boko Haram Killings. The News Watch, 1-20.
Ishor, D.G (2013) Security Challenges in Nasarawa State and Nigeria: Journalists as Catalysts.
Paper Presented at NUJ Conference in Nasarawa State 2013.
Keghku, T. & Edema, A.J.M., (2012) A Conceptual Overview of the Relationships and
Differences between Public Relations, Journalism, Advertising, Marketing and
Propaganda Practice in Nigeria. Benue Journal of Communication and Development
(BJCD) Volume 2 Numbers 1&2. The Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of
Social Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi
Koh, H.H. (2002). ‘Preserving American Values’: In Paletz, D.L. & Schmid, C.D. Terrorism
and the Media. (pp. 3). London: Sage.
Kombol, M.A (2012) ‘Influence of the Status Conferral Function on Selected Television
Announcers’. Benue Journal of Communication and Development Vol 2 Numbers 1&2
Kydd, A., & Walter, B. (2006). The strategies of terrorism. International Security, 31(1), 49–
79.
Page 20
20
Lemieux, A. F., & Asal, V. H. (2009). Grievance, risk, and enemy images in the choice and
justification of terror versus protest. Manuscript, National Consortium for the Study of
Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, University of Maryland.
Lewis, J. (2005) Language Wars: The Role of Media and Culture in Global Terror and Political
Violence. London: Pluto Press
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1970). The Agenda – Setting function of Mass Media. Public
Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
Nacos, B.L. (2002). Mass-mediated terrorism: The central role of media in terrorism and
counter-terrorism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Obasanjo, O (2013, December 2) Before it is too late. ThisDay.
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/obasanjo-letter-to-jonathan-before-it-is-too-
late/167193/
Perešin, A (2007) Mass Media and Terrorism. Zagreb: University of Zagreb Press
Ross, J.I (2007) Deconstructing the Terrorism–News Media Relationship. Sage Publications:
New Delhi
Sambe, S.A. (2013) Traditional and Conventional Functions of the Media. Unpublished M.Sc
lecture note on Mass Media and Society COM 709.
Sambe, S.A (2014) Reporting Boko Haram and Terrorists Acts. Unpublished M.Sc Lecture note
on Advanced Reporting and Editing COM 712.
Scarpitti, F.R., & Andersen, M. L. (1992). Social Problems 2nd
Ed. New York, Harper Collins
Publisher Inc. p.95
Schmid, A. P (2012) Strengthening the Role of Victims and Incorporating Victims in Efforts to
Counter Violent Extremism and Terrorism. International Center for Counter-Terrorism
Research Paper: The Hague.
Page 21
21
Schultz, R. “Conceptualizing Political Terrorism: A Typology,” Journal of International Affairs,
Vol. 32, No. 1, p. 7.
Torres Soriano, M. R. (2008). Terrorism and the Mass Media after Al Qaeda: A Change of
Course? Athena Intelligence Journal Vol. 3, No 1, (2008), pp. 1-20
Transnational Terrorism, Security & the Rule of Law. July 23, 2008. Terrorism and the Media.
The European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme. Deliverable 6,
Workpackage 4. http://www.transnationalterrorism.eu
Tuman, J.S. (2003) Communicating Terror: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism. London:
SAGE Publications.
Weimann, G. (1991). Theater of terror. Journal of Communication, 33, 38–45