SWIFT Benelux Forum How to get ready for T2S Isabelle Olivier Tanja Haase
May 27, 2015
Background of TARGET2-Securities (T2S)
Why does Europe need T2S?
Motives for the T2S-Project:
• Europe’s securities markets are too fragmented and inefficient
• There is a lack of competition in services related to settlement
• Europe needs a single pool of securities to stimulate competition
and harmonisation
• There is no other realistic Europe-wide approach to create this
single pool
Making Europe a better place to invest and trade
(in line with the Lisbon agenda)
T2S – Why?
EU-US settlement flows comparison
Source: « T2S – Settling Without Borders », European Central Bank, November 2009
TARGET 2 Securities (T2S) (as from June 2015)
TARGET2 (RTGS, live since November 2007)
• Customers connect
indirectly to T2S via CSDs
• Need to retain existing
relationships with multiple
service providers
• Minimizes the impact of T2S
on the established structures
and relationships
Customer
CSD
Sub-
Custodian
TARGET2-Securities
CSD CSD
Sub-
Custodian
direct te
chnic
al connectivity
Customer
CSD
TARGET2-Securities
CSD n
CSD 3
CSD 2
CSD 1
Customer
CSD
TARGET2-Securities
CSD n
CSD 3
CSD 2
CSD 1
direct te
chnic
al connectivity
• Customers connect directly
to T2S providing the most
proximity to the settlement
engine
• Requires substantial
investments
• Connection to CSDs is still
required for non-core
settlement services
• Customers connect indirectly
to T2S via a CSD, which may
replace existing links to agents,
custodians and local CSDs
• Significantly reduces operating
costs
• Considered as most optimized
solution for majority of
participants
* Graphic: European Central Bank presentation „T2S:
Settling without borders in Europe”, January 2012
Participants can communicate indirectly or directly
with T2S
T2S Migration plan and timeline
CSDs
• Euroclear ESES
(BE, FR, NL)
• Interbolsa
• NBB – SSS
• BOGS
• Depozitarul
Central Romania
• Malta Stock
Exchange
• Monte Titoli
• SIX SIS Ltd
• AS Eesti
Väärtpaberikeskus
• CDCP Slovakia
• Euroclear FI
• Iberclear
• KDD Slovenia
• CSDs of Lithuania
• & Latvia
• BNY Mellon CSD
9 months Wave 2
28/03/2016
Wave 3
12/09/2016
Wave 1
22/06/2015 6 months 5 months Wave 4
6/02/2017 Min 3 months
Contingency
Wave
• Clearstream Banking
• Keler Hungary
• LuxCSD
• OeKB
• VP Lux
• VP Securities
Confirmed DCPs in Wave 1 Wave 2
28/03/2016
Wave 3
12/09/2016
Wave 1
22/06/2015
Wave 4
6/02/2017
DCPs for securities and cash:
• ABN AMRO Clearing Bank NV
• BNP Paribas Securities Services
• Citi
• Clearstream Banking S.A. (CBL)
• Deutsche Bank
• European Central Counterparty
• Iccrea Banca S.p.A.
• Intesa Sanpaolo
• Istituto Centrale delle Banche Popolari
Italiane S.p.A.
• LCH.Clearnet SA
• Parel
• Société Générale Securities Services S.p.A.
• The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV
DCPs on the cash side only: • Banca Popolare di Sondrio
• Banco Popolare Società Cooperativa
• Cassa Centrale Raiffeisen
dell’Alto Adige S.p.A.
• Commerzbank
• Kasbank
• Monte dei Paschi di Siena
• Morgan Stanley Bank
• Société Générale
• Unicredit S.p.A.
T2S Testing timeline
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q3 Q4 Q3
Connectivity
Bilateral I/O
Multilateral I/O
Community
Business Day
20152013 2014
T2S
Wav
e 1
Q2 Q1 Q2
Pilot Phase
Go Live
CSDs and Central Banks
• Participate in all testing stages
• Coordinate and support the testing
activities of their communities
CSD participants and Payment Banks
• DCPs participate in the Connectivity
testing stage
• DCPs and ICPs participate in the
Community and Business Day testing
stages
Key concerns of ICPs
What will my service providers’ offering be?
How will my current communication be
impacted by my provider’s requirements for
T2S?
What are the functional changes introduced
by T2S? What opportunities do they bring?
How can I leverage T2S opportunities without
going direct?
Who can help me assess the STP quality of
Corporate Actions, Collateral, Liquidity
communications from my different providers?
…
Getting ready for T2S
Familiarize with T2S
• Understanding T2S functionalities, flows and messages
• Training and knowledge transfer
Impact assessment
• Analyse impact on your messaging and processes
• Standards gap analysis
Design & Implementation
• Design revised message flows
• Implement changes &test with providers
T2S – ISO messages for
liquidity and collateral
management
Cash and Liquidity
management
Auto-collateralisation
(Central Bank/ Client
collateralisation, Limit
management, ...)
Bilateral collateral
management (Repo &
pledge, CCP scenario, …)
T2S – ISO messages for
securities settlement and
management
T2S message flows and
related services, illustrated
against a specified
business context and set of
actors
Case scenarios to illustrate
detailed message content
for settlement, liquidity
management, static data
T2S in 90 minutes
Impact of T2S on different
market players
T2S features: lifecycle
management and
matching, instruction
maintenance, settlement,
liquidity management,
accounting day
10
SWIFT Training for T2S
Understanding T2S-related messages and flows
ISO 20022
for S&R (and CA)
ISO 20022 for securities
in the settlement and
reconciliation (and
corporate actions)
lifecycles
Case scenarios to
illustrate detailed
message content
ISO 15022 enhanced
for ICPs
ISO 15022 enhanced
messages, the new
processes and flows behind
Case scenarios to illustrate
new guidelines and
implementation attention
points
BAH in
T2S environment
Use of BAH both for
securities and payments
ISO 20022 messages in
the settlement lifecycle
The chain and various
scenarios between
participants, CSDs and
the T2S platform
11
SWIFT Training for T2S – what’s next
Insight on future modules
UNDER DEVELOPMENT
ISO 20022
for S&R (and CA)
Analyse potential of ISO 20022
richness to upgrade your services
Apply your local practice or CSD
guidelines to ISO 20022
Build ISO 20022 scenarios and
communication flows customised
to your market/business
Map your current format with ISO
20022 and select the best options
to manage gaps
Document and implement your
new communication model (be it
translation from/to or direct
implementation of ISO 20022)
ISO 15022 enhanced
for ICPs
Apply your local practice or CSD
guidelines to ISO 15022 enhanced
Build ISO 15022 enhanced
scenarios and communication flows
customised to your market/business
Map your current format with ISO
15022 enhanced and select the best
options to manage gaps
Document and implement your new
communication model (be it
translation from/to or direct
implementation of ISO 15022
enhanced)
BAH in
T2S environment
Business workshop(s) to build
BAH scenarios in your specific
business model, considering your
role(s) in the settlement chain and
the data to be sent/received from
your service providers/customers
Technical workshop(s) to
understand the technical aspects
of implementing the BAH
signature
12
SWIFT Consulting for T2S – what’s next
Insight on future modules
A number of MT changes have been made to maintain compatibility with
ISO 20022 as it evolves to support the requirements of T2S.
Impact of T2S on financial messaging
Standards gap analysis
Domestic formats
ISO 15022 (enhanced)
ISO 20022
ICP
ISO 15022
ISO 20022
T2S
DiCoA Domestic
ISO 20022
Standards gap analysis
Example: New functionalities offered
sese.023
MT 543 to deliver out
a restricted balance
must be “enhanced”
i.e. refer to the
restriction reference.
ICP
T2S
DiCoA
MT 543
T2S will allow CSDs and NCBs to define their own restriction types.
Restriction types restrict the usage of a balance:
- blocking
- reservation
- earmarking
When a certain balance becomes restricted, T2S assigns a ‘restriction
reference’ to which all subsequent messages have to refer to.
MyStandards for T2S and CSD Communities
Easy access to your market guidelines and adaptation requirements
ISO 15022
ISO 20022
ICP
T2S
ISO 20022
DiCoA
Use MyStandards to
manage and publish
T2S specifications
Consume the T2S
specifications in
MyStandards
Enrich, compare,
manage and publish
their internal
specifications
Consume the specs of
service providers via
MyStandards.
Use the platform to
document current
capabilities and
compare.
ISO 15022 ISO 15022E ISO 15022E ISO 20022
Bridging the gap between ISO 15022 and ISO 20022 by introducing an intermediary
layer: ISO 15022 Enhanced
ISO 15022
ISO 20022
ICP
T2S
ISO 20022
DiCoA
Driven by your CSDs’/ agents’
specifications
MyStandards
Readiness Portal
for T2S
MyStandards
Readiness
Portal
Migrating to
new/ enhanced
messaging
Define scope of
Implementation
+ business scenarios
DiCoA flows with T2S
MyStandards and the Readiness Portal Simplifying T2S implementation
Getting Ready for T2S User Testing Execution
Coordinated testing services with SWIFT
Present at every step of the process (strategy, planning, design,
execution, quality)
In-depth expertise in T2S business and technical domains
Using best-in-class testing management tools
Unique integrated set of products to automate testing against T2S usage guidelines
Accompanying you till T2S connectivity testing over SWIFT VAN
Customer
resources
Test Manager
Business
&Technical
Experts
Getting ready for T2S
Familiarze with T2S
• Training courses on
• ISO messages for securities settlement, liquidity and collateral management
• ISO 15022 enhanced for ICPs
• Etc…
Impact assessment
• Business Consulting: Impact Assessment studies & project management
• Standards gap analysis
• Message usage guideline definition
• Etc…
Design & Implementation
• Technical consulting: functional and technical design
• Testing services
• Readiness Portal
• Etc….