Top Banner
Beneath the Surface A review of key facts in the oilsands debate Simon Dyer January 2013
28

Beneath the surface

Feb 20, 2017

Download

Environment

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Beneath the surface

Beneath the SurfaceA review of key facts in the oilsands debate

Simon Dyer

January 2013

Page 2: Beneath the surface

2

Leading Canada’s transition to a clean energy futureThe Pembina Institute is a national non-profit think tank that advances clean energy solutions through research, education, consulting and advocacy.

Page 3: Beneath the surface

3

Presentation Overview• Climate and air• Water• Tailings• Land and wildlife• Economics

Page 4: Beneath the surface

4

Climate and AirAverage oilsands production is significantly more greenhouse gas (GHG)-intensive than conventional oil production

• Production emissions typically 3.2 to 4.5 times more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional oil

• Lifecycle emissions are higher than conventional (23% EU, 8-37% Canada/US)

Page 5: Beneath the surface

5

Climate and AirOilsands emissions are a growing problem• Large per-barrel decreases in GHG intensity have stalled

or worsened

Past changes in industry-wide greenhouse gas intensity in the oilsands

Page 6: Beneath the surface

6

Climate and AirOilsands emissions matter on a national scale, and are a significant barrier to meeting Canada’s 2020 climate commitment• Oilsands emissions accounted for 7% of Canada’s

emissions in 2010, forecasted to be 14% in 2020• Emissions forecast to reach levels higher than the

emissions from every province except AB and ON

Page 7: Beneath the surface

7

Climate and AirOilsands emissions matter on a global scale• Canada is among top-10 GHG producers on absolute and

per capita basis• Oilsands growth is challenging Canada to meet its

international climate target due to massive growth • While other sectors in Canada’s economy are expected to

reduce GHGs by 67 Mt by 2020 (relative to 2005 levels), oilsands GHGs are expected to add 72 Mt of GHGs

Page 8: Beneath the surface

8

Climate and AirCurrent regulations do not result in meaningful reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from oilsands development• Alberta regulations ($15/tonne x 12% of emissions = $1.80

compliance cost)• Carbon capture and storage costs $95-$225/tonne

Page 9: Beneath the surface

9

Climate and AirAir quality is starting to be impacted by oilsands air pollution• Air quality exceedances increasing• 33X more exceedances in northeastern AB in 2009

compared to 2004• Air concentrations for NO2, SO2, H2S and O3 getting close

to limit levels

Page 10: Beneath the surface

10

Climate and AirForecasted growth in oilsands will present very serious air pollution challenges in the Wood Buffalo Region• Approved production is almost triple current operating

levels • Modeled predictions for NO2 levels already exceed

Alberta’s air quality limits

Page 11: Beneath the surface

11

WaterWater monitoring in northeastern Alberta has been inadequate, yet governments continue to approve new oilsands projects• Federal/Provincial plan not complete until 2015• 5.2 million barrels approved• Peer-reviewed research continues to show oilsands

development is having an impact on water quality• Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons now 2.5 to 23 times

greater than 1960 levels in some lakes due to oilsands development

Page 12: Beneath the surface

12

WaterOilsands extraction uses large amounts of water, despite recycling efforts• Mining – 2 to 4 barrels of water per barrel of bitumen after

recycling• In situ extraction – 0.8 to 1.7 barrels of water to extract and

upgrade a barrel of oil• In 2011, oilsands industry used 170 million cubic metres of

water, equivalent to the residential water use of 1.7 million Canadians

Page 13: Beneath the surface

13

WaterOilsands companies are not required to stop withdrawing water from the Athabasca River, even if river flows are so low that fisheries and habitat are at risk• Water allocations from Athabasca River nearly doubled in

past decade due to oilsands• Current water withdrawal management framework

prioritizes industry use over aquatic protection• Missing element – Ecosystem Base Flow (EBF) absolute

cut off point above which no withdrawals are allowed (rare event, 1/100 years)

• GoA now missed two deadlines to release final framework

Page 14: Beneath the surface

14

TailingsOilsands tailings volumes continue to grow due to a permissive regulatory approach• Current tailings rules not enforced• Lack of transparent reporting to indicate how companies

are faring today• Rules only address a portion of tailings production• 250% increase in tailings area since 2005• Current area = 176 square kilometres• Current volume = 830 million cubic metres

Page 15: Beneath the surface

15

TailingsTailings lakes house compounds known to be acutely toxic to aquatic organisms• Tailings concentrate naturally occurring compounds to

toxic levels over time• Source of metals, PAHs, hydrocarbons, naphthenic acids

and solvents

Page 16: Beneath the surface

16

TailingsTailings lakes seep an undetermined amount of toxic waste• Tailings seepage rate is ~ 11 million litres/day• Little publicly available information exists to indicate how

operators are monitoring or capturing this seepage

Page 17: Beneath the surface

17

TailingsCapping toxic tailings waste in end pit lakes with water is an unproven and risky concept• Could take decades to determine whether end pit lakes are

a viable and safe permanent storage site for tailings • 29 end pit lakes have been proposed by oilsands

operators

Page 18: Beneath the surface

18

Land and WildlifeRestoration of wetlands continues to be a major challenge and may never occur• Peatlands likely to be permanently lost after mining• As of 2011, approved mining production is expected to result

in a loss of approximately 28,000 hectares of peatland• Alberta has no wetland policy to prevent wetland loss in

northeastern Alberta

Julia Kilpatrick
Seems like there should be a bullet here about why peatland loss matters — i.e. biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, etc. Otherwise, so what?
Page 19: Beneath the surface

19

Land and WildlifeThe boreal forest will not be restored to its native state following mine closure• Objective is equivalent land capability vs. pre disturbance

state• Forest uplands and end pit lakes vs. peatlands and old

growth forests• Only 0.1% of total area disturbed by oilsands mining certified

as reclaimed

Julia Kilpatrick
Jargon alert — this bullet and the next one need to be re-written in plain language.
Page 20: Beneath the surface

20

Land and Wildlife

Oilsands disturbance vs. reclamation from 1987-2008Source: Alberta Environment

Page 21: Beneath the surface

21

Land and WildlifeIn situ developments may affect a much larger area than oilsands mining• In situ potential 30X larger than mineable region• More GHG-intensive than mining• Results in significant landscape fragmentation

Page 22: Beneath the surface

22

Land and WildlifeWoodland caribou herds are declining in the oilsands and are on track to be extirpated• Local extinction likely in 30 years• Federal recovery strategy identifies 65% intact habitat

target • Undisturbed caribou habitat in Northeastern Alberta = 24%

Julia Kilpatrick
Picture - sure those are caribou? look like white tails, sort of :)
Page 23: Beneath the surface

23

Land and WildlifeOilsands development threatens to harm millions of birds through habitat fragmentation and destruction • Regional bird populations currently healthy• Mining may impact the breeding habitat for 280,000 to 3.6

million birds over 20-40 year period• In situ development could impact as many as 14.5 million

birds

Julia Kilpatrick
Not sure if this is a Pembina photo — any non-pembina pics need to be credited, and technically we should be asking approval before using. Definitely need to get OK before posting online but probably ok to just use them in private presentations if source is unknown. if they're from the creative commons, it's fine.
Page 24: Beneath the surface

24

EconomicsTaxpayers may foot the bill for cleanup of oilsands mines • Operators not responsible for 100% of cost of cleanup• Little reclamation security and protection for Albertans over

life of mine until the end

Julia Kilpatrick
Don't we have a number representing the amount of money taxpayers may be liable for in cleanup costs? That would make this slide much more persuasive.
Page 25: Beneath the surface

25

EconomicsThe costs and benefits of oilsands development are not spread evenly across Canada • AB expected to reap 94% of GDP impacts from oilsands

development• Jobs created by oilsands in next 25 years – 86% will

remain in AB• Manufacturing sector declining while natural resource

sector booming

Page 26: Beneath the surface

26

EconomicsRelying on the volatile profits from oilsands projects to fund essential services creates financial risks for both the private and public sector • Oil grown from 18% to 46% of total Canadian commodity

production in past 15 years• Price of oil fluctuates widely • Oilsands producers have a narrow price window in which to

operate • Oilsands roller coaster unreliable means to fund social

programs and provide ongoing revenue

Page 27: Beneath the surface

27

Conclusions• Significant opportunities to address oilsands

mismanagement• Need a greater emphasis on management vs.

communications• Pace and scale need to slow to accommodate

new policy solutions• Role of technology limited without regulatory

drivers

Page 28: Beneath the surface

pembina.org

pembina.org/subscriptionPembina eNews, Media releases, Publication alerts

twitter.com/pembina facebook.com/pembina.institute