Page 1
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 1/69
A PROJECT REPORT
ON
“BENCHMARKING SURVEY OF REWARDS AND
RECOGNITOIN POLICIES”
AT
RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
(Corporate Office, Mumbai)
SUBMITTED BY
TEJASHREE M. NAKHARE
MBA (HRM)
2010-2012
IN PARTIAL FUFILLMENT OF THE MASTERS DEGREE
IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA)
(HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT)
TO
UNIVERSITY OF PUNE
THROUGH
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF COST &
MANAGEMENT STUDIES & RESEARCH
(INDSEARCH)PUNE
Page 2
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 2/69
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I sincerely wish to acknowledge a deep gratitude for valuable guidance; suggestions and generous helpextended to me by Mr Rajeev Bhaduria and Mr Vinayak Dhonde . I thank them for being the source
both of helpful criticism and of encouragement.
I take this opportunity to thank all the members of Reliance Infra (mumbai) who directly and
indirectly helped me in completing my report and a special thanks to:
Ms. Trina Das, Ms. Rupali Chavhan, Mr. AmitRaj Varma and Ms. Smita Shilwant.
Their encouragement during the difficult stages of this project, constructive discussions and useful
interaction has proved to be core moral support behind this achievement.
Then again this acknowledgement would remain incomplete without expressing my sincere thanks to
Mr. Ashok Joshi (Dean IndSearch), Mr. Rohan Sachdeo (Project Guide) and Mr. Ramrao Randive
for their constant guidance in every aspect of this project.
Thanks to all those who have directly or indirectly helped me in preparation of this Project.
Tejashree M. Nakhare
Date:
Page 3
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 3/69
PREFACE
Managing human resources in today’s dynamic environment is becoming more and more complex as
well as important. Recognition of people as a valuable resource in the organization has led to increasestrends in employee maintenance, job security, etc.
My research project deals with “Benchmark survey of Rewards and recognition policy”. In this report, I
have studied & evaluated the Rewards and recognition policies followed in different companies.
The first section of my report deals with a detailed company profile. It includes the company’s history:
its activities and operations, organizational structure, etc. this section attempts to give detailed
information about the company and the nature of its functioning.
The second section deals with rewards and recognition. In this section, I have given a brief conceptual
explanation to performance appraisal. It contains the definition, process and significance of performance
appraisal.
In the third section of my report, I have conducted a research study to evaluate the process of rewards
and recognition policies followed in different companies; this section also contains my findings,
conclusions and suggestions.
The fourth and final section of this report consists of extra information that I related to the main contents
of the report. These annexure include some graphs and diagrams relating to the company, graphs
relating to the research study and important documents upon which the project is based.
Page 4
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 4/69
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Serial no. Content Page no.
2 Chapter 1 : Introduction to the topic 1
3 Chapter 2 : Executive summary 16
4 Chapter 3 : Company Profile 17
5 Chapter 4 : Scope of Project 21
6 Chapter 5 : Objective of Study 22
7 Chapter 6 : Methodology 23
8 Chapter 7 : Observation and analysis 25
9 Chapter 8 : Suggestions 51
10 Chapter 9 : Limitations 52
11 Chapter 10 : Bibliography 53
12 Chapter 11 : Annexure 54
Page 5
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 5/69
Chapter 1
Introduction to the topic
2.1 Recognition/rewardsEmployees not only want good pay and benefits, they also want to be valued and appreciated for their
work, treated fairly, do work that is important, have advancement opportunities, and opportunities to
be involved in the agency. Recognition and rewards play an important role in work unit and agency
programs to attract and retain their employees. It is the day-to-day interactions that make employees
feel that their contributions are appreciated and that they are recognized for their own unique qualities.
This type of recognition may contribute to high morale in the work environment. So, it’s extremely
important that managers, who communicate the agency goals to employees, are included in the
development of recognition programs.
WHAT’S MOST IMPORTANT IN A RECOGNITION PROGRAM?
TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT:
TO EMPLOYEES: TO MANAGERS OFPROGRAM:
Increases productivity Satisfies recognition Needs
¨Includes efficientadministration
Produces Return On
Investment (ROI)
Creates positive
recognition experience
Excites employees
Improves attitudes Provides a wide selectionof attractive, personalizedawards
Creates pride
Builds loyalty andCommitment
Provides timeliness of recognition
Pleases management
Generates positiveFeedback
Guarantees quality of award
Involves all employees
Empowers the workforce Fosters opencommunication of appreciation
Develops a partnershipwith the workforce
Assures efficiencySource: O.C. Tanner, 2000
The organization that can differentiate between, and effectively fulfil, all three levels of concerns
(senior management, employees, and managers of the program) may achieve levels of performance
Page 6
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 6/69
they may never have thought possible. In addition, an effective recognition program should meet
several essential criteria:
(a) The recognition program does not exclude any employee
(b) The employees know exactly what should be accomplished in order to earn recognition and
rewards
© The manager’s success is tied to the employees’ success
Recognition is a leadership tool that sends a message to employees about what is important to the
leaders and the behaviors that are valued. Managers can use this tool to help employees understand
how their jobs contribute to the a gency’s overall goals and how their performance affects the
achievement of those goals. Often people have come to accept the notion that an employee is paid to
do their job. So why should they be praised for doing what they’re paid to do? Praise of an empl oyee
reinforces, recognizes and motivates behaviors that you, as the manager, want to see.Recognition can be delivered in a number of ways. Think about just saying “Thanks.” What does
praise cost? Praise is inexpensive. If it only takes a few minutes to reap days’ worth of increased
productivity and morale, isn’t it worth it? This doesn’t mean that meaningless “warm fuzzies” are
going to work, however. Use Jim Brintnall’s description of “What Makes a Good Reward?”
It’s got to be SMART ! That means that rewards should be:
· Sincere . Above all else, a good reward should reflect a genuine expression of appreciation. Token
acknowledgements leave something to be desired.
· Meaningful . To endure a motivating influence, rewards should be aligned with the values, goals, and
priorities that matter the most.
· Adaptable . The diverse workplace demands alternatives. Consider creative options to keep your
program fresh. No single reward format works for everyone all the time.
[Recognition should be adapted and valuable to the receiver.]
· Relevant . Some personal dimension is essential to a good reward. No matter how formal or informal,
expensive or affordable, the relevance of any recognition will be improved with a personal touch - -
it’s a little thing that makes a big difference.
[Recognition should be provided by someone of significance to the receiver.]
· Timely . It is important that rewards respond to the behavior they are intending to reinforce. Don’t let
too much time pass or the reward may be devalued and credibility eroded.
Page 7
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 7/69
To ensure that employees tie recognition into the work unit or agency’s str ategic goals, be certain to
tell employees what they did right and how it interacts with the goals. Include supervisors and
employees in the development of your recognition program to represent the values and goals of a
diverse cross-section of the work unit or agency. Provide the opportunity for recognition to come from
a variety of sources. Peer-to-peer recognition usually is highly valued by employees. It can be used to
develop a supportive work environment.
Step-by-step guideline:
· Step One – Target Your Audience
· Step Two – Choose the Goal
· Step Three – Build a Budget
· Step Four – Develop Criteria· Step Five – Choose the Awards
· Step Six – Communicate the Program
· Step Seven – Present the Award(s)
· Step Eight – Evaluate the Program
2.2 Rewards and Recognition Policies at R-Infra
Scope & Criteria:
Applicable to all businesses of Reliance Infrastructure and associated group companies.
All regular employees of the company up to Grade A6. (Excluding “Thank You Slips)
Not applicable to Business Heads, Functional Heads, Divisional Heads, Plant Heads and EPC project
Heads.
Recognition & Rewards Categories:
Individual Level - Thank You Slips
Silver Level Recognition - Appreciation Letter
Golden Level Recognition & Reward
Paradigm Shift Trophy
Page 8
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 8/69
Page 9
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 9/69
Cost / Productivity
Customer delight
Timeliness
Safety
Table 1.1
Evaluation Parameters - Paradigm Shi ft T rophy
Parameter
CategoryParameter
Overall
Weight
age
Weight
age
(W)
Score(S)
Total
Score
(WxS)
Max.
score
Min
Score
Over allUniqueness of
Idea45% 45 225 45
Inputs
Investment in
Rs
15%
5 25 5
Time Frame
for Design,
Development
and
Implementatio
n
5 25 5
No. of people
responsible
for delivering
5 25 5
Output/Res
ults
Financial
gains in Rs 40% 20 100 20
Enhancement 10 50 10
Page 10
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 10/69
in customer
service
Process
Improvement10 50 10
TOTAL 100% 100 500 100
1.2- Criteria
SCALE Definition
Uniqueness of Idea
Score Definition
1 Never been implemented in Our Organization.
2 Never been implemented in any Similar industry across the Country
3 Never been implemented in any Similar industry
across the world
4 Never been implemented in any industry across the Country
5 Never been implemented in any industry across the world
Investment (in Rs.)
Score Definition
1 5 lacs and above
2 Between 3.5 lacs to 5 lacs
Page 11
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 11/69
3 Between 2.1 lacs to 3.5 lacs
4 Between 1.1 lacs to 2 lacs
5 Below 1 lac
Note: Manpower cost invested shall also be included.
Time Frame for Design, Development and Implementation
( In terms of Man Hrs. / Man days)
Score Definition
1 1 year and above
2 10 months to 12 months
3 8 months to 10 months
4 6 months to 8 months
5 6 months and below
No. of Persons responsible for delivering
Score Definition
1 more than 5
2 4
3 3
4 2
5 1
Page 12
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 12/69
Financial gains in Rs. Per year
Score Definition
1 Less than 2 lacs / year
2 2 lacs to 4 lacs /year
3 4 to 6 lacs /year
4 6 to 8 lacs /year
5 8 lacs and above / year
Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.
Business / Function Specific Parameter for Enhancement in customer service eg :
reduction of Waiting time, cycle time, Complaints ,Defect, Turn Around Time
Score Definition
1 Poor
2 Average
3 Good
4 Very Good
5 Excellent
The Shining Star Award:
To recognize the consistency of initiative and enterprise displayed by an employee in taking up
new projects or assignments beyond his defined job role to improve processes/services which result in
Page 13
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 13/69
improving the functional/business/organizational performance at large by considering any of the
following areas:
Creative problem solving
Cost / Productivity
Customer delight
Timeliness
Safety
Table 2.1
Evaluation Parameters -The Shinin g Star Tr ophy
Parameter
Category
ParameterOverallWeightag
e
Weightag
eScore
TotalScore
(W*S)
Max.
score
Min
Score
Initiati
ve
Initiative taken
beyond defined
job role
25% 25 125 75
No. of
Initiative
s
No. of Initiatives
Taken and
Implemented in
last six months (
assessment
period)
25% 25 125 25
Inputs
Investment in Rs
10%
5 25 5
No. of Peopleresponsible for
delivering
5 25 5
Output
/Result
Financial gains
in Rs 40% 20 100 20
Page 14
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 14/69
s Enhancement in
customer service10 50 10
Process
Improvement10 50 10
TOTAL 100% 100 500 150
2.2- Cr iteria:
Initiative
Score Definition
3 Responsibility given by superior in addition to defined job
role.
4 Initiative taken by individual as part of small group.
5 Initiative completely taken by self
No. of Initiatives
Score No. of Initiatives Taken & Implemented in Last 6months
1 2 nos
2 3 nos
3 4 nos
4 5 nos
5 More than 5nos
Investment (in Rs. )
Score Definition
Page 15
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 15/69
1 Above 5 lacs
2 3.5 lacs to 5lacs
3 2.1 lacs to 3.5 lacs
4 1.1 lac to 2 lacs
5 Below 1 lac
Note : Manpower cost invested shall also be included.
No. of Persons responsible for delivering
Score Definition
1 more than 5
2 4
3 3
4 2
5 1
Financial gains in Rs. Per year
Score Definition
1 Less than 2 lacs / year
2 2 lacs to 4 lacs /year
3 4 to 6 lacs /year
4 6 to 8 lacs /year
5 8 lacs and above / year
Page 16
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 16/69
Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.
Business / Function Specific Parameter for Enhancement in customer service eg :
reduction of Waiting time, cycle time, Complaints ,Defect, Turn Around Time
Score Definition
1 Poor
2 Average
3 Good
4 Very Good
5 Excellent
The Platinum Star Award:
The Platinum Star Achievement Award - To recognize outstanding and original unique contributions
by an individual or a team (not more than 3 people) beyond the defined job role, which resulted in
increasing the net income of its business or caused business growth through successful introduction of
new products/ processes / practices/ new business/customers and major functional accomplishmentsand critical accomplishments that far exceed the set objectives and have a considerable financial
impact on the business. The accomplishment shall be a major and critical one that far exceeds the set
objectives .
Table 3.1
Evaluation Parameters - The Platinum Star A chievement Award
Parameter
CategoryParameter
Overall
WeightageWeightage Score
TotalScore(W*S)
Max.
score
Min
Score
Page 17
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 17/69
Initiative
Initiativetaken beyonddefined jobrole
15% 15 75 45
Inputs
Investment in
Rs
15%
5 25 5
Time Frame
from Idea to
Implementatio
n
5 25 5
No. of Persons
involved
5 25 5
Output/R
esults
Financial
gains in Rs70% 70 350 70
TOTAL 100% 100 500 130
3.2- Cr iteria:
Initiative
Score Definition
3Responsibility given by superior in addition to defined job
role.
4 Initiative taken by individual as part of small group.
5 Initiative completely taken by self
Investment (in Rs. )
Score Definition
Page 18
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 18/69
1 Above 12 lacs
2 8.1 lacs to 12lacs
3 5.1 lacs to 8 lacs
4 3.1 lac to 5 lacs
5 Below 3 lacs
Note: Manpower cost invested shall also be included.
Time Frame for Design, Development and Implementation( In terms of Man Hrs. / Man days)
Score Definition
1 1 year and above
2 10 months to 12 months
3 8 months to 10 months
4 6 months to 8 months
5 6 months and below
No. of Persons responsible for delivering
Score Definition
1 more than 5
2 4
3 3
4 2
5 1
Page 19
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 19/69
Financial gains in Rs. Per year
Score Definition
1 10 lacs to 20 lacs / year
2 20 lacs to 30 lacs /year
3 30 to 40 lacs /year
4 40lacs to 50 lacs / year
5 50 lacs and above / year
Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.
Commendation Certificates:
Objective: To recognize the exemplary contributions of the nominations which does not qualify for theaward in the Golden or Platinum recognition category or completely fit in the existing frame work of
the rewards and recognition policy but are worth of being acknowledged and recognized by the
organization. The contribution needs to be at a higher level than the one which calls for recognition
under the Individual Level or Silver Level.
Type of Award: Individual and Team award.
Number of Awards: There shall not be any ceiling on the number of certificates to be given in this
category. All the employees who are selected by the committee shall receive the certificates.
Periodicity: Annual .
Page 20
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 20/69
Chapter 2
Executive summary
In spite of theoretical knowledge gained through classroom study, a person is incomplete if not
subjected to practical exposure of real corporate world and the challenges and problems that one has to
face at the actual work place.
In this context the study has been taken to make the person aware of happening of the real business
world. The project entitled BENCHMARKING SURVEY OF REWARDS AND RECOGNITION
with the special reference to RELIANCE INFRALIMITED has been done in Mumbai as a summer training part of MBA program and it helped me in
understanding about the policies and procedures of a company and how these should be formulate
together so that they solve the real purpose. It also gave me a chance to have an interaction with
people at real workplace who are working at different positions with different authorities and
responsibilities.
The generosity & the patience of these people for spending their valuable time for having discussions
and interactions has also been a rich experience for me.
The study was made to formulate a manual by collecting relevant information about the contents with
the help of Questionnaire survey and face to face interaction with the HR MANAGERS & HR
OFFICERS of 9 other companies as well as from the valuable information & suggestions provided by
the members of R-INFRA itself. Secondary data was collected from the other manuals provided by the
HR department and website of the company.
The final outcome of the study is various schemes of rewards and recognitions for staff and officers of
R-INFRA, which will help them in getting motivated and improvising their performances at work
place.
Page 21
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 21/69
Page 22
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 22/69
of electricity from our power stations. Our transmission division is developing 5 transmission projects,
with total project outlay of Rs 6,640 crore (US$ 1.4 billion).
Infrastructure:
RInfra has a significant presence in the construction of roads, metros, airports and real estate.
Infrastructure is decidedly the most visible and important form of development in a nation. RInfra
signify this with 11 road projects of 970 kms worth about Rs 12,000 crore (US$ 2.6 billion). We are
currently implementing 3 metro rail projects in Mumbai and Delhi worth around Rs 16,000 crore (US$
3.4 billion).In the real estate space, they are in various stages of bidding/negotiation/planning with
over 400 million sq. feet of mixed use built up potential.
VisionTo be amongst the most admired and most trusted integrated utility companies in the world, delivering
reliable and quality products and services to all customers at competitive costs, with international
standards of customer care- thereby creating superior value for all stakeholders.
To set new benchmarks in standards of corporate performance and governance through the pursuit of
operational and financial excellence, responsible citizenship and profitable growth.
Mission
To attain global best practices and become a world-class utility.
To create world-class assets and infrastructure to provide the platform for faster, consistent growth for
India to become a major world economic power.
To achieve excellence in service, quality, reliability, safety and customer care.
To earn the trust and confidence of all customers and stakeholders, exceeding their expectations and
make the Company a respected household name.
To work with vigor, dedication and innovation with total customer satisfaction as the ultimate goal.
To consistently achieve high growth with the highest levels of productivity.
To be a technology driven, efficient and financially sound organisation.
To be a responsible corporate citizen nurturing human values and concern for society, the environment
and above all people.
To contribute towards community development and nation building.
Page 23
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 23/69
To promote a work culture that fosters individual growth, team spirit and creativity to overcome
challenges and attain goals.
To encourage ideas, talent and value systems.
To uphold the guiding principles of trust, integrity and transparency in all aspects of interactions and
dealings.
Awards
Efforts, Recognition, Awards
The company has continuously been recognized with numerous awards of national and international
repute.
Environmental Awards 2006 - Greentech Award for Environmental Excellence" for the year 2006
2005 - Greentech Award for Environmental Excellence" for the year 2004-2005
2001 - Indo-German Award for Environmental Excellence" by Greentech Foundation
2000 - Indo-German Award for Environmental Excellence" by Greentech Foundation
2000 - Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) Award.
2000 - Millennium Business Award for Environmental Achievement" by United Nations (UN) and
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) at BUDAPEST.
1999 - Environment Performance Award" by Council of Power Utilities (CPU ) as a part of Thermal
Centenary Celebration-1999.
1998 - The G-51 Millennium Award in the field of Mother Earth protection.
1998 - Dr.R.J.Rathi Environmental Award.
1997 - International Greenland Society National Award.
Safety Awards
2006 - NSC- Maharastra Chapter - Safety Awards - 2005 for "Lowest Accident frequency rate" during
the year 2005
2005 - NSC - Maharashtra Chapter - Safety Awards - 2004
2004 - Four Stars" Ranking by British Safety Council, UK for Occupational Health and Safety
Management System.
2004 - National Safety Council-Maharashtra Chapter.
Page 24
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 24/69
2004 - National Safety Award-2003" by Govt. of India.
2001 - Safety Award-2001- Yogyata Pramanpatra" by "National Safety Council of India" for good
performance in OSH for 1998 to 2000
1999 - National Safety Council-Maharashtra Chapter" for longest accident free period during 1999
. For longest accident free period and
. For lowest accident frequency
Operational Performance Awards
2006 - 2006 - International Quality Crown Award (IQC Award) in Gold Category" by Business
Initiative Directions (BID), Spain.
2006 - CII - National Award for Excellence in Energy Management" for 2006 - by Confederation of
Indian Industry(C I I ).
2006 - First Prize - National Award for Meritorious Performance by Central Electricity Authority(CEA), Govt. of India for its Excellent PERFORMANCE amongst Indian Thermal Power Plants in the
year 2004-05.
2005 - Maharastra Energy Development Agency (MEDA) Award for Excellence in Energy
Conservation & Management in Thermal Power Station sector for the year 2005.
2005 - Vishwakarma Rashtriya Purasakar - 2004 (Eight Employees) - by Ministry of Labour and
Employment., Govt. of India,
2005 - CII - National Award for excellence in Water Management" for 2005 - by Confederation of
Indian Industry(C I I )
2004 - Reliance Energy was presented the prestigious "QIMPRO Benchmark 2004" award by the
QIMPRO Foundation in the "Service Category" on the basis of its performance in 15 parameters
including attributes such as Leadership, Strategic planning, Communication, Quality Management
System, and Customer Interaction Management, among others - by QIMPRO Foundation.
2004 - Dahanu TPS was named as one of the world’s to p 12 power plants of 2004 by Platts Power
Magazine, in its July/August 2004 edition based on several selection criteria such as operational
efficiency, minimal environmental impact, technology use, financing structure, etc.
Page 25
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 25/69
Chapter 4
Scope of Project Work
This study helps to have access to the company for conducting any further research. This study
helps to gain knowledge about the topic and also facilitates study of the various related aspects. The study is also helpful in finding out the respond ents’ opinion towards certain attributes
It is also helpful in finding out the importance of an effective rewards system in attracting and
retaining the best performers.
Through this study we come to know about the various rewards schemes that are used by the
companies and also the current trends in the schemes.
The study also helps in finding out the views of the employee about the current schemes of the
Organization.
It gives an idea about the reward and the various factors associated with it which are rewarded.
Page 26
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 26/69
Chapter 5
Objective of the Study
The working force of a company plays a significant role in the continuous progress of the company.
Hence it is essential to keep them motivated and keep their spirits high.The broad objective of the project was to study the recent trends in the rewards and recognition policy
in different companies and suggest changes (if any) in the current rewards policy of Reliance. This is
important to improve their performance and efficiency.
The schemes prepared are prepared keeping various important things in mind like: the employee
class, tenure of the schemes (monthly, quarterly etc.),the criterion of judgment etc.
The target employees are the ones working within Reliance Infra, Mumbai.
The numbers of employees are approximately 110. These employees are at the officers and the staff
level .The criterion followed for measuring these schemes are: performances, creativity/ innovation,
potential etc.
Therefore in order to have a deep knowledge and understanding about what should constitute the
Reward and Recognition schemes for the working force, a study was conducted (with the help of
questionnaires) in 10 other companies, which is well known as benchmarking
So the overall/primary objective was to suggest any changes in the Reward and Recognition
Scheme of the company so as to enhance the current policies.
Page 27
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 27/69
Chapter 6
Methodology
Research design : Research Design refers to "framework or plan for a study that guides the collection and analysis of
data". A typical research design of a company basically tries to resolve the following issues:
a) Determining Data Collection Design
b) Determining Data Methods
c) Determining Data Sources
d) Determining Primary Data Collection Methods
e) Developing Questionnaires
f) Determining Sampling Plan
(1) Explorative Research Design:
Explorative studies are undertaken with a view to know more about the problem. These studies help in
a proper definition of the problem, and development of specific hypothesis is to be tested later by
more conclusive research designs. Its basic purpose is to identify factors underlying a problem and to
determine which one of them need to be further researched by using rigorous conclusive research
designs.
(2) Conclusive Research Design:
Conclusive Research Studies are more formal in nature and are conducted with a view to eliciting
more precise information for purpose of making marketing decisions.
These studies can be either:
a) Descriptive or
b) ExperimentalThus, it was mix of both the tools of Research Design that is, Explorative as well as Conclusive
Sample Size:
10 companies
Page 28
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 28/69
Data Collection :
Data Sources :
Secondary Data – Internet, books and company manual
Primary Data through Questionnaire
Contact Method
Personal Interaction
Through e-mail
Page 29
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 29/69
Chapter 7
Observation and analysis
COMPANIES STUDIED FOR BENCHMARKING:
Companies from similar sector
HCC
L&T
Companies from other sector
ONGC
TATA MOTORS
NTPC
GODREJ
ACCENTURE
GLAXSOSMITHKLINE
HSBC
Page 30
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 30/69
HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Awards Objecti
ve
Applica
bility
Criteria Reward Periodi
city
Platfor
m
Process Remarks
ATTENDAN
CE AWARD
consist
ent
attenda
nce
All
Employe
e
Not a
single
leave
except
PL
Rs 1000/-
as cash and
a certificate
Annual HCC
day
(Diwa
li
Functi
on)
HR
finalises
on
attendanc
e record
system
Not
followed
in R-
Inf ra
MISCELLA
NEOUS
AWARD
Rewar
d and
recogni
ze the
employ
ees
abovetheir
tenure
All
employe
e
Contrib
ution
should
be
beyond
mere
appreciation
letter.
Training
sessions
Cash prize
Cash
vouchers
Free
holidaysPromotions
(at times)
Increments
in salary
etc.
Annual HCC
day
(Diwa
li
Functi
on)
Nominati
on
invited
online
and
approved
by acommitte
e through
rigorous
screening
.
Followed
at R-Infra
Page 31
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 31/69
HCC
Merits
1. The awards are not confined to a particular frame.
2. All the employees get an equal chance to do a presentation. This reduces ambiguity
3. Primary selection is done on the complete discretion of the panel who takes the final call.
Demerits
1. There is a lack of transparency.
2. The nominations cannot be done for a specific category of award. The nominations are generic. The
panel fits the employee into a category they think he is best suited for.
3. The scale of evaluation is not known.
Page 32
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 32/69
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
Awards Objective Applicabil
ity
Criteria Reward Periodici
ty
Process Remarks
BEST
ATTEND
ANCE
AWARD
Consistent
attendance
All
employee
Not a
single
leave
except PL
Rs 1000/-
as cash
and a
certificate
Annual HR finalises
on attendance
record system
Not
followed
at R-
Inf ra
LONG
SERVICEAWARD
S
To
recognisehonour
and
loyalty
All
employee
Employee
whocompleted
above 20
years
Gifts such
as watchescoupons
silver
trophy
based on
tenure
Annual Decided by
HR based onthe tenure of
employee
Not
followed
at R-
Inf ra
SUGGES
TIONSCHEME
To
recognisecreative
and
innovative
ideas
All
employee
Safety
Customer delight,
Cost /
Productivi
ty,
Timeliness
, Creative,
problem
solving
The award
winnersare given
some
monetary
reward in
accordanc
e to the
outcome
of their
ideas and
certificate
Not
mentioned
Separate
panelconsisting of
GM and
above
designation
that evaluates
the
nominations
and decides
upon the
recipients of
the award.
Followed
at R-Infra
Page 33
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 33/69
L & T
Merits
1. There is no ceiling on the number of employees applicable for the awards amongst all the awards
listed above. All the employees at least see their self-receiving the above award at some or the other
time during their work tenure. Majority of the people feel a part of the group. This kind of
applicability influences majority of the crowd. The employees feel motivated and have a sense of
engagement with the organization.
2. When the consistent attendance of the employees is recognized and rewarded, they feel valued by the
organization which in turn would create a sense of belongingness within the employees for the
organization. The types of awards clearly reflect that the organization respects and rewards the loyalty
of the employees. The organization values time and preserves discipline.
3. The suggestions are invited from all the level of the organization ranging from top to the bottom level.
This gives a feeling of sense of consideration among the employees . it avoids discrimination and
gives encouragement. Usually the suggestions are encouraged only from the top level.
4. A team can also be awarded for suggestion scheme category. Motivating team performance helps to
increase the productivity of the company. A cumulative performance matters a lot to the organization.
DemeritsThe awards seem to be generic in nature which caters to a large group. It is good to recognize large
population, but elite group recognition is also necessary which is missing in L & T.
The longevity of the “Long Service Award” starts from 20 years. This may be too long to st art with.
People working in this organization for above 10 years and below 20 years may feel left out
considering the business of the organization. This may create a sense of disappointment within certain
employees.
Page 34
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 34/69
TATA MOTORS
Awards Objective Applicab
ility
Criteria Reward Periodici
ty
Platform Process Remarks
SUGGE
STOR
OF THE
DAY
To obtain
new and
better
ideas form
employee
All the
employe
es below
the level
of a
manager.
Quality
Cost
Reducti
on
Safety
etc.
Rs 200/-
for the
idea and
vary for
implement
ation of
the idea.
monthly On the
floor, in
front of
all the
employe
es
Employe
e is
evaluate
d by the
Manager
Not
followed
in R-
Inf ra
EMPLO
YEE OF
THE
MONTH
To reward
good
performan
ce
All the
employe
es.
Effectiv
e
perform
ance
Award Rs
1000/- as
cash.
monthly In the
morning
meetings
.
The HR
departme
nt does
the
facilitati
on
Not
followed
in R-
Inf ra
SELF
DIRECT
ED
TEAM(SDT)
OF THE
MONTH
To
appreciate
good team
performance
All the
workmen
who are
supervised by
facilitato
rs
Perfor
mance
of the
team
Certificate
trophy and
learning
sessions
monthly In the
morning
meetings
.
Nominati
ons send
by the
Functional
Heads/H
OD/Proc
essing
Not
consider
ed for
suggestion
Page 35
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 35/69
Unit
Head are
evaluate
d by a
panel of
4 judges
AWARD
FOR
EXEMP
LARY
WORK
Appreciat
e work
done over
and above
the job.
All the
employe
es
Fire
fighting
Social
cause
Accide
ntPrevent
ion etc.
Name
displayed
on the
intranet
and
internalmagazine.
As per
occurren
ces of act
Morning
meetings
. Intranet
&
Internal
Magazine
The
Plant
Head
takes the
decision
on theannounc
ement
and
mode of
the
recogniti
on.
Not
consider
ed for
suggestio
n
FULL
ATTEN
DANCE
DURIN
G THE
YEAR
Consistent
attendance
All the
employe
es
Not a
single
leave
except
PL
Cash Prize
of Rs
4000.
Annual No
formal
platform
Data is
extracted
from the
system
Not
followed
at R-
Inf ra
Page 36
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 36/69
TATA Motors
Merits
1. The reward and recognition practice of Tata Motors seems to encompass whole lot of categories
of awards. Consideration of individual as well as team efforts is appreciable.
2. The award categories cater for a larger population which is commendable.
3. The frequency of awards is well in place ranging from a day award to monthly award to
quarterly till the year which helps to keep the employee’s on a high morale.
4. Immediate recognition frequency of efforts contributed is high.
5. The organizations also seems to value discipline and consistency which can be seen in the award
category named “ Award for full attendance during the year”
6. The awards are not confined to any particular boundaries. All sorts of contributions can be
considered for nomination.
Demerits
1. It can be noted that there is not much scope for executive category to receive an award though
there is a wide range of award category.
2. The recognition to the employees in the award category “Award for Exemplary Performance”
does not seem to be lucrative. Better options like a cash award or a trophy could prove to be of
worth to the employees.
3. The awards seem to be confined to the job role of the employees.
Page 37
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 37/69
NTPC
Awards Objective
Applicability
Criteria Reward Periodicity
Platfor m
Process Remarks
APPRECIATIONLETTER
To placeon recordgoodwork done byan
employee/groupof employees
Allemployees up tothe levelof E7
Good performance
Appreciation letter highlighting thecontribution/instance
Asfrequently as
possible
Noformal
platfor m
The sectionor departmentthat wantstoappreciate
the goodwork done
by itsemployee(s)may presenta letter of appreciationin case of amember of a Team,
FollowedAt R-Infra
STAR OF
THEMONTH
To
recognizeconsistent goodwork done bytheemployees.
All non-
executives
Non-
Executive,whohasshownconsistent
punctuality,discipline,
team playingetc.
A small
Star of themonthBadge,name and
photo of theemployeeon notice
board.
Monthl
y
No
formal platfor m
concerned
Head of thedepartmentshallevaluate therecommendationsreceivedfrom thereportingofficer andselects the
bestemployee
Not
followed at R- Inf ra
Page 38
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 38/69
EMPLOYEE OFTHEYEAR
Torecognize andrewardexemplar
y performance for creatingrolemodelsand a
performanceculture.
Non-Executives
Non-Executives,whohave
got aminimum of two“STAR of themonth”awardsandfour “Appre
ciationLetter s”in ayear
Gift of upto Rs.2000/- andletter of appreciati
onconferringon them“Arun /Abha of the Unit”
Annual Allnominationsof eligibleemployeesreceived
from eachdepartmentwill beevaluated
by acommitteeof fiveHODs.
Not followed at R- Inf ra
VIDHYUTAWARDS
Torecognize &rewardmeritorious Nonexecutiv
eemployees
Theentriesfor Shramawardssubmitted to
Govt. of India, but werenotawarded.
Such of thoseentries,whichdid notgetShram
Award,would beconsidered for thisaward.
Letter of appreciation under thesignatureof Director
(HR) andCashRewardupto15,000
Annual thecommitteeconsistingof CorporateOS, HR & Finance
whoevaluatesthenominationssent for Shramaward
Notfollowedat R-Infra.
Notrecommended
POWER EXCELAWARDS
Torecognizeexcellenc
e indischargingofficialduties &demonstr ation of
NTPC
Allexecutives uptoE6,
excluding HODs
Innovationsandimprov
ementsin areaof work Contributiontowardsgroupeffortsa
Letter of appreciation under the
signatureof BHU/GMCashreward of 5,000 andtranning inIndia
Annual nominationsmade byHODs. Thecommittee
wouldevaluate allthenominations
based on thecriteria.
Followedat R-Infradifferentl
y
Page 39
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 39/69
corevalues
nddemonstratingcorevalues
atwork.
PEARLAWARDS(PerformanceExcellence AwardFor RegionalLeadershi
p
Torecogniseexcellence inleadershi
p &demonstr ation of
NTPCcorevalues
AllHODsand E7& E7Aat units&RegioanlHqrs andatCC.(ExcludingHead of Project /Station)
Leadershipqualities,excellence inhis areaof responsibilitie,demonstrationof corevalues,creativity,innovation, etc.
Tranningupto 10days inIndia Cashrewardupto10,000andappreciation letter signed byconcernedED.
Annual Committeeconsistingof ED of the regionand allBUH of the regionwouldevaluatethenominations
Not followed at R- Inf ra .
ACEAWARDS (Awardsfor corporateexcellence)
Torecognizeexcellence inleadershi
p &demonstr ation of
NTPCCoreValues
AllHeads of Project/Stations,GMs inRegionsandCorporate Centre
Excellence inStrategicLeadershipinnovation,creativity,knowledgemanagement
Letter of Appreciation to be
presentedin ECM
byCMD/Specialfunctionsin Delhi,tranningof 7 days,Cash prizeof 15,000
Annual Acommitteeof FunctionalDirectorswith CMDasChairpersonwillevaluate thenominations
Not followed at R- Infra.
MANVEEYATAPURASK AR
Torecognise goodvaluesexhibited
by
Allemployees uptoE7 areeligiblefor this
Shouldhaveexhibited anexemplary
Appreciation letter and a cash
prize upto1000/-
Doneimmediatelyuponnoticing such
Recommended by thesenior
person.
Not followed at R- Inf ra .
Page 40
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 40/69
employees inofficial& sociallife.
award. Value behaviour
NTPC
Merits
1. The award categories cater to executive as well as non-executive class.
2. There is a clear bifurcation of individual and group awards.
3. The Reward and recognition practice seems to be highly structured.
4. The rewards given to the employees come across as lucrative awards.
5. There is a uniform distribution of awards across various businesses.
Demerits
1. Due to a highly structured policy, the implementation and processing may take time.
2. Collogue to collogue recognition is lacking .
Page 41
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 41/69
GODREJ
Awards Objectiv
e
Applicabil
ity
Criteria Reward Periodici
ty
Platform Process Remark
s
R.E.A.P
(RECO
GNITIO
N FOR
EXCEL
LENCE&
APPRE
CIATIO
N IN
PRIMA)
To create
an
environ
ment /
culture
of commit
ment and
engagem
ent
towards
the
company
.
All the
employees
on
company
pay roll
Innovati
ve,
creativity
,
customer
orientation ,
process
orientati
on, etc.
A
personalised
letter of
appreciation
from the
H.R. Head& Sodexo
meal
voucher of
Rs 1000/-
winner’s
name &
picture
displayed in
their
respective
work place.
Monthly On the
floor in
front of
all the
other
employees.
Nominatio
ns are sent
via e-mail
by 10th of
next
month tothe HR at
the HO
(Mumbai).
Follow
ed at R-
Infra
(annual
)
Page 42
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 42/69
GODREJ
Merits
1. There is no structured framework about the rewards and recognition practise. Exception in work done
can be easily identified without any boundaries.
2. There is a lot of scope for participation in the nomination the reason being, there is no strict format.
This would improve employee engagement to a great extent.
Demerits
1. The rewards and recognition practice is highly unstructured. There are no specifications.
2. The evaluation and selection is highly subjective. The transparency may be questioned.
3. The absence of tenure awards shows a lack of mass appeal.
Page 43
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 43/69
ACCENTURE
Global AwardsAwards Objective Applic
abilityCriteria Reward Periodic
ityPlatform Process Remarks
CELEBR ATINGPERFOR MANCEAWARD
Toformallyandinstantlyrecognizehigh
performance whenithappens-any dayany time,
All theemployees
Demonstrated
performance asdescribed in
Accenture’s
performancefactors.
credit pointswhichcan beredeemed for
differenttypes of gifts as
per thewish of anemployee.(min25, max1000)
Anytimeas per
performance
No formal platform
The immediatesupervisor onthe performancedelivered by hisimmediatesubordinate
would take adecision to allotthese points tohis subordinates.
Followed atR-Infrathoughdifferently
ABOVE&
BEYONDAWARD
Aimed atrecognizi
ngindividuals whosework,commitment andenthusiasm lead tooutstandingcontribution
All theemploy
ees
Employees in
thiscasehavegonetheextramile tocontribute over andabovetheir
area of work impacthave
performed in anexemplarymanner.
Eachsenior
manager hascertain
budgetout of which hecanrewardtheemployee in formof Cash,
giftvoucher
Quarterly
There isno
particular platformfor thisaward
Senior Managers in
India Businesscan award toany employees.
Followed atR-Infra
thoughdifferently
Page 44
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 44/69
PEOPLEDEVELOPER AWARD
Rewardandrecogniseemployee/s whohave
beendeveloping peoplewithinthesystem/or ganization/company.
All theemployees
Leader,guide,connectto
peoplewell,
personalitydevelopment,work life
balance,etc.
Congratulationsmail.Giftvoucher worthRs.40000 for senior manager s. 1000CP for non-executive
Quarterly
QuarterlyAwardfunctions
Every employeecan nominatehimself as wellas any of hiscolleagues for this award. TheHR keeps atrack of thenominations andis responsible toget approvalsfrom the Senior Managers for the nominations.
Local AwardsPRACTI
TIONAR OF THEYEAR
To
recognizesupplychainmanagement
practitioners whohavedisplayedexceptional
performa
nce.
All the
employees inSupplyChainManagement.
Excepti
onal performance intheareasof:Valuecreator Peopledeveloper Busines
soperator Contributedsignificantly totheserviceline
Cash
prize
Quarte
rly
Quar
terlyAwardfunctions
Not known Not considered for
suggestion
TENUER AWARD
Torecognizeand
honour theloyalty of theemployees
All theemployees in
thecompany
Employees whohave
completedabove 5years intheorganization.
Receivegiftvoucher
up to10,000depending onthetenureof their service.
Quarterly
Quar terlyheld
AwardFunctions
HR departmentmakes the
selectiondependingon the datathey have.
Not f ollowed at R- In f ra .
Page 45
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 45/69
Accenture
Merits
1. There is an existence of collogue to collogue recognition in one of the award categories.
2. All the employees are applicable for most of the award categories.
3. The rewards are in the form of points which gives the employees a flexibility to redeem the
points online for some gifts at the convenience of the rewardee.
4. There persists high range of flexibility in the periodicity.
5. The existence of tenure award reflects that the company considers the loyalty and discipline of
the employees.
6. The process seems to be structured for some of the awards.
Demerits
1. There seems to be a lot of ambiguity in the process of evaluation. Transparency is what is
lacking.
2. The distribution of points can be questionable.
Page 46
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 46/69
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Awards Objective Applicability
Criteria Reward Periodicity
Process Remarks
BRAVOCARD
To recognisethe supportan employeereceives for his senior or
peers for completion of assignment.
All theemployees
Theemployeegives a“BravoCard” tothecolleaguein person
or via e-mail.
Anytime
Whenever anyemployee feelsfor recognisinghis/her colleagues for their effort/support, s/hemay fill the
card.
Followedat R-Infra.
SITEAWARD
Outstanding performancesdelivered bytheemployees(individual &team) on thework siteover a
particular project
All theemployees atwork site.
The siteshould be
particularly
benefited by thework.
Cash of upto 2000for individualand 10000for team +Certificate
Biannual
Can benominated bythe project team,superiors or individualsthemselves.Approval,evaluation andthe final call is
taken by panelconsisting of theDepartmentHead, HR Headand the SiteHead
Followedat R-Infradifferently.
WORK AREAAWARD
To recognisework done bytheemployees atfunctional
anddepartmentallevel.
All theemployees
Theexemplarywork doneshould
benefit the
department/function.
Cash +CertificatesIndividual:
Rs500/eachTeam: Rs2000
Biannual
Nominated bysuperior throughintranet.Approval,evaluation and
the final call istaken by panelconsisting of theDepartmentHead, HR Headand the SiteHead
Notfollowedat R-Infra.
Not
consider ed for suggestion.
Page 47
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 47/69
DIVISIO
NALAWARD
To recognisethe bestoutcome of the projectsmainly in
case of anyinventions.
Projectsof all the
businesses acrossGlaxoSm
ithKline
Customer delightCost /Productivity
TimelinessCreative problemsolving,SafetyInventions, etc.
Cash +CertificatesIndividual:Rs 5000
Team: Rs40,000
Biannual
Divisional headnominates a
person. The HR collates andsends
nominationsoverseas for theapproval andevaluation. Thefinal call istaken by acommittee.
Followedat R-Infradifferently.
PRESIDE NT ROLEOFHONOU
R
recognizeoutstandingwork/task done by any
employee/team that has proven to beof the biggestadvantage tothe company
All theemployees
There areno specific
parameterslisted for
this award.
Cash +CertificatesIndividual:
Rs 10,000Team: Rs75000
Annual Nominated bysuperior approved byDept. head that
send it to HR.Which is thensend by HR overseas for approval
Not followed at R- Inf ra .
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Merits
4. Presenting “Bravo Card” is an excellent tool to promote collogues to collogues recognition. This is a
kind of instant recognition that shots up the motivation of an employee on the spot.
5. Identification of individual as well as team awards encourages people to work individually as well as
in teams.
6. The recognition is done at various levels be it site or divisional level. The award policy has been
formed by taking hierarchy into consideration to avoid injustice.
7. Huge amount of cash is involved as a reward. Money is always a good motivator.
Demerits
1. There is no methodology for smaller contribution. Minute contributions are not covered.
2. All the awards except “Bravo Card” require a bigger platform to honor. There is no such award
category to recognize and reward smaller contribution which require smaller platform.
Page 48
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 48/69
HSBC
Awards
Objective
Applicability
Criteria Reward Periodicity
Platform Process Remark s
THANKSAWARDPROGRAMME
Torecognisecreative andinnovativeideas
whichwhenimplemented byanemployee
beyond hisdefine
d jobrole
Applicable toall theemployeesworking in theClient
ManagementUnitexceptfor theHeadof theUnitand theSenior VP.
Implementationof complex dealsinquicker times.
Achievementinmanagementrelationexcellence.Customer feedbac
k Excellentsolution
Individual:Rs 2500/-eachTeam: Rs50,000/-Theamount isgiven in 2
forms:1. Sodexogiftvoucher.2. Amountdirectlycredited totheemployee’s creditcard
Quarterly
Theemployeesare awardedin a formalawardfunctionthat is heldat a five star
hotel withinthe city.
Nomination by superior or by theindividualthemselves.The approval,evaluationand the final
call is taken by theBusinessHead/ UnitHead.
Followed at R-Infradifferently.
Comments:
This is the one and only award category which is practiced at this bank in this particular unit which is
called the Client Management unit.
The HR allocates the budget to the unit and gives a framework to operate.There are individual awards as well as team awards which are given on quarterly basis in the whole
year.
5 individual awards and 2 team awards are given in every quarter.
Page 49
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 49/69
Merits
1. Their existence of team and individual awards shows that the organization recognizes individual
as well as team awards.
2. The awards are very lucrative.
3. The periodicity of the awards is substantial.
Demerits
1. There is no peer recognition.
2. There doesn’t seem to be a scope for smaller recognition.
3. Recognition for loyalty, discipline and consistency is missing.
4. A small population will be recognized and impacted.
Page 50
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 50/69
Chapter 8
Suggestion
Policy made easy to understand
Timely reminders to present the “Thank You” slips
Awards for small contributions
Introduce “On the Floor Awards”
A survey to be done among the employees of the company to know the level
of satisfaction of the policy
Employee to choose their reward and the way Celebrate years of service award.
Introduce informal type of rewards.
Page 51
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 51/69
Page 52
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 52/69
Chapter 10
Bibliography
Books:
Company manual 1001 ways to reward and recognize your employee
By: Bob Nelson
Websites:
www.rinfra.com
www.citehr.com
www.scibd.com
Page 53
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 53/69
Chapter 9
Annexure
Questionnaire: Rewards & Recognition
Name of the Company:
Location:
Designation:
Department:
Number of Employees:
Various other locations:
Number of years in business:
1. What kind of Reward policy is implemented in your organization?
· Formal
· Informal
2. What are various rewards provided by your company?
3. What are the objectives of the various rewards provided?
4. To whom are the rewards applicable?
5. What are the criteria considered while nominating a person for the reward?
6. Who evaluates the person for the award?
5. What percentage of revenue is earmarked for the reward in the financial year?
6. In which form do you provide the reward?
Page 54
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 54/69
7. What is the periodicity of the reward?
8. What is the platform for the reward?
9. What is the procedure followed for nominating a person for the reward?
10. The Reward system in your organization is
· Monetary
· Non-monetary
· Both
11. What are the behaviors that you are trying to encourage in your employees?
12. How frequently do you bring changes in the Reward system practiced in the organization?
13. Are the employee suggestions considered while reviewing the Reward program?
· Yes
· No
14. What one features of your company’s rewards program makes it most successful? Why?
15. What is the upper and lower limit in case of monetary rewards for recognition?
16. What is the approximate value of the non-monetary rewards given by your organization?
Page 55
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 55/69
NOMINATION FORM FOR
“PARADIGM SHIFT TROPHY ” (Note: Please type the descriptive part in Word Document only & then take a print of the form for filling up
the objective part and for the signatures)
Name of the Nominee: Employee no:
Grade: Department:
Function/Business: Location:
Achievement Period: Date of Application:
1. Please describe the nominee’s accomplishments in the space below(This should be presented as a speaking statement incorporating facts and exhibiting total objectivity andtransparency in the analysis so presented)
2. Please explain how the idea is unique and innovative. Explain w.r.t the following:
1) Never been implemented in Our Organization.2) Never been implemented in any similar industry across the Country3) Never been implemented in any similar industry across the world.4) Never been implemented in any industry across the Country5) Never been implemented in any industry across the world
2. a. Give substantial data and information for the option selected above
Page 56
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 56/69
3. What have been the inputs for the implementation of the idea?(Give quantified data in terms of the investment, time taken from design to implementation and the no. of people involved)
3. a. Investment in Rs. (Note: Manpower cost invested shall also be included.)
1) 5 lacs and above2) Between 3.5 lacs to 5 lacs3) Between 2.1 lacs to 3.5 lacs4) Between 1.1 lacs to 2 lacs5) Below 1 lac
3. b.Time Frame for Design, Development and Implementation (In terms of Man Hrs / Man days)
1) 1 year and above
2) 10 months to 12 months3) 8 months to 10 months4) 6 months to 8 months5) 6 months and below
3. c. No. of Persons responsible for delivering
1) more than 52) 43) 3
4) 25) 1
3. d. Additional data or comments
Page 57
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 57/69
4. Please mention the Benefits for the company (Give quantified data in terms of financial gains, reduction of lead time / errors / turn around time)
4. a. Financial gains in Rs. (Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.)
1) Less than 2 lacs / year 2) 2 lacs to 4 lacs /year 3) 4 to 6 lacs /year 4) 6 to 8 lacs /year 5) 8 lacs and above / year
4. b. Please state any Business / Function Specific Parameter w.r.t. Enhancement in customer service due to the accomplishment.
Parameter: Reduction of Waiting time, cycle time, Complaints, Defect, Turn Around Time (or if anyother please specify _____________________________________)
1) Poor 2) Average3) Good4) Very Good5) Excellent
4. c. Please state any Business / Function Specific Parameter w.r.t. Process Improvement due tothe accomplishment.
Parameter: Reduction of cycle time, Errors or Turn around Time (or if any other please specify _____________________________________)
1) Poor 2) Average3) Good4) Very Good5) Excellent
Page 58
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 58/69
4. d. Additional data or comments
Any other Remarks:
Detai ls of Enclosures / Support in g docum ents / At tachm ent proofs sent :
Sr.
no.
Name of the
Document
Description of the Document No.
Page 59
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 59/69
Recommended by (Immediate Superior of the employee or by any Executive from the Customer Department) :
Immediate Superior
1. Name : Signature:
Customer Department (If Any):
2. Name: Signature:
Approved by (Divisional Head/Project Head/Plant Head /Functional Head):
HOD of Nominee’s Dept:
1. Name: Signature:
HOD of Customer Dept (If Any):
2. Name: Signature:
Page 60
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 60/69
NOMINATION FORM FOR
“THE PLATINUM STAR ACHIEVEMENT AWARD ”
(Note: Please type the descriptive part in Word Document only & then take a print of the form for filling up
the objective part and for the signatures)
Name of the Nominee: Employee no:
Grade: Department:
Function/Business: Location:
Achievement Period: Date of Application:
1. Please describe all the accomplishments made by the nominee in the space below.
1. a. Initiative
1 Responsibility given by superior in addition to defined job role.
2 Initiative taken by individual as part of small group.
3 Initiative completely taken by self
2. What have been the inputs for the accomplishment?(Give quantified data in terms of the investment, time taken for implementation and the no. of peopleinvolved)
Page 61
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 61/69
2. a. Investment in Rs. (Note: Manpower cost invested shall also be included.)
1 Above 12 lacs
2 8.1 lacs to 12lacs
3 5.1 lacs to 8 lacs
4 3.1 lac to 5 lacs
5 Below 3 lacs
2. b. Time Frame for Design, Development and Implementation (In terms of Man Hrs / Man
days)
1 1 year and above
2 10 months to 12 months
3 8 months to 10 months
4 6 months to 8 months
5 6 months and below
2. c. No. of Persons responsible for delivering
1 more than 5
2 4
3 3
4 2
5 1
Page 62
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 62/69
2. d. Additional data or comments
3. Please mention the Benefits for the company (Give details in terms of financial gains)
3. a. Financial gains in Rs (Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.)
1 10 lacs to 20 lacs / year
2 20 lacs to 30 lacs /year
3 30 to 40 lacs /year
4 40lacs to 50 lacs / year
5 50 lacs and above / year
3. b. Additional data or comments
Any other Remarks:
Page 63
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 63/69
Detai ls of Enclosures / Support ing do cum ents / At tachm ent proofs sent :
Sr.
no.
Name of the
Document
Description of the Document No.
Recommended by (Immediate Superior of the employee or by any Executive from the Customer Department):
Immediate Superior
1. Name: Signature:
Customer Department (If Any):
2. Name: Signature:
Approved by (Divisional Head/Project Head/Plant Head /Functional Head):
Page 64
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 64/69
HOD of Nominee’s Dept:
1. Name: Signature:
HOD of Customer Dept (If Any):
2. Name: Signature:
Page 65
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 65/69
NOMINATION FORM FOR
“THE SHINING STAR TROPHY ”
(Note: Please type the descriptive part in Word Document only & then take a print of the form for filling up
the objective part and for the signatures)
Name of the Nominee: Employee no:
Grade: Department:
Function/Business: Location:
Achievement Period: Date of Application:
1. Criteria for recommendation :
1. a. Initiative
1 Responsibility given by superior in addition to defined job role.
2 Initiative taken by individual as part of small group.
3 Initiative completely taken by self
1. b. No. of Initiatives Taken & Implemented in Last 6 months
1 2 nos
2 3 nos
3 4 nos
4 5 nos
5 More than 5nos
1. c. Kindly mention each initiative in one line in the space below
Page 66
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 66/69
2. Please describe all the accomplishments made by the nominee in the space below (Givedetails for all the initiatives)
3. What have been the inputs for the implementation of the idea?(Give quantified data in terms of the investment and the no. of people involved)
3. a. Investment in Rs. (Note: Manpower cost invested shall also be included.)
1 Above 5 lacs
2 3.5 lacs to 5lacs
3 2.1 lacs to 3.5 lacs
4 1.1 lac to 2 lacs
5 Below 1 lac
3. b. No. of Persons responsible for delivering
1 more than 5
2 4
Page 67
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 67/69
3 3
4 2
5 1
3. c. Additional data or comments
4. Please mention the Benefits for the company (Give details for all the initiatives in terms of financial gains, reduction of lead time / errors / turn aroundtime etc. Quantify data to the extent possible)
4. a. Financial gains in Rs. (Note: Manpower cost saved shall also be included.)
1) Less than 2 lacs / year 2) 2 lacs to 4 lacs /year 3) 4 to 6 lacs /year 4) 6 to 8 lacs /year 5) 8 lacs and above / year
4. b. Please state any Business / Function Specific Parameter w.r.t. Enhancement in customer service due to the accomplishment.
Parameter: Reduction of waiting time, cycle time, Complaints, Defect, Turn around Time (or if anyother please specify _____________________________________)
1) Poor 2) Average3) Good
Page 68
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 68/69
4) Very Good5) Excellent
4. c. Please state any Business / Function Specific Parameter w.r.t. Process Improvement due to
the accomplishment.
Parameter: Reduction of cycle time, Errors or Turn around Time (or if any other please specify _____________________________________)
1) Poor 2) Average3) Good4) Very Good5) Excellent
4. d. Additional data or comments
Any other Remarks:
Detai ls of Enclosures / Support in g docum ents / At tachm ent proofs sent :
Page 69
7/27/2019 Benchmark Survey
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/benchmark-survey 69/69
Sr.
no.
Name of the
Document
Description of the Document No.
Recommended by (Immediate Superior of the employee or by any Executive from the Customer Department):
Immediate Superior
1. Name: Signature:
Customer Department (If Any):
2. Name: Signature:
Approved by (Divisional Head/Project Head/Plant Head /Functional Head):
HOD of Nominee’s Dept:
1 Name: Signature: