Bell Building Hazardous Material Report, June 2015

Prepared For:

Georgia State University Foundation, Inc. One Park Place South 5th Floor

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Report For:

Hazardous Building Materials

Site Investigation

Bell Building Demolition Project (101-068-15)

Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

Prepared By:

A.C.T. Services, Inc.

783 North Clayton Street

Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046

770.682.4343

www.actsvces.com

June 24, 2015

Hazardous Building Materials Report 15.11.001

I

HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT

For

GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC.

BELL BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECT (101-068-15)

25 Auburn Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Prepared for

GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC. One Park Place South 5th Floor

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Prepared by

A.C.T. SERVICES, INC. 783 North Clayton Street

Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046 770.682.4343

June 24, 2015

Prepared By: Michael J. Robarts

Signed Asbestos Inspector & Management Planner

Title June 24, 2015

Date

Hazardous Building Materials Report 15.11.001

II

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 5

2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 8

2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE.................................................................................................................................................... 8

2.2 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.3 METHODOLOGY AND RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................. 8

2.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 9

3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND PHYSICAL SETTING .............................................................. 10

3.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 10

3.2 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................................. 10

4. ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 11

4.1 DESCRIPTION OF ACBMS ....................................................................................................................................... 11

5. LEAD-BASED PAINT INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ................................................................... 16

5.1 DESCRIPTION OF LBP COMPONENTS .................................................................................................................... 16

6. HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS .......................................................................................................... 17

6.1 ASBESTOS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS ................................................................................................................. 17

6.2 LEAD HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... 18

6.3 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS & MERCURY COMPONENTS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS ..................... 19

6.4 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................... 19

6.5 VISIBLE MOLD GROWTH HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS ...................................................................................... 19

6.6 PIGEON DROPPINGS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS ............................................................................................... 20

7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 21

7.1 ACBM ABATEMENT BUDGET COST ESTIMATES FOR IDENTIFIED MATERIALS ......................................... 21

7.2 LBP ABATEMENT BUDGET COST ESTIMATES FOR IDENTIFIED MATERIALS .............................................. 22

7.3 PCB AND MERCURY DISPOSAL BUDGET COST ESTIMATES ............................................................................. 22

7.4 UST SYSTEM REMEDIATION BUDGET COST ESTIMATES ................................................................................. 22

7.5 MOLD & PIGEON DROPPING REMEDIATION BUDGET COST ESTIMATES ..................................................... 22

8. RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 23

LIST OF APPENDICES:

APPENDIX A ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIAL LOCATION DIAGRAMS

APPENDIX B SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX C ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATION DIAGRAMS AND ANALYSES REPORTS

APPENDIX D LEAD-BASED PAINT CHIP SAMPLE ANALYSES

APPENDIX E POLY-CHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ANALYSIS

APPENDIX F CONSULTANT CERTIFICATIONS

Hazardous Building Materials Report A.C.T. Services, Inc. Bell Building Demolition Project (101-068-15) Project No. 15.11.001 25 Auburn Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia June 24, 2015

1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A.C.T. Services, Inc. (ACT) has performed a limited hazardous building materials site investigation of the Bell Building (Site) located at 25 Auburn Avenue in Atlanta, Georgia. This effort was performed in accordance with the Georgia State University Foundations General Consulting Contract titled Bell Building Demolition and Surface Parking Improvements (Block Renovation) (Project Number 101-068-15), executed on January 28, 2015.

The main objective of this inspection was to confirm or rebut the presence of asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) and lead-based paints and coatings (LBP) within the subject property that may be impacted the proposed building renovation or demolition. A secondary objective was to identify other hazardous materials including, but not limited to, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing ballasts, transformers and hydraulic equipment, and mercury-containing light fixtures and thermostats. This effort was performed in full compliance with federal, state and local regulations and codes pertaining to this effort.

This investigation effort was limited to minimal destructive testing of accessible building materials and components at the time of the inspection. Secondary analyses such as point counting and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were specifically excluded in this inspection effort. No matter how thorough the inspection was performed, additional ACBMs, LBPs, PCBs and mercury-containing components not listed in this report may be present in concealed or in accessible areas of the structure.

The site investigation fieldwork was completed on Tuesday, June 9, 2015 by Michael Robarts (Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner Certification No. 14765 and Lead Inspector Certification No. 1552), John OBrien (Asbestos Inspector No. 14540), and Evelyn Smith (Asbestos Inspector Certification No. 14491). A copy of all inspector certifications has been included in the appendices.

Suspect ACBM samples collected during the inspection were submitted to Materials Analytical Services (MAS) of Suwanee, Georgia (NVLAP Lab Code 101235-0) and to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) of Smyrna, Georgia (NVLAP Lab Code 101048-1) for analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with USEPA - 600/R-93/116 Method. Suspect LBP paint chip samples were also submitted to MAS (AIHA LAP ID No. 100655) for lead analysis via Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (Flame AAS). Soil sampling for lead-contaminated soil hazards was omitted due to the absence of bare soil at the perimeter drip line of the building. One basement mastic sample was submitted to MAS for PCB analysis by EPA Method 8080A.

Based on visual observations of vent pipes and age of the building it should be presumed that an underground storage tank (UST) system may be present in the rear (south) driveway. Visual observations also confirmed the presence of potential PCB equipment (light ballasts, transformers, hydraulic equipment, etc.) and the presence of mercury-containing light fixtures and thermostats. Other potentially hazardous issues observed and investigated include the visual assessment of mold growth and the accumulation of large quantities of pigeon droppings.

All observations were performed in accordance with current general industry standards for this type of work. Additional investigations may be required to determine specific quantities of the building constituents addressed in this report.

1.1 FINDINGS

In general accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) asbestos and lead regulations, this investigation included reconnaissance of the subject property, sample collection, material analysis and review federal and state agency regulations in an effort to identify ACBMs, LBPs, PCBs and mercury-containing components that may be disturbed during the proposed building renovation or structural demolition.


2

These processes discovered regulated building components containing asbestos, lead, potential PCBs, and mercury that will require corrective action to reduce or eliminate exposure hazards during any renovation or structural demolition activity. Additional hazards observed included excessive mold growth and large accumulations of pigeon droppings.

1.1.1 Asbestos-Containing Building materials

A thorough asbestos inspection was performed in general compliance with the USEPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 61 , Subpart M and OSHA regulations defined in 29 CFR 1926.1101. This effort included minimal destructive testing and was generally limited to accessible building materials at the time of the survey; secondary analyses such as point counting and TEM were specifically excluded in this survey effort. Additional hazardous ACBMs not listed in this report could be present in other concealed or inaccessible areas of the building.

The analysis of one hundred and forty-three (143) suspect ACBM samples was performed by PLM in accordance with EPA-600/R-93/116 Method. The following building materials were found to contain regulated asbestos minerals during this process:

1. Basement Mechanical Level

a. Exterior Vapor Barrier Mastic at T Deck Entrance

2. First Floor Level

a. HVAC Duct Insulation Grey Skim Coat

b. Black Glue Dots under HVAC Duct Insulation

c. Wallboard Joint Compound

d. 9x 9 Brown Floor Tile with Black Mastic

e. 12x 12 Brown/Black Floor Tile with Black Mastic

f. Preformed Pipe Insulation (White)

g. Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-Tan/White)

h. Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown)

i. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

j. Air Handler Unit (AHU) Jacket Insulation

k. AHU Vibration Dampener/Isolator

l. Burner Gasket Rope (Suspect ACM)

m. Window Glazing and Caulk

n. Perimeter Door Caulk

3. Second Floor Level

a. Wallboard Joint Compound

b. Black Floor Tile Mastic

c. Preformed Pipe Insulation (White)

d. Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-Tan/White)

e. Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown)

f. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

g. Window Glazing and Caulk

h. Perimeter Door Caulk


3

4. Third Floor Level

a. Black Mastic at Structural Column Base

b. Preformed Pipe Insulation (White)

c. Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-Tan/White)

d. Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown)

e. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

f. Window Glazing and Caulk

g. Perimeter Door Caulk

5. Fourth Floor Level

a. Grey/Brown Glue Dots applied under Splined Ceiling Tile

b. Black Floor Tile Mastic

c. Black Mastic at Structural Column Base

d. Preformed Pipe Insulation (White)

e. Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-Tan/White)

f. Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown)

g. Black Mastic applied to Fiberglass Pipe Insulation

h. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

i. AHU Vibration Dampener/Isolator

j. Window Glazing and Caulk

k. Perimeter Door Caulk

6. Attic Level

a. Preformed Pipe Insulation (White)

b. Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-Tan/White)

c. Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown)

d. Vessel Plaster Insulation (Grey)

e. TSI Contaminated Attic Insulation

f. Brown Cork Pipe Insulation

g. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

h. Thermal System Insulation Impacted Attic fiberglass Insulation

7. Third Floor Core Area Roof

a. Silver Wrap over Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

b. Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

c. Exterior Window Glazing and Caulk

d. Roof Flashing

e. Black Roof Patch Mastic

8. Main Roof Area

a. Roof Parapet and Curb Flashing

b. Black Mastic applied to Stone/Terracotta Coping

c. Black Roof Patch Mastic


4

d. Tooling Tower Corrugated Cement Panels

e. Exterior Window Glazing and Caulk

f. Exterior Door Caulks

1.1.2 Lead Based paint Components

A limited collection of deteriorated non-intact paint chip samples was performed to determine lead concentrations via Flame AAS. The main objective of the suspect LBP sample collection was to identify potential lead hazards associated with the deteriorated lead-containing paints and coatings applied to typical building surfaces as defined by OSHA lead standards. This limited LBP survey was performed as a preliminary determination and was not intended to comply with any federal or state regulation pertaining to target housing or child occupied facilities.

A total of nine (9) non-intact paint chips samples were collected and analyzed via Flame AAS for the determination of lead concentrations. Soil sampling for lead-contaminated soil hazards was omitted due to the absence of bare soil at the perimeter drip line of the building.

All nine (9) paint chip samples were found to contain the following lead percent by weight (% wt.).

1. Interior Plaster Walls .................................................................................................................... 0.31% to 4.5%

2. Exterior Metal Doors ..................................................................................................................... 7.8%

3. Metal Window Components ..................................................................................................... 1.8%

4. Metal Building Components ..................................................................................................... 1.5%

5. Floor Paint Chip Debris ................................................................................................................ 1.0%

6. Exterior Plaster Walls .................................................................................................................... 0.019%

1.1.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls & Mercury-Containing Components.

Fluorescent light fixtures and bulbs were observed throughout the building. Suspect stored PCB-containing light ballasts were observed in various locations of the building including, but not limited to, custodian closets, bathrooms and storage areas.

1. PCB Ballasts (Estimated) .............................................................................................. 400 Each

2. Mercury-containing Lamps (Estimated) .............................................................. 1,800 Each

In addition, five (5) unlabeled 55-gallon steel drums apparently containing waste oil were observed on the first floor adjacent to the elevator area. Due to limited labeling, the drums may contain hydraulic fluid with the potential to contain PCBs. No PCBs were detected in the basement mastic sample submitted for analysis.

1.1.4 Underground Storage Tank (UST) System.

Visual observations of the rear driveway area noted several unidentifiable vent pipes extending upward from the ground that would suggest the installation of a UST system for fuel oil used to power the original boiler system. USTs of this anticipated age have been documented to leak and cause considerable contamination to the surrounding soil and groundwater. Regulations require that leaking USTs be cleaned up to restore and protect groundwater sources. A site characterization and additional testing maybe warranted to determine the presence of a UST system and/or contaminated soils or groundwater.

1. Fuel Oil UST (Estimated) ............................................................................................... 8,000 Gallons


5

1.1.5 Visible Mold Growth.

Currently, the Bell Building is abandoned and visual observations indicate that the buildings interior spaces have been unconditioned for a number of years. Numerous areas of moisture intrusion related to roof leaks and exterior envelope breaches were observed throughout the building. The moisture intrusion and unconditioned interior spaces has resulted in numerous large areas of mold growth observed on interior wall, floor and ceiling surfaces.

1. Mold-Contaminated Surfaces ...................................................................................... 10,000 Square Feet

1.1.6 Pigeon Droppings.

Large areas of accumulated pigeon dropping contamination were noted in various interior areas of the breached building envelope. Histoplasmosis and Cryptococcus disease fungus spores are emitted from nutrient-rich accumulations of pigeon droppings. Pigeon dropping contamination can cause serious health risks that arise from exposure to these airborne disease organisms. Prior to any building material disturbances it is recommended that all pigeon dropping contamination issues be addressed.

1. Accumulated Pigeon Droppings ................................................................................. 12,000 cubic feet

1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

Within the limits of this effort, ACT has identified hazardous building materials and other constituents that may require corrective activities prior to building renovation or demolition.

1.2.1 Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

Building materials containing greater than one percent (>1%) regulated asbestiform minerals are considered asbestos-containing materials as defined by USEPA in 40 CFR Chapter 61, Subpart M and OSHA Standard 1926.1101. Moreover, OSHA also regulates worker protection standards for those building materials containing equal to or less than one percent (


6

presumed to contain lead. The delaminated non-intact paint coatings are dispersed throughout the floor surfaces within the structure and present a lead hazard under OSHA standards for lead 29 CFR 1910 and 1926. OSHA does not recognize a lower threshold for lead concentrations and requires all employers to communicate the potential lead health hazards to their employees as part of a Hazard Communication Program 29 CFR 1919.1200.

Lead-based paint in poor condition and deteriorated paint should be properly remediated prior to a proposed renovation or demolition activity. Abatement of lead-based paint can be performed using various methods including, but not limited to, component removal, paint stabilization, encapsulation and enclosure. Peeling and flaking paint chips and paint debris observed in various locations throughout the facility should be stabilized immediately to eliminate the potential of creating further lead-hazards to persons entering the building.

Recommended options for the abatement and disposal of lead-based paints that exceed the US EPA hazardous waste standard are available. These include non-methylene chloride paint strippers such as LEAD-OUT Paint Stripper products which are designed to react at the molecular level with lead and other heavy metals to render them non-hazardous allowing for inexpensive disposal. Waste profile sampling is still required prior to disposal as non-hazardous waste. This technology would be considered an engineering control to assist in the reduction of worker lead exposure.

OSHA has regulations governing construction worker exposure to lead. Employers of construction workers engaged in the repair, renovation, removal, demolition, and salvage of structures and materials (building components) are responsible for the development and implementation of a worker protection program in accordance with 29 CFR Part 1926.62. This lead hazard program is essential to minimize worker risk of lead exposure. Employers must be in compliance with OSHAs lead standard at all times.

The USEPAs National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) [73 FR 66964, Nov 12, 2008] for ambient lead concentrations is 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter of air (g/m3). This standard air concentration would be a concern during any renovation or demolition event due to the poor condition of identified lead coatings. Disposal of lead-containing waste must be performed in accordance with Georgia EPD Solid Waste Management regulations.

Georgia EPD regulates all lead-based paint abatement activities associated with target housing and/or child occupied facilities; only Georgia EPD certified lead abatement contractors should perform abatement activities associated with target housing or child occupied facilities under properly controlled conditions.

1.2.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls & Mercury-containing Components

ACT investigated the building for the presence of PCB containing equipment (light ballasts, transformers, hydraulic equipment, etc.) and the presence of mercury-containing light fixtures and thermostats. PCB waste is defined in 40 CFR, Part 761. Mercury-containing waste is defined in 40 CFR, Part 273.

Both the OSHA and Georgia EPD regulate proper handling and disposal of PCB and mercury-containing materials. It is recommended that obsolete PCB and mercury-containing equipment should be carefully removed by qualified personnel and packaged for recycling in accordance the Universal Waste Management regulations. PCB and mercury-containing equipment not listed in this report may be present in concealed or in accessible areas of the building.


7

1.2.3 Underground Storage Tank Systems

ACT investigated the building for evidence of UST systems and found several unidentifiable vent pipes extending from the ground level to the roof. These vent pipes can be observed in the rear (south) driveway area. Photographs have also been included in the appendices.

Due to the age of the building and evidence of vent pipes, we recommend performing a site characterization (also referred to as site assessment) to determine if a UST is or was present and if the UST site has experienced a release of hazardous and petroleum substance that trigger regulatory action. The site assessment should include a detailed subsurface investigation by excavation, direct push techniques or other acceptable means necessary to obtain chemical analysis of soil and groundwater.

1.2.4 Visible Mold Growth.

Visible mold growth was observed on interior wall, floor and ceiling surfaces during ACTs site reconnaissance. Although no sample collection or analysis was performed, disturbance of mold contaminated building materials without taking appropriate precautions could result in elevated airborne mold levels.

Elevated concentrations of target mold species, such as Chaetomium, Fusarium, Memnoniella, Stachybotrys, and Trichoderma should not be found indoors. These species can influence allergic hypersensitivity responses and symptoms of asthma in certain individuals. Prior to any building material disturbances it is recommended that all moisture and mold issues be addressed.

1.2.5 Pigeon Droppings.

Large populations of roosting pigeons have breached the buildings envelope and now present the risk of disease to building workers or people nearby. The most serious health risks arise from disease organisms that can grow in the nutrient-rich accumulations of bird droppings, feathers and debris under a roost, particularly if roosts have been active for years. Pigeon dropping contamination can cause serious health risks that arise from exposure to these airborne disease organisms.

Histoplasmosis and Cryptococcus disease fungus spores are emitted from the nutrient-rich accumulations of pigeon droppings. Therefore, it is recommended that prior to any building material disturbances all pigeon dropping contamination issues be addressed.


8

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This hazardous building materials site investigation included reconnaissance of the subject property, sample collection, material analysis and review of regulatory guidelines in an effort to identify hazardous building materials with the potential to impact the proposed renovation or demolition of the subject building. In particular, the building was investigated for evidence of hazardous conditions associated with ACBMs, LBPs, PCBs, and mercury-containing building components. The protocol utilized for this investigation was in general accordance with the requirements of the USEPAs 40 CFR 763 Subpart E and 40 CFR Chapter 61, Subpart M. This report includes documentation to support the analysis, opinions and conclusions as presented.

2.2 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

USE BY THIRD PARTIES

This report was prepared pursuant to the contract between ACT and the Georgia State University Foundation, Inc. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the property that was unique between ACT and its client and serves as the basis for this report. Because of the importance of the communication between ACT and its client, reliance or any use of this report by any person or entity other than the Georgia State University Foundation, Inc. and its assignees, agents or client, is prohibited without explicit written authorization from ACT. Reliance on or use by any such third party, either with or without written authorization of ACT, does not create a third party beneficiary relationship, either expressed or implied, between ACT and said party or the Georgia State University Foundation, Inc. ACT makes no warranties or guarantees, either expressed or implied, concerning the fitness, suitability or completeness of this report, either in whole or part, for any particular use or purpose by any third party whatsoever.

2.3 METHODOLOGY AND RESOURCES

RECONNAISSANCE

Site reconnaissance was completed on Tuesday, June 9, 2015 by Michael Robarts (Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner Certification No. 14765 and Lead Inspector Certification No. 1552), John OBrien (Asbestos Inspector No. 14540), and Evelyn Smith (Asbestos Inspector Certification No. 14491). Inspector certifications have been included in the appendices.

Suspect ACBM samples collected during the inspection were submitted to MAS of Suwanee, Georgia (NVLAP Lab Code 101235-0) and to EMSL of Smyrna, Georgia (NVLAP Lab Code 101048-1) for analysis by PLM in accordance with USEPA - 600/R-93/116 Method. Suspect LBP paint chip samples were also submitted to MAS (AIHA LAP ID No. 100655) for lead analysis via Flame AAS. Soil sampling for lead-contaminated soil hazards was omitted due to the absence of bare soil at the perimeter drip line of the building. One basement mastic sample was submitted to MAS for PCB analysis by EPA Method 8080A.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY INFORMATION

Information regarding Federal and State environmental, safety and health compliance regulations was obtained and reviewed from USEPA, OSHA and Georgia Department of Natural Recourses as follows:

OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction Industry)

OSHA 29 CFR Part 1010.1001 Asbestos (General Industry)

OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926.62 Lead (Construction Industry)


9

OSHA 29 CFR Part 1910.1025 Lead (General Industry)

OSHA 29 CFR Part 1910 Subpart Z Toxic and Hazardous Substance

EPA 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E - Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools

EPA 40 CFR Part 761.62 Disposal of PCB Bulk Product Waste

EPA 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management (Mercury)

EPA 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M - National Emission Standards for Asbestos

Georgia Department of Natural Recourses Rules of Asbestos Removal and Encapsulation Chapter 391-3-14

Georgia Department of Natural Recourses Rules of Lead Based Paint Abatement, Certification and Accreditation Chapter 391-3-24

Georgia Department of Natural Recourses Rules for Solid Waste Management Chapter 391-3-4

Georgia Department of Natural Recourses Rules for Hazardous Waste Management Chapter 391-3-11

HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION

Historical building use documentation was not provided for the building. However, site information indicates that the original site building was built in the early 1920s as an office/switchboard building for the Bell Telephone Company. Apparent building additions were added to the east and south side of the original building circa 1930s. Records indicate that the building was operated by Bell Telephone until the 1970s when Bell Telephone moved their operations to another location. It appears as though the building has been vacant or used for storage since the 1970s.

INFORMATION REPORTED BY USER

No previous environmental reports pertaining to possible presence of hazardous building materials were identified by the client for review during ACTs site inspection.

OTHER RESOURCES

Other resources and information accessed for this site assessment are discussed in appropriate sections of this report.

2.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF ASSESSMENT

Besides the limitations set forth in various sections of this report, the accuracy and completeness of this report may be limited by the following:

Access Limitations Limited destructive testing.

Physical Obstructions to Observations Access to some roof and attic areas prohibited due to deteriorated building conditions.

Outstanding Information Requests None

Regulatory Compliance LBP sampling was not intended to meet regulatory compliance.

Other Definitive asbestos sample analysis by TEM and/or PLM-Point Counting and soil-lead sampling was excluded.


10

3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND PHYSICAL SETTING

3.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The Bell Building is located at 25 Auburn Avenue in Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia.

The four-story white concrete, terracotta block and steel structured building constructed over a concrete foundation with basement. The current building consists of the original building structure constructed in the early 1920s with building additions added to the east and south sides of the original building. A two-story open core section in the center of the building footprint was created by these additions.

3.2 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS

The buildings roof systems were built-up roof materials with parapet walls. The building ceiling decks were terracotta blocks covered by plaster. Remnants of suspended and splined acoustical ceiling tiles were observed in some of the building spaces. The original perimeter walls were terracotta block or brick covered by plaster.

Remnants of wallboard, wood panel, concrete block, plaster and lathe and acoustical splined tile wall systems were observed in some of the building spaces. Windows were combination of metal and wood framed glass. The floors were concrete with some covered by remnants of various types of deteriorated floor covering materials. Insulated steam pipes were identified in perimeter column pipe chases. All organic building materials were observed to be contaminated with visible mold growth. Large areas of accumulated pigeon droppings were also observed.

Two mechanical room areas were observed on the first and fourth floor levels. The first floor area included a former boiler room and air handler room with a variety of insulated steam and chilled water lines. The air handler unit was insulated and no boiler was present. The fourth floor air handler was not insulated however; all servicing lines were insulated with a variety of insulating materials.

An attic area was located between the fourth floor level and roof which contained a variety of pipe insulations, fiberglass attic insulations and a large area of accumulated pigeon droppings. All insulating materials were observed to be in poor condition.

The basement mechanical equipment was decommissioned prior to this effort. Three newer installed boilers and two condensate tanks were observed in the mechanical area with a variety of electrical switch gear and breaker boxes. A water collection sump system was also shutdown. The boiler flew had been modified for the newer style boiler systems. Non-asbestos resinous black vapor barrier mastic was observed throughout the basement area. This material was also sampled for PCBs with a negative result.

Drawings identifying each floor level and general sample locations are included in the Appendix.


11

4. ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

4.1 DESCRIPTION OF ACBMS

Based on the results of the building material sample analysis, ACT has developed the following table summarizing the materials determined to contain asbestos. This table contains only those materials sampled during ACTs site reconnaissance.

TABLE 1

GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY BELL BUILDING

BUILDING AREA

SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER

BUILDING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MATERIAL ASSESSMENT

ASBESTOS DETECTED (%)

Basement B-1 B-01 White Mastic over Orange Fiberglass Pipe Insulation Boiler 1

Non-Friable Non-Detect

Basement B-1 B-02 White Mastic over Orange Fiberglass Pipe Insulation Boiler 2


Basement B-1 B-03 Boiler Gasket Woven Rope Friable Non-Detect Basement B-1 B-04 White Ceiling Paint Coating Friable Non-Detect Basement B-2 B-05 Black Vapor Barrier Mastic Utility Tunnel Non-Friable Non-Detect Basement B-2 B-06 Black Vapor Barrier Felt Utility Tunnel Non-Friable Non-Detect Basement B-2 B-07 Cementitious Wire Conduit Utility Tunnel Non-Friable Non-Detect Exterior East B-08 Vapor Barrier Mastic at T Deck Courtyard North Non-Friable Non-Detect Exterior East B-09 Vapor Barrier Mastic at T Deck Courtyard South Non-Friable Non-Detect Exterior South B-10 Vapor Barrier Mastic at T Deck Entrance Non-Friable 15 Basement B-1 B-11 Black Vapor Barrier Mastic Perimeter Wall Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 1-1 1-01 Brown 9x9 Floor Tile Friable 20 Room 1-1 1-01 Floor Tile Black Mastic Friable 3 Room 1-1 1-02 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 1-1 1-03 Brown Ceiling Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 1-1 1-04 Vinyl Duct Cover with Black Mastic Friable Non-Detect

Room 1-1 1-05 Black/Brown12x12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic

Friable 10

Room 1-1 1-06 Wallboard Joint Compound - 1st Layer Friable 2 Room 1-1 1-07 Wallboard Joint Compound - 2nd Layer Friable 5 Room 1-1 1-08 Cove Base Mastic on Wallboard Non-Friable Non-Detect

Room 1-1 1-09 Pipe Insulation Air-Cell (Grey-Brown) with White Wrap

Friable 5

Room 1-1 1-10 Brown 9x9 Floor Tile with Black Mastic Friable 10 Room 1-1a 1-11 Wallboard Joint Compound Friable 3 Room 1-23 1-12 White Window Glaze Friable Non-Detect Room 1-23 1-13 White Window Caulk Friable Non-Detect Room 1-24 1-14 Vibration Dampener/Isolator Friable 40 Room 1-24 1-15 AHU Fan Housing Jacket Friable 20 Room 1-24 1-16 AHU North End Jacket Friable 20 Room 1-24 1-17 AHU Supply Duct Jacket Friable 25 Room 1-1 1-18 HVAC Duct Insulation Grey Skim Coat Friable 6


12

TABLE 1


BUILDING AREA




Room 1-1 1-19 HVAC Duct Insulation Grey Skim Coat Friable 6 Room 1-1 1-20 Black Glue Dots under HVAC Duct Insulation Non-Friable 18 Room E-1 1-21 Front Entrance Ceiling Texture Friable Non-Detect Room E-1 1-22 Front Entrance Ceiling Texture Friable Non-Detect Room E-1 1-23 Electrical Wire Cloth Insulation Friable Non-Detect Room E-1 1-24 Electrical Wire Cloth Insulation Friable Non-Detect Room E-1 1-25 Electrical Wire Cloth Insulation Friable Non-Detect Room 2-1 2-01 White Suspended Ceiling Tile with Ridges Friable Non-Detect Room 2-11 2-02 White Window Glaze Friable Non-Detect Room 2-11 2-03 White Window Caulk Friable 20 Room 2-1 2-04 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 2-2 2-05 Brown Ceiling Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-2 2-06 White Suspended Ceiling Tile with Random Fissures & Pinholes

Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-2 2-07 Wallboard Joint Compound Friable Non-Detect


Friable 55

Room 2-3 2-09 Wallboard & White Texture Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 2-3 2-10 Wallboard Joint Compound Friable 3 Room 2-3 2-11 Ceiling Texture with Black Mastic Friable Non-Detect Room 2-3 2-12 Wallboard Texture with Pink Paint Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-4 2-13 Ceiling Plaster (White Skim, White Scratch, & Brown Base Coats)

Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-4 2-14 White Suspended Ceiling Tile with Random Fissures & Pinholes

Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-4 2-15 White/Black Pipe Wrap Over Fiberglass Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 2-4 2-16 White Suspended Ceiling Tile (Smooth) Friable Non-Detect Room 2-4a 2-17 Restroom Wallboard Joint Compound Friable Non-Detect Room 2-9 2-18 12x12 Waffle Pattern Splined Wall Tile Friable Non-Detect Room 2-9 2-19 Wall Tile Brown Glue Dots Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 2-4 2-20 White Suspended Ceiling Tile with Ridges Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-8 2-21 Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

Non-Friable 7

Room 2-8 2-22 White Plaster Pipe Fitting Insulation & White Wrap

Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-8 2-23 White Cloth Wrap Over Fiberglass Pipe Insulation

Friable Non-Detect


Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-8 2-25 White Cloth Wrap Over Fiberglass Pipe Insulation

Friable Non-Detect


13

TABLE 1


BUILDING AREA




Rear Stairwell 2-26 Perimeter Door Caulk Friable 15 Rear Stairwell 2-27 Black Coating on Brick Under Wall Plaster Non-Friable Non-Detect


Friable Non-Detect

Room 2-8 2-29 AHU Duct Canvas Wrap Friable Non-Detect Room 2-8 2-30 AHU Duct Canvas Wrap Friable Non-Detect Rear Stairwell 2-31 Fire Hose Non-Friable Non-Detect 2-11 2-32 White Plaster at Wall Chase Behind Stairwell Friable Non-Detect Rear Stairwell 3-01 Black Coating on Brick Under Wall Plaster Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-02 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect 3-03 VOID SAMPLE BY INSPECTOR N/A --- Room 3-2 3-04 Black Sheet Flooring Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-05 Black Sheet Flooring with Green Backing Friable Non-Detect Room 3-1 3-06 Black Coating on Brick Under Wall Plaster Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 3-1 3-07 White Window Glaze Friable Non-Detect Room 3-1 3-08 White Window Caulk Friable Non-Detect Room 3-1 3-09 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-10 Radiator Green Heat Shield with Black Mastic Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-11 Black Mastic on Support Column Non-Friable 18 Room 3-2 3-12 Residual Black Floor Mastic Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-22 Beige Window Caulk West Friable 12 Room 3-2 3-23 Beige Window Caulk East Friable 15 Room 3-2 3-26 White Paint Coat over Plaster Ceiling Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-27 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Elevator Lobby 3-28 White Paint Coat over Plaster Ceiling Friable Non-Detect Room 3-2 3-29 Electrical Closet Cloth Electrical Wire Insulation Friable Non-Detect Rear Stairwell 3-30 Building Exterior Tan Textured Paint Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-01 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-02 Light Grey-Brown Wall Plaster Over Lathe/Brick Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-03 Light Brown Window Glaze Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-04 Brown Window Caulk Friable 10 Room 4-4 4-05 White Window Caulk Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-06 Terracotta Wall Tiles Beneath Plaster Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-07 White Wall Plaster Patch Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-08 Preformed Pipe Insulation (White-Tan) Friable 45 Room 4-4 4-09 Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-White) Friable 65 Room 4-4 4-10 Grey-Brown Perimeter Door Caulk Friable 5 Room 4-4 4-11 White Interior Door Caulk Friable Non-Detect South Stairwell 4-12 Floor Covering with Black Mastic Friable Non-Detect

Room 4-5 4-13 Pipe Fitting Insulation (Grey-White) Friable 30 Chrysotile

2 Amosite


14

TABLE 1


BUILDING AREA





Friable 20

Room 4-5 4-15 Plaster on Bathroom Stall Support Frame Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-16 Electrical Closet Cloth Electrical Wire Insulation Friable Non-Detect North Stairwell 4-17 Residual Black Floor Mastic Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 4-3 4-18 Vibration Dampener/Isolator Friable 45 Room 4-3 4-19 Brown Pipe Wrap Non-Friable Non-Detect

Room 4-3 4-19A Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

Non-Friable 5

Room 4-3 4-20 TSI White Wrap with Black Mastic Pipe Elbow Over Fiberglass

Friable 30 Chrysotile

2 Amosite Attic West 4-21 Black Wrap over Fiberglass Pipe Insulation Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 4-2 4-22 Brown Wall Plaster with White Skim Coat Friable Non-Detect Room 4-2 4-23 Tan Window Glaze Friable 2 Room 4-2 4-24 Tan Window Caulk Friable Non-Detect Room 4-3 4-25 Black Pipe Lag Cloth Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-26 Black Residual 9-Inch Floor Tile Mastic Friable 2 Room 4-4 4-27 Grey Residual Floor Leveling Compound Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-28 White/Brown Window Glazing Friable Non-Detect Room 4-4 4-29 Tan Window Caulk Friable 2 South Stairwell 4-30 Black/Grey Floor Covering Non-Friable Non-Detect Room 4-1 4-31 Grey Window Putty Friable Non-Detect Room 4-2 4-32 Grey/Brown Glue Dots under Spline Ceiling Non-Friable 5

ATTIC CRAWLSPACE LEVEL West Side 5-01 Fiberglass Attic Insulation Friable Non-Detect East Side 5-02 Fiberglass Attic Insulation Friable Non-Detect East Side 5-03 Preformed Pipe Insulation (White) Friable 10 East Side 5-04 Vessel Plaster Insulation (Grey) Friable 15

East Side 5-05 Black Mastic on 12 Header Pipe Foam Glass Insulation

Friable 5

East Side 5-06 Pipe Fitting Insulation (Gray) Friable 15 East Side 5-07 Brown Cork Pipe Insulation Non-Friable 12 East Side 5-08 Brown Cork Pipe Fitting Insulation Non-Friable Non-Detect East Side 5-09 Black Pipe Wrap of Fiberglass Non-Friable Non-Detect

THIRD FLOOR CORE AREA ROOF LEVEL NW Corner 3-13 Silver Wrap on Foam Glass Pipe Insulation Non-Friable Non-Detect NW Corner 3-13 Silver Wrap on Foam Glass Pipe Insulation Non-Friable 12 NW Corner 3-14 Black Mastic on Foam Glass Pipe Insulation Non-Friable 18 NW Corner 3-15 Black Mastic Under Silver Pipe Wrap Non-Friable 18

NW Corner 3-16 Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation 1st Layer

Non-Friable 10


15

TABLE 1


BUILDING AREA




NW Corner 3-16 Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation 2nd Layer


NW Corner 3-16 Black Mastic applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation 3rd Layer

Non-Friable 18

East Side 3-17 Rolled Roofing 1st Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect East Side 3-18 Built-Up Roof System 2nd Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect East Side 3-19 Roof Deck Mastic 3rd Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect East Side 3-20 Roof Light Weight Concrete Deck 4th Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect East Side 3-21 Roof Perimeter Flashing Non-Friable 10

ORIGINAL BUILDING DILAPIDATED ROOF Southeast Corner

R05 Black Roof Felt Non-Friable Non-Detect

Southeast Corner

R06 Black Roof Felts Top Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect

Southeast Corner

R07 Black Roof Felts 2nd Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect

Southwest Corner

R08 Black Roof Felts 3rd Layer Non-Friable Non-Detect

Southwest Corner

R09 Tan-Grey Concrete Non-Friable Non-Detect

Southwest Corner

R10 Tan-Grey Concrete Non-Friable Non-Detect

South Parapet R13 Roof Flashing Felts Non-Friable 12 South Parapet R14 Roof Flashing Mastics Non-Friable 17

BUILDING ADDITION MAIN ROOF LEVEL Northwest Corner

R01 Built-Up Roof Non-Friable Non-Detect

East Parapet R02 Roof Flashing Non-Friable 8 South Center

R03 Built-Up Roof Non-Friable Non-Detect

Northwest Parapet

R04 Roof Flashing Non-Friable 5

Cooling Tower R11 Corrugated Cement Board Wall Panels Non-Friable 20 Northwest Corner

R12 Black Mastic applied to Stone Coping Non-Friable 17

Additional analysis by TEM or PLM point counting are some available options to determine quantified levels of asbestos in difficult samples such as drywall joint compound, roofing and floor tile materials.


16

5. LEAD-BASED PAINT INVESTIGATION SUMMARY

5.1 DESCRIPTION OF LBP COMPONENTS

Lead-containing building components affected by a demolition must be handled appropriately to assure that no employee is exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit. Disposal of lead-containing waste must be performed in accordance with Georgia EPD Solid Waste Management

regulations. Laboratory results for the paint chip samples analyzed were found to contain the following percent by weight (% wt.) lead content.

1. Stairwell Interior Plaster Walls (0.31% to 4.5%)

2. Painted Exterior Metal Doors (7.8%)

3. Painted Metal Window Components (1.8%)

4. Painted Metal Building Components (1.5%)

5. Stairwell Floor Debris Including Paint Chips (1.0%)

6. Exterior Wall Paint (0.019%)


17

6. HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

6.1 ASBESTOS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

The NESHAP regulations (40 CFR 61 (M)) require that regulated asbestos-containing materials (RACM) be properly abated prior to any demolition or renovation activity, which may disturb them. The EPA NESHAP regulations define RACM as:

(a) Friable ACM (ACM that can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure);

(b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable;

(c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subject to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or;

(d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming, or has become, crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.

An assessment of potential exposure to harmful asbestos fibers from ACBMs should evaluate the material's potential to release fibers into the air. Fiber release may occur spontaneously due to the normal aging and subsequent deterioration of the materials. Fiber release may also occur suddenly due to disturbance of the materials by maintenance, renovations, demolition, accidents, excessive vibrations, or water damage. As a part of the survey, a visual assessment was performed in order to ascertain the potential for asbestos fiber release from suspected materials.

The assessment focused upon specific criteria which include asbestos content (percentage and type); friability; evidence of deterioration, physical damage or water damage; proximity to an air stream; and accessibility. The effects of potential renovation activities were considered separately for each affected material found to contain asbestos. The surveyor based upon facility characteristics, prior experience, an understanding of abatement alternatives, and proposed demolition plans evaluates these criteria qualitatively. This method of evaluation is outlined in the EPA's "Guidance for Controlling Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings" (EPA 560/5-85-024).

The results of the evaluations are reported in relative terms describing the potential for asbestos fiber release. Materials that are in good physical condition and exhibit little chance for disturbance are considered to have a "low" potential for fiber release. Materials that are in poor condition with some deterioration or damage, or exhibit some risk for disturbance present a "medium" potential for fiber emission. Materials that are in generally poor condition and exhibit the chance for further deterioration, damage, or disturbance are considered to present a "high" potential to generate airborne fibers. A material assessed as an "imminent hazard" is typically damaged, openly exposed, likely to be disturbed and displays a very high possibility of releasing fibers into the air. The following assessments have been determined based on the understanding that the subject building is proposed for demolition with the complete removal of all asbestos-containing materials by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor under properly controlled conditions.

ACBM FIBER RELEASE POTENTIAL

Low Medium High Imminent Hazard

Exterior Vapor Barrier Mastic

HVAC Insulation Jackets (Ducts, Air Handlers, & Vessels)

Glue Dots (HVAC Duct Insulation & Splined Ceiling)

Wallboard Joint Compound


18

Low Medium High Imminent Hazard

Window Glazing/Caulk Material

Perimeter Door Caulking Material

Floor Tile and Mastic

Floor Tile Mastic (Floors & Structural Columns)

Asbestos Contaminated Floor Debris

Burner Gasket Rope (Suspect ACM)

Vibration Dampener/Isolator

TSI Pipe Insulation (6-inch Pipe Diameter)

TSI Contaminated Attic Insulation

Black Mastic Applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

Silver Wrap/Mastic over Foam Glass Pipe Insulation

Black Roof Patch Mastic

Roof Parapet and Curb Flashing

Black Mastic Applied to Stone/Terracota Coping

Cooling Tower Corrugated Cement Board Panels

6.2 LEAD HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

The EPA standards (40 CFR Part 745) provide assessment methodology for the determination of a lead-hazard screen. This method requires an inspector to evaluate paint conditions for deterioration, accumulation of visible suspect debris, and painted surfaces that are impact points and/or subject to friction. The conditions noted by ACTs inspector can be compared to the following table and applied to the appropriate categories.

LEAD-BASED PAINT CONDITION GUIDENCE

BUILDING COMPONENT

DESCRIPTION INTACT FAIR POOR

Exterior large surface components Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 10 square feet

More than 10 square feet

Interior large surface components Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 2 square feet

More than 2 square feet

Small surface area components Entire surface is intact

Less than or equal to 10% total

More than 10% of total surface area

Based on the aforementioned table, ACTs lead inspector assessed the physical condition for each of the lead-based paint building components as follows:


19

LEAD-BASED PAINT CONDITION

Intact Fair Poor

Interior Plaster Walls & Ceilings

Painted Exterior Metal Doors

Painted Metal Window Components

Brown Painted Metal Components (hand rails, Spindles, etc.)

Exterior Building Paint

Interior Paint Debris Building Stairwells & Floors

Peeling and flaking paint chips and paint debris observed throughout the building should be remediated using appropriate methods immediately to eliminate the lead-hazard.

6.3 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS & MERCURY COMPONENTS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

ACT investigated the building for the presence of PCB containing equipment (light ballasts, transformers, hydraulic equipment, etc.) and the presence of mercury-containing light fixtures and thermostats. PCBs are a known carcinogenic that can also cause chloracne, liver damage, nausea, dizziness, eye irritation, and bronchitis. Mercury can affect the body if it is inhaled or if it comes in contact with the eyes or skin or if it is introduced into the digestive system the ingestion.

Both the OSHA and Georgia EPD regulate proper handling and disposal of PCB and mercury-containing materials. It is recommended that obsolete PCB and mercury-containing equipment should be carefully removed by qualified personnel and packaged for recycling in accordance the Universal Waste Management regulations. PCB and mercury-containing equipment not listed in this report may be present in concealed or in accessible areas of the building.

6.4 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS

ACT investigated the building for evidence of UST systems and found several unidentifiable vent pipes extending from the ground level to the roof. These vent pipes can be observed in the rear (south) driveway area. Photographs have also been included in the appendices.


6.5 VISIBLE MOLD GROWTH HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

Visible mold growth was observed on interior wall, floor and ceiling surfaces during ACTs site reconnaissance. Elevated concentrations of target mold species, such as Chaetomium, Fusarium, Memnoniella, Stachybotrys, and Trichoderma should not be found indoors. These species can influence allergic hypersensitivity responses and symptoms of asthma in certain individuals.

Although no sample collection or analysis was performed, disturbance of mold contaminated building materials without taking appropriate precautions could result in elevated airborne mold levels. Prior to any building material disturbances it is recommended that all moisture and mold issues be addressed.


20

6.6 PIGEON DROPPINGS HAZARD SCREEN FINDINGS

Large populations of roosting pigeons have breached the buildings envelope and now present the risk of disease to building workers or people nearby. The most serious health risks arise from Histoplasmosis and Cryptococcus disease organisms that can grow in the nutrient-rich accumulations of bird droppings, feathers and debris under a roost, particularly if roosts have been active for years.

External parasites also may become a problem when infested birds or bats leave roosts or nests. The parasites then can invade buildings and bite people including mosquitos who are associated with transmitting the West Nile encephalitis virus to humans from birds including Pigeons. Prior to any building material disturbances it is recommended that all pigeon dropping contamination issues be addressed.


21

7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

A.C.T. Services has performed a hazardous building materials site investigation including the evaluation of ACBMs, LBP, PCBs, and mercury-containing components in general conformance with the scope and limitations discussed in this report on the Bell Building located at 25 Auburn Avenue in Fulton County, Georgia.

Exceptions to or deletions from the EPA standard were discussed earlier in this report. This investigation has identified several types of deteriorated ACBMs, building components with LBP, and suspect PCB and mercury-containing light fixtures and electrical equipment that may require additional action to reduce or eliminate potential hazards associated with the demolition of the building.

7.1 ACBM ABATEMENT BUDGET COST ESTIMATES FOR IDENTIFIED MATERIALS

ACBM ESTIMATED ABATEMENT EXPENSE

BUILDING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST

Exterior Vapor Barrier 45 SF 85.00 $ 3,825

HVAC Insulation Jackets (Ducts, Air Handler, & Vessels) 2,100 sf 8.00 $ 16,800

Glue Dots (HVAC Duct Insulation & Splined Ceiling) 1,200 sf 0.75 $ 900

Wallboard Joint Compound 8,100 sf 1.85 $ 14,985

Window Glazing/Caulk Material 218 Windows 85.00 $ 18,530

Perimeter Door Caulking Material 16 Doors 85.00 $ 1,360

Floor Tile and Mastic 14,650 sf 1.75 $ 25,638

Floor Tile Mastic (Floors & Structural Columns) 7,200 sf 0.80 $ 5,760

Asbestos Contaminated Debris 5,000 sf 0.65 $ 3,250

Fiberglass Pipe Insulation with Black Mastic 350 sf 7.00 $ 2,450

Burner Unit Gasket Rope 1 lf 350 $ 350

Vibration Dampener/Isolator 95 sf 9.00 $855

TSI Pipe Insulation (6-Inch Pipe Diameter) 390 lf 15.00 $ 5,850

Black Mastic Applied to Foam Glass Pipe Insulation 1,135 lf 7.00 $ 7,945

Black Mastic Applied to Column Bases 65 sf 15 $ 975

Black Roof Patch Mastic 1,500 sf 1.75 $ 2,625

Roof Parapet and Curb Flashing 4,200 sf 3.25 $ 13,650

Black Mastic Applied to Stone/Terracotta Coping 1,060 lf 4.25 $ 4,505

Cooling Tower Corrugated Cement Board Panels 750 sf 4.50 $ 3,377

Project Monitor Expense 45 shifts 650 $ 29,250

Total ACBM Cost Estimate $ 211,118


22

7.2 LBP ABATEMENT BUDGET COST ESTIMATES FOR IDENTIFIED MATERIALS

LBP ESTIMATED ABATEMENT EXPENSE



Stabilize Paint on Walls & Ceilings 39,360 sf 1.30 $ 51,168

Remove Paint Debris on Floors 61,280 sf 0.45 $ 27,578

Consulting and Clearance Testing 20 shifts 650 $ 13,000

Total LBP Cost Estimate $ 91,746

7.3 PCB AND MERCURY DISPOSAL BUDGET COST ESTIMATES

PCB & MERCURY ESTIMATED ABATEMENT EXPENSE



Mercury-Containing Tube Lamps 1,800 lamps 1.25 $ 2,250

Florescent Light Ballasts 400 ballasts 10.50 $ 4,200

55-Gallon Drums Suspect Hydraulic Fluid 5 drums 650 $ 3,250

Total Cost Estimate $ 9,700

7.4 UST SYSTEM REMEDIATION BUDGET COST ESTIMATES

ESTIMATED UST REMEDIATION EXPENSE



Site Characterization 1 12,000 $ 12,000

UST Removal & Soil Disposal 8,000 3.75 gal. $ 30,000

UST Closure Analysis & Reporting 1 5,000 $ 5,000


7.5 MOLD & PIGEON DROPPING REMEDIATION BUDGET COST ESTIMATES

MOLD & PIGEON DROPPING CONTAMINATED MATERIAL



Mold-Contaminated Surfaces 20,000 0.85 sf $ 17,000

Pigeon Dropping Contaminated Materials 12,000 2.30 sf $ 27,600



23

8. RECOMMENDATIONS

Building materials containing greater than one percent (>1%) regulated asbestiform minerals are considered asbestos-containing materials as defined by USEPA in 40 CFR Chapter 61, Subpart M and OSHA Standard 1926.1101. Moreover, OSHA also regulates worker protection standards for those building materials containing equal to or less than one percent (


24

Recommended options for the abatement and disposal of lead-based paints that exceed the USEPA hazardous waste standard are available. These include non-methylene chloride paint strippers such as LEAD-OUT Paint Stripper products which are designed to react at the molecular level with lead and other heavy metals to render them non-hazardous allowing for inexpensive disposal. Waste profile sampling is still required prior to disposal as non-hazardous waste. This technology would be considered an engineering control to assist in the reduction of worker lead exposure.

OSHA has regulations governing construction worker exposure to lead. Employers of construction workers engaged in the repair, renovation, removal, demolition, and salvage of structures and materials (building components) are responsible for the development and implementation of a worker protection program in accordance with 29 CFR Part 1926.62. This lead hazard program is essential to minimize worker risk of lead exposure. Employers must be in compliance with OSHAs lead standard at all times.

The USEPAs National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) [73 FR 66964, Nov 12, 2008] for ambient lead concentrations is 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter of air (g/m3). This standard air concentration would be a concern during any renovation or demolition event due to the poor condition of identified lead coatings. Disposal of lead-containing waste must be performed in accordance with Georgia EPD Solid Waste Management regulations.

Georgia EPD regulates all lead-based paint abatement activities associated with target housing and/or child occupied facilities; only Georgia EPD certified lead abatement contractors should perform abatement activities associated with target housing or child occupied facilities under properly controlled conditions.

Suspect mercury-containing florescent lamps were observed throughout the building. Suspect stored PCB-containing light ballasts were observed in various locations of the building including, but not limited to, custodian closets, bathrooms and storage areas. In addition, five (5) unlabeled 55-gallon steel drums apparently containing waste oil were observed on the first floor adjacent to the elevator area. Due to limited labeling, the drums may contain hydraulic fluid with the potential to contain PCBs. Additional investigations may be required to confirm the presence of the suspect mercury and PCBs within these components and drums. PCB waste is defined in 40 CFR, Part 761. Mercury-containing waste is defined in 40 CFR, Part 273. Used mercury-containing florescent lamps and PCB equipment should be carefully removed by qualified personnel and packaged for recycling in accordance the EPA 40 CFR 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management regulations.

Both OSHA and Georgia EPD regulate proper worker training, handling and disposal of PCB and mercury-containing materials. ACT recommends that obsolete PCB and mercury-containing equipment should be carefully removed by qualified personnel and packaged for recycling in accordance the Universal Waste Management regulations. PCB and mercury-containing equipment not listed in this report may be present in concealed or in accessible areas of the building.

ACT investigation discovered evidence of UST systems including several unidentifiable vent pipes extending from the ground level to the roof. These vent pipes can be observed in the rear (south) driveway area. Photographs have also been included in the appendices.



25

Currently, the Bell Building is abandoned and visual observations indicate that the buildings interior spaces have been unconditioned for a number of years. Numerous areas of moisture intrusion related to roof leaks and exterior envelope breaches were observed throughout the building. The moisture intrusion and unconditioned interior spaces has resulted in numerous large areas of mold growth observed on interior wall, floor and ceiling surfaces. Elevated concentrations of target mold species, such as Chaetomium, Fusarium, Memnoniella, Stachybotrys, and Trichoderma should not be found indoors. These species can influence allergic hypersensitivity responses and symptoms of asthma in certain individuals.

Likewise, large areas of accumulated pigeon dropping contamination were noted in various interior areas of the breached building envelope. Histoplasmosis and Cryptococcus disease fungus spores are emitted from nutrient-rich accumulations of pigeon droppings. Pigeon dropping contamination can cause serious health risks that arise from exposure to these airborne disease organisms.

ACT recommends that all visible mold growth and pigeon droppings be removed by a qualified mold remediation contractor in accordance with a detailed Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to prevent the spread of mold and/or pigeon waste contamination. The RAP should address the removal of molded, moist and stained building materials using precautions similar to those required for asbestos and lead removal to reduce the potential for further contamination.

ACM & LBP Investigation Report 11.01.001

Appendix A

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIAL LOCATION DIAGRAMS

Asbestos Thermal System Insulation Locations

Basement Mechanical Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015

Georgia State University

Bell Building 25 Auburn Avenue; Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia

Figure No.1

Not to Scale

Basement

Mechanical Area

B-1

North

LEGEND

Pipe Insulation In Chases

Utility Tunnel

B-2

Rear S

tairwell

T Deck

Entrance

Susp

ect

Underg

round S

torag

e Tan

k P

it

Asbestos Waterproofing Mastic Locations

Basement Mechanical Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.2

Not to Scale

Basement

Mechanical Area

B-1

North

LEGEND

Asbestos Waterproofing Mastic

Utility Tunnel

B-2

Rear S

tairwell

T Deck

Entrance

Susp

ect

Underg

round S

torag

e Tan

k P

it


1st Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.3

Not to Scale S

outh

Stairw

ell

North Stairwell

/Elevator Lobby

1-14

Air Handler

Room

1-25

Boiler Room

1-7

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1

Boiler Room

Store

1-8

Boiler Room

Office

1-10

Showers & Restrooms

Mechanical Room

1-13

A/H Room

Office

1-12

Store Room

1-5

Store Room

1-11

Store Room

1-2

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1A 1-3

1-4

Rear S

tairwell

1-9

1-15

1-16

1-18A

1-21 1-22

1-19

1-2

0

1-23

North

LEGEND


Thermal System Insulation

Crawl Space

1-17 Crawl Space

1-18

Suspect ACM Burner Rope

Asbestos Flooring Location Diagram

1st Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.4

Not to Scale S

outh

Stairw

ell

North Stairwell

/Elevator Lobby

1-14

Air Handler

Room

1-25

Crawl Space

1-17

Boiler Room

1-7

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1

Boiler Room

Store

1-8

Boiler Room

Office

1-10

Showers & Restrooms

Mechanical Room

1-13

A/H Room

Office

1-12

Store Room

1-5

Store Room

1-11

Store Room

1-2

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1A 1-3

1-4

Rear S

tairwell

1-9

1-15

1-16

Crawl Space

1-18

1-18A

1-21 1-22

1-19

1-2

0

1-23

North

LEGEND

Floor Covering Locations

Asbestos Wall Materials Location Diagram

1st Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.5

Not to Scale S

outh

Stairw

ell

North Stairwell

/Elevator Lobby

1-14

Air Handler

Room

1-25

Crawl Space

1-17

Boiler Room

1-7

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1

Boiler Room

Store

1-8

Boiler Room

Office

1-10

Showers & Restrooms

Mechanical Room

1-13

A/H Room

Office

1-12

Store Room

1-5

Store Room

1-11

Store Room

1-2

Sorting Bin

Area

1-1A 1-3

1-4

Rear S

tairwell

1-9

1-15

1-16

Crawl Space

1-18

1-18A

1-21 1-22

1-19

1-2

0

1-23

North

LEGEND

ACM Wall Material Locations

(Joint Compounds, Caulks & Glazing's)

2-9

South

Stairw

ell

2-1

0

North

Stairw

ell

2-7

Restroom

2-11

Mechanical

Room

2-8

Elevator

Lobby

2-5

Mezzanine

Level

2-3

Rear S

tairwell

2-1 Original Structure

2-2

Newer Addition

2-4 2-4A

2-6

North

Not to Scale


2nd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.6

LEGEND



ACM Glass Foam Riser Pipes

2-9

South

Stairw

ell

2-1

0

North

Stairw

ell

2-7

Restroom

2-11

Mechanical

Room

2-8

Elevator

Lobby

2-5

Mezzanine

Level

2-3

Rear S

tairwell


2-2

Newer Addition

2-4 2-4A

2-6

North

Not to Scale

Asbestos Flooring Location Diagram

2nd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.7

LEGEND

Black Floor Mastic Locations

2-9

South

Stairw

ell

2-1

0

North

Stairw

ell

2-7

Restroom

2-11

Mechanical

Room

2-8

Elevator

Lobby

2-5

Mezzanine

Level

2-3


2-2

Newer Addition

2-4 2-4A

North

Not to Scale


2nd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.8

LEGEND



2-6

2-6

Rear S

tairwell


North

Stairw

ell

3-5

South

Stairw

ell

3-6

Elevator

Lobby

3-3 Roof Top

Open Area

3-7

Rear S

tairwell Original Structure

3-1

Newer Addition

3-2

3-4

North

Not to Scale

3rd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.9

LEGEND




North

Stairw

ell

3-5

South

Stairw

ell

3-6

Elevator

Lobby

3-3 Roof Top

Open Area

3-7

Rear S


3-1

Newer Addition

3-2

3-4

North

Not to Scale

Asbestos Column Mastic Location Diagram

3rd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.10

LEGEND

Black Column Mastic Locations

North

Stairw

ell

3-5

South

Stairw

ell

3-6

Elevator

Lobby

3-3 Roof Top

Open Area

3-7

Original Structure

3-1

Newer Addition

3-2

3-4

North

Not to Scale


3rd Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.11

Rear S

tairwell

LEGEND



Roof Flashing Locations

North

Stairw

ell

4-8

South

Stairw

ell

4-9

Elevator

Lobby

4-6

Office Area

4-2

Air Handler Room

4-3

Restroom

4-5

Roof Top

Open Area

Rear S


4-1

Newer Addition

4-4

4-7

North

Not to Scale


4th Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.12

LEGEND




North

Stairw

ell

4-8

South

Stairw

ell

4-9

Elevator

Lobby

4-6

Office Area

4-2

Air Handler Room

4-3

Restroom

4-5

Roof Top

Open Area

Original Structure

4-1

Newer Addition

4-4

4-7

North

Not to Scale


4th Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.13

Rear S

tairwell

North

Stairw

ell

4-8

South

Stairw

ell

4-9

Elevator

Lobby

4-6

Office Area

4-2

Air Handler Room

4-3

Restroom

4-5

Roof Top

Open Area

Rear S


4-1

Newer Addition

4-4

4-7

North

Not to Scale

Asbestos Mastic Location Diagram

4th Floor Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.14

LEGEND

Black Column Mastic Locations

Black Floor Mastic Locations

Spline Ceiling Glue Dots

North

Stairw

ell

South

Stairw

ell

Elevator MCC

Room

A-1 Roof Top

Open Area

Rear S


West

Newer Addition

East

North

Not to Scale

Attic Mechanical Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.15

LEGEND




North

Stairw

ell

South

Stairw

ell

Elevator MCC

Room

A-1 Roof Top

Open Area

Rear S


West

Newer Addition

East

North

Not to Scale


Attic Mechanical Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.16

LEGEND



Coolin

g

Tow

er

Cooling Tower

Shed

North

South

Stairw

ell

North

Stairw

ell

Rear S

tairwell

Original Structure

2-2

Newer Addition

2-4

Not to Scale

Roof Area Asbestos Locations

Roof Level

Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015



Figure No.17

LEGEND

Parapet Stone Coping Mastic

Roof Flashing & Patch Mastic Locations

Asbestos Cement Corrugated Wall Panels

Elevator MCC

Roof

ACM & LBP Investigation Report 11.01.001

Appendix B

APPENDIX B

SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHS

Bell Building Demolition Project (101-68-15) A.C.T. Services, Inc. 25 Auburn Avenue, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia Hazardous Building Materials Report ACT Project No. 15.11.001 June 24, 2015

Page 1 of 5

1. The Bell Building is located at 25 Auburn Avenue,

Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia. 2. The 4-story brick building with concrete basement

is of 1920 & 1930 construction. Windows and doors contain asbestos glazing and caulks.

3. The original building (circa 1920s) roof was

deteriorated. Parapet, curb and equipment flashings, and coping mastic contain asbestos.

4. The east & south building additions (circa 1930s) roof parapet, curb and equipment flashings, and coping mastic contain asbestos.

5. Asbestos corrugated cement wall panels were

observed on the cooling tower structures and equipment.

6. Asbestos, mold, animal waste, and deteriorated wood support structures were observed in the buildings attic area.


Page 2 of 5

7. Deteriorated asbestos insulation was observed in

the attic space along the buildings pipe systems which feed the column pipe chases.

8. Fiberglass batting insulation contaminated with asbestos debris and pigeon droppings was observed throughout the attic.

9. Deteriorated steam vessel asbestos insulation was

observed in the attic. 10. Asbestos insulated pipes were observed inside wall

chases.

11. Asbestos containing black floor mastic was

observed under dust and debris in various locations throughout the building.

12. Observed hazardous building conditions include crumbling plaster, lead-based paint, molded ceiling and walls, asbestos pipe insulation, and broken fluorescent light fixtures.


Page 3 of 5

13. Observed hazardous building conditions include

deteriorated asbestos building materials and lead painted building components.

14. Observed hazardous building conditions include deteriorated molded asbestos containing wallboard system and asbestos pipe insulations.

15. Deteriorated asbestos pipe insulation was observed

in various sizes throughout the buildings mechanical systems.

16. Black foam glass steam line pipe insulation with asbestos black mastic was observed throughout the buildings mechanical systems.

17. Molded asbestos wallboard systems were observed

at various locations within the building. 18. Asbestos containing caulk and lead paint was

detected on the buildings perimeter metal doors.


Page 4 of 5

19. Asbestos floor tiles and black mastic was observed

at various locations within the building. 20. Suspect asbestos gasket rope was observed in

Room 117 crawl space of the first floor fresh air heating equipment.

21. The first floor air handler unit system is insulated

with an asbestos jacket over fiberglass. 22. Asbestos cloth dampener/isolator and asbestos

insulated pipe systems were observed in the first floor

Bell Building Hazardous Material Report, June 2015

Documents