BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO ...

BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA

Court:

Hearing:

Appearances:

Date of Decision:

Date of Issue:

IN THE MATTER

AND

BETWEEN

AND

Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 178

of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act)

of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act

508 CHAPEL ROAD PARTNERSHIP TRUST

AppellanUApplicant

(ENV-2018-AKL-281)

AUCKLAND COUNCIL

Respondent

Judge J A Smith Commissioner A C E Leijnen Commissioner M Mabin

7 and 9 October 2019

Ms Stienstra for Chapel Road Partnership Trust (the Trust) Ms A Buchanan for Auckland Council (the Council)

7 November 2019

7 November 2019

ORAL DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT

A: The appeal is allowed , and the consent is granted on the terms and conditions

annexed hereto and marked A.

B: That neither party makes any application for costs. Accordingly, costs lie where

they fall.

REASONS

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the whole of a decision by Commissioners refusing

consent of the establishment of a childcare centre at Chapel Road in Flat Bush, Auckland.

[2] The parties were unable to resolve the matter at mediation but just prior to the

CHAPEL ROAD PARTNERSHIP TRUST v AUCKLAND COUNCIL

2

matter being heard by the Court on the week of 7 October, they advised that they had

reached agreement. Subsequently a memorandum and draft consent order was

produced to the Court.

[3] The Court had other matters pending and suggested that the parties may wish to

look at the memorandum and consent order to try and put it in a form that would probably

be more acceptable to the Court. Parties have done this, and the Court proceeded to

determine this matter on the basis of the uncontested statements and joint memorandum

filed by the parties.

The issues

[4] This was an application for a childcare centre which was refused at first instance

largely based upon concerns by Commissioners in relation to impacts of traffic on a small

cul-de-sac, Campile Close. This was particularly having regard to matters under E27 of

the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP). The Transport Provisions, and also in relation to H5,

the chapter in relation to residential activities within the Residential Mixed Housing Urban

zone.

[5] The application for consent was for some 60 children and occupies a site of some

977 square metres on the corner of Chapel Road and Smales Road, Flat Bush. Both

roads are arterial roads and carry substantial traffic volumes. Campile Close would be

used however, to access the facility and that has no particular status being a residential

road serving a small number of sites , approximately eleven including the subject site.

Background

[6] The site has on it a heritage building (dairy factory manager's cottage) , as well as

a rundown steel garage. The heritage building is currently in a dilapidated condition. The

balance of the site is set effectively in long grass.

[7] The application includes upgrading the heritage building, as we understand it,

removing the steel-clad garage and essentially providing a purpose-built facility to cater

for the childcare activity on the site. It appears that the heritage building may be either

incorporated or used as part of the operation in some way, whether or not for direct

activities or for other is not so clear to the Court.

3

The Commissioners decision

[8] The Commissioners, in deciding the application, largely accepted the activity

would be generally acceptable in this area. Their concerns largely turned on the traffic

impacts. For practical purposes their findings acknowledged that non-residential

activities were provided for, provided they could keep the amenity of the neighbourhood

and support social and economic wellbeing. To that end, they had no difficulty in

accepting that this activity type and the scale were anticipated within the zone. To that

end, they also accepted that it would not detract from the vitality of the business centre

and it was considered as a restricted discretionary activity largely because there were

more than ten children to be accommodated on site plus some eight staff.

[9] A number of issues were accepted by the Commissioners including impacts upon

infrastructure. They also seemed to accept that issues related to neighbourhood

character and residential amenity and surrounding residential areas were met so far as

it related to the buildings and activity.

[1 O] Where they had a concern was in relation to the traffic effects of the activity and

its consequent potential effect on amenity. That issue is covered probably most clearly

at [79] where they say:

While the scale and intensity of the development is compatible with that anticipated by the MHU zone, we have concluded that the proposed access arrangement lo the facility located at the end of a narrow cul-de-sac, a pattern of additional non-residential traffic on these local roads will adversely affect the amenity and character of the surrounding residential sites.

The scope of this hearing

[11] Although the appeal had been expressed as appealing against the whole of the

decision, at the hearing Ms Stienstra acknowledged that they did not dispute most

findings of the Commissioners and in fact the joint witness statements had been

predicated upon and accepted those conclusions whilst going on to address the impact

of traffic both in general terms and more specifically on the amenity and character of the

residential sites. Ms Buchanan for the Council agreed.

[12) With the containment of the issues in contention, this largely restricts our

concerns to one about the traffic issues under E27 and the potential effects of those traffic

issues on residential character and amenity under H5 AUP.

4

The evidence as to traffic

[13] There have been a number of amendments agreed between the traffic experts

which are now incorporated into the application . Our understanding is the joint witness

statement (JWS) from 17 April 2019 formed the basis for subsequent discussions

between the planners. Although the JWS goes through the background, the importance

is that the parties have moved through these issues and eventually looked at the key

issues of contention. We briefly state these as access to the centre, car parking provision

and allocated parking spaces, car park design, car park analysis and passing traffic on

the surrounding network.

[14] That discussion led to a discussion about some changes to the proposal. These

included additional car parking spaces and removing the centre band from the proposal

to increase the width for vehicle manoeuvres. It is then identified that the Council saw

benefits from these changes and as we understand it, this set the groundwork for the

discussion between the parties and subsequently between the joint traffic and planning

witnesses.

[15] When the planners and traffic engineers came to discuss this matter in their latest

statement of 9 October, it was predicated on expert caucusing in April and in particular

15 July. That July caucusing included not only the planners but also the transport experts

although this is not perhaps as clear as it should be as to who was there.

[16] The July joint expert witness discussions seem to be when the parties agreed on

various changes but those were relatively minor. In short, they were looking at transport

issues and accessible car park spaces. However, by the time of the joint witness

statement of 9 October, it appears that the amendments to the proposal had reached a

stage that the planning and traffic engineering witnesses were prepared to say at

paragraph 15 of that statement after mentioning the access arrangements for parking:

We have considered that the provision of additional car parking, and a change to the parking and access arrangements, together with a Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) and a review clause inserted into the conditions of consent would result in the activity being consistent with:

a. Chapter E27: E27.2(4); E27.3(17)(a) and (20); and b. Chapter H5: H5.2(4) and H5.3(8)(c) of the AUP(OP); and c. Satisfy the overarching outcome expressed in the MHU zone objectives and associated policies with respect of non-residential activities, which is to provide for the community's social, economic and cultural wellbeing, while being compatible with the scale and intensity of development anticipated by the zone so as to contribute to the amenity of the neighbourhood and the protection of residential character and amenity.

5

[17] The JWS goes on to identify that although the noise issues were not the reason

for refusal, they were satisfied with some amendments to the conditions and the noise

management plan that addressed that issue also. Ms Stienstra confirmed, ·as the

planners intimated, that the applicant had accepted those changes. The changes

suggested in this JWS, as we understand it, have now been incorporated into the

conditions of consent and various plans and documents which set out the activity to be

consented . The witness statements go on to say that given the agreements reached

they are satisfied that it meets chapter E27.

Residential amenity

[18) The key issue then turned on residential amenity and the scope of that

consideration for the Court. The narrowing of the appeal to only those issues adverse to

the applicant on traffic matters is, we understand, consistent with matters of residential

amenity and neighbourhood character which concerned the Commissioners and related

primarily to traffic effects .

[19) Given that those matters have been largely addressed as we have noted, the

effect on amenity and character must be lessened. The planners are satisfied that we

need to consider that in the context of permitted and anticipated development of this

zone. The Residential MHU zone does anticipate quite a marked increase in intensity

over that of residential zones in the past and although there are constraints because of

the heritage overlay on this site, it must be said that the character and amenity of this

area will become more intensive as that zone incorporates/assimilates in the surrounding

area.

[20) In their JWS of 9 October, the witnesses go on to consider traffic and the

residential amenity issue and conclude that, although there will be an increase in traffic

that is in the context of an overall anticipated increase in traffic, that does not necessarily

create significant adverse effects.

[21) We agree with that conclusion and consider that in the context of the

intensification envisaged under the Residential MHU zone, this proposal as amended is

unlikely to have any effects beyond those that might be considered reasonable and

expected within the type of activities contemplated as restricted discretionary activities in

the zone.

6

Effects overall

[22] When we look at the actual impacts of this activity, we are satisfied that the overall

impact is acceptable. Under s104(1 )(a), we agree with the planners that that effect is

acceptable, and that this proposal meets the overall purpose of the Act. To that end, in

relation to Objective 4 of the MHU zone, we consider that the proposal now is compatible

with the scale and intensity of development anticipated by the zone so as to contribute to

the amenity of the neighbourhood will be met.

[23] We consider overall that childcare centres in this type of area are a benefit in

terms of the amenity they do contribute and also in respect of MHU zone Policy 8(c), this

proposal now is in keeping with scale and intensity of development anticipated within the

zone. To that end, we note that childcare centres are an inevitable consequence of

intensification of residential areas. Children are a consequence of people. The greater

the intensity of people the more likely it is that these types of support facilities are requ ired

and thus one cannot say it is any surprise that this would be the second to locate in such

an area nor does anyone suggest there is.

Other issues

[24] Related to the heritage overlay we consider that the provisions of this consent

encourage and enable maintenance and repair and we consider that to be a positive

outcome and to that extent overall we are satisfied that the outcomes will be positive, of

course for the purposes of this discretionary activity we only need to be satisfied that it

meets the purposes of the Plan and Act and the relevant criteria.

[25] We have had regard to all the criteria and there are many of them, most of them

have been mentioned and we have looked at those. These essentially relate to questions

of compatibility, so we have considered broadly if this activity now proposed would be

compatible in this residential neighbourhood.

[26] We conclude it is not only compatible, childcare centres are an inevitable

component of such a zone. That being the case, we are satisfied the proposal meets the

purpose of the Act and of course the Plan including the objectives, policies, rules and

other criteria as now proposed.

7

Conclusion

[27] We have some issues with the wording of the conditions, but we are satisfied that

conditions can easily be amended to meet concerns discussed with the parties.

[28] Rather than going through those in detail, we outlined our concerns (which were

minor in nature) to allow for improvement of that wording. We are satisfied from the

information of both Ms Stienstra and Ms Buchanan that that matter can be rectified

collaboratively between them quickly and we anticipate attaching to this decision the final

wording of those conditions as filed by Ms Stienstra in the next few days.

[29] Accordingly , consent is granted on the conditions broadly following the 9 October

JWS document. These conditions are now attached as A. There is no issue as to costs

and no order is sought or made.

For the court:

Annexure A

RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS

1. The childcare centre shall be carried out in accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the application, detailed below, and all referenced by the Council as consent number LUC60292090.

Amended application cover letter by Campbell Brown Planning Limited, dated 20 April 2018. Application Form and Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Campbell Brown Planning Limited, dated 20 April 2018.

Report title and reference Author Rev Dated

508 Chapel Road, Flat Bush, Auckland: Clough & Associates March 2017 Heritage Impact Assessment (updated

09/2017 and

12/2017) Acoustic Report Earcon Acoustics B March 2018

Traffic Report for Resource Consent, 60- Clearway Consulting 20/04/2018 --11

Care Centre, 508 Chapel Road, Flat Bush Infrastructure Report Antrim Consultants 28/02/2018

RC-01 Planning Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019 RC-02 Earthworks Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-03 Site/ Drainage Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-04 Landscape Plan Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019 RC-05 Ground Floor Plan Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-06 First Floor Plan Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-07 North & West Elevations Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019 RC-08 South & East Elevations Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-09 South Elevation Cottage Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019 RC-1 ci East & 'North Street Elevations Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

RC-11 Existing site/Demolition Origin Architects NZ 06/06/2019

2. Under section 125 of the RMA, this consent lapses five years after the date it is granted unless: a. The consent is given effect to; or b. The council extends the period after which the consent lapses.

3. The consent holder shall pay the council an initial consent compliance monitoring charge of $990 inclusive of GST), plus any further monitoring charge or charges to recover the actual and reasonable costs incurred to ensure compliance with the conditions attached to this consent.

dvice note:

he initial monitoring deposit is to cover the cost of inspecting the site, carrying out

tests, reviewing conditions, updating files, etc., all being work to ensure compliance with the resource consent. In order to recover actual and reasonable costs,

monitoring of conditions, in excess of those covered by the deposit, shall be charged

at the relevant hourly rate applicable at the time. The consent holder will be advised of the further monitoring charge. Only after all conditions of the resource consent

have been met, will the council issue a letter confirming compliance on request of the

consent holder.

Pre-development conditions

Temporary Traffic Management Plan

4. Prior to commencing any works on site, the consent holder shall submit a Temporary Traffic Management Plan (TTMP) to Council's Team Leader Monitoring (Southern) for certification. The TTMP shall be prepared in accordance with the New Zealand Transport Agency's 'Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management (COPTTM)' and no works shall commence until the TTMP is approved.

Landscape plans and maintenance

5. Prior to commencement of any works on site, a finalised set of landscape and pavement plans shall be submitted to Council for the written certification by the Team

Leader Monitoring (Southern). The finalised plans shall be generally consistent with the landscape design intent/ objectives identified in the plans and information referenced at condition 1 and shall include:

• Landscape plan and specifications; • Planting schedule, detailing the specific planting species, the number of plants

provided, locations, heights/Pb sizes; • One additional specimen tree (min size pb95) to be planted within the front yards

of both the Smales Road and Chapel Road site frontages. The -trees shall be selected to provide for a reasonable canopy spread and summer shade;

• Pavement plan and specifications, detailing materiality and colour throughout the development site;

• Irrigation details; and • A management/maintenance programme, in particular details of maintenance

methodology and frequency, allowance for replacement of plants, including specimen trees in case plants are severely damaged / die over the first five years of the planting being established.

Annexure A proposed conditions (clean)(5029407.l).docx

Landscape design should be aimed at mitigating the effects of development and car parking on the surrounds of the cottage.

Heritage

6. Prior to any works commencing on the site, the consent holder shall provide a copy

of the Authority approved under the Heritage New Zealand Pou here Taonga Act 2014 to the Team Leader Monitoring (Southern).

7. Prior to alterations to the Dairy Factory Manager's Cottage, the consent holder shall appoint a suitably qualified archaeologist or heritage advisor to prepare an archaeological record, including photographs, of the Dairy Factory Manager's Cottage. That record shall be completed and sent to the Team Leader Built Heritage, Plans and Places, Auckland Council prior to alterations commencing.

Development in progress conditions

Erosion and sediment control

8. All earthworks shall be managed to ensure that no debris, soil, silt, sediment or sediment laden water is discharged beyond the subject site to either land or stormwater drainage systems. In the event that a discharge occurs, works shall cease immediately and the discharge shall be mitigated and/or rectified to the satisfaction of the Team Leader Monitoring (Southern).

Dust suppression

9. There shall be no airborne or deposited dust beyond the subject site as a result of the construction activities, which in the opinion of the Team Leader Monitoring (Southern) is noxious, offensive or objectionable.

Transport

10. The new driveway, parking spaces and manoeuvring area shall be formed, sealed, marked and drained in accordance with drawing R20 (refer update August 2006) of the Council's 'Current Engineering Standards' and the approved plans. A 1 m hatched marking shall be detailed at the end of the manoeuvre aisle.

11. The new vehicle crossing shall be constructed in accordance with drawing GD019 (refer for structural details only) of ATCOP Standards.

13. The proposed freestanding double-sided signs of size 1.2m width x 0. 7m height

(overall height 2.7m) shall be erected wholly within the site on Chapel Road and

Smales Road. The street address of the site shall be displayed below the main

message on the signs.

14. Lighting shall be designed to comply with chapter E24 of the AUP (OP), certified by a

professional electrical engineer, and implemented to the satisfaction of the Team

Leader Monitoring (Southern). The lighting shall thereafter be maintained in good

working order at all times.

Acoustic fence

15. The consent holder shall construct acoustically effective fencing along the boundaries

of the site to screen the outdoor play area as shown on Figure A 1 of the Earcon

Acoustics report (Rev B, March 2018) as lodged with the application. All acoustic

fencing shall be no less than 2m in height and shall have no gaps along its length or

at its base, including where it adjoins any other structure. The surface mass of the

fencing shall be no less than 10 kg/m2 with any timber palings overlapped or

battened. Any gate in the fencing shall comply with the minimum construction

specifications of this condition when closed and must remain closed during periods of

outdoor play.

16. The construction of the acoustic fence shall limit the number of posts required for that

portion of the acoustic fence which is situated in front of the principal elevation of the

Dairy Factory Manager's Cottage as far as is practicable.

Heritage

17. Upon the commencement of works for the alteration/demolition of the Dairy Factory

Manager's Cottage, a suitably qualified archaeologist or heritage advisor shall be

present to monitor alteration/demolition works on the Dairy Factory Manager's

Cottage, to record further details of the building identified during the work, and to

determine if any further evidence is discernible as to the date of construction of the

Dairy Factory Manager's Cottage. Where any such evidence is located, it shall be

recorded and sent to the Team Leader Built Heritage, Plans and Places, Auckland

Council.

Public utility services

18. The consent holder shall make adequate provision for the protection of existing public

drains. Any necessary repairs to the public drains that may be required as a

consequence of the works shall be the consent holder's responsibility.

Network utility services

Power and telephone services shall be installed underground within the road reserve ~

xure A proposed conditions (clean)(5029407.l).docx

area to provide suitably located service connections to the building.

Fencing

20. Fencing, being non-acoustic in nature, shall be completed in accordance with plans submitted with the resource consent and specified at Condition 1.

21. The non-acoustic fencing on the boundary with 8 Campile Close shall be constructed to 2m and be constructed of timber.

Post development conditions

Capacity

22. The childcare centre shall operate with no more than 60 children and eight (8) staff in attendance at any one time.

Hours of operation

23. The childcare centre shall not operate outside the hours of 07:00 - 18:00, Monday to Friday or at any time on public holidays. Administration, cleaning or maintenance of the premises are permitted outside of these hours.

Noise Management Plan

24. At least 20 working days prior to the childcare centre activity commencing the

consent holder shall engage a suitably qualified and experienced acoustic specialist to prepare a Noise Management Plan (NMP). A copy of the NMP shall be submitted to the Council's Team Leader Monitoring (Southern) for certification. The purpose of the NMP is to provide details of the measures to be put in place to meet noise levels specified in Condition 25, and the means by which their effectiveness will be monitored, and the procedures to manage and rectify any identified issues between the NMP and its implementation. The NMP shall address the following:

a. Relevant noise standards as specified in condition 25; b. Management of noisy activities inside the building ; c. Strategies to manage any particularly loud children; d. Procedures to ensure that any group singing and/or instrument playing is

restricted to inside use, whilst windows are closed; e. Strategies to minimise noise from the carpark; f. Management of noisy activities in the outdoor play areas; g. The location and height of any elevated play structures in the outdoor play

areas; The use of resilient material such as artificial turf or matting or similar material on hard surfaces and/or decks used for outdoor play; Use of storage sheds (play houses) and covered shade areas to provide

acoustic shielding;

j . Complaint management processes; and k. Adequate staff supervision of children.

The consent holder shall comply with the NMP at all times, including any subsequent updates which shall also be prepared by a suitably qualified and

experienced acoustic specialist.

Noise

25. The noise (rating) level from all noise generated on the site during the hours of

operation shall comply with a noise limit of 55dB LAeq when measured within the

boundary of any neighbouring site (where the Prescribed Timeframe is from 7.00am

to 6.00pm). At all other times, the noise (rating) level from the site shall comply with

noise limits of 40dB LAeq and 75dB LAmax when measured within the boundary of

any neighbouring site. The measurement and assessment of noise shall be in accordance with the requirements of New Zealand standards NZS 6801 :2008

Acoustics - Measurement of environment sound and NZS 6802:2008 Acoustics -

Environment noise.

26. The acoustic fencing shall be maintained as an acoustically effective barrier for as long as this consent is given effect to.

Heritage

27. Upon completion of works, including works to the permanent heritage feature of the

site, interpretative material shall be displayed and visible from Chapel Road (when examined by pedestrians). Such material may explain the history of the site, the nature of the works, the alterations and other matters which took place at the Dairy Factory Manager's Cottage.

28. The type of display and its location, so as to be visible to pedestrians walking along

Chapel Road, shall be determined in consultation with the Team Leader Built Heritage, Plans and Places, Auckland Council.

Parking and Transportation

29. The consent holder shall make its best endeavours to ensure that staff of the

childcare centre do not use kerbside parking spaces in Campile Close.

30. Prior to commencement of the childcare centre activity, a Travel Demand

Management (''TDM") Plan shall be prepared by or on behalf of the consent holder that

a. Availability and management of on-site parking, maximising parking spaces for pick up and drop off purposes during drop off and pick-up times;

b. Measures to discourage staff parking within Campile Close (in accordance with

Condition 28); c. Identification of local bus services routes, such as bus numbers and contact

numbers for Auckland Transport to assist the use of public transport for staff

and users of the centre;

d. Location of on-site bicycle parking and changing facilities which the consent holder shall provide for staff;

e. An induction pack to be provided to guardians when enrolling children which

specifies that under no circumstances are guardians to park on yellow lines,

across driveways or within the turning head of Campi le Close when dropping off

or picking up children as this creates a safety and operational issue. Such information shall include that all pick up and drop off activities are to be

completed from the childcare carpark or from kerb side parking on adjacent

streets should parking spaces be temporarily unavailable in the carpark.

The TOM shall be available to staff of the childcare centre and shall be reviewed in

the event of a significant change(s) to the public transport services in the locality.

31. Under section 128 of the RMA, the conditions of this consent in respect of parking and transport management (Conditions 29 and 30) may be reviewed by the Manager

Resource Consents at the consent holder's cost either:

a. after twelve (12) months of the childcare centre being in operation with 50 or

more children enrolled and then thereafter annually for a three-year period; or

b. following receipt of a substantiated complaint(s) with respect to any consistent

observations of staff parking occurring in Campile Close, as verified by the Council's Team Leader Monitoring (Southern).

The purpose of such a review shall be to deal with any adverse parking or transport­related safety or operational effects which may arise from staff parking in Campile Close

and which it is appropriate to deal with at a laterstage.

32. The section 128 review under Condition 31 shall be undertaken by an experienced

transportation planner or traffic engineering consultant, as directed by the Council's Team Leader Monitoring (Southern). If the review directed under this condition identifies that the proposal is resulting in consistent incidents of staff parking in

Campile Close then the Team Leader Monitoring (Southern) may direct that the

consent holder undertake measures to address this situation, including but not limited

to:

a. A change to the allocation of on-site parking between staff and guardians; and b. A review of the TOM and amendments as necessary.

ure A proposed conditions (clean)(5029407.l).docx

Advice notes

1. Any reference to number of days within this decision refers to working days as defined in s2 of the RMA.

2. For the purpose of compliance with the conditions of consent, "the Council" refers to the Council's monitoring inspector unless otherwise specified. Please contact [email protected] to identify your allocated officer.

3. For more information on the resource consent process with Auckland Council see the Council's website www.aucklandcouncil.qovt.nz. General information on resource consents, including making an application to vary or cancel consent conditions can be found on the Ministry for the Environment's website: www.mfe.govt.nz.

4. The consent holder is responsible for obtaining all other necessary consents, permits, and licences, including those under the Building Act 2004, and the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. This consent does not remove the need to comply with all other applicable Acts (including the Property Law Act 2007 and the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015), regulations, relevant Bylaws, and rules of law. This consent does not constitute building consent approval. Please check whether a

building consent is required under the Building Act 2004.

5. Watercare Services Ltd advises that at the time of application for a water and/or wastewater connection (or application for demand increase), completed in

conjunction with a building consent, an Infrastructure Growth Charge shall apply. Details of this charge are available on the website www.watercare.co.nz.

6. Development contributions levied under the Local Government Act 2002 are payable in relation to this application. The consent holder will be advised of the development contributions payable separately from this resource consent decision. Further information about development contributions may be found on the Auckland Council website at www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

7. A vehicle crossing permit is required to be obtained from Auckland Transport prior to the construction of the vehicle crossing on existing public roads. See Auckland Transport's website https:/lat.govt.nzlabout-uslworking-on-the-roadlvehicle­crossingapplication/ for more information.

Annexure A proposed conditions (clean)(5029407.1).docx

Annexure B - Plans

caustic Fence Location Figure A 1: Proposed A .

CAMPILE CLOSE

-----

BvlLDING 2 l 3m2+ VERANDAH ~ FFL= 26.20

~81

I I

C I !,WI

I

I 1, § It I"' 11

~ ,,.. ,~ I I I

- I 'I

V <It< ,I

,I

Lor ,oe 01' ];'kAL DESCRIPTION !tlE o!AE",I,- 9~2

CAMPILE CLOSE

El(!SllNG KERB

25.5

EXTENT OF NEW 2.0M GlASS ACOUSTIC FENCE

SCREENED REF\JSE BINS

CHAPEL ROAD

The cop)flght to the,e drawing• ond part,, thereof remoln tile property

of Origin Architect:, NZ Limited and may not be copied Of atllerwi,e uoed without express permission. The contractor S'ldl cheek end wrlfy oll dimension:,. le'«lls and angles on Me prior to c:on,mencinCJ any wor1t.

Oimen,ions must not be scaled frtm drawings.

2.0m HIGH

~cWsiic FENCE

BUILDING ~-,-,--+""'tsL70m2+ VERANDAHS

n-r+r-'r7'---,-r-,,C,----,.-,c--'--+-.-,-,-,,...,.....,.,....,~ ~ FFL= 26.20 -~LOOEN

-~

188 37'

concrete

MIXED HOUSING URBAN ZONE -H5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING COVERAGE -CCC 27Crn2+'1ERANDAH 4-4m2+ COTTAGE 60m2= 37""12 •38:t OF SITE AREA OF 977m2 IMPERMEABLE SURFACES - PA"1NG 286m2 + BUILDING 37""12• 660m2

•67.5:t OF SlTE AREA OF 977 m2

I I

e I LIGHT I POLE I

I I lgi 11 I"' ~ z:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

MAX PERMITTED 60:t -NON COMPLIANT

LANDSCAPING -317m2• 32.5:t OF SlTE AREA OF 977m2 MIN IS 35:t THEREFCllE NON COMPLIANT

EARTHWORKS = REFER EARTHWORKS PLAN HR18- NO INFRINGEMENT MAX HEIGHT OF 11.0M NOT EXCEEDED

YARDS= NO INFRINGEMENT

El(!SllNG BUILDINGS-- REFER SlTE PLAN

ACOUSllC FENCNG - BOTH GLAZED AND TIMBER ACCJIJSllC FENCES ARE TO BE 2.DM IN HEIGHT 6: HA\£ A 10KG/M2 MINIMUM DENSlTY

0 <( 0 0:::

en w ...J <(

:::E en

6j.me2019

6may2019

23082018 20032018 16032018 Bm0f2018 7 DEC2017 5 OEC2017

11stPT2017

REISSUE FOR RC

CARPARK REV

YARD FIRE ESCAPE PA TH ADDED REISSUE Fal RC REISSUE FOR RC rev scheme

rev 60 OilLD ROil. RC ISSUE 60 OilLD ROil. RC ISSUE

50 CHILD ROil. RC ISSUE

LOT 108 OP 201577 SITE AREA= 977m2 NO DATE DESCRIPTION

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FlA T BUSH, AUCKIMD PLANNING 233

DATE 00: 2Dlfl

=1:200 ... ., SKETNo. REV.

RC-01

AROilTECTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD emaO: orl<Jln.orchitectureOgman.com

PO BOX 56 007. DOMINION ROAD. AUa<LAND 14-46 Telephone. (09) 631 54-4J

CAMPILE CLOSE

EXISTING KERS

CHAPEL ROAD

The cop)!'ight to these drawings and ports thereof remain the property

of Origin Archltocu NZ Umlted ond may not be copied or oth.,,.iao used without express permission. The contractor shdl check ~d verify oil dimensions, l~ls and angles on sltl!l prior to commencing any •ort. Dimensions must not be scaled from drawilgs.

en w u u <C

ENlRANCE STABILISER TO BE FORMED ..... ~)MMEDIAlaY UPON OPENING THIS

\),SECTION TO ROAD .., '¾> "MINIMUM SIZE 3m X 6m

0• '3-

\ii.T FENCE 12 50' (31.20)

---~ ,as 37'

concrete

\ 0 -=-) --

-~=""-b' ,..._a--a~l-::a--a=-"-~'";~ MARKINGS --- ,0

~

0

~ -----------7=====~ / / / \

I I

\ l I I

\

:5 g_ 0 ,2

e LIGHT I POL£ I

I I I I I

I

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577 SITE AREA= 977m2

SHEET Till£ DAtt DEC 20115

METAL AGGREGATE ON EXIT FROM SITE

ENTRANCE STABILISER REGUL.ARL Y REMOVE SOIL FROM AGGREGATE OR ADD CLEAN AGGREGATE

0 <C 0 a::: en w ...J <C ~ en

EARlH~KS:

SCRAPE = 187m2 ( 42m3) r:JJT/ BATTER= 337m2 {99m3) Flll.=125m2 ( 15m3) TOTAL EARlHWORKS= 649m2 (156m3)

6)1ne2019 20032018 16032018 8mar2018 7 DEC2017 5 DEC2017 11SEPT2017

NO DATE

REISSUE FOR RC REISSUE FOR RC REISSUE FOR RC rev scheme rev 60 ClfLO ROU RC ISSUE 60 CHlD ROU RC ISSUE REV RC ISSUE REDUCED ROU

DESCRIPTION

ARCHITECTS

NEW CHILDCARE CENlER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND EARTHWORKS SCW: 1: 200 ON Al

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD email: origln.archltectureOgmcll.com

!M[TNo. REV.

233 RC-02 PO BOX 56 DD7. DOMINION ROAD. AUCKLAND 1446

Telephone. (09) 631 5443

CAMPILE CLOSE

EXISTING KERB

The cop)'ighl to th= drawing, and port, th.,..,! nemoin the property

of Origin Archltecb NZ Li'Tlltecl and may not be copied or otherwise used without expreu perml,aioo. The conlnletor oholl ehedc ond fflify oll dimenalons. level• ond angles on site prior to commencing any wor1t. Dimensions must not be sccied from dnrolngo.

u 1i )( ".., a.

12 50' (31.20) 25.92 EXISllNG ______________ _x_ _________ _

,-I I I I

....Ai'"--f---'----'---7'===-==",-----'1

EXISTING ffi• 26.97

EXISTING HERITAGE 3000 COTTAGE NOW_,._-~

OUIDOOR PLAY

OU;[DOOR PLAY n,,, ~ --~

188 37'

concrete

', I

2.0m HIGH TIMBER ACOUSllC FENCE

BUILDING 70m2+ VERANDAHS ~FFL= 26.20

-~ '~

0

~

= 2845

0

LIGHT I ~ POLE I 2 I >- ~ I ~ Cl. I ~ z 0

I I i3 ,2 a,

I :Ii

,i!!i .!! >-

1: I I ~ z

Is-i"

:~ 12. re ,~ I I I

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 106 DP 201577 SllE AREA= 977m2

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND SITE / DRAINAGE

233

DA lE DEC 20US

=1:200CJIAJ 9ET No. REV.

RC-03

0 <( 0 0:: C/) w _J <( ~ C/)

6)Jne2019 20032018 16D32018 Bmor2D1B 7 DEC2D17 5 DEC2D17 115!:PT2017

NO DATE

REISSUE FOR RC REISSUE FOR RC REISSUE FOR RC reY scheme rev 60 CHILO Rau_ RC ISSUE 60 CHILO ROU. RC ISSUE REV RC ISSUE REDUCED ROU.

DESCRIPTION

ARCHITECTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ L TO email: ongln.arehlteetureOgmall.cam

PO BOX 56 007. DOMINION ROAD. AUCKLAND 1+16 Telephone. (09} 631 5443

CAMPILE CLOSE

LEGEND

EXISTING KERB

TrtokI,to8m(pb28)x1. KO\l/ha1,to10m,(pb28)x:2. Ng111O,t07m(pb28)x2. Flox,to1.8m,(pb5)x5.

E~clryono)(al!Sum

Sophoramiaophyllo Myoporuml1111tum Phormlumtonax GrillO!lnoo

Coproaml11ocero:!l:I

C11b011gotn:o

101.30m(pb5) x10.hodgo 11andcopro:iml11,groundcreoper(pb3)x30 11,:~tlngtortimaln

L11ndSC11f>!! themes. ~ndscap1ng1:,proposedlor screening ondwirdant amenity.

Notivospodosorcooloetodfor,ott11nd1611ndtolor.mco.

Specimen ~111 \MIi compl11menl 1110011 "xisUng spedmens on site, and prollide P degree of

5Clffnlngondunn,1tJonber.i.,,11nth11propo!Kldbulldlng11ondlhobound11r1es

SpccJos lllhict, •rti cndom1c 10 the local ereo oro recommended 10 bo sotcaod from IOCIII nur,enu.

ln1tnll1dlon & mono9omenl PJl)ntingMin,onAulumnto Spring

lmg1tof1rs1 eumrnerse,1110n, SteflllMCIIIIOOd. frootop •,OIi, Slow• rol11B1efortH!ser.

Ongoing weed manogcmcm.

CHAPEL ROAD

Tho copyn~t to the,e drawings ond ports thereof remain the properly

oi Origin Architects NZ Limited and may not be copied or atherwbe uoed without e,cpres, permisoion. The contractor ohcll chec.lt and ,erify all dimensions, leYda and angle, on site prior to commenci\g any work.

0lmenslons mu,t not be ,coled from drawings.

concrete

2.0m HIG!i TIMBER ACOUSTIC FENCE

BUILDING 70m2+ VERANDAHS ~FFL= 26.20

'~

'~

1 ~:;;.,,-:;;.,,-' G: e ------

0

l(/

0

LIGHT I

I POLE I

I i5

:5 I JD

! 0 I gi "-0 z

i ,2 I ~ .. I :::E

0 :.: ~ I iii C z 8 ls

1"0 12.

I~ I" I I I

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: - ___ - - - _, - - NSMT MARKINGS

'i.. LOT 108 DP 201577 SllE AREA= 977m2

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

A.AT BUSH, AUCKLAND LANDSCAPE PLAN

233

DATE DEC :m,g

SCAI£ 1: 200011 A3

SIET Ila. REV,

RC-04

Cl <C 0 0:::

Cl) w _J

<C ::::1! Cl)

6µno2019 REJSSUE FOR RC 200J2018 REISSUE FOR RC 16032018 REJSSUE FOR RC 8ma2018 rev scheme 7 OEC2017 rev 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 5 OEC2017 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 11SEl'T2017 REV RC ISSUE REDUCED ROLL

NO DA1E DESCRIPTION

ARCHITECTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD email: orlgin.archltectureOgmaO.com

PO BOX 56 007. DOMINION ROAD. AUCKLAND 14'46 Telephone. (09) 631 5"'43

PP.10USH REAR t/lS1l !iERITAGE)

DOORS ANO WALL .t REPt.AC( WITH t£W FULL HEIGHT DOORS REIIO'IE EXIS11NG WINDOIIS /

------tiil---, OPEN UP REAR .t SIDE Of COTTAGE TO FORM PART Of EXTERIOR PLAY

NOW COVERED OUTDOOR AREA

EXISTING=

.,___ EXISTING / RETURN T

-~ REMAIN

II PART WALLS ONLY II REMOVED TO A 11 2.0M HEIGHT

Q===== FFL=26.97 ,

II REMOVE ~G WINDOIIS ANO~LL .tREl'U,CE WITH DOORS

NEW WINDOW ,/

I

i I

('lllTH G PANELS) II

• REIIO'IE HEARTH -~ I ✓/

--~-~NDAH ___ _ _(~e!.. iM'Mler aeck laid over existing" corltret.11} _

REPAIR POSTS AS REQUIRED. 3000

COVERED CYCLE PARK

SLEEP 11 .5m2

12923

BOTTLE WARMER

10 OFF <2}'rS O 2.BmO = 28m2

STAFFROOM, OFFlCE. STORAGE ALL AT

FIRST FLOOR LE'IEl

FIRST FLOOR oVERI

'\ii I I I

FOYER

Bl BAGS

ART BENCH I / I

I I

I

I I

I I

I

50off >2YRS PLAY COMBINED @ 2.7•J2 =135M2

I

GLAZED BARRIER 1.0M HIGH

COVERED 15m2

VERANDAH CANTILEVERED CLEAR ROOF

I

I I

I

GI.AZED SCREEN

ART BENCH

I I

FFL= 26.20 3.0 M CD.ING HEIGHT

I I

/ EXTENT OF VOID I

VOID

~ .,

I STAIR ~ UP <

i C :z < 8 a::: ~

PERGOLA

I ----- -I ----- -

----- ------ -

I ----- -.!l~K ___

~

60 CHILDREN

10995 GROU D FLOOR 273m2 + VERANDAH/ CANOPY

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SITE AREA= 977m2

6.UNE2019 revRCis,ue

6may.2019 revRCcarparkRev 2003201B REV scheme FOR RC 1603201B REISSUE FOR RC 8mar201 B REV scheme

7 dec2017 REV 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 5 dcc2017 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 1158'T2D17 50 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE

NO DATE OESCRIP110N

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

DA.TE .lJNE 2DIB

SCAl.E 1: 100 ON Al

REV,

233 RC-05 The copyri!til lo these drawing, and perts thereof remain the property of Orlgi't

An:hltecb NZ Umlled and moy not be copied

« otherwise used without express permtsslon. The conlroctor sholl check ond ve,tfy oil dmenslons. leveis and angles on 1lte pr1or to commencing cmy work. Dimensions must not

be scaled from drawings.

ARCHllEClS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD omol: crt9ln.0rchltecturt19Qmall.com

PO BOX 515 007, DOMINION ROAD

AUCKLAND- 1448

Tel.phone. (OSI) 831 54-43

I

EJCISTING CHIMNEY

i

EXISTING ROOF TO COTTAGE

EJCIS11NG TTTAGE VERANDAH ROOF

-ROOF

r ROOF

5270 \ 5654

:::::::---, 1 I ll~ l ~ ~ 1 :i~=c====:::i=;::::=;:::::;-,f----. ------t-- _11

lr--­PERGOLA I -----r-

VOID lr--­lr--­lr-­lr-

-----1---_____ L_

1[

TORE: CHl'<t:5 00~

OFFlCE 4.90 X 4.0

B305

STAFFROOM

FFL= 29.515

BARRIER

I -----r------1---_____ L_

I -----r------1---_____ L _

I ----- r ------ 1-- -_____ L_

I -----r------1---

'

OUTRIGGERS -

FIRST FLOOR 99m2 excluding STAIR &: FEAlURE VOID

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SITE AREA= 977m2

6J.JNE2019 revRCiosue

6may.!019 revRCcarpari<Rev 2003201B REV scheme FOR RC 1603201B REISSUE FOR RC &nar201 B REV scheme

7 dec2017 REV 60 CHILD ROU RC ISSUE 5 doc:2017 60 CHILD ROU RC ISSUE 11SEPT2017 50 CHILD ROU RC ISSUE

NO DATE DESCRIP110N

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

SIEET 1T1lE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SCAIE 1: 100 ON Al

,Ill·~ SrEET No. REY.

233 RC-O6 The cop)fight to these drawings and perts

thereof remain the property of Origl\

Architects NZ Limited and may not be copied or other.Ia& used without expntSS permisakn

The controclor ohall check and vertfy all dimensions. le't'es and angles on site prkl" to commencing any work. Dimensions must not

be ocoled from drowlngs.

ARQ-lllEClS

ORIGIN ARCHITECT& NZ L TO omal: orlgln.archltectuniegmail.com

PO BOJC 51!1 007, DOMINION ROAD

AUCKLAND- 14'46

Te!ephono. (09) 631 5443

>­'~ I~ 15 I"'

: EXTERIOR PLAY I I

: 2.0M HIGH GLASS I ACOUSTIC FENCE I

FFL~26.2D

! EXISTING 24.730

EXTERIOR FINISH: SUPPLIED BY CLIENT CHILDCARE CENTER ROOF: LONGRUN CORRUGATED ROOFING-- COLOUR= GREY FRAIRS

WALLS: BRICK - lYPE AUTUMN BLEND RED VINTAGE le TENERIFE

JOINERY: SELECTED P.C. DOUBLE GLAZED ALUM- COLOUR = SIL'IER PEARL ENTRY/VERANDAH TIMBER- RESENE STAIN IROKO \\llOOS

COTTAGE ROOF: LONGRUN CORRUGATED ROOFING-- COLOUR= GREY FRAIRS

WAL!.S: WEAlliERBOARD /FASCIA- COLOUR RESENE MERINO

TIMBER JOINERY: COLOUR- SIL'IER PEARL

'IERANDAH POSTS:

COTTAGE NORlH ELEVATION

1.BOM HIGH GLAZED ACOUSTIC FENCE

WEST ELEVATION

EX1S11NG CHIMNEY

FORM NEW OPENINGS FOR DOORS NGL

NEW 'll£A lliERBOAR S

>-I~

:! I I I I

- __ I

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SITE AREA= 977m2

6J.JNE2D19 revRCissue

6may2019 revRCcarparkRev 20032D1B REV scheme FOR RC

Bmar2018 REV scheme

7 dec2017 REV 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 5 dec2017 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 11SEPT2D17 REV 50 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE

1.BOM HIGH GLAZED ACOUSTIC FENCE BElVtffN COTTAGE le CARPARK NO DATE DESCRIPTION

NGL

NOT SHOVIW FOR ct.ARllY

FORM NEW OPENINGS FOR FlXED il1NDOW FORM NEW OPENINGS

FOR DOORS

NORlH ELEVATION

1.BOM HIGH GLAZED FENCE BEll\EEN COTTAGE !c CARPARK

1;; < ,c

1"' I~ I I I I I I

' I 'I 2.bM HIGH GLASS A~OUSTIC FENCE

25.25 HRTB PT A

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

Sl£ET ll1LE

NORlH & WEST ELEVATIONS

DATE .u£ 20Ui

SCAl.E 1: 100 ON A3

SHEET No. REV.

233 RC-O7 The cop)11~t to these drawings and pens thereof remain the property of Origin

Archttects NZ Umlted and may not be copied

or otherwise used without express permbolon. The contractor shall check and verify all dimensions, levds and angles on site prior to commencing any wort. Dimensions must not be scaled from drawilgs.

ARCHl"TtCTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECT& NZ LTD cmoll: origk1.an:hlteetu~moa.com

PO BOX !58 007, DOMINION ROA.0

AUCK1.AND- 1446 Telephone. (09) 631 5443

>- I ~I ~I

I

EAST ELEVATION COTTAGE COLOUR SCHEME NOTE lliAT lliE F\Jl\JRE COTTAGE COLOURS 'MLL BE A CONDITION OF lliE RESOURCE CONSENT a: 'MLL BE SUB..ECT TO APPROVAL OF HERITAGE DIVISION

EXISTING CHIMNEY

EXISTING CORRUGATED IRON ROOF

NGL

2.0M HIGH GLAZED ACOUSTIC FENCE EXISTING COTTAGE

I·

EXTERIOR F1Nl9i: SUPPLIED BY CLIENT CHILDCARE CENTER ROOF: LON GRUN CDRRUGA TED ROOFlNG- COLOUR= GREY FRAIRS

·1

GUTTER= 32.40 ____ _

GUTTER= 29.945

TIMBER PLATFORM

WALl.S: BRICK - TYPE AUl\JMN BLEND RED "1NTAGE a: TENERIFE BOARD ~ISB1J.Nfu

JOINERY: SELECTED P.C. DOUBLE GLAZED ALUM- COLOUR • SILVER PEARL ENTRY/VERANDAH TIMBER- RESENE STAIN IROKO WDOOS

COTTAGE

ROOF: LONGRUN CORRUGATED ROOFING- COLOUR= GREY FRAIRS

WALl.S: WEA lliERBOARD /FASCIA- COLOUR RESIENE MERINO

TIMBER JOINERY: COLOUR- SILVER PEARL

VERANDAH POSTS: COLOUR- RESENE MERINO NGL

EXISTING CHIMNEY

1.BM HIGH tuZED Acouslc FENCE

MAX

CANTI= VERANDAH ROOF STRUCl\JRE Willi A CLEAR ROOFING

BRICK VENEER

OPEN VERANDAH BEYOND

26.20

29.515

2.0M HIGH GLAZED I ACOUSTIC FENCE

NGL

COTTAGE SOUlH ELEVATION

SOUlH ELEVATION

CORRUGATED IRON ROOFlNG AT 10 OEG

10 FORM STAIRS

I

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SITE AREA= 977m2

6JUNE2019 revRCis,ue

6may2019 revRCcarparidlov 2003201 B REV scheme FOR RC

Bmar201B REV scheme

7 doc2017 REV 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE S dec2017 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 11SEPT2D17 REV SD CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE

NO DATE DESCRIPTION

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

SHEET ll1LE

SOUlH & EAST ELEVATIONS

DATE .ME 2018

sr.N..E 1: 100 II< Al

R£V.

233 RC-08 Tho cop)l"lght to th ... drawings and part,

thereof romoln the property of Origin

Architects NZ Limltcd and may not be copied

or oth..-.be used without express permission. The contractor sholl check and vertfy all dimensions. le:YCls and angles on site prior to commencing ony work. Oi'nenslons must not

be 9C0lcd from drawings.

AAOillECTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD .,..an: or~ln.orchltecbJ~an.eom

PO BOX 50 007, OOWINIOH IIOAD

AUO<LAHt>- 14-48

r....,hono. (OIi) 831 5443

NEW BUILD SOUTH ELEVATION

1200

xxxxxxxx CHILDCARE CENTER

PHONE: XXXXX 508 CHAPEL RD -

l'.j

~ u I;; § <

! 8 N

i3 :f

i!! "'

RE:ral SIGN 'tlSIJAL SUPPLIED BY OWNER TWO SIDED SIGNAGE PANEL

ELEVATION SIGNAGE

2.0M HIGH G..AZED ACOUSTIC FENCE -

EXTERIOR PLAY

COTTAGE SOUTH ELEVATION

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SITE AREA= 977m2

6J.JNE2019 revRCi""e

6moy2019 revRCccrparldlev 20032018 REV sdleme FOR RC

Bmar2018 REV sdleme

7 doc2017 REV 60 CHILD RO!.L RC ISSUE 5 dec2017 60 CHILD RO!.L RC ISSUE 11SEPT2017 EV 50 CHILD ROil RC ISSUE

NO DAlE DESCRIPTION

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

SHEET nn.E

SOUTH ELEVATION COTTAGE SUPERIMPOSED

DA.1£ JJNE 2fJ'I II

SCALE 1: 100 CJaAJ

J08No. R£V.

233 RC-09 The copyright ta th ... drawings md port, thereof remain the pr~erty of Origin

Archltecb NZ Limited and may not be copied

or otherwise used without expreu permission. Tho cantractar ohall choc:lc and verify all dinenslona, IIMII• and cngln 011 1110 prlar ta commena'lg any work. DIMnalons must not be scded from drawings.

ARCHllECTS

ORICilN ARCKTECT& NZ LTD .-noi: origln.crchltacturwDgmal.com

PO BOX 56 007, DOMINION ROAD

AUCICLAN[)... 1-Mtl

Telophana. (09) 1531 5443

!ii I ~I ~I

NGI.. AT COTTAGE BEYOND

I

I·

EAST ELEVATION

2. 70M HIGH DOUBLE SIDED STREET SIGN

EXISTING COTT AGE

NORTH ELEVATION

COTTAGE ~ANOAH SUPERIMPOSED

2.0M HIGH GLAZED ACOUSTIC FENCE WITH STEEL POSTS AT MAX 2.0M CC BUILT 0~ EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL

2.0M HIGH GLAZED ACOUSllC FENCE WITH STEEL POSTS AT MAX 2.0M CC BUILT 0~ EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL

NGL

POST COLOUR- GRAPHITE

2.0M GLAZED ACOUSTIC FENCE BET\IEEN STEEL POSTS ON TOP OF EXISllNG STONE RETAINING WALL

NGL

EXISllNG RETAINING WAl.l

ACOUSTIC FENCE SECTION

NGI..

2.70M HIGH DOUBLE SIDED ; STREET SIGN 1

\! I I

I I I I I ,_ I ~ I ~

m - 2s.20

L£GAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577

SIT£ AREA= 977m2

6..UNE2D19 revRCi!sue

6moy2019 revRCClllJ>orl<Rev 20032018 REV scheme FOR RC

8mor2018 REV scheme

7 dec:2017 REV 60 CHILO ROLL RC ISSUE 5 dec2017 60 CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE 11SEP12017 REV SD CHILD ROLL RC ISSUE

NO DATE DESCRIPTION

NEW CHILDCARE CENTER AT 508 CHAPEL RD

Fl.AT BUSH, AUCKLAND

~EET TITl£

EAST & NORTH STREET ELEVATIONS

DATE .I.NE 2DUI

SCALE 1: 100 <JI Al

51££1 No. REV.

233 RC-10 The copyright to these drawings and part! thereof reinoSI the property of Origin

Architects NZ l.inlted ond moy not be copied

or otherwise used without express permission. The controctor eholl check C11d vertfy oil dimensions, levels and angles on :1lte prior to commencing any work. Dimensions must not

be scaled from drawings.

ARCHITEClS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD email: or1gln.archltectur8egmaR.com

PO BOX 58 007, DOMINION ROAD

A.IJCKLAND- 1448

Tel~hone, (M) 831 5443

CAMPILE CLOSE

EXISTING KERB

25.5

CHAPEL ROAD

Tho cop)<l~I to lhe,o drawings and parta thereof remain tho property

of Origin Archllocts NZ Umlted and may not be copied or otherwise used without •"!'res, pennlsslon. The conlroctor shall check and wrlfy all cfmenslons, levels and angles on site prior to commencing any wort. Di'nenslona must not be scaled from drawings.

I

)

12 so· (31 .20) 0 g

I -------------·- ··-t=======B'

\ I

\ e I

LIGHT I ~

POL£ I S! I

I I

\ ,.. .c

~ [ I~ ~ 0 B .2 I~

l ., 1: ~ i I ::l I ~ < 8 ,. I "' z

\ :! ~

"' jJj

-~-~== 188 37'

11.08

~ concrete footpath

\ e ~:;;.;-:;;.-) G: --------

- __ - - - - ,o NSAAT MARKINGS 9-

NEW CHILDCARE CENlER AT 508 CHAPa RD

FLAT BUSH, AUCKLAND

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 108 DP 201577 Sll'E AREA= 977m2

,-------- ----DAlE DEC 201B

EXISTING SITE/DEMOLITION =1:200 ... ., SIET"°' REV.

233 RC-11

Cl <( 0 0::

en w _J <( ~ en

6J.INE2019 REV RC ISSUE 8ma2018 rev scheme 7 OEC2017 rev 60 CHILD ROU RC ISSUE 5 DEC2017 60 CHILD ROli RC ISSUE

NO DA"!E DESCRIPTION

AACHl"JECTS

ORIGIN ARCHITECTS NZ LTD email: origln.orchltectureOgman.com

PO BOX 56 007, DOIIINION ROAD. AUCKLAND 1446 Telephone. (09) 631 5+43