Long Road March 2007 Film Classification Masterclass
Long RoadMarch 2007
Film Classification Masterclass
2
Today’s Presentation
• Some Facts
• History
• Legislation
• Accountability
• Education
• Questions/Discussion
3
Some Facts
• In 2006, the BBFCBBFC classified:– 555 films
• 198 of these were passed 15
– 15122 Videos & DVDs• 7110 of these were passed U or PG
– 298 Video Games• 186 of these were passed 15 or 18
• In 2006, the BBFC rejected ONE work
4
History
• Established 1912• Independent, non-governmental body funded
through charged fees• Classifies Films on behalf of Local Authorities –
the Cinemas Act, 1985• Classifies Videos, DVDs and some Digital Games
under the Video Recordings Act, 1984
5
History
1. Indecorous, ambiguous and irreverent titles and subtitles2. Cruelty to animals 3. The irreverent treatment of sacred subjects 4. Drunken scenes carried to
‘Indecorous dancing’
‘Drunken scenes carried to excess’ ‘Unnecessary exhibition of under-clothing’
‘References to controversial politics’
‘The drug habit. e.g. opium, morphia, cocaine, etc’
1916T.P. O’Connor’s ‘Forty-Three Grounds for Deletion’
‘'First Night' scenes’ ‘Men and women in bed together’
‘Scenes laid in disorderly houses’
‘Materialization of the conventional figure of Christ’
‘Scenes tending to disparage public characters and institutions’
6
Legislation
The Licensing Act, 2003:
• Cinemas require a licence
• the BBFC classifies on behalf of Local Authorities but they can:– ignore BBFC certificates– grant their own certificates– effectively ‘ban’ Films
7
The Video Recordings Act, 1984
• ‘Video Nasties’
• Criminal Justice & Public Order Act, 1994
• the ‘Harm’ test
• Video Games
8
Other Legislation…
• The Obscene Publications Act, 1959 & 1964• Cinematograph Films (Animals Act), 1937• Protection of Children Act, 1978• Race Relations Act, 1976• Human Rights Act, 1998• Blasphemous Libel
9
Accountability
• Guidelines: February 2005
• Public Consultation– Citizens Juries– Research– Questionnaires
• Research Projects
10
Education
www.cbbfc.co.uk
www.sbbfc.co.uk
Launched June 2003
Launched May 2005
11
sbbfc: the Student Guide
• History, Legislation, Classification
• ResourcesTimelinesCase StudiesNSFW filesResearchArticlesDownloadsNewsReading ListWeb Links
12
sbbfc: for Teachers• Seminars• External Presentations• Downloads• BBFC posters• Feedback
13
The Examiners
• 31 Full-Time/Part-Time Examiners• 8 Specialist Video Games Examiners• Cantonese/South Asian Language Examiners• 4 Senior Examiners• Various Backgrounds• Four Teams
THE
CLASSIFICAT
ION
PROCESS
14
Examining
Examiner Duties
• Viewing
• Examiners’ Meeting
• Team Projects
• Networking
• Correspondence
15
The Examining Process
• Viewing solo (with exceptions)• Over 5.5 Hours per day• Random• Examiner’s Log• Post viewing discussion linked to:
– Guidelines– Policy– Legal Restrictions
• Decision Agreed upon…• Reports Filed• Reports Checked
16
Examining: Issues
• Violence• Language• Sex• Sexual References• Sexual Violence• Drugs• Criminal Activity• Weapons• Imitable Techniques• Horror• Theme• Legal Issues
17
Other Considerations
• the work – its story, style, treatment• the audience – address and appeal• the moral framework• artistic or educational merit• precedent• possible harm• potential level of offensiveness• context
18
Other Outcomes
• Split Decision
• Confirmatory Viewing• Cuts
- legal reasons- policy- ‘category cuts’
• Rejection
19
Cuts: Examples
• Imitable Techniques: violent, criminal, harmful
• Glamorisation of Offensive Weapons
• Sexual Violence: eroticised rape or sexual assault
• Illegal Material• Instruction in Drug Use
20
Questions
21
Thank You…
www.sbbfc.co.uk