Bayesian spatial modelling of disease vector data on Danish farmland Carsten Kirkeby Gerard Heuvelink Anders Stockmarr René Bødker
Mar 28, 2015
Bayesian spatial modelling of disease vector data on Danish farmland
Carsten KirkebyGerard HeuvelinkAnders StockmarrRené Bødker
Biting midges
• Culicoides obsoletus group
• Bloodsucking females
• 1400 species ~ 40 in Denmark
• 1-2mm
• Parasites: protozoans, nematodes
• Virus: African Horse Sickness,
Akabane Virus etc.
Institute of Animal Health UK
Bluetongue virus
• Midge-borne
• Infects ruminants
• Northern Europe: 2006-2010
• Symptoms: Fever, diarrhoea, reduced milk production
Institute of Animal Health UK
Schmallenberg virus
• Midge-borne
• Infects ruminants
• Northern Europe: 2011 - ?
• Symptoms: Fever, stillbirths, malformations, reduced milk production
Institute of Animal Health UK
Aim
How are vectors distributed in farmland?
• Host animals• Tree cover• Temporal covariates
• High/low risk areas• Optimization of vector surveillance• Input for simulation models
Field study
x
Field study
823000 824000 825000
61
38
50
06
13
90
00
61
39
50
06
14
00
00
61
40
50
0
ny.x
ny.
y x
x
x
x
xx
x
x
xx
x
x
x
x x
x
x
x
xx
x
x
x
x
x
x
823000 824000 825000
61
38
50
06
13
90
00
61
39
50
06
14
00
00
61
40
50
0
ny.x
ny.
y 2
0
12
241
100
198
0
610
1
1
162
0 0
14
0
68
240247
26
0
0
45
0
0
Field study
Data
Analysis
Count data
Analysis
Spatial component
“Your neighbours influence you, but you also influence your neighbours.”
Charles Manski
Analysis
Temporal component
t
t-1
Analysis
R: geoRglm package – GLGM krigingpois.krige.bayes()
Bayesian kriging for the poisson spatial model
Y ~ β + S(ρ) + ε
β = + + + + dayeffect + lag1
Analysis
Spatial correlation: Matérn covariance function
Φ
Analysis - separate
Analysis - simultaneous
Distance to cattle farm
Den
sity
-1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Distance to pig farm
Den
sity
-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Distance to angus farm
Den
sity
-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Distance to forest
Den
sity
-0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004
010
020
030
040
0
Analysis - simultaneous
Distance to cattle farm
Den
sity
-1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
Distance to pig farm
Den
sity
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Distance to angus farm
Den
sity
-1.4 -1.0 -0.6 -0.2 0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Correlation with previous catch
Den
sity
0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035
050
100
150
Analysis - comparison
Distance to cattle farm
Den
sity
-1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
Distance to pig farm
Den
sity
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Distance to angus farm
Den
sity
-1.4 -1.0 -0.6 -0.2 0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Correlation with previous catch
Den
sity
0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035
050
100
150
-0.12 -0.33
0.07 0.008
Non-spatialPoissonregression
Analysis - prediction
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
C
P
A
Predicted average vector density
1 km
Analysis – temporal covariatesDistance to cattle farm
Den
sity
-1.8 -1.4 -1.0 -0.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Distance to pig farm
Den
sity
-1.4 -1.0 -0.6 -0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Distance to angus farm
Den
sity
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2
Distance to forest
Den
sity
-0.003 -0.001 0.001 0.003
0
100
200
300
400
Lag1
Den
sity
0.010 0.020 0.030
0
50
100
150
Temperature (C)
Den
sity
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Humidity
Den
sity
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
0123456
Wind speed (m/s)
Den
sity
-3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0
0.00.20.4
0.60.81.0
Rain (mm)
Den
sity
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
012345
Turbulence
Den
sity
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
0
2
4
6
8
Phi
Den
sity
20 40 60 80 100
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
Findings
• Quantify effects of cattle and pigs
• No effect of forests
• Quantify temporal covariates
• Weak positive correlation with previous catch
• More vectors at the pig farm than the cattle farm
Future
•Jackknife
•Validation on other dataset
Acknowledgements
Thanks:
• Ole Fredslund Christensen
• Astrid Blok van Witteloostuijn
Thank you for your attention
Carsten [email protected]