Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Kanopolis Reservoir, Ellsworth County, Kansas Kansas Biological Survey Applied Science and Technology for Reservoir Assessment (ASTRA) Program Report 2008-09 (April 2009)
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of KanopolisReservoir, Ellsworth County, Kansas
Kansas Biological Survey Applied Science and Technology for
Reservoir Assessment (ASTRA) Program Report 2008-09 (April 2009)
This work was funded by the Kansas Water Office through the State Water Plan Fund in support of the Reservoir Sustainability Initiative.
SUMMARY During October 2007, the Kansas Biological Survey (KBS) performed a bathymetric survey of Kanopolis Reservoir in Ellsworth County, Kansas. The survey was carried out using acoustic echosounding apparatus linked to a global positioning system. The bathymetric survey was georeferenced to both horizontal and vertical reference datums, allowing the 2007 lake depth data to be compared to a 1939 US Army Corps of Engineers pre-impoundment topographic map for an estimate of sediment accumulation. Comparison of the 2007 bathymetric survey data to a 1939 pre-impoundment map suggests that the capacity of the reservoir at the 1063’ elevation pool has been reduced from 57,625 acre-feet to 48,784 acre-feet. Ten sediment cores were extracted from the lake to determine accumulated sediment thickness at locations distributed across the reservoir. Sediment samples were taken from the top six inches of each core and analyzed for particle size distributions. Additional sediment samples were taken in April 2009 and also analyzed for particle size distributions. Summary Data:
Bathymetric Survey:
Dates of survey: October 19, 2007October 20, 2007
Water elevation on dates of survey:
1465.12 ft.1465.05 ft.
Reservoir Statistics: Elevation at conservation pool 1463 ft. Area at conservation pool (acres): 3011 Volume at conservation pool (acre-ft): 48,784 Maximum depth at conservation pool: 30.6 ft. Year constructed: 1940-1948
Sediment Survey: Date of sediment survey: October 29, 2008
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................i
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................ii
LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................iv
LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION .................................................. 1
BATHYMETRIC SURVEYING PROCEDUREPre-survey preparation:..................................................................................... 3 Survey procedures: ........................................................................................... 3 Establishment of lake level on survey date: ...................................................... 4 Post-processing ................................................................................................ 6
BATHYMETRIC SURVEY RESULTSArea-volume-elevation tables............................................................................ 9
PRE-IMPOUNDMENT MAP....................................................................................... 12 Pre-impoundment area-volume-elevation tables............................................. 16 Comparison of pre-impoundment and 2007 area-elevation curves................. 19
SEDIMENT CORING AND SAMPLING..................................................................... 20 Sediment coring and sampling results ............................................................ 21
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Kanopolis Lake . ....................................................................................... 1
Figure 2. Location of Kanopolis Lake in Ellsworth County, Kansas. ........................ 2
Figure 3. Bathymetric survey transects.................................................................... 5
Figure 4. Reservoir depth map ................................................................................ 8
Figure 5. Cumulative area-elevation curve. ........................................................... 11
Figure 6. Cumulative volume-elevation curve. ....................................................... 11
Figure 7. Pre-impoundment contour lines map. . .................................................. 13
Figure 8. Digitized pre-impoundment contour lines map........................................ 14
Figure 9. Pre-impoundment digital elevation model . ............................................. 15
Figure 10. Pre-impoundment cumulative area-elevation curve................................ 17
Figure 11. Pre-impoundment cumulative volume-elevation curve ........................... 17
Figure 12. Changes in lake-bottom elevation, 1939-2007........................................ 18
Figure 13. Comparison of 2007 and pre-impoundment cumulative area-elevation curves...................................................................................... 19
Figure 14. Comparison of 2007 and pre-impoundment cumulative volume-elevation curves...................................................................................... 19
Figure 15. Sediment coring sites.. ........................................................................... 22
Figure 16. Map of sediment thickness in centimeters at coring sites ....................... 23
Figure 17. Sediment particle size analysis............................................................... 25
Figure 18. Particle size distributions at sampling and coring sites. .......................... 26
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments.................... 9
Table 2. Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments ..........10
Table 3. Pre-impoundment cumulative area and volume by one-foot elevation increments ................................................................................................16
Table 4. Kanopolis Reservoir sediment coring/sampling site data..........................24
LAKE HISTORY AND PERTINENT INFORMATION
Kanopolis Lake was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1938. Construction of the project began on 8 June 1940. Diversion of the river through the tunnel was made on 29 July 1946. Storage of water in the lake began on 17 February 1948. Kanopolis Lake is a multi-purpose project with storage allocated for flood control, water supply, water quality and recreation.
Kanopolis Lake was constructed and is operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The reservoir is located on the Smoky Hill River approximately 31 miles southwest of Salina, Kansas in Ellsworth County. It is one of the oldest lakes in Kansas. The Smoky Hill River is the major source of water flowing into Kanopolis Lake. The Smoky Hill river basin runs generally from west to east. Kanopolis Lake has 41 miles of shoreline at the top of multipurpose pool elevation. At flood control pool elevation, the lake has 135 miles of shoreline and extends generally westward.
The main embankment is approximately 15,360 feet long, including a 4,070-foot long left abutment and a 2,550-foot long right abutment dike sections. The maximum height above the streambed is 131 feet. The top of dam is at elevation1537.0, which includes a freeboard allowance of 5.2 feet above the maximum spillway design flood. The rolled fill dam embankment consists of impervious, pervious, random, berm fill and blanket fill zones. The upstream face of the dam is protected by an 18-inch thick layer of riprap overlying a 6-inch layer of spalls overlying a 9-inch layer of sand and gravel. The slope protection materials were placed in 1948. The downstream face of the dam is protected with native grass cover.
(This section summarized from National Dam Inventory data, and Kansas Water Office fact sheet descriptions)
http://www.nwk.usace.army.mil/ka/index.cfmhttp://www.kwo.org/ReservoirInformation/ReservoirFactSheets/Kanopolis_Lake.pdf
Figure 1. Kanopolis Dam under construction, 1940s.
1
Ellsworth
Kanopolis
Wilson
Holyrood
Lorraine
Ellsworth County, Kansas
-0 2 4 6 81
Miles
Figure 2. Location of Kanopolis Reservoir in Ellsworth County, Kansas
2
Reservoir Bathymetric (Depth) Surveying Procedures
KBS operates a Biosonics DT-X acoustic echosounding system (www.biosonicsinc.com) with a 200 kHz split-beam transducer and a 38-kHz single-beam transducer. In addition to providing basic information on reservoir depth profiles, the Biosonics system also permits the assessment of bottom sediment composition. Latitude-longitude information is provided by a JRC global positioning system (GPS) that interfaces with the Biosonics system. ESRI’s ArcGIS is used for on-lake navigation and positioning, with GPS data feeds provided by the Biosonics unit through a serial cable. Power is provided to the echosounding unit, command/navigation computer, and auxiliary monitor by means of a inverter and battery backup device that in turn draw power from the 12-volt boat battery.
Pre-survey preparation: Geospatial reference data: Prior to conducting the survey, geospatial data of the target lake is acquired, including georeferenced National Agricultural Imagery Project (NAIP) photography. The lake boundary is digitized as a polygon shapefile from the FSA NAIP georeferenced aerial photography obtained online from the Data Access and Service Center (DASC) at the Kansas Geological Survey. Prior to the lake survey, a series of transect lines are created as a shapefile in ArcGIS for guiding the boat during the survey. Transect lines are spaced more closely (25-50 meters separation) on smaller state/local lakes, while a spacing of 100-150 meters is used for federal reservoirs.
Survey procedures: Calibration (Temperature and ball check): After boat launch and initialization of the Biosonics system and command computer, system parameters are set in the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software. The temperature of the lake at 1-2 meters is taken with a research-grade metric electronic thermometer. This temperature, in degrees Celsius, is input to the Biosonics Visual Acquisition software to calculate the speed of sound in water at the given temperature at the given depth. Start range, end range, ping duration, and ping interval are also set at this time. A ball check is performed using a tungsten-carbide sphere supplied by Biosonics for this purpose. The ball is lowered to a known distance (1.0 meter) below the transducer faces. The position of the ball in the water column (distance from the transducer face to the ball) is clearly visible on the echogram. The echogram distance is compared to the known distance to assure that parameters are properly set and the system is operating correctly. On-lake survey procedures: Using the GPS Extension of ArcGIS, the GPS data feed from the GPS receiver via the Biosonics echosounder, and the pre-planned transect pattern, the location of the boat on the lake in real-time is shown on the command/navigation computer screen. To assist the boat operator in navigation, an auxiliary LCD monitor is connected to the computer and placed within the easy view of the boat operator. Transducer face depth on all dates is 0.5 meters below the water surface. The transect pattern is maintained except when modified by obstructions in the lake (e.g., partially submerged trees) or shallow water and mudflats. Data are automatically logged in new files every half-hour (approximately 9000-ping files) by the Biosonics system.
3
Establishment Of Lake Level On Survey Dates:
Federal Reservoirs: Lake levels on the survey dates are obtained from the US Army Corps of Engineers web sites for those lakes:
Reservoir Names Corps of EngineersDistrict
Website for Lake Level
Clinton Lake, Hillsdale Lake, Kanopolis Lake, Melvern Lake, Milford Lake, Perry Lake, Pomona Lake, Tuttle Creek Lake, Wilson Lake
Kansas City http://www.nwk.usace.army.mil/WaterManagement/EightDayReservoirReport.cfm
Big Hill Lake, Council Grove Reservoir, El Dorado Lake, Elk City Lake, Fall River Lake, John Redmond Reservoir, Marion Reservoir, Toronto Lake
Tulsa http://www.swt-wc.usace.army.mil/old_resvrept.htm
Kanopolis Reservoir Water Surface Elevations:
Survey Date Elevation (feet) Elevation (meters)
October 19, 2007 1465.12 446.56
October 20, 2007 1465.05 446.54
Aerial Photography date Elevation (feet) Elevation (meters)
April 1, 2002 1465.06 446.53
Reservoir shoreline perimeters were digitized off aerial photography, and the elevation of the reservoir on the date of aerial photography was used as the water surface elevation in all productions of TINs or interpolations from point data to raster data.
4
Date of Survey
10/19/2007
10/20/2007
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 3. Bathymetric survey transects in Kanopolis Reservoir
5
Post-processing (Visual Bottom Typer)
The Biosonics DT-X system produces data files in a proprietary DT4 file format containing acoustic and GPS data. To extract the bottom position from the acoustic data, each DT4 file is processed through the Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer (VBT) software. The processing algorithm is described as follows:
“The BioSonics, Inc. bottom tracker is an “end_up" algorithm, in that it begins searching for the bottom echo portion of a ping from the last sample toward the first sample. The bottom tracker tracks the bottom echo by isolating the region(s) where the data exceeds a peak threshold for N consecutive samples, then drops below a surface threshold for M samples. Once a bottom echo has been identified , a bottom sampling window is used to find the next echo. The bottom echo is first isolated by user_defined threshold values that indicate (1) the lowest energy to include in the bottom echo (bottom detection threshold) and (2) the lowest energy to start looking for a bottom peak (peak threshold). The bottom detection threshold allows the user to filter out noise caused by a low data acquisition threshold. The peak threshold prevents the algorithm from identifying the small energy echoes (due to fish, sediment or plant life) as a bottom echo.” (Biosonics Visual Bottom Typer User’s Manual, Version 1.10, p. 70).
Data is output as a comma-delimited (*.csv) text file. A set number of qualifying pings are averaged to produce a single report (for example, the output for ping 31 {when pings per report is 20} is the average of all values for pings 12-31). Standard analysis procedure for all 2008 and later data is to use the average of 7 pings to produce one output value.
All raw *.csv files are merged into one master *.csv file using the shareware program File Append and Split Tool (FAST) by Boxer Software (Ver. 1.0, 2006).
Post-processing (Excel)
The master *.csv file created by the FAST utility is imported into Microsoft Excel.Excess header lines are deleted (each input CSV file has its own header), and the header file is edited to change the column headers “#Ping” to “Ping” and “E1’ “ to “E11”, characters that are not ingestable by ArcGIS. Entries with depth values of zero (0) are deleted, as are any entries with depth values less than the start range of the data acquisition parameter (typically 0.49 meters or less) (indicating areas where the water was too shallow to record a depth reading).
In Excel, depth adjustments are made. A new field – Adj_Depth – is created. The value for AdjDepth is calculated as AdjDepth = Depth + (Transducer Face Depth), where the Transducer Face Depth represents the depth of the transducer face below water level in meters (Typically, this value is 0.5 meters). Four values are computed in Excel: DepthM, DepthFt, ElevM and ElevFt, where:
6
DepthM = Adj_Depth DepthFt = Adj_Depth * 3.28084
These water depths are RELATIVE water depths that can vary from day-to-day based on the elevation of the water surface. In order to normalize all depth measurements to an absolute reference, water depths must be subtracted from an established value for the elevation of the water surface at the time of the bathymetric survey. Determination of water surface elevation has been described in an earlier section on establishment of lake levels.
To set depths relative to lake elevation, another field is added to the attribute table of the point shapefile, ElevM. The value for this attribute is then computed as Depth_ElevM = (Elevation of the Water Surface in meters above sea level) - Adj_Depth.Elevation of the water surface in feet above sea level is also computed by converting ElevM to elevation in feet (ElevM * 3.28084).
Particularly for multi-day surveys, ADJ_DEPTH, Depth_M, and Depth_Ft should NOTbe used for further analysis or interpolation. If water depth is desired, it should be produced by subtracting Elev_M or Elev_Ft from the reference elevation used for interpolation purposes (for federal reservoirs, the elevation of the water surface on the day that the aerial photography from which the lake perimeter polygon was digitized).
Post-processing (ArcGIS):
Ingest to ArcGIS is accomplished by using the Tools – Add XY Data option. The projection information is specified at this time (WGS84). Point files are displayed as Event files, and are then exported as a shapefile (filename convention:ALLPOINTS_WGS84.shp). The pointfile is then reprojected to the UTM coordinate system of the appropriate zone (14 or 15) (filename convention ALLPOINTS_UTM.shp).
Raster interpolation of the point data is performed using the same input data and the Topo to Raster option within the 3D Extension of ArcGIS. The elevation of the reservoir on the date of aerial photography used to create the perimeter/shoreline shapefile was used as the water surface elevation in all interpolations from point data to raster data.
Contour line files are derived from the raster interpolation files using the ArcGIS command under 3D Analyst – Raster Surface – Contour.
Area-elevation-volume tables are derived using an ArcGIS extension custom written for and available from the ASTRA Program. Summarized, the extension calculates the area and volume of the reservoir at 1/10-foot elevation increments from the raster data for a series of water surfaces beginning at the lowest elevation recorded and progressing upward in 1/10-foot elevation increments to the reference water surface.Cumulative volume is also computed in acre-feet.
7
Figure 4. Water depth based on October 2007 bathymetric survey.Depths are based on a pool elevation of 1465.06 feet.
Depth in Feet
0.00 - 4.00
4.01 - 8.00
8.01 - 12.00
12.01 - 16.00
16.01 - 20.00
20.01 - 24.00
24.01 - 28.00
28.01 - 32.00
32.01 - 36.00
Ü
8
Table 1
Cumulative area in acres by tenth foot elevation increments
Elevation (ft NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1432 0 0 1 3 13 30 48 71 94 119 1433 145 174 202 229 255 283 314 343 368 391 1434 414 434 450 467 481 495 506 515 527 535 1435 543 550 558 565 573 581 589 596 604 611 1436 618 625 632 639 646 652 659 666 673 682 1437 689 695 701 707 712 718 724 729 735 741 1438 746 751 756 760 765 770 774 779 784 791 1439 796 800 805 810 815 820 824 829 836 843 1440 849 854 859 865 870 876 881 886 891 896 1441 901 906 910 915 921 926 932 938 944 950 1442 957 963 969 976 982 989 996 1003 1011 1020 1443 1030 1041 1051 1062 1074 1085 1097 1110 1122 1134 1444 1144 1154 1163 1173 1183 1194 1206 1218 1229 1240 1445 1250 1262 1273 1286 1299 1312 1324 1336 1349 1361 1446 1372 1384 1397 1410 1424 1439 1452 1466 1481 1499 1447 1517 1532 1544 1556 1566 1576 1586 1597 1606 1615 1448 1625 1635 1645 1654 1662 1671 1679 1688 1697 1707 1449 1716 1726 1735 1745 1754 1764 1775 1785 1796 1806 1450 1815 1824 1833 1842 1851 1860 1868 1876 1885 1894 1451 1902 1911 1921 1930 1939 1948 1957 1966 1974 1982 1452 1990 1998 2007 2015 2024 2033 2042 2050 2060 2069 1453 2079 2089 2100 2110 2121 2131 2142 2152 2161 2170 1454 2180 2189 2199 2209 2218 2228 2237 2247 2256 2265 1455 2274 2283 2293 2302 2311 2320 2329 2338 2348 2358 1456 2369 2379 2389 2399 2409 2419 2430 2440 2450 2461 1457 2472 2483 2494 2506 2518 2531 2543 2555 2566 2577 1458 2588 2600 2612 2624 2635 2646 2656 2666 2676 2686 1459 2695 2705 2714 2724 2733 2742 2751 2759 2767 2775 1460 2783 2791 2799 2807 2815 2824 2832 2840 2848 2856 1461 2865 2873 2881 2890 2898 2906 2914 2921 2929 2936 1462 2943 2950 2957 2964 2971 2978 2984 2991 2998 3004 1463 3011 3017 3024 3031 3037 3044 3051 3058 3065 3072 1464 3079 3086 3093 3101 3109 3118 3127 3137 3149 3162 1465 3277
9
Table 2
Cumulative volume in acre-feet by tenth foot elevation increments
Elevation (ft
NGVD) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
1432 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 13 21 31
1433 44 60 79 100 125 151 181 214 250 287
1434 328 370 414 460 507 556 606 657 709 762
1435 816 871 926 982 1039 1097 1155 1214 1274 1335
1436 1396 1459 1522 1585 1649 1714 1779 1845 1912 1980
1437 2049 2118 2188 2258 2329 2401 2473 2545 2619 2692
1438 2766 2841 2916 2992 3068 3145 3222 3299 3378 3456
1439 3536 3615 3696 3776 3857 3939 4021 4104 4187 4271
1440 4356 4440 4526 4612 4699 4786 4874 4962 5051 5140
1441 5230 5321 5411 5503 5594 5686 5779 5873 5967 6062
1442 6158 6254 6350 6448 6545 6644 6743 6843 6944 7046
1443 7148 7252 7357 7462 7569 7677 7786 7896 8008 8121
1444 8235 8350 8466 8583 8701 8820 8940 9061 9184 9307
1445 9431 9557 9684 9812 9941 10072 10203 10337 10471 10606
1446 10743 10881 11021 11161 11303 11446 11590 11736 11884 12033
1447 12184 12337 12491 12645 12802 12959 13117 13276 13437 13598
1448 13760 13923 14087 14252 14417 14584 14752 14920 15089 15259
1449 15431 15603 15776 15950 16126 16302 16479 16657 16836 17017
1450 17198 17380 17563 17747 17932 18118 18304 18491 18679 18868
1451 19058 19249 19441 19633 19827 20021 20217 20413 20610 20808
1452 21007 21206 21407 21608 21810 22013 22217 22422 22627 22834
1453 23042 23250 23460 23670 23882 24094 24308 24523 24739 24956
1454 25173 25392 25611 25832 26053 26276 26499 26724 26949 27175
1455 27402 27630 27859 28089 28320 28552 28784 29017 29252 29488
1456 29724 29962 30200 30439 30680 30922 31164 31408 31652 31898
1457 32145 32393 32641 32892 33143 33396 33649 33904 34161 34418
1458 34677 34936 35197 35459 35722 35986 36252 36518 36785 37053
1459 37322 37592 37863 38135 38409 38683 38958 39234 39510 39787
1460 40065 40345 40624 40905 41186 41468 41751 42035 42320 42606
1461 42892 43179 43467 43756 44046 44337 44628 44920 45213 45507
1462 45801 46096 46392 46689 46985 47283 47582 47882 48182 48483
1463 48784 49086 49389 49692 49996 50301 50606 50912 51219 51527
1464 51835 52144 52453 52764 53075 53387 53700 54014 54329 54646
1465 54965
10
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465
Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve A
rea
(acr
es)
Figure 5. Cumulative area-elevation curve
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve V
olu
me
(acr
e-fe
et)
Figure 6. Cumulative volume-elevation curve
11
PRE-IMPOUNDMENT MAP
A pre-impoundment topographic map dated 1939 with a contour interval of ten feet (10’) was obtained in digital form from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) via the Kansas Water Office (Figure 7). The two map panels were georeferenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection, NAD83, Zone 15, using the ArcGIS Georeferencing Tool. Control points were located on the 1939 Corps maps at section corners and referenced to corresponding locations on a UTM-georeferenced USGS Digital Raster Graphic (DRG) topographic map. A second-order polynomial transformation was computed from the coordinate pairs, and the 1939 maps were resampled to the UTM coordinate system using a nearest-neighbor algorithm.
Contour lines were manually digitized to a polyline shapefile and attributed (Figure 8).All contour intervals at elevations 1520 feet and below were digitized (every ten feet of vertical). Lines representing streams were digitized as a separate polyline shapefile and used as breaklines to “force” valley bottoms to their “true” locations. The ArcGIS TIN tool was then used to generate a Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) for the reservoir. The TIN file was then converted to a raster file to facilitate comparison of elevations to the 2007 bathymetric data (present-day lake bottom elevations) (Figure 9).
The pre-impoundment cumulative area-elevation curve exhibited a “stair-step” effect as a result of the 10-foot contour interval used to create the preimpoundment digitial elevation model (Figure 10, orange line). A cubic spline function was applied to the cumulative area-elevation curve, using the contour line intervals (e.g., 1220, 1230, 1240, 1250) as input and splining to one-foot intervals to eliminate the stair-step effect (Figure 10, blue line). No spline function was applied to the cumulative volume-
elevation curve data (Figure 11). Area-volume-elevation curves for the 2007 data were
also plotted with the preimpoundment area-volume-elevation curves as a graphical representation of changes in area and volume since construction.
Changes in lake bottom elevation between 1939 and 2007 were computed by digitally subtracting the 1939 digital elevation model from the 2007 digital elevation model.Negative numbers on the resulting output indicate 2007 elevation lower than 1939 elevation (loss of material during the 64-year period); positive numbers indicate 2007 lake bottom higher than 1939 (accumulated material, or likely siltation) (Figure 12).
As the contour interval is ten (10) feet, areas of ± 5 feet difference are not shown on the difference map. The difference map suggests that the greatest sedimentation has occurred in the former river channel, as might be expected; furthermore, the majority of the non-river channel silt accumulation has occurred in the upper part of the reservoir (Figure 12; orange and yellow colors).
Caution should be exercised in drawing conclusions based on comparison between two maps of different scales, dates, and production methods.
12
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 7. Scanned preimpoundment contour lines map
Legend
2002 DOQQ Perimeter
Ü
13
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 8. Digitized preimpoundment contour lines map
Legend
2002 DOQQ Perimeter
10-ft Contours
Streams
Ü
14
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 9. Preimpoundment digital elevation model.
Legend
2002 DOQQ Perimeter
Elevation in feet AMSL(NGVD29)
High : 1512.07
Low : 1430
Ü
15
Table 3 Cumulative pre-impoundment area and volume
by one-foot elevation increments
Elevation (ft NGVD29)
Splined pre-impoundment cumulative area (acres)
Volume (acre-feet)
1430.0 386 01431.0 446 4221432.0 484 8871433.0 522 13891434.0 558 19291435.0 594 25051436.0 631 31181437.0 669 37681438.0 708 44571439.0 750 51861440.0 1201 59631441.0 1288 72161442.0 1348 85331443.0 1407 99061444.0 1466 113421445.0 1526 128371446.0 1586 143921447.0 1647 160081448.0 1711 176871449.0 1777 194321450.0 2297 212471451.0 2410 236141452.0 2483 260561453.0 2553 285711454.0 2622 311571455.0 2691 338121456.0 2759 365371457.0 2827 393301458.0 2895 421911459.0 2965 451221460.0 3094 481281461.0 3147 512601462.0 3182 544261463.0 3212 576251464.0 3239 608521465.0 3263 64107
16
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465
Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve A
rea
(acr
es)
Splined data Unsplined Data
Figure 10. Raw and splined pre-impoundment cumulative area-elevation curve
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465
Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve V
olu
me
(acr
e-fe
et)
Figure 11. Pre-impoundment cumulative volume-elevation curve
17
Change in lake-bottomelevation, 1939-2007
(values in feet)
+30.01 - +35.00
+25.01 - +30.00
+20.01 - +25.00
+15.01 - +20.00
+10.01 - +15.00
+5.01 - +10.00
+0.01 - +5.00
-4.99 - 0.00
-9.99 - -5.00
-14.99 - -10.00
-19.99 - -15.00
-24.99 - -20.00
-29.99 - -25.00
-34.99 - -30.00
-47.45 - -35.00
Figure 12. Change in lake-bottom elevation, 1939 (pre-impoundment) to 2007.Negative values indicate 2007 elevation lower than 1939 elevation;Positive values indicate 2007 lake bottom higher than 1939.
18
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465
Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Are
a (
ac
res
)
1939 2007
Figure 13. Comparison of splined pre-impoundment and 2007 survey cumulative area-
elevation curve
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
1430 1435 1440 1445 1450 1455 1460 1465
Elevation (feet)
Cu
mu
lati
ve V
olu
me
(acr
e-fe
et) 1939 2007
Figure 14. Comparison of pre-impoundment and 2008 survey cumulative volume-elevation curve
19
SEDIMENT CORING/SAMPLING PROCEDURES
KBS operates a Specialty Devices Inc. sediment vibracorer mounted on a dedicated 24’ pontoon boat. The vibracorer uses 3” diameter aluminum thinwall pipe in user-specified lengths (KBS has used up to 10’ sections). The vibracorer runs off 24-volt batteries, and uses an electric motor with counter-rotating weights in the vibracorer head unit to create a high-frequency vibration in the pipe, allowing the pipe to penetrate even solidly packed sediments and substrate as it is lowered into the lake using a manually operated winch system. Once the open end of the core pipe has penetrated to the substrate, the unit is turned off and the unit is raised to the surface using the winch. At the surface, the pipe containing the sediment core is disconnected from the vibracore head for further onboard processing. The sediment core can be cut into sections while in the pipe, the pipe bisected longitudinally for taking samples along the length of the core, or it can be extruded from the tube and measured.
At each site, determined using GPS, the core boat is anchored and the vibracore system used to extract a sediment core down to and including the upper several inches of pre-impoundment soil (substrate). The location of each core site is recorded using a GPS linked to a laptop running ArcGIS and the ArcGIS GPS extension. Cores are carefully extruded from the core pipe, and the interface between sediment and substrate identified. Typically, this identification is relatively easy, with the interface being identifiable by changes in material density and color, and the presence of roots or sticks in the substrate. For most analyses, the top six inches of sediment are collected and sealed in a sampling container.
Sediment re-sampling:
Several samples were damaged in shipping for analysis. On April 14, 2009, the sites were re-sampled. A GPS linked to ArcGIS and the map of original coring sites was used to locate the boat within ±5 meters of the original site. Several additional sites in the upper end were taken as well. At each location, a Ponar dredge was used to take a sediment sample from the top 3-5 inches of sediment. The sample was manually mixed to ensure uniformity and a sample amount of 32 volumetric ounces (~940 cubic centimeters) was taken. The samples were then sealed and shipped to MidWest Laboratories for texture analysis.
KBS vibe-core system.
20
Sediment Coring and Sampling Results:
Sampling sites were distributed across the length and breadth of the reservoir (Figure 15). Generally, an effort was made to avoid the original stream channel, which would have likely yielded higher sediment thicknesses not representative of the overall reservoir bottom sediment thickness.
Sediment thickness ranged from a low of 34 centimeters at site K01 (located in the shallow southwestern part of the reservoir)(Figure 16, Table 4) to greater than 250 centimeters at sites K04 and K09. Although high sediment thicknesses were found in the upper end of the reservoir near the inflow (Sites K09 and K10), all three sites nearest the dam had sediment thicknesses exceeding two meters (200 cm) (sites K04, K05, and K06)(Figure 16; Table 4).
Clay dominates the particle size analysis in samples taken from Kanopolis Reservoir (Table 4; Figure 17; Figure 18). Of the thirteen sites sampled, only three samples had less than 50% clay content (sites K01, K02, and K07). Sites K01 and K02 are both located in the western part of the lower end of the reservoir, where the lake bottom topography forms a shallow shelf before descending into the main stem of the reservoir (refer back to Figure 4 for lake bottom topography). These two sites also exhibited higher sand percentages (K01: 33%; K02: 18%) than most of the other sites in the reservoir (Figure 17; Figure 18).
21
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
K13
K12
K11
K08
K10
K09
K07
K06
K05
K04
K03K02
K01
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 15. Sediment coring and sampling sites in Kanopolis Reservoir
Ü
22
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
77
34
145
225
250
230
200
280
119
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 16. Sediment thickness in centimeters at coring sites in Kanopolis Reservoir
Ü
23
Table 4 Kanopolis Reservoir Sediment Coring/Sampling Data
Code UTMX UTMYSediment
Thickness (cm) Sand % Silt % Clay %
K01 587215.4 4274271.9 34 33 50 17
K02 587298.0 4274982.4 Ind. 1 18 56 26
K033 588105.7 4275143.9 119 13 22 65
K043 589215.8 4274822.3 250+ 2 8 19 73
K053 588843.5 4274257.0 200 9 17 74
K063 589218.6 4275380.4 230 0 33 67
K07 587459.1 4276280.1 77 14 50 36
K083 586509.3 4277407.0 145 8 17 75
K09 586115.7 4278618.5 250+ 2 13 27 60
K10 586390.6 4279628.3 225 10 33 57
K113 587831.0 4275760.6 n/m 4 20 27 53
K123 587054.5 4276987.2 n/m 4 16 23 61
K133 586388.2 4279634.1 n/m 4 8 30 62
Notes:1. Ind. = Indeterminate sediment-substrate interface. Unable to estimate sediment thickness. 2. Sediment thickness exceeded the 250 cm (8 feet) length of the core tube. 3. Sediment resampled for texture analysis on 4/14/2009. 4. n/m = Sediment thickness not measured. Sample taken for texture analysis only.
Coordinates are Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83, Zone 14 North
24
Kanopolis Lake
2008 Sediment Particle Size Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
K01 K02 K03 K04 K05 K06 K07 K08 K09 K10 K11 K12 K13
Sample Site
% Clay
% Silt
%Sand
Figure 17. Sediment particle size analysis.
25
K13
K12
K11
K08
K10
K09
K07
K06
K05
K04
K03K02
K01
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Miles
Figure 18. Particle size distributions of samples taken from coring and sampling sitesin Kanopolis Reservoir
Ü
Particle SizeDistributions
Sand
Silt
Clay
26
Related Documents
