Page 1
BARYON FORM FACTORS• TWO GAMMA EXCHANGE RESOLVED THE DISCREPANCY
BETWEEN THE DATA OBTAINED BY ROSENBLUTH SEPARATION AND POLARIZATION TRANSFER FOR GE(p)
• QUALITY DATA ON N(1440), N(1535) and some higher N* TRANSITION FORM FACTORS
• CONSISTENT RESULTS FOR THE STRANGENESS FORM FACTORS OF THE PROTON FROM SAMPLE, HAPPEX, A4 AND G0. CHALLENGE FOR THEORY
• CLEAR INDICATIONS FOR LONG RANGE ”PION CLOUD” IN ALL NUCLEON FORM FACTORS
• PRECISION DATA ON GE(n)
• NEW PRECISION DATA FOR gP (p)
• FORM FACTORS --- DVCS --- PARTON DISTRIBUTIONS
Page 2
NEXT FEW YEARS
• NEW DATA ON THE FORM FACTORS IN THETIME LIKE REGION OF Q2
• GLUON POLARIZATION
• TRANSVERSITY … COMPASS-II, FAIR
Page 3
THEORIST’S FORM FACTORS
• CALCULATE FROM CURRENT MATRIX ELEMENTS
– GE(Q2) = (1+τ)1/2 <1/2, Q/2| I0 | 1/2, -Q/2>– GM(Q2)= (1+1/τ)1/2 <1/2, Q/2 | Ix | 1/2, -Q/2>– τ = Q2/4 M2)
• ELECTRIC FORM FACTORS IN THE BREIT FRAME
– GE(Q2) = ∫ d3R eiQ·R ρ(R),– GM(Q2) =∫ d3R eiQ·R (1/2) <j, j| r × j(R) |j, j>
– in the Breit frame, where Q0 = 0
• GOVERNING SINGULARITIES IN TIME-LIKE REGION
Page 4
EXPERIMENTALISTS FORM FACTORS:SPACE-LIKE Q2
• DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION
• dσ/dΩ = σM{ (GE2+τGM
2) /(1+τ)+2τ GM2 tan2 θ/2}
– One-photon exchange approximation– forward-backward Rosenbluth separation
• SPIN POLARIZATION TRANSFER
• GE/GM = - ( Pt / Pl ) {(E + E’)/2 M} tan θ/2
– no forward-backward separation, but instrumental challenge
Page 5
EXPERIMENTALISTS FORM FACTORS:TIME-LIKE Q2
M. Mirazita et al. 2005
Page 6
AXIAL FORM FACTOR RELATION TO PION
DECAYLO ChPT (PCAC)
B. Juliá-Díaz et al., PRC 70
Page 7
EXOTIC FORM FACTORS
• THE STRANGENESS FORM FACTORSCONTRIBUTION FROM SS- PAIRS
• THE ANAPOLE FORM FACTORAXIAL PART IN ELECTROMAGNETIC CURRENT
J = … (GF/Mp2) FA(Q2)(Q2-Q Q )
arises from PV quark interactions
• TRANSVERSITY<P|q
-(0) q(0)|P> » q[P S –P S]
Page 8
I.A.Qattan et al, PRL 94, 142301 (2005)
GEp/GM
p EXPERIMENT
Page 9
TWO PHOTON EXCHANGE
P. Guichon & M. Vanderhaeghen PRL 91, 142303 (2003)
Need only a 6% correction in the dependent term in the differential cross section from TPE to resolve the discrepancy
= 1/1+2(1+) tan2 (/2)
Page 10
HADRONIC CALCULATIONBlunden et al, PRL 91, 142304 (2003)
nucl/th&0506039
nucl-th/0506039
Page 11
THE (1232) CONTRIBUTIONIS SMALL !
S. Kondratyuk et al, nucl-th/0506026
Page 12
PARTONIC CALCULATIONA.V.Afanasev et al, PRD 72,013008 (2005)
Ratio of e- to e+
scattering decisive!
Exp’t planned atNovosibirsk
Page 13
GE ON THE LATTICE
ISOVECTOR FORM FACTORC. Alexandrou (2005)
PRELIMINARY
Page 14
GM ON THE LATTICE
ISOVECTOR FORM FACTORC. Alexandrou (2005)
PRELIMINARY
Page 16
LONG RANGE STRUCTURE IN THE NUCLEON FORM FACTORS
J. Friedrich & Th. Walcher, EPJA A17, 607 (2003)
Page 17
THE PION CLOUD
THE PION CLOUD
J.Friedrich & Th. Walcher, EPJA A17, 607 (2003)
Page 18
POINCARÉ COVARIANT QUARK MODELS
GENERATORS OF POINCARÉ TRANSFORMATIONS:
H, P, J, K K: boosts
CHOICE OF KINEMATIC SUBGROUP:
INSTANT FORM KINEMATICS: P, J, K{H} O(3)
LIGHT FRONT KINEMATICS: P, K, J{H} O(1,2)
POINT FORM KINEMATICS: J, K, P{H} SO(1,3)
Page 19
SU(6) quark model for instant, point and frontform kinematics: fitted wave functions
B. Julia-Diaz, D.O.R & F. CoesterPRC 69, 035212 (2004)
Page 20
BARYON PHENOMENOLOGY WITH DIFFERENT KINEMATICS
B. Juliá-Díaz, F. Coester & DOR, PRC C69 (2004) 035212
SU(6) spin-isospin wave functions x (1 + P2/4 b2)-a
hyperspherical momentum P = ((4/3)(p12+p2
2+p32))1/2
Page 21
GE(n) & Foldy term
Consistent quark model demands covarianttreatment of the boosts
1-2% mixed symmetry S-stateSufficient to fix the qqq quark model
rn2
exp= -0.1161 ± 0.0022 fm2,rn
2 Foldy= -0.126 fm2
solid: instant, dotted: point dashed: front
S’: 2% instant,point,1% front
Page 22
GROUND STATE WAVE FUNCTION ANDCONFINING POTENTIAL
Page 23
Point form quark model form factorsR.F.Wagenbrunn et al, hep-ph/0509047
Very small matter radius r2 = 0.1 fm2
Page 24
AXIAL & INDUCED PSEUDOSCALAR FORM FACTORS
J = {GA(Q2) 5 – i (Q/2 M) GP (Q2) 5 }a
gP(Q2) = (m/ 2 M) GP(Q2)
MUON CAPTURE : Q2 = - m2
Page 25
PROBLEM & RESOLUTION
• ChPT: gP = 8.3 § 0.2
N. Kaiser, PRC 67, 027002 (2003)
• TRIUMF RMC:gP = 12.2 § 1.1
D. H. Wright, PRC 57, 373 (1998)
• New result on ortho-para transition in μ- molecular H: factor 2.7
gP = 10.6 § 1.1
J.H.D. Clarke et al nucl-ex/0509025(+ Triumf RMC)
- Introduces problems with earlier data …
Page 26
Quark model results for GA and GP
MA=1.077§ 0.039 GeV/c2
A.Liesenfeldet al,
PL B 468, 20 (1999)
Page 27
1232) ! N
qqq quark model underestimates the
transtion form factor by » 30 %
Pion cloud and/or sea-quarks
Page 28
Sato-Uno-Lee PRC 67, 065201 (2003)
– N - COUPLED CHANNEL CALCULATION
Page 29
Coupled channel \pi-N-\Delta model
Page 30
T. Sato and T.-S. H. LeeNucl-th/0404025
HADRONIC COUPLED CHANNELS -N- MODEL
Page 31
I.Aznauryuan,ANL talk 2005
Bates,CLAS,PDG
Page 32
I.Aznauryuan,ANL talk 2005
Page 33
NΔ TRANSITION FORM FACTOR ACCORDING TO QCD LATTICE CALCULATION
C. Alexandrou et al, PRL 94, 020601 (2005)
Page 34
C. Alexandrou et al.,hep-lat/0509140
Page 35
Effective field theory NV. Pascalutsa and M. Vanderhaeghen,
hep-ph/0508060
Page 36
I.Aznauryuan,ANL talk 2005
PRD C71, 015201 (2005)
N(1440) HELICITY AMPLITUDES
Page 37
N(1535) HELICITY AMPLITUDESI.G.Aznauryan (CLAS), PRD C71, 015201 (2005)
Page 38
γ, Z0
STRANGENESS FORM FACTORS
Page 39
E. J. Beise et al, Prog. Part. Phys. 54, 289 (2005)
Page 40
D. Armstrong & K.Carter, CERN Courier 45, 8 (2005)GO: PRL 95, 092001 (2005), A4: Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 55, 320 (2005)
SAMPLE: PLB 583, 79 (2004), HAPPEX: PRC 69, 065501 (2004)
Page 41
BUT μs = GMs(0) SHOULD BE NEGATIVE !
ASYMMETRIC LONG RANGE FLUCTUATION … PSEUDOSCALAR MESON LOOP
P↑
+e
-e/3 (strange quark)
K+
Λ, Σ0
< K+ 0 |T| p> » <| ¢ q| >
POSITIVE MAGNETIC MOMENT CONTRIBUTION ?
NO ... MULTIPLY BY – 3 (< s- |γμ| s>
NEGATIVE GMs !
Page 42
D.Beck andR.D.McKeown,Ann Rev Nucl
Part Sci51, 189 (2001)
Page 44
• K,K* loops in the ”chiral” quark model
μs = - 0.046 nm
L. Hannelius & DOR, PRC 62, 045204 (2000)
• QCD Lattice calculation with chiral extrapolation
μs = - 0.046 ± 0.019 nm
D.B.Leinweber & al, PRL 94, 212001 (2005)
” tremendous challenge for future experiments”
Page 46
SPIN DEPENDENT HYPERFINE INTERACTIONLOWERS ANTISYMMETRIC SPIN STATES
<S=0 | 1¢2 |S=0> = -3
<S=1 | 1¢2 |S=1> =+1
COLOR MAGNETIC HF INTERACTION:
V= (2 / 9 m2) s 1 ¢ 2 (r)
FLAVOR-SPIN INTERACTION ...fits the exp’t spectrum
V = C ij Fi¢F
j i ¢ j , C » 30
NUCLEON: <N| i¢j|N> = -2
<| i¢j i¢ j|N> = +10
Page 48
The is in the S-state, Not KΛ like!
B.S.Zou & DOR, PRL 95, 072001 (2005)
Page 49
GM(p) FOR TIME LIKE Q2Fenice/ADONE
E835/FNAL
M. Mirazita et al, INFN preprint (2005)
Page 50
M. Mirazita et al, INFN preprint (2005)
GM(p) FOR TIME LIKE Q2
Page 51
GM (n) FOR TIME LIKE Q2
M. Mirazita et al, INFN preprint (2005)
Page 52
F. Iachello & Q. Wan, PRC 69, 055204 (2004)
GM(n) Vector meson pole + scalar meson pole
phenomenology
Page 53
SUMMARY
• TWO PHOTON EXCHANGE AFFECTS ROSENBLUTH
SEPARATION OF GE , GM
• ALL FORM FACTORS INDICATE ”PION CLOUD”
STRUCTURE IN BARYONS• QCD LATTICE CALCULATIONS APPROACH
EMPIRICAL NUCLEON FORM FACTORS• REALISTIC ChPT EXTRAPOLATION TO SMALL QUARK
MASS ESSENTIAL• THE COMPONENT IN THE PROTON IS NOT A
KΛ FLUCTUATION