Top Banner
Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University
48
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Barbara A. MarinakMount St. Mary's University

Page 3: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 4: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 5: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention or Instruction?

Page 6: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 7: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

• Origins - President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002) oChildren with LD should first be

considered general education students; oSpecial education should embrace a

model of prevention as opposed to failure.

Background

Page 8: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

126597%40-50%

Page 9: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

IDEIA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act: 2004) mandates the use of early intervening services) to:

Identify children who are members of a disaggregated subgroup with a specific learning disability whereby the discrepancy model could result in over identification.

Page 10: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Provide intervention to all children at risk for school failure.

Page 11: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Response to Intervention- not in the legislation

Early Intervening Services- is legislative language

Page 12: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

“Early intervening services” will likely migrate to regular education legislation (ESEA)Focus on core instructionMore flexible tiersMore regular education funding for systemic RTI

Page 13: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention or Instruction?

Page 14: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention or Instruction?

Page 15: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Redefinition of Instruction

Perception of Teacher Preparation Programs

Value of Collaboration

Page 16: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

While catalyzed by special education legislation, RTI is essentially a model of school reform with widespread implications for how all school personnel are prepared, acculturated to the school environment, and how they implement instruction.

(Richards, Pavri, Golez, & Canges, Murphy, 2007).

Page 17: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Requires:

A shift towards a more "individualized" look at individual learning needs

Utilization of evidence-based methods to address these needs

Expertise in data-based decision making

Page 18: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Where? Core reading Intervention

How? Whole class Small group One-one

Whom? Classroom teacher Interventionists Paraprofessional

“ We need to stop thinking about kids in silos and focus our efforts on effective reading instruction…everywhere. “

Ellen Fogelberg, Literacy Director

Evanston District 65 Evanston, Illinois

Page 19: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention cannot be considered effective unless it provides for greater levels of proficiency in core.

Page 20: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) national survey- An Emerging Picture of the Teacher Preparation Pipeline (2010) queries deans/chairs and public school administrators.

Page 21: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Two of the attributes critical in RTI efforts - engaging families in supporting their children’s education and working with children of varying abilities - revealed disparate views.

Page 22: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Deans/chairs indicated that 9% of their teacher candidates are not well prepared to effectively engage families.

Public school administrators indicated that 31% of their new hires are not well prepared to effectively engage families.

Page 23: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Deans/chairs reported that 2% of their candidates are not well prepared to teach children of varying abilities.

.

Public school administrators reported that 25% of their new teachers are not well prepared to teach children of varying abilities.

Page 24: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 25: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 26: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 27: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.
Page 28: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Linda Dorn A Comprehensive Intervention Model: A Systems Approach to RTI

Scanlon and Anderson Using the Interactive Strategies Approach to Prevent Reading Difficulties in an RTI Context

Page 29: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Define and redefine excellent reading instruction for our current and future candidates in collaboration with our school partners.

Page 30: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

So now what?

Page 31: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Infuse Principles of RTI Into:

KnowledgeSkills Dispositions

Page 32: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Knowledge of Guiding Principles

Knowledge of Effective RTI Models

Knowledge of Evidence-Based Methods

Page 33: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

1. Instruction2. Responsive Teaching

& Differentiation

3. Assessment

4. Collaboration

5. Systemic & Comprehensive

6. Expertise

Guiding Principles

Page 34: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

1. Problem Solving 2. Standard Treatment Protocol

Both approaches utilize universal screening, multiple tiers, early intervening services, validated interventions, and student progress monitoring to inform decision.

Page 35: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Which assessments are valued?

How instructional decisions are made?

Nature of intervention?

Page 36: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Focuses on providing a specific research based intervention for students with similar difficulties in a standardized format to ensure fidelity of implementation.

Page 37: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention

Standard Treatment Protocol

Page 38: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Narrowly focused assessment determines intervention

Students receiving 3-5 intervention programs in a single marking period

Tiers of RTI become gate keepers

3-10 Tier models

Page 39: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Focuses on a team making instructional decisions based on multiple data points and interventions being response to students’ needs.

Page 40: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Intervention/Instruction

Diagnostic

Problem Solving Model

Page 41: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Evidence-Based

High Leverage

Page 42: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Hall, Sabey, and McClellan (2005) and Williams (2005) found that text structure

instruction promotes informational textcomprehension.

• Text structure awareness has also been linked to accurate recall and retelling(Richgels, McGee, Lomax & Sheard,1987).

Page 43: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Students should engage in field experiences where RTI is being implemented.

Field offers experience with critical RTI attributes -- long term goals, outcomes for instruction, assessments, organization and scheduling, methods, materials and tasks, and context.

Page 44: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Numerous studies suggest that teacher beliefs play a critical role in educators’ ability and willingness to differentiate (Darling-Hammond, 2000; Rosenfeld & Rosenfeld, 2008).

Page 45: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Effective teachers act on their belief that all students can learn.

Believe that teachers can intervene and make a difference in the achievement of their students (Darling-Hammond, 2000).

Page 46: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Rosenfeld and Rosenfeld (2008) found an increase in teachers’ ability/willingness to consider individual learning differences after exploring their own beliefs.

Study demonstrates the impact such discussions can have on teacher beliefs and practices thereby underscoring the importance of including such topics in pre-service instruction.

Page 47: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Figure 1 contains the attributes critical for planning and delivering excellent reading instruction.

Each attribute is paired with a series of reflection questions.

Taken together, the attributes and questions can be used by teachers (all) and teams when planning lessons and by administrators and literacy coaches when observing reading instruction.

Page 48: Barbara A. Marinak Mount St. Mary's University. barbara.marinak@gmail.com marinak@msmary.edu.

Good teaching is forever being on the cutting edge of a child’s competence.

Jerome Bruner