Top Banner
Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future Professor Brian Lucey Trinity College Dublin & Ussher Executive Education Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012
21

Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Feb 26, 2016

Download

Documents

Ally

Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future. Professor Brian Lucey Trinity College Dublin & Ussher Executive Education. E mergent duopoly? . Banking landscape transformed : Two Pillar Banks Significant job losses will ensure with branch closures inevitable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Professor Brian Lucey Trinity College Dublin & Ussher Executive Education

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 2: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Emergent duopoly? Banking landscape transformed : Two Pillar

Banks Significant job losses will ensure with branch

closures inevitableCB estimates c €6-7b SME lending, €9b

mortgage needed in 12-14, in face of deleveraging to 125%

Banks still facing into rough waters

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 3: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

A long way to go…

Jan-03

Aug-0

3Mar-

04Oct-

04

May-05

Dec-05

Jul-06

Feb-0

7Se

p-07Ap

r-08Nov

-08Jun

-09Jan

-10Au

g-10Mar-

11Oct-

1185%95%

105%115%125%135%145%155%165%

‘Pure ‘ Loan to Deposit Ratio of Irish Covered Banks

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 4: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Covered banks gaining ground?

Jan-03

Aug-0

3Mar-

04Oct-

04

May-05

Dec-05

Jul-06

Feb-0

7Se

p-07Ap

r-08Nov

-08Jun

-09Jan

-10Au

g-10Mar-

11Oct-

1162%64%66%68%70%72%74%76%78%80%

Covered Share Loans Resident PSCovered Share Deposits Resident PS

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 5: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

2008 : Why did we do it

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 6: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

What about guarantees (ongoing) Guarantee is a subsidy to those that

get it Consequence is that those that don’t are

disadvantagedChoice then is

Exit the marketChase more return (and risk)Accept secular drag

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 7: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Risk Embedding Industrial economics of banking

(Gropp, et al, Haknes) “MSI (market share of insured)

significantly increases banks' risk-taking, and the estimated increase in risk is substantial. In contrast, we find no evidence for higher risk-taking at the protected banks themselves, except for banks with outright public ownership.

…public disinvestment and the discontinuation of explicit guarantees may be insufficient to eliminate the distortionary effect of these guarantees: As long as markets continue to expect banks to be bailed out in case of difficulties, the competitive distortions may persist “

Jan-03

Apr-0

4Jul

-05Oct-

06Jan

-08Ap

r-09Jul

-10Oct-

110.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

Covered ShareCovered Share Domestic

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 8: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Risk Embedding 2Recent research in USA suggests bailed out banks

shift risk within Basle asset classes : “bailed banks approve riskier loans and shift

investment portfolios toward riskier securities. However, this shift in risk occurs mostly within the same asset class and, therefore, has little effect on the closely-monitored capitalization levels. Consequently, bailed banks appear safer according to capitalization ratios, but show a significant increase in measures of volatility and default risk”

 Might be useful to do similar for Irish situation

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 9: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Competition not a bad thing

more competitive banking systems are less prone to experience a systemic crisis and exhibit increased time to crisis. This result holds even when we control for banking system concentration, which is associated with higher probability of a crisis and shorter time to crisis. Our results indicate that competition and concentration capture different characteristics of banking systems, meaning that concentration is an inappropriate proxy for competition. The findings suggest that policies promoting competition among banks, if well executed, have the potential to improve systemic stability (Schaek et al 2009)

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 10: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Banking crises are persistentCredit

Calm Crisis Calm CrisisOutput Calm 87% 4% 2% 7%

Calm 19% 72% 2% 7%Crisis 38% 2% 52% 10%Crisis 7% 27% 14% 51%

Table shows transition probabilities from regime to regime, based on 103 banking crises episodes ; Explained Markov switching model Annual data, 4y window; crisis is where annual average growth rate < mean Implication is that where we are now only a 50% changeSource: Serwa 2012Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 11: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Some SuggestionsFree up entry by banks leading to

Cooperative banksNew private banksForeign owned banksBetter regulated banksSmaller banks (max. 30% Assets/GNP at group level) more focused banks (separate mortgage,

commercial and investment functions) Do we wind down or breakup existing banks in

face of embedded moral hazard?

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 12: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Didn’t competition ruin us?

Not hardly….at least not according to the evidence

More specifically: there is relatively little evidence of significant competitive pressure during the credit boomCaveat: survey data only as good as it is, nobody

wants to be seen following a leader.

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 13: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Competitive Forces?

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 14: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Lead or Follow in Lending?

1

2

3

4

5

Competition : Home Competition; EntCompetition : Consumer

Caused credit conditions to loosen

Caused credit conditions to tighten

Quarterly Survey of Banking Conditions: Central BankCrisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 15: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Sure Co-ops are inefficient?

Conception is that mutual/cooperative banks are inherently inefficient.

Care needed on what efficiency is being measured…Evidence on CU and Cooperative banking is not fully

supportive of this : Cebenoyan et al 1993 USA , Girardone et al 2009 Europe for coop and mutual banks gives reasonable evidence on mutuals efficiency – McKillop significant evidence that Irish CU’s inefficient (but what of banks…)

Roy notes bond rating processes similar for cooperative and commercial banks

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 16: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Arent they too small?

European Association of Co-operative Banks data

Coop banks account for Cooperative and related banks account for

between 2% (UK) and 40% (Netherlands) of SME lending.

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 17: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Whataboutery….Cajas

Spanish savings banks : perhaps as bad as Ireland

Deregulation at end of 80’s allowed Cajas to go outside home area, in effect become commercial bank competitors but much less efficient and fragile (IMF Country Report No. 11/216 )

S&L Debacle Massive failures in the 80’s,

series of mistakes, problems and fraud: Deregulation and poor supervision

in a sleepy industry, allowing brokering of deposits and deposit chasing, onlent into a RE bubble, poor quality management and analytical capacity

Moral Hazard of federal insurance of troubled banks

Lax accounting signoffs Persistent state and Fed delays in

accepting crisis resulting in much worse at end

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 18: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Look to the east?

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 19: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Danish mortgages?

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 20: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

Work in Denmark…Danish system works as they have

Good land registry and speedy resolution systemA very conservative LTV approachStrict rules strictly enforced on LTV and incomeLots of law abiding nordic types….

Danish mortgage market is quite concentrated resulting in a higher H index than ireland … but stable.

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012

Page 21: Banking in Ireland: Back to the Future

References/Reading Gropp, et al Competition, risk-

shifting, and public bail-out policies (2011) Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6), pp. 2084-2120.

Hakenes, et al Banks without parachutes: Competitive effects of government bail-out policies (2010) Journal of Financial Stability, 6 (3), pp. 156-168.

Schaeck, K.a , Cihak, M.b , Wolfe, S.c Are competitive banking systems more stable? (2009) Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41 (4), pp. 711-734

A.S. Cebenoyan, et al The relative efficiency of stock versus mutual S&Ls: A stochastic frontier approach Journal of Financial Services Research, 7 (1993), pp. 151–170

 C. Girardone, J.C. Nankervis, E. Velentza Efficiency, ownership and financial structure in European banking Managerial Finance, 35 (2009), pp. 227–245

McKillop, D. and Wilson, J. O. (2011), Credit Unions: A Theoretical and Empirical Overview. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 20: 79–123. 

Flageole, M.-A. and Roy, J. (2005), Rating Cooperative and Commercial Bank Bonds: a comparative approach. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76: 407–435

Duchin, Ran and Sosyura, Denis, (2012) Safer Ratios, Riskier Portfolios: Banks’ Response to Government Aid. Ross School of Business Paper No. 1165

IMF (2007) IMF Country Report No. 07/123 Denmark: Financial Sector Assessment Program—Technical Note— The Danish Mortgage Market—A Comparative Analysis

Crisis and Recovery Conference January 2012