Top Banner
Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998 Cash 85,632 7,282 AR 878,000 632,160 Inventories 1,716,480 1,287,360 Total CA 2,680,112 1,926,802 Gross FA 1,197,160 1,202,950 Less: Deprec. 380,120 263,160 Net FA 817,040 939,790 Total assets 3,497,152 2,866,592
39
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Balance Sheet: Assets

1999 1998Cash 85,632 7,282AR 878,000 632,160Inventories 1,716,480 1,287,360 Total CA 2,680,112 1,926,802Gross FA 1,197,160 1,202,950Less: Deprec. 380,120 263,160 Net FA 817,040 939,790Total assets 3,497,152 2,866,592

Page 2: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Liabilities and Equity

1999 1998Accounts payable 436,800 524,160Notes payable 600,000 720,000Accruals 408,000 489,600 Total CL 1,444,800 1,733,760Long-term debt 500,000 1,000,000Common stock 1,680,936 460,000Retained earnings (128,584) (327,168) Total equity 1,552,352 132,832Total L & E 3,497,152 2,866,592

Page 3: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Income Statement

1999 1998Sales 7,035,600 5,834,400COGS 5,728,000 5,728,000Other expenses 680,000 680,000Depreciation 116,960 116,960 Tot. op. costs 6,524,960 6,524,960 EBIT 510,640 (690,560)Interest exp. 88,000 176,000 EBT 422,640 (866,560)Taxes (40%) 169,056 (346,624)Net income 253,584 (519,936)

Page 4: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Other Data

1999 1998

Shares out. 250,000 100,000

EPS $1.014 ($5.199)

DPS $0.220 $0.110

Stock price $12.17 $2.25

Lease pmts $40,000 $40,000

Page 5: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

(523,936)

Statement of Cash Flows (1998)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (519,936)Add (Sources of cash): Depreciation 116,960 Increase in A/P 378,560 Increase in accruals 353,600Subtract (Uses of cash): Increase in A/R (280,960) Increase in inventories (572,160)

Net cash provided by ops.

Page 6: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

L-T INVESTING ACTIVITIES Investment in fixed assets (711,950)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES Increase in notes payable 520,000 Increase in long-term debt 676,568 Payment of cash dividends (11,000) Net cash from financing 1,185,568

NET CHANGE IN CASH (50,318)

Plus: Cash at beginning of year 57,600Cash at end of year 7,282

Page 7: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

• Net cash from operations = -$523,936, mainly because of negative NI.

• The firm borrowed $1,185,568 to meet its cash requirements.

• Even after borrowing, the cash account fell by $50,318.

What can you conclude about the company’s financial condition from its

statement of CFs?

Page 8: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Ratio Analysis• Why are financial ratios useful?

– Standardized numbers, facilitate comparisons– Used to highlight strengths and weaknesses

• Benchmarking– Comparing a company’s financial ratios with those

of a set of benchmark companies– Gives a way for the company to assess its

performance

Page 9: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Calculation of Ratios

• The Impact of Leverage– Risk sharing– Higher returns– Affect on ratios?

• Any ratio involving income (profitability ratios) will be impact by a company’s leverage choice

• Makes comparisons difficult• What is the difference between two identical companies that

use different leverage?

Page 10: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

• Liquidity: Can we make required payments as they fall due?

• Asset management: Do we have the right amount of assets for the level of sales?

What are the five major categories of ratios, and what

questions do they answer?

(More…)

Page 11: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

• Debt management: Do we have the right mix of debt and equity?

• Profitability: Do sales prices exceed unit costs, and are sales high enough as reflected in PM, ROE, and ROA?

• Market value: Do investors like what they see as reflected in P/E and M/B ratios?

Page 12: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Calculate the current and quick ratios for 1999.

CR99 = = = 1.85x.

QR99 =

= = 0.67x.

CACL

$2,680$1,445

$2,680 - $1,716$1,445

CA - Inv.CL

Page 13: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Expected to improve but still below the industry average.

Liquidity position is weak.

Comments on CR and QR

1999 1998 1997 Ind.

CR 1.85x 1.1x 2.3x 2.7x

QR 0.67x 0.4x 0.8x 1.0x

Page 14: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

What is the inventory turnover ratio vs. the industry average?

Inv. turnover =

= = 4.10x.

SalesInventories

$7,036$1,716

1999 1998 1997 Ind.

Inv. T. 4.1x 4.5x 4.8x 6.1x

Page 15: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

• Inventory turnover is below industry average.

• Might have old inventory, or its control might be poor.

• No improvement is currently forecasted.

Comments on Inventory Turnover

Page 16: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

ReceivablesAverage sales per day

DSO is the average number of days after making a sale before receiving

cash.

DSO =

= = = 45.5. ReceivablesSales/365

$878$7,036/365

Page 17: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Appraisal of DSO

Collects too slowly, and is getting worse.

Poor credit policy.

1999 1998 1997 Ind.DSO 45.5 39.0 36.8 32.0

Page 18: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

F.A. and T.A. turnover vs. industry average

Fixed assetsturnover

Sales Net fixed assets=

= = 8.61x.$7,036$817

Total assetsturnover

Sales Total assets=

= = 2.01x.$7,036$3,497

Page 19: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

FA turnover projected to exceed industry average. Good.

TA turnover not up to industry average. Caused by excessive current assets (A/R and Inv.)

1999 1998 1997 Ind.FA TO 8.6x 6.2x 10.0x 7.0xTA TO 2.0x 2.0x 2.3x 2.6x

Page 20: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Calculate the debt and TIE ratios.

Total debt Total assetsDebt ratio =

= = 55.6%.$1,445 + $500$3,497

EBIT Int. expense TIE =

= = 5.8x.$510.6$88

Page 21: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Too much debt, but projected to improve.

How do the debt management ratios compare with industry averages?

1999 1998 1997 Ind.D/A 55.6% 95.4% 54.8% 50.0%TIE 5.8x -3.9x 3.3x 6.2x

Page 22: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Very bad in 1998, but projected to exceed industry average in 1999. Looking good.

Profit margin vs. industry average?

1999 1998 1997 Ind.P.M. 3.6% -8.9% 2.6% 3.5%

P.M. = = = 3.6%. NI Sales

$253.6$7,036

Page 23: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

BEP =

= = 14.6%.

BEP vs. Industry Average?

EBIT Total assets

$510.6 $3,497

Page 24: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

• BEP removes effect of taxes and financial leverage. Useful for comparison.

• Projected to be below average.• Room for improvement.

1999 1998 1997 Ind.BEP 14.6% -24.1% 14.2% 19.1%

Page 25: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Return on Assets

ROA =

= = 7.3%.

Net income Total assets

$253.6 $3,497

Page 26: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

ROE =

= = 16.3%.

Net income Common equity

$253.6 $1,552

1999 1998 1997 Ind.ROA 7.3% -18.1% 6.0% 9.1%ROE 16.3% -391.4% 13.3% 18.2%

Both below average but improving.

Page 27: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Calculate and appraise the P/E and M/B ratios.

Price = $12.17.

EPS = = = $1.01.

P/E = = = 12x.

NI Shares out.

$253.6250

Price per shareEPS

$12.17$1.01

Page 28: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Com. equity Shares out.BVPS =

= = $6.21.$1,552250

Mkt. price per share Book value per share

M/B =

= = 1.96x.$12.17$6.21

Page 29: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

P/E: How much investors will pay for $1 of earnings.

M/B: How much paid for $1 of BV.

1999 1998 1997 Ind.P/E 12.0x -0.4x 9.7x 14.2xM/B 1.96x 1.7x 1.3x 2.4x

Page 30: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

The Du Pont system focuses on:

• Expense control (P.M.)• Asset utilization (TATO)• Debt utilization (Eq. Mult.)

It shows how these factors combine to determine the ROE.

Page 31: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

The Du Pont Equations:

• ROA = PM * TATO =– (NI/Sales)*(Sales/TA)

• ROE = ROA * Equity Multiplier =– (NI/TA)*(TA/Common Equity)

• ROE = PM*TATO*EM– ROE = (NI/Sales)*(Sales/TA)*(TA/CE)

Page 32: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

( )( )( ) = ROE

x x = ROE.

Profitmargin

TAturnover

Equitymultiplier

NI Sales

SalesTA

TA CE

1997 2.6% x 2.3 x 2.2 = 13.2%1998 -8.9% x 2.0 x 21.6 = -391.4%1999 3.6% x 2.0 x 2.3 = 16.3%Ind. 3.5% x 2.6 x 2.0 = 18.2%

Page 33: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Simplified Data

A/R 878 Debt 1,945Other CA 1,802 Equity 1,552Net FA 817Total assets $3,497 L&E $3,497

Q. How would reducing DSO to 32 days affect the company?

Sales $7,035,600 day 365

= = $19,276.

Page 34: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Effect of reducing DSO from 45.5 days to 32 days:

Old A/R = 19,276 x 45.5 = 878,000

New A/R = 19,276 x 32.0 = 616,832

Cash freed up: 261,168

Initially shows up as additional cash.

Page 35: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

What could be done with the newcash? Effect on stock price and risk?

New Balance Sheet

Added cash $ 261 Debt $1,945A/R 617 Equity 1,552Other CA 1,802Net FA 817Total assets $3,497 Total L&E $3,497

Page 36: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Examples

• If a firm has a total debt ratio of .5, what is its equity multiplier?

Page 37: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Examples

• Austin Co. has a debt ratio of 0.5, a total assets turnover ratio of .25, and a profit margin of 10%. The Board of Directors is unhappy with the current return on equity, and they think it could be doubled. This could be accomplished by (1) increasing the profit margin to 12%, and (2) increasing debt utilization. Total assets turnover will not change. What new debt ratio, along with the new 12% profit margin, would be required to double the ROE?

Page 38: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Examples

• Cost Cos. net income was $120 and had interest paid of $50. Assuming the corporate tax rate is 40%, what was Cost Cos. times interest earned ratio?

Page 39: Balance Sheet: Assets 1999 1998

Examples

• Kansas Office Supply had $24,000,000 in sales last year. The company's net income was $400,000. Its total asset turnover was 6.0. The company's ROE was 15%. The company is financed entirely with debt and common equity. What is the company's debt ratio?