Top Banner
Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and without Vestibular Dysfunction Lin-Ya Hsu, PT, PhC Advisor: Dr. Washington
15

Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Feb 11, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and without

Vestibular Dysfunction

Lin-Ya Hsu, PT, PhC

Advisor: Dr. Washington

Page 2: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Background- Postural Control

• Postural control

– Control COM over BOS

– Achieved by the interaction of 3 sensory systems:

• Visual system

• Vestibular system (inner ear)

• Somatosensory system

– Important for engagement and learning

Jeka et al., 2006 2

Page 3: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Background- Vestibular Assessments

• Vestibular cues

– Difficult to directly manipulate

– Activated by the effect of gravity and/or change in head speed on the vestibular end organs

• Research

– Activate the vestibular system by moving the standing surface

3

Page 4: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Background- MuMBER • Sensory weighting

• Measurement of sensory weighting

– MuMBER System

• Previous findings: Compared to TD, children with FASD had difficulty weighting the vestibular information during postural control

• need to confirm with children with vestibular problems

Jeka , Oie, & Kimel, 2008; Bair et al., 2008

4

Page 5: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Purpose

• To compare standing balance of children with typical development (TD) to children with vestibular dysfunction (VD) when moving the standing surface

• To compare balance skills of children with TD and children with VD by using clinical assessments

6

Page 6: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Sample

• Sample of convenience

• 6 children (8-18 years)

– 5 children with TD (3 girls, 2 boys)

– 1 child with VD (1 boy)

• Exclusion criteria

– Children with other diagnoses

7

Page 7: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

• Lab assessment

– MuMBER

• Clinical assessments

– Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2) short form

– Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)

– Pediatric-Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction for Balance (P-CTSIB)

Procedure

8

Page 8: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Results- Clinical Assessments

9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

BOT-2 P-CTSIB DGI

TD

VD

Page 9: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Sensory weighting- All three sensory input

10

TD – VD –

Page 10: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Sensory weighting- No touching

11 TD – VD –

Page 11: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Sensory weighting- No touching+ eyes close

12

TD – VD –

Page 12: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Summary

• MuMBER

– 3 sensory systems: TD and VD have similar patterns

– No vision, somatosensory: different

• Clinical assessments

– TD showed better balance skills

13

Page 13: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Clinical Relevance

• Importance of postural control

– Engagement, and Learning

• Sensory integrated balance control

– Assessment

– Intervention

14

Page 14: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

Acknowledgements Walter C. and Anita C. Stolov Research Fund

NIH- NIAAA, R21AA019579

Sally Westcott McCoy, PhD, PT

Tracy Jirikowic, PhD, OTR/L

Deborah Kartin, PhD, PT

Robert Price, MSME

Marcia A. Ciol, PhD

Beth Gendler, MSW

Alyssa Mannikko, BS, and Madisen Clark, BS

15

Page 15: Balance Reactions to Varied Sensory Inputs in Children with and

16