Balance GCDP and GIP for Quality Delivery

Balance high quality delivery

in GCDP and GIP in the summer

1.• Through having the right growth model it is advisable that

NO LC is growing a LOT at the same time in 2 ICX or 2 OGX Programmes because it is challenging to balance resources

• What makes sense is that an LC grows in one ICX Programme and one OGX Programme (Eg: iGIP and oGCDP or iGCDP and oGIP)

• Do this for 2014 LC Goals as much as possible!

Consideration for MC Growth Model/OD Model

However, not every LC might have this kind of goal allocation for the fruit peak!

So what should you do in the fruit peak as LC/MC in these 2 cases

High growth/High

volume in both ICX

High growth/High

volume in both OGX

High growth/High

volume in both ICX

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance ICX Programmes

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance ICX Programmes

1.Common issues

- Accommodation- EP Integration into host entity- Logistics, mainly pick ups

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance ICX Programmes

2. Common solutions

• Effective synergy between delivery members in iGIP and iGCDP team to work on accommodation during or right after the TN is matched

• The same members (members from both iGCDP and iGIP) can work together on logistics and pick up of Eps

• EP Integration (cultural aspect) can be done together

• Outsourcing pick up support in case of very very high number of Re only

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance ICX Programmes

3. MC Support in implementation

• Talent Planning to know how many people are needed for better delivery

• Supporting LCs in capacity creation in the summer for both ICX Programme delivery

• Incentives to LCs to ensure high quality through the process

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance ICX Programmes

3. MC Support in implementation

• Synergy between the MCVP iGCDP and MCVP iGIP with the MCVP TM to make sure JD of delivery members and structures allow them to work together on common elements like accommodation etc

Example – SYNERGY IN MAY

LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th

iGIP Team iGCDP Team

Synergy

MAY• Meet to identify common issues and how to take it

forwards• Start working together on accommodation of EPs –

find accommodation, create contracts, payment conditions etc

Example – SYNERGY IN JUNE

LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th

iGIP Team iGCDP Team

Synergy

JUNE• Continue working on accommodation and other

logistics requirements• Start working on virtual EP Preparation together for

Eps coming from the same country for GIP and GCDP

Example – SYNERGY IN JULY

LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th

iGIP Team iGCDP Team

Synergy

JULY• Involve LC in Trainee Pick ups • Assign trainee buddies – no member has

more than 2 preferably • Work together on EP registration etc

High growth/High

volume in both OGX

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

1.Common issues

- Accommodation- EP Integration into host entity- Logistics- AIESEC Support

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in oGCDP and oGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

2. Common solutions

1. Effective synergy between delivery members in oGIP and oGCDP for EP PREPARATION for

Preparing EPs of GIP and GCDP going to the same country – about the culture, accommodation details, contact details in host entity etc

Giving Eps insurance support

Ensuring Eps communicate with host entity virtually

2. Coordinating and aligning with MC expectation settings with host entity

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in oGCDP and oGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

2. Common solutions

• Marketing teams to be on top of clear product and expectation settings in both OGX Programmes

• Specific members in marketing working for oGCDP and specific members working for oGIP support

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

3. MC Support in implementation

• Talent Planning to know how many people are needed for better delivery in both OGX Programmes and in marketing

• Supporting LCs in capacity creation in the summer for both OGX Programme delivery

• Incentives to LCs to ensure high quality through the process

1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)

2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)

3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives, L&D etc

Balance OGX Programmes

3. MC Support in implementation

• Synergy between the MCVP oGCDP and MCVP oGIP with the MCVP TM to make sure JD of delivery members and structures allow them to work together on common detractor issues etc.